Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(1): 87-92, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32450710

ABSTRACT

Background: Cancer is annually responsible for millions of deaths in Europe and billions of euros in productivity losses; the estimated mortality rate of lymphoma was of 7.07 per 100,000 individuals in Spain in 2018. This study aimed to evaluate the burden that lymphoma mortality represents for the Spanish society. Methods: The human capital approach was used to estimate the costs derived from premature mortality due to lymphoma between 2008 and 2017. Results: The number of deaths attributable to lymphoma increased steadily over the study period; the major number of deaths occurred among males aged 80 to 84 years. During the study period, 97,069 years of productive life were lost, a parameter that decreased noticeably over time due to the reduction in the number of deaths at working age. Productivity losses decreased accordingly. Lymphoma represented the 45.36% of losses due to hematological malignancies, generating €121 million in losses the year 2017. Hodgkin lymphoma was, among hematological malignancies, the malignancy accounting for the highest portion of losses per individual. Conclusions: Lymphoma represents a significant burden that can be reduced with the implementation of improved diagnosis and treatment methods, which must be taken into account in resource allocation and management policies.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Hodgkin Disease/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Efficiency , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/economics , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/economics , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality, Premature/trends , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Lancet Haematol ; 7(2): e146-e156, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31948928

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several strategies are available for the initial treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, but the optimal strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the quality-adjusted effectiveness and costs of five modern treatment options for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: A Markov decision-analytic model was developed using a 20-year time horizon. Five of the most common treatment approaches were selected based on clinical experience and expert opinion: (1) six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), including data from the HD2000 trial, Viviani and colleagues, and EORTC trial; (2) six cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP; from the HD15 trial or PET-adapted as in the HD18 trial, two initial cycles of BEACOPP followed by four additional cycles for patients with a positive PET and either two or four additional cycles of BEACOPP for patients with a negative PET); (3) PET-adapted escalation (as in the RATHL trial, two cycles of standard ABVD chemotherapy followed by an additional four cycles of ABVD or AVD in PET-negative patients and four cycles of BEACOPP in PET-positive patients); (4) six cycles of brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (A-AVD) or ABVD as in the Echelon-1 trial; and (5) PET-adapted de-escalation (as in the AHL2011 trial, two cycles of BEACOPP followed by PET2 scan; PET-positive patients received two additional BEACOPP cycles and PET-negative patients received two cycles of ABVD; at PET4, PET-negative patients completed two further cycles of either ABVD or BEACOPP depending on what they received after PET2, and PET-positive patients received salvage therapy). Note that all uses of BEACOPP in these strategies were BEACOPPescalated. The randomised groups of interest from these studies comprised 4255 patients enrolled between April, 2000, and January, 2016. Baseline probability estimates and utilities were derived from the included trials in addition to a systematic review of published studies. A Canadian public health payer's perspective was considered (CAN$1=US$0·74) and adjusted for inflation for 2018. All costs and benefits were discounted by 1·5% per year because life-years now are more valuable than future potential life-years. FINDINGS: Probabilistic analyses (10 000 simulations) showed that, for a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAN$50 000, a PET-adapted de-escalation strategy based on AHL2011 was more cost-effective 87% of the time. This strategy had the highest number of life-years (14·6 years [95% CI 13·7-15·1]) and quality-adjusted life years (13·2 years [95% CI 10·2-14·4]), and the lowest direct costs ($53 129 [95% CI 31 914-94 446]) compared with the other treatment regimens. Sensitivity analyses showed that the model was robust to key variables, including probability of treatment-related mortality, relapse, frequency of secondary malignancy, death from secondary malignancy, and probability of infertility after BEACOPP. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that, when considering cost, effectiveness, and short and long-term toxicities, the preferred treatment strategy for patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma is the PET-adapted de-escalation regimen starting with BEACOPP and de-escalating to ABVD as appropriate. Although our findings do not provide an absolute best treatment approach for clinicians to follow for all patients, they can contribute to shared decision making between patients and treating physicians. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Hodgkin Disease , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Bleomycin/economics , Canada , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/economics , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Dacarbazine/economics , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/economics , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Etoposide/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/economics , Procarbazine/administration & dosage , Procarbazine/economics , Vinblastine/administration & dosage , Vinblastine/economics , Vincristine/administration & dosage , Vincristine/economics
3.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program ; 2019(1): 252-259, 2019 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31808838

ABSTRACT

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) stands out as success story in the field of medical oncology, with multiagent chemotherapy with or without radiation leading to durable remission for most patients. Large-scale clinical trials during the past 40 years have sought to minimize toxicities while maintaining strong efficacy, including efforts to reduce the size of radiation fields, minimize alkylator chemotherapy, reduce the number of chemotherapy cycles, and omit radiation in select populations. The last decade has also ushered in novel therapies, including brentuximab vedotin (BV), that have improved clinical outcomes for patients with cHL resistant to standard cytotoxic therapies. More recently, a large randomized trial compared BV plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced stage cHL. With ∼24 months of available follow-up, the BV containing regimen was found to be associated with a reduction in the risk of progression, death, or incomplete response to first-line treatment (modified progression-free survival). Whether this early signal of improved efficacy is worth the additional acute toxicities and added drug-related expenses associated with incorporating BV into first-line treatment remains controversial. This chapter provides historical background; reviews the cost-effectiveness of available cHL therapies; and summarizes potential ways to balance innovation, affordability, and patient access to novel therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans
4.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 12(10): 801-808, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432732

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma are excellent, and the intent of frontline therapy for even advanced-stage disease has been curative. This review summarizes the role of brentuximab vedotin in the upfront treatment of advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the context of reducing therapy-related toxicity without compromising the high cure rate. Areas covered: Strategies to reduce bleomycin-induced lung toxicity include a response-adapted approach investigated in the RATHL study and a replacement of bleomycin with brentuximab vedotin in frontline chemotherapy regimens. In both studies, omission of bleomycin in the non-standard arms decreased the rate of pulmonary toxicity while maintaining high progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Expert opinion: The approval of A+AVD in North America offers a new bleomycin-free regimen for the treatment of advanced-stage HL, but it must be balanced against a risk-adapted approach. Recently presented subset analyses raise a question about which patients benefit most from this therapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Brentuximab Vedotin/therapeutic use , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Immunotoxins/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bleomycin/adverse effects , Bleomycin/economics , Brentuximab Vedotin/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dacarbazine/economics , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/economics , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Female , Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Immunotoxins/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Survival Analysis , Vinblastine/economics , Vinblastine/therapeutic use
5.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(13): 3116-3131, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31167589

ABSTRACT

Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly curable disease with a peak incidence in young adulthood at times where education, family, and social relations are established. We performed a systematic literature review to assess the impact of Hodgkin lymphoma on the socioeconomic status of adolescent and adult survivors (including educational achievements, occupational aspects, marriage, and parenthood). In total, 39 articles were included. Overall, 26-36% of survivors perceived Hodgkin lymphoma as negatively affecting their socioeconomic status. Studies consistently found educational achievements in line with general population. Employment rates for survivors were comparable to the general population, but lower than before Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis, with a post-diagnosis increase in disability pension and early retirement. Employed survivors encountered problems related to physical restrictions and recruitment. Marriage and parenthood were not substantially affected. In conclusion, current studies suggest acceptable socioeconomic outcomes following a Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis but the use of standardized reporting methods hampers comparability across studies.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Quality of Life/psychology , Social Class , Adolescent , Adult , Cancer Survivors , Educational Status , Employment/economics , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/psychology , Humans , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Parents , Young Adult
6.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 37(10): 1195-1207, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895564

ABSTRACT

As part of its Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (Merck Sharp & Dohme; MSD) of pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) to submit evidence of its clinical and cost effectiveness for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (RRcHL) who did not respond to treatment with brentuximab vedotin. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre+, was commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG). The ERG produced a detailed review of the evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of the technology, based on the company's submission to NICE. According to the NICE scope, pembrolizumab was compared with single or combination chemotherapy. Comparisons were undertaken in two populations: patients who did and did not receive prior autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT; populations 1 and 2, respectively). Despite it having been recommended by NICE in population 1 at the time the ERG received the company submission, nivolumab was not included as a comparator. No studies directly comparing pembrolizumab and its comparators were identified. One ongoing, single-arm study of the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-087) and one comparative observational study (Cheah et al., 2016) were used to inform the comparative effectiveness of pembrolizumab and standard of care (SoC), using indirect comparisons in both populations. Almost all analyses showed significant PFS and overall response rate benefits for pembrolizumab versus SoC, but due to being based on indirect comparison, were likely to contain systematic error. The economic evaluation therefore suffered from substantial uncertainty in any estimates of cost effectiveness. Furthermore, there was a lack of evidence on the uptake and timing of allogeneic stem cell transplant, and alternative assumptions had a significant impact on cost effectiveness. Immature survival data from KEYNOTE-087 exacerbated this issue and necessitated the use of alternative data sources for longer-term extrapolation of survival. Some issues identified in the company's analyses were amended by the ERG. The revised ERG deterministic base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on the company's second Appraisal Consultation Document response for pembrolizumab versus SoC (with a commercial access agreement) for populations 1 and 2 were £54,325 and £62,527 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. There was substantial uncertainty around these ICERs, especially in population 2. NICE did not recommend pembrolizumab as an option for treating RRcHL in population 1, but recommended pembrolizumab for use within the Cancer Drugs Fund in population 2.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Technology Assessment, Biomedical
7.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(6): 1389-1398, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30507313

ABSTRACT

We performed a survey in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to learn more about their perspectives on treatment risks and benefits. We sent questions to 1149 survivors from the GHSG's HD13-15 trials with (N = 249) or without (N =900) documented progression or relapse. The participation rate was 52% (N =581). After median follow-up of 106 months, 40% of relapse-free and over 60% of relapsed survivors were still worried about late effects and the possibility of relapse. Chemotherapy, largely independent of its intensity, had been a strain on 74% of relapse-free and 90% of relapsed survivors. Most physical, psychological, and socio-economic sequelae were more frequent among relapsed survivors (p < .05) and described as very burdensome. 74% of relapse-free and 61% of relapsed survivors considered primary cure from Hodgkin lymphoma as the most important aspect in the choice of treatment. Accordingly, primary optimal lymphoma control is of utmost importance from the patients' perspective.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aftercare , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
8.
J Glob Oncol ; 4: 1-7, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30433841

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Improvements in childhood survival rates have been achieved in low- and middle- income countries that have made a commitment to improve access to cancer care. Accurate data on the costs of delivering cancer treatment in these settings will allow ministries of health and donors to accurately assess and plan for expansions of access to care. This study assessed the financial cost of treating two common pediatric cancers, nephroblastoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, at the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence in rural Rwanda. METHODS: A microcosting approach was used to calculate the per-patient cost for Hodgkin lymphoma and nephroblastoma diagnosis and treatment. Costs were analyzed retrospectively from the provider perspective for the 2014 fiscal year. The cost per patient was determined using an idealized patient receiving a full course of treatment, follow-up, and recommended social support in accordance with the national treatment protocol for each cancer. RESULTS: The cost for a full course of treatment, follow-up, and social support was determined to be between $1,490 and $2,093 for a patient with nephroblastoma and between $1,140 and $1,793 for a pediatric patient with Hodgkin lymphoma. CONCLUSION: Task shifting, reduced labor costs, and locally adapted protocols contributed to significantly lower costs than those seen in middle- or high-income countries.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/economics , Wilms Tumor/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Male , Rwanda , Survival Rate , Wilms Tumor/mortality
10.
Int J Cancer ; 142(5): 883-890, 2018 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023692

ABSTRACT

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-known determinant of outcomes in cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of the SES on the outcomes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients from the Brazilian Prospective HL Registry. SES stratification was done using an individual asset/education-based household index. A total of 624 classical HL patients with diagnosis from January/2009 to December/2014, and treated with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine), were analyzed. The median follow-up was 35.6 months, and 33% were classified as lower SES. The 3-year progression- free survival (PFS) in higher and lower SES were 78 and 64% (p < 0.0001), respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in higher and lower SES were 94 and 82% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Lower SES patients were more likely to be ≥ 60 years (16 vs. 8%, p = 0.003), and to present higher risk International Prognostic score (IPS) (44 vs. 31%, p = 0.004) and advanced disease (71 vs. 58%, p = 0.003). After adjustments for potential confounders, lower SES remained independently associated with poorer survival (HR = 3.12 [1.86-5.22] for OS and HR = 1.66 [1.19-2.32] for PFS). The fatality ratio during treatment was 7.5 and 1.3% for lower and higher SES (p = 0.0001). Infections and treatment toxicity accounted for 81% of these deaths. SES is an independent factor associated with shorter survival in HL in Brazil. Potential underlying mechanisms associated with the impact of SES are delayed diagnosis and poorer education. Educational and socio-economic support interventions must be tested in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Brazil , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Humans , Income , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Young Adult
11.
PLoS One ; 12(10): e0180261, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28991893

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Although brentuximab vedotin (BV) has changed the management of patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL), little information is available on routine clinical practice. We identified treatment patterns and costs of care among RRHL patients in the United States (US) treated with BV. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of adults initiating BV for RRHL from 2011-2015, with ≥6 months of data prior to and following BV initiation, was conducted. Treatments were classified based on dispensations and chemotherapy administration. Median total and monthly costs were estimated based on all-cause healthcare resource use in 2015 US dollars (USD). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 289 patients (59% male; mean age at diagnosis, 42 years) with a mean follow-up of 250 weeks. Eleven percent had BV salvage therapy prior to ASCT, and 32% had BV for a relapse post-ASCT. 43% received treatment post-BV, most commonly allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) and bendamustine (both 10.2%). Median (IQR) total costs from BV initiation to censoring were 294,790 (142,110-483,360) USD; and were highest among those treated with BV prior to ASCT (up to 421,900 [300,940-778,970] USD). Median monthly costs were almost 20,000 USD per month, and up to 25,000 USD per month among those with BV and ASCT. Medications were the greatest driver of median monthly costs. CONCLUSIONS: Median total all-cause costs were almost 300,000 USD, and median monthly costs approximately 20,000 USD, per patient treated. Patients requiring treatment following BV continue to incur high costs, highlighting the economic burden associated with managing patients in the RRHL setting.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/drug therapy , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Immunoconjugates/economics , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Adult , Brentuximab Vedotin , Female , Health Care Costs , Hodgkin Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
13.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep ; 11(4): 271-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27177742

ABSTRACT

Secondary analysis of large datasets has become a useful alternative to address research questions outside the reach of clinical trials. It is increasingly utilized in hematology and oncology. In this review, we provided an overview of some examples of commonly used large datasets in the USA and described common research themes that can be pursued using such a methodology. We selected a sample of 14 articles on adult hematologic malignancies published in 2015 and highlighted their contributions as well as limitations.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/economics , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hodgkin Disease/diagnosis , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/economics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/economics , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/economics , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Multiple Myeloma/therapy
14.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 25(2): 264-73, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826029

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies documented racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival after Hodgkin lymphoma among adolescents and young adults (AYA), but did not consider the influence of combined-modality treatment and health insurance. METHODS: Data for 9,353 AYA patients ages 15 to 39 years when diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma during 1988 to 2011 were obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, we examined the impact of sociodemographic characteristics [race/ethnicity, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), and health insurance], initial combined-modality treatment, and subsequent cancers on survival. RESULTS: Over the 24-year study period, we observed improvements in Hodgkin lymphoma-specific survival by diagnostic period and differences in survival by race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES, and health insurance for a subset of more recently diagnosed patients (2001-2011). In multivariable analyses, Hodgkin lymphoma-specific survival was worse for Blacks than Whites with early-stage [HR: 1.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-2.49] and late-stage disease (HR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.41) and for Hispanics than Whites with late-stage disease (HR: 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04). AYAs diagnosed with early-stage disease experienced worse survival if they also resided in lower SES neighborhoods (HR: 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.68). Furthermore, more recently diagnosed AYAs with public health insurance or who were uninsured experienced worse Hodgkin lymphoma-specific survival (HR: 2.08; 95% CI, 1.52-2.84). CONCLUSION: Our findings identify several subgroups of Hodgkin lymphoma patients at higher risk for Hodgkin lymphoma mortality. IMPACT: Identifying and reducing barriers to recommended treatment and surveillance in these AYAs at much higher risk of mortality is essential to ameliorating these survival disparities.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Health Status Disparities , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Registries , Social Class , Survival Rate , Young Adult
15.
Cancer ; 121(19): 3515-24, 2015 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26058564

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between insurance status and outcomes has not been well established for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The purpose of this study was to examine the disparities in overall survival (OS) by insurance status in a large cohort of patients with HL. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to evaluate patients with stage I to IV HL from 1998 to 2011. The association between insurance status, covariables, and outcomes was assessed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among the 76,681 patients within the NCDB, 45,777 patients with stage I to IV HL were eligible for this study (median follow-up, 6.0 years). The median age was 39 years (range, 18-90 years). The insurance status was as follows: 3247 (7.1%) were uninsured, 7962 (17.4%) had Medicaid, 30,334 (66.3%) had private insurance, 3746 (8.2%) had managed care, and 488 (1.1%) had Medicare. Patients with an unfavorable insurance status (Medicaid/uninsured) were at a more advanced stage, had higher comorbidity scores, had B symptoms, and were in a lower income/education quartile (all P < .01). These patients were less likely to receive radiotherapy and start chemotherapy promptly and were less commonly treated at academic/research centers (all P < .01). Patients with unfavorable insurance had a 5-year OS of 54% versus 87% for those favorably insured (P < .01). When adjustments were made for covariates, an unfavorable insurance status was associated with significantly decreased OS (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.91; P < .01). The unfavorable insurance status rate increased from 22.8% to 28.8% between 1998 and 2011. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that HL patients with Medicaid and uninsured patients have outcomes inferior to those of patients with more favorable insurance. Targeting this subset of patients with limited access to care may help to improve outcomes. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities/economics , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Insurance Coverage/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Acta Oncol ; 54(5): 743-9, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25752974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological malignancies have a poorer labour market prognosis than the general population. We have previously found that they have low rates of return to work, and a higher risk of being granted disability pension, than individuals without a history of these diseases. The aim of this study was to further investigate the labour market prognosis for these patients, by comparing the risk of being granted wage-subsidised (WS) employment as a result of permanently reduced work capacity among patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies to a reference cohort, and to determine if relative risks differ between subtypes of haematological malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We combined data from national registers on Danish patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies between 2000 and 2007 and a reference cohort without a history of these diseases. A total of 3194 patients and 28 627 reference individuals were followed until they were granted WS employment, disability pension, anticipatory pension, old age pension, emigration, death or until 26 February 2012, whichever came first. RESULTS: A total of 310 (10%) patients and 795 (3%) reference individuals had their work capacity permanently reduced to an extent that they were granted WS employment during the follow-up period. Age- and gender-adjusted relative risks differed significantly between the subgroups of haematological malignancies, and four years after diagnosis they ranged from 2.47 (95% CI 1.46-4.16) for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma to 10.83 (95% CI 7.15-16.40) for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. CONCLUSION: All eight subtypes of haematological malignancies were associated with an increased risk of being granted WS employment due to permanently reduced work capacity compared to the reference cohort. The relative risks differed according to haematological malignancy subtype, and the highest was found for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.


Subject(s)
Employment, Supported/statistics & numerical data , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Pensions/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/classification , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hodgkin Disease/complications , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Insurance, Disability , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/economics , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/economics , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Retirement/statistics & numerical data , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Risk , Sex Factors , Survivors , Work Capacity Evaluation , Young Adult
18.
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota) ; 16(2): 260-9, 2014.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25383499

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. METHODS: A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). CONCLUSION: If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease/economics , Multimodal Imaging/economics , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Adolescent , Child , Colombia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Fluorine Radioisotopes/economics , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/economics , Hodgkin Disease/diagnostic imaging , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Humans , Life Expectancy , Male , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/economics , Prognosis , Radiopharmaceuticals/economics
19.
Cancer ; 120(14): 2122-9, 2014 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who achieved complete remission with frontline therapy and then underwent either clinical surveillance or routine surveillance imaging. METHODS: In total, 241 patients who were newly diagnosed with cHL between January 2000 and December 2010 at 3 participating tertiary care centers and achieved complete remission after first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, there were 174 patients in the routine surveillance imaging group and 67 patients in the clinical surveillance group, based on the intended mode of surveillance. In the routine surveillance imaging group, the intended plan of surveillance included computed tomography and/or positron emission tomography scans; whereas, in the clinical surveillance group, the intended plan of surveillance was clinical examination and laboratory studies, and scans were obtained only to evaluate concerning signs or symptoms. Baseline patient characteristics, prognostic features, treatment records, and outcomes were collected. The primary objective was to compare overall survival for patients in both groups. For secondary objectives, we compared the success of second-line therapy and estimated the costs of imaging for each group. RESULTS: After 5 years of follow-up, the overall survival rate was 97% (95% confidence interval, 92%-99%) in the routine surveillance imaging group and 96% (95% confidence interval, 87%-99%) in the clinical surveillance group (P = .41). There were few relapses in each group, and all patients who relapsed in both groups achieved complete remission with second-line therapy. The charges associated with routine surveillance imaging were significantly higher than those for the clinical surveillance strategy, with no apparent clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical surveillance was not inferior to routine surveillance imaging in patients with cHL who achieved complete remission with frontline therapy. Routine surveillance imaging was associated with significantly increased estimated imaging charges.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Induction Chemotherapy , Population Surveillance , Positron-Emission Tomography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Cause of Death , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Direct Service Costs , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hodgkin Disease/diagnostic imaging , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Positron-Emission Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Recurrence , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , United States , Vinblastine/administration & dosage
20.
Rev. salud pública ; 16(2): 250-258, mar.-abr. 2014. ilus, mapas
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-725008

ABSTRACT

Objetivo Estimar la costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes menores de 18 años con Linfoma Hodgkin (LH). Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión donde se comparó el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la detección de lesión residual. El resultado se midió en Años de Vida Ganados (AVG). Se calculó la razón de costo-efectividad incremental. Se utilizó como umbral 3 veces el PIB per cápita por año AVG. Valores expresados en pesos colombianos de 2010 (1 US dólar = $ 1 897,89) Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad univariados, bivariados y probabilísticos. Resultados Suponiendo un diferencial en AVG entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos de 13 meses, el costo de un AVG adicional con 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con LH fue $ 34 508 590. Conclusión Si el diferencial de esperanza de vida entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos es de al menos un 1,03 años, el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT en la evaluación al final del tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con LH, es una estrategia costo-efectiva para Colombia.


Objective Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. Methods A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). Conclusion If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Hodgkin Disease/economics , Multimodal Imaging/economics , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Colombia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Fluorine Radioisotopes/economics , /economics , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Hodgkin Disease , Hodgkin Disease , Life Expectancy , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Neoplasm, Residual/economics , Prognosis , Radiopharmaceuticals/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...