Viral and cellular determinants involved in hepadnaviral entry.

Hepadnaviridae is a family of hepatotropic DNA viruses that is divided into the genera orthohepadnavirus of mammals and avihepadnavirus of birds. All members of this family can cause acute and chronic hepatic infection, which in the case of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) constitutes a major global health problem. Although our knowledge about the molecular biology of these highly liver-specific viruses has profoundly increased in the last two decades, the mechanisms of attachment and productive entrance into the differentiated host hepatocytes are still enigmatic. The difficulties in studying hepadnaviral entry were primarily caused by the lack of easily accessible in vitro infection systems. Thus, for more than twenty years, differentiated primary hepatocytes from the respective species were the only in vitro models for both orthohepadnaviruses (e.g. HBV) and avihepadnaviruses (e.g. duck hepatitis B virus [DHBV]). Two important discoveries have been made recently regarding HBV: (1) primary hepatocytes from tree-shrews; i.e., Tupaia belangeri, can be substituted for primary human hepatocytes, and (2) a human hepatoma cell line (HepaRG) was established that gains susceptibility for HBV infection upon induction of differentiation in vitro. A number of potential HBV receptor candidates have been described in the past, but none of them have been confirmed to function as a receptor. For DHBV and probably all other avian hepadnaviruses, carboxypeptidase D (CPD) has been shown to be indispensable for infection, although the exact role of this molecule is still under debate. While still restricted to the use of primary duck hepatocytes (PDH), investigations performed with DHBV provided important general concepts on the first steps of hepadnaviral infection. However, with emerging data obtained from the new HBV infection systems, the hope that DHBV utilizes the same mechanism as HBV only partially held true. Nevertheless, both HBV and DHBV in vitro infection systems will help to: (1) functionally dissect the hepadnaviral entry pathways, (2) perform reverse genetics (e.g. test the fitness of escape mutants), (3) titrate and map neutralizing antibodies, (4) improve current vaccines to combat acute and chronic infections of hepatitis B, and (5) develop entry inhibitors for future clinical applications.

Superinfection exclusion in duck hepatitis B virus infection is mediated by the large surface antigen.

Superinfection exclusion is the phenomenon whereby a virus prevents the subsequent infection of an already infected host cell. The Pekin duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) model was used to investigate superinfection exclusion in hepadnavirus infections. Superinfection exclusion was shown to occur both in vivo and in vitro with a genetically marked DHBV, DHBV-ClaI, which was unable to establish an infection in either DHBV-infected ducklings or DHBV-infected primary duck hepatocytes (PDHs). In addition, exclusion occurred in vivo even when the second virus had a replicative advantage. Superinfection exclusion appears to be restricted to DHBV, as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1, and vesicular stomatitis virus were all capable of efficiently infecting DHBV-infected PDHs. Exclusion was dependent on gene expression by the original infecting virus, since UV-irradiated DHBV was unable to mediate the exclusion of DHBV-ClaI. Using recombinant adenoviruses expressing DHBV proteins, we determined that the large surface antigen mediated exclusion. The large surface antigen is known to cause down-regulation of a DHBV receptor, carboxypeptidase D (CPD). Receptor down-regulation is a mechanism of superinfection exclusion seen in other viral infections, and so it was investigated as a possible mechanism of DHBV-mediated exclusion. However, a mutant large surface antigen which did not down-regulate CPD was still capable of inhibiting DHBV infection of PDHs. In addition, exclusion of DHBV-ClaI did not correlate with a decrease in CPD levels. Finally, virus binding assays and confocal microscopy analysis of infected PDHs indicated that the block in infection occurs after internalization of the second virus. We suggest that superinfection exclusion may result from the role of the L surface antigen as a regulator of intracellular trafficking.

Spread of hepatitis B viruses in vitro requires extracellular progeny and may be codetermined by polarized egress.

Viruses can spread by different mechanisms: via intracellular particles through cell junctions to neighboring cells or via secreted virions to adjacent or remote cells. The observation of clusters of hepadnavirus-infected cells both in vivo and in primary hepatocytes neither proves the first mechanism nor excludes the second. In order to test which mechanism, if not both, is used by hepatitis B viruses in order to spread, we used primary duck hepatocytes and duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) as an infection model. If extracellular progeny virus alone determines spreading, neutralizing antisera or drugs blocking virus binding to hepatocytes should abolish secondary infection. In order to test this, we used DHBV envelope-specific neutralizing antisera, as well as suramin, a known inhibitor of infection. Both reagents strongly reduced hepatocellular attachment of viral particles and almost completely abolished primary infection, whereas an ongoing intracellular infection was not affected as long as no progeny virus was released. In contrast, incubation of infected primary hepatocytes with these reagents during release of progeny virus completely prevented secondary infection. Moreover, the combination of electron and immunofluorescence microscopy analyses revealed the residence of viral particles in cytoplasmic vesicles preferentially located near the basolateral membrane of infected hepatocytes. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that hepatitis B viruses mainly spread by secreted, extracellular progeny and point to polarized egress of viral particles into intercellular compartments, which restricts their diffusion and favors transmission of virus to adjacent cells.

Characterization of age- and dose-related outcomes of duck hepatitis B virus infection.

Experimental inoculation of naive ducks with duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) can lead to one of three outcomes, namely, persistent viremia, transient infection with or without viremia, or no evidence of infection. The ability of individual ducks to resolve DHBV infection was found to be linked to the age of the duck at the time of inoculation and the dose of inoculated virus. (1) In recently hatched ducks inoculated intravenously (i.v.) with 4 x 10(4) DHBV DNA genomes, a switch from persistent viremia to transient antibody appearance was seen at an age of inoculation between 7 and 14 days. A 25-fold increase in the dose of virus (1 x 10(6) DHBV genomes) delayed this switch by 7 days. (2) When 4-month-old ducks were inoculated i.v. with different doses of virus, only those receiving the highest dose (2 x 10(11) DHBV genomes) showed viremia and extensive viral replication and histological changes in the liver; 2/3 ducks in this group had a transient infection, while the third duck had viral replication and histological changes in the liver that were still present at day 120 postinoculation (p.i.). In all ducks receiving lower doses (1 x 10(3), 1 x 10(6), 1 x 10(9) DHBV genomes) antibodies to viral surface and core antigens developed without detectable viral replication in the liver on days 6, 9, or 12 p.i. (3) When 10- to 16-month-old ducks were inoculated i.v. with 2 x 10(11) DHBV genomes, all showed extensive viral replication in hepatocytes and mild to moderate histological changes in the liver on days 4 or 6 p.i. In 4/5 ducks viremia was not detected, anti-surface antibodies were first detected on day 8 p.i., and viral DNA and antigen were cleared from the liver by days 35-47 p.i. The remaining duck became viremic with persistence of virus in the liver until at least day 46 p.i. The findings of the study are consistent with a model for noncytopathic viruses (R. M. Zinkernagel (1996) Science 271, 173-178).

DHBV manipulation and prediction of the outcome of infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The immunological response of ducks to acute infection with duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) has not been fully characterised. In this study the relationship between viral dose and the outcome of infection in immune competent 26-day-old ducks was examined. METHODS: Indirect ELISA assays were developed to detect the presence of antibody to DHB surface antigen and DHB core antigen. A DHBV serum pool was titrated in 1-day-old and 26-day-old ducklings. RESULTS: The ID50 dose of the ducks injected at 26 days of age was found to be 1000 times that of the ducks injected on day of hatch. The antibody responses and serum DHBV DNA were followed in eight ducks inoculated with DHBV positive serum when 26 days of gene and in three ducks infected with DHBV on day of hatch. The three ducks infected on day of hatch were viraemic by day 7 and remained highly viraemic throughout the experimental period. In the older ducks, inoculation with 1000ID50 resulted in the development of chronic carriage, while inoculation with either 100 or 10ID50 doses resulted in acute infection with or without viraemia. These ducks were able to clear the infection from their circulation, but only 50% cleared DHBV from the liver within the experimental period. All infected ducks developed anti-core activity. Only non-viraemic ducks developed anti-surface activity. CONCLUSION: DHBV infection can be established in immune competent adolescent ducks, with variable disease outcomes comparable to HBV infection in humans.

Gene expression and active virus replication in the liver after injection of duck hepatitis B virus DNA into the peripheral vein of ducklings.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Duck hepatitis B virus is a member of the hepadnavirus family, which possesses strong hepatotropism. Duck hepatitis B virus DNA serves as a replicative template for producing biologically active virus particles after transfection into cell lines established from human hepatocellular carcinoma or into duck liver by direct injection of calcium phosphate-precipitated DNA. Our aim was to develop a new method of liver-specific gene expression after intravenous DNA delivery. METHODS/RESULTS: We inoculated duck hepatitis B virus DNA with and without cationic liposomes, Lipofectin or LipofectAMINE, as DNA carries. Two weeks after a single intravenous injection of 10 or 50 micrograms of plasmid DNA containing a head-to-tail dimer of duck hepatitis B virus DNA into 25 one-day old ducklings, duck hepatitis B virus RNA transcripts including the pregenome replicative intermediate were detected by Northern blot in the liver of eight ducks (100%) of the Lipofectin group, five ducks (63%) of the LipofectAMINE group, and three ducks (50%) of the group which received DNA without carrier. Duck hepatitis B virus RNA transcription was almost exclusively liver specific, even though the liposomes had no tissue specificity. Replicative forms of duck hepatitis B virus DNA were detected in the liver and DHBsAg was observed in the cytoplasm of the hepatocytes by immunostaining. The serum of transfected ducklings contained virus particles which were infectious in other ducklings. CONCLUSION: The efficient and liver-specific expression of inoculated DNA was due to the amplification of nucleic acids by active virus replication process under the control of hepatocyte specific regulation.