Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 26(1): 31-39, 2016. tab, ilus, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-150187

ABSTRACT

Background: Component-based diagnosis on multiplex platforms is widely used in food allergy but its clinical performance has not been evaluated in nut allergy. Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of a commercial protein microarray in the determination of specific IgE (sIgE) in peanut, hazelnut, and walnut allergy. Methods: sIgE was measured in 36 peanut-allergic, 36 hazelnut-allergic, and 44 walnut-allergic patients by ISAC 112, and subsequently, sIgE against available components was determined by ImmunoCAP in patients with negative ISAC results. ImmunoCAP was also used to measure sIgE to Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Jug r 3 in a subgroup of lipid transfer protein (LTP)-sensitized nut-allergic patients (positive skin prick test to LTP-enriched extract). sIgE levels by ImmunoCAP were compared with ISAC ranges. Results: Most peanut-, hazelnut-, and walnut-allergic patients were sensitized to the corresponding nut LTP (Ara h 9, 66.7%; Cor a 8, 80.5%; Jug r 3, 84% respectively). However, ISAC did not detect sIgE in 33.3% of peanut-allergic patients, 13.9% of hazelnut-allergic patients, or 13.6% of walnut-allergic patients. sIgE determination by ImmunoCAP detected sensitization to Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Jug r 3 in, respectively, 61.5% of peanut-allergic patients, 60% of hazelnut-allergic patients, and 88.3% of walnut-allergic patients with negative ISAC results. In the subgroup of peach LTP-sensitized patients, Ara h 9 sIgE was detected in more cases by ImmunoCAP than by ISAC (94.4% vs 72.2%, P<.05). Similar rates of Cor a 8 and Jug r 3 sensitization were detected by both techniques. Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of ISAC was adequate for hazelnut and walnut allergy but not for peanut allergy. sIgE sensitivity against Ara h 9 in ISAC needs to be improved (AU)


Introducción: La utilidad clínica del diagnóstico por componentes no ha sido evaluada en el estudio de la alergia a frutos secos (FS). Objetivo: Evaluar la capacidad diagnóstica de una micromatriz comercial de proteínas alergénicas en la alergia a cacahuete, avellana y nuez. Métodos: Se determinó la sIgE en pacientes alérgicos a FS mediante la micromatriz ISAC 112, e ImmunoCAP en los pacientes con sIgE negativa frente a los componentes de ISAC. Además, se realizó ImmunoCAP frente a Ara h 9, Cor a 8 y Jug r 3 en un subgrupo de pacientes sensibilizados a LTP. La sIgE detectada por ImmunoCAP fue comparada con los rangos de ISAC. Resultados: La mayoría de los alérgicos a cacahuete (66,7%), avellana (80,5%) y nuez (84%) estaba sensibilizados a su LTP. Sin embargo, no se detectó sIgE frente a los componentes de ISAC en el 33,3% de alérgicos a cacahuete, 13,9% de alérgicos a avellana y 13,6% de los alérgicos a nuez. El ImmunoCAP permitió detectar sIgE a Ara h 9 en 61,5%, Cor a 8 en 60% y Jug r 3 en 83,3% de los ISAC negativo. En el subgrupo LTP, ImmunoCAP (94,4%) fue superior a ISAC (72,2%) en la detección de sIgE a Ara h 9 (p<0,05). La sIgE frente a Cor a 8 y Jug r 3 fue detectada de forma similar por ambas técnicas. Conclusiones: La micromatriz ISAC es adecuada para el diagnóstico de alergia a avellana y nuez. La sensibilidad del componente Ara h 9 de ISAC debe ser mejorada (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Nut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Arachis/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Corylus/immunology , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Immunologic Tests/methods , Immunologic Tests , Immunologic Techniques/methods , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/statistics & numerical data , Immunologic Tests/standards , Immunologic Techniques/instrumentation , Immunologic Techniques/standards , Immunologic Techniques
3.
Recife; s.n; 2015. 86 p. ilus.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-983377

ABSTRACT

O exame parasitológico por Kato-Katz ainda é considerado o padrão ouro no diagnóstico da esquistossomose mansônica, entretanto, este apresenta baixa sensibilidade para utilização em inquéritos epidemiológicos. Além disso, as técnicas de diagnóstico imunológico, apresentam reações cruzadas com outros helmintos, protozoários e até bactérias como ocorre com a utilização dos extratos brutos do parasita. Nesse sentido, salientamos que Abath et al. identificaram um peptídeo de 15kDa denominado Sm15, que apresentou uma boa reatividade com soros de animais infectados pelo verme e, portanto, possui potencial para abordagens imunoprofiláticas e para testes diagnósticos. Neste estudo obtivemos o polipeptídio recombinante Sm15 em Escherichia coli e verificamos seu potencial para realização do diagnóstico a partir de amostras de soros de pacientes com diferentes manifestações clínicas da esquistossomose. Através de ELISA constatamos que o Sm15 apresentou maior reatividade frente a soros de pacientes esquistossomóticos, quando comparado ao extrato bruto SEA (P=0.0043). O Sm15 ainda demonstrou melhor desempenho ao apresentar maiores valores de sensibilidade, especificidade e área abaixo da curva ROC (P=0.0030). Além disso, o Sm15 foi capaz de diferenciar pacientes esquistossomóticos quanto à forma clínica, aguda ou crônica (P=0.0007). Os resultados obtidos neste estudo indicam, além de ratificar o potencial diagnóstico apresentado pelo polipeptídeo Sm15, que o mesmo poderá ser capaz de gerar uma alternativa de imunodiagnóstico de elevada acurácia, suprindo assim as lacunas existentes com relação aos testes parasitológicos e sorológicos atualmente disponíveis. Além disso, possibilitará o diagnostico precoce da esquistossomose, realização de inquéritos epidemiológicos em áreas de baixa endemicidade, impedindo assim a evolução da doença para formas clínicas de maior gravidade.


The parasitological examination by Kato-Katz still considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of schistosomiasis, however, it has low sensitivity for use in epidemiological surveys. Moreover, the techniques of immunological diagnosis, have cross-reactivity with other helminth, protozoa and even bacteria as occur with the use of crude parasite extracts. In this regard, we note that Abath and colleagues identified a 15kDa peptide termed SM15, which showed good reactivity with sera from animals infected by the worm, and therefore has potential immunoprophylactic and diagnostic testing approaches. In this study we obtained the recombinant polypeptide in Escherichia coli SM15 and check its potential for making the diagnosis from samples of patient sera with different clinical manifestations of schistosomiasis. By ELISA we found that the SM15 showed higher reactivity towards sera from schistosomiasis patients, when compared to the crude extract SEA (P = 0.0043). The SM15 also demonstrated better performance by presenting higher sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (P = 0.0030). In addition, the SM15 was able to differentiate schistosomiasis patients about the clinical presentation, acute or chronic (P = 0.0007). The results of this study indicate not only ratifies the diagnostic potential presented by the SM15 polypeptide, that it may be able to generate an immunodiagnostic alternative high accuracy, thereby supplying the gaps in the parasitological and serological tests currently available. Also, it enables the early diagnosis of schistosomiasis, carrying out epidemiological surveys in low endemicity areas, thereby preventing disease progression to more severe clinical forms.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/methods , Recombinant Proteins , Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification , Schistosomiasis , Antigens, Helminth/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Helminth Proteins/genetics , Helminth Proteins/immunology , Schistosoma mansoni/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Fed Regist ; 79(104): 31021-3, 2014 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24881094

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying dengue virus serological reagents into class II (special controls). The special controls that will apply to the device are identified in this order, and the codified language for the dengue serological reagents classification will include the identification of the special controls that will apply to this device. The Agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) because special controls, in addition to general controls, will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.


Subject(s)
Dengue/blood , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Indicators and Reagents/classification , Microbiological Techniques/classification , Microbiological Techniques/instrumentation , Serology/classification , Serology/instrumentation , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Fed Regist ; 76(251): 82129-31, 2011 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22242228

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the regulation classifying ovarian adnexal mass assessment score test systems to restrict these devices so that a prescribed warning statement that addresses a risk identified in the special controls guidance document must be in a black box and must appear in all labeling, advertising, and promotional material. The black box warning mitigates the risk to health associated with off-label use as a screening test, stand-alone diagnostic test, or as a test to determine whether or not to proceed with surgery.


Subject(s)
Adnexal Diseases/classification , Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological/classification , Genital Neoplasms, Female/classification , Immunologic Tests/classification , Ovarian Neoplasms/classification , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Serologic Tests/classification , Adnexal Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Humans , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Off-Label Use/legislation & jurisprudence , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Serologic Tests/instrumentation
6.
Fed Regist ; 73(98): 29052-4, 2008 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18605403

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying Plasmodium species antigen detection assays into class II (special controls). The special control that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Plasmodium Species Antigen Detection Assays." The agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of the guidance document that will serve as the special control for this device.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Protozoan/blood , Immunologic Tests/classification , Microbiological Techniques/classification , Plasmodium/immunology , Animals , Humans , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Plasmodium/microbiology , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
7.
Fed Regist ; 70(164): 49862-4, 2005 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16121447

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying ribonucleic acid (RNA) preanalytical systems into class II (special controls). The special control that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: RNA Preanalytical Systems (RNA Collection, Stabilization, and Purification Systems for RT-PCR Used in Molecular Diagnostic Testing)." The agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance document that will serve as the special control for the device.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Equipment/classification , Immunologic Tests/classification , Microbiological Techniques/classification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/classification , Equipment Safety/classification , Humans , Immunologic Tests/instrumentation , Microbiological Techniques/instrumentation , RNA/analysis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/instrumentation , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
Wiad Parazytol ; 50(2): 201-8, 2004.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16859025

ABSTRACT

The immunochromatographic tests with HRP-2 antigen (histidine-rich protein) Vision Biotech Pf Rapid Malaria Test was performed in 291 children under 5 years presenting fever or history of fever (malaria presumptive cases) admitted to Children Out-Patient Department of the Modilon Hospital in Madang, in a high malaria risk area of Papua New Guinea. The results of the tests were compared to the results of the parasitic examination of the peripheral blood with light microscopy (thick and thin smears). The HRP-2 test showed very high sensitivity (95.4%) and specificity (94.1%) for Plasmodiumfalciparum parasitaemia and none or very low sensitivity and specificity for other malaria species. The HRP-2 test detected both asexual and sexual stages of the Plasmodium falciparum parasites. The test did not show significant changes in detection of different levels of parasitaemia. These findings enable to conclude that the HRP-2 immunochromatographic assay can be very helpful to diagnose Plasmodium falciparum malaria when microscopy examination is not available, but as qualitative tests can be difficult for interpretation especially in high malaria risk areas. Therefore it can require re-examination of blood with microscopy to confirm species and development stages of Plasmodium spp. and to assess parasite load.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Protozoan/blood , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Malaria, Falciparum/diagnosis , Malaria, Falciparum/transmission , Protozoan Proteins/blood , Animals , Antigens, Protozoan/immunology , Child, Preschool , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Immunologic Tests/classification , Infant , Malaria, Falciparum/immunology , Papua New Guinea , Plasmodium falciparum/cytology , Plasmodium falciparum/isolation & purification , Protozoan Proteins/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Fed Regist ; 68(211): 62007-8, 2003 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14594019

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the endotoxin assay into class II (special controls). The agency is taking this action in response to a petition submitted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) as amended by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (the amendments), the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (SMDA), the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA), and the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA). The agency is classifying this device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance document that will serve as the special control for the device.


Subject(s)
Endotoxins/classification , Device Approval , Endotoxemia/blood , Equipment Safety/classification , Humans , Immunologic Tests/classification , Microbiological Techniques/classification , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
11.
Allerg Immunol (Paris) ; 31 Spec No: 23-30, 1999 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10379408

ABSTRACT

The performances of the reagents for IN VITRO TESTS in Allergy, are very variable, in spite of the existence of registration procedures as well as those of national quality control. Most of the discrepancies have their origin in the choice of technologies used by the manufacturers (reaction support, raw materials, calibration, vigour of the process of execution). It follows from this that the characteristics must be understood and the limitations appreciated of the tests that are used, as well as their interpretation. Of such information that is accessible in the records of the National Control of Quality of the Medicines Agency, as well as in the studies that are done with the aim of evaluating analytical and/or clinical performance of available tests (this work is a review of the performances of most of the tests sold in France today). It stands out that the best borders on very mediocre and that it is indispensable, like the planned nomenclature of the medical biological consultations, to take into consideration the technique used to obtain a result for interpretation of the latter.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunologic Tests , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Allergens/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Calibration , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , France , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Immunologic Tests/classification , Immunologic Tests/methods , Immunologic Tests/standards , Quality Control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...