Ethnic Disparities for Survival and Mortality in New Zealand Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: It is essential to identify inequitable cancer care for ethnic minority groups, which may allow policy change associated with improved survival and decreased mortality and morbidity. Objective: To investigate ethnic disparities in survival and mortality among New Zealand (NZ) patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and the association of other variables, including socioeconomic status, tumor stage, and age at diagnosis, with survival rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among NZ patients diagnosed with specific HNCs from 2010 to 2020. Anonymized data were obtained from the NZ Cancer Registry, including patients diagnosed from International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes C00-C14 and C30-C32. Data were analyzed from July 2020 through January 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Censored Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyze survival distribution. Cox regression models were used to estimate the association of age, tumor stage at diagnosis, and socioeconomic status with survival rates. Age-standardized mortality rates were assessed. Results: Among 6593 patients with HNCs (4590 males [69.6%]; 4187 patients aged 51-75 years [63.5%]), there were 706 Maori individuals (10.7%) and 5887 individuals with other ethnicity (89.3%), including 4327 NZ European individuals (65.6%; defined as New Zealanders of European descent). Maori individuals had a decreased survival proportion at all years after diagnosis compared with individuals with other ethnicity (eg, 66.1% [95% CI, 62.6%% to 69.8%] vs 71.2% [95% CI, 70.0% to 72.4%] at 2 years). At 1 year after diagnosis, Maori individuals did not have a significantly increased mortality rate compared with 5795 individuals with other ethnicity with data (193 deaths [27.3%] vs 1400 deaths [24.2%]; P = .06), but the rate was significantly increased at 5 years after diagnosis (277 deaths [39.3%] vs 2034 deaths [35.1%]; P = .03); there was greater disparity compared with NZ European individuals (1 year: 969 deaths [22.4%]; P = .003; 5 years: 1441 deaths [33.3%]; P = .002). There were persistent age-adjusted mortality rate disparities: 40.1% (95% CI, -25.9% to 71.2%) for Maori individuals and 18.8% (95% CI, -15.4% to 24.4%) for individuals with other ethnicity. Maori individuals were diagnosed at a mean age of 58.0 years (95% CI, 57.1-59.1 years) vs 64.3 years. (95% CI, 64.0-64.7 years) for individuals with other ethnicity, or 5 to 7 years younger, and died at mean age of 63.5 years (95% CI, 62.0-64.9 years) compared with 72.3 years (95% CI, 71.8-72.9 years) for individuals with other ethnicity, or 7 to 10 years earlier. Maori individuals presented with proportionally more advanced disease (only localized disease, 102 patients [14.5%; 95% CI, 12.0%-17.4%] vs 1413 patients [24.0%; 95% CI, 22.9%-25.1%]; P < .001) and showed an increase in regional lymph nodes (276 patients [39.1%; 95% CI, 35.5%-42.9%] vs 1796 patients [30.5%; 95% CI, 29.3%-31.8%]; P < .001) at diagnosis compared with individuals with other ethnicity. Socioeconomic status was not associated with survival. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that Maori individuals experienced worse survival outcomes and greater mortality rates from HNC in NZ and presented with more advanced disease at a younger age. These findings suggest the need for further research to alleviate these disparities, highlight the importance of research into minority populations with HNC globally, and may encourage equity research for all cancers.

Long-term outcomes and prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the head and neck: a cohort from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasm is a rare cancer of head and neck. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine neoplasm of head and neck treated at a single institution. METHODS: Between Nov 2000 and Nov 2021, ninety-three patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck treated at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial treatments included chemotherapy (induction, adjuvant, or concurrent) combined with radiotherapy in 40 patients (C + RT group), surgery followed by post-operative RT in 34 (S + RT group), and surgery plus salvage therapy in 19 patients (S + Sa group). RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 64.5 months. 5-year overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival free rate (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS) were 64.5%, 51.6%, 66.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. For stage I-II, the 5-year LRRFS for patients' treatment regimen with or without radiotherapy (C + RT and S + RT groups versus S + Sa group) was 75.0% versus 12.7% (p = 0.015) while for stage III-IV, the 5-year LRRFS was 77.8% versus 50.0% (p = 0.006). The 5-year DMFS values for patients with or without systemic therapy (C + RT group versus S + RT or S + Sa) were 71.2% and 51.5% (p = 0.075). 44 patients (47.3%) experienced treatment failure and distant metastasis was the main failure pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy improved local-regional control and played an important role in the management of HNNENs. The optimal treatment regimen for HNNENs remains the combination of local and systemic treatments.

Preliminary outcomes of boron neutron capture therapy for head and neck cancers as a treatment covered by public health insurance system in Japan: Real-world experiences over a 2-year period.

PURPOSE: Since June 2020, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been a health care service covered by health insurance in Japan to treat locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of BNCT as a health insurance treatment and explore its role among the standard treatment modalities for head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who were treated using BNCT at Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, between June 2020 and May 2022. We assessed objective response rates based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Additionally, we conducted a survival analysis and explored the factors that contributed to the treatment results. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (72 treatments) were included in the study, with a median observation period of 15 months. The objective response rate was 80.5%, and the 1-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 57.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.9%-68.3%), 42.2% (95% CI: 30.1%-53.8%), and 75.4% (95% CI: 62.5%-84.5%), respectively. Locoregional control was significantly longer in patients with earlier TNM staging and no history of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: BNCT may be an effective treatment option for locally advanced or recurrent unresectable head and neck cancers with no other definitive therapies. If definitive surgery or radiation therapy are not feasible, BNCT should be considered at early disease stages.

Lymph node metastasis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to assess the impact of parotid lymph nodes (LNs) on the prognosis of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNcSCC), and to develop an alternative LN assessment method to enhance locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) stratification. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with surgically treated HNcSCC. Primary outcome variables were LRC and OS. The influence of parotid LNs and different LN assessment methods on prognosis was analyzed using Cox models, and comparisons were made using the C-index, Akaike Information Criterion, and Bayesian Information Criterion. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included. Both intraparotid and periparotid LN statuses significantly linked with prognosis. The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in cervical LNs, rather than parotid LNs, was predictive of decreased LRC and OS. In the Cox analysis, only N3 of the AJCC N classification, when compared to N0, showed reduced LRC and OS. In comparison to N0P1, only N0P3/N1P1 and N2P2/N2P3 of the O'Brien staging system tended to predict poorer LRC, with no subgroup emerging as an independent predictor for OS. The proposed LN assessment method, based on the number of metastatic LNs and ENE status in cervical LNs, demonstrated superior performance in terms of C-index, Akaike Information Criterion, and Bayesian Information Criterion compared to other systems. CONCLUSION: Parotid LNs were significant determinants of prognosis in metastatic HNcSCC. The novel LN assessment method proposed (1-2 vs. 3-4 vs. 5 + or ENE) displayed similar survival stratification to the AJCC N and O'Brien staging systems.

A Retrospective Study of 291 Patients With Head and Neck Sarcomas: Treatment, Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors.

AIMS: Sarcomas constitute a group of rare malignant neoplasms, commonly subcategorized into soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and bone sarcomas. This study aims to describe the treatment modalities and outcome of head and neck sarcoma (HNS) patients in western Denmark and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence in HNS patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Aarhus sarcoma registry, The National Danish Sarcoma Database, and the Danish National Pathology Registry were used to identify HNS adult patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2022. RESULTS: Altogether, 291 patients were included in this study. The prevalent histological subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (16%; 48/291) and leiomyosarcoma (15%; 44/291) for STS patients (n = 230) and chondrosarcoma (10%; 28/291) and osteosarcoma (7%; 19/291) for bone sarcoma patients (n = 61). Surgery with curative intent was performed in 71% (164/230) and 70% (43/61) of STS and bone sarcoma patients, respectively. Clear resection was achieved in 59% (97/164) of STS patients and 44% (19/43) of bone sarcoma patients. Eighty-nine patients relapsed (STS n = 66, bone sarcoma n = 23) after a median time of 2.7/5.5 years for STS/bone sarcoma patients. The five-year overall survival rates were 45% for STS patients and 66% for bone sarcoma patients. The following factors were significantly, negatively associated with overall survival in STS patients: Age (hazard ratio (HR)) = 1.02, p < 0.001), tumour size ≥5 cm (HR = 1.75, p = 0.003), metastatic disease (HR = 3.17, p < 0.001), high grade tumour (HR = 2.24, p = 0.004), previous cancer (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), and high Aarhus composite biomarker score (ACBS) (HR = 4.56, p = 0.001). For relapse in STS patients, higher tumour grade (HR = 3.19, p = 0.014), intralesional margins (HR = 2.84, p < 0.001), ≥2 previous cancers (HR = 3.00, p = 0.004), and high ACBS (HR = 3.29, p = 0.047), were negatively associated. For bone sarcomas only higher age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.049) and intralesional margins (HR = 2.91, p = 0.042) were significant negative factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Multiple prognostic factors for overall survival and relapse were identified, especially for STS patients.

A Network Meta-Analysis of the Systemic Therapies in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The current standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) comprises concurrent radiotherapy (CRT) alongside platinum-based chemotherapy. However, innovative therapeutic alternatives are being evaluated in phase II/III randomized trials. This study employed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using fixed effects to provide both direct and indirect comparisons of all existing treatment modalities for unresectable LASCCHN. METHODS: We referenced randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to July 2023 by extensively reviewing PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, adhering to the Cochrane methodology. Relevant data, including summary estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were extracted from these selected studies and recorded in a predefined database sheet. Subsequently, we conducted a random effects network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: Based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values, the league table organizes the various treatments for OS in the following order: IC + RT&MTT, MTT-CRT, IC + CRT&MTT, CRT, IC + CRT, MTT-RT, IC + MTT-RT, and RT. In a similar order, the treatments rank as follows according to the league table: IC + CRT&MTT, MTT-CRT, IC + CRT, IC + RT&MTT, CRT, IC + MTT-RT, MTT-RT, and RT. Notably, none of these treatments showed significant advantages over concurrent chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Despite concurrent chemoradiotherapy being the prevailing treatment for LASCCHN, our findings suggest the potential for improved outcomes when concurrent chemoradiotherapy is combined with targeted therapy or induction chemotherapy.

The current standard treatment for advanced head and neck cancer involves combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy. However, there are ongoing trials exploring alternative therapies. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing treatments using a statistical method called network meta-analysis. Our analysis included data from randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and July 2023. We focused on overall survival and progression-free survival as key outcome measures. The results of our analysis showed that none of the alternative treatments demonstrated significant advantages over the standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Nevertheless, there is potential for improved outcomes when targeted therapy or induction chemotherapy is combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Assessing the Impact of Charged Particle Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC) is a radioresistant tumor. Particle therapy, primarily proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiation, is a potential radiotherapy treatment for radioresistant malignancies. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of charged particle radiation therapy on HNACC. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Medline until December 31, 2022. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included treatment-related toxicity. Version 17.0 of STATA was used for all analyses. Results: A total of 14 studies, involving 1297 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled 5-year OS and PFS rates for primary HNACC were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 66-91%) and 62% (95% CI = 47-77%), respectively. For all patients included, the pooled 2-year and 5-year OS, LC, and PFS rates were as follows: 86.1% (95% CI = 95-100%) and 77% (95% CI = 73-82%), 92% (95% CI = 84-100%) and 73% (95% CI = 61-85%), and 76% (95% CI = 68-84%) and 55% (95% CI = 48-62%), respectively. The rates of grade 3 and above acute toxicity were 22% (95% CI = 13-32%), while late toxicity rates were 8% (95% CI = 3-13%). Conclusions: Particle therapy has the potential to improve treatment outcomes and raise the quality of life for HNACC patients. However, further research and optimization are needed due to the limited availability and cost considerations associated with this treatment modality.

The predictive role of PD-L1 in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the predictive and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Recognizing the importance of PD-L1 in patient response to treatment, the main objective was to assess its impact on overall survival and progression-free survival in HNSCC patients. A thorough search of databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2010 to 2022, along with relevant articles and references, yielded 120 studies. Of these, 7 met the criteria focusing on HNSCC patients, PD-L1 expression evaluation, and treatment with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines and involved independent review and consensus for discrepancies. The primary outcomes analyzed were overall survival and progression-free survival in relation to PD-L1 expression levels in patients undergoing immunotherapy.Theseven randomized controlled trials selected had a total of 4,477 participants. Results showed that patients with positive PD-L1 expression experienced improved overall survival when treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, particularly those with high PD-L1 expression. However, PD-L1 expression did not significantly affect progression-free survival. These findings suggest that PD-L1 expression can be a predictive marker for better overall survival in HNSCC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, its influence on progression-free survival remains unclear, indicating the need for further research.

Circulating tumour cells predict recurrences and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at a high risk of developing recurrence and secondary cancers. This study evaluates the prognostic and surveillance utilities of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in HNSCC. A total of 154 HNSCC patients were recruited and followed up for 4.5 years. Blood samples were collected at baseline and follow-up. CTCs were isolated using a spiral microfluid device. Recurrence and death due to cancer were assessed during the follow-up period. In patients with HNSCC, the presence of CTCs at baseline was a predictor of recurrence (OR = 8.40, p < 0.0001) and death (OR= ∞, p < 0.0001). Patients with CTCs at baseline had poor survival outcomes (p < 0.0001). Additionally, our study found that patients with CTCs in a follow-up appointment were 2.5 times more likely to experience recurrence or death from HNSCC (p < 0.05) prior to their next clinical visit. Our study highlights the prognostic and monitoring utilities of CTCs' in HNSCC patients. Early identification of CTCs facilitates precise risk assessment, guiding treatment choices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of the tumor microbiome, molecular profiles, and immune cell abundances by HPV status in mucosal head and neck cancers and their impact on survival.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) comprises a diverse group of tumors with variable treatment response and prognosis. The tumor microenvironment (TME), which includes microbiome and immune cells, can impact outcomes. Here, we sought to relate the presence of specific microbes, gene expression, and tumor immune infiltration using tumor transcriptomics from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and associate these with overall survival (OS). RNA sequencing (RNAseq) from HNSCC tumors in TCGA was processed through the exogenous sequences in tumors and immune cells (exotic) pipeline to identify and quantify low-abundance microbes. The detection of the Papillomaviridae family of viruses assessed HPV status. All statistical analyses were performed using R. A total of 499 RNAseq samples from TCGA were analyzed. HPV was detected in 111 samples (22%), most commonly Alphapapillomavirus 9 (90.1%). The presence of Alphapapillomavirus 9 was associated with improved OS [HR = 0.60 (95%CI: 0.40-0.89, p = .01)]. Among other microbes, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis was associated with the worst survival (HR = 3.88; p = .008), while Pseudomonas viridiflava had the best survival (HR = 0.05; p = .036). Microbial species found more abundant in HPV- tumors included several gram-negative anaerobes. HPV- tumors had a significantly higher abundance of M0 (p < .001) and M2 macrophages (p = .035), while HPV+ tumors had more T regulatory cells (p < .001) and CD8+ T-cells (p < .001). We identified microbes in HNSCC tumor samples significantly associated with survival. A greater abundance of certain anaerobic microbes was seen in HPV tumors and pro-tumorigenic macrophages. These findings suggest that TME can be used to predict patient outcomes and may help identify mechanisms of resistance to systemic therapies.

Re-irradiation versus systemic therapy for the management of local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer that is not amenable to surgical resection is uncertain. We sought to compare outcomes among patients treated with and without re-irradiation in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of institutional registries identified 65 patients with local-regionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were ineligible for surgery. Forty patients (62 %) opted for re-irradiation with the remaining 25 patients (38 %) undergoing initial systemic therapy alone. All patients had measurable disease. Forty-three patients (66 %) were male and twenty-two (33 %) were female. The median age at the time of recurrence was 59 years (range, 39-84 years). The most common primary sites of disease were the oropharynx, (n = 25), oral cavity (N = 19), and nasopharynx (n = 11). The median interval from completion of prior radiation to the diagnosis of recurrent disease was 35 months (range, 2-102 months). RESULTS: Re-irradiation improved 2-year overall survival, (32 % versus 11 %), progression-free survival (31 % versus 7 %), and local-regional control (39 % versus 3 %) compared to systemic therapy alone (p < 0.05, for both). The likelihood of developing any new grade 3+ toxicity was significantly higher among patients treated by re-irradiation compared to those treated by systemic therapy (53 % vs. 28 %, p < 0.001). There were 3 treatment-related fatalities, all of which occurred in the re-irradiation group. The incidence of grade 3+ late toxicity was 48 % and 12 % for patients in the re-irradiation and systemic therapy cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although re-irradiation improved overall survival compared to systemic therapy for appropriately selected patients with local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer, the relatively high risk of toxicity must be considered.

Efficacy of radioactive 125I seed implantation in treating inoperable or refused operation head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE: This study aims to observe the curative effect of radioactive 125I seed implantation in treating inoperable or refused operation head and neck cancer. METHODS: Data from 132 patients with head and neck malignant tumors underwent computed tomography-guided radioactive 125I seed implantation from April 2004 to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the local control and survival rates. The logarithmic rank test and the Cox proportional risk model were used for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were enrolled. All tumors were confirmed to be malignant through pathological analysis. Herein, we revealed that the seeds were implanted at the primary tumor site (23 cases, representing 17.4%), recurrent (9 cases, representing 6.8%), or metastatic lymph nodes (100 cases, representing 75.8%). Three months after the operation, 96 patients were evaluated as effective, whereas 36 patients were considered ineffective. The median local control time was 16 months; the local rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were observed to be 75%, 47%, 35%, and 22%, respectively. The study reports a median survival period (OS) of 15 months. Additionally, the survival rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 61%, 42%, 31%, and 27%, respectively. Regarding side effects, skin or mucosal toxicity occurred in 14 patients. Grade I skin toxicity occurred in seven cases (5.3%), grade IV skin toxicity in one case (0.8%), grade I mucosal ulcer in four cases (3.0%), and grade I dry mouth in four cases (3.0%). The multivariate analysis showed that short-term efficacy and tumor site were independent prognostic factors (P < 0.001, 0.006, respectively). Additionally, the multivariate analysis showed that the independent OS influencing factors included D90, the longest tumor diameter, and short-term efficacy (P = 0.017, 0.001, <0.001). CONCLUSION: Radioactive 125I seed implantation is a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with inoperable or refused operation head and neck cancer.

Effect of Primary Site and Treatment Modality of Patients With Head and Neck Myoepithelial Carcinoma on Survival.

AIM: Epidemiological evidence on myoepithelial carcinoma is rare. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tumor primary site and treatment modality on survival in patients with head and neck myoepithelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on adult patients diagnosed with head and neck myoepithelial carcinoma between 2000 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to evaluate the effects of different tumor primary sites and treatment modalities on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 415 patients were enrolled. No significant differences in OS and CSS were found between different tumor primary sites (P > 0.05). Compared with partial excision, patients with total excision (HR = 1.65, 95%CI: 1.12-2.42) (partial or total removal of the organ in which the tumor is located and complete removal of the tumor) or no surgery (HR = 3.52, 95%CI: 2.05-6.03) had worse OS. Compared with surgery only, patients with radiotherapy only had poorer OS (HR = 4.69, 95%CI: 2.32-9.46) and CSS (HR = 6.72, 95%CI: 2.59-17.46), while no significant differences in OS (P = 0.120) and CSS (P = 0.847) were found among patients who received surgery combined with radiotherapy. In patients with AJCC III/IV, patients with radiotherapy only (HR = 4.51, 95%CI: 1.61-12.62) had poorer OS compared to those with surgery only, whereas patients who received surgery combined with radiotherapy had better OS (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.29-0.89). CONCLUSION: The tumor primary site may not affect the prognosis of patients with myoepithelial carcinoma, while the effect of treatment modality on prognosis is related to the primary site and stage of the tumor.

Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-412): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal therapy, 5-year overall survival for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is about 50%. We assessed the addition of pembrolizumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial, participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, unresected locally advanced HNSCC from 130 medical centres globally were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus chemoradiotherapy or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by investigator's choice of radiotherapy regimen, tumour site and p16 status, and disease stage, with participants randomly assigned in blocks of four per stratum. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Local pharmacists were aware of assignments to support treatment preparation. Pembrolizumab and placebo were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses (one before chemoradiotherapy, two during chemoradiotherapy, 14 as maintenance therapy). Chemoradiotherapy included cisplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for two or three doses and accelerated or standard fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy delivered in 35 fractions). The primary endpoint was event-free survival analysed in all randomly assigned participants. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040999, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2017, and May 2, 2019, 804 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=402) or the placebo group (n=402). 660 (82%) of 804 participants were male, 144 (18%) were female, and 622 (77%) were White. Median study follow-up was 47·7 months (IQR 42·1-52·3). Median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 44·7 months-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 46·6 months (27·5-not reached) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·68-1·03]; log-rank p=0·043 [significance threshold, p≤0·024]). 367 (92%) of 398 participants treated in the pembrolizumab group and 352 (88%) of 398 participants treated in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (108 [27%] of 398 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 100 [25%] of 398 participants in the placebo group), stomatitis (80 [20%] vs 69 [17%]), anaemia (80 [20%] vs 61 [15%]), dysphagia (76 [19%] vs 62 [16%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (76 [19%] vs 81 [20%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 245 (62%) participants in the pembrolizumab group versus 197 (49%) participants in the placebo group, most commonly pneumonia (43 [11%] vs 25 [6%]), acute kidney injury (33 [8%] vs 30 [8%]), and febrile neutropenia (24 [6%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group (one participant each from aspiration pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, pneumonia, and sclerosing cholangitis) and six (2%) participants in the placebo group (three participants from pharyngeal haemorrhage and one participant each from mouth haemorrhage, post-procedural haemorrhage, and sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy did not significantly improve event-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in a molecularly unselected, locally advanced HNSCC population. No new safety signals were seen. Locally advanced HNSCC remains a challenging disease that requires better treatment approaches. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Establishment and validation of a tumor-infiltrating γδT cell related prognostic gene signature in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

γδT cells are unconventional T cells only accounting for 1-5 % of circulating T lymphocytes. Their potent anti-tumor capability has been evidenced by accumulating studies. However, the prognostic value of γδT cells remains not well documented in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study, we utilized the TCGA HNSCC database to evaluate the infiltration of γδT cells and the association between γδT cells and clinicopathological factors by related gene signature, which were then validated by a total of 100 collected tumor samples from HNSCC patient cohort. Heterogeneity and functional characteristics of distinct infiltrating γδT cell profiles in HNSCC were then investigated based on the scRNA-seq data from the GEO database. We found higher γδT cell gene signature score was significantly associated with longer survival. Cox regression models showed that γδT cell gene signature could serve as an independent prognostic indicator for HNSCC patients. A high level of γδT cell-related gene signature was positively correlated with the infiltration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune score. Through scRNA-seq analysis, we identified that γδ+ Trm cells and γδ+ CTL cells possessed anti-tumor and immunoregulatory properties. Notably, we found a significant association between the presence of these cells and improved survival outcomes. In our cell-cell communication analyses, we identified that γδT cells have the potential to eliminate tumor cells through the secretion of interferon-gamma and granzyme. Collectively, the infiltration of γδT cells may serve as a promising prognostic tool, prompting the consideration of treatment options for patients with HNSCC.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of primary extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVE: Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PE-NHL) of the head and neck is the second common site of extranodal lymphoma, accounting for approximately one-third of all extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (E-NHL). However, in recent years, large-scale PE-NHL case studies in China and worldwide are rare and not comprehensive enough. This work analyzed the clinical manifestations, pathological features, immunophenotypes and diagnosis of PE-NHL, as well as the factors affecting the treatment and prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 74 patients who were diagnosed with head and neck PE-NHL and treated for the first time. The clinical manifestations, pathological features, and immunophenotypes were summarized, and the factors related to the treatment and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common site of this disease was the Waldeyer's ring, followed by the nasal cavity. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common type, followed by extranodal NK T-cell lymphoma nasal type. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 76.4%, 67.9%, and 59.3%. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 89.4%, 85.6%, and 63.2%. ECOG score ≥ 2, Ann Arbor stage III or IV and IPI risk stratification identifying patients as the high-risk group were independent risk factors affecting the OS of patients with PE-NHL of the head and neck. CONCLUSIONS: The most common site of PE-NHL in these Chinese patients was the Waldeyer's ring, but the incidence in the nasal cavity was higher than that reported in Western countries. Radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy had better efficacy than chemotherapy alone, and the prognosis depended on the ECOG score and clinical stage. IPI had a better prognostic value in patients in the high-risk group of head and neck PE-NHL.

Survival and complications after carotid resection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze oncologic outcomes and complications rate after common or internal carotid artery (CCA/ICA) resection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA statement. A systematic review and pooled analysis was performed for overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) (primary outcomes), and perioperative death rate (secondary outcome). RESULTS: A total of 276 patients (males: 76.7%, n = 191/249) with a median age of 59 years (n = 239/276; 95% CI 55.0-61.7) who underwent CCA/ICA resection for HNSCC were included. The median follow-up time was 11 months (n = 276). Estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years were 52.7% (46.9-59.2) and 29.8% (24.3-36.5), respectively. The median OS (95% CI) was 14 months (12-17). Estimated pooled DSS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years were 58.6% (52.7-65.2) and 34.6% (28.5-41.9), respectively. The median DSS (95% CI) was 16 months (14-19). The perioperative death rate was 6.9% (n = 19/276). CONCLUSIONS: CCA/ICA resection should be considered as a treatment option for accurately selected patients. Multicentric prospective studies are recommended to develop a predictive score guiding the decision-making process.

Depressive Symptoms, Systemic Inflammation, and Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer experience high rates of depression. Depression and systemic inflammation have been found to be associated in numerous cancer types, often independently from disease status. Depression-related inflammation may elevate the risks for poor tumor response to treatment and early mortality, and comprises a mechanism by which depression is associated with survival in head and neck cancer. Objective: To assess mediation pathways incorporating pretreatment depressive symptoms, pretreatment inflammation, and tumor response posttreatment on overall survival among patients with head and neck cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer treated in a single multidisciplinary head and neck cancer clinic from May 10, 2013, to December 30, 2019, and followed up for 2 years. Data analysis was performed from June 29, 2022, to June 23, 2023. Exposures: Patient-reported depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) at treatment planning; pretreatment hematology workup for systemic inflammation index (SII) score; and clinical data review for tumor response (complete vs incomplete) and overall survival. Main Outcomes: Two-year overall survival. Results: The total study cohort included 394 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [11.5] years; 277 [70.3%] males) with head and neck cancer. Among 285 patients (72.3%) who scored below the clinical cutoff for depression on the PHQ-9, depressive symptoms were significantly associated with inflammation (partial r, 0.168; 95% CI, 0.007-0.038). In addition, both depression and inflammation were associated with early mortality (PHQ-9: hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; SII: HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.71). The depression-survival association was fully mediated by inflammation (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64). Depressive symptoms were also associated with poorer tumor response (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and the depression-survival association was partially mediated by tumor response (HR, 9.44; 95% CI, 6.23-14.32). Systemic inflammation was not associated with tumor response. Conclusions: In this cohort study, systemic inflammation emerged as a novel candidate mechanism of the association of depression with mortality. Tumor response partially mediated effects of depression on mortality, replicating prior work. Thus, depression stands out as a highly feasible target for renewed clinical attention. Even mild symptoms of depression during the treatment-planning phase may be associated with higher systemic inflammation in addition to poorer tumor response to treatment and survival outcomes; therefore, depression should be clinically addressed.

Clinical implication of neck dissection for metastatic lymph nodes originating from non-head and neck regions.

BACKGROUND: Cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) from remote primary sites is rare in head and neck cancer. The efficacy of neck dissection is still being investigated for therapeutic benefits of local management in oligometastasis from non-head and neck cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of neck dissection (ND) in CLNM from distant primary cancers and identify factors contributing to improved survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case-control study enrolled patients who underwent ND for CLNM from distant primary cancer at Asan Medical Centre between January 2010 and December 2020. We analysed overall survival and association between clinical covariate and survival. RESULTS: The study included 31 (14 males, 17 females) among 114 patients. Ovarian cancer was the most common primary malignancy (32.3%). Patients with fewer than three metastatic lymph nodes, without extranodal extension and with adjuvant therapy after surgery had better survival rates. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: In patients with CLNM from a distant primary cancer, ND is beneficial as local treatment. And adequate selection of patients for ND is pivotal to improve prognosis.