Therapeutic targets in subependymoma.

Subependymomas are usually treated with surgical resection; however, no standard, defined alternative medical therapy is recommended for patients who are not surgical candidates, owing to a paucity of molecular, immunological, and genetic characterization. To address this, an ex vivo functional analysis of the immune microenvironment in subependymoma was conducted, a subependymoma cytokine/chemokine microarray was constructed for the evaluation of operational immune and molecular pathways, and a subependymoma cell line was derived and used to test a variety of cytotoxic agents that target operational pathways identified in subependymoma. We found that immune effectors are detectable within the microenvironment of subependymoma; however, marked immune suppression is not observed. The subependymoma tissue microarrays demonstrated tumor expression of p53, MDM2, HIF-1α, topoisomerase II-ß, p-STAT3, and nucleolin, but not EGFRvIII, EphA2, IL-13RA2, CMV, CTLA-4, FoxP3, PD-1, PD-L1, EGFR, PDGF-α, PDGF-ß, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-ß, PTEN, IGFBP2, PI3K, MDM4, IDH1, mTOR, or Jak2. A topoisomerase inhibitor (WP744, IC50=0.83 µM) and a p-STAT3/HIF-1α inhibitor (WP1066, IC50=3.15 µM) demonstrated a growth inhibition of the subependymoma cell proliferation. Cumulatively, these data suggest that those agents that interfere with oncogenes operational in subependymoma may have clinical impact.

Identification of relevant prognostic histopathologic features in 69 intracranial ependymomas, excluding myxopapillary ependymomas and subependymomas.

BACKGROUND: The results of attempts to identify histopathologic parameters that contribute to the clinical outcome of patients with ependymomas have been controversial. This may be due to the relative rareness of ependymomas. Furthermore, in many investigations, myxopapillary ependymomas and subependymomas were included and may have confounded results, because those tumors should be considered clinicopathologic entities distinct from the other ependymomas. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the influence of the histologic subtype of ependymoma and of individual histologic features on the outcome of 69 patients with ependymomas was investigated. Myxopapillary ependymomas, subependymomas, and ependymomas with spinal localizations were excluded from the analysis. The ependymomas were subdivided into cellular, papillary, clear cell, and tanycytic subtypes. The study extended over a period of 30 years. RESULTS: No differences in clinical outcome between the four histologic subtypes of ependymomas were revealed. Neither tumor localization (either infratentorial or supratentorial), patient age, nor gender affected survival. The survival of patients who underwent complete tumor resection differed significantly from that of patients who underwent partial resection. In univariate analysis, the features of nuclear atypia, the mitotic index, and the MIB-1 labeling index (LI) significantly influenced survival. With regard to survival, the presence of microcysts, blood vessel density, and the feature of vascular hyalinization demonstrated a trend but did not reach significance. In multivariate analysis, only the mitotic index and the MIB-1 LI were identified as factors with independent prognostic significance (P = 0.027 and P = 0.023, respectively). Both proliferation indices were correlated strongly with each other. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the univariate analysis indicated that, for patients with intracranial ependymoma, nuclear atypia, the mitotic index, and the MIB-1 LI significantly influenced survival. In the multivariate analysis, the mitotic index and the MIB-1 LI were the only features that had independent prognostic significance. Because both showed strong correlations, only one of them should be included in a grading scheme for intracranial ependymomas.

Tuberin and hamartin expression is reduced in the majority of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis complex consistent with a two-hit model of pathogenesis.

Subependymal giant cell astrocytomas are distinctive brain tumors that are seen only in tuberous sclerosis complex. Although histologically benign, they cause both moribidity and occasional mortality owing to progressive growth in some patients. Tuberous sclerosis complex is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with a high sporadic case rate that is due to mutations in either of two genes, TSC1 and TSC2, encoding hamartin and tuberin, respectively. The pathogenesis of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis complex is uncertain. In this study, we examined the expression of tuberin and hamartin in subependymal giant cell astrocytomas from nine patients with tuberous sclerosis complex by immunohistochemistry with confocal microscopy. Loss of hamartin expression was seen in all subependymal giant cell astrocytomas, including five from patients with germline TSC2 mutations and two from patients with germline TSC1 mutations. The subependymal giant cell astrocytomas of six of nine patients had no expression of tuberin as well, whereas three patients retained some tuberin expression. Tuberin expression was seen in one patient with a TSC2 germline mutation and two patients whose mutational status was not determined. Overall, these data indicate a loss of both tuberin and hamartin expression in the subependymal giant cell astrocytomas of patients with both TSC1 and TSC2 mutations and are consistent with a two-hit disease pathogenesis model for the development of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas.