Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728496

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a disabling neurologic disorder resulting from the infection of the CNS by JC polyomavirus in immunocompromised individuals. For the last 2 decades, increasing use of immunotherapies leads to iatrogenic PML. Iatrogenic PML is often associated with signs of inflammation at onset (inflammatory PML) and/or after treatment withdrawal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (PML-IRIS). Although immune reconstitution is a key element for viral clearance, it may also be harmful and induce clinical worsening. A C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist (maraviroc) has been proposed to prevent and/or limit the deleterious immune responses underlying PML-IRIS. However, the data to support its use remain scarce and disputed. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 8 university hospitals in France and Switzerland by collecting clinical, biological, and radiologic data of patients who developed inflammatory PML (iPML) or PML-IRIS related to immunosuppressive therapies used for chronic inflammatory diseases between 2010 and 2020. We added to this cohort, a meta-analysis of individual case reports of patients with iPML/PML-IRIS treated with maraviroc published up to 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 27 cases were identified in the cohort and 9 from the literature. Among them, 27 met the inclusion criteria: 16 treated with maraviroc and 11 with standard of care (including corticosteroids use). Most cases were related to MS (92.6%) and natalizumab (88%). Inflammatory features (iPML) were present at onset in 12 patients (44.4%), and most patients (92.6%) received corticosteroids within the course of PML. Aggravation due to PML-IRIS was not prevented by maraviroc compared with patients who received only corticosteroids (adjusted odds ratio: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.06-2.63). Similarly, maraviroc did not influence time to clinical worsening due to PML-IRIS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.529, 95% CI: 0.14-2.0) or disability at the last follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 2, 95% CI: 0.23-17.3). DISCUSSION: The use of CCR5 blockade did not help to keep deleterious immune reconstitution in check even when associated with corticosteroids. Despite maraviroc's reassuring safety profile, this study does not support its use in iPML/PML-IRIS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence showing that adding maraviroc to the management of iatrogenic iPML/PML-IRIS does not improve the outcome.


Subject(s)
CCR5 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/drug therapy , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/prevention & control , Maraviroc/pharmacology , Adult , CCR5 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/chemically induced , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/chemically induced , Male , Maraviroc/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0239452, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32956419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has reduced HIV-related morbidity and mortality at all stages of infection and reduced transmission of HIV. Currently, the immediate start of HAART is recommended for all HIV patients, regardless of the CD4 count. There are several concerns, however, about starting treatment in critically ill patients. Unpredictable absorption of medication by the gastrointestinal tract, drug toxicity, drug interactions, limited reserve to tolerate the dysfunction of other organs resulting from hypersensitivity to drugs or immune reconstitution syndrome, and the possibility that subtherapeutic levels of drug may lead to viral resistance are the main concerns. The objective of our study was to compare the early onset (up to 5 days) with late onset (after discharge from the ICU) of HAART in HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label clinical trial enrolling HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU of a public hospital in southern Brazil. Patients randomized to the intervention group had to start treatment with HAART within 5 days of ICU admission. For patients in the control group, treatment should begin after discharge from the ICU. The patients were followed up to determine mortality in the ICU, in the hospital and at 6 months. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was mortality at 6 months. RESULTS: The calculated sample size was 344 patients. Unfortunately, we decided to discontinue the study due to a progressively slower recruitment rate. A total of 115 patients were randomized. The majority of admissions were for AIDS-defining illnesses and low CD4. The main cause of admission was respiratory failure. Regarding the early and late study groups, there was no difference in hospital (66.7% and 63.8%, p = 0.75) or 6-month (68.4% and 79.2%, p = 0.20) mortality. After multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were shock and dialysis during the ICU stay. For the mortality outcome at 6 months, the independent variables were shock and dialysis during the ICU stay and tuberculosis at ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Although the early termination of the study precludes definitive conclusions being made, early HAART administration for HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU compared to late administration did not show benefit in hospital mortality or 6-month mortality. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01455688. Registered 20 October 2011, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01455688.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Critical Care/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/etiology , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , Brazil , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Critical Illness , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/etiology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
3.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 33(3): 267-272, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332225

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Central nervous system (CNS) infections associated with HIV remain significant contributors to morbidity and mortality, particularly among people living with HIV (PLWH) in resource-limited settings worldwide. In this review, we discuss several recent important scientific discoveries in the prevention, diagnosis, and management around two of the major causes of CNS opportunistic infections-tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and cryptococcal meningitis including immune reconstitution syndrome (IRIS) associated with cryptococcal meningitis. We also discuss the CNS as a possible viral reservoir, highlighting Cerebrospinal fluid viral escape. RECENT FINDINGS: CNS infections in HIV-positive people in sub-Saharan Africa contribute to 15-25% of AIDS-related deaths. Morbidity and mortality in those is associated with delays in HIV diagnosis, lack of availability for antimicrobial treatment, and risk of CNS IRIS. The CNS may serve as a reservoir for replication, though it is unclear whether this can impact peripheral immunosuppression. SUMMARY: Significant diagnostic and treatment advances for TBM and cryptococcal meningitis have yet to impact overall morbidity and mortality according to recent data. Lack of early diagnosis and treatment initiation, and also maintenance on combined antiretroviral treatment are the main drivers of the ongoing burden of CNS opportunistic infections. The CNS as a viral reservoir has major potential implications for HIV eradication strategies, and also control of CNS opportunistic infections.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/complications , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/diagnosis , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/diagnosis , Central Nervous System Infections/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/prevention & control , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/prevention & control , Viruses
4.
N Engl J Med ; 379(20): 1915-1925, 2018 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30428290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who have tuberculosis reduces mortality among patients with low CD4 counts, but it increases the risk of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). METHODS: We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether prophylactic prednisone can safely reduce the incidence of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated IRIS in patients at high risk for the syndrome. We enrolled HIV-infected patients who were initiating ART (and had not previously received ART), had started tuberculosis treatment within 30 days before initiating ART, and had a CD4 count of 100 cells or fewer per microliter. Patients received either prednisone (at a dose of 40 mg per day for 14 days, then 20 mg per day for 14 days) or placebo. The primary end point was the development of tuberculosis-associated IRIS within 12 weeks after initiating ART, as adjudicated by an independent committee. RESULTS: Among the 240 patients who were enrolled, the median age was 36 (interquartile range, 30 to 42), 60% were men, and 73% had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis; the median CD4 count was 49 cells per microliter (interquartile range, 24 to 86), and the median HIV type 1 RNA viral load was 5.5 log10 copies per milliliter (interquartile range, 5.2 to 5.9). A total of 120 patients were assigned to each group, and 18 patients were lost to follow-up or withdrew. Tuberculosis-associated IRIS was diagnosed in 39 patients (32.5%) in the prednisone group and in 56 (46.7%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.96; P=0.03). Open-label glucocorticoids were prescribed to treat tuberculosis-associated IRIS in 16 patients (13.3%) in the prednisone group and in 34 (28.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.81). There were five deaths in the prednisone group and four in the placebo group (P=1.00). Severe infections (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining illnesses or invasive bacterial infections) occurred in 11 patients in the prednisone group and in 18 patients in the placebo group (P=0.23). One case of Kaposi's sarcoma occurred in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisone treatment during the first 4 weeks after the initiation of ART for HIV infection resulted in a lower incidence of tuberculosis-associated IRIS than placebo, without evidence of an increased risk of severe infections or cancers. (Funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and others; PredART ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924286 .).


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Retroviral Agents/adverse effects , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/complications , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Double-Blind Method , Female , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/etiology , Male , Prednisone/adverse effects , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy
5.
AIDS Rev ; 20(1): 3-13, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29369304

ABSTRACT

Advanced HIV disease, defined as a CD4 cell count below 200 cells/µl or the presence of an AIDS-defining illness, remains common among HIV-infected individuals who first present for medical care. In developed countries, nearly 30% of new HIV diagnoses occurred at advanced stages of the disease, and it is important because advanced HIV disease has been associated with worse clinical outcomes, including lower rates of virological response, higher morbidity, and higher mortality. However, there are scarce data regarding which is the best antiretroviral regimen in these patients. Nowadays, integrase inhibitor-based regimens are widely recommended as the best initial therapy for treatment-naïve HIV-infected patients by all international guidelines. However, these guidelines hardly mention the recommended regimens in individuals with advanced HIV disease. Otherwise, recent data indicating a higher risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated to the use of integrase inhibitors have raised concerns on the use of these drugs in patients with advanced HIV disease. The aim of this article is to review the available evidence from randomized clinical trials for the best treatment in patients with advanced HIV disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/etiology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Male
6.
Ann Neurol ; 82(5): 697-705, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023856

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the effect of plasma exchange (PLEX; yes = PLEX+ , no = PLEX- ) and steroids administration timing (prophylactically [proST] or therapeutically [therST]) on the longitudinal clinical course of patients with natalizumab-related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and full-blown immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (PML-IRIS). METHODS: Clinical and radiological data of 42 Italian patients with PML were analyzed. Patient's data are available until 12 months after PML diagnosis. PLEX and steroids treatment as time-dependent covariates were entered in: (1) a Cox model to investigate their impact on full-blown PML-IRIS latency; (2) an analysis of variance ANOVA to investigate their impact on IRIS duration; and (3) a linear mixed model to assess their impact on the longitudinal clinical course (measured by means of Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). RESULTS: Treatment with PLEX was not associated to PML-IRIS latency (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05; p = 0.92), but once IRIS emerged, its duration was significantly longer in patients who underwent PLEX (101 vs 54 days in PLEX+ and PLEX- patients; p = 0.028). Receiving proST versus therST was not associated to IRIS latency (HR = 0.67; p = 0.39) or duration (p = 0.95). Patients who underwent proST had a significantly higher EDSS increase during PML (0.09 EDSS points per month; p = 0.04) as compared to those who had therST. INTERPRETATION: This study highlights that: (1) caution on the use of PLEX should be considered as the current data do not support a beneficial effect of PLEX and (2) caution on the early use of steroids is suggested because their prophylactic use to prevent full-blown PML-IRIS seems to negatively impact on the longitudinal disability course. Ann Neurol 2017;82:697-705.


Subject(s)
Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/therapy , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/drug therapy , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/therapy , Plasma Exchange/adverse effects , Steroids/adverse effects , Adult , Databases, Factual , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/complications , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/complications , Male , Retrospective Studies , Steroids/therapeutic use , Young Adult
7.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 34(8): 517-23, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27056581

ABSTRACT

Opportunistic infections continue to be a cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. They often arise because of severe immunosuppression resulting from poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, failure of antiretroviral therapy, or unawareness of HIV infection by patients whose first clinical manifestation of AIDS is an opportunistic infection. The present article is an executive summary of the document that updates the previous recommendations on the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients, namely, infections by parasites, fungi, viruses, mycobacteria, and bacteria, as well as imported infections. The article also addresses immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This document is intended for all professionals who work in clinical practice in the field of HIV infection.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/prevention & control , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/diagnosis , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/prevention & control , Parasitic Diseases/drug therapy , Parasitic Diseases/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , Virus Diseases/prevention & control
8.
Oral Dis ; 22 Suppl 1: 46-52, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27109272

ABSTRACT

The symbiotic association of tuberculosis (TB) and HIV poses a challenge to human survival. HIV complicates every aspect of TB including presentation, diagnosis and treatment. HIV-TB patients encounter unique problems like drug-drug interactions, cumulative toxicity, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), lower plasma drug levels and emergence of drug resistance during treatment despite adherence. TB may also be overdiagnosed in HIV due to a number of diseases that closely resemble TB. Notable among them are non-tuberculous mycobacteria, Pneumocystis Jirovecii and Nocardia. Even though diagnostic procedures have improved over the years, patients in developing countries usually seek health care at later stage of the disease. Research data ascertains the duration of therapy for TB to be 6 months with rifampicin and isoniazid, reinforced with ethambutol and pyrazinamide in the first 2 months. The schedule of therapy is still debatable with daily regimens being preferred in the context of HIV. Many reasons exist for persistence of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (M.TB) in sputum, or delayed-clearance of TB from sputum smears in HIV, apart from emergence of drug resistance and non-compliance. Acquired rifampicin resistance (ARR) is a unique phenomenon complicating HIV-associated TB when an intermittent regimen of antituberculosis therapy (ATT) is used without timely initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), especially in patients harbouring isoniazid-resistant strains Immune restoration is often incomplete ('swiss cheese' pattern) even with effective HAART if not started early. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is the paradoxical worsening of the patient's condition often with radiological deterioration, due to an enhanced immune response with HAART. IRIS occurs despite an effective virological suppression and a favourable response to ATT. The incidence of IRIS in HIV has reached up to 54%, requiring utilization of experts and tertiary care which forms an obstacle to the decentralization of patients in the ART programme. Research in HIV-TB immunology and management needs further exploration in order to understand the diseases and offer appropriate treatment. The following paragraphs provide scientific evidences generated through research that could potentially guide management.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Coinfection/drug therapy , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/microbiology , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Coinfection/diagnosis , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/diagnosis , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnosis
9.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 34(8): 516.e1-516.e18, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26976381

ABSTRACT

Despite the huge advance that antiretroviral therapy represents for the prognosis of infection by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), opportunistic infections (OIs) continue to be a cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. OIs often arise because of severe immunosuppression resulting from poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy, failure of antiretroviral therapy, or unawareness of HIV infection by patients whose first clinical manifestation of AIDS is an OI. The present article updates our previous guidelines on the prevention and treatment of various OIs in HIV-infected patients, namely, infections by parasites, fungi, viruses, mycobacteria, and bacteria, as well as imported infections. The article also addresses immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Coinfection , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Mycobacterium Infections/drug therapy , Mycobacterium Infections/prevention & control , Mycoses/drug therapy , Mycoses/prevention & control , Opportunistic Infections/etiology , Parasitic Diseases/drug therapy , Parasitic Diseases/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/drug therapy , Virus Diseases/prevention & control
10.
HIV Med ; 17(2): 83-8, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26548563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The European AIDS Clinical Society (EACS) guidelines are intended for all clinicians involved in the care of HIV-positive persons, and are available in print, online, and as a free App for download for iPhone and Android. GUIDELINE HIGHLIGHTS: The 2015 version of the EACS guidelines contains major revisions in all sections; antiretroviral treatment (ART), comorbidities, coinfections and opportunistic diseases. Among the key revisions is the recommendation of ART for all HIV-positive persons, irrespectively of CD4 count, based on the Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) study results. The recommendations for the preferred and the alternative ART options have also been revised, and a new section on the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been added. A number of new antiretroviral drugs/drug combinations have been added to the updated tables on drug-drug interactions, adverse drug effects, dose adjustment for renal/liver insufficiency and for ART administration in persons with swallowing difficulties. The revisions of the coinfection section reflect the major advances in anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with direct-acting antivirals with earlier start of treatment in individuals at increased risk of liver disease progression, and a phasing out of interferon-containing treatment regimens. The section on opportunistic diseases has been restructured according to individual pathogens/diseases and a new overview table has been added on CD4 count thresholds for different primary prophylaxes. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis and management of HIV infection and related coinfections, opportunistic diseases and comorbidities continue to require a multidisciplinary effort for which the 2015 version of the EACS guidelines provides an easily accessable and updated overview.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Standard of Care , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Adult , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Comorbidity , Drug Interactions , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Guidelines as Topic , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Male , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Societies, Medical , Viral Load
12.
Intern Med ; 54(7): 847-51, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25832955

ABSTRACT

A 64-year-old neurologically asymptomatic woman with rheumatoid arthritis who was treated with the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist adalimumab developed disseminated tuberculosis (TB). After receiving anti-TB therapy and discontinuing adalimumab, she exhibited paradoxical worsening due to immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) with the appearance of meningitis and brain tuberculomas. This case indicates that continuing anti-TNF therapy may be necessary to prevent IRIS in patients who develop TB, particularly disseminated TB, during the course of anti-TNF therapy. In addition, careful screening for central nervous system (CNS) TB should be performed prior to the initiation of therapy, as even neurologically asymptomatic patients can develop CNS manifestations of IRIS.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Tuberculoma, Intracranial/prevention & control , Tuberculosis, Meningeal/prevention & control , Adalimumab , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tuberculosis, Miliary/drug therapy
13.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 27(6): 501-5, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25211360

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent findings in the management of active tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. RECENT FINDINGS: Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes substantial morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. According to the literature, transplantation might not be an absolute contraindication for patients with active TB. Although the use of rifampin, resulting in the decreased levels of calcineurin inhibitors, might lead to rejection, studies showed that rifampin-based regimens did not appear to be associated with post-TB rejection or mortality. Nevertheless, judicious adjustment and close monitoring of immunosuppressant levels during concurrent rifampin use for patients with active TB are needed. TB-associated immune reconstitution syndrome occurred in 14% of SOT recipients; liver transplantation, cytomegalovirus infection, and rifampin use are identified risk factors for the development of immune reconstitution syndrome. SUMMARY: Patients with active TB might be able to undergo transplantation if indicated. Rifampin-based regimen can be considered in the treatment of TB in SOT recipients. In addition to HIV-positive patients, immune reconstitution syndrome also occurs in SOT recipients, and deserves the recognition by primary care physicians to avoid unnecessary management.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/immunology , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Tuberculosis/immunology , Chemoprevention , Contraindications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/immunology , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/etiology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/mortality , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Transplant Recipients , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/drug therapy
14.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep ; 11(3): 223-32, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950732

ABSTRACT

An immune reconstitution disorder occurs in up to 40 % of severely immunodeficient HIV patients who commence antiretroviral therapy (ART), with an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) being encountered most commonly. Differences in the immunopathogenesis of an IRIS associated with different types of pathogen have become apparent but common features have also been defined. These include severe immunodeficiency prior to commencing ART associated with a high pathogen load and 'compensatory' immune responses, particularly innate immune responses, which inadequately control the pathogen and increase the risk of immunopathology as the immune system recovers on ART. Prevention of an IRIS may be achieved by optimising therapy for opportunistic infections before ART is commenced, delaying ART or using immunomodulatory therapy to prevent or suppress the immune response that causes the immunopathology. However, further clinical studies are required to examine these options in a systematic manner for the various types of IRIS.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/therapy , Autoimmune Diseases , Cryptococcosis/complications , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/etiology , Tuberculosis/complications
15.
J Immunol Res ; 2014: 631951, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24864269

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and delayed immune reconstitution (IR) remain serious obstacles for successful haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT). CMV-specific IR varied according to whether patients received manipulated/unmanipulated grafts or myeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning. CMV infection commonly occurs following impaired IR of T cell and its subsets. Here, we discuss the factors that influence IR based on currently available evidence. Adoptive transfer of donor T cells to improve CMV-specific IR is discussed. One should choose grafts from CMV-positive donors for transplant into CMV-positive recipients (D+/R+) because this will result in better IR than would grafts from CMV-negative donors (D-/R+). Stem cell source and donor age are other important factors. Posttransplant complications, including graft-versus-host disease and CMV infection, as well as their associated treatments, should also be considered. The effects of varying degrees of HLA disparity and conditioning regimens are more controversial. As many of these factors and strategies are considered in the setting of haplo-SCT, it is anticipated that haplo-SCT will continue to advance, further expanding our understanding of IR and CMV infection.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Stem Cell Transplantation , T-Lymphocytes/transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning , Adoptive Transfer , Cytomegalovirus/immunology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/pathology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/immunology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Hematologic Neoplasms/virology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/immunology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/pathology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/virology , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(9): 1308-11, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585567

ABSTRACT

In May 2013, a revised and updated version of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institutes of Health/HIV Medicine Association Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents was released online. These guidelines, since their inception in 1989, have been widely accessed in the United States and abroad. These guidelines have focused on the management of HIV/AIDS-related opportunistic infections that occur in the United States. In other parts of the world, the spectrum of complications may be different and the resources available for diagnosis and management may not be identical to those in the United States. The sections that have been most extensively updated are those on immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human papillomavirus, and immunizations. The guidelines will not be published in hard copy form. This document will be revised as needed throughout each year as new data become available.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/complications , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/complications , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/complications , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/drug therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , United States
17.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 3(5): 659-61, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265277

ABSTRACT

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with natalizumab have a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate; in these patients, a relapse is uncommon but not unexpected. In contrast, the appearance of a severe exacerbation is striking and requires the differential diagnosis with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Here, we describe a case of a 22-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting MS who developed an unexpected response after the patient׳s fifth natalizumab infusion with an aggressive radiological and clinical evolution. Changing the patient׳s treatment to fingolimod resulted in the absence of new clinical relapses and the absence of active lesions on brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) during the first 12 months of follow-up. We hypothesize that the appearance of natalizumab antibodies in this patient triggered lymphocyte migration to the central nervous system in a rebound phenomenon; this is similar to what occurs during immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after removal of natalizumab.


Subject(s)
Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/chemically induced , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/complications , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Natalizumab/administration & dosage , Natalizumab/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(9): 1331-8, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23946220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with increased systemic inflammation and immune activation that persist despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART). Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a common coinfection that may contribute to this inflammation. METHODS: Sixty HIV type 1 (HIV-1)/HSV-2-coinfected adults on suppressive ART were randomized 1:1:1 to 12 weeks of placebo, low-dose valacyclovir (500 mg twice daily), or high-dose valacyclovir (1 g twice daily) in this 18-week trial. Co-primary outcome measures were the percentage of activated (CD38(+)HLA-DR(+)) CD8 T cells in blood, and highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in plasma. Secondary outcomes included additional immune, inflammatory cytokine, and endothelial activation markers. The impact of valacyclovir (both groups combined) on each outcome was estimated using treatment × time interaction terms in generalized estimating equation regression models. RESULTS: Participants were mostly white (75%) men who have sex with men (80%). Median age was 51 (interquartile range [IQR], 47-56) years, median duration of HIV infection was 15 (IQR, 8-21) years, median CD4 count at enrollment was 520 (IQR, 392-719) cells/µL, and median nadir CD4 count was 142 (IQR, 42-240) cells/µL. Valacyclovir was not associated with significant changes in any primary or secondary immunological outcomes in bivariate or multivariable models. Medication adherence was 97% by self-report, 96% by pill count, and 84% by urine monitoring. Eight patients had adverse events deemed possibly related to the study drug (5 placebo, 1 low-dose, 2 high-dose), and 6 patients reported at least 1 HSV outbreak (3 placebo, 3 low-dose, 0 high-dose). CONCLUSIONS: Valacyclovir did not decrease systemic immune activation or inflammatory biomarkers in HIV-1/HSV-2-coinfected adults on suppressive ART. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01176409.


Subject(s)
Acyclovir/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coinfection/drug therapy , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Herpes Genitalis/drug therapy , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Acyclovir/therapeutic use , Adult , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Coinfection/virology , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Herpes Genitalis/complications , Herpes Genitalis/virology , Herpesvirus 2, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Valacyclovir , Valine/therapeutic use
20.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 26(1): 26-34, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23242412

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The epidemiology and pathogenesis of, and risk factors for, cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (CM-IRIS) are reviewed with an emphasis on how new insights inform a rational management approach and prevention strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Risk factors for paradoxical CM-IRIS are a low inflammatory response and CD4 cell count at baseline, rapid immune restoration from this low baseline, and a high organism or antigen load at baseline and at antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Detailed immune mechanisms are still unclear. Rapidly fungicidal induction therapy, allowing prompt initiation of ART (from around 3 weeks in resource-limited settings in the context of amphotericin B induction) at a time when organism and antigen loads are low, may reduce overall mortality without exacerbating paradoxical CM-IRIS, compared with initiation of ART at later time points. Recent cohorts suggest early recognition and management can reduce the mortality associated with paradoxical CM-IRIS. Unmasking CM-IRIS is preventable through screening for cryptococcal antigen prior to ART and preemptive antifungal treatment for those testing positive, although prospective studies are needed. SUMMARY: Optimal antifungal induction and judicious ART timing, together with early recognition and management of developing cases, with thorough exclusion of alternative diagnoses, should help reduce paradoxical CM-IRIS-related mortality. Unmasking CM-IRIS cases should be preventable.


Subject(s)
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/drug therapy , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/drug therapy , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/immunology , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/immunology , Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome/prevention & control , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/diagnosis , Meningitis, Cryptococcal/prevention & control , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...