Spatiotemporal trends of the global burden of melanoma in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: Results from the 2019 global burden of disease study.

This study aimed to estimate the latest magnitudes and temporal trends of melanoma burden at the national, regional, and global levels. The data on melanoma incidence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2019 came from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Study. Estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated to depict the temporal trends and Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the influential factors of EAPC. From 1990 to 2019, the incident cases of melanoma increased by 170% to 289,950, death increased by 90% to 62,840, and DALYs increased by 67% to 1,707,800 globally. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of melanoma increased globally by an average of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.32], while the age-standardized rates of death and DALYs both declined with the EAPC of -0.27 (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.19) and -0.49 (95% CI: -0.57 to -0.41). In 2019, the highest burden of melanoma was observed in Australasia, followed by high-income North America and Europe regions, which all presented an incremental growth in ASIR. The positive association between the EAPC in ASIR and socio-demographic index (SDI) in 2019 (ρ = 0.600, P < 0.001) suggested that countries with higher SDI have experienced a more rapid increase in ASIR of melanoma. In conclusion, the burden of melanoma is increasing globally but differed greatly across the world. Notably, the high burden areas are facing a continuing increase in incidence, which implies more targeted strategies should be taken for reducing the increasing melanoma burden.

Assessment of Global Trends in the Diagnosis of Mesothelioma From 1990 to 2017.

Importance: It is difficult for policy makers and clinicians to formulate targeted management strategies for mesothelioma because data on current epidemiological patterns worldwide are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the mesothelioma burden across the world and describe its epidemiological distribution over time and by sociodemographic index (SDI) level, geographic location, sex, and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: Annual case data and age-standardized rates of incidence, death, and disability-adjusted life-years associated with mesothelioma among different age groups were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 database. The estimated annual percentage changes in age-standardized rates were calculated to evaluate temporal trends in incidence and mortality. The study population comprised individuals from 21 regions in 195 countries and territories who were diagnosed with mesothelioma between 1990 and 2017. Data were collected from May 23, 2019, to January 18, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were incident cases, deaths, and their age-standardized rates and estimated annual percentage changes. Secondary outcomes were disability-adjusted life-years and relative temporal trends. Results: Overall, 34 615 new cases (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 33 530-35 697 cases) of mesothelioma and 29 909 deaths (95% UI, 29 134-30 613 deaths) associated with mesothelioma were identified in 2017, and more than 70% of these cases and deaths were among male individuals. In 1990, the number of incident cases was 21 224 (95% UI, 17 503-25 450), and the number of deaths associated with mesothelioma was 17 406 (95% UI, 14 495-20 660). These numbers increased worldwide from 1990 to 2017, with more than 50% of cases recorded in regions with high SDI levels, whereas the age-standardized incidence rate (from 0.52 [95% UI, 0.43-0.62] in 1990 to 0.44 [95% UI, 0.42-0.45] in 2017) and the age-standardized death rate (from 0.44 [95% UI, 0.37-0.52] in 1990 to 0.38 [95% UI, 0.37-0.39] in 2017) decreased, with estimated annual percentage changes of -0.61 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.54) for age-standardized incidence rate and -0.44 (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.37) for age-standardized death rate. The proportion of incident cases among those 70 years or older continued to increase (from 36.49% in 1990 to 44.67% in 2017), but the proportion of patients younger than 50 years decreased (from 16.74% in 1990 to 13.75% in 2017) over time. In addition, mesothelioma incident cases and age-standardized incidence rates began to decrease after 20 years of a complete ban on asbestos use. For example, in Italy, a complete ban on asbestos went into effect in 1992; incident cases increased from 1409 individuals (95% UI, 1013-1733 individuals) in 1990, peaked in 2015 after 23 years of the asbestos ban, then decreased from 1820 individuals (95% UI, 1699-1981 individuals) in 2015 to 1746 individuals (95% UI, 1555-1955 individuals) in 2017. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that incident cases of mesothelioma and deaths associated with mesothelioma continuously increased worldwide, especially in resource-limited regions with low SDI levels. Based on these findings, global governments and medical institutions may consider formulating optimal policies and strategies for the targeted prevention and management of mesothelioma.

Global burden of psoriasis - comparison of regional and global epidemiology, 1990 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common disease that has not only cutaneous manifestations but also causes significant systemic illness and disability. Most epidemiological studies on the burden of psoriasis that are available in literature are regional, and thus a detailed description of the worldwide burden of psoriasis is warranted. METHODS: We analyzed the prevalence, incidence, disability adjusted life years (DALY), and years lived with disability (YLD) related to psoriasis for the period 1990 to 2017, from the Global Burden of Disease dataset (developed by the Institute of Health Metrics, University of Washington). We also searched the PubMed MEDLINE for quality of life and economic burden of psoriasis for a comprehensive evaluation of the burden of psoriasis. RESULTS: In 2017, the global age-standardized prevalence rate of psoriasis was 811 per 100,000 population, approximating to 0.84% of world population or about 64.6 million individuals. The incidence of new cases increased from 92 per 100,000 in 1990 to 99 in 2017. The highest rates were recorded in North America and Western Europe, while the lowest rates were found in Asia and Western Pacific regions. The age distribution shows a rising rate of incidence from the second decade, peaking at 55-60 years. Women are slightly more likely to be affected. CONCLUSIONS: The global incidence of psoriasis has been rising over the last three decades. The burden of the economic and psychosocial suffering caused by psoriasis calls for resource allocation and a multidisciplinary approach to address this common medical condition. KEY MESSAGE: The prevalence, incidence, and the burden of suffering caused by psoriasis have been rising over the past 17 years, despite efforts at improving diagnosis and treatment.

Global Disability Burdens of Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Complications in 1990 and 2016.

OBJECTIVE: No study has reported global disability burden estimates for individual diabetes-related lower-extremity complications (DRLECs). The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study presents a robust opportunity to address this gap. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: GBD 2016 data, including prevalence and years lived with disability (YLDs), for the DRLECs of diabetic neuropathy, foot ulcer, and amputation with and without prosthesis were used. The GBD estimated prevalence using data from systematic reviews and DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression tool. YLDs were estimated as the product of prevalence estimates and disability weights for each DRLEC. We reported global and sex-, age-, region-, and country-specific estimates for each DRLEC for 1990 and 2016. RESULTS: In 2016, an estimated 131 million people (1.8% of the global population) had DRLECs. An estimated 16.8 million YLDs (2.1% global YLDs) were caused by DRLECs, including 12.9 million (95% uncertainty interval 8.30-18.8) from neuropathy only, 2.5 million (1.7-3.6) from foot ulcers, 1.1 million (0.7-1.4) from amputation without prosthesis, and 0.4 million (0.3-0.5) from amputation with prosthesis. Age-standardized YLD rates of all DRLECs increased by between 14.6% and 31.0% from 1990 estimates. Male-to-female YLD ratios ranged from 0.96 for neuropathy only to 1.93 for foot ulcers. The 50- to 69-year-old age-group accounted for 47.8% of all YLDs from DRLECs. CONCLUSIONS: These first-ever global estimates suggest that DRLECs are a large and growing contributor to the disability burden worldwide and disproportionately affect males and middle- to older-aged populations. These findings should facilitate policy makers worldwide to target strategies at populations disproportionately affected by DRLECs.

Medidas de salud pública durante la pandemia de gripe en el periodo 1918-1920 en España / Public health measures during the flu pandemic in the period 1918-1920 in Spain

OBJETIVO: La epidemia de gripe de 1918 fue un evento de gran resonancia sociosanitaria, que provocó una elevada morbilidad y mortalidad en la población. La rapidez en el desarrollo de los síntomas, la extensión a grupos muy amplios de la población y el desconocimiento del agente causal, fueron los factores que, sumados, confirieron a la gripe un carácter de importante problema de salud pública. El objetivo de este estudio fue revisar, a través de la prensa escrita española, las medidas de salud pública adoptadas como consecuencia de la epidemia de gripe de 1918. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una selección de prensa española a través de la Hemeroteca Digital de la Biblioteca Nacional (HDBN) de España, desde el 1 de enero de 1918 al 31 de diciembre de 1920; y se buscó el concepto "gripe", seleccionando aquellas unidades de análisis que hacían referencia a las medidas de salud pública adoptadas durante la epidemia de gripe de 1918. RESULTADOS: Los periódicos analizados informaron de las medidas de salud pública adoptadas por las autoridades sanitarias de los diferentes países con el fin de reducir la propagación de la epidemia, como el cierre de las escuelas y el aplazamiento de la apertura del curso académico, la desinfección de locales, cuarentenas, aislamiento, suspensión de fiestas populares, desinfección e higiene, control de fronteras, suspensión de comunicaciones por tren, así como la creación y uso de diferentes vacunas y sueros para inmunizar a la población. CONCLUSIONES: La deficiente gestión de la epidemia pudo ser una de las causas del gran impacto de la gripe en la primera quincena del mes de octubre de 1918, pues las decisiones de la administración para impulsar medidas de salud pública fueron adoptadas con cierto retraso

BACKGROUND: The 1918 influenza epidemic was an event of great social and health resonance, which caused high morbidity and mortality in the population. The rapidity in the development of symptoms, the extension to very large groups of the population and the lack of knowledge of the causative agent, were the factors that, added together, made the flu a major public health problem. The objective of this study was to review, through the Spanish written press, of the public health measures adopted as a consequence of the influenza epidemic of 1918. METHODS: A selection of the Spanish press was carried out through the Digital Newspaper Library of the National Library (HDBN) of Spain, from January 1, 1918 to December 31, 1920; and the concept "flu" was searched, selecting those units of analysis that made reference to the public health measures adopted during the flu epidemic of 1918. RESULTS: The newspapers analyzed reported the public health measures adopted by the health authorities of the different countries in order to reduce the spread of the epidemic, such as the closure of schools and the postponement of the opening of the academic year, disinfection of premises, quarantines, isolation, suspension, popular celebrations, disinfection and hygiene, border control, suspension of communications by train, as well as the creation and use of different vaccines and serums to immunize the population. CONCLUSIONS: The poor management of the epidemic could be one of the causes of the great impact of influenza in the first half of October 1918, as the decisions of the administration to promote public health measures were adopted with some delay

History and Global Burden of Viral Hepatitis.

Between 1963 and 1989, 5 hepatotropic viruses have been discovered that are the major causes of viral hepatitides worldwide: hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis delta virus and hepatitis E virus. Their epidemiology and pathogenesis have been studied in great detail. Furthermore, the structure and genetic organization of their DNA or RNA genome including the viral life cycle have been elucidated and have been successfully translated into important clinical applications, such as the specific diagnosis, therapy and prevention of the associated liver diseases, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The prevalence of acute and chronic viral hepatitis A-E shows distinct geographic differences. The global burden of disease (prevalence, incidence, death, disability-adjusted life years) has been analyzed in seminal studies that show that the worldwide prevalence of hepatitis A-E has significantly decreased between 1990 and 2013. During the same time, the incidence of HBV-related liver cirrhosis and HCC, respectively, also decreased or increased slightly, the incidence of the HCV-related liver cirrhosis remained stable and the incidence of HCV-related HCC showed a major increase. During the coming years, we expect to improve our ability to prevent and effectively treat viral hepatitis A-E, resulting in the control of these global infections and the elimination of their associated morbidities and mortalities.