Performance of HCV core antigen and PCR testing in a predominantly genotype 3 population.

Hepatitis C core antigen (HCVcAg) is becoming increasingly recognized as an alternative to molecular testing for the confirmation of chronic hepatitis C. However, there are limited data on the performance of this assay in a genotype 3 (GT3) predominant country like Pakistan. We conducted a study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HCVcAg against the HCV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) molecular test. HCV antibody-positive patients requiring confirmatory testing were recruited from August to October 2018 at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center (PKLI&RC), Lahore, Pakistan. Patients with previously known diagnoses or treatment histories were excluded. The Abbott HCV Ag assay was used for HCVcAg testing. Results ≥3.00 fmol/L were considered positive for HCVcAg. The Abbott RealTime HCV assay was used for PCR testing with a lower detection limit of ≥12 IU/mL. We computed the sensitivity, specificity and correlation of HCVcAg against HCV PCR. A total of 394 patients were recruited. The median age of the patients was 42 years. Most participants were females (51.5%, n = 203), 30.7% (n = 121) had HTN, 10.4% DM (n = 41) and 5% had APRI ≥2. The overall sensitivity was 98.0% and the specificity was 98.6%. The lowest detection limit of cAg was an HCV RNA value of 4657 IU/mL. The levels of cAg were highly correlated with those of HCV RNA by Spearman's rank correlation test (r = 0.935, p < .001). HCVcAg represents a suitable alternative with high sensitivity and specificity compared with HCV PCR in the GT3-predominant population and can be incorporated into algorithms to improve linkage to care.

Hepatitis C community prevalence is over-estimated: a prospective, birth cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus infection is often asymptomatic, and many patients may be unaware they are infected. Community-based, birth cohort screening has been advocated to identify these patients. It has been estimated that 0.7-1% of individuals born between 1965 and 1985 in Ireland are infected. The cost-effectiveness of screening is critically dependent on the population prevalence. AIMS: The aim is to determine the community prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the birth cohort 1965-1985. METHODS: Residual serum samples from blood tests ordered by community general practitioners were anonymised and analysed for the presence of hepatitis C antibody ± antigen. Twelve large general hospitals throughout the country participated. RESULTS: A total of 14,320 samples were tested, 9347 of which were from the birth cohort 1965-1985. Seventy-two samples were positive for hepatitis C antibody of which 12 were positive for hepatitis C antigen (17%). The overall prevalence of hepatitis C antigen in the birth cohort was 0.09%. A higher prevalence (0.39%) was identified in males in two urban areas of Dublin. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis C virus seroprevalence was much lower than previously estimated. The proportion of antibody positive patients with hepatitis C antigen was also lower than expected suggesting the effects of treatment and/or high spontaneous viral clearance. Universal birth cohort screening is unlikely to be cost-effective. Targeted birth cohort screening in high prevalence areas could be considered.

Hepatitis C virus modified sE2F442NYT as an antigen in candidate vaccine facilitates human immune cell activation.

The rational selection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine antigen will aid in the prevention of future chronic liver disease burden and associated healthcare costs. We have previously shown that HCV E2 glycoprotein is not highly immunogenic, and the modification of E2 reduced CD81 binding and displayed altered cytokine and protective immune responses in vitro and in a surrogate mouse model. Here, we compared the influence of a parental and a modified sE2F442NYT glycoprotein region from HCV genotype 1a for the activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-derived dendritic cells (DCs), CD4+T cells, and B cells. Modified sE2F442NYT, when incubated with DCs, induced a higher number of CD86-positive cells. The sE2F442NYT or parental sE2 encapsulated as mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (sE2F442NYT mRNA-LNP) primed DCs co-cultured with autologous CD4+T cells did not induce CD25 or forkhead box P3 expression. PBMC-derived CD4+T cells treated with sE2F442NYT exhibited enhanced signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)1/Stat4 phosphorylation in response to anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation in comparison to parental sE2 treatment and facilitated isotype switching in B cells, leading to the generation of a broader subclass of antibodies. Cells treated with modified sE2F442NYT displayed an increase in activated Stat3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Likewise, PBMC-derived naïve B cells upon in vitro stimulation with sE2F442NYT induced an increased proliferation, Stat3 and ERK activation, and protein kinase B (Akt) suppression. Thus, the modified sE2F442NYT antigen from HCV facilitates improved DC, CD4+T, and B cell activation compared to parental sE2 to better induce a robust protective immune response, supporting its selection as an HCV candidate vaccine antigen for preclinical and clinical HCV vaccine trials.IMPORTANCEThe nature of an enhanced immune response induced by sE2F442NYT will help in the selection of a broad cross-protective antigen from hepatitis C virus genotypes, and the inclusion of relatively conserved sE1 with sE2F442NYT may further strengthen the efficacy of the candidate vaccine in evaluating it for human use.

CDC recommendations for hepatitis C testing among perinatally exposed infants and children: United States, 2023

The elimination of hepatitis C is a national priority (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/Viral-Hepatitis-NationalStrategic-Plan-2021-2025.pdf). During 2010­2021, hepatitis C virus (HCV) acute and chronic infections (hereinafter referred to as HCV infections) increased in the United States, consequences of which include cirrhosis, liver cancer, and death. Rates of acute infections more than tripled among reproductive-aged persons during this time (from 0.8 to 2.5 per 100,000 population among persons aged 20­29 years and from 0.6 to 3.5 among persons aged 30­39 years). Because acute HCV infection can lead to chronic infection, this has resulted in increasing rates of HCV infections during pregnancy. Approximately 6%­7% of perinatally exposed (i.e., exposed during pregnancy or delivery) infants and children will acquire HCV infection. Curative direct-acting antiviral therapy is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for persons aged ≥3 years. However, many perinatally infected children are not tested or linked to care. In 2020, because of continued increases in HCV infections in the United States, CDC released universal screening recommendations for adults, which included recommendations for screening for pregnant persons during each pregnancy (Schillie S, Wester C, Osborne M, Wesolowski L, Ryerson AB. CDC recommendations for hepatitis C screening among adults­United States, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep 2020;69[No. RR-2]:1­17). This report introduces four new CDC recommendations: 1) HCV testing of all perinatally exposed infants with a nucleic acid test (NAT) for detection of HCV RNA at age 2­6 months; 2) consultation with a health care provider with expertise in pediatric hepatitis C management for all infants and children with detectable HCV RNA; 3) perinatally exposed infants and children with an undetectable HCV RNA result at or after age 2 months do not require further follow-up unless clinically warranted; and 4) a NAT for HCV RNA is recommended for perinatally exposed infants and children aged 7­17 months who previously have not been tested, and a hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) test followed by a reflex NAT for HCV RNA (when anti-HCV is reactive) is recommended for perinatally exposed children aged ≥18 months who previously have not been tested. Proper identification of perinatally infected children, referral to care, and curative treatment are critical to achieving the goal of hepatitis C elimination.

Evaluation of Quantitative Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen Testing as a Tool for Screening and Confirmation of HCV Infection.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is a common viral infection worldwide. Finding the most effective diagnostic methods with low cost is always needed for laboratory improvement. In this study, we evaluated the performance of a quantitative chemiluminescent hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCV cAg) test by comparing it with the HCV confirmatory antibody line immunoblot assay (HCV Ab-LIA) test as well as the HCV quantitate reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) test. METHODS: A total of 394 samples were enrolled in the retrospective study. Of these, 225 samples were tested using HCV Ab screening and confirmatory Ab-LIA along with chemiluminescent HCV core Ag testing, while 169 samples were tested using qRT-PCR for HCV RNA and chemiluminescent HCV core Ag testing. RESULTS: Out of these, 225 positive samples tested by HCV Ab screening test were analyzed using the confirmatory Ab LIA and HCV cAg assays, a total of 183 samples (81.3 %) were confirmed to be Ab-positive, and among those, 77 samples (42.1%) were also positive for HCV cAg. Thirty-eight samples (20.76%) were HCV Ab indeterminate, and all of them were HCV cAg negative. Four samples (1.8%) were HCV Ab LIA-negative and negative for HCV cAg. Moreover, 169 samples were measured for qRT-PCR HCV viral load and quantitative HCV cAg test. One hundred and three samples were positive for HCV RNA, while 66 were negative. Among the positives, 96/103 samples were HCV cAg positive and 7/103 samples were negative. Out of the negatives, 4/66 samples were HCV cAg positive but 62/66 samples were negative. The HCV cAg results were concordant with the qRT-PCR results in 158 samples (93.5%); however, 11 samples (6.5%) were found to be discrepant. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the quantitative HCV cAg were found to be 93%, 94%, 96%, and 90%, respectively. The overall coefficient of correlation between the HCV RNA levels and HCV cAg data was determined to be r2 = 0.9. CONCLUSIONS: The HCV cAg test showed a high correlation with the HCV RNA levels and may potentially be used as a more cost-effective alternative to the HCV RNA qRT-PCR test.

An amino acid substitution in HCV core antigen limits its use as a reliable measure of HCV infection compared with HCV RNA.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a viral pathogen that causes chronic hepatitis, which can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Detection of HCV RNA is the standard method used to diagnose the disease and monitor antiviral treatment. A quantification assay for the HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) has been proposed as a simplified alternative to the HCV RNA test for predicting active HCV infection, with the aim of achieving the global goal of eliminating hepatitis. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between HCV RNA and HCVcAg, as well as the impact of amino acid sequence heterogeneity on HCVcAg quantification. Our findings demonstrated a strong positive correlation between HCV RNA and HCVcAg across all HCV genotypes (1a, 1b, 3a, and 6), with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 (p < 0.001). However, in some cases, samples with genotypes 3a and 6 exhibited lower HCVcAg levels than expected based on the corresponding HCV RNA values. Upon the core amino acid sequence alignment, it was observed that samples exhibiting low core antigen levels had an amino acid substitution at position 49, where threonine was replaced by either alanine or valine. Core mutation at this position may correlate with one of the epitope regions recognized by anti-HCV monoclonal antibodies. The present findings suggest that the utilization of HCVcAg as a standalone marker for HCV RNA might not provide adequate sensitivity for the detection of HCV infection, especially in cases where there are variations in the amino acid sequence of the core region and a low viral load of HCV RNA.

HCV Core-antigen Assay as an Effective Alternative to HCV RNA Quantification in Patients With Hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) test has been increasingly applied as an effective alternative to conventional molecular tests allowing rapid and affordable diagnosis, which is of paramount relevance to achieve global elimination of HCV infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ARCHITECT® HCV Ag test was evaluated in comparison with HCV RNA quantification test (CAP/CTM) to calculate its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and to determine their correlation level. Its performance, according to low and high viral load values and in different treatment stages [during treatment (T), at the end of the therapeutic protocol (EOT) and when sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated]. RESULTS: In total, 145 samples were included. Considering CAP/CTM, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the HCV-Ag test were 88.9%, 99.1%, 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively, and the correlation among tests was high (r=0.890), with only five discordant results. A decrease in sensitivity was found for low viral load values (<1,000 IU/ml), but the opposite was verified for high viral concentrations (≥1,000 IU/ml). A good agreement was verified for the T and EOT groups (k=0.789 and k=0.638) and an excellent agreement in the SVR group (k=1.000). CONCLUSION: HCV-Ag seems to be an effective alternative that can be routinely combined with other faster and more accessible tests (e.g., HCV antibody tests) for the identification of new HCV infections in suspected patients, eventually reserving the molecular techniques for samples with discordant results.

[Evaluation of the Correlation of HCV Core Antigen Levels with HCV RNA Levels in the Diagnosis and Treatment Follow-up of Hepatitis C Virus Infections]. / Hepatit C Virüs Enfeksiyonlarinin Tani ve Tedavi Izleminde, Hepatit C Virüs Kor Antijen Düzeylerinin Hepatit C Virüs RNA Düzeyleri ile Korelasyonunun Degerlendirilmesi.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are an important public health issue across the world because of the high risk of chronicity potential, impossibility of protection by vaccination and serious complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of HCV core antigen test with HCV RNA in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up and to discuss the status of being an alternative test in routine use. In the first step of the study, the compatibility of the methods was investigated by applying the HCV core antigen test to 600 serum samples from patients with pre diagnosis of HCV infection for whom anti-HCV and HCV RNA tests were routinely studied in the molecular microbiology laboratory of medical microbiology department between December 2016 and December 2018. In the second step, in addition to the routine HCV RNA test, HCV core antigen test was studied in serum samples taken before the start of the treatment, at the eighth week of the treatment and at the end of the treatment of 150 patients whose treatment were decided by the gastroenterology department within this period. The correlation between the two tests was evaluated during the treatment follow-up. Forty-nine of 600 patients were diagnosed according to test results. In 28 patients, HCV core antigen was positive in addition to HCV RNA and anti-HCV which were routinely studied. The sensitivity of HCV core antigen test was 91.49%, specificity was 100%, PPD was 100%, NPD was 97.30%, accuracy was 87.76%. There was a high correlation between HCV RNA and HCV core antigen results. In the second step of the study, sensitivity (96.52%), specificity (95.28%), PPD (95.11%), NPD (95.80%) and accuracy (92.58%) of the HCV core antigen test were determined. These results show that there is a high correlation between the two tests and that HCV core antigen test can be used as an alternative test to HCV RNA test as it is an easily applicable and cost effective test during diagnosis and treatment follow-up.

Diagnostic performance of hepatitis C core antigen assay to identify active infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCVcAg) assay is an alternative for diagnosing HCV infection in a single step. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay's diagnostic performance (validity and utility) for diagnosing active hepatitis C. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until 10 January 2023. The protocol was registered at the prospective international register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022337191). Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay was the test for evaluation, and nucleic acid amplification tests with a cut-off ≤50 IU/mL were the gold standard. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA with the MIDAS module and random-effects models. The bivariate analysis was conducted on 46 studies (18,116 samples). The pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.94-0.97), specificity 0.99 (95% CI = 0.99-1.00), positive likelihood ratio 141.81 (95% CI = 72.39-277.79), and negative likelihood ratio 0.04 (95% CI = 0.03-0.06). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 1.00 (95% CI = 0.34-1.00). For active hepatitis C prevalence values of 0.1%-15%, the probability that a positive test was a true positive was 12%-96%, respectively, indicating that a confirmatory test should be necessary, particularly with a prevalence ≤5%. However, the probability that a negative test was a false negative was close to zero, indicating the absence of HCV infection. The validity (accuracy) of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay for screening active HCV infection in serum/plasma samples was excellent. Although the HCVcAg assay showed limited diagnostic utility in low prevalence settings (≤1%), it might help diagnose hepatitis C in high prevalence scenarios (≥5%).

Longitudinal assessment of HCV core antigen kinetics to monitor therapeutic response in the age of DAAs.

BACKGROUND: In the economy of therapeutic monitoring, an affordable viral marker is essential in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We elucidated the kinetics of HCVcAg to delineate its precise role in monitoring therapeutic response. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 3208 patients were tested for HCV RNA. A total of 423 patients were started on DAAs. Treatment response and kinetics of HCVcAg/RNA were assessed in treatment-naïve (n = 383) and previously treated (n = 40) patients with follow-up for 2 years. RESULTS: After the initiation of DAAs, the rate of relapse was significantly higher in the previously treated group than naive group [12.5% (5/40) Vs 2% (7/383), p<0.0001]. The response rate at RVR was significantly higher with HCVcAg than RNA in both groups (p<0.02). The kinetics of HCVcAg and RNA were significantly different at ETR and SVR12 in the naïve (p<0.04), but similar at all therapeutic points in the previously treated group. The correlation between HCVcAg and RNA was good at baseline, ETR and SVR, except RVR in both groups (r>0.6; p<0.0001). Furthermore, HCV genotypes, treatment regimen, CTP (<7/≥7) and MELD (<15/≥15) did not influence the therapeutic response and the viral replication kinetics (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is the first longitudinal study from India shows that the response rate and kinetics of HCVcAg are comparable to HCV RNA for an extended duration, except at RVR, irrespective of the HCV genotypes, treatment regimen, and liver disease severity. Hence, HCVcAg can be considered as a pragmatic marker to monitor therapeutic response and predict relapse in the era of DAAs.

Diagnostic Performance of the HCV Core Antigen Test To Identify Hepatitis C in HIV-Infected Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The standard algorithm for diagnosing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has two steps, an HCV antibody test for screening and a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for confirmation. However, the HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) detection assay is an alternative for one-step diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay to detect active hepatitis C in serum/plasma in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until 20 September 2022 (PROSPERO, CRD42022348351). We included studies evaluating Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay (index assay) versus NAATs (reference test) in PLWHA coinfected with HCV who did not receive antiviral treatment for HCV. Meta-analysis was performed with the MIDAS module using Stata and random-effects models. The QUADAS-2 tool evaluated the risk of bias. The bivariate analysis was conducted on 11 studies with 2,407 samples. Pooled sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.92 to 0.97), specificity 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99), positive likelihood ratio 37.76 (95% CI = 12.84 to 111.02), and negative likelihood ratio 0.06 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.09). The area under the curve was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.20 to 1.00). For low prevalence (≤5%), the posttest probability that an individual with a positive test was a true positive ranged from 4% to 67%, whereas, at high prevalence (≥10%), the posttest probability was between 81% and 87%, indicating that a confirmatory test should be necessary, particularly with prevalence values of ≤1%. Regardless of prevalence, the probability that an individual with a negative test was a false negative was close to zero, indicating that the individual was not infected with HCV. In conclusion, the accuracy of the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay was very good for HCV screening in serum/plasma samples from PLWHA. The clinical utility to confirm HCV infection was acceptable in high-prevalence settings (≥10%) but poor in low-prevalence settings (≤1%). Furthermore, it was excellent in excluding active HCV infection.

Comparison Of Hepatitis C Antibody Assays And Evaluation Of Agreement Between Hepatitis C Antigen And PCR Results.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C is associated with a wide range of health repercussions. Pakistan is one of the highly prevalent countries of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. The availability of cost-effective, robust, and reliable screening and diagnostic tests for hepatitis C is important to address the disease burden. Standardization of screening and diagnostic assays in clinical laboratories is crucial for achieving big goals. Objectives of this study are to correlate the results of two different HCV antibody (HCV Ab) assays and to examine the correlation of HCV core antigen (HCV c Ag) results with HCV PCR for HCV infection diagnosis. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out from November to December 2020 at Dow University of Health Sciences. Total number of 40 HCV Ab samples were analysed by both chemiluminescence (CMIA) and electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) immunoassays. Tests for HCV RNA PCR and HCV c Ag were performed on all samples. Results of screening and diagnostic assays were correlated and agreements were examined. Statistical analysis for agreement was carried out by using R software version 3.6.3 through AC1 Gwetz Statistic. The study was approved by the institutional ethical review committee. RESULTS: An agreement of 0.73 and 0.95 was found between two different HCV Ab immunoassays and HCV c Ag and HCV PCR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good correlation between CMIA and ECLIA for HCV Ab. An excellent correlation was found between HCV c Ag and HCV PCR. Based on our study findings, HCV c Ag is a candidate test for the diagnosis of active HCV infection.

Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of hepatitis C core antigen detection during therapy with direct-acting antivirals.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) is monitored by assessing plasma HCV-RNA load. However, detection of HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) may be an alternative. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the HCVcAg assay to monitor the efficacy of DAAs in HCV-infected patients METHODS: We performed searches in multiple electronic databases until 6 July 2022, of studies evaluating the HCVcAg detection in plasma or serum compared with the HCV-RNA test (gold standard). We calculated pooled measurement at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, and at end-of-treatment (EOT), as well as sustained virological response (SVR; 12 weeks after EOT). RESULTS: We selected 16 studies from 2016 to 2022, with 3237 patients and 8958 samples. Overall, the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the HCVcAg assay were poor at week 2 (sensitivity = 0.40, specificity = 0.96, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) = 9.16, negative likelihood ratio (NLR) = 0.63, and area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) = 0.57), fair at week 4 (sensitivity = 0.30, specificity = 0.90, PLR = 3.18, NLR = 0.77, and AUC = 0.79), acceptable at EOT (sensitivity = 0.40, specificity =0.98, PLR = 16.54, NLR = 0.62, and AUC = 0.97) and excellent for SVR (sensitivity = 0.94, specificity = 0.99, PLR = 107.54, NLR = 0.06, and AUC = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The HCVcAg assay may be helpful for monitoring the efficacy of HCV treatment with DAAs in HCV-infected patients at EOT and for documenting SVR, but not at weeks 2 and 4 of treatment due to poor diagnostic performance.

A Proteomic Approach to Study the Biological Role of Hepatitis C Virus Protein Core+1/ARFP.

Hepatitis C virus is the major cause of chronic liver diseases and the only cytoplasmic RNA virus known to be oncogenic in humans. The viral genome gives rise to ten mature proteins and to additional proteins, which are the products of alternative translation initiation mechanisms. A protein-known as ARFP (alternative reading frame protein) or Core+1 protein-is synthesized by an open reading frame overlapping the HCV Core coding region in the (+1) frame of genotype 1a. Almost 20 years after its discovery, we still know little of the biological role of the ARFP/Core+1 protein. Here, our differential proteomic analysis of stable hepatoma cell lines expressing the Core+1/Long isoform of HCV-1a relates the expression of the Core+1/Long isoform with the progression of the pathology of HCV liver disease to cancer.

An adaptable platform for in-house hepatitis C serology.

Serology-based diagnosis remains one of the major tools for diagnosis and surveillance of infectious diseases. However, for many neglected diseases no or only few commercial assays are available and often with prices prohibiting large scale testing in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We developed an adaptable enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) using hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a proof-of-concept application. By combining the maltose-binding-protein with a multiepitope HCV protein, we were able to obtain a high concentration of protein suitable for downstream applications. Following optimization, the assay was verified using previously tested human samples from Canada, Denmark and Gabon in parallel with the use of a commercial protein. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to 98 % and 97 % respectively, after accounting for non-specific binding and assay optimization. This study provides a thorough description of the development, and validation of a multiepitope ELISA-based diagnostic assay against HCV, which could be implemented at low cost. The described methodology can be readily adapted to develop novel ELISA-based diagnostic assays for other infectious pathogens with well-described immunogenic epitopes. This method could improve the diagnosis of neglected diseases for which affordable diagnostic assays are lacking.

Performance of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Core Antigen Assay in the Diagnosis of Recently Acquired HCV Infection among High-Risk Populations.

How the hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCVcAg) assay performs in detecting recently acquired HCV infection among people living with HIV (PLWH) and HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) is rarely assessed in the Asia-Pacific region. High-risk participants, including PLWH with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), HCV clearance by antivirals or spontaneously, or elevated aminotransferases, HIV-negative MSM with STIs or on HIV preexposure prophylaxis, and low-risk PLWH were enrolled. Blood samples were subjected to 3-stage pooled-plasma HCV RNA testing every 3 to 6 months until detection of HCV viremia or completion of the 1-year follow-up. The samples at enrollment and all of the archived samples preceding the detection of HCV RNA during follow-up were tested for HCVcAg. During June 2019 and February 2021, 1,639 blood samples from 744 high-risk and 727 low-risk PLWH and 86 HIV-negative participants were tested for both HCV RNA and HCVcAg. Of 62 samples positive for HCV RNA, 54 (87.1%) were positive for HCVcAg. Of 1,577 samples negative for HCV RNA, 1,568 (99.4%) were negative for HCVcAg. The mean HCV RNA load of the 8 individual samples positive for HCV RNA but negative for HCVcAg was 3.2 (range, 2.5 to 3.9) log10 IU/mL, and that of the remaining 54 samples with concordant results was 6.2 (range, 1.3 to 8.5) log10 IU/mL. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HCVcAg were 85.7% and 99.5%, respectively. In at-risk populations, HCVcAg has a high specificity and NPV but lower sensitivity and PPV, particularly in individuals with low HCV RNA loads. IMPORTANCE The HCV core antigen assay has a high specificity of 99.4% and negative predictive value of 99.5% but a lower sensitivity of 87.1% and positive predictive value of 85.7% in the diagnosis of recently acquired HCV infection in high-risk populations. Our findings are informative for many countries confronted with limited resources to timely identify acute HCV infections and provide effective direct-acting antivirals to halt onward transmission.

Performance of HCV Antigen Testing for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Antiviral Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is based on the detection of HCV RNA that it is effective but presents high cost and the need to hire trained personnel. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of HCV Ag testing to identify HCV cases and to monitor antiviral treatment including DAA treatment. METHODS: The studies were identified through a search in PubMed, Lilacs, and Scopus from 1990 through March 31, 2020. Cohort, cross-sectional, and randomized controlled trials were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using an adapted Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Our primary outcome was to determine the accuracy of HCV Ag detection for the diagnosis, which we estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 3,062 articles identified, 54 met our eligibility criteria. The studies described cohorts from 20 countries, including 14,286 individuals with chronic HCV individuals. Studies for ECLIA technology demonstrated highest quality compared to studies that used ELISA. The pooled sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for HCV Ag detection of active HCV infection were 98.82% (95%CI = 98.04%; 99.30%) and 98.95% (95%CI = 97.84%; 99.49%), respectively. High concordance was found between HCV Ag testing and HCV RNA detection 89.7% and 95% to evaluate antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, HCV Ag testing could be useful to identify HCV active cases in low-resource areas. For antiviral treatment, HCV Ag testing will be useful at the end of treatment.

Laboratory-based testing for hepatitis C infection using dried blood spot samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

The use of dried blood spot (DBS) samples can facilitate the implementation of reflex testing by circumventing the need for centrifugation and freezing of venous blood samples. This systematic review assessed the accuracy of using DBS samples to diagnose chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify articles published up to July 2020 evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of anti-HCV, HCV-RNA and HCV core antigen tests using DBS. Screening, data extraction, quality appraisal and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations certainty of the evidence assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The evidence demonstrates that laboratory-based anti-HCV and HCV-RNA tests using DBS samples have high diagnostic accuracy. All comparisons were between DBS and venous samples. For the detection of anti-HCV, sensitivity was 95% (95% CI: 92%-97%) and specificity was 99% ([95% CI: 98%-99%]; n = 25; I2  = 81%; moderate certainty). For the detection of HCV-RNA, the sensitivity was 95% (95% CI: 93%-97%) and specificity was 97% ([95% CI: 94%-98%]; n = 20; I2  = 52%; moderate certainty). The sensitivity of HCV core antigen tests was 86% (95% CI: 79%-91%) and specificity was 98% ([95% CI: 94%-99%]; n = 5; I2  = 37%; low certainty) compared with HCV-RNA (the gold standard for detecting chronic HCV). DBS samples could facilitate diagnosis of chronic HCV infection as the necessary sequential tests (anti-HCV and then HCV-RNA or HCV core antigen) can be undertaken using the same blood sample. This could reduce loss of patient follow-up and support international efforts towards HCV elimination in both high and low prevalence settings.

One-step diagnosis strategy together with multidisciplinary telematics referral perform an effective approach for identifying and treating patients with active Hepatitis C infection.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Implementation of a one-step strategy for diagnosis of active Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection would encourage the early diagnosis and reduce the time to access antiviral treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a HCV one-step diagnosis compared to the traditional two-step protocol in terms of the time required for patients to be seen by specialists and the time taken to start antiviral treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative study was carried out to assess two diagnostic algorithms (one-step and two-step) for active HCV infection. Serological markers were quantified using the same serum sample to determine both anti-HCV antibodies (HCV-Ab) and HCV core antigen (HCV-cAg) by Architect i2000 SR kit. In this period, a multidisciplinary procedure was started for telematics referral of viremic patients. RESULTS: One-step approach reduced the time required for patient HCV diagnosis, referral to a specialist, access to treatment, and eliminated the loss of patients to follow-up. Significant differences were observed between one-step and two-step diagnosis methods in the time required for patients to be seen by a specialist (18 days [Interquartile range (IQR) = 14-42] versus 107 days [IQR = 62-148]) and for the initiation of treatment (54 days [IQR = 43-75] versus 200 days [IQR = 116-388]), mainly for patients with advanced fibrosis (35 days [IQR = 116-388] versus 126 days [IQR = 152-366]). CONCLUSIONS: Use of HCV-cAg has proven to be a useful tool for screening patients with active hepatitis C. The development of a multidisciplinary protocol for the communication of results improved the efficiency of the care process.