Haemophilic arthropathy: Diagnosis, management, and aging patient considerations.

Gene therapy and universal use of safer, more effective, and personalised prophylactic regimens (factor, and nonfactor) are expected to prevent joint bleeding and promote joint health in persons with haemophilia (PwH). Growing evidence suggests that subclinical bleeding, with active and inactive synovial proliferation, continues and haemophilic arthropathy remains a major morbidity in PwH despite early institution of joint prophylaxis. Joint health assessment is evolving with physical examination scores complementing imaging scores. Point-of-care ultrasound is emerging as a safe, cost-effective, and readily available tool for acute determination of musculoskeletal abnormalities, serial evaluation of joints for sonographic markers of haemophilic arthropathy, and in providing objective insight into the efficacy of new therapies. In acute haemarthrosis, arthrocentesis expedites recovery and prevent the vicious cycle of bleed-synovitis-rebleed. When synovial proliferation develops, a multidisciplinary team approach is critical with haematology, orthopaedics, and physiotherapy involvement. Synovectomy is considered for patients with chronic synovitis that fail conservative management. Non-surgical and minimally invasive procedures should always be offered and considered first. Careful patient selection, screening and early intervention increase the success of these interventions in reducing bleeding, pain, and improving joint function and quality of life. Chemical synovectomy is practical in developing countries, but radioactive synovectomy appears to be more effective. When surgical synovectomy is considered, arthroscopic/minimally invasive approach should be attempted first. In advanced haemophilic arthropathy, joint replacement and arthrodesis can be considered. While excited about the future of haemophilia management, navigating musculoskeletal challenges in the aging haemophilia population is equally important.

Artificial intelligence for detection of effusion and lipo-hemarthrosis in X-rays and CT of the knee.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic knee injuries are challenging to diagnose accurately through radiography and to a lesser extent, through CT, with fractures sometimes overlooked. Ancillary signs like joint effusion or lipo-hemarthrosis are indicative of fractures, suggesting the need for further imaging. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can automate image analysis, improving diagnostic accuracy and help prioritizing clinically important X-ray or CT studies. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate an AI algorithm for detecting effusion of any kind in knee X-rays and selected CT images and distinguishing between simple effusion and lipo-hemarthrosis indicative of intra-articular fractures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed post traumatic knee imaging from January 2016 to February 2023, categorizing images into lipo-hemarthrosis, simple effusion, or normal. It utilized the FishNet-150 algorithm for image classification, with class activation maps highlighting decision-influential regions. The AI's diagnostic accuracy was validated against a gold standard, based on the evaluations made by a radiologist with at least four years of experience. RESULTS: Analysis included CT images from 515 patients and X-rays from 637 post traumatic patients, identifying lipo-hemarthrosis, simple effusion, and normal findings. The AI showed an AUC of 0.81 for detecting any effusion, 0.78 for simple effusion, and 0.83 for lipo-hemarthrosis in X-rays; and 0.89, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively, in CTs. CONCLUSION: The AI algorithm effectively detects knee effusion and differentiates between simple effusion and lipo-hemarthrosis in post-traumatic patients for both X-rays and selected CT images further studies are needed to validate these results.

Predicting joint involvement through tailored prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A, is it possible?

INTRODUCTION: Tailored prophylaxis is the current treatment regimen for patients with severe haemophilia A. Recently, published guidelines describe two possible approaches, based on clinical characteristics or estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters. However, both have strengths and weaknesses, and their characteristics need to be integrated to optimize treatment appropriately. In this paper, we present a model that considers together the characteristics of prophylaxis and the relevance of each. METHODS: The age at initiation of prophylaxis, number of bleeding events, treatment regimen, therapeutic adherence, FVIII trough levels, and joint status were analyzed in 59 patients followed at La Paz University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2019. RESULTS: The mean duration of primary prophylaxis of 113.37 ± 57.79 months. Eighty-three percent (n = 49) had no joint status involvement at the end of follow-up (HJHS and HEAD-US = 0). The median ABR was 0.7 (IQR 0.2 -1.0) and 54.2% presented trough levels of FVIII during follow-up >1 IU/dL. 72,9% engaged in some type of physical activity and overall adherence was over 85% in all patients evaluated. The regression analysis performed, considering all these factors, showed that the initiation of prophylaxis before 21 months of age was the most relevant protective factor against the appearance of joint involvement (OR 88.33 p.031 CI 95% 1.49-5224.40) CONCLUSION: Early initiation of prophylaxis was the most relevant factor in the protection of joint status. More comprehensive analysis models adapted to the characteristics of each population, are needed to adequately individualize treatment.

Primary prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint outcomes in Swedish haemophilia A patients.

INTRODUCTION: Primary prophylaxis is the gold standard in severe haemophilia A (SHA) but time to escalate the prophylaxis regimen varies. AIM: Assess prophylaxis implementation and long-term joint health outcomes in SHA with primary prophylaxis. METHODS: Adult male patients born after 1980, with SHA on primary prophylaxis, started before the age of 3 years and second joint bleed, and no history of FVIII inhibitors, were enrolled. Repeated joint-health examinations were performed with HJHS or HEAD-US; VERITAS-PRO assessed adherence. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled with, at inclusion, median age 33.5 years, annualized bleed rate and joint bleed rate 0, and FVIII consumption 4232 IU/kg/year, respectively. The median age was 1.2 years, at prophylaxis start once weekly with a median FVIII dose of 47.7 IU/kg, and 1.7 years, by the time escalation to a final regimen had occurred, with a median infusion frequency of thrice weekly and FVIII dose 41.7 IU/kg, respectively. Older age correlated with later transition to escalated prophylaxis (p < .001). Longer time to escalated prophylaxis correlated to more bleeds (p < .001). Median HJHS increased slowly, reaching 4 at 35-40 years. HJHS at 15-20 years correlated with higher HJHS afterwards. Median total HEAD-US score was 1 and correlated with HJHS (p < .001). Median VERITAS-PRO score was 36, indicating good treatment adherence. CONCLUSION: Primary prophylaxis is effective but does not completely prevent the gradual development of arthropathy in SHA. Joint assessments with HJHS should start at an early age, as they correlate with arthropathy in later life. Prophylaxis escalation should proceed expeditiously to prevent bleeds.

Predictive parameters for spontaneous joint bleeding during emicizumab prophylaxis.

ABSTRACT: Emicizumab is approved for prophylaxis of patients with hemophilia A (HA). Despite its efficacy in reducing bleeding, some patients on emicizumab still experience hemarthrosis, but no tool is yet available to identify those at a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate whether laboratory measurements (global coagulation assays and emicizumab concentration) and/or arthropathy scores can distinguish patients at higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding while on emicizumab prophylaxis. A thrombin generation assay was performed upon the addition of tissue factor and synthetic phospholipids. Nonactivated thromboelastography was performed on citrated whole blood. Emicizumab concentrations were measured using a modified 1-stage factor VIII assay. The degree of hemophilic arthropathy was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score and Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) score. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between variables and bleeding. The predictive power of these variables was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Forty patients with severe HA, with or without inhibitors, on emicizumab prophylaxis were enrolled in an observational cohort study. Ten of 40 developed spontaneous joint bleeding. None of the laboratory parameters were able to distinguish patients with a higher risk of spontaneous joint bleeding. ROC analysis showed that during emicizumab prophylaxis, only the presence of synovitis and a higher HEAD-US score were associated with spontaneous joint bleeding (area under the curve, 0.84). A greater degree of arthropathy and the presence of synovitis could help predict the risk of spontaneous joint bleeding in patients with HA on emicizumab prophylaxis.

Stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1alfa) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP): Two potential signature biomarkers of radiological detectable hemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a rare constitutional bleeding disorder due to a deficiency in Factor VIII or Factor IX. Recurrent hemarthroses, one of the major complications of the disease, lead to hemophilic arthropathy, a disabling condition that requires early diagnosis. Traditionally, clinical examination and plain film radiography have been used to diagnose hemophilic arthropathy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound can be more useful for diagnosing soft-tissue changes. However, but each of these methods has limitations and diagnosis of arthropathy can be delayed. AIM: The aim of this project was to assess plasmatic biomolecules indicative of osteo-cartilaginous damage in patients with hemophilia with or without known arthropathy, in order to improve the diagnosis of this major complication of the disease. METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study, 40 patients with hemophilia A or B, for whom a plasma sample was available, provided informed consent for further analyses (multiplex immunoassays and ELISA) and collection of relevant clinical information in their medical files. Correlations were sought for between biomarkers of interest and the severity of joint lesions assessed according to Pettersson's radiologic score. RESULTS: Two biomarkers were identified, respectively SDF-1α and COMP. Their plasmatic levels were significantly increased in patients with arthropathy compared to controls and patients without arthropathy. These values correlated significantly with the Pettersson score in patients under regular prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Two plasma biomarkers have been identified that could help assess the presence and severity of hemophilic arthropathy.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B.

BACKGROUND: Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

The utility of standing knee radiographs for detection of lipohemarthrosis: comparison with supine horizontal beam radiographs.

OBJECTIVES: Lipohemarthrosis is a key finding in acute trauma patients and indicates an intra-articular fracture. The horizontal beam lateral radiography with supine position is known to be the best technique to demonstrate knee lipohemarthrosis. Our main purpose was to compare the sensitivity of supine and standing lateral knee radiographs to detect lipohemarthrosis. METHODS: In our retrospective study, consecutive patients with lipohemarthrosis on computed tomography of the knee between October 2019 and September 2021 were included. Fractured bone, the presence of lipohemarthrosis, and image quality in both standing and supine anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs were evaluated. Interobserver reliability of the three observers was calculated. Fisher exact chi-square and z-proportion tests were used to compare lateral and anteroposterior knee radiographs. Krippendorff's Alpha and Kappa coefficients were used for inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (38 men [62.3%], 23 women [37.7%]; mean age, 43 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) were included. The most common type of fracture was isolated tibial fractures (n = 32; 52.5%). The sensitivity of showing lipohemarthrosis of standing lateral knee radiographs (95.5%) was higher than supine lateral radiographs (38.5%) (p < 0.001). While non-optimal image quality did not affect lipohemarthrosis detection on lateral radiographs (p > 0.99), it caused a significant decrease in the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis on anteroposterior radiographs (p = 0.036). We found a good-excellent interobserver agreement in lipohemarthrosis detection. CONCLUSIONS: Standing lateral radiographs have higher sensitivity than supine lateral radiographs in detecting lipohemarthrosis and are beneficial for detecting lipohemarthrosis which indicates the presence of occult-evident intraarticular fracture in patients with knee trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Standing lateral knee radiographs offer a useful method for reducing the misdiagnosis of the occult intra-articular fractures by showing the fat-fluid leveling more clearly. Its advantages may be more prominent when the advanced imaging modalities are limited. KEY POINTS: • Fat-fluid level (lipohemarthrosis) is an important radiographic sign to assess patients with acute trauma. It almost always indicates an intra-articular fracture. • Our retrospective study results support that lipohemarthrosis sign could be observed more frequently in standing lateral knee radiographs than in supine lateral radiographs. • Knee trauma patients, when available, should be evaluated with standing lateral radiographs for the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis.

What is the rationale for mesenchymal stromal cells based therapies in the management of hemophilic arthropathies?

Hemophilia A and B are rare X-linked genetic bleeding disorders due to a complete or partial deficiency in the coagulation factors VIII or IX, respectively. The main treatment for hemophilia is prophylactic and based on coagulation factor replacement therapies. These treatments have significantly reduced bleeding and improved the patients' quality of life. Nevertheless, repeated joint bleedings (hemarthroses), even subclinical hemarthroses, can lead to hemophilic arthropathy (HA). This disabling condition is characterized by chronic pain due to synovial inflammation, cartilage and bone destruction requiring ultimately joint replacement. HA resembles to rheumatoid arthritis because of synovitis but HA is considered as having similarities with osteoarthritis as illustrated by the migration of immune cells, production of inflammatory cytokines, synovial hypertrophy and cartilage damage. Various drugs have been evaluated for the management of HA with limited success. The objective of the review is to discuss new therapeutic approaches with a special focus on the studies that have investigated the potential of using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the management of HA. A systematic review of the literature has been made. Most of the studies have focused on the interest of MSCs for the delivery of missing factors VIII or IX but in some studies, more insight on the effect of MSC injection on synovial inflammation or cartilage structure were provided and put in perspective for possible clinical applications.

Predicting the development of hemophilic arthropathy in patients with hemophilia based on patient age: a retrospective single-center database study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hemophilia (PWH) develop hemophilic arthropathy of the major joints due to recurrent hemarthrosis. This study retrospectively estimated the age at which PWH may expect to develop hemophilic arthropathy and undergo joint replacement surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using retrospective data from PWH at a Czech orthopedic center, Kaplan Meier analyses were used to estimate the cumulative proportions of patients with hemophilic arthropathy and undergoing joint replacement surgery as a function of age. RESULTS: Based on 1028 joint examinations in 167 PWH, hemophilic arthropathy of the knees, elbows, ankles and hips was estimated to develop by a median age of 48, 51, 52 and 61 years, respectively, with ≈80% of patients having such damage by ≈70 years of age. Hemophilic arthropathy of the shoulder occurred much later (median >80 years). In patients undergoing knee or hip replacement surgery, hemophilic arthropathy of the knee and hip occurred at a median age of ≈50 and ≈60 years, respectively, with replacement surgery occurring at a median of ≈70 and >75 years. CONCLUSIONS: In PWH, the risk of developing hemophilic arthropathy accumulates continuously over the patient's lifetime, allowing predictions about the ages at which such damage and joint replacement surgery may occur.

Skeletal complications in patients with hemophilia: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Arthropathy is a common complication in patients with hemophilia. We examined the prevalence of this skeletal complication in patients with hemophilia who were registered at a Comprehensive Hemophilia Center in Shiraz, Southern Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, an orthopedic specialist visited 448 patients and conducted screenings for skeletal complications. The assessment included evaluating the type of hemophilia, disease severity, treatment modality, the presence of inhibitors, and the identification of skeletal complications. RESULTS: Ninety patients with hemophilia A, with a mean age (SD) of 31.6 (14.4) years, and 10 patients with hemophilia B, with a mean age of 30.5 (20.6) years, were assessed. The most frequently affected joints were the knee and ankle joints. In the univariate analysis, patients with severe disease were more likely to exhibit synovitis, a target joint, and bone disease compared to patients with non-severe disease. Additionally, a history of treated or active hepatitis and an annual bleeding rate showed significant associations with the target joint. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, disease severity (OR 14.43, 95% CI 1.6-129.6) and a higher age at diagnosis (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13) increased the likelihood of developing osteoporosis. A history of hepatitis (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.28-10.48) was identified as an independent risk factor for the target joint. CONCLUSION: Skeletal complications are a common occurrence in hemophilia. Regular consultations with orthopedic specialists, focusing on bleeding control and hepatitis prevention, are essential for reducing the impact of this debilitating complication.

The role of intraarticular injections of hyaluronic acid in joint pain relief in hemophilic arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain in hemophilic patients is due to joint degeneration associated with hemophilic arthropathy. In addition to appropriate hematological treatment (primary prophylaxis), pharmacologic management and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation should be indicated. When such measures are not sufficient, intraarticular injections (IAIs) of hyaluronic acid (HyA) may be considered. AREAS COVERED: In order to determine whether IAIs of HyA are effective in terms of pain relief in individuals with painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy, a PubMed and Cochrane Library search using 'hemophilia hyaluronic acid' as keywords was performed on 18 July 2023. EXPERT OPINION: In a study of individuals with hemophilic arthropathy (elbows, knees and ankles), 91% of them improved pain after a mean follow-up of 6 years. In another study of individuals with knee arthropathy, after a 7-year follow-up 82% reported an improvement in pain. As for hemophilic ankle arthropathy, in a study 67% of patients showed relief of joint pain at 6-month follow-up. Although the literature on the subject is very heterogeneous and difficult to interpret, it appears that IAIs of HyA can relieve the joint pain of painful moderate hemophilic arthropathy for months. Moreover, the IAIs can be repeated every 6-12 months.

Hemophilic arthropathy: how to diagnose subclinical bleeding early and how to orthopedically treat a damaged joint.

INTRODUCTION: It is important to know the current status of hemophilic arthropathy diagnoses, treatments, complications, and outcomes in developed countries. AREAS COVERED: A bibliographic search in PubMed for articles published from 1 January 2019 through 12 June 2023 was performed. EXPERT OPINION: In developed countries with specialized hemophilia treatment centers, primary hematological prophylaxis (started before the age of 2 years and after no more than one joint bleed) has almost completely eliminated the joint-related problems of the disease. The ideal goal of zero hemarthroses can be achieved only with intense and well-dosed prophylaxis: intravenous infusion of coagulation factor - standard half-life or extended half-life; periodic or subcutaneous injections of nonfactor products (emicizumab or fitusiran). However, hemophilic arthropathy continues to occur due to subclinical joint hemorrhages. In one study, 16% of the joints without reported hemarthroses showed signs of previous subclinical bleeding (hemosiderin deposits with/without synovial hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging were deemed signs of previous subclinical bleeding), rendering evidence for subclinical bleeding in people with severe hemophilia with lifelong prophylaxis treatment. Subclinical joint hemorrhages can be averted only by employing accurate and tailored prophylaxis.

Hemophilia Joint Health Score, Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia, and Pettersson Score in Pediatric Patients With Severe Hemophilia A.

Hemophilia is an X-linked recessive disorder. Children with hemophilia go through spontaneous and trauma-provoked bleeding. Recurring joint bleeds lead to ongoing incapacity. Achieving healthy joints is the primary target of hemophilia management. The current study objective was to assess hemophilic joints in individuals with hemophilic arthropathy clinically, radiographically, and functionally. This cross-sectional study included 50 children with severe hemophilia A who were selected from the pediatric hematology clinic. All children were assessed for Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Joint assessed functionally by Functional Independence Score in Hemophilia (FISH) and radiologically by plain radiograph and scored by the Pettersson scoring system. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The mean age of the studied cases of hemophilia was 8.5±3.1 years. The mean FISH score among the studied patients was 26.8±4.2, the mean HJHS was 16.8±12.8, and the Pettersson score was 4.9±2.7. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS. The number of affected joints showed a significant negative correlation to the FISH score and a significant positive correlation to HJHS. Frequency of hemarthrosis/month showed a significant positive correlation to HJHS.

The hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis.

Prophylaxis is the gold standard treatment for children with haemophilia (CWH). MRI studies revealed joint damage, even with this treatment; this suggests the presence of subclinical bleeding. In the case of children with haemophilia, it is relevant to detect early signs of joint damage, as this allows the medical team to provide the appropriate treatment and follow-up, in order to avoid arthropathy development and its consequences. The aim of this study is to detect the hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis (CWHP) and analyse, by age group, which joint is the most affected. We define the hidden joint in CWH on prophylaxis as the joint that presents joint damage secondary to repetitive bleeding episodes and is detected in the joint evaluation, despite being asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. It is most commonly caused by repetitive subclinical bleeding. METHODS: This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study of 106 CWH on prophylaxis treated in our centre. Patients were divided according to age and type of treatment. Joint damage was defined as a HEAD-US score ≥ 1. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 12 years. All had severe haemophilia. The median age of onset of prophylaxis was 2.7. Forty-seven (44.3 %) patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 59 (55.7 %), secondary prophylaxis. Six hundred and thirty-six joints were analysed. Type of prophylaxis and joint involvement showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). However, patients on PP had a greater number of damaged joints at older ages. Twenty-two % (140) of the joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. Cartilage was most frequently involved, followed by synovitis, and bone damage. We observed a greater frequency and degree of arthropathy in subjects aged 11 and above. Sixty (12.7 %) joints showed a HEAD-US score ≥ 1, with no history of bleeding. The ankle was the most affected joint, representing the hidden joint according to our definition. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis is the best treatment for CWH. However, symptomatic or subclinical joint bleeding may occur. The routine evaluation of joint health is relevant, particularly, of the ankle. In our study, early signs of arthropathy according to age and type of prophylaxis were detected by HEAD-US.

Chronic pain in haemophilia: assessment and analgesic treatment.

People with haemophilia tend to experience pain from an early age because of venipuncture and hemarthrosis. If pain is not properly managed, it can become chronic and bedevil patients throughout their lives. Therapies are currently available that have been shown to effectively treat the different types of pain and their causes. Patients with haemophilia tend to experience either nociceptive or mixed pain. Identification of the cause of pain by means of imaging techniques, and understanding the characteristics, location and intensity of the pain, are essential for a more targeted therapeutic approach. Current data reveal that the most effective measures are administration of haematological and analgesic medication, intraarticular injections, and physical exercise. However, multimodal strategies such as lifestyle changes, physical modalities, psychological support and orthopaedic surgery can also prove of use. This article will look at the most effective analgesic measures used as a part of conservative clinical treatment. Collaborative studies are needed to better understand the nature of pain in the context of haemophilia.

Orthopedic surgical procedures in people with hemophilia.

People with hemophilia tend to develop joint lesions secondary to the recurrent hemarthroses typical of their condition. These usually include chronic synovitis and arthropathy chiefly affecting their ankles, knees, and elbows. In addition, muscular hematomas, albeit less frequently, may also result in complications such as acute compartment syndrome, pseudotumors, bone cysts and peripheral nerve compression. Joint lesions may require some of the following surgical interventions: arthroscopic synovectomy (in cases of synovitis), arthroscopic joint debridement, radial head resection, opening-wedge tibial osteotomy, arthrodesis, arthrodiastasis (of the ankle), tendon lengthening (hamstrings, Achilles tendon), progressive extension of the knee by placing an external fixator in cases of flexion contracture of the knee, supracondylar femoral extension osteotomy in cases of knee flexion contracture and, eventually, a total joint arthroplasty when the affected joint has been destroyed and the patient experiences severe joint pain. Total knee arthroplasty in hemophilic patients is associated with a high infection risk (7% on average). As regards the complications following muscle hematomas, acute compartment syndrome requires urgent performance of a fasciotomy when hematological treatment is incapable of resolving the problem. Surgical resection of hemophilic pseudotumors is the best solution, with those affecting the pelvis (secondary to iliopsoas hematomas) being particularly difficult to resolve. Peripheral nerve lesions can often be effectively addressed with hematological treatment, although a surgical neurolysis of the ulnar nerve is indicated if nonoperative treatment fails.

A contemporary approach to the musculoskeletal problems associated with hemophilia.

ABSTRACT: It is essential that joint bleeds be treated in a hematologically and orthopedically optimal manner so as to arrest the bleeding as soon as possible and prevent potentially irreversible joint damage from setting in. The main goal of rehabilitation in the context of hemophilia is above all prevention and treatment of the consequences of musculoskeletal bleeding. Rehabilitation of acute joint bleeding episodes, that is, hemarthrosis, is based on three fundamental pillars: arthrocentesis, PRICE measures, and rehabilitation protocols.

Haemophilic arthropathy: basic protocols for clinical examination and imaging.

In haemophilia, screening protocols in the prevention and treatment of common lesions still require unification of criteria. Patients with haemophilia seek medical consultation exclusively for two reasons: because they have requested an appointment for a routine check-up (1-2 times a year in case of severe haemophilia) or because they have developed acute bleeding that requires treatment. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of an early differential diagnosis of joint damage and to review the techniques that allow an effective evaluation. The World Federation of Haemophilia recommends the 'Primary Prophylaxis' treatment modality, and today, severe haemophilia patients adhering to that factor VIII/IX therapy have significantly reduced common injuries: haematomas, haemarthrosis, synovitis, and haemophilic arthropathy. The basic protocols and minimum data for the control of musculoskeletal health are described. In summary, the primary goal of the haematologist-led multidisciplinary care team treating patients with haemophilia is likely to restore and/or preserve joint and musculoskeletal health, which is essential to promoting quality of life. Appropriate factor replacement regimens are required to prevent bleeding, these should be combined with physical activity and a physiotherapy program, in accordance with the recommendations of the World Health Organization for the general population.