Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
3.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 65(3): 210-4, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25663385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2013, new regulations for the prevention of sharps injuries were introduced in the UK. All health care employers are required to provide the safest possible working environment by preventing or controlling the risk of sharps injuries. AIMS: To analyse data on significant occupational sharps injuries among health care workers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland before the introduction of the 2013 regulations and to assess bloodborne virus seroconversions among health care workers sustaining a blood or body fluid exposure. METHODS: Analysis of 10 years of information on percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures to blood or other body fluids from source patients infected with a bloodborne virus, collected in England, Wales and Northern Ireland through routine surveillance of health care workers reported for the period 2002-11. RESULTS: A total of 2947 sharps injuries involving a source patient infected with a bloodborne virus were reported by health care workers. Significant sharps injuries were 67% higher in 2011 compared with 2002. Sharps injuries involving an HIV-, hepatitis B virus- or hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected source patient increased by 107, 69 and 60%, respectively, between 2002 and 2011. During the study period, 14 health care workers acquired HCV following a sharps injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that during a 10-year period prior to the introduction of new regulations in 2013, health care workers were at risk of occupationally acquired bloodborne virus infection. To prevent sharps injuries, health care service employers should adopt safety-engineered devices, institute safe systems of work and promote adherence to standard infection control procedures.


Subject(s)
Infection Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Body Fluids , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
Glob Public Health ; 9(3): 299-311, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521048

ABSTRACT

As part of expanding and sustaining tuberculosis (TB) control, the Stop TB Partnership of the World Health Organization initiative has called for strong political commitment to TB control, particularly in developing countries. Framing political commitment within the theoretical imperatives of the political economy of health, this study explores the existing and the expected dimensions of political commitment to TB control in Ghana. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 purposively selected staff members of the Ghana Health Service and some political officeholders. In addition, the study analysed laws, policies and regulations relevant to TB control. Four dimensions of political commitment emerged from the interviews: provision of adequate resources (financial, human and infrastructural); political authorities' participation in advocacy for TB; laws and policies' promulgation and social protection interventions. Particularly in respect to financial resources, donors such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria presently give more than 60% of the working budget of the programme. The documentary review showed that laws, policies and regulations existed that were relevant to TB control, albeit they were not clearly linked.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Politics , Preventive Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Financial Support , Ghana , Health Policy/economics , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/economics , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , International Agencies , Interviews as Topic , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Preventive Health Services/economics , Preventive Health Services/trends , Resource Allocation/economics , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , Tuberculosis/economics , World Health Organization
5.
Ann Hepatol ; 9 Suppl: 132-40, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20714010

ABSTRACT

Hepatitis C is a major public health issue. It infects about 200 million people worldwide and is a major cause of chronic liver disease. Its transmission in medical facilities is a topic of increased concern, as outbreaks of the disease had raised the attention of media and medical authorities. To date, evidence suggests that infection from in which a health-care worker is involved is mostly result of bad injecting practices as well as the result of shared medical devices. Furthermore, the infection caused by physicians is rare and very few well documented cases exist on the literature. Among countries, different definitions and legislation exist, in that mode that the responsibility of this issue almost is an obligation of individual institutions. Nonetheless, Hepatitis C virus transmission in medical facilities is an important source of new cases, and as treatments options are very limited, it's recommendable that institutions as well as governments implement policies to avoid Hepatitis C spread in a almost fully preventable setting.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/transmission , Hepatitis C/transmission , Infection Control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional , Occupational Diseases/virology , Occupational Exposure , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/virology , Health Policy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Humans , Infection Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Infection Control/methods , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/ethics , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
6.
Med Lav ; 101(1): 26-9, 2010.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20415046

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The subject was a hospital surgeon who, in the course of routine outpatient surgery with aspiration to collect right lumbar material in a patient with suspected TB infection, accidentally punctured the fifth finger of the left hand with the needle used for this procedure. This led to involvement of the fifth finger of the left hand restricted to the soft tissue with preservation of joint and bone and tenosynovial involvement of the entire extremity. OBJECTIVES: To draw attention to the repercussions for insurance with resulting absence from work for 126 days and an assessment of biological impairment of 2% by the Insurance Institute (INAIL). METHODS: A case report is described of rare occupational tubercular synovitis. CONCLUSIONS: A rare event is reported that occurred in a senior staff member with particular insurance repercussions.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , General Surgery , Hand Injuries/microbiology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional , Needlestick Injuries/complications , Tenosynovitis/etiology , Tuberculosis, Osteoarticular/transmission , Wound Infection/microbiology , Accidents, Occupational/legislation & jurisprudence , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Needlestick Injuries/microbiology , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Management , Sick Leave/legislation & jurisprudence , Spinal Puncture , Tuberculosis, Osteoarticular/etiology , Workers' Compensation/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
Br Dent J ; 207(2): 77-81, 2009 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19629114

ABSTRACT

In 1991, the United Kingdom Advisory Panel (UKAP) was set up under the aegis of the Expert Advisory Group on AIDS (EAGA) to consider individual cases of HIV infected healthcare workers. Policy and guidance relating to HIV infected healthcare workers is set out in a Department of Health report. Although more recently the EAGA has advised that an HIV positive dentist may under certain conditions provide clinical treatment for patients who are also HIV positive, the advice from UKAP relating to exposure-prone procedures means, in effect, that dentists who become HIV positive must cease contemporary clinical dentistry. The plight of dentists who become HIV positive and face this situation has been poignantly described as '...the dental practice equivalent of clearing your desk and being escorted off the premises.'


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dental Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Dentists/legislation & jurisprudence , HIV Seropositivity , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/transmission , Advisory Committees/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk Factors , State Dentistry/legislation & jurisprudence , Truth Disclosure , United Kingdom
12.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 133(28-29): 1517-20, 2008 Jul.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18597212

ABSTRACT

As a current case of needlestick injury (NSI) has demonstrated, it is obvious that in clinical practice there is often uncertainty about the procedure if the index patient refuses a blood test or is not able to give his/her consent. The question about the legality of implementing HBV, HCV and HIV testing after NSI is commented on from different points of view: occupational medicine, infection control, virology and the legal system. The testing of the index patient - without his/her consent - seems to be appropriate. The protection of health care workers should be given priority over the right of the index patient "not wanting to know" about his/her infection status.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Needlestick Injuries/complications , Adult , Female , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/transmission , Hepatitis B/blood , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/blood , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Informed Consent/psychology , Male , Needlestick Injuries/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...