Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 94
Filter
1.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 37(4): 301-304, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702875

ABSTRACT

Health leaders are faced with a lack of public trust in healthcare governance. This waning trust relationship was further solidified through the pandemic. Improving the relationship between health organizations and the community/citizens/patient partners is a moral imperative of which ethical governance is a significant factor. This article will structure the ethical analysis of patient partners in governance through reviewing who we are, how we function, and what we do on governance boards. Taking an ethical approach will enable the promise of the value and impact of the patient partner to be actualized. Ethical governance that recognizes the significant contributions and value of engaged patient partners can be achieved and may be one of the significant levers required to transform healthcare.


Subject(s)
Patient Participation , Humans , Trust , Governing Board/ethics , Governing Board/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration
2.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(2): 353-359, 2021 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856323

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our goal in this study was to determine female representation on editorial boards of high-ranking emergency medicine (EM) journals. In addition, we examined factors associated with gender disparity, including board members' academic rank, departmental leadership position, h-index, total publications, total citations, and total publishing years. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined EM editorial boards with an impact factor of 1 or greater according to the Clarivate Journal Citations Report for a total of 16 journals. All board members with a doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathic medicine degree, or international equivalent were included, resulting in 781 included board members. We analyzed board members' gender, academic rank, departmental leadership position, h-index, total publications, total citations, and total publishing years. RESULTS: Gender disparity was clearly notable, with men holding 87.3% (682/781) of physician editorial board positions and women holding 12.7% (99/781) of positions. Only 6.6% (1/15) of included editorial board chiefs were women. Male editorial board members possessed higher h-indices, total citations, and more publishing years than their female counterparts. Male board members held a greater number of departmental leadership positions, as well as higher academic ranks. CONCLUSION: Significant gender disparity exists on EM editorial boards. Substantial inequalities between men and women board members exist in both the academic and departmental realms. Addressing these inequalities will likely be an integral part of achieving gender parity on editorial boards.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Governing Board , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Publishing , Academic Success , Editorial Policies , Female , Gender Equity , Governing Board/ethics , Governing Board/organization & administration , Governing Board/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Journal Impact Factor , Leadership , Male , Publishing/ethics , Publishing/organization & administration , Publishing/standards , Retrospective Studies
3.
Public Health Genomics ; 23(3-4): 77-89, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32396907

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts. OBJECTIVE: We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank. METHODS: We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS: The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research. CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks , Communication , Governing Board , Informed Consent , Access to Information , Attitude , Biological Specimen Banks/ethics , Biological Specimen Banks/trends , Ethics, Research , Governing Board/ethics , Governing Board/organization & administration , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/standards , Patient Rights
4.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(5): 717-725, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30887656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2018, a so-called crisis developed in the international network of systematic reviewers known as Cochrane. It was widely depicted in terms of two competing narratives-"bad behaviour" by one member of Cochrane's Governing Board and scientific and moral decline within Cochrane. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to distil insights on the structural issues underpinning the crisis, without taking a definitive position on the accuracy of either narrative. APPROACH AND DATASET: In this paper, we draw on (among other theories) Becker's notion of moral entrepreneurship and Foucault's conceptualisation of power to analyse the claims and counterclaims made by different parties. Our dataset consisted of publicly available materials (blogs, journal articles, newspaper articles) to end 2018, notably those relating to the expulsion of one Governing Board member. MAIN FINDINGS: Both narratives include strong moral claims about the science of systematic review and the governance of scientific organizations. The expelled individual and his supporters defined good systematic reviews in terms of a particular kind of methodological rigour and elimination of bias, and good governance largely in terms of measures to achieve independence from industry influence. Most of Cochrane's Governing Board and their sympathizers evaluated systematic reviews according to a broader range of criteria, incorporating factors such as attention to relationships among reviewers and reflexivity and dialogue around scientific and other judgements. They viewed governance partly in terms of accountability to an external advisory group. Power-knowledge alignments in Cochrane have emerged from, and contributed to, a particular system of meaning which is now undergoing evolution and challenge. CONCLUSION: Polarizing Cochrane's "crisis" into two narratives, only one of which is true, is less fruitful than viewing it in terms of a duality consisting of tensions between the two positions, each of which has some validity. Having framed the conflict as primarily philosophical and political rather than methodological and procedural, we suggest how Cochrane and its supporters and critics might harness their tensions productively.


Subject(s)
Entrepreneurship/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Governing Board/ethics , Libraries, Medical , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Health Care , Standard of Care/ethics , Complicity , Evidence-Based Medicine/ethics , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Information Services/standards , International Agencies/organization & administration , International Agencies/standards , Libraries, Medical/organization & administration , Libraries, Medical/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/ethics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Patient Care Planning , Philosophy, Medical , Systematic Reviews as Topic
6.
AJOB Empir Bioeth ; 8(2): 128-136, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28949838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations can be very complex, and are often the setting for crisis situations. In recent years, Canadian health care organizations have faced large-scale systemic medical errors, a nation-wide generic injectable drug shortage, iatrogenic infectious disease outbreaks, and myriad other crises. These situations often have an ethical component that ethics consultants may be able to address. Organizational leaders such as health care managers and governing boards have responsibilities to oversee and direct the response to crisis situations. This study investigates the nature and degree of involvement of Canadian ethics consultants in such situations. METHODS: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with Canadian ethics consultants to investigate the nature of their interactions with upper-level managers and governing board members in health care organizations, particularly in times of organizational crisis. We used a purposive sampling technique to identify and recruit ethics consultants throughout Canada. RESULTS: We found variability in the interactions between ethics consultants and upper-level managers and governing boards. Some ethics consultants we interviewed did not participate in managing organizational crisis situations. Most ethics consultants reported that they had assisted in the management of some crises and that their participation was usually initiated by managers. Some ethics consultants reported the ability to bring issues to the attention of upper-level managers and indirectly to their governing boards. The interactions between managers and ethics consultants were characterized by varying degrees of collegiality. Ethics consultants reported participating in or chairing working groups, participating in incident management teams, and developing decision-making frameworks. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian ethics consultants tend to believe that they have valuable skills to offer in the management of organizational crisis situations. Most of the ethics consultants we interviewed believed that they play an important role in this regard.


Subject(s)
Bioethics , Consultants , Emergencies , Ethicists , Ethics Consultation , Governing Board , Health Services Administration , Canada , Decision Making , Ethics Committees , Governing Board/ethics , Health Services Administration/ethics , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Organizations/ethics , Qualitative Research
8.
Prog. obstet. ginecol. (Ed. impr.) ; 58(1): 4-13, ene. 2015. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-131267

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Elaborar un listado de condiciones más allá de las condiciones médicas de la OMS que puedan ayudar en la toma de decisiones durante el proceso de asesoría anticonceptiva. Métodos. Estudio Delphi en el que 27 expertos contestaron a 24 preguntas planteadas por los coordinadores del estudio. Se requirió un nivel de consenso igual o superior al 50% del total de expertos consultados en cada una de las preguntas con respuesta de escala nominal formulada. Resultados. Tras el proceso Delphi se realizaron 20 recomendaciones sobre cuestiones relacionadas con el consejo anticonceptivo: condiciones médicas, época de la vida, estilo de vida, estado laboral, nivel académico, nivel económico, actividad sexual, métodos anticonceptivos y cumplimiento con el régimen anticonceptivo. Conclusiones. El consejo anticonceptivo debe de contemplar, además de las condiciones médicas, los aspectos relacionados con el estilo de vida de la mujer para mejorar la adherencia al método anticonceptivo más adecuado (AU)


Objective. To present a list of factors that go beyond the medical conditions established by the World Health Organization to assist decision-making during the process of contraceptive counseling. Methods. A Delphi study was carried out, in which 27 experts responded to 24 questions posed by the study coordinators. At least 50% agreement among the experts on a nominal scale was required in each of the questions. Results. After the Delphi process, 20 recommendations were made on issues related to contraceptive counseling: medical conditions, stage of life, lifestyle, employment status, educational level, economic status, sexual activity, contraceptive methods and contraceptive adherence. Conclusions. In addition to medical conditions, contraceptive counseling should include issues related to women's lifestyles in order to improve adherence to the most appropriate contraceptive method (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Governing Board/ethics , Governing Board/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Planning Councils/organization & administration , Health Planning Councils/standards , Life Style , Contraceptive Agents/therapeutic use , Contraceptive Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Contraception/methods , Contraception/standards
20.
Trustee ; 64(9): 17-9, 1, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22132669

ABSTRACT

The board's compliance oversight responsibility starts with engaged, educated trustees. Learn the basics here.


Subject(s)
Governing Board/ethics , Governing Board/legislation & jurisprudence , Guideline Adherence , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...