Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn ; 20(4): 367-373, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32056456

ABSTRACT

Introduction: IgE-mediated Hevea latex allergy and associated food-allergies constitute a significant health issue with serious consequences of diagnostic error. Hence, there is a need for more reliable confirmatory diagnostics.Areas covered: Here, we summarize the major limitations of conventional tests using native extracts and describe how piecing together the IgE reactivity profile can benefit correct diagnosis in difficult cases in whom conventional tests yield equivocal or negative results. A diagnostic algorithm integrating traditional sIgE and component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) is presented.Expert opinion: Moreover, it is clear that the discoveries in the field of the Hevea latex proteome will contribute to our understandings and accurate approach of sometimes complex cross-reactivity phenomena that extend beyond the 'latex-fruit syndrome.'


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Hevea/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Latex Hypersensitivity/immunology , Rubber/adverse effects , Biomarkers , Cross Reactions , Disease Susceptibility , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Latex Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Male , Proteome , Proteomics/methods
3.
Rev. colomb. biotecnol ; 13(1): 144-147, jul. 2011. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-600585

ABSTRACT

El mal suramericano de las hojas (SALB), enfermedad endémica del caucho (Hevea brasiliensis), es causado por Microcyclus ulei (forma imperfecta Fusicladium macrosporum) y constituye el principal limitante del cultivo en América, área donde el microorganismo patógeno es endémico. En forma semejante al de otros cultivos agrícolas, el manejo de esta enfermedad está condicionado a la disponibilidad de resistencia genética en el hospedero. En razón de su productividad y condición de resistencia genética, el clon FX 3864 ha sido ampliamente plantado en zonas con diferente potencialidad epidémica a la incidencia del SALB en Colombia, particularmente las denominadas de “no escape” a la enfermedad. Durante el 2010, plantaciones con el clon FX 3864 en fase productiva presentaron síntomas de SALB en zonas de escape ubicadas en la altillanura colombiana (departamento del Meta). En parcelas trampa ubicadas en áreas aledañas a los cultivos se estableció que la severidad promedio de la enfermedad alcanzó niveles de 5,78% en este clon. Verificada la causalidad de la enfermedad mediante observaciones al microscopio se procedió a confirmar el origen del material sobre el cual se desarrollaban las lesiones, utilizando marcadores moleculares (4 microsatélites específicos). Los resultados de la prueba permitieron confirmar la susceptibilidad del hasta hace poco resistente clon FX 3864 al SALB en Colombia. Se sugiere tomar en consideración la nueva condición de este clon y, en concordancia, reorientar los programas de fomento del cultivo advirtiendo a los agricultores sobre los riesgos potenciales de ocurrencia de la enfermedad en las nuevas áreas programadas.


South American Leaf Blight (SALB), caused by Microcyclus ulei (anamorph Fusicladium macrosporum), is an endemic major disease of the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in America. As well as in other crop systems, its management on rubber plantations relies on plant genetic resistance availability, among other means. FX 3864 is a rubber tree clone widely planted in Colombia due to its production capability and disease resistance. During 2010 SALB symptoms developed in commercial crops at the Meta region of Colombia. Crop traps located nearby the plantations showed mean disease severity levels of 5.78%. Once the causal organism was microscopically confirmed as responsible for the diseased tissue, their origin was characterized by molecular means using 4 microsatellites specific to the rubber tree. The procedure confirmed that FX 3864 was the clone of origin of the leaf tissue. SALB occurring over FX 3864 implies the need to redirect crop disease management measures to be followed on the new development areas of rubber cultivation, warning growers about potential hazards of disease incidence.


Subject(s)
Hevea/growth & development , Hevea/adverse effects , Hevea/embryology , Hevea/physiology , Hevea/genetics , Hevea/immunology , Hevea/microbiology , Hevea/parasitology , Hevea/chemistry
4.
Arch Argent Pediatr ; 108(6): e126-9, 2010 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21132237

ABSTRACT

The Euphorbiaceae family are plants that have in common latex production. There are over 8000 species. They have worldwide distribution. We can find trees, shrubs or herbs. Many important species belong to this family and they are used in our country for industrial and medical purposes. There are also ornamental plants with attractive appearance that stimulate children curiosity, intake or manipulation. In the National Poison Center consultations for plants represent a small number (0.2%) of the total accidents in children, however they can be serious. We report the case of a 4 years old girl who manipulated and swallowed part of an Euphorbiaceae family plant (Synadenium grantii).


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Exfoliative/chemically induced , Hevea/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 144(1): 64-8, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17505139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational allergy to latex is generally reported from occupational groups such as health care workers; however, few reports derive from other occupational settings. METHODS: Two male subjects working as loom tuners in a textile manufacturing plant developed severe allergic reactions during the cutting and weaving of elastic bands, initially not suspected to contain latex constituents. Clinical evaluation and lung function tests were supplemented by skin prick testing, specific IgE evaluation and basophil activation assays with extracted elastic bands. RESULTS: Both workers presented with rhinitis, episodes of tight chest and itchy eyes. Initial spirometry was normal with no significant reversibility; however, a histamine challenge test was positive in one worker. Skin prick testing to a battery of common inhalant allergens was negative; however, raised IgE levels were detected to latex using ImmunoCAP. On further testing, the specific IgE response was directed mainly to the major latex allergens rHev b 5, rHev b 6.01, rHev b 6.02 and nHev b 13. Basophils of the two workers, but not the unaffected control subjects, were strongly activated by extracts of the elastic and the cutting dust material. CONCLUSIONS: Workers are at high risk of becoming sensitised to latex allergens when exposed to excessive dust produced by loom tuning machines. Latex sensitisation should therefore be considered in workers developing unexplained work-related allergic reactions (including asthma) associated with unlabelled materials in the textile industry.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Industry , Latex Hypersensitivity/immunology , Occupational Diseases/immunology , Textiles , Adult , Allergens/immunology , Hevea/adverse effects , Hevea/immunology , Humans , Latex/adverse effects , Latex/immunology , Male
6.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg ; 57(2): 127-35, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16916182

ABSTRACT

First reported in 1979, anaesthetists now encounter more and more patients with latex allergy. Several risk groups prone to develop this allergy have been identified. A thorough preoperative interview is necessary to detect high-risk patients. For them, the perioperative period is very dangerous because of the many possibilities of contact with latex-containing materials. There is no cure for latex allergy. Absolute avoidance of contact with latex is the only safe way to treat those who belong to a risk group or who are already allergic. The diagnosis of latex allergy must be kept in mind in every case of perioperative anaphylaxis, even if the patient does not belong to a risk group. In the future, desensitization will probably be useful in helping patients with latex allergy.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Allergens/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Gloves, Surgical/adverse effects , Hevea/adverse effects , Humans , Latex/adverse effects , Latex Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Perioperative Care , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Risk Factors
7.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 5(6): 544-51, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16264336

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The characterization of clinically relevant latex allergens and the production of recombinant allergens is now well advanced, but this knowledge needs to be translated into new strategies for the safe and effective specific treatment of latex allergic diseases including asthma and anaphylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: The current status of latex allergy is discussed indicating a changing demographic paradigm. A new wave of latex allergy is emerging outside the healthcare setting with the widespread use of latex products. An increased prevalence in developing countries is also reported. Limited studies on current specific immunotherapy for latex allergy are reviewed, confirming the feasibility but demonstrating an unacceptable risk of adverse events. The characterization of latex allergens and the identification of B and T-cell epitopes point to rational strategies for the generation of hypoallergenic preparations for specific immunotherapy. Results to date for latex allergens are reviewed, including recombinant, chemical modification and synthetic peptide approaches. Candidate hypoallergenic preparations for targeting sensitization to the major allergens Hev b 1, Hev b 3, Hev b 5 and Hev b 6.01 have been identified. Further investigations of optimal regimens for the delivery of specific immunotherapy to induce regulatory T-cell function are warranted. SUMMARY: The findings point to the selection of suitable hypoallergenic preparations for clinical trials of effective and safe latex allergy immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Immunotherapy , Latex Hypersensitivity/therapy , Allergens/chemistry , Allergens/genetics , Desensitization, Immunologic , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte , Hevea/adverse effects , Hevea/immunology , Humans , Latex/adverse effects , Latex/immunology , Mutation , Recombinant Proteins
9.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 23(2): 141-7, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12001793

ABSTRACT

Allergen cross-reactions among three strongly sensitizing Euphorbiaceae species, i.e., the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis), castor bean (Ricinus communis), and the Mediterranean weed Mercurialis annua were studied in Finnish patients (n = 25) allergic to natural rubber latex (NRL), but with no known exposure to castor bean or M. annua, and French patients allergic to castor bean (n = 26) or to M. annua (n = 9), but not to NRL. In immunoglobulin E (IgE)-immunoblotting, 28% of NRL-allergic patient sera recognized castor bean seed and 48% reacted to castor bean pollen proteins. Likewise, 35% of the NRL-allergic patient sera bound to M. annua pollen allergens. Nineteen percent of castor bean-allergic patients showed IgE to NRL and 8% to M. annua proteins. Sera from patients allergic to M. annua reacted in 44% to NRL, in 56% to castor bean seed, and in 78% to castor bean pollen proteins. In immunoblotting, castor bean seed extract inhibited the binding of NRL-reactive IgE to 20 kDa, 30 kDa of NRL, and 55 kDa of proteins; NRL extract, in turn, inhibited the binding of castor bean-reactive IgE to 14, 21-22, 29, and 32-34 kDa of castor bean proteins. In ELISA inhibition, NRL extract inhibited 33% of the binding of M. annua--reactive IgE of pooled sera to M. annua pollen. In conclusion, allergen cross-reactivity in vitro was observed among three botanically related Euphorbiaceae members, H. brasiliensis, R. communis, and M. annua, but the molecular specificity of the observed cross-reactions as well as their clinical significance remains to be elucidated. Allergen cross-reactivity should be taken into account in diagnostic work.


Subject(s)
Allergens/pharmacology , Euphorbiaceae/adverse effects , Hevea/adverse effects , Latex Hypersensitivity/etiology , Latex Hypersensitivity/immunology , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Plant Proteins/pharmacology , Pollen/adverse effects , Ricin/adverse effects , Ricin/pharmacology , Seeds/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/immunology , Child , Euphorbiaceae/immunology , Female , Finland , Hevea/immunology , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Proteins/immunology , Pollen/immunology , Ricin/immunology , Seeds/immunology
10.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 12(3): 169-76, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12530115

ABSTRACT

Because of widespread latex manufacturing in the last decades, exposure to latex has become ever greater, as has the incidence of latex allergy among the general population as well as the high-risk groups. Clinical manifestations range from local reactions (edema, itching, erythema, and papulae), rhino-conjunctivitis, asthma, pharyngeal edema, to severe systemic reactions such as anaphylactic shock (from parenteral exposure especially during medical examinations or surgical procedures). Diagnosis is formulated on the basis of the personal history and an accurate allergological evaluation. Patients usually have a history of food intolerance or adverse reactions during medical or surgical procedures, which are believed to be the result of anesthetics or other drugs. In vivo tests are prick and patch tests and challenge tests. Challenge tests (nasal, conjunctival, bronchial, intravaginal, sublingual, oral, and cutaneous tests) are important for confirming the diagnosis, for evaluating a patient's response to the different kinds of latex exposure, and for verifying the effects of desensitizing treatments on the various organs involved in latex allergy. The most important in vitro test is the specific anti-natural rubber latex IgE assay. The only effective resolution to the latex allergy problem seems to be desensitization. The criteria of effectiveness are the capability to use latex items, to undergo medical examinations (even invasive), and to remain in an environment where latex particles can be inhaled (such as surgical departments), without symptoms. The first attempts were performed by subcutaneous administration of latex, but this protocol seems to be delicate to perform because of the side effects. Two different alternative methods (percutaneous and sublingual) were successfully performed and proved to be safer and more effective, even though further studies on a larger group of patients are needed.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Hevea/adverse effects , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Latex Hypersensitivity/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...