Utilizing a structure-based virtual screening approach to discover potential LSD1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in a variety of malignant tumors, rendering it a crucial epigenetic target for anti-tumor therapy. Therefore, the inhibition of LSD1 activity has emerged as a promising innovative therapeutic approach for targeted cancer treatment. METHODS: In our study, we employed innovative structure-based drug design methods to meticulously select compounds from the ZINC15 database. Utilizing virtual docking, we evaluated docking scores and binding modes to identify potential inhibitors. To further validate our findings, we harnessed molecular dynamic simulations and conducted meticulous biochemical experiments to deeply analyze the binding interactions between the protein and compounds. RESULTS: Our results showcased that ZINC10039815 exhibits an exquisite binding mode with LSD1, fitting perfectly into the active pocket and forming robust interactions with multiple critical residues of the protein. CONCLUSIONS: With its significant inhibitory effect on LSD1 activity, ZINC10039815 emerges as a highly promising candidate for the development of novel LSD1 inhibitors.

Structural simulation and selective inhibitor discovery study for histone demethylases KDM4E/6B from a computational perspective.

The methylation and demethylation of lysine and arginine side chains are fundamental processes in gene regulation and disease development. Histone lysine methylation, controlled by histone lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) and histone lysine demethylases (KDMs), plays a vital role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and has been implicated in diseases such as cancer and aging. This study focuses on two members of the lysine demethylase (KDM) family, KDM4E and KDM6B, which are significant in gene regulation and disease pathogenesis. KDM4E demonstrates selectivity for gene regulation, particularly concerning cancer, while KDM6B is implicated in inflammation and cancer. The study utilizes specific inhibitors, DA-24905 and GSK-J1, showcasing their exceptional selectivity for KDM4E and KDM6B, respectively. Employing an array of computational simulations, including sequence alignment, molecular docking, dynamics simulations, and free energy calculations, we conclude that although the binding cavities of KDM4E and KDM6B has high similarity, there are still some different crucial amino acid residues, indicating diverse binding forms between protein and ligands. Various interaction predominates when proteins are bound to different ligands, which also has significant effect on selective inhibition. These findings provide insights into potential therapeutic strategies for diseases by selectively targeting these KDM members.

Uncovering New Conformational States of the Substrate Binding Pocket of LSD1 Potential for Inhibitor Design via Funnel Metadynamics.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a promising therapeutic target for cancer therapy. So far, over 80 crystal structures of LSD1 in different complex states have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, which are valuable resources for performing structure-based drug design. However, among all of the crystal structures of LSD1, the substrate binding pocket, which is the most efficient druggable site for designing LSD1 inhibitors at present, is very similar no matter whether LSD1 is in the apo or any holo forms, which is inconsistent with its versatile demethylase functions. To investigate whether the substrate binding pocket is rigid or exhibits other representative conformations different from the crystal conformations that are feasible for designing new LSD1 inhibitors, we performed funnel metadynamics simulations to study the conformation dynamics of LSD1 in the binding process of two effective LSD1 inhibitors (CC-90011 and 6X0, CC-90011 undergoing clinical trials). Our results showed that the entrance of the substrate binding pocket is very flexible. Two representative entrance conformations of LSD1 counting against binding with the substrate of histone H3 were detected, which may be used for structure-based LSD1 inhibitor design. Besides, alternative optimal binding modes and prebinding modes for both inhibitors were also detected, which depicted that the key interactions changed along with the binding process. Our results should provide great help for LSD1 inhibitor design.

Targeting the LSD1/KDM1 Family of Lysine Demethylases in Cancer and Other Human Diseases.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) was the first histone demethylase discovered and the founding member of the flavin-dependent lysine demethylase family (KDM1). The human KDM1 family includes KDM1A and KDM1B, which primarily catalyze demethylation of histone H3K4me1/2. The KDM1 family is involved in epigenetic gene regulation and plays important roles in various biological and disease pathogenesis processes, including cell differentiation, embryonic development, hormone signaling, and carcinogenesis. Malfunction of many epigenetic regulators results in complex human diseases, including cancers. Regulators such as KDM1 have become potential therapeutic targets because of the reversibility of epigenetic control of genome function. Indeed, several classes of KDM1-selective small molecule inhibitors have been developed, some of which are currently in clinical trials to treat various cancers. In this chapter, we review the discovery, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms, atomic structure, genetics, biology, and pathology of the KDM1 family of lysine demethylases. Focusing on cancer, we also provide a comprehensive summary of recently developed KDM1 inhibitors and related preclinical and clinical studies to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of action and applications of these KDM1-specific inhibitors in therapeutic treatment.

The NPAC-LSD2 complex in nucleosome demethylation.

NPAC is a transcriptional co-activator widely associated with the H3K36me3 epigenetic marks present in the gene bodies. NPAC plays a fundamental role in RNA polymerase progression, and its depletion downregulates gene transcription. In this chapter, we review the current knowledge on the functional and structural features of this multi-domain protein. NPAC (also named GLYR1 or NP60) contains a PWWP motif, a chromatin binder and epigenetic reader that is proposed to weaken the DNA-histone contacts facilitating polymerase passage through the nucleosomes. The C-terminus of NPAC is a catalytically inactive dehydrogenase domain that forms a stable and rigid tetramer acting as an oligomerization module for the formation of co-transcriptional multimeric complexes. The PWWP and dehydrogenase domains are connected by a long, mostly disordered, linker that comprises putative sites for protein and DNA interactions. A short dodecapeptide sequence (residues 214-225) forms the binding site for LSD2, a flavin-dependent lysine-specific histone demethylase. This stretch of residues binds on the surface of LSD2 and facilitates the capture and processing of the H3 tail in the nucleosome context, thus promoting the H3K4me1/2 epigenetic mark removal. LSD2 is associated with other two chromatin modifiers, G9a and NSD3. The LSD2-G9a-NSD3 complex modifies the pattern of the post translational modifications deposited on histones, thus converting the relaxed chromatin into a transcriptionally refractory state after the RNA polymerase passage. NPAC is a scaffolding factor that organizes and coordinates the epigenetic activities required for optimal transcription elongation.

Chromatin Sensing by the Auxiliary Domains of KDM5C Regulates Its Demethylase Activity and Is Disrupted by X-linked Intellectual Disability Mutations.

The H3K4me3 chromatin modification, a hallmark of promoters of actively transcribed genes, is dynamically removed by the KDM5 family of histone demethylases. The KDM5 demethylases have a number of accessory domains, two of which, ARID and PHD1, lie between the segments of the catalytic domain. KDM5C, which has a unique role in neural development, harbors a number of mutations adjacent to its accessory domains that cause X-linked intellectual disability (XLID). The roles of these accessory domains remain unknown, limiting an understanding of how XLID mutations affect KDM5C activity. Through in vitro binding and kinetic studies using nucleosomes, we find that while the ARID domain is required for efficient nucleosome demethylation, the PHD1 domain alone has an inhibitory role in KDM5C catalysis. In addition, the unstructured linker region between the ARID and PHD1 domains interacts with PHD1 and is necessary for nucleosome binding. Our data suggests a model in which the PHD1 domain inhibits DNA recognition by KDM5C. This inhibitory effect is relieved by the H3 tail, enabling recognition of flanking DNA on the nucleosome. Importantly, we find that XLID mutations adjacent to the ARID and PHD1 domains break this regulation by enhancing DNA binding, resulting in the loss of specificity of substrate chromatin recognition and rendering demethylase activity lower in the presence of flanking DNA. Our findings suggest a model by which specific XLID mutations could alter chromatin recognition and enable euchromatin-specific dysregulation of demethylation by KDM5C.

Anti-Proliferative Effect of Potential LSD1/CoREST Inhibitors Based on Molecular Dynamics Model for Treatment of SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cancer Cell Line.

BACKGROUND: Lysine-specific demethylase is a demethylase enzyme that can remove methyl groups from histones H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me1/2. It is expressed in many cancers, where it impedes differentiation and contributes to cancer cell proliferation, cell metastasis and invasiveness, and is associated with inferior prognosis. LSD1 is associated with its corepressor protein CoREST, and utilizes tetrahydrofolate as a cofactor to accept CH2 from the demethylation process. The fact that the cofactor is best bound to the active site inspired us to explore its interactions to LSD1/CoREST enzyme complex utilizing molecular dynamics simulation, which aids designing novel and potent inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: In this study we minted to identify a new potential LSD1/CoREST inhibitors and test the potency and the safety of such inhibitors against human neuroblastoma and fibroblast cells lines. METHODS: We have implemented a previously derived model from the molecular dynamics simulation study and the key contacts to the active site in a subsequent structure based drug design and in-silico screening, which revealed a number of potential inhibitors toward LSD1/CoREST complex. The anti-proliferative activities of the identified compounds will be tested against neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cancer cell line which known to highly express LSD1/CoREST complex. RESULTS: In-silico mining on National Cancer Institute (NCI) database identified 55 promising and structurally diverse inhibitors. Applying the abovementioned molecular modeling procedure yielded four compounds of LSD1/CoREST inhibiters with IC50 < 2µM. The four lead compounds were tested against SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line that known to express high level of LSD1 and illustrated a potent activity with an IC50 ranging from 0.195 to 1.52µM. To estimate the toxicity of the selective leads, they were tested against normal fibroblast cells and scored a relatively high IC50 ranging from 0.303 to ≥ 100µM. CONCLUSION: Our model revealed promising inhibitors that can be used in treating cancers that overexpress the LSD1 enzyme such as the SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma.

Combination of multiple methods and views for recognition, transportation, and structure-guided modification of lysine-specific demethylase phenylcyclopropylamine inhibitor.

Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a typical histone-specific demethylase, which plays an important role in protein methylation modification. It is a member of the amine oxidase family (MAO) that specifically removes methyl groups from monomethylated H3K4, dimethylated H3K4 and H3K9 sites associated with tumorigenesis. Phenylcyclopropylamine derivatives are a class of specific LSD1 inhibitors, drawing attention due to their high efficiency. Here, extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are combined with a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) in order to design a new phenylcyclopropylamine inhibitor from multiple perspectives. In a ligand-oriented point of view, a 3D-QSAR model with comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) can be built based on the 55 phenylcyclopropylamine compounds targeting LSD1 obtained experimentally. The aromatic and piperazine rings are identified as the potential key groups regulating the activity of the compounds. In an interaction-oriented view, the representative compound is defined with the highest inhibitory efficiency. The binding and delivery mechanism and conformational dependence of activity, including channel and dynamic properties, are studied using RAMD and umbrella sampling technologies. The direct hydrogen bond and conjugated interactions are identified as a major driving force in this procedure. The dominant region of the phenylcyclopropylamine influences the free energy and detects the key residues in recognition and delivery. On the basis of both the ligand and interaction, a series of new inhibitor structures were designed, and two of them showed better efficiency. In order to select the inhibitor with a longer residence time, a comparison is conducted between the designed inhibitors and the experimentally obtained inhibitor from the perspective of static binding and dynamic delivery properties. This work creates new guidance for the phenylcyclopropylamine inhibitor design of LDS1 by combining the ligand and receptor, considering both static and dynamic properties. This scheme could be applied in other inhibitor design systems.

Promising natural lysine specific demethylase 1 inhibitors for cancer treatment: advances and outlooks.

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), a transcriptional corepressor or coactivator that serves as a demethylase of histone 3 lysine 4 and 9, has become a potential therapeutic target for cancer therapy. LSD1 mediates many cellular signaling pathways and regulates cancer cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and differentiation. Recent research has focused on the exploration of its pharmacological inhibitors. Natural products are a major source of compounds with abundant scaffold diversity and structural complexity, which have made a major contribution to drug discovery, particularly anticancer agents. In this review, we briefly highlight recent advances in natural LSD1 inhibitors over the past decade. We present a comprehensive review on their discovery and identification process, natural plant sources, chemical structures, anticancer effects, and structure-activity relationships, and finally provide our perspective on the development of novel natural LSD1 inhibitors for cancer therapy.

An Update of Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 Inhibitor: A Patent Review (2016-2020).

BACKGROUND: As a FAD (Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide) - dependent histone demethylase discovered in 2004, LSD1 (lysine-specific demethylase 1) was reported to be overexpressed in diverse tumors, regulating target genes transcription associated with cancer development. Hence, LSD1 targeted inhibitors may represent a new insight in anticancer drug discovery. For these reasons, researchers in both the pharmaceutical industry and academia have been actively pursuing LSD1 inhibitors in the quest for new anti-cancer drugs. OBJECTIVES: This review summaries patents about LSD1 inhibitors in recent 5 years in the hope of providing a reference for LSD1 researchers to develop new modulators of LSD1 with higher potency and fewer adverse effects. METHODS: This review collects LSD1 inhibitors disclosed in patents since 2016. The primary ways of patent searching are Espacenet®, Google Patents, and CNKI. RESULTS: This review covers dozens of patents related to LSD1 inhibitors in recent five years. The compound structures are mainly divided into TCP (Tranylcypromine) derivatives, imidazole derivatives, pyrimidine derivatives, and other natural products and peptides. Meanwhile, the compounds that have entered the clinical phase are also described. CONCLUSION: Most of the compounds in these patents have been subjected to activity analysis with LSD1 and multi-cell lines, showing good antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. These patents exhibited the structural diversity of LSD1 inhibitors and the potential of natural products as novel LSD1 inhibitors.

LSD1: Expanding Functions in Stem Cells and Differentiation.

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) provide a powerful model system to uncover fundamental mechanisms that control cellular identity during mammalian development. Histone methylation governs gene expression programs that play a key role in the regulation of the balance between self-renewal and differentiation of ESCs. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1, also known as KDM1A), the first identified histone lysine demethylase, demethylates H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me1/2 at target loci in a context-dependent manner. Moreover, it has also been shown to demethylate non-histone substrates playing a central role in the regulation of numerous cellular processes. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about LSD1 and the molecular mechanism by which LSD1 influences the stem cells state, including the regulatory circuitry underlying self-renewal and pluripotency.

First-in-Class Inhibitors of the Ribosomal Oxygenase MINA53.

MINA53 is a JmjC domain 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenase that catalyzes ribosomal hydroxylation and is a target of the oncogenic transcription factor c-MYC. Despite its anticancer target potential, no small-molecule MINA53 inhibitors are reported. Using ribosomal substrate fragments, we developed mass spectrometry assays for MINA53 and the related oxygenase NO66. These assays enabled the identification of 2-(aryl)alkylthio-3,4-dihydro-4-oxoypyrimidine-5-carboxylic acids as potent MINA53 inhibitors, with selectivity over NO66 and other JmjC oxygenases. Crystallographic studies with the JmjC demethylase KDM5B revealed active site binding but without direct metal chelation; however, molecular modeling investigations indicated that the inhibitors bind to MINA53 by directly interacting with the iron cofactor. The MINA53 inhibitors manifest evidence for target engagement and selectivity for MINA53 over KDM4-6. The MINA53 inhibitors show antiproliferative activity with solid cancer lines and sensitize cancer cells to conventional chemotherapy, suggesting that further work investigating their potential in combination therapies is warranted.

Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of [18F]T-914 as a Novel Positron-Emission Tomography Tracer for Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1.

Histone methylation is associated with the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) catalyzes histone demethylation in a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent manner. Thus, inhibiting LSD1 enzyme activity could offer a novel way to treat neurodevelopmental disorders. Assessing LSD1 target engagement using positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging could aid in developing therapeutic LSD1 inhibitors. In this study, PET probes based on 4-(2-aminocyclopropyl)benzamide derivatives that bind irreversibly to FAD found in LSD1 were examined. By optimizing the profiles of brain penetrance and brain-penetrant metabolites, T-914 (1g) was identified as a suitable PET tracer candidate. PET studies in nonhuman primates demonstrated that [18F]1g had heterogeneous brain uptake, which corresponded to known LSD1 expression levels. Moreover, brain uptake of [18F]1g was reduced by coadministration of unlabeled 1g, demonstrating blockable binding. These data suggest that [18F]1g warrants further investigation as a potential PET tracer candidate for assessing target engagement of LSD1.

Focused Libraries for Epigenetic Drug Discovery: The Importance of Isosteres.

Epigenetic drug discovery provides a wealth of opportunities for the discovery of new therapeutics but has been hampered by low hit rates, frequent identification of false-positives, and poor synthetic tractability. A key reason for this is that few screening collections consider the unique requirements of epigenetic targets despite significant medicinal chemistry interest. Here we analyze the suitability of some commercially available screening collections in the context of epigenetic drug discovery, with a particular focus on lysine post-translational modifications, and show that even privileged motifs found in U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs are not present in these collections. We propose that the incorporation of epigenetic bioisosteres should become central in the design of new focused screening collections and highlight some opportunities for the development of synthetic methods which may improve the tractability of hit molecules.

Molecular docking, 3D-QSAR, and molecular dynamics simulations of thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole derivatives against anticancer targets of KDM1A/LSD1.

Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone-modifying enzyme, which has been proposed as a promising target for anticancer drug development. Extensive research on LSD1 inhibitors has been performed since its discovery. In order to get more information for lead identification and optimization, we carried out a molecular modeling study on a set of 43 thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole competitive inhibitors of LSD1 using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR), molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Based on the co-crystallized conformer-based alignment (CCBA) method, 3D-QSAR model of thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole derivatives as LSD1 inhibitors was established. The significant statistics (q2 = 0.595, r2 = 0.959, r2pred = 0.846) of the 3D-QSAR indicated the good predictive power and statistical reliability of this model. Based on the corresponding contour maps six LSD1 inhibitors were designed and their activities were predicted by 3D-QSAR model. Meanwhile, molecular docking was performed to simulate the probable binding modes between ligands and LSD1 protein. The molecular interactions mainly contributions to the binding affinity for LSD1 inhibitions were further supplemented by 100 ns MD simulations and binding free energy calculation.

Modular arrangements of sequence motifs determine the functional diversity of KDM proteins.

Histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) play a vital role in regulating chromatin dynamics and transcription. KDM proteins are given modular activities by its sequence motifs with obvious roles division, which endow the complex and diverse functions. In our review, according to functional features, we classify sequence motifs into four classes: catalytic motifs, targeting motifs, regulatory motifs and potential motifs. JmjC, as the main catalytic motif, combines to Fe2+ and α-ketoglutarate by residues H-D/E-H and S-N-N/Y-K-N/Y-T/S. Targeting motifs make catalytic motifs recognize specific methylated lysines, such as PHD that helps KDM5 to demethylate H3K4me3. Regulatory motifs consist of a functional network. For example, NLS, Ser-rich, TPR and JmjN motifs regulate the nuclear localization. And interactions through the CW-type-C4H2C2-SWIRM are necessary to the demethylase activity of KDM1B. Additionally, many conservative domains that have potential functions but no deep exploration are reviewed for the first time. These conservative domains are usually amino acid-rich regions, which have great research value. The arrangements of four types of sequence motifs generate that KDM proteins diversify toward modular activities and biological functions. Finally, we draw a blueprint of functional mechanisms to discuss the modular activity of KDMs.

LSD1: more than demethylation of histone lysine residues.

Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 (LSD1) represents the first example of an identified nuclear protein with histone demethylase activity. In particular, it plays a special role in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, as it removes methyl groups from mono- and dimethylated lysine 4 and/or lysine 9 on histone H3 (H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me1/2), behaving as a repressor or activator of gene expression, respectively. Moreover, it has been recently found to demethylate monomethylated and dimethylated lysine 20 in histone H4 and to contribute to the balance of several other methylated lysine residues in histone H3 (i.e., H3K27, H3K36, and H3K79). Furthermore, in recent years, a plethora of nonhistone proteins have been detected as targets of LSD1 activity, suggesting that this demethylase is a fundamental player in the regulation of multiple pathways triggered in several cellular processes, including cancer progression. In this review, we analyze the molecular mechanism by which LSD1 displays its dual effect on gene expression (related to the specific lysine target), placing final emphasis on the use of pharmacological inhibitors of its activity in future clinical studies to fight cancer.

JMJD5 couples with CDK9 to release the paused RNA polymerase II.

More than 30% of genes in higher eukaryotes are regulated by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) promoter proximal pausing. Pausing is released by the positive transcription elongation factor complex (P-TEFb). However, the exact mechanism by which this occurs and whether phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain of Pol II is involved in the process remains unknown. We previously reported that JMJD5 could generate tailless nucleosomes at position +1 from transcription start sites (TSS), thus perhaps enable progression of Pol II. Here we find that knockout of JMJD5 leads to accumulation of nucleosomes at position +1. Absence of JMJD5 also results in loss of or lowered transcription of a large number of genes. Interestingly, we found that phosphorylation, by CDK9, of Ser2 within two neighboring heptad repeats in the carboxyl-terminal domain of Pol II, together with phosphorylation of Ser5 within the second repeat, HR-Ser2p (1, 2)-Ser5p (2) for short, allows Pol II to bind JMJD5 via engagement of the N-terminal domain of JMJD5. We suggest that these events bring JMJD5 near the nucleosome at position +1, thus allowing JMJD5 to clip histones on this nucleosome, a phenomenon that may contribute to release of Pol II pausing.

Domain cross-talk in regulation of histone modifications: Molecular mechanisms and targeting opportunities.

Functional cross-talk between the catalytic and reader domains in chromatin-modifying enzymes and protein complexes enable coordinated regulation of chromatin modification status, and consequently impacts chromatin-associated processes. ZZ domains are a recently identified class of chromatin readers that recognize the N-terminal region of histone H3 to direct and regulate acetylation activity of several histone acetylation complexes. Cross-talk between chromatin readers sensitive to methylation, and catalytic domains of methyltransferases and demethylases impacts substrate specificity, catalytic activity, and propagation of chromatin marks. Recently described allosteric ligands that target domain communication highlight the potential of domain cross-talk in the development of the next-generation of chromatin-directed therapeutics.

Nucleosome Binding by the Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) Enzyme Enables Histone H3 Demethylation.

The essential human enzyme lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) silences genes by demethylating mono- and dimethylated lysine 4 in histone H3 (H3K4me1/2). Studies of the minimal requirements for LSD1 activity are complicated by the heterogeneity of histone modification states in cells. We overcame this challenge by generating homogeneous mononucleosome substrates containing semisynthetic H3K4me2. Biophysical and biochemical assays with full-length LSD1 revealed its ability to bind and demethylate nucleosomes. Consistent with a requirement for nucleosome binding prior to demethylation, a competing nucleosome-binding peptide from the high-mobility group protein effectively inhibited LSD1 activity. Thus, our studies provide the first glimpse of nucleosome demethylation by LSD1 in the absence of other scaffolding proteins.