Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 122
Filter
1.
Femina ; 51(3): 147-150, 20230331. Ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1428721

ABSTRACT

A evolução contínua das áreas cirúrgicas se deve a estudos e pesquisas, avanços tecnológicos e desenvolvimento de equipamentos mais avançados. A cirurgia minimamente invasiva, incluindo a videolaparoscopia, histeroscopia e cirurgia robótica, tem sido impactada significativamente pelos avanços cirúrgicos. As técnicas minimamente invasivas têm se tornado padrão-ouro no diagnóstico e tratamento de doenças ginecológicas, proporcionando benefícios como redução do tempo cirúrgico, menor dor no pós-operatório e melhoria na qualidade de vida. O treinamento adequado do cirurgião e da equipe é fundamental para o sucesso do tratamento cirúrgico, e o desenvolvimento tecnológico e aprimoramento dos equipamentos impulsionam a cirurgia minimamente invasiva como uma área específica da Ginecologia. Métodos seguros de treinamento, como laboratórios de simulação, permitem o aprimoramento gradual das habilidades dos cirurgiões em formação, preparando-os para uma prática segura e eficaz. A literatura fornece ferramentas e conceitos para o treinamento em cirurgia minimamente invasiva, visando formar residentes e novos cirurgiões.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Care Team , Quality of Life , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Teaching/education , Technological Development , Surgical Oncology/trends , Medical Staff, Hospital/education
2.
Urology ; 150: 110-115, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32827535

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present a brief historical review of treatment options for pelvic organ prolapse with a focus on anterior vaginal wall defects and highlight changing practice patterns in the era of synthetic mesh controversy. METHODS: A MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed using the keywords pelvic organ prolapse, anterior colporrhaphy, and cystocele followed by a manual search of bibliographies. RESULTS: Ancient treatments included Hippocratic succession, local astringent, and use of pomegranates as crude pessaries. More sophisticated surgical techniques evolved in the 19th century with further refinement in the early 20th century. Numerous native tissue apposition techniques were popularized by Kelly, Kennedy, Burch, and Raz. Due to poor durability, surgeons sought alternate approaches including biologic and synthetic grafts. Synthetic transvaginal mesh (TVM) initially included use of Tantalum and Marlex to repair anterior wall defects. Both were eventually abandoned due to complications. TVM was re-designed, re-marketed, and re-introduced. Type 1 polypropylene monofilament TVM use became ubiquitous in female pelvic surgery peaking between 2004 and 2008. Initial promising outcomes were soon eclipsed by a surge of adverse events leading to multiple FDA warnings, reclassification to Class III, high-risk medical device, and ultimately a complete recall in 2019. CONCLUSION: The bidirectional pendulum swing on use of synthetic TVM has been occurring since its introduction 50 years ago. In the current era of mesh controversy, more practitioners are now revisiting previously described native tissue and biologic graft techniques. It appears that history has repeated itself.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Vagina/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Mesh/history , Treatment Outcome , Vagina/physiopathology
3.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(3): 467-474, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712324

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Entry into the abdomen during operative laparoscopy is a source of some controversy regarding the safest and most useful method. The objective of this review is to describe, compare, and contrast the most popular entry techniques. DATA SOURCES: Data were collected from the historical starting point until present day from English language journal articles and book chapters. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Descriptive accounts dating back to the start of laparoscopy in the 1970s and spanning to present day well-designed randomized controlled trials and Cochrane reviews were compiled to evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of abdominal entry techniques. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The most common sites of entry are the umbilicus and the left upper quadrant. Between the Veress needle, direct trocar insertion, and open entry there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that any of these offers a universal safety advantage. The Veress needle is still the most used among gynecologists and facilitates primary trocar placement. Direct trocar entry under laparoscopic visualization may be underused, is faster, and may result in fewer failed entries. Open (Hasson) entry can be more technically challenging, but may be best for patients with suspected intra-abdominal adhesions. CONCLUSION: Surgeon comfort is critical in choosing the entry site, method, and equipment. Surgeon familiarity with entry-failure troubleshooting, possible complications, and management is essential because major entry complications are rare in modern laparoscopy but critical because the essential steps of recognition and management can be lifesaving.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Abdominal Cavity/pathology , Abdominal Cavity/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/history , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Needles , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Instruments/adverse effects , Umbilicus/surgery
4.
Br J Cancer ; 123(10): 1471-1473, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32830203

ABSTRACT

Ovarian cancer surgery endeavours to remove all visible tumour deposits, and surgical technologies could potentially facilitate this aim. However, there appear to be barriers around the adoption of new technologies, and we hope this article provokes discussion within the specialty to encourage a forward-thinking approach to new-age surgical gynaecological oncology.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Medical Oncology/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy/history , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/trends , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Fertility Preservation/trends , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/trends , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Inventions/trends , Medical Oncology/history , Medical Oncology/trends , Morbidity , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/history , Robotic Surgical Procedures/history , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/trends , Therapies, Investigational/instrumentation , Therapies, Investigational/methods , Therapies, Investigational/psychology , Therapies, Investigational/trends
5.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(4): 542-547, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694091

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical and other procedures to alter the shape of the female external genitalia, especially the labia minora, are increasingly popular and controversial worldwide. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to delineate and complicate the medical and moral controversy around these vulvoplasty procedures, by describing how female genital aesthetics, their interpretation, and alteration vary over time, space, and culture. METHODS: The history of the Hottentot Venus is used as a pivot about which to consider current biomedical, anthropological, and ethical literatures regarding female genital appearance and its manipulation. Intersectionality describes how different systems influence each other to affect the agency of certain individuals or groups, and is therefore an ideal analytic method for biopsychosocial concerns of sex and informed consent. RESULTS: The 19th century anatomic study and display of Sarah "Saartjie" Baartman, the Hottentot Venus, defined a European vulvar ideal by demonstrating its opposite. Today, the ideal appearance of the labia minora is variable across cultures and nationalities, and various mechanical and surgical manipulations are sought or imposed upon women to bring their bodies into conformity with these ideals. CONCLUSION: For European audiences, Baartman exemplified a stereotypical association between genital appearance, sexual availability, and accessibility as a biomedical subject. These logical linkages were a by-product of sexist, racist, and colonial ideologies that have since fallen out of favor. However, their genital effects continue to influence bioethical considerations of genitoplasty into the present day. Chubak B. Historical and Ethical Perspectives on Vulvoplasty. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:542-547.


Subject(s)
Body Image , Cultural Characteristics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Internationality , Vulva/surgery , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/trends , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Vulva/anatomy & histology
7.
Gynecol Oncol ; 158(1): 188-193, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456991

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to review the surgical care related to training in gynecologic oncology, from past, present and future perspectives. A marked decline in the incidence of cervical cancer as well as improvements in radiation therapy have led to a reduction in the numbers of radical hysterectomies and exenterations being performed. Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is reducing the extent of cytoreductive operations, including intestinal surgery. The incorporation of sentinel lymphatic mapping has reduced the number of pelvic, paraaortic and inguinal lymphadenectomies being performed. Coupled with these changes are other factors limiting time for surgical training including an explosion in targeted anticancer therapies and more individualized options beyond simple cytotoxic therapy. With what is likely to be a sustained impact on training, gynecologic oncologists will still provide a broad range of care for women with gynecologic cancer but may be quite limited in surgical scope and rely on colleagues from other surgical disciplines. Enhancement of surgical training by off-service rotations, simulation, attending advanced surgical training courses and/or a longer duration of training are currently incorporated into some programs. Programs must ensure that fellows take full advantage of the clinical materials available, particularly those related to the potential deficiencies described. Changing required research training to an additional elective year could also be considered. Based on the perspectives noted, we believe it is time for our subspecialty to reevaluate its scope of surgical training and practice.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/education , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans
8.
Int Urogynecol J ; 31(2): 237-241, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31807799

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric vesico-vaginal fistula is a traumatic complication of prolonged obstructed labor in which pressure necrosis from the impacted fetal head destroys portions of the vesico-vaginal septum, resulting in continuous and uncontrollable urinary incontinence. Ancient evidence suggests that fistula cases have probably been occurring since the development of rotational delivery mechanics in anatomically modern humans hundreds of thousands of years ago. It is likely that attempts to repair such injuries also have a long history. The early history of vesico-vaginal fistula surgery was investigated to determine the earliest credible report of successful cure of this condition. METHODS: Historical review of vesico-vaginal fistula surgery was undertaken, focusing on the work of Henry Van Roonhuyse, a seventeenth century Dutch surgeon living in Amsterdam. RESULTS: Van Roonhuyse's clinical treatise entitled Medico-Chirurgical Observations (1676) was reviewed in detail and is described in this article. His technique for vesico-vaginal fistula repair included six essential steps that are still recognizable today: (1) use of the lithotomy position; (2) exposure of the fistula with a speculum; (3) sharp paring of the fistula edge prior to attempted closure; (4) careful approximation of the denuded edges of the fistula; (5) dressing of the wound with absorbent vaginal packing; (6) immobilization of the patient in bed until the repair has healed. CONCLUSIONS: Henry Van Roonhuyse is the most credible candidate presently known for having successfully repaired a vesico-vaginal fistula in the pre-modern era.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Obstetric Labor Complications/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/history , Vesicovaginal Fistula/surgery , Adult , Female , History, 17th Century , Humans , Netherlands , Obstetric Labor Complications/history , Pregnancy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Vesicovaginal Fistula/history
10.
Surg Innov ; 26(5): 630-632, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043119

ABSTRACT

The Greek surgeon-gynecologist Savvas Georgiadis from Phocaea in Asia Minor had performed in 1897 an innovative surgical operation in a young female patient, reconstructing her vagina. Having been educated both in Greece and France, specialized in gynecology, he became a famous surgeon in the Hellenic Hospital of Smyrna "Agios Charalampos," where the operation was masterfully executed. Although among the pioneers in neovagina techniques, Georgiadis still is searching his place among the important figures in the history of plastic surgery.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Plastic Surgery Procedures/history , Vagina/surgery , Female , Greece , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans
14.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 47(6): 213-221, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29574054

ABSTRACT

Uterine transplantation is the solution to treat absolute uterine fertility. In this review, we present the historical, medical, technical, psychological and ethical perspectives in human uterine transplantation research. We reviewed the PubMed database following PRISMA guidelines and added data presented by several research teams during the first international congress on uterine transplantation.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Infertility, Female/surgery , Uterus/transplantation , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , History, 21st Century , Humans
15.
Gynecol Oncol ; 149(3): 447-454, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29525276

ABSTRACT

Joe V. Meigs was a visionary clinician and an early adopter of radical techniques in the surgical treatment of ovarian cancer. His 1934 textbook "Tumors of the Female Pelvic Organs", consolidated his approach to this "hopeless" disease, with pearls on diagnosis, outcomes, and even speculations about the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Decades before adjuvant chemotherapy would prove of value, and in an era when sophisticated statistics were unheard of, he nonetheless tried to eke out what benefits he could using the methods available in his time. We transition his original findings and observations through the advent of platinum-based chemotherapy, retrospective cohort studies supporting the benefits of primary debulking, and finally the long-awaited randomized controlled trial. We aim to provide historical context for the underpinnings of how cytoreductive surgery has evolved into its current role in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.


Subject(s)
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/history , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/history , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
16.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 24(2): 66-75, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29474277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the historical background surrounding the early work of Dr. J. Marion Sims, who developed the first consistently successful surgical technique for the repair of obstetric vesicovaginal fistulas by operating on a group of young, enslaved, African American women who had this condition between 1846 and 1849. METHODS: Review of primary source documents on Sims and his operations, early 19th century clinical literature on the treatment of vesicovaginal fistula, the introduction of ether and chloroform anesthesia into surgical practice, and the literature on the early 19th century medical ethics pertaining to surgical innovation. The goals are to understand Sims's operations within the clinical context of the 1840s and to avoid the problems of "presentism," in which beliefs, attitudes, and practices of the 21st century are anachronistically projected backward into the early 19th century. The object is to judge Sims within the context of his time, not to hold him accountable to standards of practice which were not developed until a century after his death. RESULTS: A narrative of what Sims did is presented within the context of the therapeutic options available to those with fistula in the early 19th century. CONCLUSIONS: Review of the available material demonstrates that Sims' first fistula operations were legal, that they were carried out with express therapeutic intent for the purpose of repairing these women's injuries, that they conformed to the ethical requirements of his time, and that they were performed with the patients' knowledge, cooperation, assent, and assistance.


Subject(s)
Vesicovaginal Fistula/surgery , Black or African American/history , Enslavement/history , Ethics, Medical , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/ethics , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , History, 19th Century , Humans , Informed Consent/history , United States , Vesicovaginal Fistula/history
18.
Int Urogynecol J ; 28(4): 527-535, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27549225

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transvaginal mesh usage has been at the forefront of popular media and academic debate for the past 10 years. Several US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communications, society statements, and research articles have been written in an attempt to define and articulate the classification system, safety data, and efficacy of this approach to transvaginal surgery. In this review, we explore the history of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), review FDA and society statements, and research current practice in the United States. METHODS: We searched the English language literature using PubMed for articles related to safety and monitoring of transvaginal mesh and reviewed all FDA publication and notices and gynecology and urogynecology society statements on its use in the United States. We then reviewed 22 articles and grouped them into several sections. RESULTS: Mesh used to augment transvaginal repair of POP was introduced in the United States in 2005 without clinical safety and efficacy data. In the subsequent years of use, both major and minor complications were increasingly reported, leading to several FDA notifications and warnings. The type of mesh used, reporting and classifications systems, and provider usage has varied widely over time. CONCLUSION: We present a historical review of transvaginal mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States from 2005 to 2016. There continues to be heated debate among practitioners about balancing the efficacy of mesh use to decrease recurrent prolapse and complications. Research into safety and efficacy, along with tighter FDA regulations, is ongoing.


Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/history , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Surgical Mesh/history , Female , History, 21st Century , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...