Factors influencing the protective behavior of individuals during COVID-19: a transnational survey.

To slow the spread of infectious disease, it is crucial to understand the engagement of protective behavior among individuals. The purpose of this study was to systematically examine individuals' protective behaviors and the associated factors across countries during COVID-19. This causal-comparative study used a self-developed online survey to assess individuals' level of engagement with six protective behaviors. Analysis of variance and McNemar's test were employed for data analysis. Three hundred and eighty-four responses were analyzed. The majority of participants lived in three areas: Taiwan, Japan, and North America. Overall, the participants reported a high level of engagement in protective behaviors. However, engagement levels varied according to several demographic variables. Hand hygiene and cleaning/ventilation are two independent behaviors that differ from almost all other protective behaviors. There is a need to target the population at risk, which demonstrates low compliance. Different strategies are needed to promote specific protective behaviors.

Trends in non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) related community practice for the prevention of COVID-19 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected Ethiopia since March 13, 2020, when the first case was detected in Addis Ababa. Since then, the incidence of cases has continued to increase day by day. As a result, the health sector has recommended universal preventive measures to be practiced by the public. However, studies on adherence to these preventive measures are limited. OBJECTIVE: To monitor the status of preventive practices of the population related to hand washing, physical distancing, and respiratory hygiene practices at selected sites within the city of Addis Ababa. METHODS: Weekly cross-sectional non-participatory observations were done during the period of April-June, 2020. Data was collected using the Open Data Kit (ODK) tool in ten public sites involving eight public facilities targeted for individual observations. Ten individuals were randomly observed at each facility over two days a week at peak hours of public services. WHO operational definitions of the preventive behaviors were adopted for this study. Observations were conducted anonymously at gates or entrances of public facilities and places. RESULTS: A total of 12,056 individual observations with 53% males and 82% in an estimated age range of 18-50 years age group were involved in this study. There was an increase in the practice of respiratory hygiene from 14% in week one to 77% in week 10, while those of hand hygiene and physical distancing changed little over the weeks from their baseline of 24% and 34%, respectively. Overall, respiratory hygiene demonstrated an increased rate of 6% per week, while hand hygiene and physical distancing had less than a 1% change per week, Females and the estimated age group of 18-50 years had practice changes in respiratory hygiene with no difference in hand hygiene and physical distancing practices. Respiratory hygiene took about six weeks to reach a level of 77% from its baseline of 24%, making an increment of about 9% per week. CONCLUSION: The public practice of respiratory hygiene improved threefold whereas hand hygiene and physical distancing revealed no change. Regularly sustained public mobilization and mass education are required to sustain the achievements gained in respiratory hygiene and further hand hygiene and physical distancing.

Utilizing the SEIPS model to guide hand hygiene interventions at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

We aimed to apply the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to increase effectiveness and sustainability of the World Health Organization's (WHOs) hand hygiene (HH) guidelines within healthcare systems. Our cross-sectional, mixed-methods study took place at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC), a tertiary care hospital in Jimma, Ethiopia, between November 2018 and August 2020 and consisted of three phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. We conducted questionnaires addressing HH knowledge and attitudes, interviews to identify HH barriers and facilitators within the SEIPS framework, and observations at the WHO's 5 moments of HH amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) at JUMC. We then implemented HH interventions based on WHO guidelines and results from our baseline assessment. Follow-up HH observations were conducted months later during the Covid-19 pandemic. 250 HCWs completed questionnaires with an average knowledge score of 61.4% and attitude scores indicating agreement that HH promotes patient safety. Interview participants cited multiple barriers to HH including shortages and location of HH materials, inadequate training, minimal Infection Prevention Control team presence, and high workload. We found an overall baseline HH compliance rate of 9.4% and a follow-up compliance rate of 72.1%. Drastically higher follow-up compared to baseline compliance rates were likely impacted by our HH interventions and Covid-19. HCWs showed motivation for patient safety despite low HH knowledge. Utilizing the SEIPS model helped identify institution-specific barriers that informed targeted interventions beyond WHO guidelines aimed at increasing effectiveness and sustainability of HH efforts.

Hand Hygiene, an Update.

Hand hygiene by health care personnel is an important measure for preventing health care-associated infections, but adherence rates and technique remain suboptimal. Alcohol-based hand rubs are the preferred method of hand hygiene in most clinical scenarios, are more effective and better tolerated than handwashing, and their use has facilitated improved adherence rates. Obtaining accurate estimates of hand hygiene adherence rates using direct observations of personnel is challenging. Combining automated hand hygiene monitoring systems with direct observations is a promising strategy, and is likely to yield the best estimates of adherence. Greater attention to hand hygiene technique is needed.

Hand hygiene in health care: 20 years of ongoing advances and perspectives.

Health-care-associated infections are the most prevalent adverse events of hospital care, posing a substantial threat to patient safety and burden on society. Hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub is the most effective preventive strategy to reduce health-care-associated infections. Over the past two decades, various interventions have been introduced and studied to improve hand hygiene compliance among health-care workers. The global implementation of the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy and constant efforts to replace the use of soap and water with alcohol-based hand rub have led to a faster and more efficient hand cleaning method. These strategies have strongly contributed to the success of behaviour change and a subsequent decrease in health-care-associated infections and cross-transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms worldwide. The WHO multimodal behaviour change strategy requires a series of elements including system change as a prerequisite for behaviour, change, education, monitoring and performance feedback, reminders in the workplace, and an institutional safety climate. Successful adoption of the promotion strategy requires adaptation to available resources and sociocultural contexts. This Review focuses on the major advances and challenges in hand hygiene research and practices in the past 20 years and sets out various ways forward for improving this lifesaving action.

Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 by education level among women and men in Germany. Results from the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study.

The main strategy for combatting SARS-CoV-2 infections in 2020 consisted of behavioural regulations including contact reduction, maintaining distance, hand hygiene, and mask wearing. COVID-19-related risk perception and knowledge may influence protective behaviour, and education could be an important determinant. The current study investigated differences by education level in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour regarding COVID-19 in Germany, exploring the development of the pandemic over time. The COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring study is a repeated cross-sectional online survey conducted during the pandemic in Germany from 3 March 2020 (waves 1-28: 27,957 participants aged 18-74). Differences in risk perception, knowledge and protective behaviour according to education level (high versus low) were analysed using linear and logistic regression. Time trends were accounted for by interaction terms for education level and calendar week. Regarding protective behaviour, interaction terms were tested for all risk perception and knowledge variables with education level. The strongest associations with education level were evident for perceived and factual knowledge regarding COVID-19. Moreover, associations were found between low education level and higher perceived severity, and between low education level and lower perceived probability. Highly educated men were more worried about COVID-19 than those with low levels of education. No educational differences were observed for perceived susceptibility or fear. Higher compliance with hand washing was found in highly educated women, and higher compliance with maintaining distance was found in highly educated men. Regarding maintaining distance, the impact of perceived severity differed between education groups. In men, significant moderation effects of education level on the association between factual knowledge and all three protective behaviours were found. During the pandemic, risk perception and protective behaviour varied greatly over time. Overall, differences by education level were relatively small. For risk communication, reaching all population groups irrespective of education level is critical.

[Evolution of adherence to hand hygiene in health care professionals in a third level hospital in relation to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic]. / Evaluación de la adherencia a la higiene de manos en profesionales sanitarios en un hospital de tercer nivel en relación con la pandemia de SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVE: Proper hand hygiene is the main measure in the prevention and control of infection associated with healthcare. It describes how the pandemic period of 2020 has influenced the evolution of the degree of compliance with hand hygiene practices in health professionals at the Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria with respect to previous years. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study of direct observation on compliance with the five moments of hand hygiene in the 2018-2020 period. Adherence is described with the frequency distribution of the different moments in which it was indicated. RESULTS: Total adherence has increased from 42.5% in 2018, to 47.6% in 2019, and 59.2% in 2020 (p <0.05). Total adherence was greater in the moments after contact with the patient (67%) than in the moments before contact (48%). The area with the highest adherence was dialysis (83%). There is a greater adherence in open areas than in hospitalization areas (65% vs 56%). Higher adherence was determined in physicians (73%) and nurses (74%), than in nursing assistants (50%) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In 2020 there was an increase in adherence to hand hygiene compared to previous years. A higher percentage of adherence was determined in physicians and nurses than in nursing assistants. We consider that the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has played a relevant role in this increase in adherence.

Hand-hygiene-related clinical trials reported between 2014 and 2020: a comprehensive systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There is general consensus that hand hygiene is the most effective way to prevent healthcare-associated infections. However, low rates of compliance amongst healthcare workers have been reported globally. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has further emphasized the need for global improvement in hand hygiene compliance by healthcare workers. AIM: This comprehensive systematic review provides an up-to-date compilation of clinical trials, reported between 2014 and 2020, assessing hand hygiene interventions in order to inform healthcare leaders and practitioners regarding approaches to reduce healthcare-associated infections using hand hygiene. METHODS: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMbase, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical trials published between March 2014 and December 2020 on the topic of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers. In total, 332 papers were identified from these searches, of which 57 studies met the inclusion criteria. FINDINGS: Forty-five of the 57 studies (79%) included in this review were conducted in Asia, Europe and the USA. The large majority of these clinical trials were conducted in acute care facilities, including hospital wards and intensive care facilities. Nurses represented the largest group of healthcare workers studied (44 studies, 77%), followed by physicians (41 studies, 72%). Thirty-six studies (63%) adopted the World Health Organization's multi-modal framework or a variation of this framework, and many of them recorded hand hygiene opportunities at each of the 'Five Moments'. However, recording of hand hygiene technique was not common. CONCLUSION: Both single intervention and multi-modal hand hygiene strategies can achieve modest-to-moderate improvements in hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hand hygiene performance in hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Achieving high levels of hand hygiene compliance of health care personnel has been an ongoing challenge. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hand hygiene performance (HHP) rates in acute care hospitals. METHODS: HHP rates were estimated using an automated hand hygiene monitoring system installed in 74 adult inpatient units in 7 hospitals and 10 pediatric inpatient units in 2 children's hospitals. A segmented regression model was used to estimate the trajectory of HHP rates in the 10 weeks leading up to a COVID-19-related milestone event (eg, school closures) and for 10 weeks after. RESULTS: Three effects emerged, all of which were significant at P < .01. Average HHP rates increased from 46% to 56% in the months preceding pandemic-related school closures. This was followed by a 6% upward shift at the time school closures occurred. HHP rates remained over 60% for 4 weeks before declining to 54% at the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Data from an automated hand hygiene monitoring system indicated that HHP shifted in multiple directions during the early stages of the pandemic. We discuss possible reasons why HHP first increased as the pandemic began and then decreased as it progressed.

Community interventions in Low-And Middle-Income Countries to inform COVID-19 control implementation decisions in Kenya: A rapid systematic review.

Globally, public health measures like face masks, hand hygiene and maintaining social distancing have been implemented to delay and reduce local transmission of COVID-19. To date there is emerging evidence to provide effectiveness and compliance to intervention measures on COVID-19 due to rapid spread of the disease. We synthesized evidence of community interventions and innovative practices to mitigate COVID-19 as well as previous respiratory outbreak infections which may share some aspects of transmission dynamics with COVID-19. In the study, we systematically searched the literature on community interventions to mitigate COVID-19, SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), H1N1 Influenza and MERS (middle east respiratory syndrome) epidemics in PubMed, Google Scholar, World Health Organization (WHO), MEDRXIV and Google from their inception until May 30, 2020 for up-to-date published and grey resources. We screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicates. We rated the certainty of evidence according to Cochrane methods and the GRADE approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020183064). Of 41,138 papers found, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria in various settings in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). One of the papers from LMICs originated from Africa (Madagascar) with the rest from Asia 9 (China 5, Bangladesh 2, Thailand 2); South America 5 (Mexico 3, Peru 2) and Europe 2 (Serbia and Romania). Following five studies on the use of face masks, the risk of contracting SARS and Influenza was reduced OR 0.78 and 95% CI = 0.36-1.67. Equally, six studies on hand hygiene practices reported a reduced risk of contracting SARS and Influenza OR 0.95 and 95% CI = 0.83-1.08. Further two studies that looked at combined use of face masks and hand hygiene interventions showed the effectiveness in controlling the transmission of influenza OR 0.94 and 95% CI = 0.58-1.54. Nine studies on social distancing intervention demonstrated the importance of physical distance through closure of learning institutions on the transmission dynamics of disease. The evidence confirms the use of face masks, good hand hygiene and social distancing as community interventions are effective to control the spread of SARS and influenza in LMICs. However, the effectiveness of community interventions in LMICs should be informed by adherence of the mitigation measures and contextual factors taking into account the best practices. The study has shown gaps in adherence/compliance of the interventions, hence a need for robust intervention studies to better inform the evidence on compliance of the interventions. Nevertheless, this rapid review of currently best available evidence might inform interim guidance on similar respiratory infectious diseases like Covid-19 in Kenya and similar LMIC context.

[Evolution of hand hygiene adherence of health professionals of specialized care.] / Evolución de la adherencia a la higiene de manos en un hospital de la Comunidad de Madrid.

OBJECTIVE: Hand hygiene (HH) is essential for the prevention of health care-associated infections (HAIs). Compliance rates documented in Spain and internationally are low, although improvement is possible using some strategies and training. The aim of this study was to know the evolution of the adherence to the 5 moments for hand hygiene of the health professionals of the Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón and to propose measures to implement it. METHODS: A direct observation study about the compliance of the 5 moments for HH in this hospital for seven years was carried out. Different professional groups received training, using the traditional method and simulation learning. The data was summarized using percentages and absolute frequencies. They were analyzed using SPSS version 21 for Windows. RESULTS: Adherence increased from 37% in 2011 to 57.8% in 2019. Compliance in the 5 moments was higher after patient contact than before it. Nurses were one of the groups with the highest compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Even though they have improved, compliance rates need to be maintained and to increase especially in moments as crucial as before an aseptic procedure. Training and the implementation of strategies are key.

OBJETIVO: La higiene de manos (HM) es fundamental para la prevención de las infecciones relacionadas con la atención sanitaria (IRAS). Los índices de cumplimiento documentados, tanto en España como internacionalmente, son bajos, aunque una mejoría es posible utilizando algunas estrategias y formación. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de la adherencia a los 5 momentos de higiene de manos de los profesionales sanitarios del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, y plantear medidas para implementarla. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio de observación directa sobre el cumplimiento de los 5 momentos de HM en este hospital durante siete años. Diferentes colectivos profesionales recibieron formación, utilizando el método tradicional y aprendizaje mediante simulación. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo, con frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Se analizaron mediante SPSS versión 21 para Windows. RESULTADOS: La adherencia aumentó de un 37% en 2011 a un 57,8% en 2019. El cumplimiento en los 5 momentos fue más alto después del contacto con el paciente que antes de este. El personal de enfermería fue uno de grupos con mayor cumplimiento. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque han mejorado, se necesita mantener los niveles de cumplimiento, y aumentarlos sobre todo en momentos tan cruciales como antes de realizar una técnica aséptica. La formación y la implementación de estrategias son clave.

A Practical Approach to the Management of Cancer Patients During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: An International Collaborative Group.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread globally since being identified as a public health emergency of major international concern and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). In December 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia, known as COVID-19, was identified in Wuhan, China. The newly identified zoonotic coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is characterized by rapid human-to-human transmission. Many cancer patients frequently visit the hospital for treatment and disease surveillance. They may be immunocompromised due to the underlying malignancy or anticancer therapy and are at higher risk of developing infections. Several factors increase the risk of infection, and cancer patients commonly have multiple risk factors. Cancer patients appear to have an estimated twofold increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. With the WHO declaring the novel coronavirus outbreak a pandemic, there is an urgent need to address the impact of such a pandemic on cancer patients. This include changes to resource allocation, clinical care, and the consent process during a pandemic. Currently and due to limited data, there are no international guidelines to address the management of cancer patients in any infectious pandemic. In this review, the potential challenges associated with managing cancer patients during the COVID-19 infection pandemic will be addressed, with suggestions of some practical approaches. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The main management strategies for treating cancer patients during the COVID-19 epidemic include clear communication and education about hand hygiene, infection control measures, high-risk exposure, and the signs and symptoms of COVID-19. Consideration of risk and benefit for active intervention in the cancer population must be individualized. Postponing elective surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy for cancer patients with low risk of progression should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Minimizing outpatient visits can help to mitigate exposure and possible further transmission. Telemedicine may be used to support patients to minimize number of visits and risk of exposure. More research is needed to better understand SARS-CoV-2 virology and epidemiology.

[How to increase the health staff adherence to the hands hygiene protocol?] / ¿Cómo incrementar la adhesión del personal sanitario al protocolo de higiene de manos?

OBJECTIVE: Nosocomial infection is a frequent adverse event in health care. Hand hygiene (HH) reduces cross-transmission, but staff adherence is not always adequate. The objectives of this work were evaluating the effectiveness of the HH technique applied in the workplace and monitoring the adherence of the healthcare staff of a Hospital of Medium-Long Stay to the HH protocol. METHODS: Two cross sectional studies were carried out (2010-2012), to determine the prevalence of colonization of the hands of the staff by pathogenic microorganisms, a cross-sectional study (2015), to evaluate their knowledge of the HH technique and two cross-sectional studies (2015-2016), to evaluate the compliance of the protocol in the healthcare practice. The WHO Self-Assessment Framework was applied annually. The hydroalcoholic solution consumption was monitored as a process indicator. RESULTS: The prevalence of colonization of the staff hands went from 28.3% to 21.2%. Compliance with hand hygiene went from 39.5% to 72% and the results of the WHO Self-Assessment Framework went from an intermediate level with 287.5 points to an advanced level with 432.5 points. The consumption of hydroalcoholic solution went from 3.9 to 19.3 liters/1000 stays. CONCLUSIONS: Staff adherence to the HH protocol has increased, having significantly improved the compliance with the recommendations, the hydroalcoholic solution consumption and the HH level assigned to the hospital. The most effective measures to improve the results have been the development of specific improvement plans, having been decisive, the involvement of managers and the use of direct observation as a regular method of work.

OBJETIVO: La infección nosocomial es un evento adverso frecuente en la atención sanitaria. La higiene de manos (HM) reduce la transmisión cruzada, pero la adhesión del personal no siempre es adecuada. Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron evaluar la efectividad de la técnica de HM aplicada en el lugar de trabajo y monitorizar la adhesión del personal sanitario de un Hospital de Media-Larga Estancia al protocolo de HM. METODOS: Se realizaron dos cortes transversales (2010-2012), para conocer la prevalencia de colonización de las manos del personal por microorganismos patógenos, un estudio transversal (2015), para evaluar sus conocimientos sobre la técnica de HM y dos estudios observacionales (2015-2016) para evaluar el cumplimiento del protocolo en la práctica asistencial. Se aplicó anualmente el Marco de Autoevaluación de la OMS. Como indicador de proceso se monitorizó el consumo de solución hidroalcohólica. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa SPSS, versión 19.0. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia de colonización pasó del 28,3% al 21,2%. El cumplimiento de la HM pasó del 39,5% al 72%. Aplicando el Marco de Autoevaluación de la OMS se pasó de un nivel intermedio con 287,5 puntos a un nivel avanzado con 432,5 puntos. El consumo de solución hidroalcohólica pasó de 3,9 a 19,3 litros/1000 estancias. CONCLUSIONES: La adhesión al protocolo ha aumentado, habiendo mejorado significativamente el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones, el consumo de solución hidroalcohólica y el Nivel de HM asignado al hospital. Las medidas más eficaces para mejorar los resultados han sido la elaboración de planes de mejora específicos, habiendo sido decisiva la implicación de los directivos y el uso de la observación directa como método habitual de trabajo.

Global hand hygiene improvement progress: two surveys using the WHO Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework.

The World Health Organization (WHO) conducted two global surveys in 2011 and 2015 using the Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework. In 2011, 2119 health facilities from 69 countries participated, and in 2015, 807 health facilities from 91 countries participated. In total, 86 facilities submitted results for both surveys; their overall score increased significantly (P<0.001) from 335.1 [standard deviation (SD) 7.5] to 374.4 (SD 90.5). In terms of WHO regions, the scores for the Eastern Mediterranean, Europe and Western Pacific regions all improved significantly (P<0.01). This represents a snapshot of the current position of global hand hygiene improvement efforts, outlining facility progress and highlighting the value of such an assessment tool.

Cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve hand hygiene in healthcare workers in middle-income hospital settings: a model-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multi-modal interventions are effective in increasing hand hygiene (HH) compliance among healthcare workers, but it is not known whether such interventions are cost-effective outside high-income countries. AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multi-modal hospital interventions to improve HH compliance in a middle-income country. METHODS: Using a conservative approach, a model was developed to determine whether reductions in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSA-BSIs) alone would make HH interventions cost-effective in intensive care units (ICUs). Transmission dynamic and decision analytic models were combined to determine the expected impact of HH interventions on MRSA-BSI incidence and evaluate their cost-effectiveness. A series of sensitivity analyses and hypothetical scenarios making different assumptions about transmissibility were explored to generalize the findings. FINDINGS: Interventions increasing HH compliance from a 10% baseline to ≥20% are likely to be cost-effective solely through reduced MRSA-BSI. Increasing compliance from 10% to 40% was estimated to cost US$2515 per 10,000 bed-days with 3.8 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained in a paediatric ICU (PICU) and US$1743 per 10,000 bed-days with 3.7 QALYs gained in an adult ICU. If baseline compliance is not >20%, the intervention is always cost-effective even with only a 10% compliance improvement. CONCLUSION: Effective multi-modal HH interventions are likely to be cost-effective due to preventing MRSA-BSI alone in ICU settings in middle-income countries where baseline compliance is typically low. Where compliance is higher, the cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve it further will depend on the impact on hospital-acquired infections other than MRSA-BSI.

Sustained improvement in hand hygiene compliance using a multi-modal improvement programme at a Swiss multi-site regional hospital.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of sustained improvement in hand hygiene compliance at the institutional level is scarce. AIM: To assess the impact and sustainability of a hospital-wide improvement programme on hand hygiene compliance of staff. METHODS: Analysis of trends of hand hygiene compliance for all clinical staff, measured through direct observation by trained observers, within a 450-bed multi-centre teaching hospital in the county of Neuchâtel, Switzerland. INTERVENTION: Implementation of a multi-modal improvement programme based on the World Health Organization (WHO) strategy, with the goal of reaching overall compliance of at least 80%. The strategy content included increasing access to alcohol hand rub; healthcare worker education; two-month interval compliance measurement; and hospital-wide open communication about ward-level results, point-of-care reminders, communication via a dedicated in-house newsletter and leadership engagement. The implementation phase was followed by a consolidation phase. FINDINGS: In total, 33,476 observations were collected from September 2012 to March 2014 (mean >3000 opportunities per audit). Overall compliance improved from 61.4% at baseline to 83.6% after the 18-month improvement programme (P<0.001), and was sustained at 85.3% 18 months later (i.e. 18 months after the programme finished) (P=0.08). The same trend (significant and clinically relevant improvement during the intervention, sustained after 18 months) was measured for all professional categories. CONCLUSIONS: This WHO-inspired improvement programme was associated with a significant improvement in hand hygiene compliance, globally and for each professional category. The results were sustained over an 18-month period.

Adhesión a la higiene de las manos por el equipo de enfermería en la unidad de cuidados intensivos / Adesão à higienização das mãos pela equipe de enfermagem em unidade de terapia intensiva / Adhesion to hand hygiene by nursing team in intensive care unit

Objetivo: Identificar la adhesión a la Higienización de las manos de los profesionales de enfermería de una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos para adultos de un hospital universitario público. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo, transversal, observacional, con abordaje cuantitativo, realizado con 68 profesionales en un hospital universitario del estado de Paraná, Brasil. La recolección de datos ocurrió de mayo a octubre de 2016, por 100 horas de observación directa. Se elaboró un formulario para caracterizar a los participantes y utilizado el Instrumento Adaptado del Manual para Observadores - Estrategia Multimodal de la Organización Mundial de Salud para la Mejora de la Higienización de las manos. Los datos fueron sometidos al análisis descriptivo, en medidas de proporción, y al test Chi-cuadrado de Pearson, en el Software SPSS versión 18.0, para verificar la asociación entre la adhesión y la no adhesión a la HM en cada uno de los cinco momentos recomendados y entre los profesionales (enfermero o técnico de enfermería), considerando nivel de significancia del 5%. Resultados: Eran enfermeros 12 (17,6%) profesionales y 56 (82,4%) técnicos de enfermería. La tasa de adhesión general a la Higienización de las manos por el equipo de enfermería fue de 311 (47,8%). No hubo adhesión al momento "antes de la realización de procedimientos asépticos". Los momentos "después" presentaron mayores índices de adhesión. Conclusión: La tasa de adhesión a la HM fue muy baja, y la práctica de higiene antes del contacto con el paciente crítico necesita ser mejorada con mayor urgencia

Objetivo: Identificar a adesão à Higienização das Mãos dos profissionais de enfermagem de uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva para adultos de um hospital universitário público. Metodologia: Estudo descritivo, transversal, observacional, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado com 68 profissionais em um hospital universitário do estado do Paraná, Brasil. A coleta de dados ocorreu de maio a outubro de 2016, por 100 horas de observação direta. Foi elaborado um formulário para caracterização dos participantes e utilizado o Instrumento Adaptado do Manual para Observadores - Estratégia Multimodal da Organização Mundial de Saúde para Melhoria da Higienização das Mãos. Os dados foram submetidos à análise descritiva, em medidas de proporção, e ao teste Qui-Quadrado de Pearson, no Software SPSS versão 18.0, para verificar a associação entre a adesão e a não adesão à HM em cada um dos cinco momentos recomendados e entre os profissionais (enfermeiro ou técnico de enfermagem), considerando nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Eram enfermeiros 12 (17,6%) profissionais e 56 (82,4%) técnicos de enfermagem. A taxa de adesão geral à Higienização das Mãos pela equipe de enfermagem foi de 311 (47,8%). Não houve adesão ao momento "antes da realização de procedimentos assépticos". Os momentos "após" apresentaram maiores índices de adesão. Conclusão: A taxa de adesão à HM foi muito baixa, e, a prática de higiene antes do contato com o paciente crítico precisa ser melhorada com maior urgencia

Objective: To identify adherence to Hand Hygiene (HH) of the nursing professionals of an Intensive Care Unit for adults of a public university hospital. Methodology: Descriptive, cross-sectional, observational study with a quantitative approach, carried out with 68 professionals in a university hospital in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Data collection occurred from May to October of 2016 for 100 hours of direct observation. A form was developed for characterization of the participants and the Adapted Instrument of the Handbook for Observers - Multimodal Strategy of the World Health Organization for the Improvement of Hand Hygiene was developed. Data were submitted to descriptive analysis, in proportion measurements and Pearson's Chi-Square test, in SPSS Software version 18.0, to verify the association between adhesion and non-adhesion to HH in each of the five recommended moments and among professionals (nurse or technician of nursing), considering a level of significance of 5%. Results: 12 (17.6%) were professional nurses and 56 (82.4%) were nursing technicians. The nursing staff received a general adhesion rate of 311 (47.8%). There was no adhesion to the moment "before performing aseptic procedures". The "after" moments presented higher accession rates. Conclusion: The rate of adhesion to HH was very low, and hygiene practice before contact with the critical patient needs to be improved with greater urgency

Control de la higiene de manos: observación directa versus tasa autorreportada / Monitorização da higienização das mãos: observação direta versus taxa autorreportada / Monitoring hand hygiene: direct observation versus self-report rates

La higiene de las manos es una de las principales medidas de control de las infecciones. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar las tasas de adherencia a la higiene de las manos obtenidos por métodos de observación directa y la tasa autorreportada en una unidad de cuidados intensivos. Estudio transversal realizado en un hospital universitario, entre septiembre y diciembre de 2013. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de la observación directa del personal médico y de enfermería, y la aplicación de un cuestionario estructurado para identificación de las tasas de adhesión autorreportadas. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos y univariantes. El proyecto fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética. Se obtuvo un total de 1935 oportunidades para la higiene de las manos. La tasa de adhesión autorreportada fue de 87,9%, mientras que la tasa observada fue del 19,0% (p <0,001). La higiene de las manos simple fue referido como preferido por 70,2% de los profesionales de la salud, seguido de 12,3% de fricción con solución alcohólica antiséptica y 17,5% por ambos (higiene de las manos simple seguida de fricción con solución alcohólica antiséptica), y dichas tasas fueron similares en la adhesión autorreportadas y la observación directa. Las tasas de adhesión autorreportadas a la higiene de manos fueron sobreestimadas y las tasas obtenidas por observación directa fueron bajas, aunque no distinta de la escena mundial, reafirmando la necesidad de estrategias de implementación continua para la mejora de estas (AU)

A higienização das mãos (HM) constitui uma das principais medidas de controle das infecções. Objetivou-se comparar as taxas de adesão à HM obtidas por métodos de observação direta e taxa autorreportada em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. Tratou-se de um estudo transversal, realizado em um hospital universitário entre setembro e dezembro de 2013. Os dados foram coletados por meio da observação direta dos médicos e equipe de enfermagem e aplicação de um questionário estruturado para identificar a taxa de adesão autorreportada e sua percepção sobre tal procedimento. Foram realizadas análises descritiva e univariada. Foram acompanhadas 1.935 oportunidades para HM. A taxa de adesão autorreportada foi de 87,9% e a taxa observada 19,0% (p<0,001). A HM simples foi referida como preferida por 70,2% dos profissionais de saúde, seguido de 12,3% para fricção antisséptica e 17,5% para ambas (HM simples seguida de fricção antisséptica), sendo tais taxas semelhantes para a taxa autorreportada e observação direta. As taxas de adesão à HM autorreportadas foram superestimadas e as taxas obtidas pela observação direta foram baixas, embora não distintas do panorama mundial, reafirmando a necessidade de implementação de estratégias contínuas para melhoria destas (AU)

Hand hygiene is one of the main measure to control infections. This study aimed to compare hand hygiene adherence rates in an intensive care unit obtained through direct observation and self-reported compliance. This cross-sectional study was conducted in a university hospital between September and December of 2013. Data were collected through direct observation of healthcare workers from medical and nursing staff and the application of a structured questionnaire to identify self-reported compliance rates. Descriptive and univariate analysis were performed. A total of 1,935 opportunities for practicing hand hygiene was obtained. The self-reported hand hygiene adherence rate was 87.9% and observed adherence was 19.0% (p<0.001). Simple hand hygiene was reported as preferred by 70.2% of healthcare workers, followed by 12.3% for hand rubbing with alcohol and 17.5% for both (simple hand hygiene followed by hand rubbing with alcohol), such rates being similar for self-reported and observed rates. The self-reported hand hygiene rates were overestimated and the rates obtained through direct observation were low, although not distinct from the world scenario, reaffirming the need to implement continuous strategies to improve these (AU)

Hand Hygiene Improvement and Sustainability: Assessing a Breakthrough Collaborative in Western Switzerland.

OBJECTIVE To assess hand hygiene improvement and sustainability associated with a Breakthrough Collaborative. DESIGN Multicenter analysis of hand hygiene compliance through direct observation by trained observers. SETTING A total of 5 publicly funded hospitals in 14 locations, with a total of 1,152 beds, in the County of Vaud, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Clinical staff. INTERVENTIONS In total, 59,272 opportunities for hand hygiene were monitored for the duration of the study, for an average of 5,921 per audit (range, 5,449-6,852). An 18-month Hand Hygiene Breakthrough Collaborative was conducted to implement the WHO multimodal promotional strategy including improved access to alcohol-based hand rub, education, performance measurement and feedback, reminders and communication, leadership engagement, and safety culture. RESULTS Overall hand hygiene compliance improved from 61.9% to 88.3% (P<.001) over 18 months and was sustained at 88.9% (P=.248) 12 months after the intervention. Hand hygiene compliance among physicians increased from 62% to 85% (P<.001) and finally 86% at follow-up (P=.492); for nursing staff, compliance improved from 64% to 90% (P<.001) and finally 90% at follow-up (P=.464); for physiotherapists compliance improved from 50% to 90% (P<.001) and finally 91% at follow-up (P=.619); for X-ray technicians compliance improved from 45% to 80% (P<.001) and finally 81% at follow-up (P=.686). Hand hygiene compliance also significantly increased with sustained improvement across all hand hygiene indications and all hospitals. CONCLUSIONS A rigorously conducted multicenter project combining the Breakthrough Collaborative method for its structure and the WHO multimodal strategy for content and measurement was associated with significant and substantial improvement in compliance across all professions, all hand hygiene indications, and all participating hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1420-1427.