Risk and liabilities of prescribing compounded medications.

Complications resulting from the use of compounded medications have become a troubling trend nationwide. There is a significant potential for patients to suffer serious harm from the use of substandard medications prepared by compounding pharmacies, and the reality of this problem has been demonstrated in several well-publicized incidences of serious medical complications, including patient deaths, that directly resulted from the use of medications prepared at compounding pharmacies. Unlike US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs, compounded products are not required to meet evidentiary standards for establishing safety and efficacy. Moreover, these products are not held to Good Manufacturing Practices, which require regular inspections, quality control testing, and rejection of material not meeting specifications. Physicians, as well as other prescribers, need to be aware that when a patient suffers harm from using a compounded medication, those injured patients may bring negligence and malpractice claims, not only against the pharmacy and the pharmacist responsible for preparing the medication, but also against the prescribing physician and the physician's practice. Consequently, the best way for physicians to manage professional risk and avoid both litigation and potential negative patient outcomes related to compounded pharmaceuticals is to not use these products if there is an FDA-approved product available. However, if the use of a compounded medication is medically necessary, then physicians should adhere to the FDA guidance concerning traditional compounding. Moreover, it would be prudent for any physician who intends to either resell or participate in the distribution of compounded products beyond the direct treatment of their patients to consider obtaining the appropriate insurance coverage for this activity.

Stability of hydroxyprogesterone caproate alone and in a compounded pharmaceutical product.

PURPOSE: The chemical stability of hydroxyprogesterone caproate in powder form and in a pharmaceutical formulation under different experimental conditions was evaluated. METHODS: Pure hydroxyprogesterone caproate was subjected to hydrolysis, photolysis, and thermal degradation. The content of hydroxyprogesterone caproate in pharmaceutical products was evaluated after using two different sterilization methods and after exposure to light. Hydroxyprogesterone caproate and its degradation products were analyzed using a validated reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Variables examined included specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, theoretical plate numbers, signal:noise ratio, resolution between any two peaks, and relative standard deviation of the peak response. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata software, version 11 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Mean values and standard deviations were calculated. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Components of hydroxyprogesterone caproate and organic impurities in pharmaceutical products were scanned with wide ultraviolet wavelength from 200 to 400 nm. In powder form, hydroxyprogesterone caproate was stable when exposed to high temperatures and light. Considerable degradation of hydroxyprogesterone caproate was observed in alkaline solution, with the major degradation product being hydroxyprogesterone. Much less degradation of hydroxyprogesterone caproate was observed in acidic conditions over 72 hours. The content of hydroxyprogesterone caproate in pharmaceutical products was not altered by the sterilization methods (filtration or heat sterilization) used and after exposure to light. CONCLUSION: Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in powder form and in a pharmaceutical formulation under different experimental conditions appeared to be fairly stable in the presence of strong acid, high temperatures, and light.

Quality assessment of compounded 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of compounded 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC). STUDY DESIGN: Compounded 17-OHPC that was obtained from 15 compounding pharmacies throughout the United States was analyzed for potency, impurities, sterility, and pyrogen status. RESULTS: Eighteen samples were supplied by 15 compounding pharmacies. The concentration of 17-OHPC in all samples was within the specification limits, and all tested samples passed sterility and pyrogen testing. Only 1 of 18 samples was out of specification limits for impurities. CONCLUSION: Compounded 17-OHPC that was obtained from 15 pharmacies throughout the United States did not raise safety concerns when assessed for potency, sterility, pyrogen status, or impurities.

Qualitative and quantitative measures of various compounded formulations of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

OBJECTIVE: 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) is available both as an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication and as a product prepared for individual patients by compounding pharmacies. Compounding pharmacies may omit the preservative that is used in the FDA-approved formulation or use an alternate preservative and may dispense 17-OHPC in containers that differ from the FDA-approved product. The objective of this study was to assess the stability and the microbiologic and pyrogen status of 17-OHPC formulations under various compounding and dispensing conditions. STUDY DESIGN: 17-OHPC was prepared by a local compounding pharmacy. The formulations that were prepared included 1 identical to the FDA-approved product with benzyl alcohol as a preservative, 1 with benzalkonium chloride as a preservative, and 1 without a preservative. These various formulations were dispensed into either single-dose 1-mL plastic syringes or glass vials or 10-mL glass vials. The concentration of 17-OHPC and microbial and pyrogen status were evaluated at various time intervals over the ensuing 19 weeks. RESULTS: The concentration of 17-OHPC did not change over the duration of study, regardless of the dispensing medium that was used or the absence or presence of any preservatives. The preparations remained microbe- and pyrogen-free during the study period, regardless of the dispensing medium that was used or the absence of presence of any preservatives. CONCLUSION: Products that contained 17-OHPC tested in this study were quite stable over the 19-week period of study in different dispensing containers and in the absence or presence of a different preservative. The compounded products remained sterile and pyrogen-free during the period of observation.

Quality investigation of hydroxyprogesterone caproate active pharmaceutical ingredient and injection.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality of hydroxyprogesterone caproate (HPC) active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) sources that may be used by compounding pharmacies, compared to the FDA-approved source of the API; and to investigate the quality of HPC injection samples obtained from compounding pharmacies in the US, compared to the FDA-approved product (Makena(®)). Samples of API were obtained from every source confirmed to be an original manufacturer of the drug for human use, which were all companies in China that were not registered with FDA. Eight of the ten API samples (80%) did not meet the impurity specifications required by FDA for the API used in the approved product. One API sample was found to not be HPC at all; additional laboratory testing showed that it was glucose. Thirty samples of HPC injection obtained from compounding pharmacies throughout the US were also tested, and eight of these samples (27%) failed to meet the potency requirement listed in the USP monograph for HPC injection and/or the HPLC assay. Sixteen of the thirty injection samples (53%) exceeded the impurity limit set for the FDA-approved drug product. These results confirm the inconsistency of compounded HPC Injections and suggest that the risk-benefit ratio of using an unapproved compounded preparation, when an FDA-approved drug product is available, is not favorable.

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and sid effects.

A phase III clinical study was carried out among 5680 fertile Chinese women to evaluate efficacy and side effects of three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Chinese Injectable No. 1. When used in a once-a-month treatment schedule (part 1 of study), the effectiveness of Chinese Injectable No. 1 was unacceptably low; 36 pregnancies occurred during the first 1743 women-months of use, 16 before the second injection. The study was restarted with a revised injection schedule for Injectable No. 1: two injections separated by 9 +/- 1 days during the first month and subsequent injections given 10-12 days after the onset of bleeding, or if no bleeding occurred, 28 days after previous injection. In part 2 of the study, 988, 990 and 992 subjects were provided Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively. Life-table pregnancy rates at one year were 0.41%, 0% and 0.77% (p < 0.05), respectively; the overall discontinuation rates at one year were 13.9%, 19.1% and 20.4% (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates for bleeding problems were significantly different between the groups: discontinuation rates for amenorrhea were 0.58%, 3.71% and 0.68% (p < 0.001) for Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1; for other bleeding problems, the rates were 4.88%, 8.38% and 12.64% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding discontinuation for other medical or non-medical reasons. Mean weight changes after one year of use were small: 0.73, 0.86 and 0.17 kg for the three groups, respectively. Both Mesigyna and Cyclofem were very effective for contraception, but Mesigyna appeared to be tolerated slightly better with regard to cycle control; the modified dose regimen for Injectable No. 1 also gave a low pregnancy rate but was associated with higher rates of discontinuation.

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns.

Between 1988 and 1992, a randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted in China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries provided by 5098 (89%) of the subjects. In total, 902, 903 and 913 diaries were analyzed to compare bleeding patterns induced by Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. The first withdrawal bleeding usually occurs 14-20 days after the first injection for all three of these preparations. Thereafter, 50% of Mesigyna users had precisely 3 bleeding/spotting episodes every 90 days, 50% of Cyclofem users had 2-3 and 50% of Injectable No. 1 users had 3-4 episodes every 90 days. Relative to users of Mesigyna or Cyclofem, Injectable No. 1 users had 2-3 more bleeding/spotting days, and a shorter length of bleeding/spotting-free intervals in each period. 63.7%, 41.4% and 60.6% of subjects using Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively, had bleeding patterns similar to their untreated patterns in the first 90-day period. The percentages increased to 82.2% 67.8% and 75.0% in the fourth 90-day period. A total of 1815 diaries for Mesigyna and 1802 for Cyclofem were analyzed for more in depth comparison of these two methods. The number of bleeding/spotting days over four periods showed little difference between the two group, but there were more spotting days and there was greater individual variability among Cyclofem users.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PIP: Between October 1988 and July 1990, a randomized multicentered phase III clinical trial was conducted in three provinces of China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives (Mesigyna [50 mg norethisterone enanthate + 5 mg estradiol valerate], Cyclofem [25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate + 5 mg estradiol cypionate], and Injectable No.1 [250 mg 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate + 5 mg estradiol valerate]). A detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries of 5098 women aged 18-35 years compared the vaginal bleeding patterns associated with the injectables. Women in all three groups experienced more bleeding/spotting (B/S) days, more bleeding episodes, shorter bleeding-free intervals, and larger variability during the first 90 days than during the following three 90-day periods (p 0.001). 90% of Cyclofem users had 1-4 B/S episodes. 90% of Mesigyna users had 2-4.2 B/S episodes. Cyclofem users had more spotting days than did Mesigyna users in each 90-day period (5-8 vs. 5-6). Acceptable bleeding patterns (i.e., bleeding patterns similar to untreated patterns) predominated, on the most part, in all four periods (63.7-82.2% for Mesigyna users, 41.4-67.8% for Cyclofem users, and 60.6-75% for Injectable No.1 users). Acceptability increased with each 90-day period for all three injectables. Acceptability of bleeding patterns was much higher among Mesigyna users than Cyclofem users (p 0.001). Prolonged bleeding, followed by irregular bleeding and frequent bleeding, were the most common bleeding disturbances. Irregular bleeding decreased with time. 79.1% of Mesigyna and Cyclofem users who finished the study had an acceptable pattern. 70.7% of women who stopped for non-bleeding reasons had an acceptable pattern compared to 31.3% of those who stopped for bleeding reasons. These findings show that Mesigyna users experienced better cycle control and more acceptable bleeding patterns than did the users of the other two injectables.