ABSTRACT
Subject(s)
Health of Indigenous Peoples , Health Councils , Human Rights , Indigenous Peoples/legislation & jurisprudence , Indigenous Culture , Ethnic Distribution , Violence , Land Management and Planning , Brazil , Healthcare Financing , Health Expenditures , Cost Control , Federal GovernmentSubject(s)
Ethics Committees, Research , Ethics, Research , Indigenous Peoples , Research Personnel , Research , Universities , Humans , Universities/ethics , Universities/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics Committees, Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Research Personnel/ethics , Research Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Indigenous Peoples/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Human rights are foundational to the health and well-being of all individuals and have remained a central tenet of nursing's ethical framework throughout history. The purpose of this study is to explore continuity and changes to human rights in nursing codes of ethics in the Canadian context. This study examines nursing codes of ethics between the years 1953 and 2017, which spans the very first code in Canada to the most recently adopted. The historical method is used to compare and contrast human rights language, positioning and descriptions between different code editions. The findings suggest there has been very little change in how human rights have been included within the Canadian nursing codes of ethics. Furthermore, we consider how changes within the nursing profession have influenced the authority of codes of ethics and their ability to support nurses in carrying out ethical obligations specific to human rights. Finally, the impacts and implications of these changes are discussed concerning the protection of human rights in today's healthcare landscape in Canada.
Subject(s)
Codes of Ethics/trends , Ethics, Nursing , Human Rights/trends , Societies, Nursing/history , Canada , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Indigenous Peoples/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Research ethics regulation in parts of the Global North has sometimes been initiated in the face of biomedical scandal. More recently, developing and recently developed countries have had additional reasons to regulate, doing so to attract international clinical trials and American research funding, publish in international journals, or to respond to broader social changes. In Taiwan, biomedical research ethics policy based on 'principlism' and committee-based review were imported from the United States. Professionalisation of research ethics displaced other longer-standing ways of conceiving ethics connected with Taiwanese cultural traditions. Subsequently, the model and its discursive practices were extended to other disciplines. Regulation was also shaped by decolonizing discourses associated with asserting Indigenous peoples' rights. Locating research ethics regulation within the language and practices of public policy formation and transfer as well as decolonization, allows analysis to move beyond the self-referential and attend to the social, economic and political context within which regulation operates.
