Repercussion of inflammatory bowel disease on lung homeostasis: The role of photobiomodulation.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic and multifactorial diseases characterized by dysfunction of the intestinal mucosa and impaired immune response. Data show an important relationship between intestine and respiratory tract. The treatments of IBD are limited. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is an effective anti-inflammatory therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the repercussion of IBD as well as its treatment with PBM on pulmonary homeostasis. Male Wistar rats were submitted to IBD induction by acetic acid and treated or not with PBM. Rats were irradiated with red LED on both right and left sides of the ventral surface and beside the external anal region during 3 consecutive days (wavelenght 660 nm, power 100 mw, total energy 15 J and time of irradiation 150 s per point). Our results showed that IBD altered pulmonary homeostasis, since we observed an increase in the histopathological score, in myeloperoxidase activity (MPO), in mast cell degranulation, and in the release and gene expression of cytokines. We also showed that PBM treatment reduced biomarkers of IBD and reverted all augmented parameters in the lung, restoring its homeostasis. Thus, we confirm experimentally the important gut-lung axis and the role of PBM as a promising therapy.

Safety of Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has historically been considered a relative contraindication for pelvic radiation therapy (RT). To date, no systematic review has summarized the toxicity profile of RT for patients with prostate cancer and comorbid IBD. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A PRISMA-guided systematic search was conducted on PubMed/Embase for original investigations that reported gastrointestinal (GI; rectal/bowel) toxicity in patients with IBD undergoing RT for prostate cancer. The substantial heterogeneity in patient population, follow-up, and toxicity reporting practices precluded a formal meta-analysis; however, a summary of the individual study-level data and crude pooled rates was described. RESULTS: Twelve retrospective studies with 194 patients were included: 5 examined predominantly low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) monotherapy, 1 predominantly high-dose-rate BT monotherapy, 3 mixed external beam RT (3-dimensional conformal or intensity modulated RT [IMRT]) + low-dose-rate BT, 1 IMRT + high-dose-rate BT, and 2 stereotactic RT. Among these studies, patients with active IBD, patients receiving pelvic RT, and patients with prior abdominopelvic surgery were underrepresented. In all but 1 publication, the rate of late grade 3+ GI toxicities was <5%. The crude pooled rate of acute and late grade 2+ GI events was 15.3% (n = 27/177 evaluable patients; range, 0%-100%) and 11.3% (n = 20/177 evaluable patients; range, 0%-38.5%), respectively. Crude rates of acute and late grade 3+ GI events were 3.4% (6 cases; range, 0%-23%) and 2.3% (4 cases; range, 0%-15%). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate RT in patients with comorbid IBD appears to be associated with low rates of grade 3+ GI toxicity; however, patients must be counseled regarding the possibility for lower-grade toxicities. These data cannot be generalized to the underrepresented subpopulations mentioned above, and individualize decision-making is recommended for those high-risk cases. Several strategies should be considered to minimize the probability of toxicity in this susceptible population, including careful patient selection, minimizing elective (nodal) treatment volumes, using rectal sparing techniques, and employing contemporary RT advancements to minimize exposure to GI organs at risk (eg, IMRT, magnetic resonance imaging-based target delineation, and high-quality daily image guidance).

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in men with underlying inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Historically, IBD has been thought to increase the underlying risk of radiation related toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer. In the modern era, contemporary radiation planning and delivery may mitigate radiation-related toxicity in this theoretically high-risk cohort. This is the first manuscript to report clinical outcomes for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and underlying IBD curatively treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: A large institutional database of patients (n = 4245) treated with SBRT for adenocarcinoma of the prostate was interrogated to identify patients who were diagnosed with underlying IBD prior to treatment. All patients were treated with SBRT over five treatment fractions using a robotic radiosurgical platform and fiducial tracking. Baseline IBD characteristics including IBD subtype, pre-SBRT IBD medications, and EPIC bowel questionnaires were reviewed for the IBD cohort. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated using the CTCAE version 5.0. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were identified who had underlying IBD prior to SBRT for the curative treatment of prostate cancer. The majority (n = 18) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and were being treated with local steroid suppositories for IBD. No biochemical relapses were observed in the IBD cohort with early follow up. High-grade acute and late toxicities were rare (n = 1, grade 3 proctitis) with a median time to any GI toxicity of 22 months. Hemorrhoidal flare was the most common low-grade toxicity observed (n = 3). CONCLUSION: To date, this is one of the largest groups of patients with IBD treated safely and effectively with radiation for prostate cancer and the only review of patients treated with SBRT. Caution is warranted when delivering therapeutic radiation to patients with IBD, however modern radiation techniques appear to have mitigated the risk of GI side effects.

A Matched Case-Control Analysis of Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Rectal Cancer Treated With Pelvic Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a known risk factor for rectal cancer, and RT is often an important part of therapy for these patients. Previously published studies have raised concerns for increased rates of RT toxicity in patients with IBD. We performed a matched case-control analysis to assess RT-related toxicity in a large sample of U.S. veterans afflicted with IBD and rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 186 veterans with rectal cancer (71 Patients with IBD treated with RT, 71 matched controls without IBD treated with RT, and 44 nonmatched controls with IBD treated without RT) diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. We analyzed short- and long-term toxicity and mortality in multivariable logistic regression, Fine-Gray, and frailty models, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: When comparing patients with and without IBD treated with RT there were no differences in RT breaks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-4.76; P = .49) or the need for antidiarrheal medication during RT (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.70-3.35; P = .29). There was a trend toward higher risk of hospital admission during RT for RT + patients with IBD (aOR, 2.69; 95% CI, 0.88-8.22; P = .08). There were higher rates of small bowel obstruction (OR, 15; 95% CI, 1.9-115; P = .009) and a trend toward higher rates of abdominopelvic adhesions (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.98-13; P = .05) in the RT + IBD cohort. However, compared with a nonmatched cohort of patients with IBD treated without RT there were no differences in long-term complications. No differences were found in other acute or long-term toxicities. Rectal cancer-specific mortality appeared similar across all cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: RT does not appear to increase the rates of acute or long-term toxicity in patients with IBD and should be considered a standard part of therapy when otherwise indicated.

Differences in short-term outcomes among patients undergoing IPAA with or without preoperative radiation: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single-institution studies demonstrate a correlation between preoperative pelvic radiation and poor long-term pouch function after IPAA. The rarity of the radiated pelvis before these procedures limits the ability to draw conclusions on the effects of preoperative radiation on short-term outcomes, which may contribute to long-term pouch dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to better understand the impact of pelvic radiation on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing IPAA. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2011). SETTINGS: The study was conducted at all participating NSQIP institutions. PATIENTS: The cohort was composed of patients undergoing nonemergent IPAA procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients experiencing postoperative complications within 30 days were compared by Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests based on whether they received preoperative radiation. Multivariate logistic regression models controlled for the effects of multiple risk factors. RESULTS: Included were 3172 patients receiving IPAA; 162 received pelvic radiation. The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different in patients receiving pelvic radiation versus not receiving pelvic radiation (p = 0.06). In a subset of patients with cancer diagnoses (n = 598), 157 received pelvic radiation; complication rates were not significantly different (p = 0.16). Patients receiving pelvic radiation had significantly lower rates of sepsis in both the overall and cancer diagnosis groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.047), a finding which persisted after controlling for the effects of multiple risk factors (multivariate p values = 0.030 and 0.047). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective database design with short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received radiation before IPAA had no difference in overall 30-day complication rates but had significantly lower rates of sepsis when compared with patients not receiving pelvic radiation. The perceived inferior long-term pouch function in patients undergoing preoperative pelvic radiation does not appear to be attributable to increases in 30-day complications.

Cumulative radiation dose from medical imaging in chronic adult patients.

Chronic patients require ongoing care that results in repeated imaging and exposure to ionizing radiation for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. This is of concern due to the long-term effects of radiation exposure, namely the association between radiation and increased cancer risk. In this study, the scientific literature on cumulated dose of radiation accrued from medical imaging by 4 cohorts of chronic patients (cardiac disease, end-stage kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair) was systematically reviewed. We found that the cumulative effective dose is moderate in cardiac and inflammatory bowel disease patients, high in end-stage kidney disease patients, and very high in endovascular aortic repair patients. We concluded that radiation burden of medical imaging is high in selected cohorts of chronic patients. Efforts should be implemented to reduce this cumulative dose and its potential attendant risks.

Suppression of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by radon inhalation.

The enhanced release of reactive oxygen species from activated neutrophils plays important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. We previously reported that radon inhalation activates antioxidative functions in various organs of mice. In this study, we examined the protective effects of radon inhalation on dextran sulfate sodium- (DSS) induced colitis in mice which were subjected to DSS for 7 days. Mice were continuously treated with air only (sham) or radon at a concentration of 2000 Bq/m³ from a day before DSS administration to the end of colitis induction. In the results, radon inhalation suppressed the elevation of the disease activity index score and histological damage score induced by DSS. Based on the changes in tumor necrosis factor-alpha in plasma and myeloperoxidase activity in the colon, it was shown that radon inhalation suppressed DSS-induced colonic inflammation. Moreover, radon inhalation suppressed lipid peroxidation of the colon induced by DSS. The antioxidant level (superoxide dismutase and total glutathione) in the colon after DSS administration was significantly higher in mice treated with radon than with the sham. These results suggested that radon inhalation suppressed DSS-induced colitis through the enhancement of antioxidative functions in the colon.

Quantifying exposure to diagnostic medical radiation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: are we contributing to malignancy?

BACKGROUND: While potential risks of diagnostic medical radiation are acknowledged, actual exposure of patients in routine clinical practice is poorly documented. AIM: To quantify such exposure to vulnerable abdominal organs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who are already at risk of intestinal cancer. METHODS: All incidences of exposure to diagnostic medical radiation were documented in a consecutive series of 100 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (62 Crohn's disease, 37 ulcerative colitis, 1 indeterminate colitis) attending a hospital-based clinic. Total effective dose (mSv) was calculated using published tables. Predictors of high or no irradiation were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen patients had no documented diagnostic irradiation. Twenty-three patients received an effective dose greater than 25 mSv. An at-risk effective dose >50 mSv was received by 11 patients. Dosage was higher in patients with Crohn's disease than ulcerative colitis (P = 0.02) and in patients undergoing surgery (P = 0.004). However, no predictive factors for high radiation dosage or for no exposure were identified. CONCLUSIONS: At-risk irradiation from diagnostic medical radiation is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and might potentially contribute to the elevated risk of intra-abdominal and other cancers. The level of irradiation should be considered in clinical decisions regarding abdominal imaging.

The effect of nonmalignant systemic disease on tolerance to radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Some patients with nonmalignant systemic diseases, like collagen vascular disease (CVD), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), tolerate radiation therapy poorly. Although the mechanisms of each of these disease processes are different, they share a common microvessel pathology that is potentially exacerbated by radiotherapy. This article reviews and evaluates available data examining the effects of these benign disease processes on radiation tolerance. METHODS: We conducted a thorough review of the Anglo-American medical literature from 1960 to 2001 on the effects of radiotherapy on CVD, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and IBD. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified that examined the effects of radiation therapy for cancer in patients with CVDs. Thirteen of 15 studies documented greater occurrences of acute and late toxicities (range 7%-100%). Higher rates of complications were noted especially for nonrheumatoid arthritis CVDs. Nine studies evaluated the effects of hypertension and diabetes on radiation tolerance. All nine studies documented higher rates of late toxicities than in a "control" group (range 34%-100%). When patients had both diabetes and hypertension, the risk of late toxicities was even higher. Six studies examined radiation tolerance of patients with IBD irradiated to the abdomen and pelvis. Five of these six studies showed greater occurrences of acute and late toxicities for patients with IBD, even with precautionary measures like reduced fraction size and volume and patient immobilization (13%-29%). CONCLUSION: The majority of published studies documented lower radiation tolerance for patients who have CVD, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and IBD. This may reflect a publication bias, as the majority of these studies are retrospective with small numbers of patients and use different scoring scales for complications. These factors may contribute to an overestimation of true radiation-induced morbidity. Although the paucity of data makes precise estimates difficult, a subset of patients, in particular, those with active CVD, IBD, or a combination of uncontrolled hypertension with type I diabetes, is likely to be at higher risk. Future prospective trials need to document these disease entities when reporting treatment-related complications and also must monitor toxicities associated with quiescent versus active IBD and CVD, type I versus type II diabetes, and levels of hypertension (controlled versus uncontrolled) matched for radiation-specific treatment sites, field size, fractionation, and total dose.