Classification of combined partial knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: There has been a recent resurgence in interest in combined partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The varied terminology used to describe these procedures leads to confusion and ambiguity in communication between surgeons, allied health professionals, and patients. A standardized classification system is required for patient safety, accurate clinical record-keeping, clear communication, correct coding for appropriate remuneration, and joint registry data collection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An advanced PubMed search was conducted, using medical subject headings (MeSH) to identify terms and abbreviations used to describe knee arthroplasty procedures. The search related to TKA, unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), and combined PKA procedures. Surveys were conducted of orthopaedic surgeons, trainees, and biomechanical engineers, who were asked which of the descriptive terms and abbreviations identified from the literature search they found most intuitive and appropriate to describe each procedure. The results were used to determine a popular consensus. RESULTS: Survey participants preferred "bi-unicondylar arthroplasty" (Bi-UKA) to describe ipsilateral medial and lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty; "medial bi-compartmental arthroplasty" (BCA-M) to describe ipsilateral medial unicompartmental arthroplasty with patellofemoral arthroplasty; "lateral bi-compartmental arthroplasty" (BCA-L) to describe ipsilateral lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with patellofemoral arthroplasty; and tri-compartmental arthroplasty (TCA) to describe ipsilateral patellofemoral and medial and lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties. "Combined partial knee arthroplasty" (CPKA) was the favoured umbrella term. CONCLUSION: We recommend bi-unicondylar arthroplasty (Bi-UKA), medial bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA-M), lateral bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA-L), and tricompartmental arthroplasty (TCA) as the preferred terms to classify CPKA procedures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:922-928.

Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs.

BACKGROUND: In a clinical setting, a visual evaluation of post-implant radiographs is often used to assess the restoration of glenohumeral joint anatomy after resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and is a part of the decision-making process, in combination with other parameters, when evaluating patients with inferior clinical results. However, the reliability of this method of visual evaluation has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. METHODS: Six experienced shoulder surgeons independently classified implant inclination, size of the implant and if the joint seemed overstuffed, in 219 cases of post-implant radiographs. All cases were classified twice 3 weeks apart. Only radiographs with an anterior-posterior projection with a freely visible joint space were used. Non-weighted Cohen's kappa values were calculated for each coder pair and the mean used as an estimate of the overall inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: The overall inter-observer agreement for implant size (kappa, 0.48 and 0.41) and inclination angle was moderate in both rounds (kappa, 0.46 and 0.44), but only a fair agreement was found concerning the evaluation for stuffing of the joint (kappa, 0.24 and 0.28). Intra-observer agreement for implant size and stuffing ranged from fair to substantial while the agreement for inclination was moderate to substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a visual evaluation of plain radiographs may be inadequate to evaluate overstuffing, implant positioning, and size following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty using plain standardized radiographs. Future studies may contribute to elucidate whether reliability increases if consensus on clear definitions and standardized methods of evaluation is made.

Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) increases with the ageing of numerous societies, injury-related decline is observed in many patients. Treatment strategies have evolved towards primary joint replacement, but the impact of different approaches remains a matter of debate. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the benefit of an anterior minimally-invasive (AMIS) compared to a lateral Hardinge (LAT) approach for hemiarthroplasty in these oftentimes frail patients. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-nine patients were screened during the 44-months trial, aiming at the evaluation of 150 patients > 60 yrs. of age. Eligible patients were randomised using an online-tool with completely random assignment. As primary endpoint, early mobility, a predictor for long-term outcomes, was evaluated at 3 weeks via the "Timed up and go" test (TUG). Secondary endpoints included the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), pain, complications, one-year mobility and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients were randomised; both groups were comparable at baseline, with a predominance for frailty-associated factors in the AMIS-group. At 3 weeks, 146 patients were assessed for the primary outcome. There was a reduction in the median duration of TUG performance of 21.5% (CI [- 41.2,4.7], p = 0.104) in the AMIS-arm (i.e., improved mobility). This reduction was more pronounced in patients with signs of frailty or cognitive impairment. FIM scores increased on average by 6.7 points (CI [0.5-12.8], p = 0.037), pain measured on a 10-point visual analogue scale decreased on average by 0.7 points (CI: [- 1.4,0.0], p = 0.064). The requirement for blood transfusion was lower in the AMIS- group, the rate of complications comparable, with a higher rate of soft tissue complications in the LAT-group. The mortality was higher in the AMIS-group. CONCLUSION: These results, similar to previous reports, support the concept that in elderly patients at risk of frailty, the AMIS approach for hemiarthroplasty can be beneficial, since early mobilisation and pain reduction potentially reduce deconditioning, morbidity and loss of independence. The results are, however, influenced by a plethora of factors. Only improvements in every aspect of the therapeutic chain can lead to optimisation of treatment and improve outcomes in this growing patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01408693 (registered August 3rd 2011).

Hip fracture-great steps forward but we still need better evidence. A commentary on NICE CG124 and QS16 on fractured neck of femur.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated its Clinical Guideline and its Quality Standard on hip fracture in 2017. Three quality statements relate to the organisation of care-having a multidisciplinary hip fracture programme, and both operating and starting rehabilitation without delay-while three relate to surgical aspects, the most recent being the requirement to offer total hip replacement rather than hemiarthroplasty for those with displaced intracapsular fractures who could mobilise outdoors with a stick. Some evidence exists to support this, but the timely provision of this more complex and specialised operation presents a logistical challenge to many units. The evidence for many more general aspects of the care of hip fracture patients is still extrapolated from other populations, and more research is needed to guide the care of this specific group.

Does restoration of leg length and femoral offset play a role in functional outcome one year after hip hemiarthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between specific joint biomechanical parameters and 1year functional outcome scores in elderly patients receiving hemiarthroplasty in the setting of intracapsular hip fractures. METHODS: This is a retrospective, institutional registry based study. 168 hip hemarthroplasties were captured from October 2013 to June 2015. Patients were excluded based on contralateral hip surgery, perioperative complications or inadequate radiographs. 84 patients were alive at one year follow up. We compared mobility and pain scores to radiographically determined variations of leg lengths and femoral offset. We also compared the performance of fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons to their non-fellowship trained counterparts. RESULTS: The operated leg was a mean of 1.12±6.8mm longer than the contralateral. leg length discrepancy (LLD) was less than 10mm in 72 patients. Mean difference in offset between limbs was 0.25±3.3mm. The difference was within 5mm in 79 patients (94%). We found no statistically significant correlation between mobility or pain scores and variations in leg length or offset. We found significantly better performance of the arthroplasty surgeons in restoring leg length but no difference in offset reconstruction or functional benefit for the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was unable to demonstrate a significant relationship between leg length or femoral offset restoration and the patient's ultimate functional recovery. Arthroplasty surgeons performed better in restoring leg length, but no associated functional advantage was seen.

Historical implant or current best standard? Minimum five year follow-up outcomes of cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasties.

UK NICE guidelines recommend abandoning the Thompson hemiarthroplasty (TH) in favour of a 'proven prosthesis' such as the Exeter Trauma Stem. The aim of this study was to assess the hip fracture treatment with the TH. Between 2002 and 2006, 430 cemented THs were performed (minimum 5 year follow-up). Death rates at 1 year and 5 years were 26.6% and 67.4% with low complication (Dislocation 1.4%) and revision rate (1.2%). The TH remains a reliable and proven implant in appropriate patients (over the age of 80, with low activity levels, low ambulatory status and who maybe cognitively impaired), due to low complication and revision rates. Modern implants may provide better function or longevity, but there is little evidence to support abandoning the TH.

Neuroapraxia del nervio hipogloso tras hemiartroplastia de hombro / Hypoglossal nerve neuropraxia after shoulder hemiarthroplasty

Se describe un caso de afectación del nervio hipogloso después de un recambio de hemiartroplastia de hombro con anestesia general con intubación orotraqueal sin complicaciones. Previamente se había realizado un bloqueo interescalénico guiado por ultrasonidos con el paciente despierto. La cirugía se llevó a cabo en posición de semisedestación. Tras la intervención, el paciente refirió clínica compatible con parálisis del nervio hipogloso derecho, iniciada de forma paulatina, que desapareció 4 semanas después. Varios mecanismos se han descrito como causantes de esta alteración neurológica, entre ellos la hiperextensión de la cabeza en el momento de la intubación, la presión ejercida por el neumotaponamiento, o la posición excesivamente hiperextendida o lateralizada de la cabeza durante la cirugía. Se discuten las posibles causas, los factores predisponentes y se sugieren medidas de prevención (AU)

We report a case of hypoglossal nerve damage after shoulder hemiarthroplasty with the patient in «beach chair» position, performed with general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation, and without complications. An ultrasound-guided interscalene block was previously performed in an alert patient. After the intervention, the patient showed clinical symptomatology compatible with paralysis of the right hypoglossal nerve that completely disappeared after 4 weeks. Mechanisms such as hyperextension of the neck during intubation, endotracheal tube cuff pressure, excessive hyperextension, or head lateralization during surgery have been described as causes of this neurological damage. We discuss the causes, the associated factors and suggest preventive measures (AU)

Implant standardization for hemiarthroplasty: implementation of a pricing matrix system at a level II community based trauma system.

Our purpose was to perform a clinical and financial analysis of a pricing matrix system on operative hip fracture care concerning hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly low demand patients. Data analysis on 81 pre-matrix and 88 post-matrix patients demonstrated no significant differences in age, sex, ASA or fracture pattern between the two groups. No difference in surgical approach, cement use, prosthesis choice, operative time, estimated blood loss, or intra-operative complication rate was observed. No radiographic difference in subsidence or loosening was demonstrated. Readmission form cardiac, UTI, PE or DVT rates were similar between groups and no increase in revision surgery or mortality was observed. Overall, our hospital realized a 37% reduction in implant costs, resulting in $165,500 savings for the calendar year.