Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.

Valacyclovir or valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: A randomized controlled trial in adult and pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (valG), a cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylactic agent, has dose-limiting side effects. The tolerability and effectiveness of valacyclovir (valA) as CMV prophylaxis is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, single-center trial of valA versus valG for all posttransplant CMV prophylaxis in adult and pediatric kidney recipients. Participants were randomly assigned to receive valA or valG. Primary endpoints were the incidence of CMV viremia and side-effect related drug reduction with secondary assessment of incidence of EBV viremia. RESULTS: Of the 137 sequential kidney transplant recipients enrolled, 26 % were positive and negative for CMV antibody in donor and recipient respectively. The incidence of CMV viremia (4 of 71 [6 %]; 8 of 67 [12 %] P = 0.23), time to viremia (P = 0.16) and area under CMV viral load time curve (P = 0.19) were not significantly different. ValG participants were significantly more likely to require side-effect related dose reduction (15/71 [21 %] versus 1/66 [2 %] P = 0.0003). Leukopenia was the most common reason for valG dose reduction and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was utilized for leukopenia recovery more frequently (25 % in valG vs 5 % in valA: P = 0.0007). Incidence of EBV viremia was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: ValA has significantly less dose-limiting side effects than valG. In our study population, a significant increase in CMV viremia was not observed, in adults and children after kidney transplant, compared to valG. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01329185.

Evaluation of valganciclovir's neutropenia risk in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients utilizing two dosing regimens.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir is approved for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatrics using the Pescovitz algorithm. There are reports of valganciclovir overdoses in children with low body surface area and overestimated creatinine clearance utilizing this algorithm. This study compared the incidence of neutropenia and cytomegalovirus infection between the Pescovitz and weight-based dosing algorithms. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review from January 2010 to September 2018 was performed on pediatric heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients, who received valganciclovir. Data were collected from the initiation of valganciclovir prophylaxis to 30 days after discontinuation. The primary objective was the incidence of neutropenia in patients receiving valganciclovir dosed by the Pescovitz versus weight-based dosing algorithms. RESULTS: This study included 187 pediatric transplant recipients who received valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz (62 recipients) or weight-based dosing algorithms (125 recipients). The incidence of neutropenia was higher in the Pescovitz (69.4%) compared to the weight-based dosing group (53.6%; p = .04) including moderate and severe neutropenia. Cytomegalovirus viremia was not significantly different between the two groups and occurred in 4.8% of the Pescovitz group compared to 2.4% of the weight-based group (p = .4). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of neutropenia was greater in recipients receiving valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz algorithm compared to the weight-based dosing. There were no significant differences in regard to cytomegalovirus viremia or disease between the two groups.

Incidence of valganciclovir-related leukopenia and neutropenia in solid organ transplant recipients at high risk of cytomegalovirus disease.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis is associated with an increased risk of hematologic side effects. We analyzed the impact of VGCV prophylaxis on leukopenia and neutropenia rates and explored risk factors for its occurrence. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients of either CMV-seropositive (CMV D+/R-) or CMV-seronegative (CMV D-/R-) donors between July 2005 and March 2019. CMV D+/R- SOT recipients received 3-12 months of VGCV prophylaxis whereas CMV D-/R- SOT recipients received no VGCV prophylaxis. Competing risk regression was used to calculate risk factors for significant neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1000/µL). RESULTS: A total of 430 CMV-seronegative SOT recipients (median age of 52.1 years, 76.5% males) were included, of which 203 (47.2%) were CMV D+/R- and 227 (52.8%) CMV D-/R-. The unadjusted incidence rate ratio of significant neutropenia attributable to VGCV exposure in the first year post-transplant was 13.50 (95% confidence interval 7.36-27.11). Acute rejection occurred more frequently in neutropenic patients at 32.5% compared to 19.1% in those without neutropenia (p = .033). On multivariate analysis, VGCV prophylaxis for 1-90 days and 91-180 days versus no VGCV were the strongest risk factors for significant neutropenia with a sub-distribution hazard ratio of 39.6 (95% CI, 8.57-182.6) and 13.2 (95% CI, 5.46-32.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VGCV prophylaxis is limited by high rates of neutropenia. Future prospective studies are needed to assess alternative CMV prophylactic strategies in SOT recipients.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Antiviral Agents for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with higher non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). But the preferred drug for preventing cytomegalovirus infection is still controversial. We evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of antiviral agents based on the most recent studies. METHODS: A pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted to obtain direct and indirect evidence of antivirals. The cost of allo-HSCT recipients in a teaching hospital was collected, and a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision tree combined with Markov model was completed from the perspective of allo-HSCT recipients over a lifetime horizon. RESULTS: A total of 19 RCTs involving 3565 patients (8 antivirals) were included. In the network meta-analysis, relative to placebo, letermovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir significantly reduced CMV infection incidence; ganciclovir significantly reduced CMV disease incidence; ganciclovir significantly increased the incidence of serious adverse event; none of antivirals significantly reduced all-cause mortality. Based on meta-analysis and Chinese medical data, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved for maribavir, acyclovir, valacyclovir, ganciclovir, and letermovir relative to placebo corresponded to US$216 635.70, US$11 590.20, US$11 816.40, US$13 049.90, and US$12 189.40, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis showed the most influential parameter was discount rate. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 53.0% probability of letermovir producing an ICER below the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$38 824.23/QALY. The scenario analysis demonstrated prophylaxis with letermovir is considered cost-effective in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, letermovir is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for preventing CMV infection, and it might be a cost-effective choice in allo-HSCT recipients in China.

Safety and efficacy of weight-based ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients.

BACKGROUND: The management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is particularly challenging as both CMV and its usual first-line treatment, ganciclovir, are associated with neutropenia. Ganciclovir dosing is weight-based, most commonly utilizing total body weight (TBW). The subsequent high doses of ganciclovir in overweight/obese patients may increase the risk of toxicity. Utilizing adjusted body weight (AdjBW) dosing may help mitigate this risk. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in toxicity and efficacy between TBW and AdjBW ganciclovir dosing strategies in overweight/obese patients. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted safety and efficacy analyses of ganciclovir courses (≥72 h) used as CMV treatment. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/µL), and the primary efficacy outcome was a 2-log decrease in CMV polymerase chain reaction within 4 weeks following ganciclovir initiation. In both analyses, courses were excluded in which ganciclovir was dosed outside of specified renal dosing parameters for >20% of the course. RESULTS: Among the 253 courses in the safety cohort, there was no difference in the incidence of neutropenia (17.4% vs. 13.5%, p = .50) in AdjBW compared to TBW dosing. In the 62 courses evaluating efficacy, there was no statistical difference between AdjBW and TBW dosing (60.0% vs. 45.2%, p = .28). No subgroups were identified in which AdjBW dosing was advantageous. CONCLUSION: Utilization of AdjBW ganciclovir dosing did not result in decreased neutropenia or treatment efficacy as compared to TBW dosing. Further studies with larger patient populations would be beneficial to confirm these findings.

Trough ganciclovir concentration as predictor of leukopenia in lung transplant recipients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir is the first-line agent for Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after lung transplantation. However, its use is associated with a relatively high risk of hematological toxicity. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between trough ganciclovir concentration and hematologic toxicity in lung transplantation patients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, and identify factors that affect ganciclovir pharmacokinetics in this population. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 24 lung transplant patients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis. The cutoff value of trough ganciclovir concentration was estimated using receiver operating characteristic analysis in leukopenia grade 3 and higher. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling program. RESULTS: The trough ganciclovir concentration was significantly higher in the group with leukopenia grades 3 or higher than in the group with grades less than or equal to 2 (1605.7 ± 860.1 ng/mL [n = 3] vs. 380.5 ± 175.8 ng/mL (n = 21), p < .001). The cutoff value of trough ganciclovir concentration for predicting greater than or equal to grade 3 leukopenia was estimated as 872.0 ng/mL. Creatinine clearance and lung re-transplantation were found to have a significant impact on the total body clearance of valganciclovir. Ganciclovir clearance was decreased in patients with reduced creatine clearance or re-transplantation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that higher ganciclovir trough concentrations are associated with an increased risk of leukopenia grade 3 or higher, and that creatinine clearance and lung re-transplantation affected the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir.

Does therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of trough concentrations suffice for optimizing preemptive therapy with ganciclovir of cytomegalovirus infections in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between ganciclovir exposure and clinical efficacy and/or safety in non-renal solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receiving preemptive therapy with ganciclovir/valganciclovir and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing optimization. METHODS: Non-renal SOT recipients admitted to IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Bologna receiving preemptive therapy with ganciclovir or valganciclovir for active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and who underwent at least one TDM were included. Desired ganciclovir Cmin range was set at 1-3 mg/L, and average ganciclovir trough concentrations (Cmin ) were calculated for each patient. Reduced CMV viral load below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) at 30 days and occurrence of myelotoxicity were selected as the primary outcome. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing patients with average Cmin below or above 1 or 3 mg/L. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the average ganciclovir Cmin cut-off predictive for clinical efficacy or toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-nine out of 89 retrieved patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median (interquartile [IQR]) baseline CMV viral load of 27,163 copies/mL (IQR 13 159.75-151 340.25 copies/mL). Reduced CMV viral load below the LLQ at 30 days was found in 17 patients (58.6%). No difference was found in the primary outcome between patients showing average Cmin below or above 1 mg/L (100.0% vs. 53.8%; p = .25) and/or 3 mg/L (65.2% vs. 33.3%; p = .20). ROC analysis did not allow to identify an average Cmin cut-off predictive of clinical efficacy or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: No clear relationship between ganciclovir Cmin and neither CMV eradication nor safety issues was identified.

Comparison of two different intravitreal treatment regimens combined with systemic antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and injection frequency of intravitreal low-dose vs. intermediate-dose ganciclovir therapy in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients exhibiting cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR). METHODS: A prospective, single-centre, double-blinded, randomized controlled interventional study was conducted. Fifty patients with a total of 67 included eyes were randomly divided into low-dose (0.4 mg ganciclovir per week) and intermediate-dose (1.0 mg ganciclovir per week) groups. The primary clinical outcomes were the changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the end of treatment and the 12-month follow-up visit as well as the number of intravitreal injections. RESULTS: In both groups, the median BCVA, expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), improved significantly from baseline to the end of treatment (both p < 0.001), while vision loss from CMVR continued to occur at the 12-month visit. The mean number of injections was 5.8 in the low-dose group and 5.4 in the intermediate-dose group. No significant differences were detected between the two groups (p > 0.05). Regarding the location of CMVR, we found that Zone I lesions led to a worse visual outcome, more injections and a higher occurrence rate of complications than lesions in other zones (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and frequency of injections to treat CMVR in AIDS patients were not significantly different between low and intermediate doses. Zone I lesions were associated with a worse visual outcome, more injections and a higher occurrence rate of CMVR-related complications than lesions in other zones.

Assessing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects reporting in women exposed to ganciclovir or valganciclovir during pregnancy: a pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide. Reference anti-CMV treatment is valganciclovir/ganciclovir, which is contraindicated in pregnancy given questions about teratogenicity. METHODS: We analysed reports from VigiBase, the world's largest safety database, and performed a disproportionality analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with (val)ganciclovir compared with any other drugs or with (val)aciclovir as comparators. RESULTS: Among 3 104 984 reports related to childbearing-age women or to pregnancy topics, 6186 were exposed to (val)ganciclovir or (val)aciclovir including 251 adverse pregnancy outcomes with (val)ganciclovir (n = 34) or (val)aciclovir (n = 217). We did not evidence any increased reporting of any adverse pregnancy outcome [miscarriage, stillbirth, small weight for gestational age, preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation)] or birth defects with (val)ganciclovir compared with the use of (val)aciclovir during pregnancy. Four cases of oesophageal and anorectal atresia were identified with (val)ganciclovir, which may be related to concomitant drugs/medical conditions and require further analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results require confirmation but suggest the possibility for trial evaluation of val(ganciclovir) in severe maternal or fetal CMV infections.

Detection of drug safety signal of drug-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis in all-aged patients using electronic medical records.

PURPOSE: We explored the adverse drug reaction signals of drug-induced neutropenia (DIN) and drug-induced agranulocytosis (DIA) in hospitalized patients and evaluated the novelty of these correlations. METHOD: A two-step method was established to identify the relationship between drugs and DIN or DIA using 5-year electronic medical records (EMRs) obtained from 242 000 patients at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. First, the drugs suspected to induce DIN or DIA were selected. The associations between suspected drugs and DIN or DIA were evaluated by a retrospective cohort study using unconditional logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: Twelve suspected drugs (vancomycin, meropenem, voriconazole, acyclovir, ganciclovir, fluconazole, oseltamivir, linezolid, compound borax solution, palonosetron, polyene phosphatidylcholine, and sulfamethoxazole) were associated with DIN, and six suspected drugs (vancomycin, voriconazole, acyclovir, ganciclovir, fluconazole, and oseltamivir) were associated with DIA. The multivariate linear regression model revealed that nine drugs (vancomycin, meropenem, voriconazole, ganciclovir, fluconazole, oseltamivir, compound borax solution, palonosetron, and polyene phosphatidylcholine) and four drugs (vancomycin, voriconazole, ganciclovir, and fluconazole) were found to be associated with DIN and DIA, respectively. While logistic regression analysis revealed that palonosetron and ganciclovir were associated with DIN and DIA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Palonosetron and ganciclovir were found to be correlated with drug-induced granulocytopenia. The results of this study provide an early warning of drug safety signals for drug-induced granulocytopenia, facilitating a quick and appropriate response for clinicians.

Cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin therapy for CMV retinitis post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: To report a case of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis complicated with ganciclovir-related myelosuppression, which was successfully managed with intravenous (IV) ganciclovir and CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) therapy. METHODS: Observational case report. RESULTS: A 51-year-old male with follicular type non-Hodgkin lymphoma post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) developed vision-threatening retinitis. polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the aqueous humour showed positive for CMV. Despite myelosuppression occurred during IV ganciclovir therapy, the retinitis resolved and intraocular CMV viral load significantly improved after CMVIG therapy. CONCLUSION: Combined IV ganciclovir treatment and CMVIG therapy can significantly improve visual outcome and reduce intraocular CMV viral load in vision-threatening CMV retinitis.

Ganciclovir-induced mutations are present in a diverse spectrum of post-transplant malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Ganciclovir (GCV) is widely used in solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus. It has long been considered a mutagen and carcinogen. However, the contribution of GCV to cancer incidence and other factors that influence its mutagenicity remains unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analysed genomics data for 121,771 patients who had undergone targeted sequencing compiled by the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) or Foundation Medicine (FM). A statistical approach was developed to identify patients with GCV-associated mutational signature (GCVsig) from targeted sequenced data of tumour samples. Cell line exposure models were further used to quantify mutation burden and DNA damage caused by GCV and other antiviral and immunosuppressive drugs. RESULTS: Mutational profiles from 22 of 121,771 patient samples in the GENIE and FM cohorts showed evidence of GCVsig. A diverse range of cancers was represented. All patients with detailed clinical history available had previously undergone solid organ transplantation and received GCV and mycophenolate treatment. RAS hotspot mutations associated with GCVsig were present in 9 of the 22 samples, with all samples harbouring multiple GCV-associated protein-altering mutations in cancer driver genes. In vitro testing in cell lines showed that elevated DNA damage response and GCVsig are uniquely associated with GCV but not acyclovir, a structurally similar antiviral. Combination treatment of GCV with the immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), increased the misincorporation of GCV in genomic DNA and mutations attributed to GCVsig in cell lines and organoids. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, GCV can cause a diverse range of cancers. Its mutagenicity may be potentiated by other therapies, such as mycophenolate, commonly co-prescribed with GCV for post-transplant patients. Further investigation of the optimal use of these drugs could help reduce GCV-associated mutagenesis in post-transplant patients.

Risk Factors for Erythrocytosis in Renal Transplantation: Is Ganciclovir Therapy One of Them?

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence and risk factors of post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) and its relationship with cytomegalovirus (CMV). MATERIAL AND METHODS The study consisted of patients who received a kidney allograft and followed-up in our nephrology transplantation clinic from 2000 to 2014. Patient age, sex, length of dialysis, etiology of end-stage kidney disease, date of transplantation, medications, types of donors, the development of PTE were recorded. RESULTS Among 185 adult kidney recipients, 43 (23.2%) had PTE. The average time between transplantation and diagnosis was 36 months. PTE was more common in male patients (P<0.05) and patients with living donors and those who had been treated with ganciclovir after transplantation (P<0.05). There were 79 patients treated for CMV - 54 in the non-PTE group and 24 in the PTE group. There was no significant difference in patient age, etiology of end-stage kidney disease, and immunosuppressive therapy when comparing the PTE group and non-PTE group. Univariate analysis showed ganciclovir therapy was significantly associated with PTE. However, this was not seen in the multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with ganciclovir can precipitate development of PTE. Prospective studies are needed to assess the association of between PTE and CMV infection, valganciclovir, and ganciclovir.

Efficacy and Safety of Antiviral Agents in Preventing Allograft Rejection Following CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Many antiviral agents have been studied in clinical trials for allograft rejection prevention following cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients. However, data on the most effective and safest treatment are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to rank CMV prophylaxis agents for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant patients according to their efficacy and safety. We conducted searches on the MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases, as well as the reference lists of selected studies up to December 2021, for published and peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of CMV prophylaxis agents in high-risk kidney transplant patients. Thirteen studies were independently selected by three reviewers and included post-kidney transplant patients indicated for CMV prophylaxis who had been randomized to receive prophylactic antiviral agents or standard of care. The reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies, and direct and network meta-analyses were applied to assess the study outcomes. The probability of efficacy and safety was evaluated, and the drugs were assigned a numerical ranking. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The primary outcome was an incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, whereas the secondary outcome was a composite of major adverse drug reactions. Each outcome referred to the definition provided in the original studies. Valganciclovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir were identified to significantly decrease the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with pooled risk differences (RDs) of -20.53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -36.09% to -4.98%), -19.3% (95% CI = -32.7% to -5.93%), and -10.4% (95% CI = -19.7% to -0.12%), respectively. The overall major adverse drug reaction was 5.7% without a significant difference when compared with placebo. Valganciclovir had the best combined efficacy and safety among the examined antiviral agents and was the most effective and safest antiviral agent overall for allograft rejection prevention following CMV prophylaxis. Valacyclovir was the optimal alternative antiviral agent for patients who were unable to tolerate intravenous ganciclovir or access oral valganciclovir as financial problem. However, compliance and dose-related toxicities should be closely monitored.

Risk Assessment of Neutropenia during Low-Dose Valganciclovir Prophylaxis for Heart Transplant Recipients.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether low-dose valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increased the risk of developing neutropenia in heart transplant recipients (HTRs). Forty-three HTRs receiving VGCV were divided into two groups: those who received VGCV prophylaxis (n = 22) and those who did not (n = 21). Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count ˂1500/µL and was monitored for approximately one year post-transplantation. In the prophylaxis group, 77.3% (17/22) of HTRs experienced neutropenia, which was significantly higher than that in the no prophylaxis group (42.9% [9/21], p = 0.031). No significant differences in the duration of VGCV administration and cumulative dose up to the first neutropenia episode were observed between the groups. Meanwhile, the cumulative dose of mycophenolate mofetil was significantly higher in the prophylaxis group than in the no prophylaxis group (p = 0.018); the daily maintenance dose and regularly measured area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid did not significantly differ between groups. In conclusion, the risk of developing neutropenia was higher in HTRs receiving low-dose VGCV prophylaxis than it was in those not receiving prophylaxis, probably not attributed to dosing period and cumulative dose of VGCV until the onset of neutropenia.

Assessment of mitochondrial toxicity in newborns and infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection treated with valganciclovir.

BACKGROUND: Ganciclovir/valganciclovir is currently indicated during the first 6 months of life in symptomatic children with congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, this treatment may have the potential to induce mitochondrial toxicity due to off-target inhibition of DNA-polymerases. Similar anti-HIV drugs have been associated with mitochondrial toxicity but this has never been explored in CMV. OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential mitochondrial toxicity profile at the genetic, functional and biogenesis level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a cohort of newborns and infants with symptomatic congenital CMV infection (treated with valganciclovir, untreated and uninfected controls). DESIGN: Longitudinal, observational and controlled study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Subjects were recruited at the tertiary referral Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and experiments were conducted at IDIBAPS-Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Spain. CMV-infected newborns underwent comprehensive monthly clinical follow-up. METHODS: Mitochondrial parameters, audiometry and neurological assessment were measured at baseline, 3-6 and 12 months after inclusion in the study. The Kruskal-Wallis test for k-independent samples and Friedman tests for repeated measurements were applied. RESULTS: Complex IV, citrate synthase enzymatic activities and mtDNA remained preserved in congenital CMV-infected infants treated with valganciclovir compared with controls (p>0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of mitochondrial toxicity was found in infants treated with valganciclovir for congenital CMV.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valganciclovir and Ganciclovir in Transplantation.

Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are first choice drugs for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Only a few studies on the pharmacokinetics and exposure/efficacy or exposure/safety relationships of ganciclovir and valganciclovir in transplant recipients have been published so far, and there are still controversies about the exposure parameter to use for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We performed an extensive literature review of the clinical pharmacokinetics data, the exposure/effect relationships in terms of efficacy and safety, and the available tools for valganciclovir and ganciclovir TDM in adults and pediatrics transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir is well described in adults and children, and a high interindividual variability is commonly observed. In contrast, the drug pharmacodynamics has been poorly described in adults and barely in children. The average 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24h ) seems to be the best predictor of efficacy and toxicity. The benefit of TDM remains controversial in adult patients but should be considered in children due to higher interindividual variability and lower probability of target attainment. Several bayesian estimators based on limited sampling strategies have been developed with this aim and may be used in clinical practice for the AUC-based individual dose adjustment of ganciclovir and valganciclovir.

Comparison of standard versus low-dose valganciclovir regimens for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk liver transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two valganciclovir (VGCV) institutional dosing protocols for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in liver transplant (LT) recipients with CMV serotype donor +/recipient- (D+/R-). METHODS: This was a single-center review of CMV D+/R- adult LT recipients who received VGCV 450 mg/day for 90 days (low-dose) or VGCV 900 mg/day for 180 days (standard-dose). The primary outcome was incidence of CMV disease at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included rates of CMV syndrome, end-organ disease, breakthrough infection, and resistance. Neutropenia, early discontinuation of VGCV, growth colony stimulating factors use (G-CSF), biopsy-proven rejection (BPAR), graft loss, and death at 1 year were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-six CMV D+/R- LT recipients were included. Although no difference in CMV disease was observed (low-dose 26% vs. standard-dose 23%, p = 0.71), 75% of CMV infections in the low-dose group presented with end-organ disease. Ganciclovir (GCV) resistance was observed only in the low-dose group (n = 2). Significantly more patients in the standard-dose group developed neutropenia (low-dose 10% vs 60% standard-dose, p < 0.001). In the standard-dose group, 29% required early discontinuation of VGCV (vs. 5% in the low-dose group, p < 0.001), and 20% were treated with G-CSF. Both cohorts had similar rates of BPAR, graft loss, and death at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: VGCV 900 mg/day for 180 days had higher rates of hematologic adverse effects resulting in frequent treatment interruptions. However, the occurrence of two cases of GCV-resistant CMV disease raises concerns about routinely using low-dose VGCV prophylaxis.

Does ganciclovir exert retinal toxicity after multiple continuous intravitreal injections?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to report a case of acute retinal necrosis in which abnormalities in visual function did not correspond to retinal anatomical outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old female diagnosed with acute retinal necrosis underwent repeated (nine rounds) intravitreal ganciclovir injection (3 mg/0.1 ml) into the left eye, one injection every 2 weeks. During the therapy, the patient noticed her visual acuity declining gradually. The best corrected visual acuity in the left eye was 20/33. The visual field showed massive visual damage. There was no posterior necrotizing involvement, no macular edema or exudation, and only slight abnormity of the interdigitation zone in the fovea area was visible on OCT. Angio-OCT revealed normal capillary density of three retinal capillary and choriocapillaris layers. The visually evoked potential was normal. The photopic single-flash response showed a declined amplitude of a-wave and b-wave. The amplitudes of photopic 30 Hz flicker were decreased. Multifocal electroretinography revealed macular dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Ganciclovir-associated photoreceptor damage may induce abnormalities in retinal function in response to multiple continuous intravitreal ganciclovir injections at a relatively high dosage (3 mg/0.1 ml).