Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.634
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11436, 2024 05 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763944

ABSTRACT

Safe delivery of care is a priority in dentistry, while basic epidemiological knowledge of patient safety incidents is still lacking. The objectives of this study were to (1) classify patient safety incidents related to primary dental care in Denmark in the period 2016-2020 and study the distribution of different types of dental treatment categories where harm occurred, (2) clarify treatment categories leading to "nerve injury" and "tooth loss" and (3) assess the financial cost of patient-harm claims. Data from the Danish Dental Compensation Act (DDCA) database was retrieved from all filed cases from 1st January 2016 until 31st December 2020 pertaining to: (1) The reason why the patient applied for treatment-related harm compensation, (2) the event that led to the alleged harm (treatment category), (3) the type of patient-harm, and (4) the financial cost of all harm compensations. A total of 9069 claims were retrieved, of which 5079 (56%) were found eligible for compensation. The three most frequent categories leading to compensation were "Root canal treatment and post preparation"(n = 2461, 48% of all approved claims), "lack of timely diagnosis and initiation of treatment" (n = 905, 18%) and "surgery" (n = 878, 17%). Damage to the root of the tooth accounted for more than half of all approved claims (54.36%), which was most frequently a result of either parietal perforation during endodontic treatment (18.54%) or instrument fracture (18.89%). Nerve injury accounted for 16.81% of the approved claims. Total cost of all compensation payments was €16,309,310, 41.1% of which was related to surgery (€6,707,430) and 20.4% (€3,322,927) to endodontic treatment. This comprehensive analysis documents that harm permeates all aspects of dentistry, especially in endodontics and surgery. Neglect or diagnostic delays contribute to 18% of claims, indicating that harm does not solely result from direct treatment. Treatment harm inflicts considerable societal costs.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Iatrogenic Disease , Patient Safety , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease/economics , Denmark , Dental Care/economics , Dentistry , Patient Harm/economics
2.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 197-201, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561302

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of iatrogenic skin injuries in neonates across 22 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: 22 NICUs in China. PATIENTS: Infants admitted to NICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: The "Iatrogenic Skin Injuries Data Collection Form of infants" were used to collect the data during hospitalization. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 8126 neonates who were hospitalized in 22 tertiary hospitals across 15 provinces, cities, and autonomous regions of China between December 1, 2019 and January 31, 2020 were analyzed. Five hundred and twenty-one infants had iatrogenic skin injuries, including 250 with diaper dermatitis (47.98%), 70 with physicochemical factor-related skin lesions (PCFRSIs) (13.44%), 81 with medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs) (15.55%), and 69 with medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSIs) (13.24%), accounting for 91% of the total number of iatrogenic injuries. Among these, diaper dermatitis was closely related to the skin and feeding status. Furthermore, the risk was higher among neonates who had skin damage upon admission or were already fully fed orally. The influencing factors of MDRPIs and MARSIs were similar. They were negatively associated with gestational age and birth weight, and were closely related to the presence of various tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Diaper dermatitis, PCFRSIs, MDRPIs, and MARSIs were the four common types of iatrogenic skin injuries in newborns. The various types of iatrogenic skin injuries were influenced by varying factors. Specialized nursing measurements can reduce the likelihood of these injuries.


Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Infant, Newborn , China/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Male , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Female , Incidence , Infant , Skin/injuries , East Asian People
3.
Maturitas ; 185: 108004, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663162

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the uptake of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cervical cancer patients with iatrogenic menopause. Survival in relation to HRT use was assessed via a retrospective chart study, and the severity of menopausal symptoms, motivations and barriers to starting HRT were examined via questionnaires. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 293 women under the age of 51 and treated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2020 were identified. Medical records were searched for information on HRT use. If still living, women were sent digital questionnaires addressing menopausal symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and potential barriers and motivations concerning HRT use. Univariable data were analysed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test, while logistical regression was used to analyse relationships between certain variables and use of HRT and survival. RESULTS: Overall HRT uptake was 78.1 %, which was related to age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, but independent of the duration of radiotherapy or FIGO stage. Overall survival was higher for HRT users (χ2(1) = 4.3, p = 0.038). Questionnaires were sent to 193 patients and 100 completed it (response rate 51.8 %). Main reasons for HRT use were relief of hot flushes and improvement in QoL. For women below age 51, QoL was indeed higher for current HRT users than for non-HRT users (EQ-index 0.8 vs. 0.7, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: HRT prescription rate was inversely correlated with age. Survival was not negatively affected by HRT use. It is important to stress the benefits of HRT and address women's fears regarding its use.


Subject(s)
Hormone Replacement Therapy , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency , Quality of Life , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/etiology , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects
4.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(6): 903-909, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefits of prophylactic ureteral stent placement during colorectal surgery remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the incidence of ureteral injury in colorectal operations, assess the complications associated with stent usage, and determine whether their use leads to earlier identification and treatment of injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing colorectal abdominal operations between 2015 and 2021. Variables were examined for possible association with ureteral stent placement. The primary study endpoint was ureteral injury identified within 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Of 6481 patients who underwent colorectal surgery, 970 (15%) underwent preoperative ureteral stent placement. The use of stents was significantly associated with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound classification, and longer duration of surgery. A ureteral injury was identified in 28 patients (0.4%). Of these patients, 13 had no stent, and 15 had preoperative stents placed. After propensity matching, stent use was associated with an increased risk of hematuria and urinary tract infection. Ureteral injury was identified intraoperatively in 14 of 28 patients (50.0%) and was not associated with ureteral stent use (P = .45). CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic ureteral injury was uncommon, whereas preoperative stent placement was relatively frequent. Earlier recognition of iatrogenic ureteral injury is not an expected advantage of preoperative ureteral stent placement.


Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease , Intraoperative Complications , Stents , Ureter , Humans , Stents/adverse effects , Ureter/injuries , Ureter/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Preoperative Care/methods , Hematuria/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Operative Time
5.
N Engl J Med ; 390(6): 522-529, 2024 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38324485

ABSTRACT

A multinational outbreak of nosocomial fusarium meningitis occurred among immunocompetent patients who had undergone surgery with epidural anesthesia in Mexico. The pathogen involved had a high predilection for the brain stem and vertebrobasilar arterial system and was associated with high mortality from vessel injury. Effective treatment options remain limited; in vitro susceptibility testing of the organism suggested that it is resistant to all currently approved antifungal medications in the United States. To highlight the severe complications associated with fusarium infection acquired in this manner, we report data, clinical courses, and outcomes from 13 patients in the outbreak who presented with symptoms after a median delay of 39 days.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Fusariosis , Fusarium , Iatrogenic Disease , Meningitis, Fungal , Humans , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Fusariosis/epidemiology , Fusariosis/etiology , Fusarium/isolation & purification , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Meningitis, Fungal/epidemiology , Meningitis, Fungal/etiology , Mexico/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Internationality , Immunocompetence , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects
6.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(3): 1-9, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) rates and composition of HAPI stages among hospitalized patients across the US. METHODS: Using encounter-level data from a nationwide healthcare insurance claims database, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study and an interrupted time-series analysis to determine HAPI rates among hospitalized patients within 90 days of admission before (January 2018 to February 2020) and after (March 2020 to December 2020) the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 3,418,438 adult patients assessed for inclusion in the study, 1,750,494 met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes measured included the presence of a HAPI within 90 days of admission and HAPI stage based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis codes. RESULTS: The authors identified HAPIs in 59,175 episodes of care, representing 59,019 unique patients and corresponding to an overall HAPI rate of 2.65%. Baseline characteristics did not vary significantly across the two time periods. Further, HAPI rates were consistent across the time periods analyzed with no significant differences in rates following the onset of the pandemic (P = .303). Composition of HAPI stages remained consistent across the pandemic (unspecified, stages 1-4, Ps = .62, .80, .22, .23, and .52, respectively) except for a significant decrease in unstageable/deep tissue pressure injuries (-0.088%, P = .0134). CONCLUSIONS: Although hospital resources were strained at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, no differences were identified in HAPI rates among the study's cohort of privately insured patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pressure Ulcer , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pandemics , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology
7.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 141(3): 133-137, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423860

ABSTRACT

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic may increase the incidence of iatrogenic laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS), whereas management is not well defined. The aim of this study was to survey a panel of French otorhinolaryngologists about their practices and to evaluate their needs. METHOD: A national-level survey of the management of iatrogenic LTS was conducted using a 41-item questionnaire, in 4 sections, sent to a panel of French otorhinolaryngologists between July and December 2022. The main endpoint was heterogeneity in responses between 55 proposals on LTS management. RESULTS: The response rate was 20% (52/263). The response heterogeneity rate was 69% (38/55). Heterogeneity concerned general questions on diagnosis (7/12, 58%) and management (7/10, 70%), LTS case management (22/27, 81%), and otorhinolaryngologists' expectations (33%, 2/6). Quality of training was considered good or excellent by only 21% of respondents. More than 80% were strongly in favor of creating national guidelines, expert centers and a national database. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated the heterogeneity of adult post-intubation LTS management between otorhinolaryngologists in France. Training quality was deemed poor or mediocre by a majority of respondents. They were in favor of creating national guidelines and expert centers in LTS.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intubation, Intratracheal , Laryngostenosis , Tracheal Stenosis , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Tracheal Stenosis/etiology , Tracheal Stenosis/epidemiology , Laryngostenosis/etiology , Laryngostenosis/epidemiology , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Otolaryngology
8.
J Visc Surg ; 161(1): 6-14, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242812

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a rare but formidable complication of any abdominal or pelvic surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of IUI in colorectal surgery in the Basse-Normandie region over the period 2004-2022, as well as to review the literature on the management of this complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective analysis of clinical data (medical records and operative reports) concerned 22 patients (13 men and 9 women) who suffered an IUI during colorectal surgery between 2004 and 2022. Ureteral resections for oncological purposes and endoluminal instrumental injuries (post-ureteroscopy) were excluded from the study. We also carried out a review of the literature concerning the incidence of IUI in colorectal surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of IUI was 0.27% over the study period (22 ureteral injuries out of 8129 colorectal procedures). Colorectal cancer and sigmoid diverticulitis were the dominant surgical indications (85% of cases). Proctectomy and left colectomy were the most performed resection procedures (75% of cases). Surgery was scheduled in 68% of cases. The approach was open laparotomy in 59% and laparoscopy in 41% of cases. The IUI involved the left ureter in 63% of cases and the pelvic ureter in 77% of cases. Conservative endoscopic treatment by insertion of a double-J catheter stent had a success rate of 87.5%. Surgical repairs consisting of re-implantation techniques and uretero-ureteral anastomosis had a success rate of 75%. The nephrectomy rate was 13.6% (3/22) and the mortality rate 9% (2/22). A literature review identified sixteen studies, where the incidence of IUI varied from 0.1 to 4.5%. FINDINGS: IUI occurring during colorectal surgery is a rare occurrence but remain a formidable complication. No means of prevention has proven its effectiveness to date, but guidance devices using illuminated ureteral catheters or dyes seem to constitute a promising approach. Injuries to the left pelvic ureter are the most common, and the majority can be treated endoscopically if diagnosed early.


Subject(s)
Surgeons , Ureter , Male , Humans , Female , Ureter/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Colectomy/methods , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Multicenter Studies as Topic
9.
Urol Pract ; 11(2): 385-393, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215014

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic injury during urethral catheterization is a common reason for inpatient urologic consultation and is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. Literature defining the patient population, interventions, or outcomes associated with traumatic catheterization is scarce. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consults for adult urethral catheterization at a single tertiary care center (July 2017-December 2019), with focus on patient characteristics and complications. Traumatic urethral catheterization was defined as catheterization by the primary team with at least 1 of these conditions: gross hematuria, meatal blood, or cystoscopic evidence of urethral trauma. Characteristics collected included urologic history, catheterization circumstances, procedural intervention, and subsequent visits. RESULTS: Three hundred urology consults for urethral catheterization were identified, including 98 (33%) traumatic events (5.3 incidents/1000 catheters placed). All traumatic catheterization consults were in men (median age 69 years). Most (71%) patients sustaining injury had significant urologic history (eg, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urethral stricture). Sixty-three (64%) consults were determined to be uncomplicated (not requiring any procedural intervention for catheter placement). Gross hematuria was the most common sequela (50% of patients). The 30-day catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate was 13%, and 2 patients developed sepsis. Complications required a total of 52 additional hospital admission days, 19 of which were intensive-care level, as well 113 outpatient urology visits. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic urethral catheterization is associated with increased need for procedural intervention, risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and additional resource utilization. Further studies on traumatic catheterization are needed to guide systemic efforts for minimizing injury and cost.


Subject(s)
Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Tract Infections , Male , Adult , Humans , Aged , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Hematuria/epidemiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology
10.
Surg Today ; 54(4): 291-309, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36593285

ABSTRACT

Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) during colorectal surgery is a rare complication but related to a serious burden of morbidity. This comprehensive and systematic review aims to provide a critical overview of the most recent literature about IUI prevention techniques in colorectal surgery. We performed a comprehensive and systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 and assessed the use of techniques for ureteral injury prevention and intraoperative localization. 26 publications were included, divided into stent-based (prophylactic/lighted ureteral stent and near-infrared fluorescent ureteral catheter [PUS/LUS/NIRFUC]) and fluorescent dye (FD) groups. Costs, the percentage and number of IUIs detected, reported limitations, complication rates and other outcome points were compared. The IUI incidence rate ranged from 0 to 1.9% (mean 0.5%) and 0 to 1.2% (mean 0.3%) in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC and FD groups, respectively. The acute kidney injury (AKI) and urinary tact infection (UTI) incidence rate ranged from 0.4 to 32.6% and 0 to 17.3%, respectively, in the PUS/LUS/NIRFUC group and 0-15% and 0-6.3%, respectively, in the FD group. Many other complications were also compared and descriptively analyzed (length-of-stay, mortality, etc.). These techniques appear to be feasible and safe in select patients with a high risk of IUI, but the delineation of reliable guidelines for preventing IUI will require more randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Ureter , Humans , Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects , Ureter/injuries , Incidence , Stents , Fluorescent Dyes , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control
11.
Stroke ; 55(1): 177-181, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current fungal meningitis outbreak caused by contaminated epidural anesthesia with Fusarium solani among patients who underwent surgical procedures in Matamoros, Mexico remains a cause of concern. Its association with an increased susceptibility for cerebrovascular complications (CVC) has not been reported. This single-center study describes 3 patients with a unique pattern of CVC attributed to fungal meningitis. METHODS: A retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with fungal meningitis following surgical procedures under contaminated epidural anesthesia who developed a unique pattern of CVC during their hospitalization. RESULTS: Three female patients (mean age, 35 years) with CVC due to iatrogenic fungal meningitis were included. Positive Fungitell ß-D-glucan assay in cerebrospinal fluid was documented in all cases, and F. solani was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction in case 3. All cases were complicated by severe vertebrobasilar circulation vasculopathy and arterial dissections with resultant subarachnoid hemorrhage and intraventricular hemorrhage, ultimately leading to patients' death. CONCLUSIONS: The death toll from the ongoing fungal meningitis outbreak keeps rising, underscoring the need for early recognition and aggressive treatment. We highlight the risk for vertebrobasilar circulation CVC among these patients. The angioinvasive nature of F. solani is yet to be clarified; however, a clear pattern has been observed. Public health awareness should be raised and a strong response should be pursued.


Subject(s)
Meningitis, Fungal , Methylprednisolone , Humans , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , Meningitis, Fungal/epidemiology , Meningitis, Fungal/etiology , Meningitis, Fungal/diagnosis , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology
12.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 100(4): 350-357, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37807424

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine all-cause in-hospital mortality associated with severe hypernatraemia and the causes, comorbidities, time to treatment, discharge destination and postdischarge mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. PATIENTS: Severe hypernatraemia, (sodium concentration ≥ 155 mmol/L), at any time during a tertiary hospital admission in Melbourne, Australia, 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 (pre-COVID19). MEASUREMENTS: Deaths, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), hypernatraemia causes, time to treatment, discharge destination. RESULTS: One hundred and one inpatients: 64 community-acquired, 37 hospital-acquired. In-hospital mortality was 38%, but cumulative mortality was 65% by 1 month after discharge, with only a minor further increase at 6 and 12 months. After adjusting for peak sodium concentration, the community acquired group had significantly reduced odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.15, 95% confidence interval [0.04-0.54], p = .003). Iatrogenic factors were present in 57% (21/37) of the hospital-acquired group. Only 55% of all cases received active sodium directed treatment. Time to start treatment did not affect outcomes. High levels of comorbidity were present, median CCI (IQR) was 6 (5-8) in the community and 5 (4-7) in the hospital group. Dementia prevalence was higher in the community group, 66% (42/64) versus 19% (7/37) (p = .001). Infection was the most common precipitant with 52% (33/64) in the community and 32% (12/37) in the hospital group. Of the survivors, 32% who had been living independently required residential care after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was high and loss of independence in survivors common. To potentially improve outcomes, hypernatraemia-specific guidelines should be formulated and efforts made to reduce system and iatrogenic factors.


Subject(s)
Hypernatremia , Humans , Hypernatremia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Inpatients , Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Sodium , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology
13.
JAMA ; 330(24): 2365-2375, 2023 12 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147093

ABSTRACT

Importance: The effects of private equity acquisitions of US hospitals on the clinical quality of inpatient care and patient outcomes remain largely unknown. Objective: To examine changes in hospital-acquired adverse events and hospitalization outcomes associated with private equity acquisitions of US hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from 100% Medicare Part A claims for 662 095 hospitalizations at 51 private equity-acquired hospitals were compared with data for 4 160 720 hospitalizations at 259 matched control hospitals (not acquired by private equity) for hospital stays between 2009 and 2019. An event study, difference-in-differences design was used to assess hospitalizations from 3 years before to 3 years after private equity acquisition using a linear model that was adjusted for patient and hospital attributes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-acquired adverse events (synonymous with hospital-acquired conditions; the individual conditions were defined by the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services as falls, infections, and other adverse events), patient mix, and hospitalization outcomes (including mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, and readmissions). Results: Hospital-acquired adverse events (or conditions) were observed within 10 091 hospitalizations. After private equity acquisition, Medicare beneficiaries admitted to private equity hospitals experienced a 25.4% increase in hospital-acquired conditions compared with those treated at control hospitals (4.6 [95% CI, 2.0-7.2] additional hospital-acquired conditions per 10 000 hospitalizations, P = .004). This increase in hospital-acquired conditions was driven by a 27.3% increase in falls (P = .02) and a 37.7% increase in central line-associated bloodstream infections (P = .04) at private equity hospitals, despite placing 16.2% fewer central lines. Surgical site infections doubled from 10.8 to 21.6 per 10 000 hospitalizations at private equity hospitals despite an 8.1% reduction in surgical volume; meanwhile, such infections decreased at control hospitals, though statistical precision of the between-group comparison was limited by the smaller sample size of surgical hospitalizations. Compared with Medicare beneficiaries treated at control hospitals, those treated at private equity hospitals were modestly younger, less likely to be dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, and more often transferred to other acute care hospitals after shorter lengths of stay. In-hospital mortality (n = 162 652 in the population or 3.4% on average) decreased slightly at private equity hospitals compared with the control hospitals; there was no differential change in mortality by 30 days after hospital discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: Private equity acquisition was associated with increased hospital-acquired adverse events, including falls and central line-associated bloodstream infections, along with a larger but less statistically precise increase in surgical site infections. Shifts in patient mix toward younger and fewer dually eligible beneficiaries admitted and increased transfers to other hospitals may explain the small decrease in in-hospital mortality at private equity hospitals relative to the control hospitals, which was no longer evident 30 days after discharge. These findings heighten concerns about the implications of private equity on health care delivery.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Hospitals, Private , Iatrogenic Disease , Medicare Part A , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Humans , Hospitals, Private/standards , Hospitals, Private/statistics & numerical data , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Medicare/standards , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Medicare Part A/standards , Medicare Part A/statistics & numerical data
14.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 36(11): 1-6, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37861671

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To implement a collaborative, interdisciplinary team approach to reducing hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) through nurse empowerment and engagement. METHODS: This quality improvement project was conducted at a 288-bed community hospital. The Donabedian model was used to design this intervention. The authors used a collaborative, interdisciplinary team approach for pressure injury prevention and management, utilizing nurse empowerment and engagement as driving forces to reduce HAPI rates. RESULTS: The incidence of HAPI decreased from a peak of 5.30% in April 2019 down to 0% from August 2019 to December 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure injuries are key quality indicators for patient safety and avoidance of patient harm. Through nurse empowerment and engagement, HAPIs were avoided, resulting in improved quality care outcomes and maintenance of a safe patient environment.


Subject(s)
Crush Injuries , Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Quality Improvement , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control , Hospitals, Community
15.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 77: 67-79, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37741163

ABSTRACT

Bipolar disorders (BD) are characterized by cognitive impairment during the euthymic phase, to which treatments can contribute. The anticholinergic properties of medications, i.e., the ability of a treatment to inhibit cholinergic receptors, are associated with cognitive impairment in elderly patients and people with schizophrenia but this association has not been well characterized in individuals with remitted BD. Moreover, the validity of only one anticholinergic burden scale designed to assess the anticholinergic load of medications has been tested in BD. In a literature review, we identified 31 existing scales. We first measured the associations between 27 out of the 31 scales and objective cognitive impairment in bivariable regressions. We then adjusted the bivariable models with covariates: the scales significantly associated with cognitive impairment in bivariable and multiple logistic regressions were defined as having good concurrent validity to assess cognitive impairment. In a sample of 2,031 individuals with euthymic BD evaluated with a neuropsychological battery, two scales had good concurrent validity to assess cognitive impairment, whereas chlorpromazine equivalents, lorazepam equivalents, the number of antipsychotics, or the number of treatments had not. Finally, similar analyses with subjective anticholinergic side-effects as outcome variables reported 14 scales with good concurrent validity to assess self-reported peripheral anticholinergic side-effects and 13 to assess self-reported central anticholinergic side-effects. Thus, we identified valid scales to monitor the anticholinergic burden in BD, which may be useful in estimating iatrogenic cognitive impairment in studies investigating cognition in BD.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Cognitive Dysfunction , Humans , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Self Report , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/chemically induced , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology
16.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 143(12): 7245-7253, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic nerve lesions during surgical interventions are avoidable complications that may cause severe functional impairment. Hereby, awareness of physicians and knowledge of structures and interventions at risk is of utmost importance for prevention. As current literature is scarce, we evaluated all patients treated surgically due to peripheral nerve injuries in our specialized nerve center for the presence of iatrogenic nerve lesions. METHODS: We evaluated a total of 5026 patients with peripheral nerve injuries treated over a time period of 8 years in our facility for the prevalence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, their clinical presentations, time to treatment, mechanisms and intraoperative findings on nerve continuity. RESULTS: A total of 360 (6.1%) patients had an iatrogenic cause resulting in 380 injured nerves. 76.6% of these lesions affected the main branch of the injured nerve, which were mainly the radial (30.5%), peroneal (13.7%) and median nerve (10.3%). After a mean delay of 237 ± 344 days, patients presented 23.2% with a motor and 27.9% with a mixed sensory and motor deficit. 72.6% of lesions were in-continuity lesions. Main interventions at risk are displayed for every nerve, frequently concerning osteosyntheses but also patient positioning and anesthesiologic interventions. DISCUSSION: Awareness of major surgical complications such as iatrogenic nerve injuries is important for surgeons. An often-seen trivialization or "watch and wait" strategy results in a huge delay for starting an adequate therapy. The high number of in-continuity lesions mainly in close proximity to osteosyntheses makes diagnosis and treatment planning a delicate challenge, especially due to the varying clinical presentations we found. Diagnostics and therapy should therefore be performed as early as possible in specialized centers capable of performing nerve repair as well as salvage therapies.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/etiology , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Median Nerve , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects
17.
J Neurol ; 270(12): 5819-5826, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and immunosuppressant/immunomodulatory drugs. MG is frequently diagnosed in elderly patients, a fragile population in which treatment adverse effects (TAE) have not been evaluated until now. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the files of all MG patients with disease onset after age 70 years in four French University Hospitals, including clinical, electrophysiological, biological, and treatment data, with an emphasis on TAE. MG outcomes were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) status scale. RESULTS: We included 138 patients (59% of men) with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (range 1-19). Mean age at diagnosis was 78 years (70-93). Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies were found in 87% of cases, electrophysiological abnormalities in 82%, and thymoma in 10%. MG outcome was good in a majority of cases, with 76% of treated patients presenting with alleviated symptoms at follow-up. TAE were observed in 41% of patients, including severe TAE in 14% of cases. Seven patients (5.1%) died, including four (2.9%) from MG-related respiratory failure, and three (2.2%) from MG treatment-related complications, i.e., sepsis in 2 cases and brain toxoplasmosis in 1 case. TAE were observed in 53% of patients treated with azathioprine, 23% of patients treated with corticosteroids, and 15% of patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates MG in the elderly presents with a significant iatrogenic risk, including fatal immunosuppressant-related infections.


Subject(s)
Myasthenia Gravis , Thymus Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Acetylcholinesterase , Myasthenia Gravis/complications , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Thymus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology
18.
Psychiatry Res ; 327: 115415, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37611327

ABSTRACT

Eating disorders, characterized by abnormal eating, weight control behaviors or both include anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). We investigated their potential iatrogenic triggers, using real-world data from the WHO safety database (VigiBase®). VigiBase® was queried for all AN and BN reports. The reports were classified as `pediatric' or `adult' according to age. Disproportionality analyses relied on the Information Component (IC), in which a 95% confidence interval lower-end positivity was required to suspect a signal. Our queries yielded 309 AN and 499 BN reports. Isotretinoin was disproportionately reported in pediatric AN (IC 3.6; [2.6-4.3]), adult AN (IC 3.1; [1.7-4.0]), and pediatric BN (IC 3.9; [3.0-4.7]). Lamivudine (IC 4.2; [3.2-4.9]), nevirapine (IC 3.7; [2.6-4.6]), and zidovudine (IC 3.4; [2.0-4.3]) had the highest ICs in adult AN. AN was associated with isotretinoin, anticonvulsants in minors, and antiretroviral drugs in adults. In adults, BN was related to psychotropic and hormonally active drugs. Before treatment initiation, an anamnesis should seek out mental health conditions, allowing the identification of patients at risk of developing or relapsing into AN or BN. In addition to misuse, the hypothesis of iatrogenic triggers for AN and BN should also be considered.


Subject(s)
Anorexia Nervosa , Bulimia Nervosa , Adult , Humans , Child , Anorexia Nervosa/etiology , Bulimia Nervosa/etiology , Isotretinoin , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , World Health Organization
19.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 45(5): 1167-1175, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, after exposure medication known to cause withdrawal is recognised, yet under described in adult intensive care. AIM: To investigate, opioid, sedation, and preadmission medication practice in critically ill adults with focus on aspects associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. METHOD: One-day point prevalence study in UK intensive care units (ICUs). We collected ICU admission medication and/or substances with withdrawal potential, sedation policy, opioid and sedative use, dose, and duration. RESULTS: Thirty-seven from 39 participating ICUs contributed data from 386 patients. The prevalence rate for parenteral opioid and sedative medication was 56.1% (212 patients). Twenty-three ICUs (59%) had no sedation/analgesia policy, and no ICUs screened for iatrogenic withdrawal. Patient admission medications with withdrawal-potential included antidepressants or antipsychotics (43, 20.3%) and nicotine (41, 19.3%). Of 212 patients, 202 (95.3%) received opioids, 163 (76.9%) sedatives and 153 (72.2%) both. Two hundred and two (95.3%) patients received opioids: 167 (82.7%) by continuous infusions and 90 (44.6%) patients for longer than 96-h. One hundred and sixty-three (76.9%) patients received sedatives: 157 (77.7%) by continuous infusions and 74 (45.4%) patients for longer than 96-h. CONCLUSION: Opioid sedative and admission medication with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome potential prevalence rates were high, and a high proportion of ICUs had no sedative/analgesic policies. Nearly half of patients received continuous opioids and sedatives for longer than 96-h placing them at high risk of iatrogenic withdrawal. No participating unit reported using a validated tool for iatrogenic withdrawal assessment.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Humans , Adult , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Prevalence , Critical Illness/therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/epidemiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
20.
Crit Care Med ; 51(11): 1502-1514, 2023 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) associated with opioid and sedative use for medical purposes has a reported high prevalence and associated morbidity. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, utilization, and characteristics of opioid and sedative weaning and IWS policies/protocols in the adult ICU population. DESIGN: International, multicenter, observational, point prevalence study. SETTING: Adult ICUs. PATIENTS: All patients aged 18 years and older in the ICU on the date of data collection who received parenteral opioids or sedatives in the previous 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICUs selected 1 day for data collection between June 1 and September 30, 2021. Patient demographic data, opioid and sedative medication use, and weaning and IWS assessment data were collected for the previous 24 hours. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients weaned from opioids and sedatives using an institutional policy/protocol on the data collection day. There were 2,402 patients in 229 ICUs from 11 countries screened for opioid and sedative use; 1,506 (63%) patients received parenteral opioids, and/or sedatives in the previous 24 hours. There were 90 (39%) ICUs with a weaning policy/protocol which was used in 176 (12%) patients, and 23 (10%) ICUs with an IWS policy/protocol which was used in 9 (0.6%) patients. The weaning policy/protocol for 47 (52%) ICUs did not define when to initiate weaning, and the policy/protocol for 24 (27%) ICUs did not specify the degree of weaning. A weaning policy/protocol was used in 34% (176/521) and IWS policy/protocol in 9% (9/97) of patients admitted to an ICU with such a policy/protocol. Among 485 patients eligible for weaning policy/protocol utilization based on duration of opioid/sedative use initiation criterion within individual ICU policies/protocols 176 (36%) had it used, and among 54 patients on opioids and/or sedatives ≥ 72 hours, 9 (17%) had an IWS policy/protocol used by the data collection day. CONCLUSIONS: This international observational study found that a small proportion of ICUs use policies/protocols for opioid and sedative weaning or IWS, and even when these policies/protocols are in place, they are implemented in a small percentage of patients.


Subject(s)
Analgesia , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Child , Humans , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Critical Illness/therapy , Weaning , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/epidemiology , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...