Routine Childhood Vaccines Given From 1 through 18 Years of Age.

In addition to the vaccines due in the first year of life, the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that children continue to receive vaccines regularly against a variety of infectious diseases. Starting at 12 to 15 months of life, these include the two-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccine series and the two-dose varicella vaccine series. Also in the second year of life, infants should begin the two-dose hepatitis A vaccine series and complete the Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine series as well as the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine series. Before 19 months of life, infants should receive the third dose of the poliovirus vaccine and the fourth dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. The final doses of poliovirus and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccines are both due at 4 to 6 years of life. Before each influenza season, every child should receive the influenza vaccine. Those less than 9 years of age who previously received less than two doses need two doses a month apart. At 11 to 12 years of life, all should get two doses of the human papillomavirus vaccine, the adolescent/adult version of the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine, and begin a two-dose series of meningococcal ACWY vaccine. Each of these vaccines is due when the vaccine works to protect against both an immediate risk as well as to provide long-term protection. Each vaccine-preventable disease varies in terms of the nature of exposure, the form of the morbidity, the risk of mortality, and potential to prevent or ameliorate its harm.

Establishment of detection antibodies BRRs batch 5 for in vitro potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines by ELISA.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) standard ELISA method for determination of antigen content of hepatitis A vaccines (HAV) requires specific coating and detection Biological Reference Reagents (BRRs). The 4th batch of detection antibodies BRRs was established in 2017 for use in conjunction with the Ph. Eur. General Chapter 2.7.14 Assay of hepatitis A vaccine. Stocks of these BRRs were running low and therefore the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) organised a collaborative study to qualify replacement batches. The candidate BRR antibodies batch 5 were prepared under appropriate conditions from starting materials similar to previous batches to ensure continuity. Prior to the study, a low level of detection was obtained with new batches of the HRPO-GAM provided by the established supplier, supposedly due to a manufacturing issue in the conjugation step. Several other batches procured from the same supplier were tested without any success. Consequently HRPO-GAM batches from 3 other suppliers were tested and one batch was chosen to be included as a BRR based on its suitable characteristics. During the collaborative study, the new batches of antibodies were compared to previous batches of BRRs. Results confirmed that they were suitable to be used for the intended purpose, and could be used at the same final concentrations as the previous batch, i.e. 1:500 for the primary antibody and 1:400 for the conjugated secondary antibody. A higher background OD than in previous batches was observed, so it is recommended to subtract the background from the OD values obtained in the test in order to plot the sigmoid curve and calculate the titre of test samples. Moreover it is recommended that the first dilutions used for the IS and BRP2 should be 1:2 and 1:20, respectively, in order to achieve the same ODmax as for the previous BRRs batches. The BRRs were adopted by correspondence in October 2018 by the Ph. Eur. Commission and are presented as a set containing Hepatitis A virus primary detection antibody BRR batch 5 and Conjugated secondary detection antibody BRR batch 5. They are available from the EDQM as Hepatitis A vaccine ELISA detection antibodies set BRR batch 5.

Establishment of detection antibodies BRRs batch 4 for in vitro potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines by ELISA.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) standard ELISA method for determination of antigen content of hepatitis A vaccines (HAV) requires specific coating and detection Biological Reference Reagents (BRRs). The 3rd batch of detection antibodies BRRs was established in 2015 for use in conjunction with the Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 'Assay of hepatitis A vaccine'. Stocks of these BRRs were running low and therefore the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) organised a collaborative study to qualify replacement batches. The candidate BRR antibodies batch 4 were prepared under appropriate conditions from starting materials similar to previous batches to ensure continuity. During the collaborative study, the new batches of antibodies were compared to previous batches of BRRs. Results confirmed that they were suitable to be used for the intended purpose, and could be used at the same final concentrations as the previous batch, i.e. 1:500 for the primary antibody and 1:400 for the conjugated secondary antibody. They were adopted in June 2017 by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Hepatitis A virus primary detection antibody BRR batch 4 and Conjugated secondary detection antibody BRR batch 4, respectively. They are available from the EDQM as Hepatitis A vaccine ELISA detection antibodies set BRR batch 4.

Establishing the 1st Chinese National Standard for inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.

A reference standard calibrated in the International Units is needed for the quality control of hepatitis A vaccine. Thus, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control launched a project to establish a non-adsorbed inactivated hepatitis A vaccine reference as the working standard calibrated against the 1st International Standard (IS). Two national standard candidates (NSCs) were obtained from two manufacturers, and designated as NSC A (lyophilized form) and NSC B (liquid form). Six laboratories participated in the collaborative study and were asked to use their in-house validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods to detect hepatitis A vaccine antigen content. Although both exhibited good parallelism and linear relationship with IS, NSC B showed a better agreement among laboratories than NSC A. And based on suitability of the candidates, NSC B was selected. The accelerated degradation study showed that NSC B was stable at the storage temperature (≤-70 °C). Therefore NSC B was approved as the first Chinese national antigen standard for inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, with an assigned antigen content of 70 IU/ml.

Establishment of hepatitis A vaccine (inactivated, non-adsorbed) BRP batches 2 and 3.

The current hepatitis A vaccine (HAV), inactivated, non-adsorbed, European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) is used for the in vitro potency assay of HAV as prescribed by the Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 Assay of hepatitis A vaccine. This reference preparation was calibrated in 2008 through an international collaborative study and was assigned a potency of 12 IU/mL. During use of this BRP it appeared to be inapplicable in certain cases due to a low nominal antigen content. Consequently, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) established replacement batches for this BRP, calibrated against the 1(st) WHO International Standard (IS) for HAV (inactivated), using the standard in vitro ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) method validated previously. The results of the study showed that the candidate BRPs were suitable for the intended purpose, and following completion of the study, they were adopted in November 2014 by the Ph. Eur. Commission as HAV (inactivated, non-adsorbed) BRP batches 2 and 3, with an assigned potency of 1350 IU/mL, for in vitro antigen content determination by ELISA. As the amount of material in each vial largely exceeds the amount required for the performance of a single assay, the BRPs are to be aliquoted by users as single-use aliquots and refrozen below -50 °C prior to their use as reference preparations.

Establishment of hepatitis A detection antibodies set BRR batch 3 for antigen content determination by ELISA.

The current batch of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Reagents (BRRs) used for the in vitro potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines (HAV) by ELISA (enzymelinked immunosorbent assay) was established in 2012 for use in conjunction with Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 Assay of hepatitis A vaccine. It is composed of a coating reagent and a set of detection antibodies. As stocks of the latter are running low, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) organised a collaborative study to qualify replacement batches. The candidate BRR antibodies (primary monoclonal antibody and labelled secondary antibody) were prepared under appropriate conditions from starting materials similar to those used for the current batches. The new batches of antibodies were tested alongside previous batches of BRRs to ensure continuity, and the results confirmed that they were suitable for use in the potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines by ELISA using the standard method referenced in Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 at the same final concentrations as the previous batches, i.e. 1:500 for the primary monoclonal antibody and 1:400 for the secondary conjugated antibody. The outcome of the study allowed their establishment by the Ph. Eur. Commission in March 2015 as anti-hepatitis A virus primary detection antibody BRR batch 3 and conjugated secondary detection antibody BRR batch 3 respectively. They are available from the EDQM as hepatitis A vaccine ELISA detection antibodies set BRR batch 3.

WHO position paper on hepatitis A vaccines: June 2012-recommendations.

This article presents the World Health Organizations (WHO) recommendations onthe use of hepatitis A vaccine excerpted from the WHO position paper on hepatitis A vaccines - June 2012 recently published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record [1]. The current document replaces the position paper on the use of hepatitis A vaccines published in 2000 [2] and incorporates the most recent developments in the field with particular consideration to changes in the epidemiological features of hepatitis A infection in several countries, increased supply of hepatitis A vaccines, and new evidence on their public health benefits. Footnotes to this paper provide a number of core references including references to grading tables that assess the quality of scientific evidence for a few key conclusions. In accordance with its mandate to provide guidance to Member States on health policy matters, WHO issues a series of regularly updated position papers on vaccines and combinations of vaccines against diseases that have an international public health impact. These papers are concerned primarily with the use of vaccines in large-scale immunization programmes; they summarize essential background information on diseases and vaccines, and conclude with WHO's current position on the use of vaccines in the global context. This paper reflects the recommendations of WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization. These recommendations were discussed by SAGE at its November 2011 and April 2012 meetings. Evidence presented at these meetings can be accessed at http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/previous/en/index.html.

Contributions from the systematic review of economic evaluations: the case of childhood hepatitis A vaccination in Brazil.

The aim of this study was to present the contributions of the systematic review of economic evaluations to the development of a national study on childhood hepatitis A vaccination. A literature review was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, WOPEC, HealthSTAR, SciELO and LILACS from 1995 to 2010. Most of the studies (8 of 10) showed favorable cost-effectiveness results. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the most important parameters for the results were cost of the vaccine, hepatitis A incidence, and medical costs of the disease. Variability was observed in methodological characteristics and estimates of key variables among the 10 studies reviewed. It is not possible to generalize results or transfer epidemiological estimates of resource utilization and costs associated with hepatitis A to the local context. Systematic review of economic evaluation studies of hepatitis A vaccine demonstrated the need for a national analysis and provided input for the development of a new decision-making model for Brazil.

Contributions from the systematic review of economic evaluations: the case of childhood hepatitis A vaccination in Brazil / Contribuições da revisão sistemática de avaliações econômicas: o exemplo da vacinação infantil contra hepatite A no Brasil

The aim of this study was to present the contributions of the systematic review of economic evaluations to the development of a national study on childhood hepatitis A vaccination. A literature review was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, WOPEC, HealthSTAR, SciELO and LILACS from 1995 to 2010. Most of the studies (8 of 10) showed favorable cost-effectiveness results. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the most important parameters for the results were cost of the vaccine, hepatitis A incidence, and medical costs of the disease. Variability was observed in methodological characteristics and estimates of key variables among the 10 studies reviewed. It is not possible to generalize results or transfer epidemiological estimates of resource utilization and costs associated with hepatitis A to the local context. Systematic review of economic evaluation studies of hepatitis A vaccine demonstrated the need for a national analysis and provided input for the development of a new decision-making model for Brazil.

O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar as contribuições da revisão sistemática de avaliações econômicas para o desenvolvimento de um estudo nacional, o caso da vacinação infantil contra hepatite A. Foi realizada revisão da literatura nas bases de dados EMBASE, MEDLINE, WOPEC, HealthSTAR, SciELO e LILACS, no período de 1995 a 2010. A maioria dos estudos (8 em 10) mostrou resultados favoráveis de custo-efetividade. As análises de sensibilidade indicaram como parâmetros mais importantes para os resultados os custos da vacina, incidência de hepatite A e custos médicos da doença. Foi observada variabilidade nas características metodológicas e estimativas de variáveis-chaves dos 10 estudos revisados. Não é possível generalização dos resultados e transferibilidade de estimativas epidemiológicas, de usos de recursos e custos associados à hepatite A para o contexto local. A revisão sistemática dos estudos de avaliação econômica da vacina contra hepatite A demonstrou a necessidade de uma análise nacional e forneceu elementos para o desenvolvimento de um novo modelo de decisão para o Brasil.

The establishment of a highly sensitive ELISA for detecting bovine serum albumin (BSA) based on a specific pair of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and its application in vaccine quality control.

A highly sensitive sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantifying BSA was established, based on two mAbs that recognize different epitopes on a BSA molecule. Our ELISA system was used to detect BSA concentrations in several vaccines, such as the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine, hepatitis A vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccine. Moreover, we compared the mAb ELISA and the present pAb ELISA by detecting BSA standards and bovine serum samples. The results showed that our ELISA system was in good accordance with the pAb ELISA system. A pair of mAbs (FMU-BSA NO.6 and FMU-BSA NO.11) from 11 murine hybridomas secreting BSA-specific mAbs was selected for the development of the sandwich ELISA. The detection limit of this quantitative assay reaches 0.38 µg/L, which is 10-fold more sensitive than those previously reported. The quantitative range of BSA concentration is from 0.5 to 40 µg/L, which is comparable to the currently used polyclonal antibody (pAb) ELISA. Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient variations are both lower than 10% at the three concentrations used (10, 20, and 40 µg/L). Thus, the mAb sandwich ELISA developed herein may provide a stable, precise, and highly sensitive method for quantifying BSA, which is very useful in the quality control of some vaccines.

Establishment of a biological reference preparation for hepatitis A vaccine (inactivated, non-adsorbed).

A reference standard calibrated in International Units (IU) is needed for the in vitro potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines prepared by formalin-inactivation of purified hepatitis A virus grown in cell cultures. Thus, a project was launched by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) to establish one or more non-adsorbed inactivated hepatitis A vaccine reference preparation(s) as working standard(s), calibrated against the 1st International Standard (IS), for the in vitro potency assay (ELISA) of all vaccines present on the European market. Four non-adsorbed liquid preparations of formalin-inactivated hepatitis A antigen with a known antigen content were obtained from 3 manufacturers as candidate Biological Reference Preparations (BRPs). Thirteen laboratories participated in the collaborative study. They were asked to use an in vitro ELISA method adapted from a commercially available kit for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis A virus. In-house validated assays were to be run in parallel, where available. Some participants also included commercially available hepatitis A vaccines in the assays, after appropriate desorption. During the collaborative study, several participants using the standard method were faced with problems with some of the most recent lots of the test kits. Due to these problems, the standard method did not perform satisfactorily and a high number of assays were invalid, whereas the in-house methods appeared to perform better. Despite this, the overall mean results of the valid assays using both methods were in agreement. Nonetheless, it was decided to base the assignment of the potency values on the in-house methods only. The results showed that all candidate BRPs were suitable for the intended purpose. However, based on availability of the material and on the results of end-product testing, 2 candidate reference preparations, Samples C and D, were selected. Both were from the same batch but filled on different days; no statistically significant difference in potency was observed. They were thus combined in 1 single batch. The candidate preparation (Sample C/D) was adopted at the June 2009 session of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Commission as the Ph. Eur. BRP batch 1 for hepatitis A vaccine (inactivated, non-adsorbed), with an assigned potency of 12 IU/ml for in vitro antigen content assays. Accelerated degradation studies have been initiated. The preliminary data show that the BRP is stable at the recommended storage temperature (< -50 degrees C). The BRP will be monitored at regular intervals throughout its lifetime.

Would an in vitro ELISA test be a suitable alternative potency method to the in vivo immunogenicity assay commonly used in the context of international Hepatitis A vaccines batch release?

Since many years Afssaps applies the 3R's strategy (replacement, reduction and refinement) for the use of laboratory animal testing in the framework of vaccine batch release. In this context, for Hepatitis A vaccines, a study was carried out to assess the feasibility of replacing the in vivo "Gold Standard" potency assay by the Afssaps' validated in-house antigen content in vitro assay on routine testing. The use of a panel of potent vaccine batches and reduced-potency samples by heating demonstrated a correlation between the two methods. This encourages Afssaps to progressively switch from in vivo to in vitro assay in the framework of Hepatitis A vaccines batch release.

Virosomal hepatitis a vaccine: comparing intradermal and subcutaneous with intramuscular administration.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is unaffordable to many developing countries. Substantial reductions in cost occur when vaccines are administered intradermally at low doses. Aluminum-free HAV vaccines are considered more suitable for intradermal use than traditional vaccines which can cause long-lasting local reactions. Thus, we compared the immunogenicity and safety of an aluminum-free virosomal HAV vaccine (Epaxal) administered by different routes: intradermal (i.d.), subcutaneous (s.c.), and intramuscular (i.m.). METHODS: Two open pilot studies were conducted as sub-studies of a large lot consistency trial. Healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 were enrolled. Study 1 compared two i.d. regimens of a lower dose of Epaxal [0.1 mL (4.8 IU), one or two injection sites] with i.m. administration of the standard dose [0.5 mL (24 IU)]. Study 2 compared the s.c. with the i.m. administration of the standard dose. At month 12, subjects in study 1 received a booster dose of 0.1 mL i.d. or 0.5 mL i.m.; subjects in study 2 received 0.5 mL via the respective route (s.c. or i.m.). Serum was tested for antibodies at baseline, 2 weeks (study 1), and 1 and 6 months after the primary vaccination as well as prior and 1 month after the booster dose. Incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Seroprotection rates (anti-HAV geometric mean concentration of > or =20 mIU/mL) after 1 month ranged from 93.2% to 100% in all groups and remained high until month 12 (range 85.2&-90.2%). Complete (100%) seroprotection was achieved by all subjects in all groups after booster vaccination. All routes of administration were well tolerated. Local reactions were more common in subjects vaccinated i.d. and s.c. than i.m. CONCLUSIONS: The aluminum-free virosomal HAV vaccine Epaxal is highly immunogenic and well tolerated when administered either via i.d., s.c., or i.m. Vaccination via the i.d. route may confer significant cost savings over the conventional i.m. route.

Acute hepatitis A in a young returning traveler from Kenya despite immunization before departure.

Aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccines are known to be highly efficient. We present here the case of a patient who was immunized against hepatitis A before leaving for Kenya and who contracted an acute symptomatic hepatitis A during travel.

Hepatitis A vaccines.

The global disease burden associated with hepatitis A virus (HAV) is expected to increase in the coming years due to a shift in the epidemiological pattern of the disease. A decrease in the prevalence of natural immunity is leading to an increased number of adolescents and adults susceptible to a disease that is associated with greater morbidity, mortality and treatment costs in older-age groups. Current HAV vaccines have been shown to be safe, highly immunogenic and confer long-lasting protection against HAV disease. Vaccine-induced antibodies persist for more than 12 years in vaccinated adults and mathematical modeling predicts antibody persistence for more than 25 years in over 95% of vaccine recipients. However, the cost of HAV vaccines has been prohibitive for some countries. Recent studies in countries with transitioning HAV endemicity indicate that the cost-benefit ratio of mass vaccination against HAV would be similar to other routine childhood vaccinations.

Immunogenicity and safety of three consecutive lots of a new preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive): a double-blind, randomized and controlled trial.

Immunization is considered as the most effective way for the prophylaxis of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of three consecutive lots of a new preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (Healive) in healthy children. A double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted in healthy volunteers aged from 1 to 8 years. Total 400 subjects were enrolled and assigned into four groups, receiving one of the three lots of Healive or an established control vaccine. The vaccination was two-dose regimen with 6 months apart. Anti-HAV titers were determined at the 1st, 6th and 7th month. The results showed that Healive was highly immunogenic in children with 100% seroconversion rate (SR) and 3237-3814 mIU/ml geometry mean titer (GMT) 1 month after the second dose. The immunogenicity of Healive was statistically higher than that of the control vaccine with respect to GMT and SR (P=0.037 to P<0.001). Both Healive and control vaccine were well tolerated with 1-5% incidence of overall adverse reactions (P>0.298). Severe adverse reaction was not reported. Both SRs (1, 6 and 7 months) and GMTs (1 and 7 months) in subjects receiving one of the three consecutive lots of Healive had not statistical difference (P=0.114-0.710), suggesting that Healive was well consistent. The immune responses in younger children (1-3 years) and older children (4-8 years) were similar to each other (P=0.187-0.963). The present study indicated that Healive was greatly consistent between production lots, well tolerated and highly immunogenic in children, which made the preservative-free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine well suitable for inclusion in the routine programme of children vaccination.

Safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine in children with chronic liver disease.

AIM: To study the safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) in children with chronic liver disease of various etiologies. METHODS: Eleven children with chronic liver disease and thirteen age- and sex-matched controls negative for HAV antibodies were vaccinated against hepatitis A after they gave their informed consent. Children with uncontrolled coagulopathy or signs of hepatic decompensation were excluded. The vaccine (Havrix: 720 ELISA units in 0.5 mL, from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) was given intramuscularly in the deltoid in 2 doses 6 mo apart. Children were tested for HAV antibodies one and six months after the 1st dose and one month after the 2nd dose. Total serum bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were determined immediately before and after one month of the 1st dose of the vaccine. RESULTS: Only 7 out of the 11 patients were positive for HAV antibodies after the 1st dose of the vaccine, as compared to 100% of the controls. One month after the 2nd dose, all patients tested were positive for HAV antibodies. No deterioration in liver functions of patients was noted after vaccination. No adverse events, immediate or late, were reported by the mothers after each dose of the vaccine. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis A vaccine is both safe and effective in this small studied group of children with chronic liver disease. Given the high seroconversion rate, post-vaccination testing for HAV antibodies is not needed.

Hepatitis A vaccines and the elderly.

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) exposure in unprotected adults may cause severe and serious symptoms, with risk of both morbidity and mortality increasing with age. As seroprevalence of HAV is low in industrialised countries, and an increasing number of people, with an increasing median age, travel from areas of low HAV endemicity to high endemicity, pre-travel vaccination is warranted. Vaccination of the elderly against HAV, however, may be associated with reduced seroprotection, since the immune response decreases with age. Studies with monovalent hepatitis A vaccine or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine show good efficacy in adults in general. Few studies have assessed the immune response in older adults. The only prospective study with monovalent hepatitis A vaccine in the elderly showed a reduced seroprotection of approximately 65% after a single primary dose in subjects over the age of 50 years, while seroprotection was 98% in this age group after receiving a booster dose. The only prospective study with combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in younger subjects or older than 40 years showed similar seroprotection (99-100%) against HAV compared to a monovalent vaccine after receiving three doses. As data on seroprotection for HAV in the elderly are limited, further studies are needed to elucidate how optimal protection in the elderly can be achieved. In the mean time, based on the available data, the suggestion is made to screen elderly travellers to areas endemic for HAV for the presence of naturally acquired immunity, and, if found susceptible, be immunised well in advance of their trip, to allow time for post-vaccination antibody testing and/or administration of a second dose of the vaccine.

Rate, intensity, and duration of local reactions to a virosome-adjuvanted vs. an aluminium-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine in UK travellers.

BACKGROUND: Travellers increasingly require hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine for overseas travel to highly endemic areas. While the inactivated HAV vaccines currently in use are all highly immunogenic, studies have shown the aluminium-free, virosome-adjuvanted vaccine Epaxal to possess a superior local tolerability profile. The objective of this study was to analyse the pattern of local reactions caused by the aluminium-free Epaxal compared with an aluminium-adjuvanted HAV vaccine. METHODS: Subjects recruited from travel health centres were randomised in a 4:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either Epaxal or Havrix vaccine. Vaccinees noted adverse reactions on a 7-day diary card that was returned by mail to the centre. RESULTS: 529 adults (> or =16 years) were vaccinated, and 413 (78.1%) subjects returned diary cards, 338 (76.5%) in the Epaxal group and 75 (86.2%) in the Havrix group. Subjects reported fewer local adverse reactions for Epaxal (23.4% vs. 57.3%; p<0.0001). Injection site pain categorised as Grade 2 (painful on movement) or Grade 3 (spontaneously painful) (4.7% vs. 22.7%, p=0.0001) was less frequent in the Epaxal group and resolved more quickly (> or =3 days of pain, 8.6% vs. 22.7%, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The lower reactogenicity of the virosome-adjuvanted vaccine is an important feature for travellers.