Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
J Neuroimmunol ; 360: 577706, 2021 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34507014

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) in India is hindered by limited access to cost effective and sensitive assays for detection of aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) in India. OBJECTIVE: To develop a cost effective, sensitive, cell based assay (CBA) for detection of AQP4-IgG and to evaluate the serological status in patients with NMOSD diagnosed by 2015 diagnostic criteria. METHOD: Stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line expressing aquaporin M23 isomer was established. A fixed CBA was developed and validated in 381 samples including clinically definite NMOSD (n = 87), high risk NMOSD (n = 51), other demyelinating disorders (n = 92), other neurological disorders (n = 51) and healthy volunteers (n = 100). We tested the same samples again using a commercially available CBA and compared the results. All assays were performed by 2 independent investigators blinded to clinical and serological status. RESULTS: Our "in house"(Mangalore) assay showed sensitivity of 81.6% (95% CI 71.86-89.11%) for clinically definite NMOSD and 29.41% (95% CI 17.50-43.8%) for high risk NMOSD. Specificity was 100% for both groups. Both assays showed similar results for 67/ 87 (77.01%) patients with definite NMOSD while 4 samples tested positive by our assay alone (Cohen's kappa coefficient [K] - 0.86). Among the high risk group 14/51 (27.5%) samples showed similar results, one patient additionally was positive by the Mangalore assay (K - 0.95).


Subject(s)
Aquaporin 4/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantigens/immunology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Neuromyelitis Optica/diagnosis , Adult , Animals , CHO Cells , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cricetulus , Demyelinating Diseases/diagnosis , Developing Countries , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Health Resources/economics , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Neuromyelitis Optica/epidemiology , Neuromyelitis Optica/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Young Adult
2.
Front Immunol ; 11: 607541, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33343581

ABSTRACT

Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells as a substrate is the gold standard for detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in patient serum. However, the ANA IFA has labor-intensive nature of the procedure and lacks adequate standardization. To overcome these drawbacks, the automation has been developed and implemented to the clinical laboratory. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the analytical performance of a fully automated Helios ANA IFA analyzer in a real-life laboratory setting, and to compare the time and the cost of ANA IFA testing before and after adopting the Helios system. A total of 3,276 consecutive serum samples were analyzed for ANA using the Helios system from May to August 2019. The positive/negative results, staining patterns, and endpoint titers were compared between Helios and visual readings. Furthermore, the turnaround time and the number of wells used were compared before and after the introduction of Helios system. Of the 3,276 samples tested, 748 were positive and 2,528 were negative based on visual readings. Using visual reading as the reference standard, the overall relative sensitivity, relative specificity, and concordance of Helios reading were 73.3, 99.4, and 93.4% (κ = 0.80), respectively. For pattern recognition, the overall agreement was 70.1% (298/425) for single patterns, and 72.4% (89/123) for mixed patterns. For titration, there was an agreement of 75.9% (211/278) between automated and classical endpoint titers by regarding within ± one titer difference as acceptable. Helios significantly shortened the median turnaround time from 100.6 to 55.7 h (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, routine use of the system reduced the average number of wells used per test from 4 to 1.5. Helios shows good agreement in distinguishing between positive and negative results. However, it still has limitations in positive/negative discrimination, pattern recognition, and endpoint titer prediction, requiring additional validation of results by human observers. Helios provides significant advantages in routine laboratory ANA IFA work in terms of labor, time, and cost savings. We hope that upgrading and developing softwares with more reliable capabilities will allow automated ANA IFA analyzers to be fully integrated into the routine operations of the clinical laboratory.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/blood , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Pattern Recognition, Automated , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Automation, Laboratory , Cell Line , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Pattern Recognition, Automated/economics , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Workflow , Young Adult
3.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 52: e20180272, 2019 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is fatal if not diagnosed and treated. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic-therapeutic alternatives for VL in Brazil. METHODS: A decision model estimated the life expectancy and costs of six diagnostic-therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: IT LEISH + liposomal amphotericin B emerged the best option, presenting lower costs and higher effectiveness. DAT-LPC + liposomal amphotericin B showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 326.31 per life year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the feasibility of incorporating DAT and designating liposomal amphotericin B as the first-line drug for VL in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/economics , Antiprotozoal Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/economics , Meglumine/economics , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antiprotozoal Agents/administration & dosage , Brazil , Coombs Test/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Humans , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Meglumine/administration & dosage , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 52: e20180272, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041550

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is fatal if not diagnosed and treated. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic-therapeutic alternatives for VL in Brazil. METHODS: A decision model estimated the life expectancy and costs of six diagnostic-therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: IT LEISH + liposomal amphotericin B emerged the best option, presenting lower costs and higher effectiveness. DAT-LPC + liposomal amphotericin B showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 326.31 per life year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the feasibility of incorporating DAT and designating liposomal amphotericin B as the first-line drug for VL in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Humans , Amphotericin B/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/economics , Meglumine/economics , Antiprotozoal Agents/economics , Brazil , Coombs Test/economics , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Sensitivity and Specificity , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Meglumine/administration & dosage , Antiprotozoal Agents/administration & dosage
5.
Rev Med Interne ; 38(10): 656-662, 2017 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28690094

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: During year 2013, 5943 tests for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) detection were performed in Bordeaux hospital, France. This seemed disproportionate, with regard to the low prevalence of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). Our purpose was to evaluate the relevance of these requests. METHODS: Requests for detection of ANCA during 2013 were recorded, with their results. A sample of 501 requests was secondarily established. Relevance of requests was assessed independently by two reviewers. During year 2014, we developed strategies of information, in order to reduce the number of requests and increase their relevance. RESULTS: Only 17.8 % of the 5943 requests for detection of ANCA resulted in a positive test using indirect immunofluorescence (including 10.6 % of the requests with titles above 1/50). Using Luminex©, 9.7 % of the test of detection against antimyeloperoxidase or antiproteinase 3 antibodies were positive. Within the sample of 501 patients, only 28.7 % of the requests were relevant. A percentage of 40.2 of them weren't justified by a clinical affection typically associated with AAV. Exactly 15.9 of the requests were performed during systematic autoimmune screening. None of these requests could lead to the diagnosis of AAV. Combination of information procedures and use of a request form enabled a 19 % decrease of the number of requests. The percentage of requests without clinical justification also reduced from 40.2 % to 17.1 %. The reduction of the number of requests led to a 46,865 € saving. CONCLUSION: The majority of the requests for detection of ANCA was not relevant and could not lead to the diagnosis of AAV. Simple solutions enabled a partial but significant improvement of their relevance.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/analysis , Serologic Tests/methods , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/blood , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/diagnosis , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/economics , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/epidemiology , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/blood , Cost-Benefit Analysis , False Positive Reactions , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/statistics & numerical data , France/epidemiology , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/blood , Intestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Intestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Intestinal Diseases/etiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Serologic Tests/economics , Serologic Tests/statistics & numerical data
6.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 21(3): 103-6, 2014 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948206

ABSTRACT

The French Military Blood Institute is responsible for the entire blood supply chain in the French Armed Forces. Considering, the high exposition rate of military to malaria risk, blood donation screening of plasmodium infection must be as efficient as possible. The main aim of our study was to assess our malaria testing strategy based on a single Elisa test compared with a two-step strategy implying immunofluorescence testing as confirmation test. The second goal was to describe characteristic of malaria Elisa positive donors. We conducted a prospective study: every malaria Elisa positive test was implemented by immunofluorescence testing and demographical data were recorded as usual by our medical software. We showed a significant risk of malaria ELISA positive tests among donor born in endemic area and we estimate the number of abusively 3-year rejected donors. However, based on our estimations, the two-step strategy is not relevant since the number of additionally collected blood products will be low.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Blood Banking/methods , Blood Donors , Donor Selection , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Malaria/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Military Medicine , Parasitemia/diagnosis , Academies and Institutes , Blood Banks/economics , Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Blood Safety/economics , Blood Safety/standards , Endemic Diseases , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , France , Humans , Malaria/blood , Malaria/diagnosis , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Risk
7.
Lab Chip ; 14(15): 2642-50, 2014 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24345965

ABSTRACT

We present a platform that combines microarrays and microfluidic techniques to measure four protein biomarkers in 1024 serum samples for a total of 4096 assays per device. Detection is based on a surface fluorescence sandwich immunoassay with a limit of detection of ~1 pM for most of the proteins measured: PSA, TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6. To validate the utility of our platform, we measured these four biomarkers in 20 clinical human serum samples, 10 from prostate cancer patients and 10 female and male controls. We compared the results of our platform to a conventional ELISA and found a good correlation between them. However, compared to a classical ELISA, our device reduces the total cost of reagents by 4 orders of magnitude while increasing throughput by 2 orders of magnitude. Overall, we demonstrate an integrated approach to perform low-cost and rapid quantification of protein biomarkers from over one thousand serum samples. This new high-throughput technology will have a significant impact on disease diagnosis and management.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Interleukin-1beta/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/instrumentation , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood , Automation, Laboratory/economics , Benchmarking , Calibration , Cost Savings , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Humans , Limit of Detection , Male , Materials Testing , Microchemistry/instrumentation , Microfluidic Analytical Techniques/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/economics , Switzerland , Time Factors , United States
8.
Am J Med ; 126(4): 342-8, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23395534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study investigated the clinical utility of a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test performed outside of the rheumatology setting. Prior studies have investigated the frequency of ANA positivity within the general population. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the clinical utility of a positive ANA test result in a real-world setting by reviewing the final diagnoses of patients who were referred to a tertiary rheumatology clinic for evaluation of a positive ANA test result. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients presenting to the authors between July 2007 and July 2009. Patients were included in the evaluation if they were referred for a positive ANA test result. All relevant descriptive and laboratory data were collated, as were the initial reasons for ordering ANA testing and the ultimate diagnoses reached. Positive predictive values for a "positive ANA test result" were calculated for all antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic diseases and for lupus specifically. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were referred for a positive ANA test result. The positive predictive value of a positive ANA test result in this cohort was 2.1% for lupus and 9.1% for any antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease. No antinuclear antibody-associated rheumatic disease was identified in patients with an ANA<1:160. The most common reason for ordering ANA testing was widespread pain (54/232, 23.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, more than 90% of patients who were referred to a tertiary rheumatology clinic for a positive ANA test result had no evidence for an ANA-associated rheumatic disease. The poor predictive value of a positive ANA in this cohort was largely attributable to unnecessary testing in patients with low pretest probabilities for ANA-associated rheumatic disease.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Connective Tissue Diseases/diagnosis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/statistics & numerical data , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
10.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 135(5): 678-84, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21502422

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyze antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing to confirm and characterize the pattern and titer of the antibody. We evaluated 4 ANA ELISAs and 1 HEp-2 IFA substrate in 224 clinically defined serum samples consisting of 30 from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cases, 94 from rheumatoid arthritis cases, and 100 from healthy donors plus 495 serum samples submitted for routine ANA testing and 12 reference serum samples distributed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. IFA tests were read independently by 2 certified medical technologists. ELISA sensitivities ranged from 90% to 97% compared with 80% by IFA in the SLE serum samples. The ELISAs had specificities of 36% to 94%, whereas the IFA had 99% specificity. Overall, ELISAs for ANA assays demonstrated better sensitivity and good specificity, suggesting ELISA is a more cost-effective alternative to IFA testing for initial ANA screening. Samples positive by ANA ELISA should be tested on HEp-2 to determine the titer and pattern.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Antibodies, Antinuclear/immunology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Reference Standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 41(2): 153-9, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19115088

ABSTRACT

An indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and slide enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (SELISA) were standardized for the detection of antibodies specific to Babesia bigemina in experimentally infected bovine calves and subsequently used for the screening of naturally infected bovine and bubaline sera. In experimentally infected calves positive reactivity was detected in sera at the earliest on day 7 by both the tests. Serological studies for detection of B. bigemina specific antibodies in 180 cow and 120 buffalo serum samples procured from endemic zones of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab revealed 56.11% and 23.33% seropositivity, respectively, both by SELISA and IFAT. Variation in the reactivity pattern between these tests was found to be non significant. The sensitivity of SELISA was determined to be 94.85% whereas the specificity was 90.85% in comparison to IFAT. The agreement between the two tests by kappa statistics at 95% confidence interval revealed kappa- value of 0.853 that depicts almost a perfect degree of agreement. The findings employing experimental as well as test sera from cattle and buffalo from some of the tick infested zones of India suggested that SELISA could be a useful tool for seroprevalence studies on babesiosis, as the test is less cost intensive with high levels of sensitivity and specificity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Babesia/immunology , Babesiosis/veterinary , Buffaloes/parasitology , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/veterinary , Animals , Babesiosis/blood , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/parasitology , Buffaloes/blood , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/blood , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/standards , India/epidemiology , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroepidemiologic Studies
12.
Transfus Med ; 18(6): 348-54, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19140817

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate which approach for serological testing of multiparous donors might be feasible and effective to reduce the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). TRALI is a serious adverse event of blood transfusion. Antibodies to granulocytes and human leucocyte antigens (HLAs) are frequently detected in sera of implicated donors. These donors are often multiparous women. A general deferral of female plasma or screening strategies for leucocyte antibodies has been proposed to increase blood safety. A prospective study was initiated in 2003. Until 2006, serum samples from all female donors reporting three or more pregnancies (n = 229) were screened for the presence of antibodies against granulocytes and HLAs by immunofluorescence and agglutination tests as well as by a commercial HLA enzyme immunoassay. In total, 40% of all multiparous women were reactive in one of the assays. Twenty-nine percent of the reactive sera contained antibodies to granulocytes but not to HLAs. During the observation period, three TRALI reactions occurred in our hospital, two of which would have been prevented if the screening program had been extended to all previously pregnant donors. We conclude from these data that, not unexpectedly, the number of previous pregnancies is not a reliable indicator for the likelihood of inducing TRALI. More importantly, screening strategies for antibodies that might induce TRALI should probably not be reduced to HLA antibody screening. This finding awaits further research.


Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury/prevention & control , Blood Donors , Donor Selection/methods , Isoantibodies/blood , Leukocytes/immunology , Parity , Transfusion Reaction , Acute Lung Injury/etiology , Acute Lung Injury/mortality , Adult , Agglutination Tests/economics , Antibody Specificity , Antigens, CD/immunology , Donor Selection/economics , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Granulocytes/immunology , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques/economics , Isoantibodies/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Res Vet Sci ; 83(2): 279-81, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17286996

ABSTRACT

Here we describe the diagnostic utility of the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) during a recent outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) subtype H5N1 virus in southern Thailand and demonstrate the usefulness of the cardiac tissue from infected chickens, quail, and ducks for diagnosis. The most reliable sample for IFA diagnosis of influenza A virus was cardiac tissue (83.0%; 44/53) which when divided by species (chicken, quail and duck cardiac tissues) gave respective positivity rates of 88% (22/25), 88.9% (16/18) and 60.0% (6/10). Cardiac tissue also gave the highest IFA intensity for the three species. We believe that the IFA method has wide applicability in developing countries or remote settings where clinically similar avian diseases with high morbidity and mortality such as Newcastle disease and fowl cholera are common and could be rapidly excluded thereby conserving valuable reference laboratory capacity for true HPAI outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Chickens/virology , Ducks/virology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/diagnosis , Influenza in Birds/virology , Quail/virology , Animals , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Heart/virology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Thailand/epidemiology , Time Factors
14.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 45(5): 629-35, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16368728

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the utility of indirect immunofluorescence for the detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA-IIF) and a fully automated test (ELiA Symphony) that detects antibodies against a mixture of nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens (ENA), to select sera that should be tested for non-antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antinuclear antibodies in a relatively expensive automated line immunoassay (INNO-LIA ANA update, Lineblot). METHODS: All 328 sera sent to the laboratory for ANA or anti-ENA tests, over a 4 month period were evaluated in all three assays. Results were related to signs and symptoms of systemic autoimmune disease (AID) that patients had before or at the time of blood sampling. RESULTS: Overall, 72 (22%) sera were Lineblot positive. Of 198 patients without clinical manifestations of AID, 7% were Lineblot positive. Limiting Lineblot to sera positive in either ANA-IIF or Symphony tests failed to detect 26 (ANA-IIF) and 22 (Symphony) Lineblot-reactive sera, with 15 sera being negative in both assays. From a clinical point of view, failure to detect these reactivities was not important in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Restriction of performance of Lineblot to patients with at least one criterion for AID is an ideal and cost-effective strategy. In ignorance of clinical signs and symptoms, screening of sera by ANA-IIF or Symphony strongly reduces the costs of anti-ENA detection, with minimal loss in diagnostic capacity. Based on small differences, including the fact that anti-dsDNA antibodies give a positive ANA-IIF, we prefer screening with ANA-IIF over Symphony.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , DNA/immunology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunoassay/economics , Immunoassay/methods , Infant , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
J Clin Virol ; 25(2): 121-34, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12367646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immunofluorescence (IF) has been used in many laboratories for virus diagnosis but has begun to fall inappropriately out of favour as a diagnostic method as pressure on budgets and for objective quality control increases. OBJECTIVES: To review the status, value and benefits of IF. CONCLUSIONS: IF has, we believe, still a valuable role to play in routine virus diagnosis because it is rapid, accurate (with properly validated reagents), flexible and, by giving feedback on the quality of the specimens collected, promotes dialogue with the customer clinicians to their benefit and to that of the diagnostic laboratory. These benefits are not easily duplicated by other methods or techniques. While such rapid diagnosis primarily benefits the individual patient, providing results within a clinically relevant time has a secondary effect of increasing use of the service. It is our experience that the availability of rapid IF diagnosis (as opposed to culture or serology) for respiratory viral infections leads to a substantial increase in its use, thereby enhancing the amount and breadth of the resultant epidemiological data.


Subject(s)
Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct/instrumentation , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/instrumentation , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...