Guided rational design with scaffold hopping leading to novel histamine H3 receptor ligands.

During the past decades, histamine H3 receptors have received widespread attention in pharmaceutical research due to their involvement in pathophysiology of several diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders. In this context, blocking of these receptors is of paramount importance in progression of such diseases. In the current investigation, novel histamine H3 receptor ligands were designed by exploiting scaffold-hopping drug-design strategy. We inspected the designed molecules in terms of ADME properties, drug-likeness, as well as toxicity profiles. Additionally molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies were performed to predict binding mode and binding free energy calculations, respectively. Among the designed structures, we selected compound d2 and its demethylated derivative as examples for synthesis and affinity measurement. In vitro binding assays of the synthesized molecules demonstrated that d2 has lower binding affinity (Ki = 2.61 µM) in radioligand displacement assay to hH3R than that of demethylated form (Ki = 12.53 µM). The newly designed compounds avoid of any toxicity predictors resulted from extended in silico and experimental studies, can offer another scaffold for histamine H3R antagonists for further structure-activity relationship studies.

Quantitative electrophysiological monitoring of anti-histamine drug effects on live cells via reusable sensor platforms.

We demonstrated the quantitative electrophysiological monitoring of histamine and anti-histamine drug effects on live cells via reusable sensor platforms based on carbon nanotube transistors. This method enabled us to monitor the real-time electrophysiological responses of a single HeLa cell to histamine with different concentrations. The measured electrophysiological responses were attributed to the activity of histamine type 1 receptors on a HeLa cell membrane by histamine. Furthermore, the effects of anti-histamine drugs such as cetirizine or chlorphenamine on the electrophysiological activities of HeLa cells were also evaluated quantitatively. Significantly, we utilized only a single device to monitor the responses of multiple HeLa cells to each drug, which allowed us to quantitatively analyze the antihistamine drug effects on live cells without errors from the device-to-device variation in device characteristics. Such quantitative evaluation capability of our method would promise versatile applications such as drug screening and nanoscale bio sensor researches.

Discovery and Preclinical Validation of [(11)C]AZ13153556, a Novel Probe for the Histamine Type 3 Receptor.

UNLABELLED: The histamine type 3 receptor (H3) is a G protein-coupled receptor implicated in several disorders of the central nervous system. Herein, we describe the radiolabeling and preclinical evaluation of a candidate radioligand for the H3 receptor, 4-(1S,2S)-2-(4-cyclobutylpiperazine-1-carbonyl)cyclopropyl]-N-methyl-benzamide (5), and its comparison with one of the frontrunner radioligands for H3 imaging, namely, GSK189254 (1). Compounds 1 and 5 were radiolabeled with tritium and carbon-11 for in vitro and in vivo imaging experiments. The in vitro binding of [(3)H]1 and [(3)H]5 was examined by (i) saturation binding to rat and nonhuman primate brain tissue homogenate and (ii) in vitro autoradiography on tissue sections from rat, guinea pig, and human brain. The in vivo binding of [(11)C]1 and [(11)C]5 was examined by PET imaging in mice and nonhuman primates. Bmax values obtained from Scatchard analysis of [(3)H]1 and [(3)H]5 binding were in good agreement. Autoradiography with [(3)H]5 on rat, guinea pig, and human brain slices showed specific binding in regions known to be enhanced in H3 receptors, a high degree of colocalization with [(3)H]1, and virtually negligible nonspecific binding in tissue. PET measurements in mice and nonhuman primates demonstrated that [(11)C]5 binds specifically and reversibly to H3 receptors in vivo with low nonspecific binding in brain tissue. Whereas [(11)C]1 showed similar binding characteristics in vivo, the binding kinetics appeared faster for [(11)C]5 than for [(11)C]1. CONCLUSIONS: [(11)C]5 has suitable properties for quantification of H3 receptors in nonhuman primate brain and has the potential to offer improved binding kinetics in man compared to [(11)C]1.

Cherry-picked ligands at histamine receptor subtypes.

Histamine, a biogenic amine, is considered as a principle mediator of multiple physiological effects through binding to its H1, H2, H3, and H4 receptors (H1-H4Rs). Currently, the HRs have gained attention as important targets for the treatment of several diseases and disorders ranging from allergy to Alzheimer's disease and immune deficiency. Accordingly, medicinal chemistry studies exploring histamine-like molecules and their physicochemical properties by binding and interacting with the four HRs has led to the development of a diversity of agonists and antagonists that display selectivity for each HR subtype. An overview on H1-R4Rs and developed ligands representing some key steps in development is provided here combined with a short description of structure-activity relationships for each class. Main chemical diversities, pharmacophores, and pharmacological profiles of most innovative H1-H4R agonists and antagonists are highlighted. Therefore, this overview should support the rational choice for the optimal ligand selection based on affinity, selectivity and efficacy data in biochemical and pharmacological studies. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Histamine Receptors'.

Drug-likeness approach of 2-aminopyrimidines as histamine H3 receptor ligands.

A small series of compounds containing derivatives of 2,4-diamino- and 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine (compounds 2-7) was synthesized and tested for binding affinity to human histamine H3 receptors (hH3Rs) stably expressed in HEK-293 cells and human H4Rs (hH4Rs) co-expressed with Gαi2 and Gß1γ2 subunits in Sf9 cells. Working in part from the lead compound 6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-N (4)-(3-(piperidin-1-yl)propyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (compound 1) with unsatisfactory affinity and selectivity to hH3Rs, our structure-activity relationship studies revealed that replacement of 4-methylpiperazino by N-benzylamine and substitution of an amine group at the 2-position of the 2-aminopyrimidine core structure with 3-piperidinopropoxyphenyl moiety as an hH3R pharmacophore resulted in N (4)-benzyl-N (2)-(4-(3-(piperidin-1-yl)propoxy)phenyl)pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (compound 5) with high hH3R affinity (k(i) =4.49 ± 1.25 nM) and H3R receptor subtype selectivity of more than 6,500×. Moreover, initial metric analyses were conducted based on their target-oriented drug-likeness for predictively quantifying lipophilicity, ligand efficiency, lipophilicity-dependent ligand efficiency, molecular size-independent efficiency, and topological molecular polar surface. As to the development of potential H3R ligands, results showed that integration of the hH3R pharmacophore in hH4R-affine structural scaffolds resulted in compounds with high hH3R affinity (4.5-650 nM), moderate to low hH4R affinity (4,500-30,000 nM), receptor subtype selectivity (ratio hH4R/hH3R; 8-6,500), and promising calculated drug-likeness properties.

Histaminergic pharmacology of homo-oligomeric ß3 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors characterized by surface plasmon resonance biosensor technology.

A surface plasmon resonance biosensor assay was established for studying the interactions of 51 histaminergic and 15 GABAergic ligands with homo-oligomeric ß3 GABA(A) receptors. Detergent solubilized receptors were successfully immobilized via affinity-capture on biosensor surfaces. The interaction kinetics of both histaminergic and GABAergic ligands were very rapid but affinities could be determined by steady-state analysis. Binding of several GABAergic ligands was observed, in agreement with previous data. Histamine and 16 histaminergic ligands were detected to directly bind to ß3 GABA(A) receptors with micromolar affinity (K(D)<300 µM), thus extending previous evidence that ß3 GABA(A) receptors can interact with histaminergic ligands. Histamine exhibited an affinity for these receptors comparable to that for human histamine type 1 (H1) or type 2 (H2) receptors. Furthermore, 13 of these histaminergic ligands appeared to compete with histamine. The discovery that H2, H3 and H4 receptor ligands interact with ß3 receptors indicates a unique histaminergic pharmacology of these receptors. Due to their low affinity for the homo-pentameric ß3 receptors these histaminergic drugs are not expected to modulate these receptors at clinically relevant concentrations. The results support the use of the new biosensor assay for the identification of drugs interacting with full length receptors and for fragment-based drug discovery of high affinity ligands for ß3 receptors. Drugs with high affinity and selectivity for these receptors can be used to clarify the question whether ß3 receptors do exist in the brain, and provide new avenues for the development of therapeutically active compounds targeting this novel histamine binding site.

Discovery of novel histamine H4 and serotonin transporter ligands using the topological feature tree descriptor.

Ligand-based approaches are particularly important in the hit identification process of drug discovery when no structural information on the target is available. Pharmacophore descriptors that use a topological representation of the ligands are usually fast enough to screen large compound libraries effectively when seeking novel lead candidates. One example of this kind is the Feature Tree descriptor, a reduced graph representation implemented in the FTrees software. In this study, we tested the screening efficiency of FTrees by both retrospective and prospective screens using known histamine H4 antagonists and serotonin transporter (SERT) inhibitors as query molecules. Our results demonstrate that FTrees can effectively find actives. Particularly when combined with a subsequent 2D fingerprint-based diversity selection, FTrees was found to be extremely effective at discovering a diverse set of scaffolds. Prospective screening of our in-house compound deck provided several novel H4 and SERT ligands that could serve as suitable starting points for further optimization.

Total synthesis and biological evaluation of the marine bromopyrrole alkaloid dispyrin: elucidation of discrete molecular targets with therapeutic potential.

The first total synthesis of dispyrin, a recently reported bromopyrrole alkaloid from Agelas dispar with an unprecedented bromopyrrole tyramine motif, was achieved in three steps on a gram scale (68.4% overall). No biological activity was reported for dispyrin, so we evaluated synthetic dispyrin against>200 discrete molecular targets in radioligand binding and functional assays. Unlike most marine natural products, dispyrin (1) possesses no antibacterial or anticancer activity, but was found to be a potent ligand and antagonist of several therapeutically relevant GPCRs, the alpha1D and alpha2A adrenergic receptors and the H2 and H3 histamine receptors.

An efficient multigram synthesis of the potent histamine H3 antagonist GT-2331 and the reassessment of the absolute configuration.

GT-2331 is a potent histamine H(3) antagonist which has entered clinical trials. Efficient multigram syntheses of this compound and its enantiomer are described. The literature reports that GT-2331 is the dextrorotatory (+), more potent, enantiomer of 4-[2-(5,5-dimethylhex-1-ynyl)cyclopropyl]-1H-imidazole with the absolute configuration of (1R,2R)-1. However, we found that the dextrorotatory, more potent, enantiomer of 4-[2-(5,5-dimethylhex-1-ynyl)cyclopropyl]-1H-imidazole has the (1S,2S) absolute configuration. We suggest a reconsideration of the absolute configuration of GT-2331.

Determinants of histamine recognition: implications for the design of antihistamines.

Towards understanding how histamine, a vital neurotransmitter, can perform multiple physiological tasks, an analysis of the different proteins that bind histamine is reported here. Their structural comparison reveals conformational rigidity of histamine. Yet, flexibility in the modes of histamine binding has been observed, which appears to suit specific biological roles of the proteins. These results will be helpful in developing specific antihistamines and also in understanding the pharmacological and toxicological profiles of existing antihistamines.