Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 543
Filter
1.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 23(2): 81-88, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768050

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We sought to characterize adaptive changes to the revised United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation policy and estimate long-term survival trends for heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: Patients listed for HTx between October 17, 2013 and September 30, 2021 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, and stratified into pre- and postpolicy revision groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine trends in device utilization for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), microaxial support (Impella), and no mechanical circulatory support (non-MCS). Survival data post-HTx were fitted to parametric distributions and extrapolated to 5 years. RESULTS: We identified 27,523 HTx waitlist candidates during the study period, most of whom (n = 16,376) were waitlisted in the prepolicy change period. Overall, 19,554 patients underwent HTx during the study period (pre: 12,037 and post: 7517). Listings increased after the policy change for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients. Listings for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients decreased. HTx increased for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients after the policy change and decreased for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients. Waitlist survival increased for the overall ( P < 0.01), ECMO ( P < 0.01), IABP ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) groups. Waitlist survival did not differ for the LVAD ( P = 0.8) and Impella ( P = 0.1) groups. Post-transplant survival decreased for the overall ( P < 0.01), LVAD ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) populations. CONCLUSIONS: Allocation policy revisions have contributed to greater utilization of ECMO, Impella, and IABP, decreased utilization of LVADs and non-MCS, increased waitlist survival, and decreased post-HTx survival.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Heart Transplantation , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Waiting Lists , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists/mortality , Adult , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Survival Rate/trends , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data
2.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 26(5): 278-282, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736341

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term support with a HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has improved outcomes of patients with end-stage heart failure. However, there is a paucity of data on the outcomes of patients who underwent concomitant cardiac surgical procedure (CCSP) during HM3-LVAD implantation. OBJECTIVES: To assess our single-center experience with patients who underwent CCSP during the implantation of an HM3-LVAD. METHODS: From December 2016 until April 2022, 131 adult patients underwent HM3-LVAD implantation. A total of 23 patients underwent CCSP during the HM3-LVAD implantation+CCSP, and 108 underwent only HM3-LVAD implantation (HM3-only). RESULTS: The median age was 59 ± 11 years (range 54-67), 82% (n=108) were male, and 76% (n=100) were implanted as a bridge-to-transplant. The concomitant procedures performed during the implantation included 8 aortic valve repairs/replacements, 14 tricuspid valve repairs, 4 patent foramen ovales or atrial septal defect closures, and 3 other cardiac procedures. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 113 ± 58 minutes for the HM3-only group and 155 ± 47 minutes for the HM3+CCSP group (P = 0.007). The mortality rates at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-implantation were 2 (9%), 5 (22%), and 6 (26%) respectively for the HM3+CCSP group, and 7 (6%), 18 (17%), and 30 (28%) for the HM3-only group (P = 0.658, 0.554, and 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrated no significant difference in the 30-day, 6-month, and 12-month mortality rates for patients who underwent a CCSP during HM3-LVAD implantation compared to patients who did not undergo CCSP during HM3-LVAD implantation.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Prosthesis Implantation/methods
3.
Heart Lung ; 66: 56-70, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the clinical management of patients with heart failure. Further research is warranted on the relationship between SDOH and Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) therapy for heart failure. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the state of knowledge on the intersection of SDOH with VAD therapy. METHODS: Guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, this literature search captured three concepts of interest including VAD therapy, SDOH, and their domains of intersection with patient selection, decision-making, treatment outcome, and resource allocation. CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed publications in English, published between 2006 and 2023, conducted in the United States, and examined VAD therapy in the context of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). RESULTS: 22 quantitative studies meeting the inclusion criteria informed the conceptualization of SDOH using the Healthy People 2030 framework. Four themes captured how the identified SDOH intersected with different processes relating to VAD therapy: patient decision-making, healthcare access and resource allocation, patient selection, and treatment outcomes. Most studies addressed the intersection of SDOH with healthcare access and treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: This review highlights substantial gaps in understanding how SDOH intersect with patient and patient selection for VAD. More research using mixed methods designs is warranted. On an institutional level, addressing bias and discrimination may have mitigated health disparities with treatment outcomes, but further research is needed for implementing system-wide change. Standardized assessment of SDOH is recommended throughout clinical practice from patient selection to outpatient VAD care.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/therapy , Patient Selection
5.
Rev. esp. cardiol. (Ed. impr.) ; 76(4): 227-237, abr. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-218346

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos Se presentan las características clínicas, los resultados y las complicaciones de todos los pacientes a los que se implantó un dispositivo de asistencia circulatoria mecánica de larga duración en España entre 2007 y 2020. Métodos Análisis a partir del Registro español de asistencia ventricular de larga duración (REGALAD) en el que participaron los centros españoles con programa de asistencia ventricular mecánica. Resultado En este periodo se implantaron 263 dispositivos de asistencia ventricular de larga duración en 22 hospitales. En 182 pacientes (69%) la asistencia fue ventricular izquierda de flujo continuo; en 79 (30%), de flujo pulsátil (58 izquierdas y 21 biventriculares), y en 2 (1%) se implantó un corazón artificial total. El objetivo de la asistencia fue el puente al trasplante en 78 pacientes (30%), puente a la candidatura en 110 (42%), puente a la recuperación en 3 (1%) y la terapia de destino en 72 (27%). La supervivencia total a 6, 12 y 24 meses fue del 79, el 74 y el 69% respectivamente, y la mejor se consiguió con las asistencias izquierdas de flujo continuo (el 84, el 80 y el 75%). Las principales complicaciones asociadas fueron: infecciones (el 37% de los pacientes), hemorragias (35%), neurológicas (29%) y disfunción de la asistencia (17%). Conclusiones Las asistencias ventriculares de larga duración han irrumpido en España como un tratamiento útil en la insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada. Como en otros registros internacionales, se tiende a utilizar dispositivos izquierdos intracorpóreos de flujo continuo, que se asocian con mejores resultados. Las complicaciones relacionadas siguen siendo frecuentes y graves (AU)


Introduction and objectives This report presents the clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications of all consecutive patients implanted with a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in Spain between 2007 and 2020. Methods Analysis of the Spanish Registry of durable ventricular assist devices (REGALAD) including data form Spanish centers with a mechanical circulatory support program. Results During the study period, 263 ventricular assist devices were implanted in 22 hospitals. The implanted device was an isolated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in 182 patients (69%), a pulsatile-flow device (58 isolated left ventricular and 21 biventricular) in 79 (30%), and a total artificial heart in 2 patients (1%). The strategy of the implant was as bridge to heart transplant in 78 patients (30%), bridge to candidacy in 110 (42%), bridge to recovery in 3 (1%) and destination therapy in 72 patients (27%). Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 79%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and was better in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (84%, 80%, and 75%). The main adverse events related to this therapy were infections (37% of patients), bleeding (35%), neurological (29%), and device malfunction (17%). Conclusions Durable ventricular assist devices have emerged in Spain in the last few years as a useful therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. As in other international registries, the current trend is to use continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular devices, which are associated with better results. Adverse events continue to be frequent and severe (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Video Recording , Treatment Outcome , Records , Spain
6.
JAMA ; 327(5): 442-453, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103766

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The optimal approach to the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during cardiogenic shock is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early use of moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C) compared with strict normothermia (36-37 °C) improves mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving venoarterial ECMO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial of patients (who were eligible if they had been endotracheally intubated and were receiving venoarterial ECMO for cardiogenic shock for <6 hours) conducted in the intensive care units at 20 French cardiac shock care centers between October 2016 and July 2019. Of 786 eligible patients, 374 were randomized. Final follow-up occurred in November 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Early moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C; n = 168) for 24 hours or strict normothermia (36-37 °C; n = 166). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days. There were 31 secondary outcomes including mortality at days 7, 60, and 180; a composite outcome of death, heart transplant, escalation to left ventricular assist device implantation, or stroke at days 30, 60, and 180; and days without requiring a ventilator or kidney replacement therapy at days 30, 60, and 180. Adverse events included rates of severe bleeding, sepsis, and number of units of packed red blood cells transfused during venoarterial ECMO. RESULTS: Among the 374 patients who were randomized, 334 completed the trial (mean age, 58 [SD, 12] years; 24% women) and were included in the primary analysis. At 30 days, 71 patients (42%) in the moderate hypothermia group had died vs 84 patients (51%) in the normothermia group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.13], P = .15; risk difference, -8.3% [95% CI, -16.3% to -0.3%]). For the composite outcome of death, heart transplant, escalation to left ventricular assist device implantation, or stroke at day 30, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96; P = .03) for the moderate hypothermia group compared with the normothermia group and the risk difference was -11.5% (95% CI, -23.2% to 0.2%). Of the 31 secondary outcomes, 30 were inconclusive. The incidence of moderate or severe bleeding was 41% in the moderate hypothermia group vs 42% in the normothermia group. The incidence of infections was 52% in both groups. The incidence of bacteremia was 20% in the moderate hypothermia group vs 30% in the normothermia group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial involving patients with refractory cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial ECMO, early application of moderate hypothermia for 24 hours did not significantly increase survival compared with normothermia. However, because the 95% CI was wide and included a potentially important effect size, these findings should be considered inconclusive. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02754193.


Subject(s)
Body Temperature , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Hypothermia, Induced/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Confidence Intervals , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Female , France , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Replacement Therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Sepsis/epidemiology , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/mortality , Time Factors
7.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 163(1): 124-134.e8, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012541

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been shown to increase allosensitization before orthotopic heart transplantation, but the influence of LVAD support on posttransplant rejection is controversial. This study examines the postoperative incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in patients bridged with continuous flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) relative to primary transplant (Primary Tx). METHODS: All patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution between July 2006 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 395). Patients were classified into Primary Tx (n = 145) and CF-LVAD (n = 207) groups. Propensity score matching on 13 covariates implemented a 0.1 caliper logistic model with nearest neighbor 1:1 matching. Development of moderate to severe (ie, 2R/3R) rejection was evaluated using a competing risks model. Potential predictors of 2R/3R ACR were evaluated using Fine-Gray regression on the marginal subdistribution hazard. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 122 patients in each group (n = 244). At 12 and 24 months, the cumulative incidence of 2R/3R ACR was 17% and 23% for the CF-LVAD group and 26% and 31%, respectively, for the Primary Tx group (P = .170). CF-LVAD was not predictive of 2R/3R rejection on multivariable Fine-Gray regression (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.33; P = .301). There was no difference in the 5-year incidence of antibody mediated rejection (10% [n = 12] vs 9% [n = 11]; P = .827). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for covariates, CF-LVAD was not associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe ACR during the 24 months after cardiac transplantation. Further investigation is warranted with larger cohorts, but CF-LVAD may have minimal influence on posttransplant ACR.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Long Term Adverse Effects , Preoperative Care , Risk Assessment , Antibodies/blood , Female , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Heart Transplantation/methods , Humans , Incidence , Long Term Adverse Effects/diagnosis , Long Term Adverse Effects/epidemiology , Long Term Adverse Effects/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care/instrumentation , Preoperative Care/methods , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , United States
8.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 163(1): 140-147.e4, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years. RESULTS: Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.


Subject(s)
Assisted Circulation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Graft Rejection/mortality , Heart Transplantation , Multiple Organ Failure , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Preoperative Care , Assisted Circulation/instrumentation , Assisted Circulation/methods , Assisted Circulation/statistics & numerical data , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Transplantation/methods , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Assist Devices/classification , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Preoperative Care/instrumentation , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , United States , Waiting Lists
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 165: 88-94, 2022 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34893302

ABSTRACT

Elevated central venous pressure in those with Fontan circulation causes liver congestion and hepatomegaly. We assessed if liver volume by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Retrospective study of 122 patients with Fontan circulation who were >10 years old and had a liver MRI with magnetic resonance elastography. Liver volume (ml) was measured by manual segmentation from axial T2-weighted images and was indexed to body surface area. The composite outcome included death, heart transplant, ventricular assist device placement, or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization. The median age at the time of MRI was 18.9 (interquartile range 15.8 to 25.9) years, and 47% of the patients were women. The mean indexed liver volume was 1,133 ± 180 ml/m2. Indexed liver volume was not significantly associated with age, years since Fontan, or with liver stiffness (r = 0.15, p = 0.10), but was positively correlated with Fontan pressure (r = 0.32, p = 0.002). Over a median follow-up of 2.1 (0.8 to 4.2) years, 32 patients (26%) experienced the composite outcome. Higher indexed liver volume was associated with a greater hazard for the composite outcome (hazard ratio per 1 SD increase = 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.35, p = 0.0004) but increased liver stiffness was not significantly associated with the composite outcome (hazard ratio per 1 SD increase 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 2.21, p = 0.11). In conclusion, greater liver volume indexed to body surface area is associated with unfavorable hemodynamics and adverse outcomes in patients with Fontan circulation. Liver volume may be a useful, simple imaging biomarker in adolescents and adults with Fontan circulation.


Subject(s)
Fontan Procedure , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hepatomegaly/epidemiology , Liver/pathology , Mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Central Venous Pressure , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Female , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hepatomegaly/diagnostic imaging , Hospitalization , Humans , Liver/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Organ Size , Proportional Hazards Models , Young Adult
10.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 112(6): 1763-1774, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34648810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs). METHODS: From September 19, 2012, to December 31, 2020, 1229 devices in 1011 patients were reported to the registry from 47 North American Hospitals in patients aged younger than 19 years. RESULTS: Cardiomyopathy was the most common underlying etiology (58%), followed by congenital heart disease (CHD; 25%) and myocarditis (10%). The most common devices implanted were implantable continuous (IC; 419 [41%]), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP; 269 [27%]), paracorporeal continuous (PC; 263 [26%]), and percutaneous (53 [5%]). Overall, at 6 months after VAD implantation, 83% had a positive outcome (transplant, explant, or alive on device). The freedom from stroke at 3 months was highest in IC VADs (93%), compared with PP VADs (84%) and with PC VADs (75%). There were differences in survival by device type, with patients on IC VADs having the best overall survival and those on PC having the lowest overall survival, though the patient populations being supported by each VAD type differed significantly from each other. CONCLUSIONS: This Fifth Pedimacs Report demonstrates the continued robust growth of VADs in the pediatric community, now with more than 1000 patients reported to the registry. The multiple available device types (PC, PP, IC) serve different populations with different pre-VAD risk profiles, which may account for differences in survival and adverse events between device types.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , United States
11.
Physiol Rep ; 9(20): e15084, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34676674

ABSTRACT

An emerging therapeutic modality, ECPELLA, which combines a transvalvular microaxial left ventricular (LV) assist device, Impella, and venoarterial membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), has been applied for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. During ECPELLA support, VA-ECMO increases the LV load, whereas the Impella reduces the LV load. Studies reported that coronary perfusion is influenced by LV unloading conditions, and the effective degree of LV unloading to increase the coronary perfusion on ECPELLA support remains to be determined. Here, we reported a cardiogenic shock case whose coronary arterial flow was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography during ECPELLA support. The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) peak blood flow velocity and the velocity time integral (VTI) were not significantly increased when blood was ejected from the LV (partial LV unloading). When the LV blood ejection was completely bypassed by Impella confirmed by non-pulsatile aortic pressure with significantly reduced LV pressure with no aortic valve opening (LV uncoupling: no blood ejection from the LV), both peak velocity and VTI of the LAD were markedly increased and the blood flow became continuous throughout the cardiac cycle. Our case suggests that the coronary arterial flow in the injured myocardium is sensitive to degrees of LV unloading on ECPELLA support.


Subject(s)
Coronary Vessels/physiology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
12.
Circ Heart Fail ; 14(11): e008527, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706550

ABSTRACT

Trials on intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use in cardiogenic shock related to acute myocardial infarction have shown disappointing results. The role of IABP in cardiogenic shock treatment remains unclear, and new (potentially more potent) mechanical circulatory supports with arguably larger device profile are emerging. A reappraisal of the physiological premises of intra-aortic counterpulsation may underpin the rationale to maintain IABP as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with acute decompensated heart failure and tissue hypoperfusion. Several pathophysiological features differ between myocardial infarction- and acute decompensated heart failure-related hypoperfusion, encompassing cardiogenic shock severity, filling status, systemic vascular resistances rise, and adaptation to chronic (if preexisting) left ventricular dysfunction. IABP combines a more substantial effect on left ventricular afterload with a modest increase in cardiac output and would therefore be most suitable in clinical scenarios characterized by a disproportionate increase in afterload without profound hemodynamic compromise. The acute decompensated heart failure syndrome is characterized by exquisite afterload-sensitivity of cardiac output and may be an ideal setting for counterpulsation. Several hemodynamic variables have been shown to predict response to IABP within this scenario, potentially guiding appropriate patient selection. Finally, acute decompensated heart failure with hypoperfusion may frequently represent an end stage in the heart failure history: IABP may provide sufficient hemodynamic support and prompt end-organ function recovery in view of more definitive heart replacement therapies while preserving ambulation when used with a transaxillary approach.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics/physiology , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology
13.
Physiol Res ; 70(6): 831-839, 2021 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34717062

ABSTRACT

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an established therapeutic option for advanced heart failure. Most of the currently used LVADs generate a continuous stream of blood that decreases arterial pulse pressure. This study investigated whether a change of the pulse pressure during different pump speed settings would affect cerebral autoregulation and thereby affect cerebral blood flow (CBF). The study included 21 haemodynamically stable outpatients with a continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate II, Abbott, USA) implanted a median of 6 months before the study (interquartile range 3 to 14 months). Arterial blood pressure (measured by finger plethysmography) was recorded simultaneously with CBF (measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound) during baseline pump speed (8900 rpm [IQR 8800; 9200]) and during minimum and maximum tolerated pump speeds (8000 rpm [IQR 8000; 8200] and 9800 rpm [IQR 9800; 10 000]). An increase in LVAD pump speed by 800 rpm [IQR 800; 1000] from the baseline lead to a significant decrease in arterial pulse pressure and cerebral blood flow pulsatility (relative change ?24% and ?32%, both p < 0.01), but it did not affect mean arterial pressure and mean CBF velocity (relative change 1% and ?1.7%, p = 0.1 and 0.7). In stable patients with a continuous-flow LVAD, changes of pump speed settings within a clinically used range did not impair static cerebral autoregulation and cerebral blood flow.


Subject(s)
Cerebrovascular Circulation , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
14.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19196, 2021 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34584108

ABSTRACT

The association between ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and mortality in patients supported by continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) remains controversial. To evaluate the association between pre-implantation, early (≤ 30 day) post-implantation VAs and mortality in bridge to transplant (BTT) and destination therapy (DT) LVAD patients, separately. The risk factors for post LVAD VAs were also investigated. In this observational cohort study, we included 341 patients who received a first time, continuous flow LVAD between January 1st 2010 and July 30th 2018. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable cox regression analyses to study the association between VAs and mortality in the BTT and DT populations. The mean age of the cohort was 58 ± 14 years, with 82% males, 53% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 45% were DT. The mean follow-up was 2.2 ± 2.1 years. In both BTT and DT cohorts, pre LVAD VAs were not associated with mortality after LVAD implantation (log-rank p = 0.95 and p = 0.089, respectively). In the BTT population, early post-LVAD VAs were not statistically associated with increased mortality (log rank p = 0.072). In the DT patients, early post LVAD VAs were associated with a 67% increase in the hazards rate of mortality on LVAD support (HR 1.67 [1.05-2.65], p = 0.029). The final model was adjusted for type of cardiomyopathy, INTERMACS profile, glomerular filtration rate, post LVAD atrial fibrillation, age and cerebrovascular events. Early post-LVAD VA is common after LVAD implantation and is an independent predictor of mortality in the DT LVAD population.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Transplantation/methods , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 78(9): 883-894, 2021 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34446160

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are ill-defined in elderly patients, and with new-generation devices. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life after LVAD in contemporary practice. METHODS: Adults receiving durable LVADs between January 1, 2010, and March 1, 2020, were identified from the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) database. The primary outcome was adjusted survival; secondary outcomes included quality of life rated using a visual analogue scale (where 0 represents "worst health" and 100 "best health"); 6-minute walk distance; stroke; device malfunction; and rehospitalization, stratified by patient age. Median follow-up was 15 months (IQR: 6-32 months). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 68.9% (n = 16,808) patients aged <65 years, 26.3% (n = 6,418) patients aged 65-75 years, and 4.8% (n = 1,182) patients aged >75 years, who were predominantly male (n = 19,119, 78%) and on destination therapy (n = 12,425, 51%). Competing outcomes analysis demonstrated mortality (70% CIs) of 34% (33%-34%), 54% (54%-55%), and 66% (64%-68%) for patients aged <65, 65-75, and >75 years, respectively, which improved during the study in patients aged >75 years. Newer-generation devices were associated with reduced late mortality (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.25-0.49). Stroke, device malfunction or thrombosis, and rehospitalizations decreased with increasing age (all P < 0.01). Median 6-minute walk distance increased from 0 feet (IQR: 0-665 feet) to 1,065 feet (IQR: 642-1,313 feet) (P < 0.001), and quality of life improved from 40 (IQR: 15-60) to 75 (IQR: 60-90) (P < 0.001) after LVAD in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients, LVADs are associated with increased functional capacity, similar improvements in quality of life, and fewer complications compared with younger patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Heart-Assist Devices , Quality of Life , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/classification , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Physical Functional Performance , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Prosthesis Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/psychology , Walk Test/methods , Walk Test/statistics & numerical data
16.
ASAIO J ; 67(9): 973-981, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403376

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) radically modified the organization of healthcare systems with shutdown of routine activities and outpatient clinics. Herein, we report our institutional experience with a Telemonitoring and Care Program (TC-Program) to monitor and support left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients during COVID-19 outbreak. This single-arm cohort study analyzed 156 patients who entered the TC-Program at our institution between April and August 2020. The TC-Program was based on routine phone calls to patients and a 24/7 emergency line. In November 2020, patients were asked for feedback on the TC-Program and checked for survival, transplant, or explant. The primary endpoint was the rate of TC-Program-driven interventions. Patients (males: 82.8%) were 61 years old (interquartile range [IQR]: 53.0-67.5) and on LVAD support for 1,266 days (IQR: 475-2,211). Patients were included in the TC-Program for a median time of 99 days (min:15, max:120) and received a median number of six phone calls (min:1, max:14). Twenty-three patients (14.7%) were referred for clinical evaluation after phone contact. Two patients (1.27%) were diagnosed with COVID-19: one of them died after intensive care, and one remained paucisymptomatic and recovered. Three patients asked to exit the program considering it not useful while the others gave high rates in terms of usefulness (median: 9, IQR: 8-10), information (median: 9, IQR: 8-10), good medical care (median: 9, IQR: 8-10), and psychologic support (median: 8, IQR: 7-10). A TC-Program based on the four ICSA principles (Inform, Care, Support, and Adapt) is feasible in LVAD patients and can be rapidly implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/organization & administration , Telemedicine , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 153: 79-85, 2021 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183146

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a risk factor for heart failure (HF), but its presence among HF patients may be associated with favorable outcomes. We investigated the long-term outcomes across different body mass index (BMI) groups, after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and whether defibrillator back-up (CRT-D) confers survival benefit. One thousand two-hundred seventy-seven (1,277) consecutive patients (mean age: 67.0 ± 12.7 years, 44.1% women, and mean BMI: 28.3 ± 5.6 Kg/m2) who underwent CRT implantation in 5 centers between 2000-2014 were followed-up for a median period of 4.9 years (IQR 2.4 to 7.5). More than 10% of patients had follow-up for ≥10 years. Patients were classified according to BMI as normal: <25.0 Kg/m2, overweight: 25.0 to 29.9 Kg/m2 and obese: ≥30.0 Kg/m2. 364 patients had normal weight, 494 were overweight and 419 were obese. CRT-Ds were implanted in >75% of patients, but were used less frequently in obese individuals. The composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or cardiac transplant/left ventricular assist device (LVAD) occurred in 50.9% of patients. At 10-year follow-up, less than a quarter of patients in the lowest and highest BMI categories were still alive and free from heart transplant/LVAD. After adjustment BMI of 25 to 29.9 Kg/m2 (HR = 0.73 [95%CI 0.56 to 0.96], p = 0.023) and use of CRT-D (HR = 0.74 [95% CI 0.55 to 0.98], p = 0.039) were independent predictors of survival free from LVAD/heart transplant. BMI of 25 to 29.9 Kg/m2 at the time of implant was independently associated with favourable long-term 10-year survival. Use of CRT-D was associated with improved survival irrespective of BMI class.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Mortality , Obesity/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Defibrillators, Implantable/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Overweight/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
18.
Am Heart J ; 238: 66-74, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical features and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS) treated in the early experience with Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device and patients treated recently. BACKGROUND: Since pre-market approval (PMA) of Impella device as treatment for AMICS, use of the device has grown considerably. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 649 AMICS patients treated with perioperative Impella, with 291 patients treated from 2008 to 2014 comprising the early experience cohort and 358 patients treated from 2017 to 2019 comprising the recent experience cohort. The primary end point was risk adjusted in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Mean age and gender distribution of patients was similar in the two cohorts. The recent cohort had more invasive hemodynamic monitoring (64% vs 46%; P < .001) and less use of an intra-aortic balloon pump prior to Impella (15% vs 41%; P < .001). Recently treated patients were significantly more likely to receive Impella support prior to PCI (58% vs 44%; P = .005). In-hospital mortality was lower in the recent cohort (48% vs 56%; P = .043). This difference was however no longer significant after risk adjustment (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59-1.34, P = .59). Rates of acute kidney injury, major bleeding, and vascular complications requiring surgery were also significantly lower in the recent cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Impella for AMICS during recent years is associated with lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality, which may reflect better patient selection, earlier device implantation, and improved management algorithms. In-depth understanding of these factors may inform the development of future treatment protocols.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Hemodynamic Monitoring , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Odds Ratio , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/complications , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/complications , Vascular Diseases/surgery
19.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 26(5): 473-479, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33844604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of robust data evaluating outcomes of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare HVAD recipients that received therapeutic enoxaparin as "bridge" therapy to describe bleeding and thrombotic events and compare outcomes between devices. The primary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding within 30 days of "bridge" episode. Major bleeding was defined by INTERMACS criteria. RESULTS: We evaluated 257 "bridge" episodes in 54 patients, 35 with a HM II device and 19 with an HVAD device that underwent 176 and 81 bridging episodes, respectively. The median INR prior to "bridge" was lower in the HM II group compared to the HVAD group (1.5 vs 1.7, P < .01), however, there was no difference in the median duration of "bridge" therapy (7 vs 7 days, P = .42). There were a total of 30 (12%) bleeding episodes, with the majority in the HM II group vs HVAD (26 [15%] vs 4 [5%], P = .02). We observed 3 (1%) thromboembolic events in 2 (4%) patients with an HVAD device. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a HM II device was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: We found the use of enoxaparin "bridge" therapy to be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding in patients with a HM II device compared with an HVAD device. Assessment of device- and patient-specific factors should be evaluated to minimize bleeding events.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Ventricles , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
20.
Circ Heart Fail ; 14(4): e007957, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to afflict millions of people worldwide. Patients with end-stage heart failure and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may be at risk for severe COVID-19 given a high prevalence of complex comorbidities and functional impaired immunity. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with end-stage heart failure and durable LVADs. METHODS: The Trans-CoV-VAD registry is a multi-center registry of LVAD and cardiac transplant patients in the United States with confirmed COVID-19. Patient characteristics, exposure history, presentation, laboratory data, course, and clinical outcomes were collected by participating institutions and reviewed by a central data repository. This report represents the participation of the first 9 centers to report LVAD data into the registry. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in this cohort. The median age was 56 years (interquartile range, 46-68), 14 (35%) were women, and 21 (52%) were Black. Among the most common presenting symptoms were cough (41%), fever, and fatigue (both 38%). A total of 18% were asymptomatic at diagnosis. Only 43% of the patients reported either subjective or measured fever during the entire course of illness. Over half (60%) required hospitalization, and 8 patients (20%) died, often after lengthy hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: We present the largest case series of LVAD patients with COVID-19 to date. Understanding these characteristics is essential in an effort to improve the outcome of this complex patient population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices , Pandemics , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Ventricles , Heart-Assist Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...