Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 5.806
Filter
3.
Med Clin North Am ; 108(4): 757-776, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816116

ABSTRACT

Stinging insects are a frequent cause of local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. For those with a history of life-threatening anaphylaxis, venom immunotherapy is effective, safe, and can be life-saving. Arachnids are a much less common source of envenomation through bites or stings and are less likely to cause a hypersensitivity reaction. However, recognizing the clinical manifestations when they do present is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment, and, when indicated, consideration of other diagnoses.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Insect Bites and Stings , Humans , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Anaphylaxis/therapy , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Animals , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Arthropod Venoms/adverse effects , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Venom Hypersensitivity
4.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(6): 317-322, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776041

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to deliver a comprehensive report of the most recent knowledge on diagnosing allergic dermatoses in skin of color (SOC) patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Allergic dermatoses can affect populations of all backgrounds. However, racial/ethnic variations in epidemiology, clinical features, and associated allergens have been reported. Nuances in the approach to diagnosis, including the assessment of erythema and interpretation of patch tests, are important considerations when treating patients with SOC. In this review, we outline various manifestations of allergic dermatoses in SOC with a focus on important clinical presentations and diagnostic tools, aiming to support clinicians in accurate recognition of diseases, thereby opening avenues to improve outcomes across diverse skin types.


Subject(s)
Skin Pigmentation , Humans , Allergens/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Skin/pathology , Skin/immunology , Patch Tests
5.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(5): 711-718, 2024 May 06.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715514

ABSTRACT

The human body, as a highly complex ecosystem, harbors diverse microbial communities, with major factors triggering allergic reactions encompassing the skin microbiome and fungi. The global diversity of fungi is estimated to range from approximately 600 000 to 1 million species, and theoretically, IgE-mediated sensitization may occur to any fungal species. As of now, the World Health Organization/IUIS official database records 113 fungal allergens originating from 30 different fungi species, covering 42 allergen families. Regarding the skin microbiome, 14 distinct Malassezia allergens have been identified, all derived from three different Malassezia fungi species--M. furfur, M. sympodialis, and M. globosa. The conditions of patients with these allergies are exceptionally complex. This article extensively discusses the latest research advancements and clinical applications related to skin microbiome and fungal allergies from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) publication, "Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0". Additionally, it compiles information on the sources of fungal allergens, characteristics of allergen component protein families, clinical relevance, and management strategies, both domestically and internationally. The aim is to enhance the profound understanding of allergen components among relevant professionals. Through the application of advanced allergen component diagnostic techniques, the goal is to achieve precise diagnosis and treatment of fungal allergy patients and explore the mechanisms underlying fungal sensitization and pathogenesis, laying the foundation for studying the fungal allergen protein sensitization spectrum in the Chinese population.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Fungi , Hypersensitivity , Microbiota , Allergens/immunology , Humans , Fungi/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Fungal Proteins/immunology , Skin/microbiology , Malassezia/immunology
6.
Am J Reprod Immunol ; 91(5): e13865, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775338

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Seminal plasma hypersensitivity (SPH) is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition characterized by local and/or systemic reactions to seminal plasma proteins following exposure to semen. We aimed to summarize key symptomatology, diagnostic features, and management options for SPH. METHODS: The databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Review were searched with key words "seminal plasma hypersensitivity" and "seminal fluid allergy" through September 2023. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, in vitro studies, publication before 1990, duplicates, and articles with no clinical relevance to SPH in women. RESULTS: The search yielded 53 articles for review. Of these, 60.5% described systemic SPH and 39.5% described localized. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of SPH relies on a thorough patient history and confirmatory skin prick testing. The use of IgE assays is controversial and less accurate for cases of localized SPH. Knowledge of disease immunopathology, systemic versus localized symptom presentation, patient preference, and desire to conceive should guide management options. Artificial insemination has the potential for severe adverse reactions in systemic SPH so necessitates extra procedural precautions. SPH does not appear to impair fertility. Additional research on specific allergens implicated in SPH can aid in the development of more targeted immunotherapy approaches with improved safety and efficacy.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Semen , Humans , Male , Allergens/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Insemination, Artificial , Semen/immunology , Seminal Plasma Proteins/immunology , Skin Tests , Female
7.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 730-737, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost, healthcare utilization, and outcomes between skin and serum-specific IgE (sIgE) allergy testing. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used IBM® MarketScan claims data, from which commercially insured individuals who initiated allergy testing between January 1 and December 31, 2018 with at least 12 months of enrollment data before and after index testing date were included. Cost of allergy testing per patient was estimated by testing pattern: skin only, sIgE only, or both. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare healthcare utilization and outcomes, including office visits, allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) visits between skin and sIgE testing at 1-year post testing (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The cohort included 168,862 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (19.5) years; 100,666 (59.7%) were female. Over half of patients (56.4%, n = 95,179) had skin only testing, followed by 57,291 patients with sIgE only testing and 16,212 patients with both testing. The average cost of allergy testing per person in the first year was $430 (95% CI $426-433) in patients with skin only testing, $187 (95% CI $183-190) in patients with sIgE only testing, and $532 (95% CI $522-542) in patients with both testing. At 1-year follow-up post testing, there were slight increases in allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and notable decreases in ED visits by 17.0-17.4% and in UC visits by 10.9-12.6% for all groups (all p < 0.01). Patients with sIgE-only testing had 3.2 fewer allergist/immunologist visits than patients with skin-only testing at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Their healthcare utilization and outcomes were otherwise comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Allergy testing, regardless of the testing method used, is associated with decreases in ED and UC visits at 1-year follow-up. sIgE allergy testing is associated with lower testing cost and fewer allergist/immunologist visits, compared to skin testing.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin E , Insurance Claim Review , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Skin Tests , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/economics , Infant , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9932, 2024 04 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689009

ABSTRACT

Survey studies have played a significant role in understanding the gaps in the knowledge and practices of health practitioners. However, there have been no such survey studies on Ocular Allergy (OA). Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a survey on OA to better understand the gaps in the diagnostic, treatment, and collaborative care approaches of health practitioners in OA. The survey is titled "Survey on Ocular Allergy for Health Practitioners (SOAHP)". SOAHP was developed in a five-stage process. First, item extraction via the use of a literature review, second, face and content validity, third, a pilot study, fourth, test-retest reliability, and fifth, finalisation of the survey. 65 items under 6 domains were initially generated in the item extraction phase. Content validity was conducted on 15 experts in the field. This was conducted twice to reach consensus whereby items and domains were added, edited, kept, or removed, resulting in 50 items under 7 domains. The pilot study was conducted on 15 participants from the five relevant health practitioner fields (Allergists/Immunologists, General Practitioners (GPs), Ophthalmologists, Optometrists and Pharmacists). This altered the survey further to 40 items under 7 domains. Test-retest reliability was conducted on 25 participants from the five health practitioner fields. Reliability was moderate to almost perfect for most (97%) investigated items. The finalised survey was 40 items under 7 domains. SOAHP is the first survey created to assess diagnostic, treatment and collaborative care approaches of Allergists/Immunologists, GPs, Ophthalmologists, Optometrists and Pharmacists on OA. SOAHP will be a useful tool in clinical research on OA.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Ophthalmologists , General Practitioners , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Male , Optometrists , Pharmacists
9.
BMC Immunol ; 25(1): 23, 2024 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry-based basophil activation tests (BAT) have been performed with various modifications, differing in the use of distinct identification and activation markers. Established tests use liquid reagents while a new development involves the use of tubes with dried antibody reagents. The aim of this pilot study was to compare these two techniques in patients with insect venom allergy. METHODS: Seventeen patients with an insect venom allergy were included in the study. The established "BAT 1" utilizes conventional antibody solutions of anti-CCR3 for basophil identification and anti-CD63 to assess basophil activation, whereas "BAT 2" uses dried anti-CD45, anti-CD3, anti-CRTH2, anti-203c and anti-CD63 for identification and activation measurement of basophils. Negative and positive controls as well as incubations with honey bee venom and yellow jacket venom at three concentrations were performed. RESULTS: Seven patients had to be excluded due to low basophil counts, high values in negative controls or negative positive controls. For the remaining 10 patients the overall mean (± SD) difference in activated basophils between the two tests was 0.2 (± 12.2) %P. In a Bland-Altman plot, the limit of agreement (LoA) ranged from 24.0 to -23.7. In the qualitative evaluation (value below/above cut-off) Cohen's kappa was 0.77 indicating substantial agreement. BAT 2 took longer to perform than BAT 1 and was more expensive. CONCLUSION: The BAT 2 technique represents an interesting innovation, however, it was found to be less suitable compared to an established BAT for the routine diagnosis of insect venom allergies.


Subject(s)
Basophils , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Basophils/immunology , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Flow Cytometry/methods , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Pilot Projects , Animals , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Bee Venoms/immunology , Young Adult , Aged , Antibodies/immunology , Adolescent , Basophil Degranulation Test/methods , Venom Hypersensitivity
10.
Semin Dial ; 37(3): 189-199, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433728

ABSTRACT

Kidney replacement therapies (KRTs) including hemodialysis (HD) are one of the treatment options for most of the patients with end-stage kidney disease. Although HD is vital for these patients, it is not hundred percent physiological, and various adverse events including hypersensitivity reactions may occur. Fortunately, these reactions are rare in total and less when compared to previous decades, but it is still very important for at least two reasons: First, the number of patients receiving kidney replacement treatment is increasing globally; and the cumulative number of these reactions may be substantial. Second, although most of these reactions are mild, some of them may be very severe and even lead to mortality. Thus, it is very important to have basic knowledge and skills to diagnose and treat these reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur at any component of dialysis machinery (access, extracorporeal circuit, medications, etc.). The most important preventive measure is to avoid the allergen. However, even with very specific test, sometimes the allergen cannot be found. In mild conditions, HD can be contained with non-specific treatment (topical creams, antihistaminics, corticosteroids). In more severe conditions, treatment must be stopped immediately, blood should not be returned to patient, drugs must be stopped, and rules of general emergency treatment must be followed.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Renal Dialysis , Humans , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy
13.
Ophthalmologie ; 121(3): 172, 2024 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38443619
17.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(5): 1150-1152, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316183

ABSTRACT

The spectacular advances of modern medicine have distracted clinicians from applying the age-old principles of thorough history and examination followed by only ordering tests relevant to the patient's presentation. The most obvious diagnosis is the most likely and should be addressed first. Ockham's razor, or parsimonious medicine, should be applied because plurality of diagnoses is less likely than a single explanation. Component-resolved diagnostics and biological therapies for allergy/immune-mediated diseases have been highly effective when used by specialist allergy services. However, they are accessed too easily and frequently, either before diagnostically appropriate allergy skin testing and challenge have been employed or before the reasons for poor disease control have been investigated. The current fashion to test for vitamin D insufficiency in patients with poorly controlled allergic diseases has rarely achieved benefit but significantly increased costs. There are considerable health/economic benefits from following the proven value of a thorough clinical history, examination, focused allergy/immunology testing, and the judicious use of Ockham's razor.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology , Hypersensitivity , Humans , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...