Esophageal food bolus impaction in pediatric age.

OBJECTIVES: Esophageal food impaction (EFI) is the sudden onset of dysphagia that occurs when a food bolus becomes lodged in the esophagus, requiring endoscopic removal. Scientific data on the prevalence and causes of EFI in children is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide further insights into EFI episodes in children. METHODS: We have prospectively enrolled all children admitted for a first episode of EFI between March 2018 and March 2023. A fluoroscopic contrast study was performed in all patients to confirm the boluses and assess their position. Boluses were extracted by esophagogastroduodenoscopies, and esophageal biopsies were routinely obtained for histologic evaluation. RESULTS: Over the study period, 41 children were admitted for a first episode of food impaction. Drooling was the most commonly reported symptom. Half children experiencing a first episode of food bolus were diagnosed with EoE (20/41, 48.8%). Almost a fourth of the episodes subtended a different condition, such as esophageal anastomotic, peptic or congenital strictures, stricturing caustic esophagitis, esophageal duplication, and achalasia. In the last fourth of patients the cause of EFI was not identified and thus probably related to quick eating and inadequate chewing of food. DISCUSSION: Our study represents the largest known series of pediatric patients evaluated for food bolus impaction. Our main finding is the high frequency of EoE, which accounts for a half of EFI episodes in pediatric age, especially in older children. This finding highlights the importance of obtaining esophageal biopsies after the endoscopic bolus removal in children with EFI to provide a complete diagnostic evaluation.

Do Foods Cause Rhinitis?

Rhinitis is a frequent inflammatory disease, that implies various etiopathogenetic mechanisms. The most relevant are IgE- and non-IgE-mediated cellular infiltration, and different causal substances. Foods may cause of rhinitis in some patients. Rhinitis by foods, or food rhinitis (FR) as a isolate condition, is infrequent and usually associated with other allergic or nonallergic disorders. Food Rhinitis may depend on different pathogenetic mechanisms, including IgE-mediated, type 2 non-allergic inflammation, and hyperreactivity reactions. FR also may dependent on professional exposure, which is a type of occupational rhinitis (OR).

Management of food allergy based on oral food challenge.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food allergy is a growing health problem that affects both patients and society in multiple ways. Despite the emergence of novel diagnostic tools, such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) and basophil activation tests (BAT), oral food challenge (OFC) still plays an indispensable role in the management of food allergies. This review aimed to highlight the indications and safety concerns of conducting an OFC and to provide insights into post-OFC management based on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Standardized OFC protocols have regional diversification, especially in Japan and Western countries. Recent studies suggested that the interval between doses should be at least more than an hour. Furthermore, applying a stepwise method tailored to the patient's specific immunoglobulin E level and history of anaphylaxis seems to mitigate these risks. Recent surveys have shown that, following a positive OFC, options other than strict avoidance are also selected. SUMMARY: OFC serves diverse purposes, yet the risks it carries warrant caution. The stepwise protocol appears promising for its safety. Subthreshold consumption following OFC shows potential; however, further research on its efficacy and safety is required. Management following OFC should be tailored and well discussed between clinicians and patients.

Bone broth ingestion and acute kidney injury following kidney transplant: a role for cystatin C.

Measurement of graft dysfunction following kidney transplant through creatinine is well known to be impacted by many different factors. We report here a clinical scenario demonstrating the importance of dual measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on creatinine and cystatin C while also examining within-subject variability of both tests.

Utility of food allergy thresholds.

Food allergy is a prevalent disease worldwide that is a significant quality-of-life burden, and accidental exposures to food allergens may elicit severe, life-threatening reactions such as anaphylaxis. The threshold level, or the dose that triggers an allergic reaction determined by oral food challenges, varies considerably among individuals suffering from food allergies. Moreover, IgE concentration, diversity, or function can only partially explain this variation in threshold; pathogenic effector TH2 cells have also been found to contribute to the eliciting dose. Though very sensitive to cofactors such as physical activity/stress, the threshold is a stable and reproducible feature of an individual's allergy over periods of many months, made clear in the past several years from treatment studies in which repeated threshold determination has been used as a treatment outcome; however, there also seem to be age-related changes at a population level. More routine determination of food allergy thresholds may help patients stratify risk to improve the management of their food allergy. Precautionary allergen labeling, such as "may contain" labels, often causes confusion since they are inconsistent and regularly contain little to trace allergen residues; thus, food products with such labeling may be unnecessarily avoided. Population-based eliciting dose levels have been determined in the literature; patients at lower risk with higher thresholds may be more confident with introducing foods with precautionary allergen labels. Understanding a patient's threshold level could aid in shared decision-making to determine the most suitable treatment options for patients, including the starting dose for oral immunotherapy and/or the use of biologics.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: a common cause of food bolus obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EOE) is a known cause of food bolus obstruction (FBO) with rising incidence and prevalence. AIMS: To assess the rates of EOE in adult cases presenting with an FBO via prospective biopsy collection during index endoscopy. METHODS: Oesophageal FBO cases requiring gastroscopy between February 2014 and January 2021 at a single institution with a unified policy to perform biopsies on FBO cases were analysed using medical records, endoscopy and histology. Statistical analysis was undertaken to compare those with and without EOE as their final diagnosis, including the timing of oesophageal biopsy and the season that cases presented. RESULTS: One hundred ninety FBO presentations were analysed, 15 patients presented twice and one patient presented four times within the 7-year study period. Men represented 72% of cases. A total of 78% of cases had biopsies collected at an index or scheduled follow-up endoscopy. EOE was the cause of the FBO in 28% (53/190) of presentations. FBO secondary to EOE was more likely to occur in the spring and summer months (Australian September to March), with 39% (19 of 49) of cases presenting in spring attributable to EOE. CONCLUSION: EOE affects a significant proportion of patients presenting with FBO (28%); a high biopsy rate of 78% in FBO cases provides an opportunity for prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Design and validity of the spanish version of two questionnaires related to adverse reactions to foodstuffs / Diseño y validación de la versión española de dos cuestionarios relacionados con reacciones adversas a alimentos

Introduction: there is an emerging current necessity of valid questionnaires, encompassing most of food, beverages, diseases, signs and symptoms currently related to the pathogenesis of adverse reactions to foodstuffs (ARFS) in the Spanish population. Objectives: this study aimed to design and validate two questionnaires to assess ARFS in the Spanish population, Food and Beverages Frequency Consumption Questionnaire to Identify Adverse Reactions to Foodstuffs (FBFC-ARFSQ-18); and Pathologies and Symptomatology Questionnaire associated with Adverse Reactions to Foodstuffs (PSIMP-ARFSQ-10). Methods: both questionnaires were designed adapting questionnaires from the literature; and validated, using the expert judgment method, in five phases: questionnaires development, pilot test and reliability, content validity, face validity, and ethical considerations. Questionnaires were developed using the REDCap™ tool hosted at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. A total of 20 Spanish experts evaluated the questionnaires. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were calculated using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY-USA) and Aiken’s V coefficient values were calculated using ICaiken.exe (Visual Basic 6.0, Lima-Perú). Results: a final construct of questions was designed, ensuring no overlap, for FBFC-ARFSQ-18 and PSIMP-ARFSQ-10. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were 0.93 and 0.94; and Aiken’s V coefficient values were 0.90 (0.78-0.96 CI) and 0.93 (0.81-0.98 CI) for FBFC-ARFSQ-18 and PSIMP-ARFSQ-10, respectively. Conclusions: both validated questionnaires could be used to analyze the association between certain food and beverages consumption with ARFS, such as food allergies and food intolerances; also, to investigate the link between some specific diseases, signs and symptoms with ARFS.(AU)

Introducción: actualmente, existe una necesidad emergente de cuestionarios validados que abarquen la mayor parte de los alimentos, bebidas,enfermedades, signos y síntomas relacionados con la patogénesis de las reacciones adversas a los alimentos (RAA).Objetivos: diseñar y validar dos cuestionarios para evaluar las RAA en población española, el Cuestionario de Frecuencia de Consumo de Ali-mentos y Bebidas para Identificar Reacciones Adversas de Origen Alimentario (CFCAB-RAA-18); y el Cuestionario de Patologías y SintomatologíaAsociadas a Reacciones Adversas a Alimentos (PSIMP-RAA-10).Métodos: ambos cuestionarios se diseñaron adaptando cuestionarios de la literatura y se validaron, utilizando el método de juicio de expertos,en cinco fases: desarrollo de cuestionarios, prueba piloto y confiabilidad, validez de contenido, validez aparente y consideraciones éticas. Loscuestionarios se desarrollaron utilizando la herramienta REDCap™. Un total de 20 expertos evaluaron los cuestionarios. Se calcularon coefi-cientes de confiabilidad alfa de Cronbach con SPSS versión 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY-Estados Unidos) y valores del coeficiente V de Aikencon ICaiken.exe (Visual Basic 6.0, Lima-Perú).Resultados: se diseñó una construcción final de preguntas, evitando solapamiento entre ambas herramientas. Los coeficientes de confiabilidadalfa de Cronbach fueron 0,93 y 0,94, y los valores del coeficiente V de Aiken fueron 0,90 (IC: 0,78-0,96) y 0,93 (IC: 0,81-0,98) (CFCAB-RAA-18y PSIMP-RAA-10, respectivamente).Conclusiones: ambos cuestionarios fueron validados y podrían utilizarse para analizar la asociación entre el consumo de determinados alimentosy bebidas con las RAA, como alergias e intolerancias alimentarias, así como para investigar el vínculo entre algunas enfermedades, signos ysíntomas específicos con las RAA.(AU)

Evolution of Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES) Index Trigger Foods and Subsequent Reactions After Initial Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy treated by trigger food avoidance and supportive care. Whether the prevalence of different trigger foods is changing with evolving food introduction patterns is unknown. The rate and nature of subsequent reactions after initial diagnosis have not been fully studied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize how trigger foods have changed over time and investigate the nature of subsequent reactions after initial diagnosis. METHODS: We collected data regarding patients' FPIES reactions from 347 patients seen in the University of Michigan Allergy and Immunology clinic for FPIES from 2010 to 2022. Inclusion criteria consisted of pediatric patients diagnosed with FPIES by an allergist based on international consensus guidelines. RESULTS: Most foods including less commonly cited FPIES triggers increased in frequency over time. The most common index trigger was oat. A total of 32.9% (114 of 347) patients experienced a subsequent reaction after education on trigger avoidance and safe home introduction of new foods, with 34.2% (41 of 120) of subsequent reactions to new triggers at home and 45% (54 of 120) to known triggers at home. Of patients reacting subsequently, 28% (32 of 114) experienced a subsequent reaction necessitating an emergency department visit. The most common new subsequent reaction triggers were egg and potato, whereas peanut most commonly triggered reactions on oral food challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The risk profile of FPIES triggers may be evolving over time, though high-risk FPIES foods remain common. The subsequent reaction rate after counseling indicates that home food introduction poses risk. This study highlights the need for improved safety of new food introduction and/or prediction methods for FPIES to help prevent potentially dangerous home FPIES reactions.

Comparable Efficacy for Push Versus Pull Technique in Esophageal Food Impaction: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal food impaction (EFI) is a common GI emergency. Push and pull methods are used currently for EFI retrieval. We aim to review current available literature to compare success rates and evaluate adverse event rates of the two techniques. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection, KCI-Korean Journal Index, SciELO and Global Index Medicus. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated when comparing the dichotomous variables. We aimed to evaluate technical success and adverse events for EFI comparing push and pull technique on single arm and comparator analysis. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded a total of 126 articles. 18 studies with 3528 participants were included. The technical success rate was 97.5% (CI 96.6-99.2%) in the push and 88.4% (CI 72.8-98.7%) in the pull technique with no statistical difference on comparator analysis. Overall rate of adverse events was 4.03% (CI 0.9-5.0%) in the push technique and 2.22% (CI 0-2.9%) in the pull technique with no statistical difference on comparator analysis (OR 95% CI 0.464-2.782, p = 0.78, I2 = 31.54%). There was no statistical difference between rate of lacerations and perforations either between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Both techniques have acceptable clinical outcomes which appear within standard of care. Operator experience and individual clinical scenarios should guide decision-making regarding technique selection.

Food Immunotherapy: Dissecting Current Guidelines and Navigating the Gray Zone.

Food allergy is a common, chronic disease that is burdensome for patients and families, with multiple dietary and social limitations and a significant psychological impact stemming from the fear of accidental exposures and potentially severe, life-threatening reactions. Until recently, the only management option consisted of strict food avoidance. Food allergen immunotherapy (food AIT) has emerged as an alternative, active intervention to strict food avoidance, with a multitude of research studies supporting its efficacy and good safety profile. Food AIT results in a raise of allergenic threshold, which provides several benefits to food-allergic patients, including protection from accidental exposures, potentially decreased severity of allergic reactions on unintentional exposures, and improvement in quality of life. In the last few years, multiple independent reports have been published proposing strategies to implement food oral immunotherapy in U.S. clinics, although formal guidelines are currently lacking. Because food immunotherapy is gaining traction, popularity, and interest among both patients and health care providers, many physicians look for guidance on how to implement this intervention in their daily practice. In other parts of the world, use of this treatment has prompted the development of various guidelines from allergy societies. This rostrum discusses currently available guidelines on food AIT from different areas of the world, describes and comments on their similarities and differences, and highlights unmet needs in this area of therapy.

Bulk T-cell receptor sequencing confirms clonality in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis and identifies a food-specific repertoire.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) involves a chronic immune-mediated response to dietary antigens. Recent work identifies T-cell clonality in children with EoE, however, it is unknown whether this is true in adults or whether there is a restricted food-specific T-cell repertoire. We sought to confirm T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality in EoE and assess for differences with specific food triggers. METHODS: Bulk TCR sequencing was performed on mRNA isolated from esophageal biopsies obtained from adults and children with EoE (n = 15) who had food triggers confirmed by endoscopic evaluation. Non-EoE adult and pediatric controls (n = 10) were included. Differences in TCR clonality by disease and treatment status were assessed. Shared and similar V-J-CDR3s were assessed based on specific food triggers. RESULTS: Active EoE biopsies from children but not adults displayed decreased unique TCRα/ß clonotypes and increased relative abundance of TCRs comprising >1% of the total compared to non-EoE controls and paired inactive EoE samples. Among patients in which baseline, post diet elimination, and food trigger reintroduction samples (n = 6) were obtained, we observed ~1% of TCRs were shared only between pre-diet elimination and trigger reintroduction. Patients with a shared EoE trigger (milk) had a greater degree of shared and similar TCRs compared to patients with differing triggers (seafood, wheat, egg, soy). CONCLUSION: We confirmed relative clonality in children but not adults with active EoE and identified potential food-specific TCRs, particularly for milk-triggered EoE. Further studies are needed to better identify the broad TCR repertoire relevant to food triggers.

Food-labeling issues for severe food-allergic consumers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food label represent the primary and only source of information before consuming a food product. Deputy government agencies on five continents require allergenic ingredients to be declared when used in prepackaged foods to assist patients in identifying allergenic foods and to help them to choose wisely. Unfortunately, the mandatory allergen list and legislation regarding food labels and reference doses is not uniform and varies by country. This may add difficulties to food-allergic patients, especially those with severe food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: A new definition of food allergy severity (the DEFASE grid, developed by the World Allergy Organization), aims to assist clinicians in the identification of the at-risk patients. The FASTER ACT and Natasha's Laws has made important improvements such as the entry of sesame as a major allergen in the United States, and increased evidence of allergens on the food label within prepackaged for direct sale (PPDS) in the UK. The recent introduction of Vital 3.0 brought important new features such as an updated reference doses for many foods. SUMMARY: Currently, there are still considerable differences regarding food labels in different countries. Growing public and scientific attention to the problem promises to increase the food safety for allergens. Among the next improvements, we expect a reconsideration of the food reference doses, a harmonization of the food oral challenge process, and the promulgation of regulatory rules for the precautionary labeling.

Changes in risk factors for food sensitization in early life: Analysis over a period of 10 years.

Background: Although epidemiological trends of childhood food sensitization (FS) in IgE-mediated food allergy were reported in China, few studies have examined at changes in its risk factors. Objective: To investigate the change in early-life risk factors associated with childhood food sensitization during 2009-2019 in China. Methods: Data from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2009 and 2019 (401 and 513 children, respectively) were analyzed. The results of skin prick tests and information on food sensitization-related risk factors in children were summarized, including family history of atopic disease (FHA), demographic characteristics, method of delivery, feeding patterns, sibship size, pet ownership, and vitamin D supplementation. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio and the regression coefficient ß-value of risk factors in the 2009 and 2019 surveys separately. Then, coefficient ß-value differences between the two surveys were analyzed by the bdiff command in STATA to describe the change in risk factors over 10 years. Results: The 2009 survey revealed that FHA, age, only child, and feeding patterns were associated with food sensitization. The 2019 survey showed that food sensitization was affected by age, sex, and feeding patterns. However, from 2009 to 2019, the probability of food sensitization in the only-child group significantly increased by 226.0% (ß-value difference = 0.81, P = 0.024) and decreased by 65.0% in female children (ß-value difference = -1.06, P = 0.008). The effect of age on food sensitization decreased by 50.0% (ß-value difference = -0.69, P < 0.001) over 10 years. Conclusion: The effect of FHA and common lifestyle factors on food sensitization did not significantly change during 2009-2019. However, the influence of demographic characteristics on food sensitization has changed since 2009; that is, older age, male gender, and only child are more likely to develop food sensitization, which needs to be considered in future epidemiological surveys. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR1900024338.