A review of surgical and reconstructive techniques for hidradenitis suppurativa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory follicular dermatological condition that typically affects the intertriginous and anogenital regions of the apocrine gland-bearing skin. The management of this chronic and recurring disease necessitates a combination of lifestyle changes, medication, and surgical approaches to achieve the best possible outcomes. While medical treatments are recommended for this multimodal disease, surgical therapy, which is the gold standard of treatment for HS, has proven to be the most effective treatment because it provides long-lasting local disease control, reduces the recurrence of lesions, and ensures complete healing of lesions. In the last decade, there has been exponential growth in research into various surgical techniques and reconstructive care, enabling patients to have more surgical options. There is a wide range of surgical management procedures available, such as incision and drainage, deroofing, excisional surgery, carbon dioxide laser therapy, and skin tissue-sparing excision with electrosurgical peeling. Among these surgical procedures, wide surgical excision is the best option since it can eradicate all the affected lesions. Meanwhile, the preferred approach to reconstruction at various anatomical locations remains debatable. Here, we review a variety of surgical treatments and reconstructive techniques for HS, particularly various flap techniques for the axillary, gluteal, and inframammary regions.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa; a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease affecting apocrine gland-bearing sites of the body. Radiofrequency (RF) is a minimally invasive method that acts by minimizing thermal damage to the dermis, resulting in collagen synthesis and scar improvement. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of RF in treating HS. METHODS: A systematic search was performed up to November 18th, 2023, in PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science. Clinical studies with English full texts were included. The National Institute of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for clinical trials and Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports by Murad et al. were utilized for critical appraisal. RESULTS: Out of 55 identified studies, 11 met our inclusion criteria with 167 subjects who underwent RF therapy alone or combined with an intense pulsed laser (IPL), known as LAight®. LAight® significantly improved clinical outcomes in mild-to-moderate HS patients based on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score System (IHS4), Pain-Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR). Moreover, RF therapy alone significantly alleviated the clinical manifestations in patients with mild-to-moderate HS. Additionally, fractional microneedling RF significantly decreased HS-associated inflammatory markers. RF was found to be safe with limited adverse events. However, in moderate-to-severe HS, RF has failed to yield satisfactory results. CONCLUSION: RF is a safe energy-based method with promising outcomes, especially for long-term application in mild-to-moderate HS. In moderate-to-severe cases, RF should be combined with a systemic medication for further beneficial impacts.

Efficacy and safety of a combined pharmacological and surgical approach in patients affected by hidradenitis suppurativa: data from a retrospective real-world clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating chronic skin disease; its therapeutic approach often requires combined medical and surgical treatment. METHODS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the surgical approach combined with different pharmacological treatments, evaluating the proportion of patients achieving the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), along with the incidence of postoperative complications, and local recurrence. A retrospective study of HS patients (Hurley I-III) presenting at least one skin lesion requiring surgery was performed. Demographic and clinical data were collected (kind and anatomical location of lesion excised, type of surgical procedure). Further data included: Hurley stage and IHS4 at baseline and week 16, HiSCR at week 16 after surgery, ongoing therapy at the time of surgery (topical, systemic antibiotic, biologics), postoperative complications and local recurrence at week 16. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with female predominance (66.7%, 28/42), with a mean age of 30.3 (SD±10.5) years, were enrolled. At week 16, 53% of patients achieved HiSCR, with baseline Hurley III inversely related to HiSCR achievement (P<0.05). No increased incidence of postoperative complications was detected. Three cases of local recurrence were reported at week 16. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy in the management of HS; no increased risk of complications emerged among patients concomitantly treated with biologics, compared to those on conventional systemic therapy or exclusively treated with surgery.

Management of Pilonidal Disease and Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Pilonidal disease and hidradenitis suppurativa affect healthy young adults, causing discomfort and pain that leads to loss of work productivity and should be approached in a personalized manner. Patients with pilonidal disease should engage in hair removal to the sacrococcygeal region and surgical options considered. Hidradenitis suppurativa can be a morbid and challenging disease process. Medical management with topical agents, antibiotics, and biologics should be used initially but wide local excision should be considered in severe or refractory cases of the disease.

An Update on Current Clinical Management and Emerging Treatments in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a severe, debilitating, chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses and draining sinus tracts in intertriginous areas. While this condition appears to stem from follicular unit dysfunction, its cause is multifactorial and the exact pathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. These factors make treatment selection challenging and contribute to variable therapeutic response among affected patients. Typical regimens consist of a combination of medical and surgical modalities, tailored to individual responses. However, HS is often refractory to traditional treatments, prompting the need for newer and more effective therapies. Herein, we review current and emerging HS therapies.

Complex decongestive therapy in hidradenitis suppurativa-related genital lymphoedema: a case report.

Genital lymphoedema is a rare but debilitating and disfiguring complication of longstanding hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Despite the existence of medical and surgical methods that offer varying success rates in a limited number of cases, no data exist about the use of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in HS-related genital lymphoedema. This case report describes the treatment and outcome of a 56-year-old male patient with severe scrotal lymphoedema due to underlying HS (Hurley stage 3). The patient was unresponsive to various topical and systemic antibiotics and biological agents, including adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. When the patient was assessed, ixekizumab treatment for his HS was planned. He had progressive oedema in the genital area for two years with difficulty in wearing trousers and having sexual intercourse, and painful urination. CDT was recommended for three days a week concurrently with ixekizumab treatment. The patient and his wife were also educated about self-drainage techniques and skincare maintenance. After six sessions of CDT over 14 days, the patient demonstrated a significant reduction in scrotal measurements. He achieved a better scrotal contour, the degree of the buried penis was decreased, and urination was easier and painless. The findings of this case report showed that CDT was an easily applicable, practical and promising method that offered a rapid treatment response for HS-related genital lymphoedema.

Deroofing: A safe, effective and well-tolerated procedure in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a recurrent, debilitating, chronic disorder of the pilosebaceous unit. Although advances in HS treatment have been made, more than 45% of patients remain dissatisfied with systemic treatment, and more than one-third are dissatisfied with surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: A prospective, observational study on the deroofing procedures in HS with special attention paid to patient satisfaction and complications. METHODS: HS lesions were assessed clinically and by the use of ultrasound. Patients reported outcomes, including pain, itch and satisfaction, were measured at 24 h post-surgery by a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Additionally, the timeline of objective wound closure reported by patients in (weeks), in addition to the need for any analgesics use, were both evaluated. RESULTS: The mean closure time of the post-deroofing wound was assessed as 4.4 ± 1.9 weeks. A statistically longer time was necessary for complete closure in males than in females (4.9 ± 2.2 weeks and 3.9 ± 1.6 weeks, respectively; p = 0.046). The closure time correlated positively yet weakly with the HS tunnel's width (r = 0.27, p = 0.016) and length (r = 0.228, p = 0.044). Patients assessed mean pain at 24 h post-op as mild with 0.7 ± 1.2 points according to NRS, with no differences between sexes. Similarly, itch in the first 24 h was assessed as mild with 1.8 ± 1.1 points, without differences between sexes. No pain, itch or adverse events were reported after 1 week following deroofing. Moreover, no cases of wound infection were reported. An overall patient satisfaction was assessed as 9.9 ± 0.4 points (range 9-10 points). CONCLUSION: Deroofing is an easy, effective and safe dermatosurgical procedure that does not require surgical experience or operating theatre. It is associated with no complications and very low post-op pain and should be part of holistic HS management.

Pedicled circumflex scapular artery perforator flap with intra-axillary tunneling for axillary defect coverage after surgical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa: A case report and literature review.

Axillary defects represent a rather common issue in plastic surgery practice. Surgical resections related to skin disease are frequent in this region and their extension often requires soft tissue transfer for coverage. In this setting, locoregional pedicled flaps are usually preferred. The nearby tissues offer pliable but still resistant skin, which satisfy the "like-with-like" reconstructive principle. Over the years different procedures have been described for this purpose. Among them, a valuable and often underestimated technique is the circumflex scapular artery perforator flap (CSAP). This technique might be particularly suitable for thin but relatively large defects. Its main advantages are a low donor site morbidity, a very reliable anatomy, and a perforator pedicle able supply a large skin paddle. In the present work, we report the use of a pedicled vertical CSAP flap passed through the axillary canal in order to cover a 9 cm × 7 cm axillary defect after surgical excision of hidradenitis suppurativa resistant to conservative treatment. The perforator-based pedicled presented two branches, which allowed us to harvest safely a large skin paddle, which limited its range of motion. For this reason, we opted for a passage through the axillary canal for the flap inset. The postoperative course was uneventful and full shoulder range of motion was obtained at 3 months follow-up. Despite most of the descriptions of this flap available so far showed its employment for limb's reconstructions, we believe that it is a very useful tool also for locoregional coverage. Moreover, the unconventional passage below the axillary muscles allowed reaching the recipient site even with a shorter pedicle, such as the one encountered in this case.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful disease affecting flexures and other skin regions, producing nodules, abscesses and skin tunnels. Laser treatment targeting hair follicles and deroofing of skin tunnels are standard HS interventions in some countries but are rarely offered in the UK. OBJECTIVES: To describe current UK HS management pathways and influencing factors to inform the design of future randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: THESEUS was a nonrandomized 12-month prospective cohort study set in 10 UK hospitals offering five interventions: oral doxycycline 200 mg daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks, extended for longer in some cases; laser treatment targeting hair follicles; deroofing; and conventional surgery. The primary outcome was the combination of clinician-assessed eligibility and participant hypothetical willingness to receive each intervention. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants selecting each intervention as their final treatment option; the proportion who switch treatments; treatment fidelity; and attrition rates. THESEUS was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN69985145. RESULTS: The recruitment target of 150 participants was met after 18 months, in July 2021, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline demographics reflected the HS secondary care population: average age 36 years, 81% female, 20% non-White, 64% current or ex-smokers, 86% body mass index ≥ 25, 68% with moderate disease, 19% with severe disease and 13% with mild disease. Laser was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants eligible and willing to receive treatment, then deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), clindamycin and rifampicin (44%), and doxycycline (37%). Laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion of participants (41%). Attrition rates were 11% and 17% after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Concordance with doxycycline was 52% after 3 months due to lack of efficacy, participant choice and adverse effects. Delays with procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants starting laser and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Uptake of conventional surgery was too small to characterize the intervention. Switching treatment was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: THESEUS has established laser treatment and deroofing for HS in the UK and demonstrated their popularity with patients and clinicians for future RCTs.

Use of multiple fasciocutaneous flaps for the management of extensive hidradenitis suppurativa.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a relapsing nature that has a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. The clinical presentation of the disease includes deep dermal abscesses and sinus tracts. Long-term affliction of the disease may lead to contractures, scars and fibrosis. Management is still challenging and varies from medical to surgical options. We report the following case of a man in his 30s who presented with severe HS in the axillae, groins, perineum and lower sacral region. The patient has been treated by excision of the whole lesions followed by using multiple fasciocutaneous flaps as a reconstructive method.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent inflammatory lesions and skin tunnels in flexural sites such as the axilla. Deroofing of skin tunnels and laser treatment are standard hidradenitis suppurativa interventions in some countries but not yet introduced in the United Kingdom. Objective: To understand current hidradenitis suppurativa management pathways and what influences treatment choices to inform the design of future randomised controlled trials. Design: Prospective 12-month observational cohort study, including five treatment options, with nested qualitative interviews and an end-of-study consensus workshop. Setting: Ten United Kingdom hospitals with recruitment led by dermatology and plastic surgery departments. Participants: Adults with active hidradenitis suppurativa of any severity not adequately controlled by current treatment. Interventions: Oral doxycycline 200 mg once daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin, both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks initially; laser treatment targeting the hair follicle (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet or alexandrite); deroofing; and conventional surgery. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who are eligible, and hypothetically willing, to use the different treatment options. Secondary outcomes included proportion of participants choosing each of the study interventions, with reasons for their choices; proportion of participants who switched treatments; treatment fidelity; loss to follow-up rates over 12 months; and efficacy outcome estimates to inform outcome measure instrument responsiveness. Results: Between February 2020 and July 2021, 151 participants were recruited, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up rates were 89% and 83% after 3 and 6 months, decreasing to 70% and 44% at 9 and 12 months, respectively, because pandemic recruitment delays prevented all participants reaching their final review. Baseline demographics included an average age of 36 years, 81% female, 20% black, Asian or Caribbean, 64% current or ex-smokers and 86% with a raised body mass index. Some 69% had moderate disease, 19% severe disease and 13% mild disease. Regarding the study's primary outcome, laser treatment was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants who were eligible and hypothetically willing to receive treatment, followed by deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), the combination of oral clindamycin and rifampicin (44%) and doxycycline (37%). Considering participant willingness in isolation, laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion (41%) of participants. The cohort study and qualitative study demonstrated that participant willingness to receive treatment was strongly influenced by their clinician. Fidelity to oral doxycycline was only 52% after 3 months due to lack of effectiveness, participant preference and adverse effects. Delays receiving procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants commencing laser therapy and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Treatment switching was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events. Daily pain score text messages were initiated in 110 participants. Daily responses reduced over time with greatest concordance during the first 14 days. Limitations: It was not possible to characterise conventional surgery due to a low number of participants. Conclusion: The Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study established deroofing and laser treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the United Kingdom and developed a network of 10 sites for subsequent hidradenitis suppurativa randomised controlled trials. Future work: The consensus workshop prioritised laser treatment and deroofing as interventions for future randomised controlled trials, in some cases combined with drug treatment. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN69985145. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/35/64) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 30. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

The Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study introduced deroofing of skin tunnels and laser treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa and found that these are preferred interventions for future trials compared with oral antibiotics or conventional surgery.

Advances in surgical treatment of hidradenitis suppurative. / åŒ–è„“æ€§æ±—è ºç‚Žå¤–ç§‘æ²»ç–—ç ”ç©¶è¿›å±•.

Hidradenitis suppurative is a chronic, refractory and recurrent dermatological disease. The disease should be managed by targeted surgical intervention on the basis of medical treatment. Currently, the surgical treatment methods include local treatments like incision and drainage, unroofing, laser therapy, intense pulsed light therapy, photodynamic therapy, as well as complete lesion resection such as skin-tissue saving excision with electrosurgical peeling and extended excision. The clearance range, therapeutic effect, postoperative complications, and recurrence risk vary among the different treatment methods. Local treatments cause less damage, but have high recurrence rates, and are mainly for mild to moderate hidradenitis suppurative patients. Complete lesion resections have relatively low recurrence rates, but may bring more surgical injuries, and postoperative reconstructions are needed, which are mainly for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurative patients. In this article, the surgical treatment principles and various surgical treatment methods of hidradenitis suppurative are reviewed, to provide a reference for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease in clinical practice.