Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gene ; 589(2): 112-7, 2016 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26850130

ABSTRACT

It is 60years since the discovery of the correct number of chromosomes in 1956; the field of cytogenetics had evolved. The late evolution of this field with respect to other fields is primarily due to the underdevelopment of lenses and imaging techniques. With the advent of the new technologies, especially automation and evolution of advanced compound microscopes, cytogenetics drastically leaped further to greater heights. This review describes the historic events that had led to the development of human cytogenetics with a special attention about the history of cytogenetics in India, its present status, and future. Apparently, this review provides a brief account into the insights of the early laboratory establishments, funding, and the German collaborations. The details of the Indian cytogeneticists establishing their labs, promoting the field, and offering the chromosomal diagnostic services are described. The detailed study of chromosomes helps in increasing the knowledge of the chromosome structure and function. The delineation of the chromosomal rearrangements using cytogenetics and molecular cytogenetic techniques pays way in identifying the molecular mechanisms involved in the chromosomal rearrangement. Although molecular cytogenetics is greatly developing, the conventional cytogenetics still remains the gold standard in the diagnosis of various numerical chromosomal aberrations and a few structural aberrations. The history of cytogenetics and its importance even in the era of molecular cytogenetics are discussed.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations/classification , Chromosomes, Human/ultrastructure , Cytogenetics/history , Diagnostic Services/history , Chromosomes, Human/chemistry , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/history , Comparative Genomic Hybridization/methods , Cytogenetics/methods , Diagnostic Services/organization & administration , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/history , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , India , Karyotyping/history , Karyotyping/methods
2.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 137(2-4): 83-96, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846392

ABSTRACT

Genome diversity has long been studied from the comparative cytogenetic perspective. Early workers documented differences between species in diploid chromosome number and fundamental number. Banding methods allowed more detailed descriptions of between-species rearrangements and classes of differentially staining chromosome material. The infusion of molecular methods into cytogenetics provided a third revolution, which is still not exhausted. Chromosome painting has provided a global view of the translocation history of mammalian genome evolution, well summarized in the contributions to this special volume. More recently, FISH of cloned DNA has provided details on defining breakpoint and intrachromosomal marker order, which have helped to document inversions and centromere repositioning. The most recent trend in comparative molecular cytogenetics is to integrate sequencing information in order to formulate and test reconstructions of ancestral genomes and phylogenomic hypotheses derived from comparative cytogenetics. The integration of comparative cytogenetics and sequencing promises to provide an understanding of what drives chromosome rearrangements and genome evolution in general. We believe that the contributions in this volume, in no small way, point the way to the next phase in cytogenetic studies.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis , Mammals/genetics , Animals , Birds/genetics , Chromosome Painting/history , Cytogenetic Analysis/history , Cytogenetic Analysis/trends , DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic , Evolution, Molecular , Genomics , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , Karyotyping , Models, Genetic , Reptiles/genetics
3.
Methods Mol Biol ; 730: 3-12, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21431631

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic methods have not changed greatly over the last 50 years since Nowell and Hungerford's description of the Philadelphia chromosome but the clinical utility of these methods has evolved dramatically. The multicentre clinical studies that have identified major clinical applications for cytogenetic analysis in different cancers and the development of in situ hybridization have contributed to an explosion in cytogenetic testing for cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/history , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , Karyotyping , Neoplasms/history
4.
Biochim Biophys Acta ; 1779(6-7): 363-75, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515111

ABSTRACT

A parallelism exists between human cytogenetics and cytogenetic toxicology. The breakthroughs, mostly coming from and used in clinical genetics, are widely used in genetic toxicology. The birth of human cytogenetics occurred in 1956 when it was published that the diploid number of chromosomes in humans is 46. The first stage in chromosome-induced mutagenesis began in 1938 when Sax published the effects of X-rays on the chromosomes of Drosophila. In 1959, the cytogenetic anomalies for Down, Klinefelter, and Turner syndromes were described, and parallelly in 1960, the first publication on chromosomal aberrations in man caused by ionizing radiation appeared. The cytogenetic analysis of chromosomal aberrations in cell cultures is considered one of the primary methods to evaluate induced mutagenesis. At the end of the 1960s, banding techniques allowed chromosomes to be individually identified, in parallel, the sister chromatid exchange analysis technology was described. Another milestone in the history of induced mutagenesis was the discovery that mutagenic agents were able to alter chromosomal division and segregation in gonads inducing meiotic nondisjunction. Here we review new approaches and applications such as biological dosimetry, translocation scoring using FISH, and micronucleus test. Chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus test are now effective cytogenetic biomarkers of early effect used as cancer predictors. Human cytogenetics has proven to be effective over its 50-year lifespan and, although each new technique that has appeared seemed to announce its end, the fact is that the current state of cytogenetics is in reality a collection of techniques that, while common, are cheap, fast, and wide-ranging. Therefore, in genotoxicology, they continue to be useful to identify mutagenic agents as well as to evaluate and analyze exposed populations.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetics , Toxicogenetics , Animals , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human/genetics , Cytogenetics/history , Cytogenetics/trends , Female , Genetic Techniques/history , Genetic Techniques/trends , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/trends , Male , Mutagenesis , Mutation , Toxicogenetics/history , Toxicogenetics/trends
5.
Cytogenet Genome Res ; 120(1-2): 11-25, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18467822

ABSTRACT

Cytogenetics was conceived in the late 1800s and nurtured through the early 1900s by discoveries pointing to the chromosomal basis of inheritance. The relevance of chromosomes to human health and disease was realized more than half a century later when improvements in techniques facilitated unequivocal chromosome delineation. Veterinary cytogenetics has benefited from the information generated in human cytogenetics which, in turn, owes its theoretical and technical advancement to data gathered from plants, insects and laboratory mammals. The scope of this science has moved from the structure and number of chromosomes to molecular cytogenetics for use in research or for diagnostic and prognostic purposes including comparative genomic hybridization arrays, single nucleotide polymorphism array-based karyotyping and automated systems for counting the results of standard FISH preparations. Even though the counterparts to a variety of human diseases and disorders are seen in domestic animals, clinical applications of veterinary cytogenetics will be less well exploited mainly because of the cost-driven nature of demand on diagnosis and treatment which often out-weigh emotional and sentimental attachments. An area where the potential of veterinary cytogenetics will be fully exploited is reproduction since an inherited aberration that impacts on reproductive efficiency can compromise the success achieved over the years in animal breeding. It is gratifying to note that such aberrations can now be tracked and tackled using sophisticated cytogenetic tools already commercially available for RNA expression analysis, chromatin immunoprecipitation, or comparative genomic hybridization using custom-made microarray platforms that allow the construction of microarrays that match veterinary cytogenetic needs, be it for research or for clinical applications. Judging from the technical refinements already accomplished in veterinary cytogenetics since the 1960s, it is clear that the importance of the achievements to date are bound to be matched or out-weighed by what awaits to be accomplished in the not-too-far future.


Subject(s)
Cytogenetic Analysis/veterinary , Cytogenetics , Veterinary Medicine , Animals , Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly , Chromosome Banding/history , Chromosome Mapping/history , Chromosome Mapping/veterinary , Cytogenetic Analysis/history , Cytogenetics/history , Epigenesis, Genetic , Female , Heterochromatin/genetics , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/veterinary , Male , Pregnancy , Reproduction/genetics , Synaptonemal Complex/genetics , Veterinary Medicine/history
6.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 11(6): 750-60, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16417742

ABSTRACT

Genetics proved essential to introduce IVF, preimplantation diagnosis (PGD) and embryo stem cells in the 1960s. Its small input in early years was confined to aspects such as timing follicle growth and ovulation. Modest understanding in the mid- to late 1980s, mostly on studies in mice, involved the actions of single genes and the balance between maternal and zygotic transcripts in preimplantation stages. Human IVF began after human oocytes were matured in vitro, and their meiotic chromosomes analysed. Their fertilization in vitro led to PGD and embryo stem cells. Unlike mouse embryos, most human embryos failed to implant, so the best had to be selected to improve IVF pregnancy rates. Initially, faster-growing embryos proved superior. Later, patterns of polarized nucleoli in pronuclei, the degree of blastomere fragmentation and growth of embryos in vitro to blastocysts provided excellent markers. Single cells could be isolated from embryos using micromanipulation. Stem cells from inner cell mass, a branch of IVF, differentiated into immortal stem cell lines in vitro if disaggregated. They formed virtually all body tissues in blastocysts cultured intact or when injected singly into recipient blastocysts. Later, the genetic controls of ES cell differentiation were assessed, together with factors switching them along specific differentiation pathways. Marker genes identified ES cells differentiating into various tissues.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Stem Cells/cytology , Animals , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Embryo, Mammalian/cytology , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , Infertility/therapy , Male , Mice , Ovulation Induction/history , Pregnancy , Preimplantation Diagnosis/history , Research/history
7.
Nat Rev Genet ; 3(10): 769-78, 2002 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12360235

ABSTRACT

Human cytogenetics was born in 1956 with the fundamental, but empowering, discovery that normal human cells contain 46 chromosomes. Since then, this field and our understanding of the link between chromosomal defects and disease have grown in spurts that have been fuelled by advances in cytogenetic technology. As a mature enterprise, cytogenetics now informs human genomics, disease and cancer genetics, chromosome evolution and the relationship of nuclear structure to function.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes/genetics , Cytogenetics/history , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosome Painting/history , Chromosomes/ultrastructure , Cytogenetics/trends , Flow Cytometry/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/history , Karyotyping/methods , Nucleic Acid Hybridization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...