Sociodemographics and the impact of a colostomy to indigent families and children with colorectal disorders in Honduras.

INTRODUCTION: To describe the social impact of a colostomy on indigent families and affected children with anorectal malformations (ARM) or Hirschsprung's disease (HD) in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, we specifically targeted very low-income households that attended an international medical brigade for ARM and HD in 2016. METHODS: The impact of a colostomy on the families and children's daily life was analyzed by personal interviews with a questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty families with children were included in the study. Children's age ranged from 5 months to 27years (median 2.31). Annual income was reported to be less than $500 USD in 42.8%. Impairment of daily family life by the colostomy was reported in 85%. Parents of preschool children younger than 7 years are more affected than parents of older children, whereas children older than 7 years reported on more social problems. Moreover, 50% of the school-aged children did not attend school owing to issues directly related to their colostomy. DISCUSSION: Colostomies for children in the low middle-income country Honduras have significant social and economic implications for low-income families. In ARM and HD, medical brigades can offer help for definitive surgical repair to overcome and shorten the period of a colostomy presence to improve physical and psychosocial impairment, especially when performed before the children reach the school age. TYPE OF STUDY: Cost Effectiveness Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Population-based study shows that Hirschsprung disease does not have a negative impact on education and income.

AIM: Hirschsprung disease is a multifactorial disease, which is mainly treated during childhood. There is a risk of impaired bowel function for a long time after surgery, and its impact on adult life has not been well studied. This study assessed whether having Hirschsprung disease affected social parameters such as educational level and income. METHODS: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included all patients with Hirschsprung disease, registered in the Swedish National Patient Register from 1964 and 2013, who were each matched by age and sex to ten individuals randomly selected from the Swedish Population Register. The study outcomes were the highest educational level and individual disposable income in 2013 registered by Statistics Sweden. RESULTS: The study comprised 389 patients and 3847 controls, both 76% male, with a median age of 25 years. There were no statistically significant differences in highest educational level between the groups (p = 0.327). The median individual disposable income was 142 200 (0-817 200) Swedish Krona in the patient group and 159 000 (0-3 418 900) in the control group (p = 0.615). CONCLUSION: The highest educational level and the individual disposable income did not differ between patients with Hirschsprung disease and controls, indicating that the disease had a low impact on these parameters.

Comparing cost and complications of primary and staged surgical repair of neonatally diagnosed Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We questioned whether primary surgical correction of neonatally diagnosed Hirschsprung's Disease (HD) incurs higher costs or increased incidence of adverse events (AE) when compared with staged repair. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all neonates diagnosed with HD at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Sixty subjects fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Twenty-seven neonates had primary repair, and 33 had staged repair. We measured inflation-adjusted total costs, direct costs, and total charges and 6 AE between the 2 groups. A generalized linear model was used to examine differences between group variables. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in costs or AE between primary and staged repair. Inflation-adjusted median financial data for primary or staged repair were, respectively, as follows: total costs, $35,670 vs $38,538 (P = .617); direct costs, $18,453 vs $23,937 (P = .128); total charges, $107,315 vs $102,492 (P = .690). Adverse events occurred in 48% of primary repair subjects and 36% of staged repair subjects (P = .434); no single AE differed significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistical evidence that primary neonatal correction of HD adds cost or risk of AE when compared with a traditional staged approach in neonates who met inclusion criteria.

The influence of Down's syndrome on the management and outcome of children with Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND: Children with Down's syndrome (DS) have a reportedly poorer outcome after treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HD) compared with control children. Because of overall improvements in their management, the authors hypothesized that the diagnosis of DS would not influence outcome after the management of HD. METHODS: Consecutive children with HD (1995 through 2002) were collected prospectively then divided retrospectively into those with DS and controls (C). Patients who underwent surgery at another institution and those with total colonic aganglionosis were excluded. RESULTS: Of 66 patients, 9 had DS. Mean age at diagnosis, gender, racial distribution, gestational age, and proximity to our center were similar between groups. Presenting symptoms, location of the transition zone, and type of initial operation were similar. Patients with DS had significantly more comorbidities than controls, which generated significantly greater treatment costs and a higher mortality rate. However, with an average of 22 months of follow-up, the overall outcome including postoperative complications, enterocolitis, and constipation was similar. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in contrast to earlier reports, DS has minimal influence on surgical outcome of patients with HD. Although the overall cost of treating patients with DS is greater, this mainly reflects the impact of managing comorbidities.

One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease: a comparison of the transanal and open approaches.

PURPOSE: The authors reviewed their experience using the transanal Soave technique, to determine (1) if it offers any advantages over the standard open approach and (2) whether routine laparoscopic visualization is necessary. METHODS: The case reports of 37 consecutive children less than 3 years old undergoing Soave pull-through were reviewed. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had total colon disease or had a previous colostomy. The patients were divided into 3 groups: open Soave (OS, n = 13), transanal Soave with routine laparoscopic visualization (LVS, n = 9), and transanal Soave with selective laparoscopy or minilaparotomy (TAS, n = 15). Cost was calculated based on hospital stay, operating room time, and use of laparoscopic equipment. RESULTS: In the TAS group, suspicion of a longer segment led to the selective use of laparoscopy with or without biopsy in 2 children, and the use of a small umbilical incision for mobilization of the splenic flexure in 2. There were no differences among groups with respect to age, weight, gender, transition zone, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, enterocolitis, or stricture or cuff narrowing. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the OS group (median, 7 days; range, 3 to 47) than the LVS (median, 1; range 1 to 6) or TAS (median, 1, range, 1 to 3) groups. Cost (in thousands of dollars) was also higher in the OS group (median, 6.9; range, 3.9-25.7) than the LVS (median, 3.9; range, 3.6 to 6.4) or TAS (median, 3.4; range, 2.2 to 9.4) groups. Repeat surgery was necessary for 4 OS patients: 2 adhesive small bowel obstructions (1 of whom died), 1 twisted pull-through, and 1 recurrent aganglionosis. Three TAS patients required repeat surgery: 1 twisted pull-through, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 cuff narrowing. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the transanal pull-through is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and lower cost than the open approach, without an increased risk of complications. Because there is no intraabdominal dissection, there probably is a lower incidence of adhesive bowel obstruction. Routine laparoscopic visualization or minilaparotomy is not necessary but should be used in children who are at higher risk for long segment disease.

Analysis of the costs of surgery for Hirschsprung's disease: one-stage laparoscopic pull-through versus two-stage Duhamel procedure.

The purpose of this report is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a single-stage laparoscopic pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease compared to the traditional two-stage Duhamel procedure. In this series of 33 children, the length of hospitalization (2.5 +/- 3.5 vs 10.6 +/- 3.9, p < 0.01), cost (19,088 +/- 13,075 vs 34,110 +/- 19,443, p < 0.05), and complications were all significantly less with the laparoscopic assisted pull-through compared to the more traditional open approach.