Ameliorative effect of lixisenatide on diabetic cardiovascular damage and its enhancement via ticagrelor co-administration in rats: possible role of eNOS and NrF2 /HO-1 signaling.

In this study, we hypothesized that lixisenatide (LIX) and ticagrelor (TIC) could have a protective effect against type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-induced vascular damage. Furthermore, we explored the possible additional protective effect of co-administering LIX and TIC in the treatment regimen. Methods: 50 male rats were divided into five groups, each comprising 10 rats: C (control), D (T2DM rats), D + LIX (T2DM rats treated with LIX for 4 weeks), D + TIC (T2DM rats treated with TIC for 4 weeks), and D + LIX + TIC (T2DM rats treated with LIX + TIC for 4 weeks). Results: The D group showed an increase in body weight, blood glucose, hemostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), aorta reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κ B), along with a reduction in serum insulin, aorta superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione reduced (GSH), nuclear factor erythroid-2 (NrF2), hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Deterioration in the aorta histopathological condition, coupled with a noticeable impairment in vascular reactivity compared to the C group, was observed. A single administration of LIX showed a reduction in body weight, blood glucose, HOMA-IR, aorta ROS, and NF-κ B, accompanied by an increase in serum insulin, aorta SOD, GSH, NrF2, HO-1, and eNOS. Amelioration in the aorta histopathological condition and improved vascular reactivity compared to the D group were reported. Similarly, a single administration of TIC showed a reduction in aorta ROS and NF-κ B, along with an increase in aorta SOD, GSH, NrF2, HO-1, and eNOS. A slight amelioration was detected in the aorta histopathological condition, with improved vascular reactivity compared to the D group. The combined administration of LIX and TIC showed a reduction in aorta ROS and NF-κ B, along with an increase in aorta GSH, SOD, HO-1, and eNOS. This was combined with evident amelioration in the aorta histopathological condition and noticeable improvement in vascular reactivity compared to the single treatment with either LIX or TIC group. Conclusion: The present study introduces clear evidence that the administration of LIX and TIC can improve metabolic and vascular complications of T2DM through modulating eNOS and NrF2 /HO-1 signaling. The combined administration of LIX and TIC produced more significant effects than a single treatment.

Tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus injectable semaglutide 0.5 mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg with subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg as second-line treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, after metformin monotherapy, using adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (aITCs). METHODS: The aITCs were performed using the Bucher method to compare the relative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 0.5 mg via a common comparator (subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg) based on trial results from SURPASS-2 (NCT03987919) and SUSTAIN7 (NCT02648204). RESULTS: All tirzepatide doses showed statistically significantly greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin, body weight and body mass index from baseline to week 40, with a comparable adverse event (AE) profile and no statistically significant differences in the odds of gastrointestinal AEs versus semaglutide 0.5 mg. Furthermore, all tirzepatide doses showed greater odds of patients achieving HbA1c targets of ≤ 6.5 % (≤48 mmol/mol) and < 7.0 % (<53 mmol/mol) and weight loss targets of ≥ 5 % and ≥ 10 %, versus semaglutide 0.5 mg. CONCLUSIONS: In these aITCs, glycated haemoglobin and weight reductions were significantly greater for all tirzepatide doses versus semaglutide 0.5 mg with a comparable AE profile. These findings provide comparative effectiveness insights in the absence of a head-to-head clinical trial.

Characterization of tirzepatide-treated patients achieving different glycemic control levels in SURPASS-AP-Combo.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to characterize subgroups of Asia-Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes who achieved different glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets on tirzepatide treatment. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the SURPASS AP-Combo study. Baseline characteristics, changes in metabolic markers, and safety were compared between tirzepatide-treated patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) and those achieving ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) at week 40. Among patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol), further comparisons were conducted among subgroups achieving HbA1c <5.7% (<39 mmol/mol), 5.7% to 6.5% (39 to 48 mmol/mol), and >6.5% to <7.0% (>48 to <53 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-eight patients on tirzepatide treatment without rescue medication were included (56.9% male; mean age: 53.1 years; mean baseline HbA1c: 8.7% [71.6 mmol/mol]). Patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) versus ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol) were slightly younger with a shorter disease duration and lower HbA1c at baseline, and they had greater improvements in HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist-height ratio, diastolic blood pressure, lipids, and self-monitored blood glucose at week 40. Patients achieving HbA1c <5.7% (<39 mmol/mol) versus those achieving 5.7% to 6.5% (39 to 48 mmol/mol) and those achieving >6.5% to <7.0% (>48 to <53 mmol/mol) were much younger, had much lower HbA1c, and had further improvements in metabolic markers. Tirzepatide treatment was well tolerated irrespective of the HbA1c level achieved, with a low incidence of hypoglycemic events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help to inform clinical decisions in Asia-Pacific patients with type 2 diabetes.

Lixisenatide in early parkinson's disease: efficacy, safety, and future directions: a correspondence.

Parkinson's disease (PD) presents as a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, resulting from dopaminergic neuron degeneration. Current treatment strategies primarily aim to alleviate symptoms through pharmacotherapy and supportive therapies. However, emerging research explores novel therapeutic avenues, including the repurposing of drugs like lixisenatide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist initially developed for type 2 diabetes. This correspondence summarizes a phase 2 clinical trial investigating lixisenatide's efficacy in early PD, demonstrating a potential for mitigating motor disability progression. Findings reveal a marginal improvement or stabilization in motor function among lixisenatide-treated individuals compared to placebo, emphasizing its therapeutic promise. Nonetheless, the emergence of gastrointestinal adverse events underscores the need for careful monitoring and management. Further extensive trials are warranted to delineate lixisenatide's efficacy and safety profile, fostering collaborative efforts towards precision treatments in PD.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide in adults with type 2 diabetes: An international, multicentre, 12-month, prospective observational study.

AIM: To assess the impact of insulin glargine (100 U/mL) and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) fixed-ratio combination therapy on the overall management of glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), previously inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs ± basal insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 12-month, international, multicentre, prospective, observational study included patients (age ≥ 18 years) with T2D who had initiated iGlarLixi within 1 month prior to study inclusion. Data were collected at study inclusion, month 3, month 6 and month 12 from patient diaries, self-measured plasma glucose, and questionnaires. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to month 6. RESULTS: Of the 737 eligible participants (mean age: 57.8 [standard deviation: 11.2] years; male: 49%), 685 had baseline and post-baseline HbA1c data available. The least squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline to month 6 was -1.4% (standard error [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.05 [-1.5, -1.3]). The absolute change from baseline at month 12 was -1.7% ± 1.9% (95% CI: -1.9, -1.5). There were 72 hypoglycaemia events reported during the study period, with a very low incidence of severe hypoglycaemia (two participants [rate: 0.003 events per patient-year]). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world observational study shows that initiation of iGlarLixi in people with T2D inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs ± basal insulin or GLP-1 RAs improves glycaemic control with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia.

Targeting the GLP-2 receptor in the management of obesity.

Recent advancements in understanding glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) biology and pharmacology have sparked interest in targeting the GLP-2 receptor (GLP-2R) in the treatment of obesity. GLP-2 is a proglucagon-derived 33-amino acid peptide co-secreted from enteroendocrine L cells along with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and has a range of actions via the GLP-2R, which is particularly expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, adipose tissue, and the central nervous system (CNS). In humans, GLP-2 evidently induces intestinotrophic effects (i.e., induction of intestinal mucosal proliferation and improved gut barrier function) and promotes mesenteric blood flow. However, GLP-2 does not seem to have appetite or food intake-reducing effects in humans, but its gut barrier-promoting effect may be of interest in the context of obesity. Obesity is associated with reduced gut barrier function, increasing the translocation of proinflammatory gut content to the circulation. This phenomenon constitutes a strong driver of obesity-associated systemic low-grade inflammation, which in turn plays a major role in the development of most obesity-associated complications. Thus, the intestinotrophic and gut barrier-improving effect of GLP-2, which in obese rodent models shows strong anti-inflammatory potential, may, in combination with food intake-reducing strategies, e.g., GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonism, be able to rectify core pathophysiological mechanism of obesity. Here, we provide an overview of GLP-2 physiology in the context of obesity pathophysiology and review the pharmacological potential of GLP-2R activation in the management of obesity and related comorbidities.

Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of s.c. administered tirzepatide vs s.c. administered semaglutide for adults of both sexes with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Cochrane up to 11 November 2023 for RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks assessing s.c. tirzepatide at maintenance doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg once weekly, or s.c. semaglutide at maintenance doses of 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg once weekly, in adults with type 2 diabetes, regardless of background glucose-lowering treatment. Eligible trials compared any of the specified doses of tirzepatide and semaglutide against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and body weight from baseline. Secondary outcomes were achievement of HbA1c target of ≤48 mmol/mol (≤6.5%) or <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%), body weight loss of at least 10%, and safety outcomes including gastrointestinal adverse events and severe hypoglycaemia. We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias, conducted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses and evaluated confidence in effect estimates utilising the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. RESULTS: A total of 28 trials with 23,622 participants (44.2% female) were included. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide 15 mg was the most efficacious treatment in reducing HbA1c (mean difference -21.61 mmol/mol [-1.96%]) followed by tirzepatide 10 mg (-20.19 mmol/mol [-1.84%]), semaglutide 2.0 mg (-17.74 mmol/mol [-1.59%]), tirzepatide 5 mg (-17.60 mmol/mol [-1.60%]), semaglutide 1.0 mg (-15.25 mmol/mol [-1.39%]) and semaglutide 0.5 mg (-12.00 mmol/mol [-1.09%]). In between-drug comparisons, all tirzepatide doses were comparable with semaglutide 2.0 mg and superior to semaglutide 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg. Compared with placebo, tirzepatide was more efficacious than semaglutide for reducing body weight, with reductions ranging from 9.57 kg (tirzepatide 15 mg) to 5.27 kg (tirzepatide 5 mg). Semaglutide had a less pronounced effect, with reductions ranging from 4.97 kg (semaglutide 2.0 mg) to 2.52 kg (semaglutide 0.5 mg). In between-drug comparisons, tirzepatide 15 mg, 10 mg and 5 mg demonstrated greater efficacy than semaglutide 2.0 mg, 1.0 mg and 0.5 mg, respectively. Both drugs increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo, while neither tirzepatide nor semaglutide increased the risk of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data show that s.c. tirzepatide had a more pronounced effect on HbA1c and weight reduction compared with s.c. semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes. Both drugs, particularly higher doses of tirzepatide, increased gastrointestinal adverse events. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022382594.

Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes and Tirzepatide Treatment: A Post Hoc Analysis From the SURPASS Clinical Trial Program.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated baseline characteristics of participants with early-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the SURPASS program and tirzepatide's effects on glycemic control, body weight (BW), and cardiometabolic markers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis compared baseline characteristics and changes in mean HbA1c, BW, waist circumference (WC), lipids, and blood pressure (BP) in 3,792 participants with early-onset versus later-onset T2D at week 40 (A Study of Tirzepatide [LY3298176] in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Not Controlled With Diet and Exercise Alone [SURPASS-1] and A Study of Tirzepatide [LY3298176] Versus Semaglutide Once Weekly as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes [SURPASS-2]) or week 52 (A Study of Tirzepatide [LY3298176] Versus Insulin Degludec in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes [SURPASS-3]). Analyses were performed by study on data from participants while on assigned treatment without rescue medication in case of persistent hyperglycemia. RESULTS: At baseline in SURPASS-2, participants with early-onset versus later-onset T2D were younger with longer diabetes duration (9 vs. 7 years, P < 0.001) higher glycemic levels (8.5% vs. 8.2%, P < 0.001), higher BW (97 vs. 93 kg, P < 0.001) and BMI (35 vs. 34 kg/m2, P < 0.001), and a similarly abnormal lipid profile (e.g., triglycerides 167 vs. 156 mg/dL). At week 40, similar improvements in HbA1c (-2.6% vs. -2.4%), BW (-14 vs. -13 kg), WC (-10 vs. -10 cm), triglycerides (-26% vs. -24%), HDL (7% vs. 7%), and systolic BP (-6 vs. -7 mmHg) were observed in both subgroups with tirzepatide. CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age, participants with early-onset T2D from the SURPASS program had higher glycemic levels and worse overall metabolic health at baseline versus those with later-onset T2D. In this post hoc analysis, similar improvements in HbA1c, BW, and cardiometabolic markers were observed with tirzepatide, irrespective of age at T2D diagnosis. Future studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes of tirzepatide in early-onset T2D.

The preclinical discovery and clinical evaluation of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Despite numerous antidiabetic medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, a substantial percentage of patients fail to achieve optimal glycemic control. Furthermore, the escalating obesity pandemic underscores the urgent need for effective relevant pharmacotherapies. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, offers a promising therapeutic option. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the discovery and clinical development of tirzepatide. Based on data from pivotal in vivo and in vitro studies, the authors present the pharmacodynamic profile of tirzepatide. Furthermore, they summarize data from the clinical trial programs that assessed the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes or obesity in a broad spectrum of patients, and discuss its therapeutic potential. EXPERT OPINION: Tirzepatide effectively reduces glucose levels and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with a generally safe profile. Based on data from phase 3 clinical trials, several agencies have approved its use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Clinicians should be aware of possible adverse events, mainly mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects. Overall, tirzepatide represents a promising treatment option for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 class drugs show clear protective effects in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: A revolution in the making?

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex syndrome for which there is no disease-modifying treatment on the market. However, a group of drugs from the Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) class have shown impressive improvements in clinical phase II trials. Exendin-4 (Bydureon), Liraglutide (Victoza, Saxenda) and Lixisenatide (Adlyxin), drugs that are on the market as treatments for diabetes, have shown clear effects in improving motor activity in patients with PD in phase II clinical trials. In addition, Liraglutide has shown improvement in cognition and brain shrinkage in a phase II trial in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Two phase III trials testing the GLP-1 drug semaglutide (Wegovy, Ozempic, Rybelsus) are ongoing. This perspective article will summarize the clinical results obtained so far in this novel research area. We are at a crossroads where GLP-1 class drugs are emerging as a new treatment strategy for PD and for AD. Newer drugs that have been designed to enter the brain easier are being developed already show improved effects in preclinical studies compared with the older GLP-1 class drugs that had been developed to treat diabetes. The future looks bright for new treatments for AD and PD.

Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Overweight and Obese Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Introduction and Objective: Most patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States are overweight (OW) or obese (OB), contributing to insulin resistance and suboptimal glucose control. The primary Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for T1D is insulin, which may adversely affect weight. Tirzepatide is approved for managing type 2 diabetes, improves glucose control, facilitates weight loss, and improves cardiovascular disease outcomes. We assessed the use of tirzepatide in OW/OB subjects with T1D. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center real-world study in 62 OW/OB adult patients with T1D who were prescribed tirzepatide (treated group) and followed for 1 year. At least 3 months of use of tirzepatide was one of the inclusion criteria. Based on the inclusion criteria, this study represents 62 patients out of 184 prescribed tirzepatide. The control group included 37 OW/OB patients with T1D (computer frequency matched by age, duration of diabetes, gender, body mass index (BMI), and glucose control) who were not using any other weight-loss medications during the same period. The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) dose of weekly tirzepatide at 3 months was 5.6 ± 1.9 mg that increased to 9.7 ± 3.3 mg at 1 year. Results: The gender, mean baseline age, duration of diabetes, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar in the two groups, whereas BMI and weight were higher in the treated group. There were significantly larger declines in BMI and weight in the treated group than in controls across all time points among those in whom data were available. HbA1c decreased in the treated group as early as 3 months and was sustained through a 1-year follow-up (-0.67% at 1 year). As expected, insulin dose decreased at 3 months and throughout the study period. There were no reported hospitalizations from severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. The mean glucose, time-in-range, time-above-range, SD, and coefficient of variation (continuous glucose monitoring metrics) significantly improved in the treated group. Conclusions: In this pilot (off label) study, we conclude that tirzepatide facilitated an average 18.5% weight loss (>46 pounds) and improved glucose control in OW/OB patients with T1D at 1 year. For safe use of tirzepatide in patients with T1D, we strongly recommend a large prospective randomized control trial in OW/OB patients with T1D.

Effect of tirzepatide on body fat distribution pattern in people with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To describe the overall fat distribution patterns independent of body mass index (BMI) in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the SURPASS-3 MRI substudy by comparison with sex- and BMI-matched virtual control groups (VCGs) derived from the UK Biobank imaging study at baseline and Week 52. METHODS: For each study participant at baseline and Week 52 (N = 296), a VCG of ≥150 participants with the same sex and similar BMI was identified from the UK Biobank imaging study (N = 40 172). Average visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (aSAT) and liver fat (LF) levels and the observed standard deviations (SDs; standardized normal z-scores: z-VAT, z-aSAT and z-LF) were calculated based on the matched VCGs. Differences in z-scores between baseline and Week 52 were calculated to describe potential shifts in fat distribution pattern independent of weight change. RESULTS: Baseline fat distribution patterns were similar across pooled tirzepatide (5, 10 and 15 mg) and insulin degludec (IDeg) arms. Compared with matched VCGs, SURPASS-3 participants had higher baseline VAT (mean [SD] z-VAT +0.42 [1.23]; p < 0.001) and LF (z-LF +1.24 [0.92]; p < 0.001) but similar aSAT (z-aSAT -0.13 [1.11]; p = 0.083). Tirzepatide-treated participants had significant decreases in z-VAT (-0.18 [0.58]; p < 0.001) and z-LF (-0.54 [0.84]; p < 0.001) but increased z-aSAT (+0.11 [0.50]; p = 0.012). Participants treated with IDeg had a significant change in z-LF only (-0.46 [0.90]; p = 0.001), while no significant changes were observed for z-VAT (+0.13 [0.52]; p = 0.096) and z-aSAT (+0.09 [0.61]; p = 0.303). CONCLUSION: In this exploratory analysis, treatment with tirzepatide in people with T2D resulted in a significant reduction of z-VAT and z-LF, while z-aSAT was increased from an initially negative value, suggesting a possible treatment-related shift towards a more balanced fat distribution pattern with prominent VAT and LF loss.

Potent incretin-based therapy for obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of semaglutide and tirzepatide on body weight and waist circumference, and safety.

Potent incretin-based therapy shows promise for the treatment of obesity along with reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and obesity. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the incretin-based obesity treatments, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg, in people with obesity without diabetes. Of the 744 records identified, seven randomized controlled trials (n = 5140) were included. Five studies (n = 3288) investigated semaglutide and two studies (n = 1852) investigated tirzepatide. The treatment effect, shown as placebo-subtracted difference, on body weight was -15.0% (95% CI, -17.8 to -12.2) with -12.9% (95% CI, -14.7 to -11.1) for semaglutide and -19.2% (95% CI, -22.2 to -16.2) for tirzepatide. The treatment effect on waist circumference was -11.4 cm (95% CI, -13.7 to -9.2) with -9.7 cm (95% CI, -10.8 to -8.5) for semaglutide and -14.6 cm (95% CI, -15.8 to -13.4) for tirzepatide. The adverse events related to semaglutide and tirzepatide were primarily of mild-to-moderate severity and mostly gastrointestinal, which was more frequent during the dose-titration period and leveled off during the treatment period. This emphasizes that once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide 10 or 15 mg induce large reductions in body weight and waist circumference and are generally well-tolerated.

The effect of subcutaneous Lixisenatide on weight loss in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The impacts of subcutaneous Lixisenatide on body weight in patients with type 2 DM, remain inadequately understood; consequently, this systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the influence of subcutaneous Lixisenatide administration on BW and BMI values in individuals with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across four databases, spanning from their inception to February 2023. We computed effect sizes employing the random-effects model and reported results in terms of weighted mean differences (WMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: 23 articles with 26 RCT arms were included in the meta-analysis. The combined findings from a random-effects model demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight (WMD: -0.97 kg, 95 % CI: -1.10, -0.83, p < 0.001) and BMI (WMD: -0.48 kg/m2, 95 % CI: -0.67, -0.29, P < 0.001) after subcutaneous administration of Lixisenatide. Furthermore, a more pronounced reduction in body weight was discovered in RCTs lasting less than 24 weeks (WMD: -1.56 kg, 95 % CI: -2.91, -0.20, p < 0.001), employing a daily dosage of subcutaneous Lixisenatide lower than 19 Âµg per day (WMD: -1.94 kg, 95 % CI: -2.54, -1.34, p < 0.001) and with a mean participant age of 60 years or more (WMD: -1.86 kg, 95 % CI: -3.16, -0.57, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lixisenatide was found to significantly decrease BW and BMI in patients with type 2 DM and could be considered as a therapeutic option for those suffering from weight gain caused by other anti-diabetic agents. However, while prescribing Lixisenatide, careful consideration of patient-specific factors is recommended.

White analytical insight for sensitive fluorescent determination of semaglutide and tirzepatide in pharmaceuticals and biological matrices.

The present study is focused on the sensitive determination of newly FDA-approved glucagon-like-peptide agonists semaglutide (SEM) and tirzepatide (TIR). Direct, selective and label-free spectrofluorometric method was proposed and validated (according to ICH guidelines) for determination SEM and TIR in their pure form, newly approved pharmaceuticals and spiked human plasma. The developed method was based on measuring the native fluorescence of SEM and TIR in ethanol at 294.8 and 303 nm after being excited at 216 and 225 nm for SEM and TIR in order. The method sensibility allowed the quantification of both drugs in nano-scale up to 10 ng/mL. Several experimental variables including solvent type, surfactant, and pH were optimized after several attempts to get the best sensitivity for both drugs. The mean recovery percentage of SEM was compared and found in agreement with the reported method using student's t-test and the variance ratio F-test. Additionally, the greenness and whiteness profiles for this approach were evaluated using the GAPI, AGREE, and RGB algorithm; the positive results supported its use as great candidates for successful implementation in quality control labs and the pharmaceutical analysis companies.

Evidence that tirzepatide protects against diabetes-related cardiac damages.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective antidiabetic drugs with potential cardiovascular benefits. Despite their well-established role in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), their impact on heart failure (HF) remains unclear. Therefore, our study examined the cardioprotective effects of tirzepatide (TZT), a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. METHODS: A three-steps approach was designed: (i) Meta-analysis investigation with the primary objective of assessing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurrence from major randomized clinical trials.; (ii) TZT effects on a human cardiac AC16 cell line exposed to normal (5 mM) and high (33 mM) glucose concentrations for 7 days. The gene expression and protein levels of primary markers related to cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy, and calcium modulation were evaluated. (iii) In silico data from bioinformatic analyses for generating an interaction map that delineates the potential mechanism of action of TZT. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed a reduced risk for MACE events by TZT therapy (HR was 0.59 (95% CI 0.40-0.79, Heterogeneity: r2 = 0.01, I2 = 23.45%, H2 = 1.31). In the human AC16 cardiac cell line treatment with 100 nM TZT contrasted high glucose (HG) levels increase in the expression of markers associated with fibrosis, hypertrophy, and cell death (p < 0.05 for all investigated markers). Bioinformatics analysis confirmed the interaction between the analyzed markers and the associated pathways found in AC16 cells by which TZT affects apoptosis, fibrosis, and contractility, thus reducing the risk of heart failure. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that TZT has beneficial effects on cardiac cells by positively modulating cardiomyocyte death, fibrosis, and hypertrophy in the presence of high glucose concentrations. This suggests that TZT may reduce the risk of diabetes-related cardiac damage, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic option for heart failure management clinical trials. Our study strongly supports the rationale behind the clinical trials currently underway, the results of which will be further investigated to gain insights into the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of TZT.

Semaglutide and Tirzepatide for the Management of Weight Recurrence After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for obesity and improvement of obesity-associated comorbidities. However, a proportion of these patients may suffer from weight recurrence and recurrence of obesity-associated comorbidities. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent SG between January 2008 and August 2022 and sought treatment for weight recurrence with semaglutide or tirzepetide from January 2022 onwards. RESULT: A total of 115 patients were included, of which 70 had SG and treated for weight recurrence with semaglutide and 45 had SG and treated with tirzepatide. The mean age of patients was 38.8 (10.4) and 80.9% of patients were female. The mean pre-treatment weight and BMI was 94.0 (23.8) kg and 35.1 (6.0) kg/m2. Following treatment with semaglutide and tirzepatide, the mean post-treatment weight at 6 months was 81.0 (19.0) kg from 90.1 (19.6) kg and 87.6 (28.3) kg from 100.2 (28.5) kg respectively, corresponding to a clinically significant mean weight loss from baseline to 6 months of 10.3 (5.9)% (p < 0.05) and 15.5 (6.3)% (p < 0.05). Weight loss in tirzepatide patients was significantly greater than the semaglutide patients at 6 months (p < 0.02). There were no reported severe adverse events to the treatment. CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes show that semaglutide and tirzepatide can be an effective treatment for managing weight recurrence after SG. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the durability, as weight regain after discontinuation of the medication is highly likely, and the high cost of these medications can limit their use.

Effects of Tirzepatide Versus Basal Insulins in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Different Baseline Glycemic Patterns: Post Hoc Analyses of the SURPASS-3 and SURPASS-4 Trials.

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis assessed change from baseline to week 52 in glycemic parameters for tirzepatide (5, 10, 15 mg) versus insulin degludec (SURPASS-3 trial) and glargine (SURPASS-4 trial) in people with type 2 diabetes and different baseline glycemic patterns, based on fasting serum glucose (FSG) and postprandial glucose (PPG) values. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participant subgroups with low FSG/low PPG, low FSG/high PPG, high FSG/low PPG, and high FSG/high PPG were defined according to the median values of these measures. RESULTS: All tirzepatide doses and basal insulins were associated with decreased HbA1c, FSG, and PPG values from baseline to week 52 in all subgroups (P < 0.05). Within each subgroup, HbA1c and PPG decreases were greater with tirzepatide than insulin (P < 0.05). FSG decreases were generally similar. There were no differential treatment effects by FSG/PPG subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide was associated with superior glycemic control compared with insulin, irrespective of baseline glycemic pattern.

Use of Dulaglutide, Semaglutide, and Tirzepatide in Diabetes and Weight Management.

PURPOSE: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are effective therapies in lowering glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), providing cardioprotective benefits, and lowering weight. The use of GLP1-RA solely for weight-loss has become commonplace in many practices, which in turn has made it difficult in some areas for those with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to obtain these much-needed medications. METHODS: Using recent published literature, along with clinical experience, it has become apparent that many GLP1-RAs have become difficult to obtain for patients with diabetes. FINDINGS: Many clinicians started to prescribe the brand Ozempic® (semaglutide*) and dulaglutide for weight loss despite neither of them being Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for this indication. Ozempic, having outperformed dulaglutide in in both HbA1c reduction and weight loss, along with FDA approval of semaglutide for weight loss, has quickly become widely used off-label for weight loss. This off-label use may have increased, despite the approval of semaglutide,† because many insurances will not cover semaglutide solely for weight management. Most recently, Eli Lilly was able to develop tirzepatide,‡ which was FDA approved in May of 2022, and they are seeking fast-track FDA approval for weight loss and are projected to gain this approval within 2023. IMPLICATIONS: Insurance coverage for weight management remains sparse, and obtaining these therapies for diabetes has now become more burdensome, with insurance companies requiring a prior authorization proving FDA-approved diagnosis of T2DM. Hopefully, should more GLP1-Ras receive approval for weight loss, along with an increase in insurance coverage, the burden on patients with diabetes will be lessened as they are able to quickly obtain this highly effective therapy.