ABSTRACT
Given the potential benefits of Group Purchasing Organizations in cost-containment efforts for hospitals on supplies and purchased services, an important question that remains unanswered is what conditions support or hinder the utilization of GPOs by hospitals. Therefore, this study explores the relationship between GPO use by hospitals and their market and organizational characteristics. Data on hospital GPO utilization and other organizational characteristics were combined with secondary hospital market characteristics. Panel logistic regression with random effects and state and year fixed effects analysis was used to examine the relationship between hospitals' utilization of GPO services and hospitals' organizational and market characteristics. Overall, the majority of hospitals utilized the services of GPOs. Specifically, the number of hospitals utilizing the services of GPOs increased slightly from 3290 (72.2%) in 2004 to 3337 (74.4%) in 2013. In regression analyses, hospitals utilizing the services of GPOs operated in an external environment with mixed levels of munificence, more dynamism, and less competition. Specifically, hospitals operating in a less munificent environment are more likely to utilize the services of GPOs. The study findings provide organizational decision-makers and policymakers' insights into how certain market and organizational factors influence hospital strategy choice, in this case, the use of GPOs.
Subject(s)
Group Purchasing/methods , Models, Organizational , Purchasing, Hospital/methods , Economic Competition/economics , Economic Competition/trends , Group Purchasing/standards , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Care Costs/standards , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/trends , Humans , Purchasing, Hospital/standards , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
Healthcare group purchasing organizations (GPOs) are considered to play an integral role in the healthcare supply chain by keeping prices low and helping all members of the healthcare system achieve their objectives. China has been exploring GPOs in the field of drug procurement since 2015, and there are currently three GPO models in Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. Although the three models operate differently and they have each been examined, they have all achieved certain results and demonstrated the ability to control drug expenditures. In 2018, the National Healthcare Security Administration implemented a national centralized drug procurement policy, also known as the 4 + 7 procurement policy ("4+7 Policy"). This policy context has also led to changes in the strategy for development of GPOs in China. GPOs need to explore strategies that do not overlap with the scope of 4 + 7 procurement, and they need to develop dynamic and personalized procurement plans that are more in line with first-line clinical practices to have a synergistic effect in combination with the "4+7 Policy." In the future, GPOs will grow rapidly in China. The number of GPOs need to be increased to prevent monopolies, and GPOs need to expand their diversified value-added services to perform more tasks in terms of supply chain management and data analysis.
Subject(s)
Drug Costs , Group Purchasing/economics , Group Purchasing/methods , Health Policy/economics , China/epidemiology , Drug Costs/trends , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Policy/trends , HumansABSTRACT
Strategic purchasing of health care services is widely recommended as a policy instrument. We conducted a review of literature of material drawn from the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Health Systems in Transition series, other European Observatory databases, and selected country-specific literature to augment the comparative analysis by providing the most recent healthcare trends in ten selected countries. There is little evidence of purchasing being strategic according to any of the established definitions. There is little or no literature suggesting that existing purchasing mechanisms in Europe deliver improved population health, citizen empowerment, stronger governance and stewardship, or develop purchaser organization and capacity. Strategic purchasing has not generally been implemented. Policymakers considering adopting strategic purchasing policies should be aware of this systemic implementation problem. Policymakers in systems with strategic purchasing built into policy should not assume that a purchasing system is strategic or that it is delivering any expected objectives. However, there are individual components of strategic purchasing that are worth pursuing and can provide benefits to health systems.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/economics , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Policy , Health Services/economics , Administrative Personnel , Europe , Government Programs , Group Purchasing/methods , Health Policy/trends , HumansSubject(s)
Group Purchasing/economics , Information Management/economics , State Medicine/economics , Cost Control/methods , Group Purchasing/trends , Humans , Information Management/organization & administration , Information Management/standards , State Medicine/standards , State Medicine/trends , United KingdomSubject(s)
Conservation of Energy Resources/methods , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/standards , Group Purchasing/trends , Materials Management, Hospital/methods , Waste Management/methods , Conservation of Energy Resources/economics , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/classification , Humans , Maintenance and Engineering, Hospital , Materials Management, Hospital/economics , Materials Management, Hospital/trends , United StatesSubject(s)
Drug Industry/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Sector/statistics & numerical data , Purchasing, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Diagnostic Imaging/economics , Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/trends , Group Purchasing/economics , Group Purchasing/statistics & numerical data , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Care Sector/trends , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Purchasing, Hospital/economics , Purchasing, Hospital/trends , United StatesSubject(s)
Group Purchasing/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Sector/statistics & numerical data , Antitrust Laws , Economic Competition , Government Regulation , Group Purchasing/economics , Group Purchasing/trends , Health Care Sector/trends , Health Care Surveys , Public Relations , United StatesABSTRACT
There's change afoot among drug distributors, who are hitting manufacturers with new fees. Those pricing pressures are expected to be felt elsewhere in the industry. "I think the impact will eventually ... be felt in some way by providers in increased cost or lack of product," says Larry Dooley, left, of Novation.