Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
2.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0255560, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) significantly affects the patient`s quality of life and leads to multiple medical consultations. Aim of this study was to assess the utilization of medical care of HS patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients presenting in 2017 for an outpatient, day patient and / or inpatient treatment with leading claim type HS at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, were included. Primary outcome was the economic burden of HS patients, measured by resource utilization in €. RESULTS: The largest share of the direct medical costs for HS were the inpatient costs with a leading surgical diagnosis-related group (DRG). Antiseptics were the predominant topical prescription. While doxycycline was the most frequently prescribed systemic therapy, adalimumab was the main cost driver. The difference between in-patient (€ 110.25) and outpatient (€ 26.34) direct non-medical costs was statistically significant (p < 0.001). With regards to indirect medical costs, a statistically significantly higher loss of gross value added (inpatient mean € 1,827.00; outpatient mean € 203.00) and loss of production (inpatient mean € 1,026.00; outpatient mean € 228.00) could be noted (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study on disease-specific costs of HS confirms that the hospital care of patients with this disease is cost-intensive. However, the primary goal of physicians is not and should not be to save costs regarding their patients`treatment, but rather the premise to utilize the existing resources as efficient as possible. Reducing the use of costly therapeutics and inpatient stays therefore requires more effective therapy options with an improved cost-benefit profile.


Subject(s)
Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitals, University/economics , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/pathology , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
Dermatol Online J ; 26(4)2020 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621692

ABSTRACT

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic, painful disease that significantly reduces quality of life. Laser hair reduction is one modality that can be used in combination with other treatments to ameliorate the condition. We argue that insurance should provide coverage for this necessary service.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health , Low-Level Light Therapy/economics , Hair/radiation effects , Hair Removal/methods , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Humans , United States
5.
BMJ Open ; 9(9): e030579, 2019 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31575575

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) causes substantial morbidity and quality-of-life impairment. We examined demographic/clinical characteristics of patients with HS and treatment patterns, prevalence and healthcare resource utilisation/expenditures related to HS in the real-world. DESIGN: Retrospective claims data of MarketScan Commercial, Medicare Supplemental and Medicaid databases (2009-2014). SETTING: USA. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥12 years with ≥3 non-diagnostic outpatient or inpatient claims with an HS diagnosis code and ≥12 months continuous enrolment with medical and pharmacy benefits before (preindex) and after (postindex) the earliest diagnosis of HS (index) were included. RESULTS: There were 11 325 Commercial/Medicare patients (mean age 37.4 years) and 5164 Medicaid patients (mean age 28.3 years). HS was more common in Medicaid than Commercial/Medicare patients (0.301% and 0.098%, respectively, in 2014). Cellulitis and psychiatric disorders were the most common comorbidities and oral antibiotics and narcotics were the most frequently prescribed drugs preindex, with ≥10% increase postindex in both populations. HS-related inpatient costs decreased while outpatient costs increased from preindex to postindex. Medicaid patients had several risk factors that may be associated with poor outcomes (eg, high rates of prescription pain medication use, comorbidities, drug discontinuation/interruption/holiday, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisation). CONCLUSIONS: Commercial/Medicare and Medicaid HS beneficiaries experience high comorbidity burden but use different treatment modalities to manage HS. Results suggest a substantial unmet need exists among this patient population, with Medicaid patients experiencing a particularly high burden of disease and expensive healthcare resource utilisation.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Adult , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
6.
Br J Dermatol ; 181(1): 147-154, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30120887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic cutaneous disease, can negatively affect work life. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort study evaluates the indirect burden among employed patients with HS in the U.S.A. METHODS: Newly diagnosed and general patients with HS, who were employees (age 18-64 years) from a large claims database (Q1 1999 to Q1 2015), were matched 1 : 5 to controls. Income growth and risk of leaving the workforce were assessed among the newly diagnosed HS and control cohorts in the 5-year study period. Income, work loss days and indirect costs (absenteeism and disability) were assessed among the general HS and control cohorts in the 1-year study period. RESULTS: Newly diagnosed (n = 1003, mean age 39·5 years, 66·3% female) and general patients with HS (n = 1204, mean age 39·9 years, 69·1% female) were matched to 5015 and 6020 controls, respectively. Newly diagnosed patients with HS had significantly slower income growth ($324 per year) and higher risk of leaving the workforce (adjusted hazard ratio 1·65, 95% confidence interval 1·45-1·88) compared with controls (all P < 0·05). General patients with HS had more total days of work loss (18·4 vs. 7·7), higher annual total indirect costs ($2925 vs. $1483) and lower annual income ($54 925 vs. $62 357) than controls (all P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with newly diagnosed HS and general patients with HS experienced a greater indirect burden than matched controls.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Income/statistics & numerical data , Absenteeism , Adult , Costs and Cost Analysis , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , United States
7.
Br J Dermatol ; 180(5): 1161-1168, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The introduction of adalimumab in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) raises questions regarding the cost-efficacy of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To explore cost-efficacy of treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents in a real-world cohort. METHODS: Patients with Hurley stage II and III HS with ≥ 1 year of follow-up and at least three visits per year from September 2003 to December 2016 were analysed. Patient visits were divided into two categories - visits for treatment with agents blocking TNF or visits for other therapies. The cost of exacerbations was calculated based on the cost of items provided in current price lists or by the national health insurance agency in cases of hospitalization. Effectiveness of anti-TNF agents was calculated by assessing containment of exacerbations. The primary study end point was the cost-savings achieved using anti-TNF agents. RESULTS: Overall, 1211 patient visits for 250 patients were analysed. Total containment of exacerbations was found in 25·1% of visits involving other therapies and in 63·4% of visits involving anti-TNF agents. The cost-savings per patient visit for patients receiving anti-TNF agents vs. other therapies was €178·92. The odds ratio for the total containment of exacerbations among patients with Hurley stage II and III was 4·86 and 6·03, respectively (P = 0·466). Treatment with anti-TNF agents was an independent variable affecting annual cost as shown by two-way analysis of variance. In Hurley stage III HS, mean annual cost was €8309·60 under other therapies compared with €3264·20 using anti-TNF agents (P = 0·004). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with anti-TNF agents achieves significant cost-benefit through containment of HS exacerbations. The efficacy of anti-TNF agents was similar for both disease stages.


Subject(s)
Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Cost Savings , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Adalimumab/economics , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Greece , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/immunology , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Symptom Flare Up , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology , Young Adult
8.
Br J Dermatol ; 181(2): 275-281, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30422314

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with pain, disfigurement, psychosocial distress and poor quality of life, all of which may lead to a higher likelihood of mental health (MH) disorders. However, little is known about the MH comorbidities of HS. OBJECTIVES: To determine the MH disorders and cost burden associated with HS. METHODS: Data were examined from the 2002-2012 National Inpatient Sample, comprising approximately a 20% sample of all U.S. paediatric and adult hospitalizations (87 053 155 admissions). RESULTS: MH disorders were much more common in inpatients with vs. without HS (34·27% vs. 20·05%). In multivariable logistic regression models controlling for sex, age, race/ethnicity and insurance status, HS was associated with significantly higher odds of an MH disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2·53, 95% confidence interval 2·42-2·63), including 10 of 15 MH disorders examined. In contrast, HS was not associated with primary hospitalization for an MH disorder overall (odds ratio 0·95, 95% confidence interval 0·84-1·07), but it was associated with primary hospitalization for eight of 15 MH disorders examined. Among inpatients with HS, primary admission for an MH disorder was associated with female sex, public or no insurance and more chronic diseases, but inversely associated with older age and nonwhite race/ethnicity. HS was associated with > $38 million (USD) of excess mean annual costs of hospitalization for MH disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients with HS had increased odds of comorbid MH disorders, overall, and multiple primary MH admissions, in particular, which were associated with considerable excess costs.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/psychology , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health/economics , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 22(3): 312-317, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29528753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating disease with long-lasting comorbidities that impose direct and indirect costs on the health care system. However, limited studies have estimated the burden of this disease in Canada, and no population-based studies have previously addressed this condition. OBJECTIVES: This work describes the characteristics of a population-based HS cohort to address the existing knowledge gap on the burden of HS for the Canadian health care system. This cohort will provide a foundation for further studies about clinical outcomes and risk factors of HS by providing opportunities for merging additional databases. METHODS: Data on demographic information, morbidities, relative resource use, and the cost of sectorial services were obtained from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES). All residents of Ontario covered by the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2013, who underwent surgery for HS, defined by OHIP billing codes, were included. RESULTS: A total of 6244 cases were included in the analysis, following quality control procedures. Twice as many females were treated surgically relative to males. The majority of individuals treated were under the age of 64, with more than half having a moderate level of morbidity (according to Resource Utilization Bands defined by the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group Classification System). CONCLUSIONS: This cohort study is the first population-based resource about HS in Canada. Administrative population-based databases provide essential information to assess the burden of chronic diseases and identify factors associated with higher cost.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
10.
Dermatology ; 233(5): 396-398, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28954266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are limited data evaluating the utilization of dermatologists for the care of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. OBJECTIVE: To determine the utilization of the dermatology ambulatory encounter among hidradenitis suppurativa patients, and to evaluate whether utilization varies by insurance status. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis in an adult population sample of 42,030 hidradenitis suppurativa patients with either private or public health insurance who were identified by a validated scheme using SNOMED-CT terminology. The primary outcome was a dichotomous variable defined as having at least 1 ambulatory encounter with a dermatologist over a 3-year period. RESULTS: Overall, 21.8% (9,170/42,020) of the hidradenitis suppurativa patients had at least 1 ambulatory encounter with a dermatologist. This proportion did not significantly vary between patients with private insurance (22%), Medicaid (21.6%), and Medicare (21.7%). CONCLUSION: Utilization of the ambulatory dermatology encounter among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa is low in the USA. Factors other than insurance status influence this level of utilization.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Dermatology , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Cohort Studies , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 35(8): 805-815, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28176188

ABSTRACT

As part of its single technology appraisal (STA) process, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of adalimumab (AbbVie) to submit evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The appraisal assessed adalimumab as monotherapy in adult patients with an inadequate response to conventional systemic HS therapy. The School of Health and Related Research Technology Appraisal Group was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). The ERG produced a critical review of the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the technology based on the company's submission to NICE. The evidence was mainly derived from three randomised controlled trials comparing adalimumab with placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe HS. The clinical-effectiveness review found that significantly more patients achieved a clinical response in the adalimumab groups than in the control groups but that the treatment effect varied between trials and there was uncertainty regarding its impact on a range of other relevant outcomes as well as long-term efficacy. The company's submitted Markov model assessed the incremental cost effectiveness of adalimumab versus standard care for the treatment of HS from the perspective of the UK NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) over a lifetime horizon. The original submitted model, including a patient access scheme (PAS), suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for adalimumab versus standard care was expected to be £16,162 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Following a critique of the model, the ERG's preferred base case, which corrected programming errors and structural problems surrounding discontinuation rules and incorporated a lower unit cost for HS surgery, resulted in a probabilistic ICER of £29,725 per QALY gained. Based on additional analyses undertaken by the company and the ERG following the publication of the appraisal consultation document (ACD), the Appraisal Committee concluded that the maximum possible ICER for adalimumab compared with supportive care was between £28,500 and £33,200 per QALY gained but was likely to be lower. The Appraisal Committee recommended adalimumab (with the PAS) for the treatment of active moderate-to-severe HS in adults whose disease has not responded to conventional systemic therapy.


Subject(s)
Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/drug therapy , Adalimumab/economics , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/physiopathology , Humans , Markov Chains , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods
12.
J Wound Care ; 26(Sup1): S36-S42, 2017 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28105901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral axillary hidradenitis is a chronic, suppurative, and scarring disease that is most effectively treated by complete excision of all hair-bearing tissues. We assessed our staged procedure for excision and placement of a split-thickness skin graft for bilateral axillary hidradenitis in terms of costs, outcomes, and timing of excision. METHOD: An IRB approved retrospective case analysis was performed on patients that underwent bilateral axillary hidradenitis skin excision with eventual placement of split-thickness skin grafting using the current LSUHSC/University Health hidradenitis surgical treatment protocol. Using ICD-9 codes (705.83) and CPT codes (11041, 11042, 11451, 11600, 11601, 11602, 11603, 11604) we reviewed cases performed at our institution from 1 January 2008 to 24 Febuary 2014 and we selected patients based on bilateral axillary involvement (alone) and >1 year history of active disease. Patients were excluded if resection of tissue encompassed regions outside of the immediately adjacent axillary. RESULTS: A total of seven patients matching criteria for bilateral axillary hidradenitis were selected for analysis. Clinical course, cost and surgical techniques were assessed. Of the seven patients, six required admission throughout their treatment due to lack of funding making use of negative pressure wound therapy at home not possible. These patients stayed an average of 10 days with a mean hospital charge of $35,178 and a mean hospital provider charge of $10,019. No recurrence was demonstrated. All patients attained full range of motion, post grafting. No patient required a further operation due to graft failure. CONCLUSION: Split-thickness skin grafting without use of bilayer dermal regenerative templates yielded definitive results with acceptable cosmesis and functionality, without the added cost of treatments such as a bilayer dermal regenerative template.


Subject(s)
Axilla , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Pressure Ulcer/surgery , Adult , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/nursing , Humans , Male , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Pressure Ulcer/economics , Pressure Ulcer/nursing , Retrospective Studies , Skin Transplantation , Wound Healing , Young Adult
13.
Br J Dermatol ; 176(4): 1048-1055, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27534703

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The health resource utilization associated with managing patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in England is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with HS and hospital resource use associated with management of HS in England. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics data. Patients with a primary diagnostic code for HS (ICD-10 code L73·2) during an inpatient admission (n = 11 359) between 1 April 2007 and 31 December 2013 were identified; patients with code L73·2 attending only as outpatients were excluded. Data for all inpatient, outpatient and accident and emergency admissions during the study period were extracted. RESULTS: Of the 11 359 patients, 10 832 had a first recorded inpatient HS diagnostic code (index spell) during the study period (female 7569, 69·9%). The mean age at the index spell was 39 ± 13·1 years in men and 36 ± 11·7 years in women. There were 65 544 inpatient spells during the study period; 7202 (63·4%) patients underwent nonelective spells, 4128 (36.3%) elective spells and 9790 (86·2%) day-case attendances. There were 43 773 accident and emergency attendances during the study period in 8716 (76·7%) patients. There were 303 204 outpatient appointments in 11 203 patients (mean 27·1 per patient); 4827 (42·5%) of the study population attended dermatology, 8087 (71·2%) general surgery and 4111 (36·2%) plastic surgery. Based on the mean number of spells per patient per year, the mean hospital resource utilization cost for a patient with HS was £2027 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: HS is associated with a large burden of hospital attendances for young patients of working age and high National Health Service resource costs.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Adult , Appointments and Schedules , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , England , Female , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
J Med Econ ; 19(7): 710-7, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26938967

ABSTRACT

Objective Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is often treated by surgery. The risk of recurrence after surgery is common and the consequences are substantial, but neither has been quantified using a claims database. This study aimed to estimate the burden associated with non-curative surgery in HS patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of health insurance claims data from Q1 1999 to Q2 2011 in a US claims database. The analysis included 2668 adults with ≥1 diagnosis of HS and ≥1 claim for skin surgery within 6 months after diagnosis. Healthcare resource utilization and medical costs were compared using multivariate regressions. Results Overall, 46% of HS patients had ≥1 indicator of non-curative surgery. The incidences of inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient visits were 88%, 40%, and 30% higher, respectively, for patients with non-curative surgery vs patients without indicator of non-curative surgery (all p < 0.001). Average medical costs were $11,858 and $6427 for patients with and without indicators of non-curative surgery, respectively. The difference of $4185 (p < 0.001) was mainly driven by inpatient costs (difference = $2685; p < 0.001). Limitations Indicators of non-curative HS surgery were defined based on an empirical algorithm. Conclusions Non-curative HS surgery occurred in almost half of all cases and represents a significant burden on patients and payers in terms of resource utilization and costs.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Expenditures , Health Services/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Recurrence , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies
15.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 73(4): 609-14, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26190241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic cutaneous disease with acutely painful flares. In a prior study of all-cause utilization, patients with HS had higher utilization of emergency department (ED) and inpatient care. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess utilization of medical care specifically related to HS, especially high-cost settings. METHODS: The MarketScan medical claims database was examined for participants with either HS or psoriasis based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, during the study period, January 2008 to December 2012. This was a cohort cost-identification study with analyses of utilization measures and direct costs. RESULTS: The proportion of the HS cohort hospitalized was 5.1% and was higher than the psoriasis cohort (1.6%) (P < .0001). The proportion of patients who used the ED was also higher in the HS cohort (7.4% vs 2.6%, P < .0001). When compared with a subset of patients with severe psoriasis, the proportions of patients with HS who used the ED (7.4% vs 4.2%, P < .0001) or inpatient care (5.1% vs 2.5%, P < .0001) remained elevated. LIMITATIONS: The study sample may not be generalizable to other patient populations and may represent those with more severe disease. Pharmaceutical costs were not included and confounding factors such as race, socioeconomic status, and insurance type were not investigated. CONCLUSION: Patients with HS had increased utilization of high-cost settings, such as the ED and inpatient care, compared with patients with psoriasis, another chronic inflammatory disease. Both patients and providers should be aware of this finding and further work is needed to incorporate assessment of patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Hospitalization/economics , Adult , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Databases, Factual , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Health Services Research , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/economics , Psoriasis/therapy , Retrospective Studies , United States , Young Adult
17.
JAMA Dermatol ; 150(9): 937-44, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24908260

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic cutaneous disease with acutely painful flares that require appropriate and timely treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess how individuals with HS utilize medical care, especially emergency department (ED) care, a high-cost setting, and to describe the health care costs for this group. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort cost-identification study of 150 493 individuals with claims from the MarketScan medical claims database. Patients with claims for HS and psoriasis (16 736 and 110 266, respectively) and a control group with neither condition (23 491) during the study period, January 2008 to December 2010, were included. EXPOSURES: An HS cohort was formed from all the patients who had 2 or more claims for HS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code 705.83) during the 3-year period. A psoriasis cohort was used as a comparison group, since it is another chronic inflammatory condition with prominent skin findings. This group included randomly selected patients who had 2 or more claims for psoriasis (ICD-9 code 696.1) during the 3-year period. A second control group included randomly selected patients who had no claims for either condition during the 3-year period. From these cohorts only patients that were continuously enrolled for the 3-year period were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Health care utilization measures including inpatient length of stay, emergency department and outpatient visits, and number of days supplied of prescription medication were investigated. Cost variables were also investigated and included inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, prescription drug, and total all-cause health care expenditures, which were adjusted for inflation and reported in 2010 US dollars. RESULTS: The largest component of the total 3-year cost for the HS group was inpatient cost (37.4%). In contrast, for the psoriasis group this was drug costs (46.5%) and for the control group, inpatient costs (40.9%). The proportion of people who were hospitalized in the HS cohort (15.8%) was higher than the psoriasis (10.8%) or control (8.6%) groups (P < .001). The proportion of patients who used the ED over the 3-year period was higher in the HS cohort (27.1%) than the psoriasis (17.4%) or control groups (17.2%) (P < .001). Similarly, the mean (SD) 3-year ED cost for the HS group was $2002 ($6632) and was higher than both comparison groups (P < .001). After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities, ED utilization remained higher in the HS group compared with the control (P < .001) and psoriasis (P = .02) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hidradenitis suppurativa affects a younger, predominantly female population of patients. High-cost settings, such as ED and inpatient care, are used more frequently for patients with HS. Both patients and clinicians should be aware of this finding, and further research is needed to investigate the impact of health care utilization on patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa/economics , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Costs and Cost Analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...