Effectiveness of early palliative care in patients with head and neck cancer in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Early palliative care (EPC) benefits some cancers, but its clinical outcomes differ depending on patients' racial and ethnic disparities, and customs. To determine whether EPC improves symptoms, emotional distress, and quality of life among Taiwanese patients with early or advanced-stage head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Based on participants' pathological stages, they were categorized as having early and advanced-stage HNC. Those willing and unwilling to undergo EPC were assigned to the EPC and standard groups, respectively. Their daily cancer-related symptoms were assessed using the Distress Thermometer (DT) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), whose scores' concurrent validity was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Core Quality of Life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck 35 (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35) questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients (n = 93) diagnosed with HNC at Taiwan's Chia-Yi Christian Hospital from November 2020 to October 2022 were recruited. The patients voluntarily split into two groups: EPC groups and standard groups (23 and 11 in early-stage; 46 and 13 in advanced-stage, respectively). DT assessment showed significant emotional distress improvements for all patients with HNC who received EPC. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire indicated that, compared to standard interventions, EPC groups significantly improved the quality of life and some symptoms for both early and advanced-stage HNC patients. However, the EORTC-QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire found no significant difference between the two groups. Furthermore, advanced-stage patients' anticancer treatment completion rates with EPC and standard interventions were 95.35% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: EPC improves symptoms, emotional distress, quality of life, and treatment completion rates in Taiwanese patients with early or advanced-stage HNC. Nonetheless, further extensive clinical studies are required for validation.

Factors associated with shame and stigma among head and neck cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often suffer from shame and stigma due to treatment limitations or due to societal factors. The purpose of this study was to assess perceived body image, depression, physical and psychosocial function, and self-stigma, as well as to identify factors that predicted shame and stigma in patients with HNC. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 178 HNC patients from the outpatient radiation department of a medical center in Northern Taiwan. Patients were assessed for patient reported outcomes using the Body Image Scale (BIS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression Subscale (HADS-Depression Subscale), the University of Washington Quality of Life Scale (UW-QOL) version 4.0, and the Shame and Stigma Scale (SSS). Data were analyzed by descriptive analysis, Pearson's product-moment correlation, and multiple regression. RESULTS: The two top-ranked subscales of shame and stigma were: "speech and social concerns" and "regret". Shame and stigma were positively correlated with a longer time since completion of treatment, more body image concerns, and higher levels of depression. They were negatively correlated with being male and having lower physical function. Multiple regression analysis showed that female gender, a longer time since completing treatment, higher levels of body image concern, greater depression, and less physical function predicted greater shame and stigma. These factors explained 74.7% of the variance in shame and stigma. CONCLUSION: Patients' body image concerns, depression, time since completing treatment, and physical function are associated with shame and stigma. Oncology nurses should assess and record psychological status, provide available resources, and refer appropriate HNC patients to counselling.

[Help and support for smoking cessation : an integral part of the treatment of ENT cancer]. / Aide et accompagnement au sevrage tabagique : partie intégrante du traitement du cancer ORL.

Inform, prevent, educate and encourage are the key words must be the keywords of all stakeholders who take care of a patient with ENT cancer in order to potentiate the effectiveness of the different treatments but also to improve the quality of life of patients.

Les cancers ORL sont favorisés par le tabagisme. Beaucoup de nos patients ne connaissent pas les conséquences qui découlent de leur assuétude. Informer, prévenir, éduquer et encourager doivent être les mots clé de tous les intervenants qui prennent en charge un patient atteint d'un cancer ORL afin de potentialiser l'efficacité des différents traitements mais aussi d'améliorer la qualité de vie des patients.

Investigating oral somatosensory perception and oral symptoms of head and neck cancer patients: insights on eating behaviour.

PURPOSE: Sensory alterations and oral manifestations are prevalent among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. While taste and smell alterations have been thoroughly investigated, studies on their oral somatosensory perception remain limited. Building upon our previous publication that primarily focused on objective somatosensory measurements, the present work examined self-reported sensory perception, including somatosensation and oral symptoms, in HNC patients and evaluated their link with eating behaviour. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using self-reported questionnaires on sensory perception, oral symptoms, sensory-related food preference, and eating behaviour among HNC patients (n = 30). Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed to categorise patients based on their sensory perception. Correlations between oral symptoms score, sensory perception, sensory-related food preference, and eating behaviour were explored. RESULTS: Two distinct sensory profiles of patients were identified: no alteration (n = 14) and alteration (n = 16) group. The alteration group showed decreased preference towards several sensory modalities, especially the somatosensory. Concerning eating behaviour, more patients in the alteration group agreed to negatively connotated statements (e.g. having food aversion and eating smaller portions), demonstrating greater eating difficulties. In addition, several oral symptoms related to salivary dysfunction were reported. These oral symptoms were correlated with sensory perception, sensory-related food preference, and eating behaviour. CONCLUSION: This study presented evidence demonstrating that sensory alterations in HNC patients are not limited to taste and smell but cover somatosensory perception and are linked to various aspects of eating. Moreover, patients reported experiencing several oral symptoms. Those with sensory alterations and oral symptoms experienced more eating difficulties.

A comprehensive examination of mental health in patients with head and neck cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer present particularly considerable levels of emotional distress. However, the actual rates of clinically relevant mental health symptoms and disorders among this population remain unknown. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-compliant systematic review and quantitative random-effects meta-analysis was performed to determine suicide incidence and the prevalence of depression, anxiety, distress, posttraumatic stress, and insomnia in this population. MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register, KCI Korean Journal database, SciELO, Russian Science Citation Index, and Ovid-PsycINFO databases were searched from database inception to August 1, 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023441432). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to investigate the effect of clinical, therapeutical, and methodological factors. RESULTS: A total of 208 studies (n = 654 413; median age = 60.7 years; 25.5% women) were identified. Among the patients, 19.5% reported depressive symptoms (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17% to 21%), 17.8% anxiety symptoms (95% CI = 14% to 21%), 34.3% distress (95% CI = 29% to 39%), 17.7% posttraumatic symptoms (95% CI = 6% to 41%), and 43.8% insomnia symptoms (95% CI = 35% to 52%). Diagnostic criteria assessments revealed lower prevalence of disorders: 10.3% depression (95% CI = 7% to 13%), 5.6% anxiety (95% CI = 2% to 10%), 9.6% insomnia (95% CI = 1% to 40%), and 1% posttraumatic stress (95% CI = 0% to 84.5%). Suicide pooled incidence was 161.16 per 100 000 individuals per year (95% CI = 82 to 239). Meta-regressions found a statistically significant higher prevalence of anxiety in patients undergoing primary chemoradiation compared with surgery and increased distress in smokers and advanced tumor staging. European samples exhibited lower prevalence of distress. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with head and neck cancer presented notable prevalence of mental health concerns in all domains. Suicide remains a highly relevant concern. The prevalence of criteria-meeting disorders is significantly lower than clinically relevant symptoms. Investigating the effectiveness of targeted assessments for disorders in highly symptomatic patients is essential.

Quality of life, craniomandibular function, and psychosocial factors related to pain and movement in patients with head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of and the associations between health-related quality of life, pain, craniomandibular function, and psychosocial factors related to pain and fear of movement in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients diagnosed with HNC were recruited. Measurements of the maximum mouth opening range and pressure pain thresholds on the masseter muscle and the distal phalanx of the thumb were conducted, as well as a battery of self-report questionnaires were administrated, including the QoL Questionnaire (EORT QLQ-H&N35), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Spanish translation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD), and the short version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI-11). RESULTS: The study sample (66.7% men, mean age 60.12 [11.95] years) experienced a moderate impact on their QoL levels (57.68 [18.25] EORT QLQ-H&N35) and high kinesiophobia values (20.49 [9.11] TSK-TMD). Pain was present in 41% of the patients, but only 3.8% reported severe pain. 26.4% had a restricted mouth opening range, and 34.62% showed significant catastrophism levels. There were strong positive correlations between EORT QLQ-H&N35 and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.81), between NRS and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.74), and between PCS and CF-PDI-11 (r = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Patients with HNC experience negative effects in their QoL, related to their impairment in craniomandibular function. Fear of movement, pain intensity, and catastrophism are associated with poorer functionality; relationships that should be considered when attempting to improve health care.

Quality of life in 583 head and neck cancer survivors assessed with the FACE-Q head and neck cancer module.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is frequently affected in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. Due to the shortage of studies investigating long-term patient-reported outcomes, we investigated long-term HRQOL using the novel FACE-Q HNC Module. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional single-center study was performed, including all patients who underwent curative treatment for HNC between 2006 and 2013. All eligible patients (n = 863) were invited to participate of whom 540 completed the questionnaires. Additionally, a prospective longitudinal cohort of 43 HNC patients treated between 2020 and 2022 was included who preoperatively filled in the FACE-Q, and at three, six, and 12 months postoperatively. HRQOL domain scores were analyzed to visualize group characteristics by tumor site and type of surgical resection. RESULTS: Both surgical and non-surgical HNC treatments predominantly affected long-term functional HRQOL domains (eating, salivation, speech, and swallowing), eating distress, and speaking distress, with distinct profiles depending on tumor site and type of treatment. In contrast, few long-term intergroup differences between HNC patients were observed for appearance, smiling, drooling distress, and smiling distress. Longitudinal data showed significant deterioration across all functional HRQOL domains in the short-term following treatment. Patients predominantly reported long-lasting negative treatment effects at 12 months follow-up for functional domains, whereas psychological domains showed near-complete recovery at group level. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term, various function-related and psychosocial HRQOL domains still are affected in head and neck cancer survivors. The results may serve to better inform patients with regard to specific treatments and highlight HRQOL domains which may potentially be optimized.

Depressive Symptoms, Systemic Inflammation, and Survival Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Patients with head and neck cancer experience high rates of depression. Depression and systemic inflammation have been found to be associated in numerous cancer types, often independently from disease status. Depression-related inflammation may elevate the risks for poor tumor response to treatment and early mortality, and comprises a mechanism by which depression is associated with survival in head and neck cancer. Objective: To assess mediation pathways incorporating pretreatment depressive symptoms, pretreatment inflammation, and tumor response posttreatment on overall survival among patients with head and neck cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer treated in a single multidisciplinary head and neck cancer clinic from May 10, 2013, to December 30, 2019, and followed up for 2 years. Data analysis was performed from June 29, 2022, to June 23, 2023. Exposures: Patient-reported depressive symptoms using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) at treatment planning; pretreatment hematology workup for systemic inflammation index (SII) score; and clinical data review for tumor response (complete vs incomplete) and overall survival. Main Outcomes: Two-year overall survival. Results: The total study cohort included 394 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [11.5] years; 277 [70.3%] males) with head and neck cancer. Among 285 patients (72.3%) who scored below the clinical cutoff for depression on the PHQ-9, depressive symptoms were significantly associated with inflammation (partial r, 0.168; 95% CI, 0.007-0.038). In addition, both depression and inflammation were associated with early mortality (PHQ-9: hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; SII: HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.08-1.71). The depression-survival association was fully mediated by inflammation (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.00-1.64). Depressive symptoms were also associated with poorer tumor response (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and the depression-survival association was partially mediated by tumor response (HR, 9.44; 95% CI, 6.23-14.32). Systemic inflammation was not associated with tumor response. Conclusions: In this cohort study, systemic inflammation emerged as a novel candidate mechanism of the association of depression with mortality. Tumor response partially mediated effects of depression on mortality, replicating prior work. Thus, depression stands out as a highly feasible target for renewed clinical attention. Even mild symptoms of depression during the treatment-planning phase may be associated with higher systemic inflammation in addition to poorer tumor response to treatment and survival outcomes; therefore, depression should be clinically addressed.

Prevalence and persistence of depressive symptoms during the first year postdiagnosis in a large sample of patients with head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The experience of persistent depressive symptomatology during the first year postdiagnosis has implications for recovery and adjustment by one year postdiagnosis. The present descriptive study sought to examine the prevalence and persistence of mild to moderate-severe depressive symptomology and associated disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with HNC. MATERIALS & METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study at a single-institution tertiary cancer center. Depressive symptomatology was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), captured at diagnosis and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months postdiagnosis. HNC-specific HRQOL was measured using the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI). Four subgroups were defined by BDI scores over time: persistent-moderate/severe subgroup, persistent-mild subgroup, transient subgroup, and resilient subgroup. RESULTS: The distribution of patients (N = 946) was 65 (6.9 %) in the persistent-moderate/severe subgroup, 190 (20.1 %) in the persistent-mild subgroup, 186 (19.7 %) in the transient subgroup, and 505 (53.3 %) in the resilient subgroup. Across all four HNCI domains, patients in the persistent-moderate/severe subgroup failed to reach a score of 70 by 12-months postdiagnosis which is indicative of high functioning on the HNCI (aesthetics: M = 42.32, SD = 28.7; eating: M = 32.08, SD = 25.7; speech: M = 47.67, SD = 25.3; social disruption: M = 52.39, SD = 24.3). Patients in the persistent-mild subgroup failed to reach 70 in three of four domains. Patients in the resilient subgroup reached, on average, >70 on all HNCI domains. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is a considerable issue during the first year postdiagnosis. Avenues for screening and intervention should be incorporated into HNC patient care per clinical practice guidelines to optimize recovery and HRQOL.

A translation and validation of the French version of the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire 2 (F-GTQ-2).

BACKGROUND: Limitation of mouth opening, widely known as trismus, is a major symptom altering quality of life in individuals presenting from temporomandibular joint disorder or head and neck cancer. A French-language instrument addressing jaw opening limitation following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) or temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire-2 (GTQ-2) into French. METHODS: A French translation of the GTQ-2 was performed according to established international guidelines, leading to the French-GTQ-2 (F-GTQ-2). The validation study included 154 participants with trismus (minimum interincisal opening of ≤35 mm) following treatment for TMD or HNC and 149 age-matched participants without trismus. All participants completed the F-GTQ-2 and participants with trismus completed additional health-related quality of life questionnaires to allow for analysis of convergent validity. RESULTS: The F-GTQ-2 demonstrated retained psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 for the domains, jaw-related problems, eating limitations, facial pain and somewhat lower for muscular tension (0.60). Mainly moderate correlations were found when comparing the F-GTQ-2 to other instruments, which was in line with the pre-specified hypotheses, indicating satisfactory convergent validity. Discriminant validity was found with statistically significant differences in all domains of the F-GTQ-2 between trismus and non-trismus participants. CONCLUSION: The F-GTQ-2 can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to assess jaw-related difficulties in individuals with trismus due to HNC or TMD.

The Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire in China: Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement invariance.

OBJECTIVES: The Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) is a comprehensive scale for screening and assessing trismus in head and neck (H&N) cancer and temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) patients. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the GTQ in China, and to test its measurement invariance. METHODS: This study comprised 278 H&N cancer, 245 TMD, and 507 control patients. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were tested to assess the GTQ's reliability. The validity was evaluated through composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and correlation tests. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to investigate the GTQ's measurement invariance across clinical status and gender. T tests were employed to compare score differences across clinical status and gender. RESULTS: The Chinese version of GTQ scale shows excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The CR, AVE, and correlation values demonstrate the good validity of GTQ. The multi-group CFA supported configural invariance across clinical status but not metric invariance, while it supported strict invariance across gender. Additionally, t tests revealed that patients with H&N cancer and TMD scored higher than the control group, while males scored higher than females. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of GTQ serves as an effective tool for screening and assessing trismus.

Decisional Conflict and Decision Regret in Head and Neck Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Head and neck cancer (HNC) often requires treatment with a major impact on quality of life. Treatment decision-making is often challenging, as it involves balancing survival against the preservation of quality of life and choosing among treatments with comparable outcomes but variation in morbidity and adverse events; consequently, the potential for decisional conflict (DC) and decision regret (DR) is high. Objectives: To summarize the literature on DC and DR in HNC, to give an overview of its prevalence and extent, and to advise on clinical practice and future research. Data Sources: Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched up to February 24, 2023, including all years of publication. Study Selection: Eligible studies addressed DC and/or DR as primary or secondary outcomes with any instrument in HNC, except cutaneous tumors. Two mutually blinded researchers conducted screening and inclusion with support of an artificial intelligence assistant and conducted risk of bias (ROB) assessment. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for data extraction. ROB assessments were done using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (qualitative) and CLARITY (quantitative). Meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to obtain pooled prevalence estimates for DC and DR when at least 4 sufficiently clinically homogeneous studies were available. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of DC (qualitative, Decisional Conflict Scale, SURE questionnaire) and DR (qualitative, study-specific questionnaires, Decision Regret Scale, Shame and Stigma Scale). Results: Overall, 28 studies were included, with 16 included in meta-analyses for DR prevalence. The pooled prevalence of clinically relevant DR above the cutoff score for validated questionnaires (11 studies; 2053 participants) was 71% (95% CI, 58%-82%; I2 = 94%), while for study-specific questionnaires (5 studies; 674 participants) it was 11% (95% CI, 5%-22%; I2 = 92%). Only 4 studies investigated DC, showing a prevalence of 22.6% to 47.5% above cutoff values. Derived overarching themes found in qualitative studies were preparation, shared decision-making roles, information, time pressure, stress of diagnosis, and consequences. Conclusions and Relevance: Although limited data on DC and DR were available, the studies performed indicated that DC and DR are highly prevalent issues in HNC. Results suggest that study-specific questionnaires underestimated DR. The findings underscore the rationale to improve counseling and shared decision-making for this patient population.

Geriatric assessment and quality of life for 2 years in older patients with head and neck cancer.

Due to the location and toxicity of treatments, head and neck cancer (HNC) has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Objective: to assess the effects of geriatric-assessment (GA)-driven interventions on QoL over 2 years in older adults with HNC.EGeSOR was a randomized study of HNC patients aged ≥65, receiving a pretreatment GA, a geriatric intervention and follow-up (intervention) or standard of care (control). The primary endpoint was QoL score using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's (EORTC QLQ-C30) and HNC (QLQ-HN35) QoL questionnaires over 24 months.In total, 475 patients were included (median age: 75.3; women: 31%; oral cancer: 44%). QoL scores improved over 24 months with various trajectories, without significant differences between the groups. A total of 74% of patients (interventional group) did not receive the complete intervention. Cancer characteristics, functional status, and risk of frailty were associated with change in the Global Health Status QoL score.There is a need to develop an alternative model of implementation such as patient-centered health-care pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02025062.

Long-term cognitive, psychosocial, and neurovascular complications of unilateral head and neck irradiation in young to middle-aged adults.

BACKGROUND: With a growing, younger population of head and neck cancer survivors, attention to long-term side-effects of prior, often radiotherapeutic, treatment is warranted. Therefore, we studied the long-term cognitive effects in young adult patients irradiated for head and neck neoplasms (HNN). METHODS: Young to middle-aged adults with HNN (aged 18-40 years) and treated with unilateral neck irradiation ≥ 5 years before inclusion underwent cardiovascular risk and neuropsychological assessments and answered validated questionnaires regarding subjective cognitive complaints, fatigue, depression, quality of life, and cancer-specific distress. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to assess white matter hyperintensities (WMH), infarctions, and atrophy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (aged 24-61, 13 men) median 9.2 [7.3-12.9] years post-treatment were included. HNN patients performed worse in episodic memory (Z-score = -1.16 [-1.58-0.34], p < 0.001) and reported more fatigue symptoms (Z-score = 1.75 [1.21-2.00], p < 0.001) compared to normative data. Furthermore, patients had a high level of fear of tumor recurrence (13 patients [44.8%]) and a heightened speech handicap index (13 patients [44.8%]). Only a small number of neurovascular lesions were found (3 infarctions in 2 patients and 0.11 [0.00-0.40] mL WMH), unrelated to the irradiated side. Cognitive impairment was not associated with WMH, brain atrophy, fatigue, or subjective speech problems. CONCLUSIONS: HNN patients showed impairments in episodic memory and an increased level of fatigue ≥ 5 years after radiotherapy compared to normative data. Cognitive impairments could not be explained by WMH or brain atrophy on brain MRI or psychological factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257968 ).

Sentido de la enfermedad y afrontamiento en pacientes con cáncer de cabeza y cuello / Sense of the disease and coping in patients with head and neck cancer

El cáncer entraña la necesidad de llevar a cabo una movilización de los recursos físicos, instrumentales y psicológicos para lograr una adaptación óptima de la persona enferma a su nueva situación. Asimismo, el sufrimiento derivado de la enfermedad lleva a los pacientes a plantearse el sentido de la misma y genera cambios en distintas áreas de la vida. Objetivo: explorar el sentido que la enfermedad posee para los pacientes con cáncer de cabeza y cuello (en adelante CCC) y los cambios derivados de ésta, en relación con las relaciones interpersonales y prioridades vitales de éstos. En segundo lugar, explorar la relación del afrontamiento del cáncer en función del sentido dado a la enfermedad. Método: la muestra está constituida por 114 pacientes diagnosticados de CCC. Se utilizaron los siguientes instrumentos de evaluación: cuestionario de datos sociodemográficos elaborado ad hoc y Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC). Resultados: los pacientes que han dado un sentido negativo a la enfermedad se caracterizan por una mayor evitación cognitiva. Aquellos que han experimentado cambios positivos en sus relaciones personales se caracterizan por afrontar la enfermedad con mayor espíritu de lucha, y los que han vivenciado cambios en sentido negativo afrontan su enfermedad con mayor desamparo/desesperanza. Los pacientes que se dan prioridad a sí mismos obtienen una puntuación más elevada en fatalismo (U = 124,0), con respecto a los que tienen como prioridad su familia y los demás. Conclusión: se ha hallado una relación entre el sentido positivo y los cambios positivos en las relaciones personales con un afrontamiento más adaptativo de la enfermedad (AU)

Cancer implies the need to carry out a mobilization of physical, instrumental and psychological resources to achieve an optimal adaptation of the sick person to their new situation. Likewise, the suffering derived from the disease leads patients to consider the meaning of it and generates changes in different areas of life. Objective: to explore the meaning that the disease has for patients with head and neck cancer (hereinafter CCC) and the changes derived from it, in relation to their interpersonal relationships and vital priorities. Second, to explore the relationship between coping with cancer in terms of the meaning given to the disease. Method: the sample is made up of 114 patients diagnosed with CCC. The following assessment instruments were used: ad hoc sociodemographic data questionnaire and Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC). Results: patients who have given a negative sense to the disease are characterized by greater cognitive avoidance. Those who have experienced positive changes in their personal relationships are characterized by facing the disease with a greater fighting spirit, and those who have experienced negative changes face their disease with greater helplessness/hopelessness. Patients who prioritize themselves obtain a higher score in fatalism (U = 124.0), compared to those who prioritize their family and others. Conclusion: a relationship has been found between the positive sense and positive changes in personal relationships with a more adaptive coping with the disease. And less adaptive coping for those who target their own people, rather than family or others (AU)

Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs About Deintensifying Head and Neck Cancer Surveillance.

Importance: Surveillance imaging and visits are costly and have not been shown to improve oncologic outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, the benefit of surveillance visits may extend beyond recurrence detection. To better understand surveillance and potentially develop protocols to tailor current surveillance paradigms, it is important to elicit the perspectives of the clinicians who care for patients with HNC. Objective: To characterize current surveillance practices and explore clinician attitudes and beliefs on deintensifying surveillance for patients with HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was performed from January to March 2021. Guided by an interpretive description approach, interviews were analyzed to produce a thematic description. Data analysis was performed from March to April 2021. Otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were current practice, attitudes, and beliefs about deintensifying surveillance and survivorship as well as patients' values and perspectives collected from interviews of participating physicians. Results: Twenty-one physicians (17 [81%] men) were interviewed, including 13 otolaryngologists and 8 radiation oncologists with a median of 8 years (IQR, 5-20 years) in practice. Twelve participants (57%) stated their practice comprised more than 75% of patients with HNC. Participants expressed that there was substantial variation in the interpretation of the surveillance guidelines. Participants were open to the potential for deintensification of surveillance or incorporating symptom-based surveillance protocols but had concerns that deintensification may increase patient anxiety and shift some of the burden of recurrence monitoring to patients. Patient and physician peace of mind, the importance of maintaining the patient-physician relationship, and the need for adequate survivorship and management of treatment-associated toxic effects were reported to be important barriers to deintensifying surveillance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, clinicians revealed a willingness to consider altering cancer surveillance but expressed a need to maintain patient and clinician peace of mind, maintain the patient-clinician relationship, and ensure adequate monitoring of treatment-associated toxic effects and other survivorship concerns. These findings may be useful in future research on the management of posttreatment surveillance.

Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers are invaluable sources of support for individuals recovering from head and neck cancer (HNC). Accordingly, minimizing caregiver distress is essential to promote the well-being of both caregivers and their patients. This study assessed if psychosocial distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) among HNC caregivers is associated with a difference in how caregivers and their patients perceive patients' quality of life (QOL) after treatment completion. METHODS: Caregivers' and patients' perceptions of patient QOL were assessed using the University of Washington QOL Questionaire (UWQOL), a validated HNC-specific health-related QOL questionnaire. The survey is interpreted in terms of its two composite scores: a physical QOL score and a social-emotional QOL score with higher scores indicating better QOL. Caregiver anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Questionaire-7 (GAD-7) and caregiver depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionaire 8 (PHQ-8). Patients completed the UWQOL as part of clinic intake while caregivers were asked to complete the UWQOL for their patients in addition to the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in private. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between differences in caregivers' and patients' QOL scores (both social-emotional and physical QOL subscale scores) and GAD-7 and PHQ-8 scores. RESULTS: Of 47 caregivers recruited, 42.6% (n = 20) viewed patients' social-emotional QOL more negatively than patients themselves, while 31.9% viewed patients' physical QOL more negatively. After controlling for covariates, differences in perception of social-emotional QOL (p = .01) and differences in perception of physical QOL (p = .007) were significantly associated with caregiver depression, but not anxiety. Caregivers who disagreed with patients regarding patients' social-emotional QOL scored 6.80 points higher on the PHQ8 than agreeing caregivers. Caregivers who disagreed regarding patients' physical QOL scored 6.09 points higher. CONCLUSION: Caregivers commonly view patients' QOL more negatively than patients themselves. These caregivers tend to have greater psychosocial distress than caregivers who agree with their patients. Interventions designed to identify and aid at-risk caregivers are critically needed. We propose screening for differences in perception of patient QOL as a way of identifying distressed caregivers as well as provider-facilitated communication between patients and caregivers as possible interventions that should be examined in future research.

Association of Deficits Identified by Geriatric Assessment With Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Accumulation of geriatric deficits, leading to an increased frailty state, makes patients susceptible for decline in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Objective: To assess the association of single and accumulated geriatric deficits with HRQOL decline in patients after treatment for HNC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between October 2014 and May 2016, patients at a tertiary referral center were included in the Oncological Life Study (OncoLifeS), a prospective data biobank, and followed up for 2 years. A consecutive series of 369 patients with HNC underwent geriatric assessment at baseline; a cohort of 283 patients remained eligible for analysis, and after 2 years, 189 patients remained in the study. Analysis was performed between March and November 2020. Interventions or Exposures: Geriatric assessment included scoring of the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27, polypharmacy, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Timed Up & Go, Mini-Mental State Examination, 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, marital status, and living situation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QOL) scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Differences between patients were evaluated using linear mixed models at 3 months after treatment (main effects, ß [95% CI]) and declining course per year during follow-up (interaction × time, ß [95% CI]), adjusted for baseline GHS/QOL scores, and age, sex, stage, and treatment modality. Results: Among the 283 patients eligible for analysis, the mean (SD) age was 68.3 (10.9) years, and 193 (68.2%) were male. Severe comorbidity (ß = -7.00 [-12.43 to 1.56]), risk of malnutrition (ß = -6.18 [-11.55 to -0.81]), and IADL restrictions (ß = -10.48 [-16.39 to -4.57]) were associated with increased GHS/QOL decline at 3 months after treatment. Severe comorbidity (ß = -4.90 [-9.70 to -0.10]), IADL restrictions (ß = -5.36 [-10.50 to -0.22]), restricted mobility (ß = -6.78 [-12.81 to -0.75]), signs of depression (ß = -7.08 [-13.10 to -1.06]), and living with assistance or in a nursing home (ß = -8.74 [-15.75 to -1.73]) were associated with further GHS/QOL decline during follow-up. Accumulation of domains with geriatric deficits was a major significant factor for GHS/QOL decline at 3 months after treatment (per deficient domain ß = -3.17 [-5.04 to -1.30]) and deterioration during follow-up (per domain per year ß = -2.74 [-4.28 to -1.20]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study, geriatric deficits were significantly associated with HRQOL decline after treatment for HNC. Therefore, geriatric assessment may aid decision-making, indicate interventions, and reduce loss of HRQOL. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL7839.

Risk Factors for Sleep Disturbances in Patients Scheduled for Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Many patients with head-and-neck cancer are scheduled for irradiation. This study was performed to determine the frequency of and risk factors for pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 103 patients with head-and-neck cancer scheduled for radiotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Eighteen characteristics were evaluated including timing of start of radiotherapy relative to COVID-19 pandemic; age; gender; Karnofsky performance score; Charlson comorbidity index; history of another malignancy; family history of malignancy; distress score; number of emotional, physical or practical problems; request for psychological support; tumor site and stage; upfront surgery; planned chemotherapy; and brachytherapy boost. RESULTS: The frequency of pre-radiotherapy sleep disturbances was 42.7%. This was significantly associated with age ≤63 years (p=0.049), Karnofsky performance score ≤80 (p=0.002), Charlson comorbidity index ≥3 (p=0.005), history of another malignancy (p=0.012), emotional (p=0.001) or physical (p<0.001) problems, and request for psychological support (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Sleep disturbances were frequent in patients assigned to radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer. Recognizing risk factors for sleep disturbance helps identify patients requiring psychological support.