Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 56: e18599, 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1132042

ABSTRACT

The present study investigated the association of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen with itraconazole, fluconazole and amphotericin B against Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was found according to M27-A3 protocol and in vitro interactions were evaluated using checkerboard microdilution method. Synergism was demonstrated between azoles and ibuprofen for most isolates. However, no synergistic effects were seen when amphotericin B was combined with ibuprofen. Therefore, our results suggest that ibuprofen presents clinical potential when combined with azole drugs in the treatment of cryptococcosis.


Subject(s)
Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Ibuprofen/agonists , Itraconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Cryptococcus neoformans/isolation & purification , In Vitro Techniques/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/analysis , Amphotericin B/analogs & derivatives
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(2): 1145-7, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26596946

ABSTRACT

Hospitalized ill patients, at risk for invasive candidiasis, often receive multiple medications, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The antifungal fluconazole perturbs the vacuolar proton ATPase. The PPI omeprazole antagonized Candida albicans growth inhibition by fluconazole. A C. albicans codon-adapted pHluorin, Ca.pHluorin, was generated to measure cytosolic pH. The fungal cytosol was acidified by omeprazole and realkalinized by coexposure to fluconazole. Vacuolar pH was alkalinized by fluconazole. Off-target effects of any medication on fungal pathogens may occur.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Candida albicans/genetics , Cytosol/drug effects , Drug Antagonism , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 20(10): 612-5, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25009090

ABSTRACT

Fluconazole (FLCZ) is a first-line drug for treating Candida albicans infections, but clinical failure due to reduced sensitivity is a growing concern. Our previous study suggested that certain drug combinations pose a particular challenge in potently reducing FLCZ's anti-C. albicans activity, and cyclooxygenase inhibitors formed the major group of these attenuating drugs in combination with FLCZ. In this study, we examined the effects of diclofenac sodium (DFNa) and related compounds in combination with FLCZ against C. albicans, and investigated their possible mechanisms of interaction. DFNa, ibuprofen, and omeprazole elevated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of FLCZ by 8-, 4-, and 4-fold, respectively; however, loxoprofen sodium and celecoxib did not. An analogue of DFNa, 2,6-dichlorodiphenylamine, also elevated the MIC by 4-fold. Gene expression analysis revealed that diclofenac sodium induced CDR1 efflux pump activity, but not CDR2 activity. In addition, an efflux pump CDR1 mutant, which was manipulated to not be induced by DFNa, showed less elevation of MIC compared to that shown by the wild type. Therefore, DFNa and related compounds are potent factors for reducing the sensitivity of C. albicans to FLCZ partly via induction of an efflux pump. Although it is not known whether such antagonism is relevant to the clinical treatment failure observed, further investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the reduction of FLCZ's anti-C. albicans activity is expected to promote safer and more effective use of the drug.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/genetics , Candida albicans/genetics , Celecoxib/pharmacology , Diclofenac/pharmacology , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Gene Expression/drug effects , Ibuprofen/pharmacology , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Phenylpropionates/pharmacology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology
4.
J Med Microbiol ; 61(Pt 12): 1696-1703, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22918865

ABSTRACT

The fungicide fludioxonil is widely used in agriculture. Residua of this fungicide are occasionally detected in fruits and can therefore be ingested by humans. The human fungal pathogen Candida albicans expresses the target of fludioxonil, Nik1p, a type III histidine kinase involved in stress response. Inhibition of yeast and hyphae growth was hardly observable after treatment of C. albicans SC5314 with fludioxonil. As a side effect, however, we observed a concentration-dependent induction of the expression of the genes CDR1 and CDR2, encoding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. This was independent of the presence of the target of fludioxonil as induction was also observed in a Δnik1 deletion mutant. Deletion of the CDR1 gene aggravated the inhibition of germ tube formation by fludioxonil, indicating that, in the wild-type, the fungicide was discharged from the cell by Cdr1p. Cdr1p is also known as a resistance factor of C. albicans against the commonly used antimycotic fluconazole. Thus, the effect of concurrent exposure to fludioxonil and known cargoes of ABC transporters on their extrusion and the growth of C. albicans was examined. Pre-incubation with fludioxonil decreased the export rate of rhodamine 6G. The resistance to fluconazole was increased by fludioxonil, independently of Nik1p. Therefore, exposure of C. albicans to fludioxonil may lead to increased resistance to fluconazole treatment.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Candida albicans/drug effects , Dioxoles/pharmacology , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Pyrroles/pharmacology , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/genetics , Candida albicans/metabolism , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dioxoles/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Fluconazole/metabolism , Fungal Proteins/biosynthesis , Fungicides, Industrial/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal/drug effects , Histidine Kinase , Humans , Membrane Transport Proteins/biosynthesis , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Protein Kinases/drug effects , Pyrroles/metabolism , Rhodamines/metabolism
5.
J Dent Res ; 91(1): 65-70, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21972257

ABSTRACT

Triclosan is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial compound commonly used in oral hygiene products. Investigation of its activity against Candida albicans showed that triclosan was fungicidal at concentrations of 16 mg/L. However, at subinhibitory concentrations (0.5-2 mg/L), triclosan antagonized the activity of fluconazole. Although triclosan induced CDR1 expression in C. albicans, antagonism was still observed in cdr1Δ and cdr2Δ strains. Triclosan did not affect fluconazole uptake or alter total membrane sterol content, but did induce the expression of FAS1 and FAS2, indicating that its mode of action may involve inhibition of fatty acid synthesis, as it does in prokaryotes. However, FAS2 mutants did not exhibit increased susceptibility to triclosan, and overexpression of both FAS1 and FAS2 alleles did not alter triclosan susceptibility. Unexpectedly, the antagonistic effect was specific for C. albicans under hypha-inducing conditions and was absent in the non-filamentous efg1Δ strain. This antagonism may be due to the membranotropic activity of triclosan and the unique composition of hyphal membranes.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Candida albicans/drug effects , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Triclosan/adverse effects , Candida albicans/metabolism , Drug Antagonism , Fatty Acids/biosynthesis , Fungal Proteins/biosynthesis , Hyphae/drug effects , Membrane Transport Proteins/biosynthesis , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Species Specificity
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 49(2): 345-51, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11815578

ABSTRACT

Currently, there is considerable debate regarding the best in vitro method for testing antifungal combinations against Candida spp. In this study, we compared the results obtained by chequerboard dilution, time-kill studies and Etest for several antifungal combinations against Candida spp. Three Candida albicans isolates (fluconazole MICs of 1.0, 32 and >256 mg/L) and three non-albicans Candida isolates (C. glabrata, C. tropicalis and C. krusei) were tested in RPMI 1640 medium. By chequerboard testing, the majority of antifungal combinations were found to be indifferent. Notably, antagonism was identified by time-kill studies and by Etest for combinations of amphotericin B-fluconazole, but it was not detected by the chequerboard method. Pre-exposure of isolates to fluconazole did not affect results of the Etest or chequerboard method, but it did increase the frequency of antagonism noted by time-kill methods. This study indicates that chequerboard dilution testing in RPMI medium may not reliably detect the attenuation of amphotericin B activity. Of the three methods, Etest was the simplest to use and yielded reproducible results for testing antifungal combinations.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Amphotericin B/antagonists & inhibitors , Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Candida/growth & development , Candida/isolation & purification , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/statistics & numerical data
7.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 43(8): 1968-74, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10428921

ABSTRACT

Antifungal azoles (e.g., fluconazole) are widely used for prophylaxis or treatment of Candida albicans infections in immunocompromised individuals, such as those with AIDS. These individuals are frequently treated with a variety of additional antimicrobial agents. Potential interactions between three azoles and 16 unrelated drugs (antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiprotozoal agents) were examined in vitro. Two compounds, tested at concentrations achievable in serum, demonstrated an antagonistic effect on azole activity against C. albicans. At fluconazole concentrations two to four times the 50% inhibitory concentration, C. albicans growth (relative to treatment with fluconazole alone) increased 3- to 18-fold in the presence of albendazole (2 microg/ml) or sulfadiazine (50 microg/ml). Antagonism (3- to 78-fold) of ketoconazole and itraconazole activity by these compounds was also observed. Since azole resistance has been correlated with overexpression of genes encoding efflux proteins, we hypothesized that antagonism results from drug-induced overexpression of these same genes. Indeed, brief incubation of C. albicans with albendazole or sulfadiazine resulted in a 3-to->10-fold increase in RNAs encoding multidrug transporter Cdr1p or Cdr2p. Zidovudine, trimethoprim, and isoniazid, which were not antagonistic with azoles, did not induce these RNAs. Fluphenazine, a known substrate for Cdr1p and Cdr2p, strongly induced their RNAs and, consistent with our hypothesis, strongly antagonized azole activity. Finally, antagonism was shown to require a functional Cdr1p. The possibility that azole activity against C. albicans is antagonized in vivo as well as in vitro in the presence of albendazole and sulfadiazine warrants investigation. Drug-induced overexpression of efflux proteins represents a new and potentially general mechanism for drug antagonism.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Azoles/antagonists & inhibitors , Azoles/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal/drug effects , Genes, MDR/drug effects , Membrane Transport Proteins , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/biosynthesis , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/genetics , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/physiology , Candida albicans/genetics , Candida albicans/metabolism , Culture Media , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Fungal Proteins/biosynthesis , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Fungal Proteins/physiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , RNA, Fungal/analysis , RNA, Fungal/genetics , RNA, Fungal/metabolism , Temperature
8.
Mycoses ; 39(3-4): 111-4, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8767003

ABSTRACT

Antagonism between fluconazole (FCZ) and amphotericin B (AMB) was determined with an agar diffusion technique using series of agar plates containing no or 10 mgl-1 FCZ (comparative diffusion assay). Serial dilutions of AMB produced concentration-dependent inhibition zones that varied between the two agar plate series. This technique served as screening method to determine FCZ-AMB interactions in 18 Candida albicans strains. The critical concentrations of AMB were enhanced 1.33- to 7.0-fold by FCZ. The critical time, T0, was reduced by half by FCZ.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida albicans/drug effects , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Agar , Amphotericin B/antagonists & inhibitors , Antifungal Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Candida albicans/growth & development , Drug Antagonism , Fluconazole/antagonists & inhibitors , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...