Volatile scent chemicals in the urine of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes.

The red fox is a highly adaptable mammal that has established itself world-wide in many different environments. Contributing to its success is a social structure based on chemical signalling between individuals. Urine scent marking behaviour has long been known in foxes, but there has not been a recent study of the chemical composition of fox urine. We have used solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to analyze the urinary volatiles in 15 free-ranging wild foxes (2 female) living in farmlands and bush in Victoria, Australia. Foxes here are routinely culled as feral pests, and the urine was collected by bladder puncture soon after death. Compounds were identified from their mass spectra and Kovats retention indices. There were 53 possible endogenous scent compounds, 10 plant-derived compounds and 5 anthropogenic xenobiotics. Among the plant chemicals were several aromatic apocarotenoids previously found in greater abundance in the fox tail gland. They reflect the dietary consumption of carotenoids, essential for optimal health. One third of all the endogenous volatiles were sulfur compounds, a highly odiferous group which included thiols, methylsulfides and polysulfides. Five of the sulfur compounds (3-isopentenyl thiol, 1- and 2-phenylethyl methyl sulfide, octanethiol and benzyl methyl sulfide) have only been found in foxes, and four others (isopentyl methyl sulfide, 3-isopentenyl methyl sulfide, and 1- and 2-phenylethane thiol) only in some canid, mink and skunk species. This indicates that they are not normal mammalian metabolites and have evolved to serve a specific role. This role is for defence in musteloids and most likely for chemical communication in canids. The total production of sulfur compounds varied greatly between foxes (median 1.2, range 0.4-32.3 µg 'acetophenone equivalents'/mg creatinine) as did the relative abundance of different chemical types. The urinary scent chemistry may represent a highly evolved system of semiochemicals for communication between foxes.

Predator odours attract other predators, creating an olfactory web of information.

Many studies have reported the aversive reactions of prey towards a predator's odour signals (e.g. urine marks), a behaviour widely thought to reduce the risk of predation by the predator. However, because odour signals persist in the environment, they are vulnerable to exploitation and eavesdropping by predators, prey and conspecifics. As such, scent patches created by one species might attract other species interested in information about their enemies. We studied this phenomenon by examining red fox investigation of odours from conspecifics and competing species in order to understand what prey are responding to when avoiding the odours of a predator. Surprisingly, foxes showed limited interest in conspecific odours but were highly interested in the odours of their competitors (wild dogs and feral cats), suggesting that odours are likely to play an important role in mediating competitive interactions. Importantly, our results identify that simple, dyadic interpretations of prey responses to a predator odour (i.e. cat odour = risk of cat encounter = fear of cats) can no longer be assumed in ecological or psychology research. Instead, interactions mediated by olfactory cues are more complex than previously thought and are likely to form a complicated olfactory web of interactions.

Fox urine exposure induces avoidance behavior in rats and activates the amygdalar olfactory cortex.

Predator odors represent a group of biologically-relevant chemosignals called kairomones. Kairomones enable prey animals to recognize potential predatory threats in their environment and to initiate appropriate defensive responses. Although the behavioral repertoire of anti-predatory responses (e.g. avoidance, freezing, risk assessment) has been investigated extensively, our knowledge about the neural network mediating these innate fear responses is rather limited. In the present study, the GABAA agonist muscimol was bilaterally injected (2.6 nmol/0.3 µl) into the amygdalar olfactory cortex (AOC), a brain area that receives massive olfactory input from both olfactory systems and is strongly interconnected with the medial hypothalamic defense circuit. Temporary inactivation of the AOC substantially disrupted avoidance behavior of rats to fox urine that is strongly avoided under control conditions (saline injections). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the AOC is critically involved in fox urine-induced fear behavior. This suggests that the AOC is part of a brain fear circuit that mediates innate fear responses toward predatory odors.

Lack of fear response in mice (Mus musculus) exposed to human urine odor.

A goal of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals is to improve animal welfare by minimizing sources of fear, anxiety, and stress. As a result, it includes recommendations on overcrowding, frequency of cage changes, enrichment, and group housing. However, human odorants are a potential but unexplored source of fear, anxiety, and stress. Although mice have been maintained for decades for animal research, whether mice perceive humans as predators is unknown. If so, this would necessitate changes in animal care and use procedures to minimize this source of chronic fear, anxiety, and stress. Odorants from predator urine are well known to elicit strong fear responses in mice, leading to modification of animal behavior and elevated levels of stress. To begin asking whether human odors influence mouse behavior, we tested the effect of human urine odor on fear response in mice. We assessed mouse behavior by using a modified shuttle cage to record various parameters of mouse exposure to odorants. We found that mice displayed fear responses to 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline, a synthetic analog of red fox feces, but no fear response to DMSO, the diluent for 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline. In contrast, mice exposed to human urine samples showed no significant fear response.

IgG4 response to fur animal allergens among fur workers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether IgG(4) antibodies to allergens in urine extracts from fur animals associated with positive prick tests to the same allergens and with the occurrence of respiratory symptoms among fur workers, especially among highly exposed fur farmers. METHODS: Among the fur workers and among their referents, IgG(4) antibodies to mink and silver fox urine were analysed in three groups; all workers with a positive skin prick test to any fur animal allergen (n=50), all workers who had reported shortness of breath or rhinitis or eye symptoms (n=159), and to a random sample of asymptomatic persons (n=178). In the two last groups none of the workers had a positive skin test to any fur animal allergen. RESULTS: The fur farmers had higher level of IgG(4) values than other groups and also had positive IgG(4) antibodies to urine extract more frequently than the other groups. Among the exposed subjects, there was a distinct overlapping of a positive skin prick test to fur urine allergens and positive IgG(4) antibodies to responding allergens. Among the fur farmers the IgG(4) levels were associated with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: IgG(4) antibodies were shown to be a good indicator of exposure. Because of an overlapping of positive skin prick tests and IgG(4) response to the same allergens, and an association between symptoms and IgG(4) response, it is recommended that the potential role of IgG(4) antibodies as an indicator of alternative sensitisation should be further examined in prospective studies.

Pups presence eliminates the stress hyporesponsiveness of early lactating females to a psychological stress representing a threat to the pups.

Blunted neuroendocrine responses to stress are reported in lactating females after exposure to various stressors. However, many of the stimuli used in these studies have little ethological relevance for maternal protection of the litter in a threatening environment. The question that arises is whether the relevance of the stressor to the infant is critical in the 'gating' of the neuroendocrine response. We hypothesized that the presence of pups with their mothers at the time of exposure to an intruder or a predator odour is an effective way to increase the emotional salience of the psychological stressor, thus eliminating the stress hyporesponsiveness in lactating females. We first compared neuroendocrine responses [corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mRNA in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone] between early (EL, PPD3-5), late (LL, PPD 15) lactating and virgin (V) females to a male intruder in the home cage. We next investigated the effect of pups' presence at the time of stressor exposure on the magnitude of the hormonal response to a male intruder in the home cage or to a predator odour (fox urine) in a novel environment. In the male intruder paradigm, levels of CRF mRNA expression in the PVN and CeA were lower in LL compared to EL or V females and plasma ACTH and corticosterone secretion was not as elevated in LL compared to EL females. Aggression towards the intruder was high in EL females in the presence of their pups and a positive correlation was found with the integrated ACTH response. Aggression rapidly declined after pup separation (2.5 h or 48 h) or in LL nursing females. In EL females, the presence of the pups with their mothers (EL + pups) at the time of stress significantly increased plasma ACTH and corticosterone responses to either male intruder or predator odour compared to EL females without their pups for 2.5 h or 48 h (EL - pups). Plasma ACTH response to fox urine in EL + pups females was comparable to that of virgin females, suggesting that increasing the salience of emotionally relevant stimuli by keeping the pups present in the cage could eliminate the hyporesponsiveness detected for EL females without their pups. These studies indicate the critical role of the pups in modulating the maternal response to stressors that represent a threat for the litter. We hypothesize that the amygdala, because of its ability to process olfactory stimuli and stimuli with affective properties, might play an essential role in 'gating' the neuroendocrine response to stress during lactation.