History of chronic gastritis: How our perceptions have changed.

Currently, the diagnostic strategy for chronic gastritis (CG) is aimed not just at fixing the presence of gastric mucosal inflammation, but also at gastric cancer (GC) risk stratification in a particular patient. Modern classification approach with the definition of the stage of gastritis determines the need, activities and frequency of dynamic monitoring of a patient. However, this attitude to the patient suffering from CG was far from always. The present publication is a literature review describing the key milestones in the history of CG research, from the description of the first observations of inflammation of the gastric mucosa, assessment of gastritis as a predominantly functional disease, to the advent of endoscopy of the upper digestive tract and diagnostic gastric biopsy, assessment of the role of Helicobacter pylori infection in progression of inflammatory changes to atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and GC.

Changing roles of eosinophils in health and disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review and highlight the unappreciated roles of eosinophils suggested by recent studies. DATA SOURCES: The literature, unpublished observations, and insights by the authors. STUDY SELECTIONS: Basic studies of mouse models and patient-based clinical studies of disease. RESULTS: Eosinophils are often thought of as destructive end-stage effector cells primarily linked to parasite host defense and dysregulated immune responses associated with allergic diseases, such as asthma. However, recent studies (ie, research focused on mechanisms of action and translational studies examining disease/inflammatory pathways) are suggesting far more complex roles for eosinophils. The goal of this review is 3-fold. (1) The authors examine the dynamic history of eosinophils and how physicians over time used this information to formulate defining hypotheses. Particular emphasis is placed on recent studies challenging the parochial view of host defense in favor of roles maintaining homeostasis through immune modulation and tissue remodeling/repair. (2) They discuss diagnostic approaches to assess eosinophils in clinical settings as a means of disease identification and subsequently as a measurement of disease severity. (3) They examine how contemporary views of eosinophils and their perceived roles in diseases have led to specific therapeutic strategies. The emphasis is to review the successes and failures of these strategies as the basis of formulating future clinical studies targeting eosinophils as potential therapies of disease. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexities of eosinophil-mediated activities and the less than overwhelming success of initial attempts targeting these cells, eosinophils remain a potentially important focal target of disease diagnosis and subsequent treatment strategies.

HANS SELYE 70 YEARS LATER: STEROIDS, STRESS ULCERS & H. PYLORI.

Although Hans Selye is mostly known for his discovery & development of the stress concept, he also introduced the first physiologically sound, structure-activity classification of steroids that was also based on the chemical structure of steroids in 1943. He not only introduced the names of glucocorticoids & mineralocorticoids but discovered the anti- & pro-inflammatory properties, respectively, of these steroids in animal models. Furthermore, he not only described the first stress-induced gastric ulcers in rats (1936) & characterized the first human 'stress ulcers' during the air-raids in London during World War 11 (1943). Thus, Selye was a much more productive & creative scientist than it is generally considered.

The Sydney System for classification of gastritis 20 years ago.

The roots of research into gastritis go back into the early decades of the 20th century. Modern aspects of its classification and knowledge of its biological course and consequences were relatively well known even at the time that Helicobcter pylori was discovered by Robin Warren and Barry Marshall in 1982. This discovery, however, significantly changed the field, establishing that the commonest form of gastritis is simply an infectious disease, a finding that raised enormous interest in the subject amongst gastroenterologists, microbiologists, pathologists and basic researchers. However, many of these "new" players in the field often had a limited knowledge of the morphological aspects of gastric inflammations and chronic gastritis. As a consequence in the late 1980's a Working Party was set up to review the biology and natural course of chronic gastritis, to propose a new classification for gastritis, and to provide simple guidelines for reporting the pathology of gastritis in endoscopic biopsies in an attempt to bring uniformity to the subject and facilitate comparative studies in what was to be an era of high research activity. These guidelines, The Sydney System: A New Classification of Gastritis was presented to the World Congress of Gastroenterology in Sydney in 1990, and was later published as six papers in the Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Now, twenty years on, this review looks back on the birth of Sydney System and why it is still important and successful.

Helicobacter pylori and gastritis: Untangling a complex relationship 27 years on.

Since its' introduction by Warren and Marshall 27 years ago, Helicobacter pylori (HP) has become the linchpin in our understanding of important gastric conditions including gastritis, intestinal metaplasia (IM), gastric/duodenal ulcers (GU/DU), Mucosal Associated Lymphoid Tumour (MALToma) and gastric cancer. Initially named Campylobacter pyloridis, it was re-named HP when biochemical and genetic characterization of the organism showed that it was not a member of the Campylobacter genus. The finding in 1983 was seminal. It is now recognized that HP is the most common chronic human bacterial infection and it is the most common cause of gastritis. It is strongly implicated in the development of peptic ulcer disease and gastric neoplasms. In the years since its' discovery, much headway has been made in the understanding of this ubiquitous organism that had remained elusive, with much work focused on eradication, in part driven by pharmaceutical research and development. Standard triple therapy emerged to eradicate HP. However, with the emergence of HP resistance, newer regimes have been put forth that include quadruple therapy, sequential therapy and a dizzying array of other combinations bent on eradicating HP. Much less is known about the natural history of HP, the different faces of HP internationally, HP eradication and its effect on gastritis, IM, GU/DU and gastric cancer. This review will address the changing face of HP in 2011.

Chronic gastritis in former times and now.

The roots of gastritis research stretch far back into the 19th century, and into early decades of the 20th century. Modern aspects in classification of gastritis and knowledge of the biologic course of chronic gastric inflammation, and of the links of chronic gastritis with many important gastric disorders were well known even at time of discovery of Helicobacter pylori in 1982. This discovery, however, significantly changed the field and raised the interest of gastroenterologists in gastritis. Chronic gastritis became a curable disease with known etiology and well-established links to main gastric diseases including gastric cancer. The personal view of the author into this history is presented. Some events and observations which were, in his opinion, noteworthy and important in the story of chronic gastritis have been emphasized.

Evolution of Helicobacter pylori therapy from a meta-analytical perspective.

Even before the discovery of Helicobacter pylori as their cause, chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease were empirically treated with anti-infectious agents. However, it was not until that finding that an antibiotic approach began to be used systematically. The main aim of this article is to review the evolution of H. pylori therapy from a meta-analytical perspective. Initially, antibiotic monotherapy had a minor efficacy on H. pylori. Dual therapy including either bismuth compounds or proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and one antibiotic also resulted in insufficient cure rates. Bismuth-based triple therapy (the first used) and PPI-based triple therapies (combined with two antibiotics, including amoxicillin, nitroimidazole, or clarithromycin) have been the most widely recommended. PPI-based regimens are superior to H2-antagonist-based ones. The influence of the type of PPI, the dose and the duration of the treatment will be discussed. Among the factors influencing the efficacy of therapy, resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole are the most important risk factors for eradication failure. Several rescue therapies can be used. Bismuth-based quadruple therapy is effective, but the complexity of the regimen and the associated adverse effects limit the compliance. PPI-based triple therapy with amoxicillin and levofloxacin is at least equally effective and better tolerated.