Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 6.182
Filter
1.
J Vet Intern Med ; 36(4): 1416-1421, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546514

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of a single intramuscular adminsitration of long-acting omeprazole (LA-OMEP) in increasing gastric pH in dogs. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that LA-OMEP would meet in healthy dogs the clinical goals defined for human patients for treatment of gastroduodenal ulceration. ANIMALS: Nine healthy research dogs. METHODS: Prospective experimental study. Dogs were given a 4 mg/kg intramuscular injection of LA-OMEP. Intragastric pH was continuously recorded on treatment days 0 to 7. Daily mean pH and mean percentage time (MPT) intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 were determined. RESULTS: The mean onset of action for the LA-OMEP was 98.11 min (SD 46.39). The mean number of days the dogs' pH met established goals for MPT pH ≥3 was 5.5 days (range, 3-7) and 5.25 days for MPT pH ≥4 (range, 3-7). Long-acting omeprazole met the human clinical goals pH ≥3 for 72 hours in 8/8 of the dogs and MPT pH ≥4 for 96 hours in 7/8 of dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The LA-OMEP formulation produced gastric acid suppression in healthy dogs for an average of 5 days and up to 7 days, after a single intramuscular injection. No major adverse effects were observed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents , Omeprazole , Animals , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Famotidine , Gastric Acidity Determination/veterinary , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Prospective Studies
2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 35(2): 887-891, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33586200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enteric-coated omeprazole capsules are commonly used as a gastric acid suppressant in dogs. However, the efficacy of this formulation has not been evaluated for clinical use in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a 10 mg PO omeprazole capsule (TriviumVet) undergoing FDA approval to increase gastric pH in dogs. We hypothesized that encapsulated omeprazole would significantly increase the gastric pH compared to placebo and reach pH goals extrapolated from people for the treatment of esophagitis and duodenal ulceration. ANIMALS: Six healthy research dogs. METHODS: Randomized, blinded, 2-way crossover study. Dogs were PO administered omeprazole at 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg or placebo (empty gelatin capsules) twice-daily for 5 days. The intragastric pH was recorded on days 2 to 5 of treatment. Mean pH and the mean percentage time (MPT) intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 were compared between and within treatment groups. RESULTS: Dogs treated with omeprazole had a significantly higher MPT ± SD intragastric pH ≥3 (91.2% ± 11.0%), ≥4 (86.9% ± 13.7%) and mean ± SD pH (5.4 ± 0.8) than dogs treated with placebo (19.7% ± 15.5%, 28.3 ± 20.7, and 2.4 ± 1.0, respectively) (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The 10 mg enteric-coated omeprazole capsule PO administered evaluated in this study is an effective gastric acid suppressant in healthy dogs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents , Omeprazole , Animals , Capsules , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Gastric Acidity Determination/veterinary , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Prospective Studies
3.
Surg Today ; 51(10): 1568-1576, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491102

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify the factors that affect laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) treatment efficacy in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (e-GERD) esophagitis, based on the findings of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) and high-resolution manometry (HRM). METHODS: The subjects were 102 patients with e-GERD diagnosed by endoscopy, who underwent LF as the initial surgery. To analyze the findings of MII-pH and HRM, the patients were divided into two groups: a cured group (CR), comprised of patients whose esophagitis was cured postoperatively; and a recurrence group (RE), comprised of patients who suffered recurrent esophagitis. RESULTS: There were 96 patients in the CR group and 6 in the RE group. MII-pH indicated that the acid reflux time, the longest reflux time, and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min, were significantly higher in the RE group than in the CR group (p = 0.0028, p = 0.0008, p = 0.012, respectively). The HRM indicated that only the distal contractile integral (DCI) was significantly lower in the RE group (p = 0.0109). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that esophageal clearance may affect the treatment outcome of LF. Based on the findings of MII-pH, the longest reflux time and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min were important factors influencing the therapeutic effect, whereas based on the HRM, the DCI value was most important.


Subject(s)
Esophagitis, Peptic/physiopathology , Esophagitis, Peptic/surgery , Esophagus/physiopathology , Fundoplication/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Adult , Aged , Cyclosporine , Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis , Esophagitis, Peptic/pathology , Esophagus/pathology , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination , Humans , Male , Manometry/methods , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
4.
Anticancer Res ; 41(2): 811-819, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The GastroPanel® test (Biohit Oyj) is interpreted by the GastroSoft® application distinguishing eight biomarker profiles, of which five profiles have a morphological equivalent in the Updated Sydney System (USS) classification of gastritis, and 3 others specify functional disorders of the stomach: 1) high acid output, 2) low acid output, and 3) effects of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication. This study evaluated the prevalence of these biomarker profiles in dyspeptic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to assess the point prevalence of these biomarker profiles in a random sample of 500 subjects derived from our archives of GastroPanel® samples. RESULTS: Reflux symptoms were reported by 35.2% and use of PPI medication by 36.8% of the study subjects. Biomarker profile 2 (high acid output) was the second most common GastroPanel® profile in this cohort; 31.2%, second only (33.6%) to profile 1 (healthy stomach). Hp-infection was detected in 25.0% of the subjects. Profiles related to use of PPI (low acid output, PPI effect) were found in 7.4% of the cases. AG was uncommon, diagnosed in 14 patients only (2.8%). CONCLUSION: These data are derived from the population with the highest frequency of dyspepsia, and the results might have widespread implications in diagnostic and screening practices.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia/drug therapy , Gastritis, Atrophic/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyspepsia/etiology , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastritis, Atrophic/epidemiology , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Serologic Tests
5.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 33(4): e14029, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33377596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations. KEY RESULTS: Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.


Subject(s)
Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastric Acid , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Population Surveillance/methods , Asia/epidemiology , Electric Impedance , Esophageal pH Monitoring/standards , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Germany/epidemiology , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Manometry/methods , Manometry/standards , Reference Values , Turkey/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
7.
J Physiol Pharmacol ; 71(4)2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214338

ABSTRACT

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a neuromodulator in the central nervous system. The physiological function of H2S in the nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS) has rarely been reported. This research aimed to explore the role of H2S in regulating gastric functions. Wistar rats were randomly assigned to sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS; 4 and 8 nmol) groups, physiological saline (PS) group, capsazepine (10 pmol) + NaHS (4 nmol) group, L703606 (4 nmol) + NaHS (4 nmol) group, and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (4 nmol) + NaHS (4 nmol) group. The pH values of gastric acid were measured using a pH meter pre- and post-injection. It was found that the microinjetion of NaHS (4 and 8 nmol), an exogenous H2S donor, into the NTS (n = 6) remarkably decreased the pH values of gastric juice. The inductive effect of NaHS on gastric juice production could be suppressed by capsazepine (a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist), L703606 (a NK1 receptor antagonist) and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (a nuclear fator-κB inhibitor). However, the same amount of PS did not induce any significant change in the pH value of gastric acid (P > 0.05). The findings of this study revealed that NaHS within the NTS remarkably promoted gastric acid secretion via the activation of TRPV1 channels and nuclear factor-κB-dependent mechanism in rats.


Subject(s)
Gasotransmitters/metabolism , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/innervation , Hydrogen Sulfide/metabolism , Solitary Nucleus/drug effects , Sulfides/pharmacology , Animals , Gastric Acidity Determination , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Neurokinin-1/metabolism , Secretory Pathway , Solitary Nucleus/metabolism , Sulfides/metabolism , TRPV Cation Channels/metabolism
8.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 11(7): e00190, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32764206

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are highly toxic and induce inflammation. Therefore, we investigated both the LPS activity and composition of GNB in the gastric fluid (GF) to assess the potential toxicity of them accumulated in the stomach. METHODS: GF and saliva samples were obtained from 158 outpatients who were undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 36 volunteers using a nasogastric tube. The LPS activity was measured by assay kits including recombinant Factor C or Limulus amebocyte lysate. To assess the bacterial composition in the samples, a 16S ribosomal DNA-based operational taxonomic unit analysis was performed. We focused on the genera representing >0.1% of the whole microbiota. RESULTS: We found a high LPS activity in the GF samples with weak acidity (approximately > pH 4), whereas little/no activity in those with strong acidity (approximately < pH 2). Spearman test also demonstrated a close correlation between pH and LPS in those samples (r = 0.872). The relative abundance of GNB in the saliva showed no significant difference between the subject groups with weak- and strong-acidity GF. In addition, in the subjects whose GF acidity was weak, the GNB abundance in the GF was almost the same as that in the saliva. By contrast, in the subjects whose GF acidity was strong, the GNB abundance in the GF was significantly lower than that in the saliva. DISCUSSION: GNB that have recently moved from the oral cavity might account for the prominent LPS activity in a stomach with weak acidity.


Subject(s)
Gastric Juice/chemistry , Gastric Mucosa/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Lipopolysaccharides/analysis , Aged , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastric Juice/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/metabolism , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lipopolysaccharides/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Mucosa/microbiology , Saliva/chemistry , Saliva/microbiology
9.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 21(7): 581-589, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32633112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of postprandial proximal gastric acid pockets (PPGAPs) and their association with gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). METHODS: Fifteen patients with BE (defined by columnar lined esophagus of ≥1 cm) and 15 healthy individuals that were matched for age, gender, and body mass index, were recruited. The fasting intragastric pH and the appearance time, length, lowest pH, and mean pH of the PPGAP were determined using a single pH electrode pull-through experiment. For BE patients, a gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) was completed and esophageal 24-h pH monitoring was carried out. RESULTS: The PPGAP was significantly longer (5 (3, 5) cm vs. 2 (1, 2) cm) and the lowest pH (1.1 (0.8, 1.5) vs. 1.6 (1.4, 1.9)) was significantly lower in patients with short-segment BE than in healthy individuals. The PPGAP started to appear proximally from the gastroesophageal pH step-up point to the esophageal lumen. The acidity of the PPGAP was higher in the distal segment than in the proximal segment. In short-segment BE patients, there were significant correlations between the acidity and the appearance time and length of the PPGAP. The length and acidity of the PPGAP were positively associated with gastroesophageal acid reflux episodes. The acidity of the PPGAP was associated with the DeMeester scores, the GerdQ scores, and the fasting intragastric pH. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with short-segment BE, a PPGAP is commonly seen. Its length and acidity of PPGAP are associated with gastroesophageal acid reflux, the DeMeester score, and the GerdQ score in patients with short-segment BE.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastroesophageal Reflux/metabolism , Postprandial Period/physiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
10.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 39(2): 165-170, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32388711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not respond to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine the findings on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-h pH recording in patients with typical GERD symptoms, refractory to PPI treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database of patients referred for HREM and 24-h pH recording was done. We selected patients who were referred for evaluation of refractory GERD symptoms despite > 8 weeks of at least once-daily PPI treatment. Details noted were demographic profile, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy report, HREM findings and 24-h pH findings. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients had symptoms of GERD that were refractory to PPI therapy. Seven patients (7.1%) were diagnosed having diseases mimicking GERD: eosinophilic esophagitis (n=2), supragastric belching (n=4) and rumination (n=1). After excluding these patients and those with insufficient data, the final study cohort included 82 cases. Fifty patients (61%) had normal motility. Major motility disorders were detected in 8 (9.75%) patients: achalasia cardia (6) and distal esophageal spasm (2). Ineffective esophageal motility was noted in 24 patients. A total of 74 patients underwent 24-h pH testing. Significant acid reflux with good symptom correlation was noted in 56 patients. Eighteen patients did not have significant acid reflux (Johnson-DeMeester score < 14.7): hypersensitive esophagus (12) and functional heartburn (6). CONCLUSION: Fifty-six patients (68.3%) had definite diagnosis of GERD and 31.7% (26) had non-GERD conditions like motility disorders, functional heartburn and hypersensitive esophagus.


Subject(s)
Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Manometry/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure , Young Adult
11.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 160(3): 858-866, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928822

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ARS has been adopted in select patients with lung transplant for the past 2 decades in many centers. Outcomes have been reported sporadically. No pooled analysis of retrospective series has been performed. OBJECTIVE: This review and pooled analysis sought to demonstrate objective evidence of improved graft function in lung transplant patients undergoing antireflux surgery (ARS). METHODS: In accordance with Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, a search of PubMed Central, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Articles documenting spirometry data pre- and post-ARS were reviewed and a random-effects model meta-analysis was performed on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) values and the rate of change of FEV1. RESULTS: Six articles were included in the meta-analysis. Regarding FEV1 before and after ARS, we observed a small increase in FEV1 values in studies reporting raw values (2.02 ± 0.89 L/1 sec vs 2.14 ± 0.77 L/1 sec; n = 154) and % of predicted (77.1% ± 22.1% vs 81.2% ± 26.95%; n = 45), with a small pooled Cohen d effect size of 0.159 (P = .114). When considering the rate of change of FEV1 we observed a significant difference in pre-ARS compared with post-ARS (-2.12 ± 2.76 mL/day vs +0.05 ± 1.19 mL/day; n = 103). There was a pooled effect size of 1.702 (P = .013), a large effect of ARS on the rate of change of FEV1 values. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies demonstrates that ARS might benefit patients with declining FEV1, by examining the rate of change of FEV1 during the pre- and postoperative periods.


Subject(s)
Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Lung Transplantation , Allografts , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/prevention & control , Gastric Acidity Determination , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Respiratory Function Tests
12.
Am J Perinatol ; 37(4): 415-420, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30780184

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The use of acid suppression therapies in newborns lacks efficacy and is associated with adverse effects. Point-of-care (POC) assessment of gastric aspirate pH may provide an objective, noninvasive measure of gastric acidity in tube fed infants. We conducted the present study to characterize the POC gastric pH levels in gastric tube fed infants before and after initiation of enteral omeprazole or ranitidine. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of infants with gastric aspirate pH levels determined by POC pH strips. Gastric pH levels recorded during 7 days before and 14 days after medication initiation were compared using Wilcoxon's sign-rank tests. RESULTS: Among 307 evaluated infants, 284 (92%) had a median gastric pH level ≥4 in 7 days prior to ranitidine or omeprazole. In 14 days after medication initiation, the median gastric pH of infants with pretreatment median gastric pH < 4 increased to 4.5 and 5 (p < 0.01) in the ranitidine and omeprazole groups, respectively. There was no change in infants with pretreatment median gastric pH ≥4. CONCLUSION: Among infants receiving gastric tube feedings and enteral omeprazole or ranitidine, only those with a pretreatment gastric pH level <4 demonstrated a significant increase in gastric pH. Validation of our findings against esophageal pH multichannel intraluminal impedance testing is needed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Enteral Nutrition , Gastric Acidity Determination , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration/drug effects , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Point-of-Care Testing , Ranitidine/pharmacology , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Care , Female , Gastric Acid/physiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intubation, Gastrointestinal , Male , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Ranitidine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
13.
J Med Microbiol ; 68(12): 1771-1786, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31613203

ABSTRACT

Introduction. There is an ever present need to isolate and characterize indigenous bacterial strains with potential probiotic health benefits for humans.Aim. Lactobacillus fermentum of dairy origin was focused because of its propensity to adhere to the intestinal glycoprotein, mucin.Methodology. The lactobacillus strains were screened for mucin adhesion, resistance to low pH and bile, autoaggregation, hydrophobicity, and survival in an in vitro digestion model. The cholesterol-lowering and oxalate-degrading effects of selected strains were also determined. Safety was assessed for haemolytic, mucinolytic and gelatinase activity, biogenic amine production, antibiotic resistance and phenol resistance. Expression of the 32-mmub adhesion-related gene was also measured following strain exposure to simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) digestion.Results. The selected mucin-adhesive strains were tolerant to acid (pH 3.0) and bile (0.25 %) and demonstrated >85 % survival following simulated human digestion in the presence of milk. The digestive treatment did not affect the adhesive potential of PL20, and PL27, regardless of the food matrix. The simulated digestion had less effect on their adhesion than on the type strain and it also did not correlate with the mmub gene expression level as determined by qPCR. The selected strains exhibited cholesterol removal (36-44 %) and degraded oxalate (66-55 %). Neither of these strains exhibited undesirable characteristics.Conclusion. These preliminary findings suggest a functionality in the two strains of L. fermentum with high colonization potential on GIT mucosal membranes and possible health-promoting effects. This prima facie evidence suggests the need for further studies to test these probiotic candidates as live biotherapeutic agents in vivo.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Adhesion , Dairy Products/microbiology , Digestion , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Limosilactobacillus fermentum/physiology , Mucins/metabolism , Bile Acids and Salts/pharmacology , Gastric Acidity Determination , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Limosilactobacillus fermentum/drug effects , Limosilactobacillus fermentum/isolation & purification , Probiotics
14.
Pharm Res ; 36(11): 155, 2019 Sep 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of food on gastric pH and the ability of over the counter betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) acid to reacidify gastric pH after food-induced elevations in gastric pH. METHODS: This open-label cross over clinical study (NCT02758015) included 9 subjects who were randomly assigned to one of 16 possible, 4-period cross-over sequences to determine the impact and relationship of food and gastric pH with acid supplementation. Subjects were administered various doses (1500 mg, 3000 mg and 4500 mg) of betaine hydrochloride (BHCl) to determine the ability of acid supplementation to reacidify gastric pH after the elevation of gastric pH caused by the ingestion of food. RESULTS: Following the administration of food and the resulting elevation in gastric pH, time to return to baseline gastric pH levels without acid supplementation was 49.7 ± 14.0 min. Administering 4500 mg of BHCl acid in capsules was able to reacidify gastric pH levels back to baseline following the administration of food in approximately 17.3 ± 5.9 min. AUCpH of each treatment were similar and not statistically different. Mean max pH following the administration of food was 3.20 ± 0.55. CONCLUSION: The ability of food to elevate and maintain gastric pH levels in the presence of acid supplementation was made evident throughout the study. A 4500 mg dose of BHCl was required to reacidify gastric pH after the administration of food. This study details the difficulty faced by clinicians in dosing a poorly soluble, weakly basic drug to patients receiving acid reducing agents where administration with food is recommended to avoid gastric side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02758015.


Subject(s)
Betaine/therapeutic use , Food , Gastric Absorption , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Food-Drug Interactions , Gastric Acidity Determination , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
15.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 31(11): e13694, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449342

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postprandial stationary pH monitoring studies have identified the acid pocket. To what extent a similar pool of acid is present in the fasting state or at night remains however unclear. METHODS: The study was performed in 9 HV without a hiatal hernia. A pH-impedance-pressure catheter was positioned at the Z-line. First, the presence of the acid pocket was monitored under stationary conditions during 2 hours after ingestion of a standardized meal. Thereafter, the equipment was connected to an ambulatory monitoring device for 24-hour recording. RESULTS: Under stationary conditions, a postprandial acid pocket was present in 7 of the 9 HV, from 9 ± 7 minutes after meal onwards during 47 ± 8 minutes. During ambulatory 24-hour monitoring, postprandial acid pockets emerged significantly later, but no differences in duration or position were detected. During nighttime, an acid pool was detected with its proximal border at the level of the cardia, which at later, time points gradually moved to a more distal position. This led to a gradual decrease in nocturnal acid exposure from proximal to distal, a phenomenon that was preceded by a bust of gastric contractions. Nocturnal reflux originated from the cardiac region, and was more acidic in the early compared with late nocturnal period. CONCLUSION: The acid pocket is present in the postprandial period under both stationary and ambulatory conditions. Of interest, at night, a pool of acid can be demonstrated which is periodically shifted more distally. This pool of acid represents the reservoir from which nocturnal reflux originates.


Subject(s)
Esophagogastric Junction/chemistry , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Postprandial Period/physiology , Esophageal pH Monitoring/methods , Gastric Acid/chemistry , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
16.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 57(11): 552-560, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the difference in acid inhibition function among lansoprazole (LPZ), pantoprazole (PPZ), and their respective stereoisomers following single and multiple intravenous doses in healthy Chinese subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dosage groups were set as follows: 30 mg single and multiple intravenous administrations of LPZ or R-LPZ, 40 mg single and multiple intravenous administrations of PPZ or S-PPZ. Subjects received an intravenous infusion of LPZ, R-LPZ, PPZ, or S-PPZ injection in sterile saline solution (100 mL/h, 60 minutes), respectively. The intragastric pH was sampled every second for 24 hours at baseline and for 24 hours after drug administration. The baseline-adjusted pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters include ΔMean (pH), ΔMedian (pH), ΔTpH≥3 (%), ΔTpH≥4 (%), ΔTpH≥6 (%), and ΔAUECph-tτ1-τ2. The PD parameters were evaluated in different time intervals (0 - 24 hours, 0 - 4 hours and 14 - 24 hours). RESULTS: After a single dose, the ΔTpH≥4 (%) of R-LPZ, LPZ, S-PPZ and PPZ was 56.6 ± 19.6, 53.1 ± 23.3, 35.6 ± 24.9 and 26.8 ± 30.2, respectively. The ΔTpH≥6 (%) was 50.7 ± 26.1, 41.4 ± 26.2, 25.4 ± 24.9 and 22.1 ± 27.6, respectively. The ΔAUECph-τ1-τ was 45,564 ± 16,107, 41,798 ± 16,153, 31,914 ± 17,304 and 20,744 ± 21,500, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found with R-LPZ vs. S-PPZ, R-LPZ vs. PPZ, LPZ vs. S-PPZ and LPZ vs. PPZ. The average TpH≥4 of R-LPZ, LPZ, S-PPZ, and PPZ was (47.2 ± 26.1) minutes, (49.6 ± 19.3) minutes, (56.1 ± 23.7) minutes, and (72.1 ± 27.3) minutes, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found with R-LPZ vs. PPZ (p = 0.009) and LPZ vs. PPZ (p = 0.019). After multiple doses, the ΔTpH≥4 (%) of R-LPZ, LPZ, S-PPZ, and PPZ was 71.7 ± 20.2, 63.5 ± 19.4, 59.5 ± 17.8 and 64.0 ± 22.4, respectively. The ΔTpH≥6 (%) was 64.0 ± 22.2, 52.0 ± 19.2, 49.6 ± 20.4 and 50.9 ± 23.8, respectively. The ΔAUECph-τ1-τ was 326,149 ± 94,839, 288,565 ± 93,279, 296,189 ± 83,412 and 300,960 ± 108,057, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in baseline-adjusted PD parameters during all time periods after multiple doses. CONCLUSION: After a single dose, the mean gastric pH inhibition value of R-LPZ was the highest, followed by LPZ, then S-PPZ and PPZ. R-LPZ and LPZ provided significantly better pH control compared with PPZ and S-PPZ in healthy subjects. The onset time of R-LPZ was the fastest and R-LPZ can provide better acid inhibition during sleeping time. After multiple doses, the mean values in all PD parameters of R-LPZ were the highest, the values of LPZ, S-PPZ, and PPZ were similar. However, no significant difference was found in acid inhibition among these four drugs after multiple doses.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Gastric Acidity Determination , Lansoprazole/pharmacology , Pantoprazole/pharmacology , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Stereoisomerism
17.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(11): 2547-2558, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31332820

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies. METHODS: Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded. RESULTS: The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.


Subject(s)
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Duodenal Ulcer/drug therapy , Esomeprazole/administration & dosage , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/adverse effects , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Adult , China , Duodenal Ulcer/diagnosis , Duodenoscopy , Esomeprazole/adverse effects , Esomeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Female , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastric Acidity Determination , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
18.
J Vet Intern Med ; 33(5): 1988-1994, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31294879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Famotidine is sometimes administered as a continuous rate infusion (CRI) to treat gastrointestinal ulceration in critically ill dogs. However, clinical studies have not evaluated the efficacy of a famotidine CRI in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of famotidine at raising intragastric pH when it is administered as a CRI in dogs. We hypothesized that CRI treatment with famotidine would meet clinical goals for raising intragastric pH ≥3 and 4. ANIMALS: Nine healthy Beagle dogs. METHODS: Randomized 2-way crossover. All dogs received 1.0 mg/kg IV q12h famotidine or CRI famotidine at 1.0 mg/kg IV loading dose and 8.0 mg/kg/d for 3 consecutive days. Beginning on day 0 of treatment, intragastric pH monitoring was used to continuously record intragastric pH. Mean percentage times (MPTs) for which intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 were compared between groups using analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference (P < .05) in MPT ≥3 and ≥4 between the CRI and IV q12h groups on all treatment days. On days 1, 2, and 3, the MPTs ± SD for which pH was ≥3 were 92.1 ± 8.5, 96.3 ± 6.2, and 90.0 ± 15.7 for the CRI treatment group and 49.3 ± 27.3, 42.2 ± 19.6, and 45.8 ± 10.1, respectively, for the twice-daily group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These results suggest that a famotidine CRI, but not standard doses of famotidine, achieves the clinical goals established in people to promote healing of gastric tissue injury and offers an alternative to intravenous treatment with proton pump inhibitors in dogs.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous/veterinary , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Dogs , Famotidine/pharmacology , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Famotidine/administration & dosage , Female , Gastric Acidity Determination/veterinary , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic/veterinary , Stomach/drug effects
19.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 1058, 2019 03 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30837470

ABSTRACT

The contrast and sensitivity of in vivo fluorescence imaging has been revolutionized by molecular fluorophores operating in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II; 1000-1700 nm), but an ongoing challenge is the solvatochromism-caused quenching in aqueous solution for the long-wavelength absorbing fluorophores. Herein, we develop a series of anti-quenching pentamethine cyanine fluorophores that significantly overcome the severe solvatochromism, thus affording stable absorption/emission beyond 1000 nm with up to ~ 44-fold enhanced brightness and superior photostability in aqueous solution. These advantages allow for deep optical penetration (8 mm) as well as high-contrast and highly-stable lymphatic imaging superior to clinical-approved indocyanine green. Additionally, these fluorophores exhibit pH-responsive fluorescence, allowing for noninvasive ratiometric fluorescence imaging and quantification of gastric pH in vivo. The results demonstrate reliable accuracy in tissue as deep as 4 mm, comparable to standard pH electrode method. This work unlocks the potential of anti-quenching pentamethine cyanines for NIR-II biological applications.


Subject(s)
Fluorescent Dyes/administration & dosage , Optical Imaging/methods , Animals , Electrodes , Female , Fluorescent Dyes/chemical synthesis , Gastric Acidity Determination/instrumentation , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Injections, Intradermal , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphatic Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred ICR , Mice, Nude , Models, Animal , Optical Imaging/instrumentation , Phantoms, Imaging , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Tissue Distribution
20.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 51(6): 399-408, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907202

ABSTRACT

Helicobacter pylori is a human-specific pathogen with a strict tropism for the gastric mucosa. This bacterium infects around half of the world population and is the main responsible for gastritis, peptic ulcer and, in some cases, for the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Nevertheless, disease development in infected subjects depends not only on the bacterium, but also on the host genetic predisposition and on environmental factors. The fascinating question of how the bacterium can survive in the gastric environment has stimulated research in this field. It is now clear that H. pylori is able to colonize and adhere to the gastric epithelium through several mechanisms, including the breakdown of urea with production of the cell-toxic ammonia. The resulting raise in pH neutralizes acidity of the stomach, thereby allowing the bacterium to safely cross the mucus layer to the epithelial surface. Current challenges regard understanding the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and how to overcome it. Lately, an increasing H. pylori resistance rate to antibiotics has been reported and several molecular bases for this phenomenon described. In this review, we highlight the current knowledge on mechanisms supporting H. pylori resistance to gastric environment and to therapy.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Helicobacter pylori/genetics , Stomach/microbiology , Bacterial Adhesion , Epithelial Cells/microbiology , Gastric Acidity Determination , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/physiology , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Stomach/chemistry , Stomach Neoplasms/microbiology , Urea/metabolism , Virulence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...