Repositioning of histamine H1 receptor antagonist: Doxepin inhibits viropexis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike pseudovirus by blocking ACE2.

The spread of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been intensifying in the past year, posing a huge threat to global health. There is an urgent need for effective drugs and vaccines to fight the COVID-19, but their advent may not be quite fast. Drug repurposing is a feasible strategy in the current situation, which could greatly shorten drug development time and help to response quickly to the novel virus outbreak. It has been reported that histamine H1 receptor antagonists have broad-spectrum antiviral effects. Therefore, in this study, we aim to screen potential drugs among histamine H1 receptor antagonists that may inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on the model of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) overexpressing HEK293T cell membrane chromatography (CMC), five FDA-approved histamine H1 receptor antagonists were found to have bioaffinity to ACE2. Then we determined the interaction between these drugs and ACE2 by frontal analysis and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), which consistently demonstrated that these hits bind to ACE2 at micromolar levels of affinity. Through the pseudovirus assay, we finally identified that doxepin could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudovirus from entering the ACE2-expressing cell, reducing the infection rate to 25.82%. These preliminary results indicate that the histamine H1 receptor antagonist, doxepin, is a viable drug candidate for clinical trials. Therefore, we hope the work timely provides rational help for developing anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs to control the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2.

H1-antihistamines as antischistosomal drugs: in vitro and in vivo studies.

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is a socioeconomically devastating parasitic infection afflicting hundreds of millions of people and animals worldwide. It is the most important helminth infection, and its treatment relies solely on the drug praziquantel. Oral H1-antihistamines are available worldwide, and these agents are among the most widely used of all medications in children and adults. Given the importance of the drug repositioning strategy, we evaluated the antischistosomal properties of the H1-antihistamine drugs commonly used in clinical practices. METHODS: Twenty-one antihistamine drugs were initially screened against adult schistosomes ex vivo. Subsequently, we investigated the anthelmintic properties of these antihistamines in a murine model of schistosomiasis for both early and chronic S. mansoni infections at oral dosages of 400 mg/kg single dose or 100 mg/kg daily for five consecutive days. We also demonstrated and described the ability of three antihistamines to induce tegumental damage in schistosomes through the use of scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: From phenotypic screening, we found that desloratadine, rupatadine, promethazine, and cinnarizine kill adult S. mansoni in vitro at low concentrations (5-15 µM). These results were further supported by scanning electron microscopy analysis. In an animal model, rupatadine and cinnarizine revealed moderate worm burden reductions in mice harboring either early or chronic S. mansoni infection. Egg production, a key mechanism for both transmission and pathogenesis, was also markedly inhibited by rupatadine and cinnarizine, and a significant reduction in hepatomegaly and splenomegaly was recorded. Although less effective, desloratadine also revealed significant activity against the adult and juvenile parasites. CONCLUSIONS: Although the worm burden reductions achieved are all only moderate, comparatively, treatment with any of the three antihistamines is more effective in early infection than praziquantel. On the other hand, the clinical use of H1-antihistamines for the treatment of schistosomiasis is highly unlikely.

Treatment of Recalcitrant Chronic Urticaria With Nonsedating Antihistamines: Is There Evidence for Updosing?

Los antihistamínicos no sedantes constituyen el tratamiento de primera elección para todas las formas de urticaria. En pacientes con urticaria recalcitrante que no responden a dosis convencionales de antihistamínicos los lineamientos actuales recomiendan el incremento de la dosis hasta 4 veces hasta obtener un mejor control de la enfermedad. Aunque el número de investigaciones es reducido, existen datos convincentes de estudios controlados para cetirizina, levocetirizina y desloratadina que sustentan el uso de dosis superiores en pacientes no respondedores. Se ha observado que la utilización de mayores dosis de antihistamínicos no se asocia con un incremento de la frecuencia de efectos adversos o de somnolencia. Se requieren estudios adicionales con otros antihistamínicos de segunda generación para mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes que presentan urticaria severa recalcitrante (AU)

Nonsedating antihistamines are the first-choice treatment for all forms of urticaria. In patients with recalcitrant urticaria who do not respond to conventional doses of antihistamines, current guidelines recommend increasing doses by up to 4 times in order to obtain better control of the disease. Although few studies have been conducted, there are convincing data from controlled trials for cetirizine, levocetirizine, and desloratadine that support the use of increased doses of such drugs in unresponsive patients. The use of higher doses of antihistamines has not been associated with increased adverse effects or somnolence. More studies with other second-generation antihistamines are required in order to improve the treatment of patients with severe, recalcitrant urticaria (AU)

Cardiotoxic effects of antihistamines: from basics to clinics (...and back).

Drug-induced arrhythmias, particularly those caused by a prolonged QT interval, have become a critical safety issue for compound selection during development by pharmaceutical companies and for health care regulators. The last two decades have witnessed enormous progress in the definition of the clinical conditions that facilitate the occurrence of such serious adverse effects, of its molecular basis, and in the preclinical strategies aimed at early identification of the cardiotoxic liability of compounds undergoing investigation or already used in the clinic. Moreover, despite the fact that acquired factors play an obvious role in drug-induced arrhythmias, it has become evident that the disease is often manifested upon the interaction of strong environmental stressors with specific genetic determinants of the affected individuals; in that sense, few examples can illustrate the existing interaction between acquired and genetic factors in disease manifestation better than drug-induced arrhythmogenesis. Progress in this field has been mainly driven by a strong interaction among various disciplines, including medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, electrophysiology, molecular genetics, and clinical cardiology; such an interdisciplinary approach has often generated unexpected discoveries of great clinical value, allowing clinicians to drive drug selection toward compounds of proven efficacy and safety. Historically, studies on antihistamines have paved the way for much of our current understanding of the mechanisms and problems associated with QT prolongation and drug-induced arrhythmogenesis; therefore, in this perspective, we will attempt to summarize how basic research studies have helped the interpretation of clinically relevant phenomena (from basics to clinics...) and how this information has prompted new emphasis in preclinical studies aimed at predicting the cardiotoxic potential of compounds (...and back). The current availability of several strategies provided with great predictive potential, together with an increased awareness of physicians, pharmaceutical industries, and health care regulators to this potentially serious cardiovascular side effect, has significantly decreased the risk associated with drug-induced arrhythmias caused by drugs newly introduced into the market; nevertheless, given the large number of cases of QT prolongation still occurring during treatment with a wide variety of congeners, it seems appropriate to review the issue of the cardiotoxic actions of antihistamines, as a better comprehension of the underlying mechanisms and risk factors is likely to contribute to the improvement of the risk/benefit ratio for pharmacological treatment in several therapeutic areas.

Synthesis and pharmacological investigation of novel 4-(2-methylphenyl)-1-substituted-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinazolin-5-ones as new class of H(1)-antihistaminic agents.

A series of novel 1-substituted-4-(2-methylphenyl)-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinazolin-5-ones were synthesized by the cyclization of 2-hydrazino-3-(2-methylphenyl)-3H-quinazolin-4-one with various one carbon donors. The starting material 2-hydrazino-3-(2-methylphenyl)-3H-quinazolin-4-one was synthesized from 2-methyl aniline by a novel innovative route. The title compounds were tested for their in vivo H(1)-antihistaminic activity on guinea pigs; all the tested compounds protected the animals from histamine-induced bronchospasm significantly. Compound 1-methyl-4-(2-methylphenyl)-4H-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinazolin-5-one (II) emerged as the most active compound of the series and it is more potent (72.45%) when compared to the reference standard chlorpheniramine maleate (71%). Compound II showed negligible sedation (11%) when compared to chlorpheniramine maleate (30%). Hence it could serve as the prototype molecule for further development as a new class of H(1)-antihistaminic agents.

[Molecular imaging of histamine receptors in the human brain].

Brain histamine is involved in a wide range of physiological functions such as regulation of sleep-wake cycle, arousal, appetite control, cognition, learning and memory mainly through the 4 receptor subtypes: H1, H2, H3 and H4. Neurons producing histamine, histaminergic neurons, are exclusively located in the tuberomammillary nucleus of the posterior hypothalamus and are transmitting histamine to almost all regions of the brain. Roles of brain histamine have been studied using animals including knock-out mice and human subjects. For clinical studies, molecular imaging technique such as positron emission tomography (PET), with ligands such as [11C]doxepin and [11C]pyrilamine, has been a useful tool. A series of clinical studies on histamine H1 antagonists, or antihistamines, have demonstrated that antihistamines can be classified into sedative, mildly-sedative and non-sedative drugs according to their blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, showing apparent clinical usefulness regarding QOL, work efficiency and traffic safety of allergic patients. PET has also been used for elucidation of aging effects and pathophysiological roles of histaminergic nervous system in various neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and depression, where H1 receptor binding potentials were lower than age-matched healthy controls. It has been also demonstrated that brain histamine functions as an endogenous anti-epileptic. In addition, H3 receptors are located in the presynaptic sites of not only histaminergic nerves but also in other nervous systems such as serotonergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic systems, and to be regulating secretion of various neurotransmitters. Nowadays, H3 receptors have been thought to be a new target of drug treatment of various neuropsychiatric disorders. There are still many research topics to be investigated regarding molecular imaging of histamine and histamine receptors. The authors hope that this line of research contributes more for the promotion of QOL in patients and people in daily lives.

In vivo antimuscarinic actions of the third generation antihistaminergic agent, desloratadine.

BACKGROUND: Muscarinic receptor mediated adverse effects, such as sedation and xerostomia, significantly hinder the therapeutic usefulness of first generation antihistamines. Therefore, second and third generation antihistamines which effectively antagonize the H1 receptor without significant affinity for muscarinic receptors have been developed. However, both in vitro and in vivo experimentation indicates that the third generation antihistamine, desloratadine, antagonizes muscarinic receptors. To fully examine the in vivo antimuscarinic efficacy of desloratadine, two murine and two rat models were utilized. The murine models sought to determine the efficacy of desloratadine to antagonize muscarinic agonist induced salivation, lacrimation, and tremor. Desloratadine's effect on the cardiovascular system was explored in both rodent models. RESULTS: In the pithed rat, both desloratadine (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and the muscarinic M2 selective antagonist, methoctramine (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.), inhibited negative inotropic (left ventricular dP/dt) effects caused by oxotremorine, a nonselective muscarinic agonist (p < 0.05). Negative chronotropic effects caused by oxotremorine were inhibited by desloratadine, methoctramine, and the muscarinic M3 selective antagonist, 4-DAMP (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.). A late positive inotropic event observed after the initial decrease was inhibited by all three test compounds with desloratadine and 4-DAMP being the most efficacious. In the conscious animal, inhibition of baroreflex-mediated bradycardia was evaluated. Unlike atropine (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.), desloratadine did not alter this bradycardia. The antimuscarinic action of desloratadine on salivation, lacrimation, and tremor was also explored. In urethane-anesthetized (1.5 g/kg, i.p.) male ICR mice (25-35 g) desloratadine (1.0, 5.0 mg/kg) did not inhibit oxotremorine-induced (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) salivation, unlike atropine (0.5 mg/kg) and 4-DAMP (1.0 mg/kg). In conscious mice, desloratadine failed to inhibit oxotremorine-induced (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) salivation, lacrimation, and tremor. However, desloratadine did inhibit oxotremorine-induced tremor in phenylephrine pretreated animals. CONCLUSION: The presented data demonstrate that the third generation antihistamine, desloratadine, does not significantly antagonize peripheral muscarinic receptors mediating salivation and lacrimation, therefore, xerostomia and dry eyes should not be observed with therapeutic use of desloratadine. Our data also indicate when administered to a patient with a compromised blood-brain barrier, desloratadine may cause sedation. Patients with compromised cardiovascular systems should be closely monitored when administered desloratadine based on our results that desloratadine has the ability to interfere with normal cardiovascular function mediated by muscarinic receptors.

Antihistamines in dermatology.

Along with antibiotics, antihistamines are the most widely used systemic drugs in dermatology. This is attributable to the major role played by histamine in common diseases such as urticaria and atopic eczema. Of the currently recognised four subtypes of G protein-coupled histamine receptors, only the H1 and H2 subtypes have been positively identified in human skin. Traditionally believed to be competitive antagonists of histamine, H1 and H2 antihistamines are now considered to behave as inverse agonists. By consensus, H1 antihistamines are classified as 'first generation' (associated with troublesome side-effects including somnolence, anti-adrenergic and atropine-like actions) and 'second-generation' compounds (in which these side-effects are reduced or absent). The main indications for H1 antihistamines in skin are suppression of pruritus in urticaria and atopic eczema, both of which are associated with increased mast cell numbers and tissue histamine levels. However the evidence basis for use in atopic eczema is ambiguous and controversial, even though these drugs are widely used in practice. Currently, significant side-effects are mainly confined to the first-generation compounds and are especially troublesome in the elderly. Psychomotor impairment may persist throughout the day following administration. Anti-cholinergic and anti-alpha-adrenergic blockade and cardiotoxicity (torsade de pointes) may also occur with first-generation antihistamines. Two early low-sedation second-generation antihistamines caused arrhythmias in a small number of patients but these compounds have now been withdrawn. Generally, the second-generation H1 antihistamines are well tolerated.

Comparative study of acute effects of single doses of fexofenadine, olopatadine, d-chlorpheniramine and placebo on psychomotor function in healthy volunteers.

Since most classical (first-generation) antihistamines have undesirable sedative effects on the central nervous system (CNS), newer (second-generation) antihistamines have been developed to relieve the sedative effects and to improve the patient's quality of life. However, the psychomotor profiles of second-generation antihistamines are not fully elucidated. In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the acute effects of single doses of second-generation antihistamines, fexofenadine (120 mg) and olopatadine (10 mg), on cognitive and psychomotor performance were investigated in comparison with those of placebo and d-chlorpheniramine (4 mg), a first-generation antihistamine, using objective and subjective assessments, in 11 healthy Japanese volunteers. In a battery of psychomotor tests, d-chlorpheniramine impaired tracking ability in the compensatory tracking task and caused a reduction in behavioural activity as continuously measured by wrist actigraphy. Olopatadine, like d-chlorpheniramine, reduced the behavioural activity, while fexofenadine had no effect in any of the tests. No significant changes in the subjects' self-ratings of drowsiness were found with the three antihistamines. These results suggest that d-chlorpheniramine and olopatadine, but not fexofenadine, produce sedative effects on psychomotor performance, and that the CNS profile of fexofenadine is different from that of olopatadine.

[Safety of new antihistamines]. / Bezpieczenstwo stosowania nowych leków przeciwhistaminowych.

In this paper the new antihistamines: fexofenadine, desloratadine, norastemizole, levocetirizine etc. are presented. The toxicity and adverse effect of these drugs are discussed with special regard to interaction with other drugs and their influence on sedation and circulatory system.

Improved strategies and new treatment options for allergic rhinitis.

Primary principles relevant to the clinical management of allergic rhinitis include (1) avoidance of allergens and triggering factors, (2) use of appropriate pharmacotherapy, (3) evaluation regarding need for and appropriate use of immunotherapy, and (4) patient education and follow-up. Currently available pharmacotherapeutic options include oral and topical (intranasal) decongestants and corticosteroids, mast cell stabilizers, intranasal anticholinergics, and antihistamines. Future therapeutic options include leukotriene modifiers and anti-IgE antibodies.

Cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and antiasthmatic drug products for over-the-counter human use; final monograph for combination drug products. Final rule.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a final rule in the form of a final monograph that establishes conditions under which over-the-counter (OTC) cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and antiasthmatic (cough-cold) combination drug products are generally recognized as safe and effective and not misbranded as part of its ongoing review of OTC drug products. FDA is issuing this final rule after considering public comments on the agency's proposed regulation (tentative final monograph) and new data and information on OTC cough- cold combination drug products that have come to the agency's attention.

Chronic idiopathic urticaria treatment.

Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is a common skin condition that affects 0.1-3 % of people in the USA and Europe and accounts for nearly 75 % of all chronic urticaria cases. Up to 40 % of patients who have chronic urticaria for more than 6 months still have urticarial wheals 10 years later. The therapeutic management should first be oriented towards palliation of symptoms. A 2 % solution of ephedrine as a local spray is very useful for oropharyngeal edema. H1 antihistamines with a low potential for sedation are the most important first-line treatment. Combinations of various antihistamines may be useful in suppressing symptomatology. These include: a) First generation H1 antihistamines; b) Combinations of first and second generations using non-sedating agents in the morning and first generation drugs at night; c) Combinations of second generation antihistamines; d) Combination of doxepin with a first or second generation antihistamine; e) Combination of an H2 anti-receptor antihistamine (eg, cimetidine or ranitidine) with a first or second generation antihistamine. Preliminary reports suggest that desloratadine and anti-leukotrienes may be effective in treating some patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.

[Anti-allergy therapy in children]. / Les thérapeutiques anti-allergiques chez l'enfant.

The discovery of the physiopathological mechanisms of asthma and the diseases of allergy has allowed the development of many symptomatic therapeutical perspectives. We review below the mechanisms of actions, routes of administration, secondary effects, dosages and indications for different commercialised anti-allergy medications. A better understanding of the pharmacology of the different medications should produce optimisation of the treatment of the allergic child.

Mirtazepine: heir apparent to amitriptyline?

"What's new in therapeutics?" will examine and evaluate drugs that may have a place in hospice, palliative, and long-term care. Mirtazepine will be examined and evaluated. Mirtazepine is a potential alternative anti-depressant with multiple additional benefits. It is an atypical anti-depressant, which has both noradrenergic and specific serotonergic receptor antagonism (NaSSa), and a unique pharmacological profile. Mirtazepine appears to be a "designer drug" for palliative medicine with a number of benefits, but cost may be a drawback.

[Antihistamines]. / Les antihistaminiques.

The H1-receptor antagonists (H1-antihistamines) are among the most widely used medications in the world. We review the molecular basis of action, pharmacology, efficacy in allergic disorders (rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, urticaria, atopic dermatitis) and adverse effects. Special advices are given for the young children, the elderly, in case of liver or renal insufficiency and during pregnancy and breast-feeding.