Physiologic Treatment of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum.

We aimed to evaluate physiologic treatment of severe hypertension. This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant and postpartum patients with severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure [BP] 160 mm Hg or higher or diastolic BP 110 mm Hg or higher) treated with intravenous labetalol or hydralazine at a single tertiary care center between 2013 and 2018. Patients were classified as having physiologic treatment if they had hyperdynamic physiology (pulse pressure 65 mm Hg or higher) and received labetalol or had vasoconstrictive physiology (diastolic BP 100 mm Hg or higher) and received hydralazine. The primary outcome was number of antihypertensive doses to achieve nonsevere BP. Of 1,120 patients included in the analysis, 653 had physiologic treatment and 467 had nonphysiologic treatment, with 16 (1.4%) excluded for inability to classify physiology. Physiologic treatment was associated with fewer antihypertensive doses (1.4±0.9 doses vs 1.6±1.4 doses; adjusted ß -0.28, 95% CI, -0.42 to -0.14) and lower odds of medication conversion (2.5% vs 4.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI, 0.24-0.93) but no difference in time to nonsevere BP (31 minutes [interquartile range 16-66 minutes] vs 34 minutes [interquartile range 15-76 minutes]; adjusted hazard ratio 1.0, 95% CI, 0.9-1.2). Physiologic treatment of severe hypertension warrants further evaluation.

Comparison of efficacy of intravenous labetalol and intravenous hydralazine for management of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intravenous Labetalol and intravenous Hydralazine in reduction of blood pressure in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Methodology: This comparative study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi from1st June 2019 to 30th June 2020. Total 208 pregnant women having severe pre-eclampsia (systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and diastolic pressure ≥110mmHg) were included in study. Group A received I/V Labetalol. Group B received I/V Hydralazine. Efficacy of drugs was observed by reduction in blood pressure and the number of doses administered. Data was analysed using SPSS version 26. Results: Systolic blood pressure reduction in Labetalol group was significantly lower than in hydralazine group (105.5 ±11.3 vs. 115.8 ±17.1, p≤ 0.001). Diastolic blood pressure reduction was also lower in labetalol group than in hydralazine group (p= 0.03). Number of dosage of drugs in Group A (Labetalol) was 3.2 ±1.2 vs. Group B (Hydralazine) was 4.4±1.4, p =0.006). Conclusion: The results of this study show that Labetalol is more effective as compared to Hydralazine in terms of reducing the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and number of doses (Drugs) for in patients with severe preeclampsia.

Diagnostic dilemma: drug-induced vasculitis versus systemic vasculitis.

Drug-induced vasculitis can rarely cause inflammation and necrosis of blood vessel walls of both kidney and lung tissue. Diagnosis is challenging because of the lack of difference between systemic and drug-induced vasculitis in clinical presentation, immunological workup and pathological findings. Tissue biopsy guides diagnosis and treatment. Pathological findings must be correlated with clinical information to arrive at a presumed diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis. We present a patient with hydralazine-induced antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-positive vasculitis with a pulmonary-renal syndrome manifesting as pauci-immune glomerulonephritis and alveolar haemorrhage.

Overlapping drug-induced vasculitis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and lupus nephritis caused by low-dose hydralazine.

INTRODUCTION: We present a case of drug-induced vasculitis secondary to low-dose hydralazine with overlapping features of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and drug-induced lupus nephritis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old Hispanic woman with a medical history of resistant hypertension treated with hydralazine 10 mg twice daily for 1 year presented with generalized weakness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and gross hematuria. There was fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, lactic acidosis, hyperkalemia, renal failure, and anemia. Chest computed tomography and bronchoscopy revealed a left lower lobe infiltrate and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Serologic testing was positive for anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-Smith, lupus anticoagulant, anti-histone, anti-cardiolipin IgM antibodies, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (myeloperoxidase and proteinase 3). A kidney biopsy revealed crescentic glomerulonephritis with an overlapping finding of membranous nephropathy. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, and plasmapheresis were initiated. The patient survived but required continuous hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although a few cases of simultaneous antibody-associated vasculitis and drug-induced lupus nephritis secondary to hydralazine use have been reported, this case is singular. Similar findings were previously reported with doses of 50-100 mg two to three times daily over 1-5 years. In our patient, a dose of only 10 mg twice daily for a year caused a severe disease presentation. This brings to light the combination of different vasculitides that can coexist and the potentially life-threatening adverse effects of low-dose hydralazine that should be kept in mind.

Reduction of Intravenous Antihypertensives through Clinical Decision Support in a Large Safety Net System.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic severe hypertension (also known as hypertensive urgency) is frequently encountered in the hospital. Previous evidence suggests that management with one-time doses of intravenous (IV) antihypertensives may increase adverse events. Despite this, single-dose treatment remains common in the emergency department and inpatient settings. METHODS: This quality initiative was launched at New York City Health + Hospitals, the largest safety net hospital system in the United States. The initiative involved two changes to electronic orders for IV hydralazine and IV labetalol: a nonintrusive advisory statement within the order instructions and a mandatory requirement to document the indication for IV antihypertensive use. RESULTS: This initiative took place from November 2021 to October 2022. Of the indications selected for IV antihypertensive orders, 60.7% were for hypertensive emergency, 15.3% were for patients who were strictly NPO, 21.2% were for other, and 2.8% selected more than one indication. For ED-only encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient encounters were 2.53 preintervention and 1.55 postintervention (38.7% reduction, p < 0.001). For inpatient encounters, aggregate IV hydralazine and IV labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days were 18.25 preintervention and 15.81 postintervention (13.4% reduction, p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for individual orders of IV hydralazine and IV labetalol. There were significant reductions in 7 of the 11 hospitals in inpatient administration of aggregate IV hydralazine and labetalol orders per 1,000 patient-days. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement initiative successfully reduced unnecessary IV antihypertensive use in an 11-hospital safety net system.

The Effects of Verapamil, Hydralazine, and Doxazosin on Renin, Aldosterone, and the Ratio Thereof.

PURPOSE: Hydralazine, doxazosin, and verapamil are currently recommended by the Endocrine Society as acceptable bridging treatment in those in whom full cessation of antihypertensive medication is infeasible during screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). This is under the assumption that they cause minimal to no effect on the aldosterone-to-renin ratio, the most widely used screening test for PA. However, limited evidence is available regarding the effects of these particular drugs on said ratio. METHODS: In the present study, we retrospectively assessed the changes in aldosterone, renin, and aldosterone-to-renin values in essential hypertensive participants before and after treatment with either hydralazine (n = 26) or doxazosin (n = 20) or verapamil (n = 15). All samples were taken under highly standardized conditions. RESULTS: Hydralazine resulted in a borderline significant rise in active plasma renin concentration (19 vs 25 mIU/L, p = 0.067) and a significant fall in the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (38 vs 24, p = 0.017). Doxazosin caused declines in both plasma aldosterone concentration (470 vs 330 pmol/L, p = 0.028) and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (30 vs 20, p = 0.020). With respect to verapamil, we found no statistically significant effect on any of these outcome variables. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the assumption that these drugs can be used with little consequence to the aldosterone-to-renin cannot be substantiated. While it is possible that they are indeed the best option when full antihypertensive drug cessation is infeasible, the potential effects of these drugs must still be taken into account when interpreting the aldosterone-to-renin ratio.

Hydralazine-Induced Fulminant Liver Failure Requiring Urgent Liver Transplant: Common Drug With Rare Complication.

Drug-induced liver injury resulting in fulminant liver failure is a well-known condition, and many drugs have been documented in the literature as possible etiologies. However, hydralazine has seldom been reported as the offending agent. Our case report is about one such rare scenario of fulminant liver failure due to hydralazine use as an antihypertensive. A 65-year-old female patient presented with signs of fulminant liver failure 2 months after starting hydralazine for hypertension. She underwent extensive workup for the cause of acute liver failure. Other possible medications were ruled out, and workup for autoimmune and other etiologies were also negative. The patient underwent a deceased donor liver transplant and has been doing well since then. Her liver was found to be atrophic, with microscopically confirmed drug-induced liver injury. Hydralazine is used orally to treat essential hypertension and intravenously to emergently lower blood pressure. Hydralazineinduced acute liver failure is extremely rare. However, in this rare case where hydralazine-related drug-induced liver injury worsened to the extent of requiring liver transplant, we felt obliged to document and highlight this complication as a form of reminder to our colleagues of this serious outcome.

Comparison of intravenous labetalol and hydralazine for severe hypertension in pregnancy in Northeastern Nigeria: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous hydralazine and labetalol for acutely lowering severe hypertension in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a superiority parallel double-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted from October 2018 to June 2019 in two hospitals in Gombe, Nigeria. Pregnant women with a live singleton fetus at gestational age of at least 28 weeks with severe hypertension were randomized (60 per group) to receive incremental doses of either intravenous labetalol (20 mg; 40 mg; 80 mg; 80 mg; and 80 mg) or 10 mg of intravenous hydralazine - up to a maximum of 5 doses - until the target blood pressure was achieved or the study was terminated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the mean reduction in mean arterial blood pressure and occurrence of persistent hypertension. Other endpoints were maternal side-effects, perinatal death, Apgar score at birth and SCBU admission. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients' data were analyzed (fifty-six [56] in the hydralazine group and fifty-seven [57] in the labetalol group). There were no significant differences in the fall of the mean arterial blood pressure (labetalol; 24.19 mmHg/hydralazine; 27.68 mmHg) (p = 0.192), maternal side effects, perinatal deaths, Apgar scores and SCBU admission between the two groups. Hydralazine, however, produced a more marked reduction in diastolic blood pressure than labetalol (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Both labetalol and hydralazine are effective for acute blood pressure control in pregnancy with a similar safety profile. This study was self-funded and registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (www.pactr.orgPACTR202010738538062).

First-trimester miscarriage rate decreases with hydralazine therapy in pregnancies with early uterine vascular insufficiency: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Miscarriage is the most frequent cause of pregnancy loss, affecting 15-20% of clinically recognized pregnancies. Early uterine vascular insufficiency (EUVI), defined as abnormal uterine artery (UA) Doppler impedance indices in early pregnancy, is present in two-thirds of pregnancies ending in miscarriage after embryonic cardiac activity has been detected. There is currently no available therapy for reducing the risk of miscarriage in these cases. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether vasodilator therapy with hydralazine can reduce abnormally high UA impedance indices and miscarriage rates in pregnancies with EUVI when administered from before 9 weeks' gestation until completing 13 weeks' gestation. METHODS: A total of 253 consecutive singleton pregnancies with a live embryo and scanned before 9 weeks' gestation were included in the study. Ninety-two pregnancies (36.3%) were classified as having EUVI. Hydralazine was administered in daily doses of 50 mg, starting 24-36 h after the initial diagnosis of EUVI and continuing throughout the first trimester. The miscarriage rate in the hydralazine-treated EUVI group was compared with the one observed in our previously reported untreated cohort and the pregnancies with EUVI that declined treatment with hydralazine. RESULTS: The miscarriage rate among the hydralazine-treated EUVI group was significantly lower than the previously reported untreated cohort (7.8% versus 26.2%, p = .003; odds ratio (OR) = 4.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-11.9). In 15 untreated pregnancies with EUVI, the miscarriage rate was similar to that of the previously reported untreated cohort (26.7% versus 26.2%; p = .603) and higher than the hydralazine-treated group (26.7% versus 7.8%, p = .05; OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.1-18.2). CONCLUSIONS: Hydralazine therapy in pregnancies with EUVI was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of miscarriage. We suggest a sequence of events leading to a higher risk of miscarriage in pregnancies with EUVI and propose a potential mechanism through which hydralazine may reduce this risk.

Hydralazine-induced liver injury: a review and discussion.

Hydralazine is a commonly prescribed antihypertensive agent. Some of its labelled adverse reactions include lupus-like syndrome, tachycardia, headache and fever. Despite its well-known side effects, little is known about hydralazine's hepatotoxic effects. We report the case of a 54-year-old female patient who was started on hydralazine for hypertension management but later presented with hydralazine-induced liver injury. Her initial presentation consisted of non-specific symptoms and a hepatocellular injury pattern. Liver biopsy revealed hepatic steatosis. Three weeks after discontinuation of hydralazine, the patient's liver enzymes normalised, and her symptoms resolved. Few studies have examined the incidence and mechanism by which hydralazine induces a liver injury pattern. With this case, we review the literature, the pathogenesis involved and the eventual management of hydralazine-induced liver injury. We propose close monitoring of liver enzymes for patients on hydralazine throughout their treatment course.

Severe cutaneous presentation of hydralazine-induced ANCA vasculitis without renal or pulmonary involvement, complicated by DIC.

Hydralazine is a common arterial vasodilator used in the management of congestive heart failure and hypertension. It can be associated with drug-induced lupus and less commonly antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV). Drug-induced AAV typically has a favourable long-term prognosis. It is not commonly associated with primary skin involvement, as most cases also have notable kidney and lung disease. Cases with isolated skin findings are rare. We present a rare case of a 60-year-old woman on long-term hydralazine who presented with AAV with primary skin and mucosal involvement, in the form of diffuse bullous and ulcerative lesions, which posed a diagnostic challenge. Her hospital course was marked by several complications including disseminated intravascular coagulation. She required intensive therapy with high-dose steroids, plasmapheresis and rituximab. She tolerated immunosuppression well and with multidisciplinary supportive care, she recovered well and was able to be discharged from the hospital.

Hydralazine-Induced Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Asymptomatic and Renal-Restricted Presentation.

BACKGROUND Hydralazine, a potent vasodilator widely used to treat hypertension, has been implicated in an increasing number of cases of drug-induced autoimmune diseases in recent years. However, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis secondary to hydralazine use has rarely been described and most reported cases involved multi-organ-related vasculitis, including skin and lung-kidney manifestations. ANCA-associated vasculitis is an immune-inflammatory condition characterized by necrotizing vasculitis with few or no immune deposits, predominantly affecting small vessels. The fact that the vasculitis is associated with hydralazine use and improves with discontinuation of hydralazine supports the diagnosis of hydralazine-induced disease. The case we report is a hydralazine-induced, ANCA-associated, pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis with a presentation limited to the kidneys. CASE REPORT A 66-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for worsening renal function over a month with no symptoms. Serology work-up was significantly positive for antinuclear, perinuclear ANCA, anti-histone, anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-myeloperoxidase antibodies. The patient ultimately underwent a kidney biopsy, which revealed pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis. Her kidney function improved with cessation of hydralazine as well as therapy with pulse steroids. CONCLUSIONS Hydralazine is commonly prescribed to treat hypertension. Healthcare providers should be aware of potentially severe hydralazine-induced ANCA-associated vasculitis, which can present with various clinical manifestations. Serologic studies have indicated that it has features that overlap with lupus. Biopsy is helpful for making a definitive diagnosis and developing individual treatment plans. Early diagnosis, cessation of the offending drug, and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are key for favorable prognosis.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated glomerulonephritis complicating treatment with hydralazine.

Hydralazine, a widely used therapy for hypertension and heart failure, can elicit autoimmune disease, including anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN). We identified 80 cases of ANCA-GN complicating treatment with hydralazine, accounting for 4.3% (80/1858 biopsies) of ANCA-GN diagnosed between 2006 and 2019. Over three-fourths of patients were on hydralazine for at least one year, with mean daily dose of approximately 250 mg/day. ANCA testing revealed p-ANCA/myeloperoxidase-ANCA seropositivity in 98%, including 39% with dual p-ANCA/myeloperoxidase-ANCA and cANCA/anti-protinase 3-ANCA positivity, often accompanied by anti-nuclear antibody (89%), anti-histone antibody (98%), and hypocomplementemia (58%). Kidney biopsy revealed necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis, similar to primary ANCA-GN, but significantly less frequently pauci-immune (77 vs. 100%) and more commonly associated with mesangial hypercellularity (30 vs. 5%), electron dense deposits (62 vs. 20%), and endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions (11 vs. 0%); all significant differences. On follow-up, 42 of 51 patients received induction immunosuppression: 19 reached the combined end-points of kidney failure or death and 32 had mean creatinine of 1.49 mg/dL at last follow-up. Thus, hydralazine-associated ANCA-GN often exhibits overlapping clinical and pathologic features of mild immune complex glomerulonephritis resembling lupus nephritis. With discontinuation of hydralazine and immunosuppression, outcomes are similar to primary ANCA-GN.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous hydralazine and labetalol for the treatment of asymptomatic hypertension in hospitalised patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the management of asymptomatic hypertension (HTN) in the inpatient setting recommend the use of oral antihypertensives. However, in clinical practice, intravenous (IV) antihypertensives are commonly utilised with little supporting evidence. The objective of this study was to evaluate literature examining the safety/efficacy of IV hydralazine and labetalol in hospitalised patients with non-emergent, asymptomatic HTN. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were utilised to structure the systematic review. A search strategy composed of drug-, inpatient- and HTN-related terms was conducted utilising PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases through May 2020. Full-text, English-language articles describing IV labetalol and/or hydralazine use for non-emergent HTN in an inpatient setting that focused on clinical outcomes (ie vitals, adverse effects, healthcare utilisation) were included. Identified studies were screened/extracted using DistillerSR by two reviewers at each stage, and studies were evaluated qualitatively for the presence of bias. RESULTS: From 3362 records identified in the search, a final set of 10 articles were identified. Four studies focused on labetalol (40%), five studies on hydralazine and labetalol (50%), and one study on hydralazine (10%). The included studies presented a variety of outcomes, but several trends were identified, including reduction in average blood pressure in eight (80%) studies, a risk of adverse effects in six (60%) and increased length of stay in one (10%). DISCUSSION: The studies identified in this review raise concerns regarding the safety of IV hydralazine and labetalol in non-emergent HTN. Despite relatively broad clinical experience with these drugs, experimental investigations regarding their utility are recommended.

Hydralazine-Induced ANCA Associated Vasculitis (AAV) Presenting with Pulmonary-Renal Syndrome (PRS): A Case Report with Literature Review.

Hydralazine, an arterial vasodilator, is a widely used medication for the management of hypertension and heart failure, especially for patients who cannot tolerate the use of ACEIs or ARBs. It is generally well-tolerated and has a safe profile in pregnancy. However, hydralazine can induce immune-mediated side effects, such as hydralazine-induced lupus and less commonly hydralazine- induced ANCA vasculitis. The latter most commonly affects the kidneys with or without other organ involvement. There are several cases reported in the literature of hydralazine-induced ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV) that have pulmonary manifestations, also known as hydralazine- induced pulmonary-renal syndrome (PRS), a condition with a high risk of mortality. We are reporting a case of Hydralazine-induced ANCA associated glomerulonephritis with severe diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). In addition, we will review the current literature and discuss the importance of prompt diagnosis and early management to decrease mortality and morbidity associated with this serious condition.

Clinical Experiences of Intravenous Hydralazine and Labetalol for Acute Treatment of Severe Hypertension in Pregnant Thai Women.

Response to acute treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy in Asian women was not known. Labor and delivery checklists of Thai women treated with intravenous hydralazine or labetalol for systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 110 mm Hg from January 2011 to December 2013 were reviewed as parts of an audit. Primary outcome was prompt achievement of SBP 140-150 and DBP 90-100 mm Hg after the first bolus. Secondary outcomes were medication-related undesired effects. The mean ± standard deviation age and prevalence of chronic hypertension in hydralazine (n = 62) versus labetalol (n = 64) groups were 32.5 ± 6 versus 29.9 ± 6.8 years and 50% versus 21.9%, respectively (P < .05). Magnesium sulfate was promptly administered on admission to every woman to prevent seizure. Targeted blood pressure was timely achieved in 41.9% and 67.2% of the hydralazine and labetalol groups, respectively (P < .05). Nonreassuring fetal heart rate occurred in 51.6% and 32.8% of the hydralazine and labetalol groups, respectively (P = .05). The prevalence of cesarean section and Apgar score < 7 were not significantly different (P > .05). Real-life clinical experiences suggested significant advantages of intravenous labetalol over hydralazine in pregnant women with severe hypertension.