Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
Infant Ment Health J ; 41(2): 163-165, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32285498

ABSTRACT

This issue of the Infant Mental Health Journal presents the first papers from a tripartite evaluation study of state-sponsored infant mental health home visiting program in Michigan, United States. This series of studies has been led by Kate Rosenblum PhD and Maria Muzik MD, Department of Psychiatry, the University of Michigan and faculty from the Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research for the State of Michigan, Department of Health and Human Services, Mental Health Services for Children, to fulfill the requirements of state legislation (State of Michigan Act No. 291, Public Acts of 2013) that required that all home visiting programs meet certain requirements to be established as an evidence-based practice. In this introduction, we provide a historical context for the delivery of infant mental health home visiting through the community mental health system in the state of Michigan.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/history , House Calls , Mental Health Services/history , Mental Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Child, Preschool , Evidence-Based Practice , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant, Newborn , Mental Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Michigan , Postnatal Care , Program Development , State Government
2.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(1): e001937, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133169

ABSTRACT

There are global calls for research to support health system strengthening in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). To examine the nature and magnitude of gaps in access and quality of inpatient neonatal care provided to a largely poor urban population, we combined multiple epidemiological and health services methodologies. Conducting this work and generating findings was made possible through extensive formal and informal stakeholder engagement linked to flexibility in the research approach while keeping overall goals in mind. We learnt that 45% of sick newborns requiring hospital care in Nairobi probably do not access a suitable facility and that public hospitals provide 70% of care accessed with private sector care either poor quality or very expensive. Direct observations of care and ethnographic work show that critical nursing workforce shortages prevent delivery of high-quality care in high volume, low-cost facilities and likely threaten patient safety and nurses' well-being. In these challenging settings, routines and norms have evolved as collective coping strategies so health professionals maintain some sense of achievement in the face of impossible demands. Thus, the health system sustains a functional veneer that belies the stresses undermining quality, compassionate care. No one intervention will dramatically reduce neonatal mortality in this urban setting. In the short term, a substantial increase in the number of health workers, especially nurses, is required. This must be combined with longer term investment to address coverage gaps through redesign of services around functional tiers with improved information systems that support effective governance of public, private and not-for-profit sectors.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Health Services Accessibility , Infant Care , Quality of Health Care , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/standards , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/economics , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy , Kenya
3.
Public Health Nutr ; 22(3): 553-563, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30394255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Mothers' return to work and childcare providers' support for feeding expressed human milk are associated with breast-feeding duration rates in the USA, where most infants are regularly under non-parental care. The objective of the present study was to explore Florida-based childcare centre administrators' awareness and perceptions of the Florida Breastfeeding Friendly Childcare Initiative. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and analysed using applied thematic analysis. SETTING: Childcare centre administrators in Tampa Bay, FL, USA, interviewed in 2015.ParticipantsTwenty-eight childcare centre administrators: female (100 %) and Non-Hispanic White (61 %) with mean age of 50 years and 13 years of experience. RESULTS: Most administrators perceived potential implementation of the Florida Breastfeeding Friendly Childcare Initiative as simple and beneficial. Tension for change and a related construct (perceived consumer need for the initiative) were low, seemingly due to formula-feeding being normative. Perceived financial costs and relative priority varied. Some centres had facilitating structural characteristics, but none had formal breast-feeding policies. CONCLUSIONS: A cultural shift, facilitated by state and national breast-feeding-friendly childcare policies and regulations, may be important for increasing tension for change and thereby increasing access to breast-feeding-friendly childcare. Similar to efforts surrounding the rapid growth of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, national comprehensive evidence-based policies, regulations, metrics and technical assistance are needed to strengthen state-level breast-feeding-friendly childcare initiatives.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Caregivers , Infant Care , Nurseries, Infant/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Aged , Attitude , Bottle Feeding , Caregivers/psychology , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/psychology , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Milk, Human/legislation & jurisprudence , Nutrition Policy
4.
Child Obes ; 14(6): 368-374, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30199297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: State policies have the potential to improve early care and education (ECE) settings, but little is known about the extent to which states are updating their licensing and administrative regulations, especially in response to national calls to action. In 2013, we assessed state regulations promoting infant physical activity in ECE and compared them with national recommendations. To assess change over time, we conducted this review again in 2018. METHODS: We reviewed regulations for all US states for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) and compared them with three national recommendations: (1) provide daily tummy time; (2) use cribs, car seats, and high chairs for their primary purpose; and (3) limit the use of restrictive equipment (e.g., strollers). We performed exact McNemar's tests to compare the number of states meeting recommendations from 2013 to 2018 to evaluate whether states had made changes over this period. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2018, we observed significant improvement in one recommendation for homes-to use cribs, car seats, and high chairs for their primary purpose (odds ratio 11.0; 95% CI 1.6-47.3; p = 0.006). We did not observe any other significant difference between 2013 and 2018 regulations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased awareness of the importance of early-life physical activity, we observed only modest improvement in the number of states meeting infant physical activity recommendations over the past 5 years. In practice, ECE programs may be promoting infant physical activity, but may not be required to do so through state regulations.


Subject(s)
Child Day Care Centers/standards , Exercise , Government Regulation , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion , Infant Care/standards , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , Child Day Care Centers/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant, Newborn , Male , Nutrition Policy , Play and Playthings , United States/epidemiology
7.
Matern Child Health J ; 19(4): 745-54, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25001500

ABSTRACT

Policies supporting breastfeeding vary by state, but little is known about the geographical aspects of this variation. This study describes state breastfeeding licensing and administrative regulations targeting child care settings, compares regulations with national standards, and examines the spatial patterning and clustering of these regulations throughout the United States (US). We compared regulations for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) with national standards for: (1) general breastfeeding support; (2) designated place for breastfeeding; (3) no solids before infants are four months of age; and (4) no formula for breastfed infants without parent permission. We scored state regulations as 0 = standard not addressed, 1 = standard partially addressed, and 2 = standard fully addressed. We considered each regulation individually, and also summed scores to provide an overall rating of regulations by state. We mapped regulations using geographic information systems technology, and explored overall and local spatial autocorrelation using global and local variants of Moran's I. Five states had regulations for centers and two for homes that addressed all four standards. Mean regulation scores were 0.35, 0.20, 0.98, 0.74 for centers, and 0.17, 0.15, 0.79, 0.58 for homes. Local Moran's I revealed that New York and Pennsylvania had substantially stronger regulations than their adjacent states, while Florida had weaker regulations than its neighbors. Overall, few states had regulations that met breastfeeding standards. We identified some patterns of spatial correlation, suggesting avenues for future research to better understand distributions of regulations across the US.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Child Day Care Centers/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Health Promotion/methods , State Government , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Policy , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant, Newborn , United States/epidemiology
8.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 11: 139, 2014 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25416613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review state regulations promoting increased physical activity and decreased sedentary behaviors in infants in child care and to assess consistency with recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. METHODS: We compared existing state and territory licensing and administrative regulations to recent IOM recommendations to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary time in very young children attending out-of-home child care (both child care centers and family child care homes). Three independent reviewers searched two sources (a publicly available website and WestlawNext™) and compared regulations with five IOM recommendations: 1) providing daily opportunities for infants to move, 2) engaging with infants on the ground, 3) providing daily tummy time for infants less than six months of age, 4) using cribs, car seats and high chairs for their primary purpose, and 5) limiting the use of restrictive equipment for holding infants while they are awake. We used Pearson chi-square tests to assess associations between geographic region, year of last update, and number of state regulations consistent with the IOM recommendations. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of regulations for states was 1.9 (1.3) for centers and 1.6 (1.2) for homes out of a possible 5.0. Two states had regulations for all five recommendations, Arizona for centers and Virginia for homes. Six states and territories had zero regulations for child care centers and seven states and territories had zero regulations for family child care homes. There were no significant associations between geographic region and number of regulations consistent with IOM recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-home child care settings are important targets for optimal early child health interventions. While most states had some regulations related to the promotion of physical activity among infants, few states had regulations for more than three of the five IOM recommendations. Enhancing state regulations in child care facilities could aid in early childhood obesity prevention efforts.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Promotion/standards , Motor Activity , Child Day Care Centers/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Day Care Centers/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/standards , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , United States
11.
Matern Child Health J ; 18(9): 2034-43, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24535146

ABSTRACT

We assessed the relationship between breastfeeding initiation and duration with laws supportive of breastfeeding enacted at the state level. We analyzed breastfeeding practices using the 2003-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We evaluated three measures of breastfeeding practices: Mother's reported breastfeeding initiation, a proxy report of infants ever being breastfeed, and a proxy report of infants being breastfeed for at least 6 months. Survey data were linked to eight laws supportive of breastfeeding enacted at the state level. The most robust laws associated with increased infant breastfeeding at 6 months were an enforcement provision for workplace pumping laws [OR (95 % CI) 2.0 (1.6, 2.6)] and a jury duty exemption for breastfeeding mothers [OR (95 % CI) 1.7 (1.3, 2.1)]. Having a private area in the workplace to express breast milk [OR (95 % CI) 1.3 (1.1, 1.7)] and having break time to breastfeed or pump [OR (95 % CI) 1.2 (1.0, 1.5)] were also important for infant breastfeeding at 6 months. This research responds to breastfeeding advocates' calls for evidence-based data to generate the necessary political action to enact legislation and laws to protect, promote, and support breastfeeding. We identify the laws with the greatest potential to reach the Healthy People 2020 targets for breastfeeding initiation and duration.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Women, Working/legislation & jurisprudence , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/standards , Infant Care/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Middle Aged , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Nutrition Surveys , Public Facilities/standards , Public Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , State Government , Time Factors , United States , Women, Working/statistics & numerical data , Workplace/standards , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
12.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 26 Suppl 1: 3-53, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617260

ABSTRACT

The past decade has witnessed increasing global attention and political support for maternal, newborn and child health. Despite this increased attention, actual progress has been slow and sporadic: coverage of key maternal and newborn health interventions remains low and there are wide disparities in access to care, within and across countries. Strategies for improving maternal and newborn health are closely linked, and can be delivered most effectively through a continuum of care approach. While these interventions are largely known, there is little information on which interventions have a positive health impact for both women and newborns. This supplement identifies the interventions during the preconception, pregnancy, intrapartum and postnatal periods found to have a positive, synergistic effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes. These interventions are then grouped into packages of care for delivery at the community, health center or hospital levels.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Maternal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Continuity of Patient Care/trends , Counseling , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Infant Care/trends , Infant Mortality/trends , Infant Welfare/trends , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Mortality/trends , Maternal Welfare/trends , Pakistan , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , United States , World Health Organization
13.
Matern Child Nutr ; 9(3): 350-8, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22236439

ABSTRACT

This study systematically examined state-level laws protecting breastfeeding, including their current status and historical development, as well as identified gaps across US states and regions. The National Conference of State Legislatures summarised breastfeeding laws for 50 states and DC as of September 2010, which we updated through May 2011. We then searched LexisNexis and Westlaw to find the full text of laws, recording enactment dates and definitions. Laws were coded into five categories: (1) employers are encouraged or required to provide break time and private space for breastfeeding employees; (2) employers are prohibited from discriminating against breastfeeding employees; (3) breastfeeding is permitted in any public or private location; (4) breastfeeding is exempt from public indecency laws; and (5) breastfeeding women are exempt from jury duty. By May 2011, 1 state had enacted zero breastfeeding laws, 10 had one, 22 had two, 12 had three, 5 had four and 1 state had laws across all five categories. While 92% of states allowed mothers to breastfeed in any location and 57% exempted breastfeeding from indecency laws, 37% of states encouraged or required employers to provide break time and accommodations, 24% offered breastfeeding women exemption from jury duty and 16% prohibited employment discrimination. The Northeast had the highest proportion of states with breastfeeding laws and the Midwest had the lowest. Breastfeeding outside the home is protected to varying degrees depending on where women live; this suggests that many women are not covered by comprehensive laws that promote breastfeeding.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant , Mothers , United States , Women, Working
14.
Neonatology ; 102(3): 222-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22833013

ABSTRACT

Wet nursing was widely practiced from antiquity. For the wealthy, it was a way to overcome the burdens of breastfeeding and increase the number of offspring. For the poor, it was an organized industry ensuring regular payment, and in some parishes the major source of income. The abuse of wet nursing, especially the taking in of several nurslings, prompted legislation which became the basis of public health laws in the second half of the 19th century. The qualifications demanded from a mercenary nurse codified by Soran in the 2nd century CE remained unchanged for 1,700 years. When artificial feeding lost its threat thanks to sewage disposal, improved plumbing, the introduction of rubber teats, cooling facilities and commercial formula, wet nursing declined towards the end of the 19th century.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding/ethics , Infant Care , Nurses/legislation & jurisprudence , Breast Feeding/history , Breast Feeding/methods , Crime/ethics , Crime/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Nursing , Female , History, 16th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Infant Care/ethics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/methods , Infant, Newborn , Managed Care Programs/ethics , Managed Care Programs/history , Managed Care Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy
15.
Fed Regist ; 76(243): 78569-71, 2011 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22180935

ABSTRACT

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its regulation concerning the medical benefits package offered to veterans enrolled in the VA health care system. This rulemaking updates the regulation to conform to amendments made by the enactment of the Caregivers and Veteran Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010, which authorized VA to provide certain health care services to a newborn child of a woman veteran who is receiving maternity care furnished by VA. Health services for newborn care will be authorized for no more than seven days after the birth of the child if the veteran delivered the child in a VA facility or in another facility pursuant to a VA contract for maternity services.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Benefits/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Postnatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Prenatal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Veterans Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Veterans/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , United States
16.
Sociol Inq ; 81(4): 499-526, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22171366

ABSTRACT

Using data from the "Early Childhood Longitudinal Study­Birth Cohort," this article emphasizes the central role of poor infant health as a mechanism in the formation of early educational disparities. Results indicate that the varying prevalence of poor infant health across racial/ethnic groups explains a significant portion of the black disadvantage and a moderate portion of the Asian advantage relative to whites in math and reading skills at age four. Results also demonstrate that infant health is an equal opportunity offender across social groups as children with poor health are equally disadvantaged in terms of early cognitive development, regardless of racial/ethnic status. Overall, results indicate that health at birth has important consequences for individual educational achievement and racial/ethnic disparities in cognitive development and school readiness.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Education , Ethnicity , Infant Welfare , Learning , Child, Preschool , Education/economics , Education/history , Education/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethnicity/education , Ethnicity/ethnology , Ethnicity/history , Ethnicity/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/psychology , Infant Welfare/economics , Infant Welfare/ethnology , Infant Welfare/history , Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Welfare/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Motor Skills , Race Relations/history , Race Relations/legislation & jurisprudence , Race Relations/psychology
17.
Econ Hist Rev ; 64(3): 951-72, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22069806

ABSTRACT

The first half of the twentieth century saw rapid improvements in the health and height of British children. Average height and health can be related to infant mortality through a positive selection effect and a negative scarring effect. Examining town-level panel data on the heights of school children, no evidence is found for the selection effect, but there is some support for the scarring effect. The results suggest that the improvement in the disease environment, as reflected by the decline in infant mortality, increased average height by about half a centimetre per decade in the first half of the twentieth century.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Child Development , Infant Mortality , Preventive Medicine , Survivors , Body Height/ethnology , Child , Child Health Services/economics , Child Health Services/history , Child Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Welfare/economics , Child Welfare/ethnology , Child Welfare/history , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Welfare/psychology , Child, Preschool , History, 20th Century , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Mortality/ethnology , Infant Mortality/history , Infant, Newborn , Preventive Medicine/economics , Preventive Medicine/education , Preventive Medicine/history , Preventive Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/economics , Public Health/education , Public Health/history , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Survivors/history , Survivors/legislation & jurisprudence , Survivors/psychology , United Kingdom/ethnology
18.
Econ Inq ; 49(3): 810-37, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22022731

ABSTRACT

This study uses the High School and Beyond data (1980­1992) to examine the importance of educational and fertility expectations in explaining the achievement gap of adolescent mothers for over 5,500 young women from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Using a non-parametric local propensity score regression, the study finds that the economic disadvantage associated with having a child in high school is particularly large in poor socioeconomic environments; however, this disadvantage is a result of preexisting differences in the educational and fertility expectations and is not because of a diminished capacity of the socioeconomic environment to mediate the effect of an unplanned childbirth. The findings suggest that childcare assistance and other policies designed to alleviate the burden of child rearing for young mothers of low means may not produce the desired improvement in their subsequent educational and labor market outcomes. A much earlier policy intervention with a focus on fostering young women's outlook for the future is needed.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Health Services , Fertility , Pregnancy in Adolescence , Schools , Social Problems , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Adolescent Health Services/economics , Adolescent Health Services/history , Adolescent Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Birth Rate/ethnology , Child , Child Care/economics , Child Care/history , Child Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Care/psychology , Child, Preschool , Educational Status , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Infant , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Adolescence/ethnology , Pregnancy in Adolescence/physiology , Pregnancy in Adolescence/psychology , Schools/economics , Schools/history , Schools/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Problems/economics , Social Problems/ethnology , Social Problems/history , Social Problems/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Problems/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors/history
19.
Popul Dev Rev ; 36(4): 775-801, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21174870

ABSTRACT

Nearly every European Country has experienced some increase in nonmarital childbearing, largely due to increasing births within cohabitation. Relatively few studies in Europe, however, investigate the educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation or how it changed over time. Using retrospective union and fertility histories, we employ competing risk hazard models to examine the educational gradient of childbearing in cohabitation in eight countries across europe. In all countries studied, birth risks within cohabitation demonstrated a negative educational gradient. When directly comparing cohabiting fertility with marital fertility, the negative educational gradient persists in all countries except Italy, although differences were not significant in Austria, France, and West Germany. To explain these findings, we present an alternative explanation for the increase in childbearing within cohabitation that goes beyond the explanation of the Second Demographic Transition and provides a new interpretation of the underlying mechanisms that may influence childbearing within cohabitation.


Subject(s)
Demography , Family Characteristics , Infant Care , Parturition , Residence Characteristics , Socioeconomic Factors , Demography/economics , Demography/history , Demography/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe/ethnology , Family Characteristics/ethnology , Family Characteristics/history , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/psychology , Infant Welfare/economics , Infant Welfare/ethnology , Infant Welfare/history , Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Welfare/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Parturition/ethnology , Parturition/physiology , Parturition/psychology , Pregnancy , Residence Characteristics/history , Single Person/education , Single Person/history , Single Person/legislation & jurisprudence , Single Person/psychology , Single-Parent Family/ethnology , Single-Parent Family/psychology , Social Change/history , Socioeconomic Factors/history
20.
J Womens Hist ; 22(4): 64-89, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21174887

ABSTRACT

This article examines the development of the incubator for premature infants in fin-de-siècle France. During a period of widespread anxiety in France regarding infant mortality and its implications for population growth, physicians in Paris developed and widely promoted the lifesaving technology. This article explores the ways in which the incubator reflected new scientific and symbolic approaches to creating hygienic spaces as well as how it reflected new scientific and symbolic approaches to the traditionally feminine project of infant care. By creating such an isolating and protective milieu around premature infants­an entirely new population of patients­the incubator, I argue, heralded a renegotiation of the boundary between motherhood and medical authority.


Subject(s)
Hygiene , Incubators, Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Premature , Maternal-Fetal Relations , Physicians , France/ethnology , History, 19th Century , Humans , Hygiene/economics , Hygiene/education , Hygiene/history , Hygiene/legislation & jurisprudence , Incubators, Infant/history , Infant , Infant Care/economics , Infant Care/history , Infant Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Care/psychology , Infant Mortality/ethnology , Infant Mortality/history , Infant Welfare/economics , Infant Welfare/ethnology , Infant Welfare/history , Infant Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Infant Welfare/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Maternal-Fetal Relations/ethnology , Maternal-Fetal Relations/history , Maternal-Fetal Relations/physiology , Maternal-Fetal Relations/psychology , Mothers/education , Mothers/history , Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Mothers/psychology , Physicians/economics , Physicians/history , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Physicians/psychology , Professional Role/history , Professional Role/psychology , Public Health/economics , Public Health/education , Public Health/history , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Sanitation/economics , Sanitation/history , Sanitation/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Change/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...