ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust was formed in February 2017 following an acquisition. The Library and Knowledge Services (LKS) merged while operating across two hospital sites. A priority for the merged Library and Knowledge Service was to integrate e-collections. A literature review identified six papers reporting health libraries that had merged and integrated e-collections. OBJECTIVES: A priority for the merged Library and Knowledge Service was to integrate e-collections. METHODS: To ensure equitable and cost-effective access to an extended collection, an audit of pre-existing e-collections was conducted. Electronic licence agreements enabling cross-site access were negotiated. A new OpenAthens ID was created. RESULTS: The integration of e-collections enabled Trust staff access to a greater number of e-journals and additional e-content, and an overall cost-saving was achieved. DISCUSSION: This case study supports existing literature stating that integrating collections increases the number of e-journals. It further identifies cost-difference in acquiring cross-site access to e-journals compared to databases providing full-text e-journals and additional e-content. CONCLUSION: Integrating e-collections enables equity of access and value. A national co-ordinated approach to procurement of e-collections will further support equity and best value throughout NHS LKS.
Subject(s)
Health Facility Merger/methods , Information Centers/trends , Libraries, Hospital/trends , Health Facility Merger/trends , Humans , Library Services/trends , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The rapid merger in a crisis of three GP practices to incorporate the patients from a neighbouring closing surgery, led to the redesign of primary care provision. A deliberate focus on patient safety and staff engagement was maintained throughout this challenging transition to working at scale in an innovative, integrated and collaborative GP model. METHOD: 3 cycles of a staff culture tool (Safety, Communication, Organizational Reliability, Physician & Employee burn-out and Engagement) were performed at intervals of 9-12 months with structured feedback and engagement with staff after each round. The impact of different styles of feedback, the effect of specific interventions, and overall changes in safety climate and culture domains were observed in detail throughout this time period. RESULTS: Strong themes demonstrated were that: there was a general improvement in all culture domains; specific focus on teams that expressed they were struggling created the most effective outcomes; an initial lack of trust of the management structure improved; adapting and tailoring the styles of feedback was most efficacious; and burn-out scores dropped progressively. A unique observation of the rate at which different modalities of safety climate and culture change with time is demonstrated. CONCLUSION: With limited time, resources and energy, especially at times of crisis or change, the rapid and accurate identification of which domains of 'culture' and which teams required the most input at each stage of the journey is invaluable. Using this tool and prioritising patient safety, enables rapid and effective positive change to the culture and shape of expanding practices. It affirms that new models of working at scale in GP can be positively embraced with improvements in safety culture, if this is deliberately focused on and included in the transition process.
Subject(s)
Health Facility Merger/methods , Safety Management/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , General Practice/methods , General Practice/standards , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Facility Merger/standards , Health Facility Merger/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Leadership , Organizational Culture , Safety Management/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In 2007, the Norwegian Parliament decided to merge the two largest health regions in the country: the South and East Health Regions became the South-East Health Region (SEHR). In its resolution, the Parliament formulated strong expectations for the merger: these included more effective hospital services in the Oslo metropolitan area, freeing personnel to work in other parts of the country, and making treatment of patients more coherent. The Parliamentary resolution provided no specific instructions regarding how this should be achieved. In order to fulfil these expectations, the new health region decided to develop a strategy as its tool for change; a change "agent". SINTEF was engaged to evaluate the process and its results. We studied the strategy design, the tools that emerged from the process, and which changes were induced by the strategy. The evaluation adopted a multimethod approach that combined interviews, document analysis and (re)analysis of existing data. The latter included economic data, performance data, and work environment data collected by the South-East Health Region itself. SINTEF found almost no effects, whether positive or negative. This article describes how the strategy was developed and discusses why it failed to meet the expectations formulated in the Parliamentary resolution.
Subject(s)
Health Facility Merger/economics , Health Facility Merger/organization & administration , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Facility Merger/methods , Humans , Norway , WorkforceABSTRACT
Since the 1990s, Germany has introduced a number of competitive elements into its public health care system. Sickness funds were given some freedom to sign selective contracts with providers. Competition between ambulatory care providers and hospitals was introduced for certain diseases and services. As competition has become more intense, the importance of competition law has increased. This paper reviews these areas of competition policy. The problems of introducing competition into a corporatist system are discussed. Based on the scientific evidence on the effects of competition, key lessons and implications for future policy are formulated.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Economic Competition , Health Policy , Contracts/legislation & jurisprudence , Disease Management , General Practitioners/economics , Germany , Government Regulation , Health Care Reform , Health Facility Merger/methods , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Humans , Insurance, Health/economicsABSTRACT
Today's nurse executive is likely to find himself or herself in the middle of a merger, acquisition, and/or partnership (MAP). This is the result of health care agencies vying for market share in the midst of stiff competition, as well as decreased reimbursement in a rapidly changing payment system. The phenomenon of MAPs is fueled by the focus on care coordination and population health management. To be prepared for the ongoing and increasing MAP activity, nurse executives need to develop the skill of risk taking as an essential competency for leading change. This article emphasizes the need to maintain and improve health care quality and patient safety.
Subject(s)
Health Facility Merger/methods , Nurse Administrators/psychology , Risk-Taking , Health Facility Merger/trends , HumansSubject(s)
Humans , Sickle Cell Trait/diagnosis , Sickle Cell Trait/epidemiology , Sickle Cell Trait/prevention & control , Thalassemia/diagnosis , Thalassemia/epidemiology , Thalassemia/prevention & control , Organizations, Nonprofit/standards , Health Facility Merger/methods , Biomedical Research/methodsSubject(s)
Humans , Health Facility Merger/methods , Biomedical Research/methods , Organizations, Nonprofit/standards , Sickle Cell Trait/diagnosis , Sickle Cell Trait/epidemiology , Sickle Cell Trait/prevention & control , Thalassemia/diagnosis , Thalassemia/epidemiology , Thalassemia/prevention & controlABSTRACT
This article describes the process of the merger of two mental health agencies with a primary care physical health provider to establish within the merged structure an integrated behavioral and physical health delivery system. The purpose of this article is to share our experience with those administrators and staff of agencies planning an integration initiative of behavioral and physical health services.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Health Facility Merger/methods , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Michigan , Models, Organizational , Organizational Case StudiesABSTRACT
A hybrid deal is an innovative type of joint venture between for-profit and not-for-profit entities designed for the purpose of improving healthcare delivery in a mutually accretive manner. Not-for-profit health systems, in particular, find hybrid deals attractive because these systems typically take a minority stake in the venture, requiring significantly less capital investment from not-for-profits than an outright acquisition. Hybrid deals allow not-for-profits to preserve capital for other needs while often maintaining some level of governance.
Subject(s)
Capital Financing/methods , Cooperative Behavior , Health Facility Merger/methods , Models, Organizational , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Hospitals, Voluntary , United StatesABSTRACT
Today, more than ever, the nation's independent community hospitals are facing the critical decision of whether to remain independent or to align with a strategic partner. Hospital leaders should keep in mind that successful consolidations require a common vision and shared values, and that the most competitive parties within a market are often the best partners for alignment. They should not allow competing interests of independent physicians to influence the outcome of such transactions. The senior finance leader's goal, in particular, should be to uncover potential issues early to avoid surprises surfacing during the due diligence process.
Subject(s)
Health Facility Merger/methods , Health Facility Merger/standards , United StatesSubject(s)
Health Facility Merger/methods , Leadership , Organizational Objectives , Humans , United KingdomSubject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Health Facility Merger/methods , Hospitals, Religious/organization & administration , Antitrust Laws , Financial Management, Hospital , Governing Board , Health Facility Merger/economics , Humans , Models, Organizational , Organizational Affiliation/economics , WisconsinABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated whether the integration of mental health into primary care overcomes ethnic disparities in access to and participation in mental health (MH) and substance abuse (SA) treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted site-specific analysis of a multisite clinical trial to compare participation of black and white elderly in an integrated model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at primary care clinics) versus an enhanced referral model of care (all MH/SA services are provided at specialized MH clinics). In all, 183 elderly (56% black) diagnosed with depression (82%), anxiety (32%), and/or problem drinking (22%) were randomized. RESULTS: Blacks in the integrated arm were significantly more likely to have at least one MH/SA visit (77.5%) relative to blacks in the enhanced referral arm (22%; adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 14.13; confidence interval [CI]: 4.76-41.95, Wald chi(2): 22.75, df = 1, p <0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between whites in the integrated treatment arm (66.6%) and whites in the enhanced referral arm (46.9%, adjusted OR: 2.98; CI: 0.98-9.06, Wald chi(2): 3.72, df = 1, p = 0.05). In the enhanced referral arm, blacks had a significantly smaller number of overall MH/SA visits (mean [SD]: 2.08 [5.28]) relative to whites (mean [SD]: 5.31 [7.76], adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR]: 2.87; CI: 1.06-7.73, Wald chi(2): 4.37, df = 1, p = 0.03). In the integrated arm, there was no statistically significant difference between blacks (mean [SD]: 3.22 [3.71]) and whites (mean [SD]: 2.75 [4.29], adjusted IRR: 0.58; CI: 0.25-1.33, Wald chi(2): 1.64, df = 1, p = 0.20). For both groups, time between baseline evaluation to first MH/SA visit was significantly shorter in the integrated treatment arm (for blacks: mean days [SD]: 31.06 [28.66]; for whites: mean days [SD]: 22.18 [33.88]) than in the enhanced referral arm (mean [SD]: 62.45 [43.53], adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 7.82; CI: 3.65-16.75, Wald chi(2): 28.02, df = 1, p <0.0001; mean [SD]: 63.46 [32.41], adjusted HR: 2.48; CI: 1.20-5.13, Wald chi(2): 6.02, df = 1, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: An integrated model of care is particularly effective in improving access to and participation in MH/SA treatment among black primary care patients.