Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.346
Filter
1.
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 23(2): 158-167, 2024 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822511

ABSTRACT

Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are among the high-risk groups regarding COVID-19. Receiving booster doses (third and fourth) in addition to the standard doses is recommended in these patients. This study investigated the antibody response before and after a booster dose of Sinopharm vaccine in IEI patients.  Thirty patients (>12 years) with antibody deficiencies, referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital and Children's Medical Center in Tehran, were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. All patients were fully vaccinated with the BBIBP-CorV vaccine (2 doses of Sinopharm). Initial measurements of anti-receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) IgG antibody responses were conducted by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Subsequently, all patients received a booster dose of the vaccine. Four to six weeks after booster injection, the levels of antibodies were re-evaluated.  Twenty patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 7 cases with agammaglobulinemia and 3 patients with hyper IgM syndrome were studied. Anti-RBD IgG and anti-N IgG antibodies increased in all patients after the booster. Our results indicated the need of receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with antibody deficiencies, even for enhancing humoral immune response specially in patients with CVID.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Adult , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Iran , Prospective Studies , Antibody Formation/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Child , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(21): e174, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend vaccination for individuals who have recovered from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to prevent reinfection, comprehensive evaluation studies are limited. We aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection according to the primary vaccination status, booster vaccination status, and vaccination methods used. METHODS: This population-based case-control study enrolled all SARS-CoV-2-infected patients in Seoul between January 2020 and February 2022. Individuals were categorized into case (reinfection) and control (no reinfection) groups. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression after adjusting for underlying comorbidities using multiple regression. RESULTS: The case group included 7,678 participants (average age: 32.26 years). In all vaccinated individuals, patients who received the first and second booster doses showed reduced reinfection rates compared with individuals who received basic vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 0.605, P < 0.001 and OR = 0.002, P < 0.001). Patients who received BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, NVX-CoV2373 and heterologous vaccination showed reduced reinfection rates compared with unvaccinated individuals (OR = 0.546, P < 0.001; OR = 0.356, P < 0.001; and OR = 0.472, P < 0.001). However, the ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination group showed a higher reinfection rate than the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination group (OR = 4.419, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, completion of the basic vaccination series showed significant protection against reinfection compared with no vaccination. If the first or second booster vaccination was received, the protective effect against reinfection was higher than that of basic vaccination; when vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 only or heterologous vaccination, the protective effect was higher than that of ChAdOx1-S or Ad26.COV2.S vaccination only.


Subject(s)
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Reinfection , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccine Efficacy , Humans , Male , Female , Case-Control Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Reinfection/prevention & control , Reinfection/immunology , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Young Adult , Vaccination , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Aged
3.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29640, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699969

ABSTRACT

After the termination of zero-COVID-19 policy, the populace in China has experienced both Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. Considering the poor antibody responses and severe outcomes observed among the elderly following infection, we conducted a longitudinal investigation to examine the epidemiological characteristics and antibody kinetics among 107 boosted elderly participants following the Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. We observed that 96 participants (89.7%) were infected with Omicron BA.5, while 59 (55.1%) participants were infected with Omicron XBB. Notably, 52 participants (48.6%) experienced dual infections of both Omicron BA.5 and XBB. The proportion of symptomatic cases appeared to decrease following the XBB wave (18.6%) compared to that after the BA.5 wave (59.3%). Omicron BA.5 breakthrough infection induced lower neutralizing antibody titers against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1, while reinfection with Omicron XBB broadened the antibody responses against all measured Omicron subvariants and may alleviate the wild type-vaccination induced immune imprinting. Boosted vaccination type and comorbidities were the significant factors associated with antibody responses. Updated vaccines based on emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants are needed to control the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in the elderly.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Male , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Vaccination
4.
Cell Host Microbe ; 32(5): 632-634, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723601

ABSTRACT

Inducing HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) through vaccination poses exceptional challenges. In this issue of Cell Host & Microbe, Wiehe and colleagues report the elicitation of affinity-matured bnAbs in knock-in mice through boosting immunogen vaccination, which selects for key improbable mutations.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , Antibodies, Neutralizing , HIV Antibodies , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Vaccine Development , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/genetics , HIV-1/immunology , HIV-1/genetics , Animals , Mice , HIV Antibodies/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/immunology , Humans , Gene Knock-In Techniques , Immunization, Secondary , Vaccination
5.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 15: 21501319241251941, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708693

ABSTRACT

In this era in which the vast majority of the global population have developed COVID-19 infection and/or got vaccinated against it, identification of the late disorders as the vaccines' side effect or long-COVID manifestation seems essential. This study included the vaccinated individuals of 4 different vaccine regimens including inactivated virus-based, subunit protein, and adenovirus-based vaccines in a follow-up schedule 6-month post the booster shot. All the documented vaccine adverse events were thoroughly assessed considering the cases' medical history by Adverse Events Committee of Pasteur Institute of Iran. Totally 329 individuals who got 3 doses of vaccination were followed 6 months after the booster shots among whom 41 (12.4%) cases with the mean age of 40.9 ± 10.48 years had a type of disorder. Gynecological and osteoarticular involvements were the most common recorded disorders of which 73.1% were possibly linked to vaccination outcomes and the rest were affected by both long-COVID-19 and vaccination. Notably, the average time of symptoms persistence was 155 ± 10.4 days. This study has the advantage of long-term follow-up which presents various forms of late events in each episode of COVID-19 infection and vaccination. About 26.8% of people with persistent complications suffered from both long-COVOD/ vaccination in whom the differentiation between the vaccine side effect and long-COVID manifestation was quite challenging. Long-term follow-up studies in large population seems essential to outline the role of long-COVID and vaccination regarding persistent complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Immunization, Secondary , Iran/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
6.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13290, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Priming with ChAdOx1 followed by heterologous boosting is considered in several countries. Nevertheless, analyses comparing the immunogenicity of heterologous booster to homologous primary vaccination regimens and natural infection are lacking. In this study, we aimed to conduct a comparative assessment of the immunogenicity between homologous primary vaccination regimens and heterologous prime-boost vaccination using BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. METHODS: We matched vaccinated naïve (VN) individuals (n = 673) with partial vaccination (n = 64), primary vaccination (n = 590), and primary series plus mRNA vaccine heterologous booster (n = 19) with unvaccinated naturally infected (NI) individuals with a documented primary SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 206). We measured the levels of neutralizing total antibodies (NTAbs), total antibodies (TAbs), anti-S-RBD IgG, and anti-S1 IgA titers. RESULTS: Homologous primary vaccination with ChAdOx1 not only showed less potent NTAb, TAb, anti-S-RBD IgG, and anti-S1 IgA immune responses compared to primary BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination regimens (p < 0.05) but also showed ~3-fold less anti-S1 IgA response compared to infection-induced immunity (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, a heterologous booster led to an increase of ~12 times in the immune response when compared to two consecutive homologous ChAdOx1 immunizations. Furthermore, correlation analyses revealed that both anti-S-RBD IgG and anti-S1 IgA significantly contributed to virus neutralization among NI individuals, particularly in symptomatic and pauci-symptomatic individuals, whereas among VN individuals, anti-S-RBD IgG was the main contributor to virus neutralization. CONCLUSION: The results emphasize the potential benefit of using heterologous mRNA boosters to increase antibody levels and neutralizing capacity particularly in patients who received primary vaccination with ChAdOx1.


Subject(s)
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Male , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Female , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adult , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin A/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Vaccination , Aged , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Antibody Formation/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administration & dosage , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
7.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154: 3732, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749028

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With the emergence of newer SARS-CoV-2 variants and their substantial effects on the levels and duration of protection against infection, an understanding of these characteristics of the protection conferred by humoral and cellular immunity can aid in the proper development and implementation of vaccine and safety guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a rapid literature review and searched five electronic databases weekly from 1 November 2021 to 30 September 2022. Studies that assessed the humoral or cellular immunity conferred by infection, vaccination or a hybrid (combination of both) in adults and risk groups (immunocompromised and older populations) were identified. Studies were eligible when they reported data on immunological assays of COVID-19 (related to vaccination and/or infection) or the effectiveness of protection (related to the effectiveness of vaccination and/or infection). RESULTS: We screened 5103 studies and included 205 studies, of which 70 provided data on the duration of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The duration of protection of adaptive immunity was greatly impacted by Omicron and its subvariants: levels of protection were low by 3-6 months from exposure to infection/vaccination. Although more durable, cellular immunity also showed signs of waning by 6 months. First and second mRNA vaccine booster doses increased the levels of protection against infection and severe disease from Omicron and its subvariants but continued to demonstrate a high degree of waning over time. CONCLUSION: All humoral immunities (infection-acquired, vaccine-acquired and hybrid) waned by 3-6 months. Cellular immunity was more durable but showed signs of waning by 6 months. Hybrid immunity had the highest magnitude of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Boosting may be recommended as early as 3-4 months after the last dose, especially in risk groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunity, Cellular , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Immunization, Secondary , Vaccination
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2352909, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752802

ABSTRACT

Thailand has incorporated the whole-cell (wP) pertussis vaccine into the expanded program on immunization since 1977 and has offered the acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine as an optional vaccine for infants since 2001. We followed healthy children from a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02408926) in which children were randomly assigned to receive either pentavalent (DTwP-HB-Hib) or hexavalent (DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib) vaccines for their primary series (administered at 2, 4, and 6 months) and first booster vaccination (18 months). Both groups received Tdap-IPV as a second booster at the age of 4 y. Blood samples were collected for evaluation of antibody persistence to diphtheria toxoid (DT), tetanus toxoid (TT), and Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) between 2 and 6 y of age annually, and for the immunogenicity study of Tdap-IPV at 1 month after the second booster. Antibody persistence to Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) was followed until 3 y of age. A total of 105 hexavalent-vaccinated children and 91 pentavalent-vaccinated children completed this study. Both pentavalent and hexavalent groups demonstrated increased antibody levels against DT, TT, and B. pertussis antigens following the second booster with Tdap-IPV. All children achieved a seroprotective concentration for anti-DT and anti-TT IgG at 1 month post booster. The hexavalent group possessed significantly higher anti-pertactin IgG (adjusted p = .023), whereas the pentavalent group possessed significantly higher anti-pertussis toxin IgG (adjusted p < .001) after the second booster. Despite declining levels post-second booster, a greater number of children sustained protective levels of anti-DT and anti-TT IgG compared to those after the first booster.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial , Bordetella pertussis , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Haemophilus Vaccines , Haemophilus influenzae type b , Immunization, Secondary , Vaccines, Combined , Whooping Cough , Humans , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Haemophilus Vaccines/immunology , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Infant , Female , Male , Vaccines, Combined/immunology , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Bordetella pertussis/immunology , Haemophilus influenzae type b/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/immunology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/immunology , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Thailand , Tetanus Toxoid/immunology , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria Toxoid/immunology , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/immunology , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria/immunology , Haemophilus Infections/prevention & control , Haemophilus Infections/immunology
9.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303394, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) may be unengaged with healthcare services and face an elevated risk of severe morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 due to chronic diseases and structural inequities. However, data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, particularly booster vaccination, among PWID are limited. We examined COVID-19 vaccine uptake and factors associated with booster vaccination among PWID in New York City (NYC). METHODS: We recruited PWID using respondent-driven sampling from October 2021 to November 2023 in a survey that included HIV and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies testing. The questionnaire included demographics, COVID-19 vaccination and attitudes, and drug use behaviors. RESULTS: Of 436 PWID, 80% received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Among individuals who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, 95% were fully vaccinated. After excluding participants recruited before booster authorization for general adults started in NYC, and those who had never received an initial vaccination, 41% reported having received a COVID-19 booster vaccine dose. COVID-19 booster vaccination was significantly associated with having a high school diploma or GED (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09, 3.48), ever received the hepatitis A/B vaccine (aOR 2.23; 95% CI 1.27, 3.96), main drug use other than heroin/speedball, fentanyl and stimulants (aOR 14.4; 95% CI 2.32, 280), number of non-fatal overdoses (aOR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16, 0.70), and mean vaccination attitude score (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: We found a suboptimal level of COVID-19 booster vaccination among PWID, which was consistent with the rates observed in the general population in NYC and the U.S. Community-based interventions are needed to improve COVID-19 booster vaccination access and uptake among PWID. Attitudes towards vaccination were significant predictors of both primary and booster vaccination uptake. Outreach efforts focusing on improving attitudes towards vaccination and educational programs are essential for reducing hesitancy and increasing booster vaccination uptake among PWID.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , New York City , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Drug Users/psychology , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11059, 2024 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744908

ABSTRACT

Measles is a major public health problem in under-five children, leading to lifelong complications. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the magnitude of measles second-dose vaccine uptake and its determinants among children aged 24-35 months in Northwest Ethiopia. A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 418 children aged 24-35 months in Northwest Ethiopia between January 2022 and February 2022. A simple random sampling technique was used to access study subjects. A binary logistic regression model was employed. An adjusted odd ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a p-value < 0.05 was used to declare significant predictors of measles second dose vaccine uptake. The magnitude of the measles second dose vaccine uptake among children aged 24-35 months was 41.39%. Postnatal care visits (AOR: 4.78, CI 1.49, 15.34), child vaccination status of other scheduled vaccines (AOR: 3.88, CI 2.23, 6.73), awareness of the measles second dose vaccine and its schedule (AOR: 8.924, CI 5.27, 15.09), and distance from the vaccination center (AOR: 0.21, CI 0.06, 0.77) were significantly associated with measles second dose vaccine uptake. The uptake of measles second dose vaccine in the study area was low. Therefore, health workers and other partners should initiate awareness creation programs for mothers/caretaker to improve the uptake of measles second dose vaccine.


Subject(s)
Measles Vaccine , Measles , Vaccination , Humans , Ethiopia , Female , Male , Measles Vaccine/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Schedule , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 624, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants may necessitate an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare workers' (HCWs) acceptance of a COVID-19 yearly booster vaccine if recommended and its association with their attitudes and burnout levels. METHODS: We used an online self-administered questionnaire to conduct a cross-sectional study of all HCWs in the West Bank and Gaza Strip of Palestine between August and September 2022. We used the Vaccination Attitudes Examination scale to assess HCWs' vaccination attitudes and the Maslach Burnout Inventory to assess work-related Burnout. In addition, we conducted logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with the acceptance of the booster vaccine. RESULTS: The study included 919 HCWs; 52.4% were male, 46.5% were physicians, 30.0% were nurses, and 63.1% worked in hospitals. One-third of HCWs (95% CI: 30.5%-36.7%) said they would accept an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. HCWs who are suspicious of vaccine benefits [aOR = .70; 95%CI: .65-.75] and those concerned about unforeseeable future effects [aOR = .90; 95%CI: .84-.95] are less likely to accept the booster vaccine if recommended, whereas those who receive annual influenza vaccine are more likely to get it [aOR = 2.9; 95%CI: 1.7-5.0]. CONCLUSION: Only about a third of HCWs would agree to receive an annual COVID-19 booster vaccine if recommended. Mistrust of the vaccine's efficacy and concerns about side effects continue to drive COVID-19 vaccine reluctance. Health officials need to address HCWs' concerns to increase their acceptance of the annual vaccine if it is to be recommended.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Immunization, Secondary , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Adult , Middle East , Immunization, Secondary/psychology , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Burnout, Professional/psychology
12.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1392477, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774878

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Accumulating evidence indicates the importance of T cell immunity in vaccination-induced protection against severe COVID-19 disease, especially against SARS-CoV-2 Variants-of-Concern (VOCs) that more readily escape from recognition by neutralizing antibodies. However, there is limited knowledge on the T cell responses across different age groups and the impact of CMV status after primary and booster vaccination with different vaccine combinations. Moreover, it remains unclear whether age has an effect on the ability of T cells to cross-react against VOCs. Methods: Therefore, we interrogated the Spike-specific T cell responses in healthy adults of the Dutch population across different ages, whom received different vaccine types for the primary series and/or booster vaccination, using IFNÉ£ ELISpot. Cells were stimulated with overlapping peptide pools of the ancestral Spike protein and different VOCs. Results: Robust Spike-specific T cell responses were detected in the vast majority of participants upon the primary vaccination series, regardless of the vaccine type (i.e. BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or Ad26.COV2.S). Clearly, in the 70+ age group, responses were overall lower and showed more variation compared to younger age groups. Only in CMV-seropositive older adults (>70y) there was a significant inverse relation of age with T cell responses. Although T cell responses increased in all age groups after booster vaccination, Spike-specific T cell frequencies remained lower in the 70+ age group. Regardless of age or CMV status, primary mRNA-1273 vaccination followed by BNT162b2 booster vaccination showed limited booster effect compared to the BNT162b2/BNT162b2 or BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 primary-booster regimen. A modest reduction in cross-reactivity to the Alpha, Delta and Omicron BA.1, but not the Beta or Gamma variant, was observed after primary vaccination. Discussion: Together, this study shows that age, CMV status, but also the primary-booster vaccination regimen influence the height of the vaccination-induced Spike-specific T cell response, but did not impact the VOC cross-reactivity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Reactions , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , T-Lymphocytes , Humans , Cross Reactions/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Middle Aged , Adult , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Aged , Male , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Age Factors , Young Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Immunization, Secondary , Cytomegalovirus/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , Vaccination , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Aged, 80 and over
13.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 73(20): 460-466, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781111

ABSTRACT

Two doses of JYNNEOS vaccine are effective in preventing many mpox cases and can reduce the severity of symptoms in infected persons. However, infections among fully vaccinated persons can occur. During May 2022-May 2024, a total of 271 mpox cases among fully vaccinated persons were reported to CDC from 27 U.S. jurisdictions. These reported infections are estimated to have occurred in <1% of fully vaccinated persons. Compared with cases among unvaccinated persons, infections among fully vaccinated persons were more likely to occur among non-Hispanic White men aged 30-39 years, were associated with increased numbers of sexual partners, and resulted in less severe disease (p<0.001). Among infections in fully vaccinated persons with complete data, infections after vaccination were reported more commonly after receipt of heterologous (subcutaneous and intradermal) (46%) or homologous subcutaneous (32%) JYNNEOS vaccination than after homologous intradermal (22%) vaccination. Disparate time intervals from vaccination to infection among fully vaccinated persons suggest that immunity is not waning. The median interval between the second vaccine dose and illness onset was longer for cases among persons who had received 2 intradermal doses (median = 363 days; IQR = 221-444 days) compared with cases in persons who had received 2 subcutaneous doses (median = 263 days; IQR = 47-334 days) (p<0.001). The implications of this finding are not known; however, these data should increase confidence in the effectiveness of vaccine doses that were administered intradermally, the preferred method of administration during the peak of the outbreak when vaccine supply was limited. Persons recommended to receive the JYNNEOS vaccine should receive 2 doses, irrespective of the route of administration, and at this time, additional doses are not recommended for the affected population.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Young Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Adolescent , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/administration & dosage , Immunization, Secondary
14.
Med Microbiol Immunol ; 213(1): 7, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761268

ABSTRACT

The incidence of rabies in Thailand reached its peak in 2018 with 18 human deaths. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) vaccination is thus recommended for high-risk populations. WHO has recently recommended that patients who are exposed to a suspected rabid animal and have already been immunized against rabies should receive a 1-site intradermal (ID) injection of 0.1 mL on days 0 and 3 as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). In Thailand, village health and livestock volunteers tasked with annual dog vaccination typically receive only a single lifetime PrEP dose and subsequent boosters solely upon confirmed animal bites. However, the adequacy of a single PrEP dose for priming and maintaining immunity in this high-risk group has not been evaluated. Therefore, our study was designed to address two key questions: (1) sufficiency of single-dose PrEP-to determine whether a single ID PrEP dose provides adequate long-term immune protection for high-risk individuals exposed to numerous dogs during their vaccination duties. (2) Booster efficacy for immune maturation-to investigate whether one or two additional ID booster doses effectively stimulate a mature and sustained antibody response in this population. The level and persistence of the rabies antibody were determined by comparing the immunogenicity and booster efficacy among the vaccination groups. Our study demonstrated that rabies antibodies persisted for more than 180 days after cost-effective ID PrEP or the 1st or the 2nd single ID booster dose, and adequate antibody levels were detected in more than 95% of participants by CEE-cELISA and 100% by indirect ELISA. Moreover, the avidity maturation of rabies-specific antibodies occurred after the 1st single ID booster dose. This smaller ID booster regimen was sufficient for producing a sufficient immune response and enhancing the maturation of anti-rabies antibodies. This safe and effective PrEP regimen and a single visit involving a one-dose ID booster are recommended, and at least one one-dose ID booster regimen could be equitably implemented in at-risk people in Thailand and other developing countries. However, an adequate antibody level should be monitored before the booster is administered.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Immunization, Secondary , Rabies Vaccines , Rabies , Rabies Vaccines/immunology , Rabies Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rabies/prevention & control , Rabies/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Thailand , Humans , Injections, Intradermal , Animals , Female , Adult , Male , Young Adult , Antibody Affinity , Middle Aged , Dogs , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Adolescent , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Antibody Formation/immunology
15.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4224, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762522

ABSTRACT

Waning antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination combined with the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineage led to reduced vaccine effectiveness. As a countermeasure, bivalent mRNA-based booster vaccines encoding the ancestral spike protein in combination with that of Omicron BA.1 or BA.5 were introduced. Since then, different BA.2-descendent lineages have become dominant, such as XBB.1.5, JN.1, or EG.5.1. Here, we report post-hoc analyses of data from the SWITCH-ON study, assessing how different COVID-19 priming regimens affect the immunogenicity of bivalent booster vaccinations and breakthrough infections (NCT05471440). BA.1 and BA.5 bivalent vaccines boosted neutralizing antibodies and T-cells up to 3 months after boost; however, cross-neutralization of XBB.1.5 was poor. Interestingly, different combinations of prime-boost regimens induced divergent responses: participants primed with Ad26.COV2.S developed lower binding antibody levels after bivalent boost while neutralization and T-cell responses were similar to mRNA-based primed participants. In contrast, the breadth of neutralization was higher in mRNA-primed and bivalent BA.5 boosted participants. Combined, our data further support the current use of monovalent vaccines based on circulating strains when vaccinating risk groups, as recently recommended by the WHO. We emphasize the importance of the continuous assessment of immune responses targeting circulating variants to guide future COVID-19 vaccination policies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Vaccination
16.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 6(6): e339-e351, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734019

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies. METHODS: OCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3-7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4-63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related. INTERPRETATION: A third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose. FUNDING: Medical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunocompromised Host , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , Male , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Prospective Studies , Immunization, Secondary , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273/immunology , Adult , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , United Kingdom , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2350091, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757631

ABSTRACT

Although previous studies have shown no increased mortality risk after the primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, reports on booster doses are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate mortality risk after the mRNA vaccine boosters in addition to the primary series. This nested case-control study included two age-specific cohorts (18-64 and ≥65 years as of February 1, 2021) in two municipalities. All deaths were identified and matched five controls for each case at each date of death (index date) with risk set sampling according to municipality, age, and sex. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mRNA vaccines (first to fifth doses) were estimated by comparing with no vaccination within 21 and 42 days before the index date using a conditional logistic regression model. The 18-64-years cohort comprised 431 cases (mean age, 57.0 years; men, 58.2%) and 2,155 controls (mean age, 56.0; men, 58.2%), whereas the ≥65-years cohort comprised 12,166 cases (84.0; 50.2%) and 60,830 controls (84.0, 50.2%). The aORs (95% CI) in 0-21 days after the third and fourth doses in the 18-64-years cohort were 0.62 (0.24, 1.62) and 0.38 (0.08, 1.84), respectively. The aORs (95% CI) after the third to fifth doses in the ≥65 years cohort were 0.36 (0.31, 0.43), 0.30 (0.25, 0.37), and 0.26 (0.20, 0.33), respectively. In conclusion, booster doses of mRNA vaccines do not increase mortality risk. These findings could help subsequent vaccine campaigns and alleviate vaccine hesitancy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , mRNA Vaccines , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Young Adult , Japan/epidemiology , Adolescent , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/administration & dosage , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
18.
Nat Aging ; 4(5): 638-646, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724731

ABSTRACT

The uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccination among older adults in China is suboptimal. Here, we report the results of a parallel-group cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of promoting COVID-19 booster vaccination among grandparents (≥60 years) through a health education intervention delivered to their grandchildren (aged ≥16 years) in a Chinese cohort (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200063240 ). The primary outcome was the uptake rate of COVID-19 booster dose among grandparents. Secondary outcomes include grandparents' attitude and intention to get a COVID-19 booster dose. A total of 202 college students were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention arm of web-based health education and 14 daily reminders (n = 188 grandparents) or control arm (n = 187 grandparents) and reported their grandparents' COVID-19 booster vaccination status at baseline and 21 days. Grandparents in the intervention arm were more likely to receive COVID-19 booster vaccination compared to control cohort (intervention, 30.6%; control, 16.9%; risk ratio = 2.00 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.66)). Grandparents in the intervention arm also had greater attitude change (ß = 0.28 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.52)) and intention change (ß = 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.52)) to receive a COVID-19 booster dose. Our results show that an educational intervention targeting college students increased COVID-19 booster vaccination uptake among grandparents in China.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Grandparents , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Male , Female , China , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Aged , Grandparents/psychology , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Health Education , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult
19.
Sci Transl Med ; 16(748): eadn0223, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753806

ABSTRACT

A protective HIV vaccine will likely need to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs). Vaccination with the germline-targeting immunogen eOD-GT8 60mer adjuvanted with AS01B was found to induce VRC01-class bnAb precursors in 97% of vaccine recipients in the IAVI G001 phase 1 clinical trial; however, heterologous boost immunizations with antigens more similar to the native glycoprotein will be required to induce bnAbs. Therefore, we designed core-g28v2 60mer, a nanoparticle immunogen to be used as a first boost after eOD-GT8 60mer priming. We found, using a humanized mouse model approximating human conditions of VRC01-class precursor B cell diversity, affinity, and frequency, that both protein- and mRNA-based heterologous prime-boost regimens induced VRC01-class antibodies that gained key mutations and bound to near-native HIV envelope trimers lacking the N276 glycan. We further showed that VRC01-class antibodies induced by mRNA-based regimens could neutralize pseudoviruses lacking the N276 glycan. These results demonstrated that heterologous boosting can drive maturation toward VRC01-class bnAb development and supported the initiation of the IAVI G002 phase 1 trial testing mRNA-encoded nanoparticle prime-boost regimens.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , Antibodies, Neutralizing , HIV Antibodies , Animals , Humans , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , HIV Antibodies/immunology , Mice , Vaccination , Immunization, Secondary , HIV-1/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies/immunology
20.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11467, 2024 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769324

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 vaccines have been effective in preventing severe illness, hospitalization and death, however, the effectiveness diminishes with time. Here, we evaluated the longevity of antibodies generated by COIVD-19 vaccines and the risk of (re)infection in Bangladeshi population. Adults receiving two doses of AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna or Sinopharm vaccines were enrolled at 2-4 weeks after second dosing and followed-up at 4-monthly interval for 1 year. Data on COVID-like symptoms, confirmed COVID-19 infection, co-morbidities, and receipt of booster dose were collected; blood was collected for measuring spike (S)- and nucleocapsid (N)-specific antibodies. S-specific antibody titers reduced by ~ 50% at 1st follow-up visit and continued to decline unless re-stimulated by booster vaccine dose or (re)infection. Individuals infected between follow-up visits showed significantly lower S-antibody titers at preceding visits compared to the uninfected individuals. Pre-enrolment infection between primary vaccination dosing exhibited 60% and 50% protection against reinfection at 5 and 9 months, respectively. mRNA vaccines provided highest odds of protection from (re)infection up to 5 months (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.08), however, protection persisted for 9 months in AstraZeneca vaccine recipients (OR = 0.06). In conclusion, vaccine-mediated protection from (re)infection is partially linked to elevated levels of S-specific antibodies. AstraZeneca vaccine provided the longest protection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Bangladesh/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Male , Female , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Longitudinal Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Vaccination , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult , Immunization, Secondary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...