Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.487
Filter
1.
Age Ageing ; 53(5)2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706390

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) is common in older patients but the use of iron in this context remains understudied. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose to treat anaemia in older patients after AGIB. METHODS: This randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 10 French centres. Eligible patients were 65 years or more, had controlled upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding and a haemoglobin level of 9-11 g/dl. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either one intravenous iron injection of ferric carboxymaltose or one injection of saline solution. The primary endpoint was the difference in haemoglobin level between day 0 and day 42. Secondary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, rehospitalisation and improvement of quality of life (QOL) at day 180. RESULTS: From January 2013 to January 2017, 59 patients were included. The median age of patients was 81.9 [75.8, 87.3] years. At day 42, a significant difference in haemoglobin level increase was observed (2.49 g/dl in the ferric carboxymaltose group vs. 1.56 g/dl in the placebo group, P = 0.02). At day 180, QOL, measured on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30, improved by 10.5 points in the ferric carboxymaltose group and by 8.2 points in the placebo group (P = 0.56). Rates of adverse events and rehospitalisation were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous iron seems safe and effective to treat anaemia in older patients after AGIB and should be considered as a standard-of-care treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01690585).


Subject(s)
Ferric Compounds , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Hemoglobins , Maltose , Maltose/analogs & derivatives , Quality of Life , Humans , Ferric Compounds/adverse effects , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferric Compounds/therapeutic use , Male , Maltose/administration & dosage , Maltose/adverse effects , Maltose/therapeutic use , Female , Aged , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Hemoglobins/analysis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Hematinics/adverse effects , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hematinics/therapeutic use , France , Injections, Intravenous , Age Factors
2.
Int J Artif Organs ; 47(4): 260-268, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Middle uremic toxins (MUTs) can cause anemia and erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Theranova dialyzers may improve anemia management by removing MUTs. Hence, the impact of Theranova dialyzers on erythropoietin responsiveness was studied. METHODS: This exploratory single-center prospective observational study, encompassing 50 patients undergoing dialysis with either the Theranova-400 or FX80 membrane for 6 months, involved monthly tracking of hemoglobin levels, weight-adjusted erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (w-ESA) dosing, and erythropoietin resistance index (ERI), with ESA treatment decisions guided by a proprietary algorithm. RESULTS: The groups were similar in terms of demographics and baseline laboratory test results. The median hemoglobin levels, w-ESA and ERI, were found to be similar between FX80 and Theranova-400 groups at both baseline (11.06 vs 10.57, p = 0.808; 92.3 vs 105.2, p = 0.838; 8.1 vs 10.48, p = 0.876) and the end of the study (11.43 vs 11.03, p = 0.076; 48.7 vs 71.5; 4.48 vs 6.41, p = 0.310), respectively. There was a trend toward lower w-ESA and ERI at the end of the study compared to baseline in both groups, but the difference was non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study of 50 patients undergoing high-flux dialysis with near-target hemoglobin levels, switching to Theranova 400 dialyzers compared to FX80 dialyzers did not show statistically significant differences in maintaining hemoglobin levels, reducing ESA dose, or lowering ERI. The non-randomized design and small sample size limit the study's power to detect true differences. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm findings and definitively assess Theranova 400's benefits.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Hematinics , Hemoglobins , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Male , Female , Prospective Studies , Anemia/blood , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/etiology , Anemia/therapy , Middle Aged , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Aged , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Membranes, Artificial , Treatment Outcome , Adult
5.
Chest ; 161(2): e97-e101, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131080

ABSTRACT

CASE PRESENTATION: An 84-year-old man with an active smoking habit presented to the ED with dyspnea, hemoptysis, and thick phlegm that was difficult to clear. He reported no weight loss, no fever, and no chest pain or dysphonia. He denied both international travel and previous contact with confirmed cases of TB or SARS-CoV-2. He had no known occupational exposures. The patient's personal history included a resolved complete atrioventricular block that required a permanent pacemaker, moderate-to-severe COPD, rheumatoid arthritis (treated with oral prednisone, 2.5 mg/d) and B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (treated with methotrexate and prophylactic oral supplements of ferrous sulfate). Moreover, he was in medical follow up because of a peptic ulcer, atrophic gastritis, and colonic diverticulosis. The patient also had a history of thoracic surgery after an episode of acute mediastinitis from an odontogenic infection, which required ICU management and temporal tracheostomy.


Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Ferrous Compounds , Lung Diseases , Multiple Chronic Conditions/therapy , Respiratory Aspiration , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/methods , Bronchoalveolar Lavage/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Ferrous Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferrous Compounds/adverse effects , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hematinics/adverse effects , Hemoptysis/diagnosis , Hemoptysis/etiology , Humans , Lung Diseases/chemically induced , Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Lung Diseases/therapy , Male , Respiratory Aspiration/complications , Respiratory Aspiration/diagnosis , Respiratory Aspiration/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Withholding Treatment
6.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 27: 10742484211055639, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34994220

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients suffering from heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) have worse outcomes. Treatment with intra-venous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose has been shown to reduce HF rehospitalizations and to improve functional capacity and symptoms in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, IV ferric carboxymaltose is significantly more expensive than IV sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC) limiting its availability to most HF patients around the globe. Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing patients admitted to internal medicine or cardiology departments between January 2013 to December 2018 due to acute decompensated HF (ADHF) and treated with or without IV SFGC on top of standard medical therapy. Results: During the study period, a total of 1863 patients were hospitalized due to ADHF with either HFrEF or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Among them, 840 patients had laboratory evidence of iron deficiency (absolute or functional) and met the inclusion criteria. One hundred twenty-two of them (14.5%) were treated with IV SFGC during the index hospitalization. Patients treated with IV iron were more likely to have history of ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. The rate of readmissions due to ADHF was similar between the groups at 30 days, 3 months, and 1 year. Conclusion: High risk patient hospitalized to ADHF and treated with IV SFGC showed comparable ADHF readmission rates, compared to those who did not receive iron supplementation.


Subject(s)
Ferric Compounds/therapeutic use , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Iron Deficiencies/drug therapy , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Acute Disease , Administration, Intravenous , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/complications , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Humans , Iron Deficiencies/complications , Israel , Male , Retrospective Studies
7.
Br J Anaesth ; 128(2): 272-282, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common and associated with poor outcomes in survivors of critical illness. However, the optimal treatment strategy is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, feasibility RCT to compare either a single dose of ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg i.v. or usual care in patients being discharged from the ICU with moderate or severe anaemia (haemoglobin ≤100 g L-1). We collected data on feasibility (recruitment, randomisation, follow-up), biological efficacy, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-eight participants were randomly allocated (49 in each arm). The overall recruitment rate was 34% with 6.5 participants recruited on average per month. Forty-seven of 49 (96%) participants received the intervention. Patient-reported outcome measures were available for 79/93 (85%) survivors at 90 days. Intravenous iron resulted in a higher mean (standard deviation [sd]) haemoglobin at 28 days (119.8 [13.3] vs 106.7 [14.9] g L-1) and 90 days (130.5 [15.1] vs 122.7 [17.3] g L-1), adjusted mean difference (10.98 g L-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.96-17.01; P<0.001) over 90 days after randomisation. Infection rates were similar in both groups. Hospital readmissions at 90 days post-ICU discharge were lower in the i.v. iron group (7/40 vs 15/39; risk ratio=0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-0.99; P=0.037). The median (inter-quartile range) post-ICU hospital stay was shorter in the i.v. iron group but did not reach statistical significance (5.0 [3.0-13.0] vs 9.0 [5.0-16.0] days, P=0.15). CONCLUSION: A large, multicentre RCT of i.v. iron to treat anaemia in survivors of critical illness appears feasible and is necessary to determine the effects on patient-centred outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13721808 (www.isrctn.com).


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Maltose/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Intravenous , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Critical Care , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Maltose/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Young Adult
8.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 23(10): 662-664, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia is a widespread problem. Although oral and intravenous therapy are available, iron malabsorption is a distinct possibility. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the applicability of the oral iron absorption test (OIAT) as a simple and effective means of determining the degree of oral iron absorption. METHODS: The study comprised 81 patients diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia who were referred to a hematology outpatient clinic. Participants were given two ferrous sulphate tablets. Iron levels in the blood were evaluated at intervals from 30 to 180 minutes after iron administration. RESULTS: We divided patients into three distinct groups. The first group consisted of patients with little iron absorption with a maximum iron increment (Cmax) in the blood of 0-49 ug/dl. The second group had a moderate maximum absorption of 50-100 ug/dl, while a third group had considerable absorption of with maximum iron increase of over 100 ug/dl. CONCLUSIONS: The oral iron absorption test, although not clearly standardized, is easy to conduct in any outpatient clinic. This test can readily and clearly determine absorption or nonabsorption of iron. This test can have major implications on the need of oral or intravenous iron therapy and can also determine the need for further gastrointestinal evaluation of the small intestine, where iron absorption takes place and the success of therapy on subsequent iron absorption.


Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency , Drug Monitoring/methods , Ferrous Compounds , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/physiopathology , Biological Availability , Female , Ferrous Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferrous Compounds/blood , Gastrointestinal Absorption/physiology , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hematinics/blood , Humans , Malabsorption Syndromes/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
9.
BMC Nephrol ; 22(1): 350, 2021 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intravenous iron sucrose is becoming a prevailing treatment for individuals undergoing maintenance haemodialysis, but comparisons of dosing regimens are lacking. The aim of this retrospective review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proactively administered high-dose iron sucrose versus reactively administered low-dose iron sucrose in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis. METHODS: We analysed the data of 1500 individuals with maintenance haemodialysis who were treated with either high-dose iron sucrose that was proactively administered (Group HD) or low-dose iron sucrose that was reactively administered (Group LD) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2020. The primary endpoints were the cumulative doses of iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; the secondary endpoints were the events of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, infection rate, and death from any cause. RESULTS: Of the 2124 individuals, 624 individuals were excluded because they met one or more of the exclusion criteria, thus resulting in 1500 individuals who were eligible for inclusion in the study (Group HD, n = 760 and Group LD, n = 740). The median follow-up for the two cohorts was 32 months (range: 25-36). A significant median difference was detected in the monthly iron dose between the groups (1121 mg [range: 800-1274] in the HD group vs. 366 mg [range: 310-690] in the LD group; p < 0.05). The median dose of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent was 26,323 IU/month (range: 17,596-44,712) in the HD group and 37,934 IU/month (range: 22,402-59,380) in the LD group (median difference: - 7901 IU/month; 95% CI: - 9632--5013; p = 0.000). A significant difference was detected in the secondary endpoints (266 events in 320 cases in the HD group vs. 344 events in 385 cases in the LD group) (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.51-0.79; p < 0.001). A significant difference was not observed in death from any cause (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.48-1.00; p = 0.361). CONCLUSIONS: For individuals undergoing maintenance haemodialysis, high-dose iron sucrose that was proactively administered may be superior to low-dose iron sucrose that was reactively administered with low doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent.


Subject(s)
Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Renal Dialysis , Adult , Aged , Female , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/adverse effects , Hematinics/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
10.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 16(10): 1512-1521, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34470831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Whether iron supplementation in patients on hemodialysis could be delivered by less frequent but higher single doses compared with the currently more common higher-frequency schedules of lower single iron doses is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We carried out an open-label, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial over 40 weeks in patients on prevalent hemodialysis (n=142). We administered in total 2 g iron as 100 mg iron sucrose biweekly in a continuous (20 × 100 mg) fashion or 500 mg ferric carboxymaltose every 10 weeks in a periodic (4 × 500 mg) fashion. The primary end point was the change in hemoglobin at week 40 from baseline with a noninferiority margin of -0.8 g/dl. Secondary end points were changes in ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients completed the study. At 40 weeks, hemoglobin changed by -0.27 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.64 to 0.09) in the iron sucrose arm and by -0.74 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -1.1 to -0.39) in the ferric carboxymaltose arm compared with baseline. Noninferiority was not established in the per-protocol population as hemoglobin changes compared with baseline differed by -0.47 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.95 to 0.01) in the ferric carboxymaltose arm compared with the iron sucrose arm. Proportional changes from baseline to week 40 differed by -31% (98.3% confidence interval, -52 to -0.1) for ferritin, by 1% (98.3% confidence interval, -7 to 10) for transferrin, and by -27% (98.3% confidence interval, -39 to -13) for transferrin saturation in the ferric carboxymaltose arm compared with the iron sucrose arm. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dosing did not differ between groups. The overall number of adverse events was similar; however, more infections were observed in the iron sucrose arm. CONCLUSIONS: An equal cumulative dose of ferric carboxymaltose administered less frequently did not meet noninferiority for maintaining hemoglobin levels compared with iron sucrose administered more frequently. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Comparison Study of Two Iron Compounds for Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients (COPEFER), NCT02198495.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/prevention & control , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Maltose/analogs & derivatives , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/blood , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Austria , Biomarkers/blood , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Ferric Compounds/adverse effects , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/adverse effects , Ferritins/blood , Hematinics/adverse effects , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Maltose/administration & dosage , Maltose/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Time Factors , Transferrin/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
11.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(9): 1221-1229, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34464213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because health plans each issue their own policies, drug coverage can vary. This variation can result in patients having unequal access to treatment. In this study, we evaluate commercial health plans' coverage policies for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for patients with anemia resulting from chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVES: To assess how a set of US commercial health plans cover ESAs for patients with anemia due to CKD. Our second objective was to examine the evidence that the plans reviewed when formulating their coverage policies. METHODS: We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug and Evidence and Coverage Database to identify coverage policies issued by 17 of the largest US commercial health plans for ESAs. The following drugs were indicated for anemia due to CKD: darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, epoetin alfa (available as two brands), and epoetin alfa-epbx. Coverage policies were current as of May 2019. We determined whether the health plans applied any restrictions, such as step therapy protocols or patient subgroup restrictions, in their coverage policies. We categorized the evidence that plans cited to support their policies into seven categories: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world evidence (RWE) studies (studies based on data collected in a real-world setting), other clinical studies (eg, single arm trials), systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, clinical or treatment guidelines, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations. RESULTS: We categorized 72.5% of coverage policies (58/80 policies) as equivalent to the FDA label and 27.5% (22/80 policies) as more restrictive. In restricted policies, plans most often applied step therapy protocols (18/22 policies), followed by prescriber requirements (4/22 policies), and patient subgroup restrictions (3/22 policies). Five health plans applied restrictions in at least half of their coverage policies; seven plans did not apply restrictions in any policy. Plans that cited evidence reviewed an average of 10 citations across their ESA coverage policies, ranging from one to 29 studies. Plans varied with respect to the types of cited studies: at least 50% of evidence cited by five health plans was RCTs, while half or more of the evidence cited by four health plans was clinical or treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Health plans varied in how they covered ESAs for patients with anemia due to CKD and in the evidence cited in their coverage policies. Inconsistencies in plans' coverage policies may have implications for patients' access to ESAs. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization. Sanon, Redmond, and Mogahadam are employed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical. Michalopoulos was employed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical at the time of this study. Margaretos, Panzer, and Chambers are employed by Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health. Lai was with Tufts Medical Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at the time of this study.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/etiology , Hematinics , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hematinics/economics , Organizational Policy
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(6): 668.e1-668.e9, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies that have compared the effectiveness of oral with intravenous iron supplements to treat postpartum anemia have shown mixed results. The superiority of one mode of treatment vs the other has yet to be demonstrated. Therefore, despite guidelines and standards of care, treatment approaches vary across practices. A single 500 mg dose of iron sucrose, which is higher than what is usually administered, has not been evaluated to treat postpartum moderate to severe anemia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous iron sucrose alone with intravenous iron sucrose in combination with oral iron bisglycinate supplementation in treating moderate to severe postpartum anemia. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between February 2015 and June 2020. Women with postpartum hemoglobin level of ≤9.5 g/dL were treated with 500 mg intravenous iron sucrose after an anemia workup, which ruled out other causes for anemia. In addition to receiving intravenous iron, women were randomly allocated to receive either 60 mg of oral iron bisglycinate for 45 days or no further iron supplementation. The primary outcome was hemoglobin level at 6 weeks after delivery. Secondary outcomes were iron storage parameters and quality of life. RESULTS: Of 158 patients who participated, 63 women receiving intravenous and oral iron, and 44 women receiving intravenous iron-only, completed the study and were included in the analysis. Baseline and obstetrical characteristics were similar between the study cohorts. Although statistically significant, postpartum hemoglobin levels were only 0.4 g/dL higher in the intravenous and oral iron than intravenous iron-only cohort (12.4 g/dL vs 12.0 g/dL, respectively; P=.03), with a respective increase from baseline of 4.2 g/dL vs 3.7 g/dL (P=.03). There was no difference in the rate of women with hemoglobin level of <12.0 or 11.0 g/dL. Iron storage and health quality were not different between the cohorts. Oral iron treatment was associated with 29% rate of adverse effects. Compliance and satisfaction from treatment protocol were high in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Intravenous 500 mg iron sucrose treatment alone is sufficient to treat postpartum anemia without the necessity of adding oral iron treatment.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Ferrous Compounds/therapeutic use , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Prenatal Care , Puerperal Disorders/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Female , Ferrous Compounds/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
13.
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol ; 321(2): R152-R161, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34160288

ABSTRACT

Current markers of iron deficiency (ID), such as ferritin and hemoglobin, have shortcomings, and hepcidin and erythroferrone (ERFE) could be of clinical relevance in relation to early assessment of ID. Here, we evaluate whether exposure to altitude-induced hypoxia (2,320 m) alone, or in combination with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) treatment, affects hepcidin and ERFE levels before alterations in routine ID biomarkers and stress erythropoiesis manifest. Two interventions were completed, each comprising a 4-wk baseline, a 4-wk intervention at either sea level or altitude, and a 4-wk follow-up. Participants (n = 39) were randomly assigned to 20 IU·kg body wt-1 rHuEPO or placebo injections every second day for 3 wk during the two intervention periods. Venous blood was collected weekly. Altitude increased ERFE (P ≤ 0.001) with no changes in hepcidin or routine iron biomarkers, making ERFE of clinical relevance as an early marker of moderate hypoxia. rHuEPO treatment at sea level induced a similar pattern of changes in ERFE (P < 0.05) and hepcidin levels (P < 0.05), demonstrating the impact of accelerated erythropoiesis and not of other hypoxia-induced mechanisms. Compared with altitude alone, concurrent rHuEPO treatment and altitude exposure induced additive changes in hepcidin (P < 0.05) and ERFE (P ≤ 0.001) parallel with increases in hematocrit (P < 0.001), demonstrating a relevant range of both hepcidin and ERFE. A poor but significant correlation between hepcidin and ERFE was found (R2 = 0.13, P < 0.001). The findings demonstrate that hepcidin and ERFE are more rapid biomarkers of changes in iron demands than routine iron markers. Finally, ERFE and hepcidin may be sensitive markers in an antidoping context.


Subject(s)
Altitude Sickness/blood , Altitude , Epoetin Alfa/administration & dosage , Erythropoiesis/drug effects , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hepcidins/blood , Iron/blood , Peptide Hormones/blood , Altitude Sickness/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Denmark , Double-Blind Method , Female , Homeostasis , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Spain , Time Factors
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(20): e24571, 2021 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011020

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common among obstetric and gynecologic patients. This systematic review aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of commonly used intravenous (IV) iron formulations, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), and iron sucrose (IS) in the treatment of IDA in obstetric and gynecologic patients. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV iron replacement using FCM and IS up to October 2019. The primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of FCM and IS, assessed by measuring serum hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin levels before and after iron replacement. The secondary outcome was to compare the safety of FCM and IS, assessed by the incidence of adverse events during iron replacement. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: We identified 9 RCTs with 910 patients (FCM group, n = 456; IS group, n = 454). Before iron replacement, FCM and IS group patients had similar baseline Hb (mean difference [MD], 0.04 g/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to 015; I2 = 0%; P = 0.48) and ferritin levels (MD, -0.42 ng/mL; 95% CI, -1.61 to 0.78; I2 = 45%; P = 0.49). Following iron replacement, patients who received FCM had higher Hb (MD, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.25-1.08; I2 = 92%; P = 0.002) and ferritin levels (MD, 24.41; 95% CI, 12.06-36.76; I2 = 75%; P = 0.0001) than patients who received IS. FCM group showed a lower incidence of adverse events following iron replacement than IS group (risk ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.80; I2 = 0%; P = 0.003). Serious adverse events were not reported in any group. CONCLUSION: FCM group showed better efficacy in increasing Hb and ferritin levels and a favorable safety profile with fewer adverse events compared with IS group for IDA treatment among obstetric and gynecologic patients. However, this meta-analysis was limited by the small number of RCTs and high heterogeneity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, registration number CRD42019148905).


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Maltose/analogs & derivatives , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/blood , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Female , Ferric Compounds/adverse effects , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/adverse effects , Ferritins/blood , Hematinics/adverse effects , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Maltose/administration & dosage , Maltose/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/blood , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/diagnosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
15.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 20(8): 937-947, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877003

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Beta-thalassemia is an autosomal recessive hereditary anemia characterized by reduced or absent ß-globin chain synthesis, affecting about 60,000 people peryear. Management for ß-thalassemia major includes regular blood transfusions followed by iron chelating therapy and drug targeting ineffective erythropoiesis.Areas covered: The safety of licensed drugs for the management of ß-thalassemia is reviewed, using evidence from clinical trials and observational research. Such drugs include the iron chelators and the erythrocyte maturation agent luspatercept. The safety of emerging treatment, such as hydroxyurea and thalidomide is also reviewed.Expert opinion: Beta-thalassemia is arare disease, and is not surprising that there are limited studies investigating the safety of drugs used in this disease. Indeed, although observational studies are the main source of drug safety information in areal-world setting, only eleven studies were identified for iron-chelators and none of these estimated the risk of agiven safety outcome. Future work should aim to better leverage existing sources of real-world datato investigate drug safety in thalassemia.


Subject(s)
Activin Receptors, Type II/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/adverse effects , Iron Chelating Agents/adverse effects , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , beta-Thalassemia/drug therapy , Activin Receptors, Type II/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hematinics/adverse effects , Humans , Hydroxyurea/administration & dosage , Hydroxyurea/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/administration & dosage , Iron Chelating Agents/administration & dosage , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/adverse effects , beta-Thalassemia/physiopathology
16.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(9): 733-741, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33844381

ABSTRACT

AIM: Darbepoetin alpha is available as Aranesp® and NESP®, which differ in the inactive component and maximum dose-strength of prefilled syringes. We conducted an observational cohort study to investigate optimal conversion strategies and the feasibility of extending dosing intervals with higher-dose preparations in dialysis patients converting from Aranesp® to NESP®. METHODS: Adult dialysis patients on Aranesp® with stable haemoglobin of 9-12 g/dL were converted to NESP® at the same monthly total dose according to one of three conversion regimens. Group A included patients on ≤80 mcg/month of Aranesp® who converted with dosing regimen unchanged. Group B patients converted to NESP® with extended dosing intervals using higher individual dose preparations. Group C were patients on 100 mcg Aranesp® who converted to NESP® 120 mcg with extended dosing intervals. Patients were observed for 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. All 24 Group A patients maintained stable haemoglobin. In Group B, 10 patients (50%) maintained stable haemoglobin with extension of dosing interval from 1.04 ± 0.14 to 3.03 ± 1.28 weeks. Factors associated with success in extending dosing interval included a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease and a higher Kt/Vurea in peritoneal dialysis patients. Four patients (80%) in Group C maintained stable haemoglobin after conversion to NESP® 120 mcg with extended dosing interval. The use of NESP® 120 mcg was well tolerated, and was associated with reduced patient-reported pain score and 38% reduction of drug cost. CONCLUSION: Dialysis patients on Aranesp® can be successfully converted to NESP® and the dosing interval can be extended successfully in a significant proportion of patients, which could reduce discomfort and drug cost.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Darbepoetin alfa/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Aged , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/etiology , Cohort Studies , Darbepoetin alfa/economics , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Costs , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hematinics/economics , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Male , Middle Aged
17.
Nutrients ; 13(2)2021 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33673371

ABSTRACT

Anemia is a frequent complication of ulcerative colitis, and is frequently caused by iron deficiency. Oral iron supplementation displays high rates of gastrointestinal adverse effects. However, the formulation of sucrosomial iron (SI) has shown higher tolerability. We performed a prospective study to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of oral SI and intravenous ferric carboxy-maltose (FCM) in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission and mild-to-moderate anemia. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 60 mg/day for 8 weeks and then 30 mg/day for 4 weeks of oral SI or intravenous 1000 mg of FCM at baseline. Hemoglobin and serum levels of iron and ferritin were assessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks from baseline. Hemoglobin and serum iron increased in both groups after 4 weeks of therapy, and remained stable during follow up, without significant treatment or treatment-by-time interactions (p = 0.25 and p = 0.46 for hemoglobin, respectively; p = 0.25 and p = 0.26 for iron, respectively). Serum ferritin did not increase over time during SI supplementation, while it increased in patients treated with FCM (treatment effect, p = 0.0004; treatment-by-time interaction effect, p = 0.0002). Overall, this study showed that SI and FCM displayed similar effectiveness and tolerability for treatment of mild-to-moderate anemia in patients with ulcerative colitis under remission.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferric Oxide, Saccharated/administration & dosage , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Maltose/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Female , Ferritins/blood , Hemoglobins/drug effects , Humans , Iron/blood , Male , Maltose/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Int J Med Sci ; 18(8): 1831-1839, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33746600

ABSTRACT

Anemia, for which erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron supplements (ISs) are used as preventive measures, presents important difficulties for hemodialysis patients. Nevertheless, the number of physicians able to manage such medications appropriately is not keeping pace with the rapid increase of hemodialysis patients. Moreover, the high cost of ESAs imposes heavy burdens on medical insurance systems. An artificial-intelligence-supported anemia control system (AISACS) trained using administration direction data from experienced physicians has been developed by the authors. For the system, appropriate data selection and rectification techniques play important roles. Decision making related to ESAs poses a multi-class classification problem for which a two-step classification technique is introduced. Several validations have demonstrated that AISACS exhibits high performance with correct classification rates of 72%-87% and clinically appropriate classification rates of 92%-98%.


Subject(s)
Anemia/prevention & control , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Machine Learning , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/etiology , Datasets as Topic , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Iron/administration & dosage , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
19.
BMC Nephrol ; 22(1): 115, 2021 03 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33784968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency (ID) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Intravenous (IV) iron in heart failure leads to improvement in exercise capacity and improvement in quality-of-life measurements; however, data in patients with CKD are lacking. METHODS: The Iron and the Heart Study was a prospective double blinded randomised study in non-anaemic CKD stages 3b-5 patients with ID which investigated whether 1000 mg of IV iron (ferric derisomaltose (FDI)) could improve exercise capacity in comparison to placebo measured at 1 and 3 months post infusion. Secondary objectives included effects on haematinic profiles and haemoglobin, safety analysis and quality of life questionnaires (QoL). RESULTS: We randomly assigned 54 patients mean (SD) age for FDI (n = 26) 61.6 (10.1) years vs placebo (n = 28; 57.8 (12.9) years) and mean eGFR (33.2 (9.3) vs. 29.1 (9.6) ml/min/1.73m2) at baseline, respectively. Adjusting for baseline measurements, six-minute walk test (6MWT) showed no statistically significant difference between arms at 1 month (p = 0.736), or 3 months (p = 0.741). There were non-significant increases in 6MWT from baseline to 1 and 3 months in the FDI arm. Haemoglobin (Hb) at 1 and 3 months remained stable. There were statistically significant increases in ferritin (SF) and transferrin saturation (TSAT) at 1 and 3 months (p < 0.001). There was a modest numerical improvement in QoL parameters. There were no adverse events attributable to IV iron. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a short-term beneficial effect of FDI on exercise capacity, but it was not significant despite improvements in parameters of iron status, maintenance of Hb concentration, and numerical increases in functional capacity and quality of life scores. A larger study will be required to confirm if intravenous iron is beneficial in iron deficient non-anaemic non-dialysis CKD patients without heart failure to improve the 6MWT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) No: 2014-004133-16 REC no: 14/YH/1209 Date First Registered: 2015-02-17 and date of end of trail 2015-05-23 Sponsor ref R1766 and Protocol No: IHI 141.


Subject(s)
Disaccharides/administration & dosage , Functional Status , Hematinics/administration & dosage , Iron Deficiencies/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Disaccharides/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Tolerance/drug effects , Female , Ferric Compounds/administration & dosage , Ferric Compounds/adverse effects , Hematinics/adverse effects , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Iron Deficiencies/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...