Viral hepatitis and pregnancy.

The management of viral hepatitis in the setting of pregnancy requires special consideration. There are five liver-specific viruses (hepatitis A, B, C, D, E), each with unique epidemiology, tendency to chronicity, risk of liver complications and response to antiviral therapies. In the setting of pregnancy, the liver health of the mother, the influence of pregnancy on the clinical course of the viral infection and the effect of the virus or liver disease on the developing infant must be considered. Although all hepatitis viruses can harm the mother and the child, the greatest risk to maternal health and subsequently the fetus is seen with acute hepatitis A virus or hepatitis E virus infection during pregnancy. By contrast, the primary risks for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis D virus are related to the severity of the underlying liver disease in the mother and the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) for HBV and HCV. The prevention of MTCT is key to reducing the global burden of chronic viral hepatitis, and prevention strategies must take into consideration local health-care and socioeconomic challenges. This Review presents the epidemiology of acute and chronic viral hepatitis infection in pregnancy, the effect of pregnancy on the course of viral infection and, conversely, the influence of the viral infection on maternal and infant outcomes, including MTCT.

Europe's hepatitis challenge.

A hidden epidemic is coming to light in Europe but under-reporting and late diagnosis continue to hamper progress in preventing hepatitis B and C infections. Vijay Shankar Balakrishnan reports.

Factors associated with voluntary testing for HBV in the Upper West Region of Ghana.

This study examined the role of health facilities on testing for Hepatitis B virus in a policy context where screening is only available at a cost. We fitted multivariate multinomial logistic regression models to cross-sectional data (n = 1374) collected from Upper West Region of Ghana. The analysis showed that approximately 28% of respondents reported ever testing for HBV. Although source of healthcare influenced HBV testing, traders (RRR = 0.29, p ≤ 0.001) and farmers (RRR = 0.34, p ≤ 0.01) were significantly less likely to test voluntarily. Wealth generally predicted voluntary testing, although less so for mandatory testing. The findings highlight the need for free HBV services targeting the very poor, especially those who use community-level health facilities as their primary source of care.

Ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis Prevention among Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Findings among a cohort of 26 patients who had hematologic malignancies and hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection support that HEV can induce chronic hepatitis. However, a 3-month course of ribavirin can induce a rapid viral clearance, reducing the risk for chronic hepatitis and enabling continuation of cytotoxic treatments for underlying malignancies.

[Hepatitis E--overview of the latest knowledge]. / Hepatitida E--prehled soucasných poznatku.

Hepatitis E (HE) is a ubiquitous infection, occurring both in developing and in developed countries. It is caused by the hepatitis E virus (HEV), a small, non-enveloped RNA virus. The reported incidence in the Czech Republic in 2013 was 2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants and the number of HE cases has been growing over the past years. Besides the long known fecal-oral transmission, zoonotic and blood product transmission of HEV has recently been observed in industrialized countries. Most infections are asymptomatic. Symptomatic infection may present as acute hepatitis with nonspecific flu-like symptoms and liver enzymes elevation. In immunocompromised patients, HEV can lead to chronic hepatitis E and can even cause acute liver failure in pregnant women. Several extrahepatic manifestations have also been reported. Antiviral therapy has been successfully used in chronic hepatitis E. The first vaccine available for clinical use is licensed in China so far.

Challenges of infectious diseases in the USA.

In the USA, infectious diseases continue to exact a substantial toll on health and health-care resources. Endemic diseases such as chronic hepatitis, HIV, and other sexually transmitted infections affect millions of individuals and widen health disparities. Additional concerns include health-care-associated and foodborne infections--both of which have been targets of broad prevention efforts, with success in some areas, yet major challenges remain. Although substantial progress in reduction of the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases has been made, continued cases and outbreaks of these diseases persist, driven by various contributing factors. Worldwide, emerging and reemerging infections continue to challenge prevention and control strategies while the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance needs urgent action. An important priority for control of infectious disease is to ensure that scientific and technological advances in molecular diagnostics and bioinformatics are well integrated into public health. Broad and diverse partnerships across governments, health care, academia, and industry, and with the public, are essential to effectively reduce the burden of infectious diseases.

Chronic hepatitis E: a review of the literature.

In 1978, the first case of hepatitis E was identified as non-A, non-B hepatitis. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is believed to be one of the common causes of enterically transmitted acute hepatitis in developing countries and is rare in developed countries, except in patients with a history of travel. However, an increasing number of chronic HEV infection cases have recently been reported in developed countries. In these countries, immunosuppressed patients with HEV infection, such as organ transplant recipients, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients or patients with haematological malignancies, could develop chronic hepatitis E (CHE) infection. Approximately 60% of HEV infections in immunocompromised patients after solid organ transplantation evolve to CHE without antiviral treatment. Clinical manifestations of CHE are often nonspecific symptoms. Many patients with CHE infection are asymptomatic, but some have jaundice, fatigue, abdominal pain, fever and asthenia. Several extrahepatic manifestations have also been reported. Although chronic HEV infection can result in progressive severe liver failure and cirrhosis, diagnosis is often controversial because of the lack of specific diagnostic criteria. Many CHE cases are diagnosed by HEV RNA-positive serum or stool for >6 months. Immunosuppressive drugs, interferon-alpha and ribavirin have been used for treatment. Diagnostic reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction is useful for estimating treatment efficacy. Preventive measures for HEV infection have been discussed, while systematic guidelines have not yet been reported.

Hepatitis E virus: new faces of an old infection.

Hepatitis E virus is one of the most common causes of acute hepatitis worldwide, with the majority of cases occurring in Asia. In recent years, however, an increasing number of acute and chronic hepatitis E virus infections have been reported in industrialized countries. The importance of this infection resides in the associated morbidity and mortality. In acute cases, a high mortality rate has been reported in patients with previously undiagnosed alcoholic liver disease. Hepatitis E infection can become chronic in immunocompromised patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients, patients receiving chemotherapy, and HIV-infected patients, and lead to the development of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. Hence, treatment strategies involving reductions in immunosuppressive regimens and therapy with ribavirin or peg-interferon have been evaluated. In terms of prevention, a promising new vaccine was recently licensed in China, although its efficacy is uncertain and potential adverse effects in risk groups such as chronic liver disease patients and pregnant women require investigation. In conclusion, physicians should be aware of hepatitis E as a cause of both acute and chronic hepatitis in immunocompromised patients. The best treatment option for HEV infection remains to be defined, but both ribavirin and peg-interferon may have a role in therapy for this condition.

Chronic hepatitis E infection: risks and controls.

Very recently, an unusual clinical presentation with an altered natural history associated with hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has emerged in high-income industrialized nations. Although HEV infection does not develop into chronicity in general, viremia can persist for long periods of time in immunocompromised solid organ, bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients. Conceivably, the atypical clinical and virological outcomes in these cases could be related to immunosuppressive chemotherapy, resulting in suboptimal HEV-specific immune responses. In the absence of travel to endemic regions, foodborne autochthonous HEV infection due to viral genotypes 3 and 4 has been implicated in the chronic cases. Presently, pegIFN-α-2a and ribavirin, the commonly used drugs to treat chronic viral hepatitis, are proving very promising in hepatitis E patients. Nevertheless, the most-awaited HEV vaccine could be protective in naïve travelers or high-risk group populations. The mechanisms of establishing chronic HEV infection and the disease severity have hitherto not been clearly understood. Therefore, a comprehensive clinical, virological and molecular study is needed to understand and control the disease.

Anti-hepatitis A seroprevalence among chronic viral hepatitis patients in Kelantan, Malaysia.

AIM: To determine the seroprevalence of anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and to justify the need for hepatitis A vaccination. METHODS: Patients (n = 119) were enrolled between July and September 2009. The diagnosis of CLD was based on the presence of viral markers for more than 6 mo. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was based on clinical, biochemical and radiological profiles. Patient serum was tested for anti-HAV IgG. RESULTS: The overall anti-HAV seroprevalence was 88.2%. The aetiology of CLD was hepatitis B in 96 patients (80.7%) and hepatitis C in 23 patients (19.3%). Mean age was 44.4 ± 14 years. Patients were grouped according to age as follows: 24 (20.2%) patients in the 21-30 years age group, 22 (18.5%) in the 31-40 years age group, 31 (26.1%) in the 41-50 years age group, 23 (19.3%) in the 51-60 years age group and 19 (16.0%) patients aged greater than 60 years, with reported seroprevalences of 66.7%, 95.5%, 93.5%, 91.3% and 94.7%, respectively. There was a marked increase of seroprevalence in subjects older than 30 years (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that patients aged greater than 30 years of age were likely to have natural immunity to hepatitis A. Therefore, hepatitis A vaccination may not be routinely required in this age group.

Prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Chronic hepatitis B or C can cause severe liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Both viral infections together especially hepatitis c virus infection (HCV) are the mayor indication for liver transplantation in Western Europe and the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) or HCV infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) plays a key role for the outcome after liver transplantation concerning patient and graft survival rates. Allograft dysfunctions, cirrhosis of the allograft and graft failure are major complications after recurrent viral hepatitis. The survival after liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease changed dramatically during the last two decades with results today comparable with non-HBV-related liver transplantations. Availability of immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) as well as nucleoside/nucleotide analogues like lamivudine or adefovir in the pre- and post-transplant setting conferred to significant better results due to an efficient prophylaxis and the possibility of therapy of HBV reinfection of the allograft. New drugs such as entecavir, tenofovir and telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infections may offer even more opportunities in the transplant setting. In contrast, despite recent achievements in the treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferons and ribavirin, patients with HCV cirrhosis or after liver transplantation are difficult to treat. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in prophylactic and therapeutic approaches of HCV reinfection after OLT are only low compared to the pre-cirrhotic HCV infection. Moreover, best treatment duration and dosage of recurrent HCV infection with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin remains to be defined.

Long-term protection against HBV chronic carriage of Gambian adolescents vaccinated in infancy and immune response in HBV booster trial in adolescence.

BACKGROUND: Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) arising in childhood is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in adult life. Between 1986 and 1990, approximately 120,000 Gambian newborns were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of infant HBV vaccination on the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in adulthood. These children are now in adolescence and approaching adulthood, when the onset of sexual activity may challenge their hepatitis B immunity. Thus a booster dose in adolescence could be important to maintain long-term protection. METHODS: Fifteen years after the start of the HBV infant vaccination study, 492 vaccinated and 424 unvaccinated children were identified to determine vaccine efficacy against infection and carriage in adolescence. At the same time, 297 of the 492 infant-vaccinated subjects were randomly offered a booster dose of HBV vaccine. Anti-HBs was measured before the booster, and two weeks and 1 year afterwards (ISRCTN71271385). RESULTS: Vaccine efficacy 15 years after vaccination was 67.0% against infection as manifest by anti-HBc positivity (95% CI 58.2-74.6%), and 96.6% against HBsAg carriage (95% CI 91.5-100%). 31.2% of participants had detectable anti-HBs with a GMC of 32 IU/l. For 168 boosted participants GMC anti-HBs responses were 38 IU/l prior to vaccination, 524 IU/l two weeks after boosting, and 101 IU/l after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: HBV vaccination in infants confers very good protection against carriage up to 15 years of age, although a large proportion of vaccinated subjects did not have detectable anti-HBs at this age. The response to boosting persisted for at least a year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN71271385.

Hepatoprotective activity of Psidium guajava Linn. leaf extract.

The study was designed to evaluate the hepatoprotective activity of P. guajava in acute experimental liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride, paracetamol or thioacetamide and chronic liver damage induced by carbon tetrachloride. The effects observed were compared with a known hepatoprotective agent, silymarin. In the acute liver damage induced by different hepatotoxins, P. guajava leaf extracts (250 and 500mg/kg, po) significantly reduced the elevated serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. The higher dose of the extract (500 mg/kg, po) prevented the increase in liver weight when compared to hepatoxin treated control, while the lower dose was ineffective except in the paracetamol induced liver damage. In the chronic liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride, the higher dose (500 mg/kg, po) of P. guajava leaf extract was found to be more effective than the lower dose (250 mg/kg, po). Histological examination of the liver tissues supported the hepatoprotection. It is concluded that the aqueous extract of leaves of guava plant possesses good hepatoprotective activity.

Estudio multicéntrico sobre prevalencia de las coinfecciones por virus de hepatitis, indicación de tratamiento de hepatitis crónica C y necesidad de trasplante hepático en pacientes infectados por el VIH en España. Estudio GESIDA 29/02-FIPSE 12185/01 / Prevalences of hepatitis virus coinfection and indications for chronic hepatitis C virus treatment and liver transplantation in Spanish HIV-infected patients. The GESIDA 29/02 and FIPSE 12185/01 Multicenter Study

Introducción. Los objetivos del estudio son estimar la prevalencia de las coinfecciones por virus de la hepatitis en la población española infectada por el VIH y determinar el porcentaje de pacientes candidatos a tratamiento de la hepatitis C crónica (HCC) y a trasplante hepático dentro de esta población. Métodos. Estudio transversal de dos poblaciones de pacientes infectados por el VIH realizado en el año 2002: 1.260 pacientes de la población de 39 centros de toda la geografía española (P1) y 1.560 pacientes de la de tres hospitales de tercer nivel de Madrid (P2). Resultados. La prevalencia sérica de virus de las hepatitis A (VHA), B (VHB) y HCC encontrada respectivamente en P1 y P2. IgG anti-VHA1: 74% y 78%. HBsAg1: 4,9 y 4,8%. HBsAg­, anti-HBc1, anti-HBs1: 39 y 39%. HBsAg­, anti-HBc1, anti-HBs­: 25 y 31%. HBsAg­, anti-HBc­, anti-HBs1: 7 y 8%. HBsAg­, anti-HBc­, anti-HBs­: 22 y 16%. Anti-VHC1: 61 y 65%. Entre estos 88,8 y 84,6% tenían una PCR VHC1. Coinfección múltiple por virus de la hepatitis 3,2 y 2,8% y de estos, 70 y 78% con coinfección por el VHB, el VHC y el VHD. Cirrosis hepática el 5,8 y 9,6% de los pacientes coinfectados por el VIH y el VHC, con indicación de considerar trasplante hepático aproximadamente en uno de cada seis. El 43 y 37% de los coinfectados por el VHC eran buenos candidatos a tratamiento de HCC, pero sólo el 14 y el 15% lo habían iniciado. Conclusiones. Un elevado porcentaje de pacientes infectados por el VIH en España están coinfectados por virus de hepatitis, especialmente por el tipo C (VHC). El número de posibles candidatos a trasplante hepático es elevado y puede aumentar en los próximos años. En el futuro será necesario un mayor esfuerzo de tratamiento en los pacientes coinfectados por el VIH y virus de hepatitis (AU)

Introduction. The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of HIV and hepatitis virus coinfection in the Spanish population and to determine the percentage of patients who are candidates for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment and liver transplantation within this population. Methods. A cross-sectional study was performed in 2002 in two Spanish populations of HIV-infected patients: 1,260 patients from 39 centers throughout Spain (P1) and 1,560 patients from three tertiary teaching hospitals in Madrid (P2).Results. The following hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV serological prevalence were found in the P1 and P2 groups, respectively: HAV-IgG antibodies: 74% and 78%; HBsAg1: 4.9% and 4.8%; HBsAg­, anti-HBc1, anti-HBs1: 39% and 39%; HBsAg­, anti-HBc1, anti-HBs­: 25% and 31%; HBsAg­, anti-HBc­, anti-HBs1: 7% and 8%; HBsAg­, anti-HBc­, anti-HBs­: 22% and 16%. Anti-HCV1: 61% and 65%, respectively. Of the patients with positive HCV serology, 88.8% and 84.6% of each group were positive for HCV-RNA by polymerase chain reaction. Multiple coinfections with hepatitis viruses were found in 3.2% and 2.8%, respectively; of these, 70% and 78% had coinfection with HBV, HCV and HDV. Liver cirrhosis was found in 5.8% and 9.6% of the patients coinfected with HIV and HCV, respectively. Liver transplant was indicated in approximately one out of every six coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis. The 43 and 37% of the HCV coinfected patients were good candidates for anti-HCV treatment, but only 14% and 15% of patients had initiated it. Conclusions. A high percentage of HIV-infected patients in Spain were coinfected with hepatitis viruses, especially HCV. The number of possible candidates for liver transplantation is rising and could increase in the next few years. In the future, greater efforts to treat HIV-and hepatitis virus-coinfected patients will be required (AU)

[Use of amixin in the therapy and prevention of some viral infections]. / Opyt primeneniia amiksina pri lechenii i profilaktike nekotorykh virusnykh infektsionnykh zabolevanii.

The trial of oral interferon inductor amixin for effectiveness in chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) has shown that amixin in CVH improved general condition of the patients, removed yellowness of the skin and sclera, normalized activity of aminotransferases and blood bilirubin level. Virus replication was stopped in 25 and 1.6% in CVHB and CVGC, respectively. Amixin in HFRS was effective if received early. Preventive amixin therapy in population groups with high HFRS risk prevents development of HFRS and acute respiratory viral infection.