Association of Plasma Amyloid, P-Tau, GFAP, and NfL With CSF, Clinical, and Cognitive Features in Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Plasma ß-amyloid-1-42/1-40 (Aß42/40), phosphorylated-tau (P-tau), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (NfL) have been widely examined in Alzheimer disease (AD), but little is known about their reflection of copathologies, clinical importance, and predictive value in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). We aimed to evaluate associations of these biomarkers with CSF amyloid, cognition, and core features in DLB. METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter cohort study with prospective component included individuals with DLB, AD, and healthy controls (HCs), recruited from 2002 to 2020 with an annual follow-up of up to 5 years, from the European-Dementia With Lewy Bodies consortium. Plasma biomarkers were measured by single-molecule array (Neurology 4-Plex E kit). Amyloid status was determined by CSF Aß42 concentrations, and cognition was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Biomarker differences across groups, associations with amyloid status, and clinical core features were assessed by analysis of covariance. Associations with cognitive impairment and decline were assessed by linear regression and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: In our cohort consisting of 562 individuals (HC n = 89, DLB n = 342, AD n = 131; 250 women [44.5%], mean [SD] age of 71 [8] years), sex distribution did not differ between groups. Patients with DLB were significantly older, and had less years of education and worse baseline cognition than HC, but not AD. DLB participants stratified for amyloid status differed significantly in plasma Aß42/40 ratio (decreased in amyloid abnormal: ß = -0.008, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.0003, p = 0.01) and P-tau (increased in amyloid abnormal, P-tau181: ß = 0.246, 95% CI 0.011-0.481; P-tau231: ß = 0.227, 95% CI 0.035-0.419, both p < 0.05), but not in GFAP (ß = 0.068, 95% CI -0.018 to 0.153, p = 0.119), and NfL (ß = 0.004, 95% CI -0.087 to 0.096, p = 0.923) concentrations. Higher baseline GFAP, NfL, and P-tau concentrations were associated with lower MMSE scores in DLB, and GFAP and NfL were associated with a faster cognitive decline (GFAP: annual change of -2.11 MMSE points, 95% CI -2.88 to -1.35 MMSE points, p < 0.001; NfL: annual change of -2.13 MMSE points, 95% CI -2.97 to -1.29 MMSE points, p < 0.001). DLB participants with parkinsonism had higher concentrations of NfL (ß = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.14, p = 0.006) than those without. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests a possible utility of plasma Aß42/40, P-tau181, and P-tau231 as a noninvasive biomarkers to assess amyloid copathology in DLB, and plasma GFAP and NfL as monitoring biomarkers for cognitive symptoms in DLB.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Plasma GFAP in Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in the Clinical Setting of Rapidly Progressive Dementia.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (pl-GFAP) in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) has never been assessed in the clinical setting of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD). Using commercially available immunoassays, we assayed the plasma levels of GFAP, tau (pl-tau), and neurofilament light chain (pl-NfL) and the CSF total tau (t-tau), 14-3-3, NfL, phospho-tau181 (p-tau), and amyloid-beta isoforms 42 (Aß42) and 40 (Aß40) in sCJD (n = 132) and non-prion RPD (np-RPD) (n = 94) patients, and healthy controls (HC) (n = 54). We also measured the CSF GFAP in 67 sCJD patients. Pl-GFAP was significantly elevated in the sCJD compared to the np-RPD and HC groups and affected by the sCJD subtype. Its diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) 0.760) in discriminating sCJD from np-RPD was higher than the plasma and CSF NfL (AUCs of 0.596 and 0.663) but inferior to the 14-3-3, t-tau, and pl-tau (AUCs of 0.875, 0.918, and 0.805). Pl-GFAP showed no association with sCJD survival after adjusting for known prognostic factors. Additionally, pl-GFAP levels were associated with 14-3-3, pl-tau, and pl-NfL but not with CSF GFAP, Aß42/Aß40, and p-tau. The diagnostic and prognostic value of pl-GFAP is inferior to established neurodegeneration biomarkers. Nonetheless, pl-GFAP noninvasively detects neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in sCJD, warranting potential applications in disease monitoring.

Autoimmune encephalitis in glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy.

Autoimmune encephalitis due to glial fibrillar acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy is a rare cause of subacute neuropsychiatric changes. In this case, a young patient presented with a viral prodrome and meningismus, followed by progressive encephalopathy and movement disorders over the span of 2 weeks. Due to his clinical trajectory, inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, initial normal brain imaging and negative serum autoimmune encephalopathy panel, his initial diagnosis was presumed viral meningoencephalitis. The recurrence and progression of neuropsychiatric symptoms and myoclonus despite antiviral treatment prompted further investigation, inclusive of testing for CSF autoimmune encephalopathy autoantibodies, yielding a clinically meaningful, positive GFAP autoantibody. This case highlights the importance of appropriately testing both serum and CSF autoantibodies when an autoimmune encephalitic process is considered. Through this case, we review the clinical and radiographic manifestations of GFAP astrocytopathy, alongside notable pearls pertaining to this autoantibody syndrome and its management.

Diagnostic value of isolated plasma biomarkers and its combination in neurodegenerative dementias: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Plasma amyloid-ß (Aß), phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181), neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) potentially aid in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias. We aim to conduct a comprehensive comparison between different biomarkers and their combination, which is lacking, in a multicenter Chinese dementia cohort consisting of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). METHODS: We enrolled 92 demented patients [64 AD, 16 FTD, and 12 PSP with dementia] and 20 healthy controls (HC). Their plasma Αß, p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP were detected by highly sensitive-single molecule immunoassays. Αß pathology in patients was measured by cerebrospinal fluid or/and amyloid positron emission tomography. RESULTS: All plasma biomarkers tested were significantly altered in dementia patients compared with HC, especially Aß42/Aß40 and NfL showed significant performance in distinguishing AD from HC. A combination of plasma Aß42/Aß40, p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP could discriminate FTD or PSP well from HC and was able to distinguish AD and non-AD (FTD/PSP). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the diagnostic performance of individual plasma biomarkers Aß42/Aß40, p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP in Chinese dementia patients and noted that a combination of these biomarkers may be more accurate in identifying FTD/PSP patients and distinguishing AD from non-AD dementia.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acid protein levels in early and advanced stages of cerebral amyloid Angiopathy.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a biomarker for neuroaxonal damage and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for reactive astrocytosis. Both processes occur in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but studies investigating the potential of NFL and GFAP as markers for CAA are lacking. We aimed to investigate NFL and GFAP as biomarkers for neuroaxonal damage and astrocytosis in CAA. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected between 2010 and 2020 from controls, (pre)symptomatic Dutch-type hereditary (D-CAA) mutation-carriers and participants with sporadic CAA (sCAA) from two prospective CAA studies at two University hospitals in the Netherlands. NFL and GFAP levels were measured with Simoa-assays. The association between NFL and GFAP levels and age, cognitive performance (MoCA), CAA-related MRI markers (CAA-CSVD-burden) and Aß40 and Aß42 levels in CSF were assessed with linear regression adjusted for confounders. The control group was divided in age < 55 and ≥55 years to match the specific groups. RESULTS: We included 187 participants: 28 presymptomatic D-CAA mutation-carriers (mean age 40 years), 29 symptomatic D-CAA participants (mean age 58 years), 59 sCAA participants (mean age 72 years), 33 controls < 55 years (mean age 42 years) and 38 controls ≥ 55 years (mean age 65 years). In presymptomatic D-CAA, only GFAP in CSF (7.7*103pg/mL vs. 4.4*103pg/mL in controls; P<.001) was increased compared to controls. In symptomatic D-CAA, both serum (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.008, GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 123.4pg/mL; P=0.027) and CSF (NFL:16.8*102pg/mL vs. 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.01 and GFAP:11.4*103pg/mL vs. 7.5*103pg/mL; P<.001) levels were higher than in controls and serum levels (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 6.7pg/mL; P=0.05 and GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 66.0pg/mL; P=0.004) were higher than in pre-symptomatic D-CAA. In sCAA, only NFL levels were increased compared to controls in both serum (25.6pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.005) and CSF (20.0*102pg/mL vs 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.008). All levels correlated with age. Serum NFL correlated with MoCA (P=0.008) and CAA-CSVD score (P<.001). NFL and GFAP in CSF correlated with Aß42 levels (P=0.01/0.02). CONCLUSIONS: GFAP level in CSF is an early biomarker for CAA and is increased years before symptom onset. NFL and GFAP levels in serum and CSF are biomarkers for advanced CAA.

Matching proposed clinical and MRI criteria of aggressive multiple sclerosis to serum and cerebrospinal fluid markers of neuroaxonal and glial injury.

BACKGROUND: Definitions of aggressive MS employ clinical and MR imaging criteria to identify highly active, rapidly progressing disease courses. However, the degree of overlap between clinical and radiological parameters and biochemical markers of CNS injury is not fully understood. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to match clinical and MR imaging hallmarks of aggressive MS to serum/CSF markers of neuroaxonal and astroglial injury (neurofilament light chain (sNfL, cNfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP, cGFAP)). METHODS: We recruited 77 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 22 patients with clinically isolated syndrome. NfL and GFAP levels in serum and CSF were assessed using a single-molecule-array HD-1-analyzer. A general linear model with each biomarker as a dependent variable was computed. Clinical and imaging criteria of aggressive MS, as recently proposed by the ECTRIMS Consensus Group, were modeled as independent variables. Other demographic, clinical or laboratory parameters, were modeled as covariates. Analyses were repeated in a homogenous subgroup, consisting only of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve RRMS patients presenting with an acute relapse. RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates and multiplicity of testing, sNfL and cNfL concentrations were strongly associated with the presence of ≥2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (psNfL = 0.00008; pcNfL = 0.004) as well as the presence of infratentorial lesions on MRI (psNfL = 0.0003; pcNfL < 0.004). No other clinical and imaging criteria of aggressive MS correlated significantly with NfL or GFAP in serum and CSF. In the more homogeneous subgroup, sNfL still was associated with the presence of ≥2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (psNfL = 0.001), presence of more than 20 T2-lesions (psNfL = 0.049) as well as the presence of infratentorial lesions on MRI (psNfL = 0.034), while cNfL was associated with the presence of ≥2 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (psNfL = 0.011) and presence of more than 20 T2-lesions (psNfL = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Among proposed risk factors for an aggressive disease course, MRI findings but not clinical characteristics correlated with sNfL and cNfL as a marker of neuroaxonal injury and should be given appropriate weight considering MS prognosis and therapy. No significant correlation was detected for GFAP alone.

Brain radial enhancement pattern in patients with negative glial fibrillary acidic protein-IgG: A cases series study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Brain radial enhancement pattern on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been identified as typical lesions in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP-A). However, the authors encountered several patients without GFAP-IgG showing that such specific imaging. In the present study, we reported the clinical pictures of 5 GFAP-IgG-negative patients with GFAP-A specific imaging pattern. METHODS: Data was retrospectively obtained from June 2013 through April 2023, and five GFAP-IgG-negative patients with valid data were recruited. Clinical information was either obtained by the investigators or retrieved from the referring clinicians and included prodromal symptoms, neurologic manifestations, comorbidities, results of ancillary studies. RESULTS: Altogether five GFAP-IgG-negative patients with "meningoencephalitis/encephalitis" manifestations and brain radial perivascular enhancement were confirmed. One patient had peripheral lymphoma. Four patients had other autoimmune antibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid, of which one patient had positive aquaporin IgG. Clinical features of the five patients included headache, fever, epilepsy and abnormal behavioral symptoms. MRI of patients revealed radial perivascular gadolinium enhancement extending from the lateral ventricles to the white matter suggestive of autoimmune GFAP-A. CONCLUSION: GFAP-A-like disorders with radial perivascular enhancement could be found in GFAP-IgG-negative patients with or without neoplasm, which could provide new insight into the differential diagnosis of GFAP-A.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid brain damage markers neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein correlate with tick-borne encephalitis disease severity-a multicentre study on Lithuanian and Swedish patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to examine the correlation between biomarkers of neuronal and glial cell damage and severity of disease in patients with tick-borne encephalitis. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen patients with tick-borne encephalitis diagnosed in Lithuania and Sweden were prospectively included, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples were obtained shortly after hospitalization. Using pre-defined criteria, cases were classified as mild, moderate or severe tick-borne encephalitis. Additionally, the presence of spinal nerve paralysis (myelitis) and/or cranial nerve affection were noted. Concentrations of the brain cell biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), YKL-40, S100B, neurogranin, neurofilament light (NfL) and tau were analysed in CSF and, in addition, NfL, GFAP and S100B levels were measured in serum. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used for group comparisons of continuous variables and Spearman's partial correlation test was used to adjust for age. RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid and serum concentrations of GFAP and NfL correlated with disease severity, independent of age, and with the presence of nerve paralysis. The markers neurogranin, YKL-40, tau and S100B in CSF and S100B in serum were detected, but their concentrations did not correlate with disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Neuronal cell damage and astroglial cell activation with increased NfL and GFAP in CSF and serum were associated with a more severe disease, independent of age. Increased GFAP and NfL concentrations in CSF and NfL in serum were also indicative of spinal and/or cranial nerve damage. NfL and GFAP are promising prognostic biomarkers in tick-borne encephalitis, and future studies should focus on determining the association between these biomarkers and long-term sequelae.

Emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis.

The advent of highly effective disease modifying therapy has transformed the landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS) care over the last two decades. However, there remains a critical, unmet need for sensitive and specific biomarkers to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and the development of new interventions, particularly for people with progressive disease. This review evaluates the current data for several emerging imaging and liquid biomarkers in people with MS. MRI findings such as the central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions may improve MS diagnostic accuracy and evaluation of therapy efficacy in progressive disease. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of several neuroglial proteins, such as neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein, show potential to be sensitive biomarkers of pathologic processes such as neuro-axonal injury or glial-inflammation. Additional promising biomarkers, including optical coherence tomography, cytokines and chemokines, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicles/exosomes, are also reviewed, among others. Beyond their potential integration into MS clinical care and interventional trials, several of these biomarkers may be informative of MS pathogenesis and help elucidate novel targets for treatment strategies.

Isolated optic neuritis with positive glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy (GFAP-A) has been reported as a spectrum of autoimmune, inflammatory central nervous system disorders. Linear perivascular radial gadolinium enhancement patterns on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a hallmark of these disorders. GFAP-A is associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) GFAP antibody (GFAP-Ab), while the association with serum GFAP-Ab is less clear. This study aimed to observe the clinical characteristic and MRI changes of GFAP-Ab-positive optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational case study at the department of neurology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, from December 2020 to December 2021. The serum of 43 patients and CSF samples of 38 patients with ON were tested for GFAP-Ab by cell-based indirect immune-fluorescence test. RESULTS: Four patients (9.3%) were detected GFAP-Ab positive, and in three out of the four patients, GFAP-Abs were detected only in serum. All of them demonstrated unilateral optic neuritis. Three patients (1, 2, and 4) experienced severe visual loss (best corrected visual acuity ≤ 0.1). Two patients (2 and 4) had experienced more than one episode of ON at the time of sampling. MRI showed optic nerve hyperintensity on T2 FLAIR images in all GFAP-Ab positive patients, and orbital section involvement was the most common. During follow-up (mean 4.5 ± 1 months), only Patient 1 had a recurrent ON, and no patient developed new other neurological events or systemic symptoms. CONCLUSION: GFAP-Ab is rare in patients with ON and may manifest as isolated, relapsing ON. This supports the notion that the GFAP-A spectrum should comprise isolated ON.

Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in the Alzheimer Disease Continuum: Relationship to Other Biomarkers, Differential Diagnosis, and Prediction of Clinical Progression.

BACKGROUND: Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has emerged as a promising biomarker in neurological disorders, but further evidence is required in relation to its usefulness for diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: Plasma GFAP was measured in participants with AD, non-AD neurodegenerative disorders, and controls. Its diagnostic and predictive value were analyzed alone or combined with other indicators. RESULTS: A total of 818 participants were recruited (210 followed). Plasma GFAP was significantly higher in AD than in non-AD dementia and non-demented individuals. It increased in a stepwise pattern from preclinical AD, through prodromal AD to AD dementia. It effectively distinguished AD from controls [area under the curve (AUC) > 0.97] and non-AD dementia (AUC > 0.80) and distinguished preclinical (AUC > 0.89) and prodromal AD (AUC > 0.85) from Aß-normal controls. Adjusted or combined with other indicators, higher levels of plasma GFAP displayed predictive value for risk of AD progression (adjusted hazard radio= 4.49, 95%CI, 1.18-16.97, P = 0.027 based on the comparison of those above vs below average at baseline) and cognitive decline (standard-ß=0.34, P = 0.002). Additionally, it strongly correlated with AD-related cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/neuroimaging markers. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma GFAP effectively distinguished AD dementia from multiple neurodegenerative diseases, gradually increased across the AD continuum, predicted the individual risk of AD progression, and strongly correlated with AD CSF/neuroimaging biomarkers. Plasma GFAP could serve as both a diagnostic and predictive biomarker for AD.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein is a robust biomarker in cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood after traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: Biochemical biomarkers to determine the injury severity and the potential for functional recovery of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) are highly warranted; however, it remains to be clarified whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or peripheral blood (PB) is the ideal sample media. This study aims to measure and compare biomarker concentrations in CSF and PB and to explore associations between biomarker concentrations and injury severity, i.e., American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, and biomarker concentrations and clinical outcome, i.e., AIS grade improvement and Spinal Cord Independent Measure version III (SCIM-III) score. METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, we conducted a single-center prospective pilot study of TSCI patients (n=15) and healthy controls (n=15). Sample collection and clinical outcome assessment were performed at median 13 h [IQR: 19], 9 days [IQR: 2], and 148 days [IQR: 49] after TSCI. Concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE); glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP); neurofilament light chain (NfL); interferon-γ (IFN-γ); interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-13; and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were measured and associated to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The biomarker concentrations were higher in CSF than PB. CSF concentrations of GFAP, NSE, IFN-y, TNF-a, IL-2, IL-12p70, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 and PB concentrations of GFAP and IFN-y were significantly associated with AIS grade, but not with AIS grade improvement or SCIM-III score. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support GFAP as a potential diagnostic biomarker that may be measured in CSF as well as PB.

[Clinical features of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy in children: an analysis of 34 cases]. / 34ä¾‹å°å„¿è‡ªèº«å ç–«æ€§èƒ¶è´¨çº¤ç»´é ¸æ€§è›‹ç™½æ˜Ÿå½¢èƒ¶è´¨ç»†èƒžç— çš„ä¸´åºŠç‰¹å¾åˆ†æž.

OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical features of children with autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (GFAP-A). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 34 children with GFAP-A who attended the Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, from January 2020 to February 2022. The medical data included clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid features, imaging examination results, treatment, and prognosis. RESULTS: The median age of onset was 8.4 (range 1.9-14.9) years for the 34 children with GFAP-A. The main clinical manifestations included headache (50%, 17/34), fever (47%, 16/34), visual impairment (47%, 16/34), and disturbance of consciousness (44%, 15/34). Abnormal cerebrospinal fluid results were observed in 19 children (56%, 19/34), among whom 8 children had positive autoantibody. The children with overlap syndrome had significantly higher recurrence rate and rate of use of immunosuppressant than those without overlap syndrome (P<0.05). About 77% (24/31) of the children had good response to immunotherapy, and only 1 child had poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Children with GFAP-A often have non-specific clinical symptoms and show good response to immunotherapy. Children with overlap syndrome have a high recurrence rate, and early application of immunosuppressants may help to prevent recurrence and alleviate symptoms.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a current review.

INTRODUCTION: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing, often debilitating neuroinflammatory disease, whose predominant clinical manifestations are longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. About 80% of the patients with an NMOSD phenotype have pathogenic autoantibodies against the astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). While therapeutic options for NMOSD have greatly expanded in recent years, well-established biomarkers for prognosis or treatment response are still lacking. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is mainly expressed in astrocytes and can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of patients with NMOSD. AREAS COVERED: Here, we comprehensively review the current knowledge on GFAP as a biomarker in NMOSD. EXPERT OPINION: In patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD, GFAP levels are elevated in CSF and serum during acute attacks and correlate with disability, consistent with the pathophysiology of this antibody-mediated astrocytopathy. Serum GFAP levels tend to be higher in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD than in its differential diagnoses, multiple sclerosis, and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody-associated disease. Importantly, serum GFAP levels in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD during remission may be predictive of future disease activity. Serial serum GFAP measurements are emerging as a biomarker to monitor disease activity in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD and could have the potential for application in clinical practice.

Anti-astrocytic autoantibody patterns in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with depression and psychosis.

Autoimmune astrocytopathy associated with anti-GFAP autoantibodies usually manifests with meningoencephalitis. Here, the first patients with isolated psychiatric syndromes and anti-astrocytic autoantibodies are presented. Patient 1 presented with depression, patient 2 with psychosis. Both patients were found to have novel anti-astrocytic autoantibodies ("GFAP-like") in their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using indirect-immunofluorescence on unfixed murine brain sections; testing for well-characterized anti-GFAP autoantibodies was negative. In patient 1, astrocytic staining was mainly limited to glia limitans, in patient 2, a widespread astrocytic staining was identified. Only patient 1 showed improvement using glucocorticosteroids. These cases suggest an expansion of the clinical spectrum for autoimmune astrocytopathy.

Differences between blood and cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary Acidic protein levels: The effect of sample stability.

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence has shown that the marker of reactive astrogliosis, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), has a stronger relationship with cerebral amyloid beta (Aß) pathology in blood than in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This study investigates if pre-analytical treatment of blood and CSF contribute to these unexpected findings. METHODS: Paired CSF and serum samples from 49 individuals (Aß-negative = 28; Aß-positive = 21) underwent a series of seven freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs). All samples were analyzed for GFAP and neurofilament light (NfL) using single molecule array technology including a fresh unfrozen sample from each patient. RESULTS: FTC significantly affected CSF GFAP concentration (-188.12 pg/ml per FTC) but not serum GFAP. In the same samples, NfL remained stable. Serum GFAP had a higher discrimination of Aß burden than CSF GFAP, irrespective of FTC, which also included unfrozen samples. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates large stability differences of GFAP in CSF and serum. However, this disparity does not seem to fully explain the stronger association of serum GFAP with Aß pathology. Further work should investigate mechanisms of GFAP release into the bloodstream under pathological conditions.

Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy masquerading as tuberculosis of the central nervous system: a case series.

We describe the case history of three patients with meningoencephalitis who were initially treated for presumed tuberculous meningoencephalitis before being diagnosed with autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy. We highlight the overlapping clinical features between autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and tuberculous meningoencephalitis and the challenges in early diagnosis, as both entities respond to an initial course of steroids accompanying antituberculous medications. Early evaluation of GFAP-immunoglobulin G in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients who present with aseptic meningoencephalitis could reveal autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy, which responds favorably to immunotherapy.

CSF GFAP levels in double seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: no evidence of astrocyte damage.

BACKGROUND: Despite rigorous confirmation with reliable assays, some individuals showing the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) phenotype remain negative for both aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether double seronegative NMOSD (DN-NMOSD) and NMOSD with AQP4 antibody (AQP4-NMOSD) share the same pathophysiological basis, astrocytopathy, by measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels as a marker of astrocyte damage. METHODS: Seventeen participants who (1) satisfied the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD, and (2) tested negative for AQP4 and MOG antibodies confirmed with repeated cell-based assays, and (3) had available CSF samples obtained at the point of clinical attacks, were enrolled from 4 medical centers (South Korea, Germany, Thailand, and Denmark). Thirty age-matched participants with AQP4-NMOSD, 17 participants with MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD), and 15 participants with other neurological disorders (OND) were included as controls. The concentration of CSF GFAP was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: CSF GFAP levels in the DN-NMOSD group were significantly lower than those in the AQP4-NMOSD group (median: 0.49 versus 102.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001), but similar to those in the OND (0.25 ng/mL) and MOGAD (0.39 ng/mL) control groups. The majority (90% (27/30)) of participants in the AQP4-NMOSD group showed significantly higher CSF GFAP levels than the highest level measured in the OND group, while no participant in the DN-NMOSD and MOGAD groups did. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that DN-NMOSD has a different underlying pathogenesis other than astrocytopathy, distinct from AQP4-NMOSD.

Neuroinflammation Is Associated with GFAP and sTREM2 Levels in Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: Astrocytes and microglia play an important role in the inflammatory process of multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the associations between the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and soluble triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells-2 (sTREM-2), inflammatory molecules, and clinical characteristics in a group of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Methods: Fifty-one RRMS patients participated in the study. Clinical evaluation and CSF collection were performed at the time of diagnosis. The CSF levels of GFAP, sTREM-2, and of a large set of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules were determined. MRI structural measures (cortical thickness, T2 lesion load, cerebellar volume) were examined. Results: The CSF levels of GFAP and sTREM-2 showed significant correlations with inflammatory cytokines IL-8, G-CSF, and IL-5. Both GFAP and sTREM-2 CSF levels positively correlated with age at diagnosis. GFAP was also higher in male MS patients, and was associated with an increased risk of MS progression, as evidenced by higher BREMS at the onset. Finally, a negative association was found between GFAP CSF levels and cerebellar volume in RRMS at diagnosis. Conclusions: GFAP and sTREM-2 represent suitable biomarkers of central inflammation in MS. Our results suggest that enhanced CSF expression of GFAP may characterize patients with a higher risk of progression.

Dynamics of Selected Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid During Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair - A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious complication of complex aortic repair. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, used to decrease lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure, enables monitoring of CSF biomarkers that may aid in detecting impending SCI. We hypothesized that biomarkers, previously evaluated in traumatic SCI and brain injury, would be altered in CSF over time following complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR). OBJECTIVES: To examine if a chosen cohort of CSF biomarker correlates to SCI and warrants further research. METHODS: A prospective observational study on patients undergoing cEVAR with extensive aortic coverage. Vital parameters and CSF samples were collected on ten occasions during 72 hours post-surgery. A panel of ten biomarkers were analyzed (Neurofilament Light Polypeptide (NFL), Tau, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Soluble Amyloid Precursos Protein (APP) α and ß, Amyloid ß 38, 40 and 42 (Aß38, 40 and 42), Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3LI or YKL-40), Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP).). RESULTS: Nine patients (mean age 69, 7 males) were included. Median total aortic coverage was 68% [33, 98]. One patient died during the 30-day post-operative period. After an initial stable phase for the first few postoperative hours, most biomarkers showed an upward trend compared with baseline in all patients with >50% increase in value for NFL in 5/9 patients, in 7/9 patients for Tau and in 5/9 patients for GFAP. One patient developed spinal cord and supratentorial brain ischemia, confirmed with MRI. In this case, NF-L, GFAP and tau were markedly elevated compared with non-SCI patients (maximum increase compared with baseline in the SCI patient versus mean value of the maximal increase for all other patients: NF-L 367% vs 79%%, GFAP 95608% versus 3433%, tau 1020% vs 192%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests an increase in all ten studied CSF biomarkers after coverage of spinal arteries during endovascular aortic repair. However, the pilot study was not able to establish a specific correlation between spinal fluid biomarker elevation and clinical symptoms of SCI due to small sample size and event rate.