Effects of prednisolone tapering on effectiveness of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from a retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The influence of concomitant prednisolone on clinical outcomes and safety in infliximab-treated ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 147 UC patients treated with infliximab at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre. Primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at week 14 and week 52. Patients were grouped according to prednisolone tapering regimens: standard (≤5 mg/week), fast (>5 mg/week), direct discontinuation or no prednisolone. Patients intolerant to corticosteroids and patients stopping corticosteroids in preparation for surgery including colectomy during their initial admission were excluded. RESULTS: There was no overall association between prednisolone exposure or no exposure and CFCR at weeks 14 or 52 of infliximab. The proportion of patients with C reactive protein ≤5 mg/L was higher in the standard tapering at week 14 as compared with faster regimens or no prednisolone. In subgroup analyses, the standard tapering was associated with a higher rate of CFCR at week 14 compared with the fast-tapering regimen in patients receiving ≥40 mg prednisolone at initiation of infliximab (64.3% vs 26.3%, p=0.04) and among patients admitted with acute severe UC (66.6% vs 23.5%, p<0.05). Similar data were seen at week 52. Prednisolone did not affect infliximab trough levels but increased infection rates (10/77 vs 2/70, p=0.03), in particular C. difficile infection. CONCLUSION: In UC patients with limited disease burden, prednisolone did not affect effectiveness of infliximab. However, patients with increased disease burden seem to benefit from corticosteroid combination therapy.

Forecasted infliximab concentrations during induction predict time to remission and sustained disease control of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) exposure is established as a predictive factor of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and expert consensus is to achieve adequate exposure during induction to achieve and sustain remission. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the performance of a Bayesian PK tool in IBD patients starting IFX. Trough IFX serum levels collected immediately before the third (at week 6) and fourth (at week 14) infusions were evaluated from 307 IBD patients (median age=17 years, 50 % females, 83 % with Crohn's disease). Forecasted IFX concentration at the fourth infusion were estimated using serum IFX, antibodies to IFX, albumin and weight determined immediately before the third infusion using population PK calculator with Bayesian prior. The outcome variable was a clinical & biochemical remission status achieved (CRP levels below 3 mg/L in presence of clinical remission). Statistics consisted of Kaplan Meier analysis with calculation of Hazard ratio (HR), and logistic regression. RESULTS: IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL immediately before the third infusion associated with shorter time to clinical & biochemical remission than concentration below 15 µg/mL without reaching significance (163±14 days vs 200±16 days, respectively; p=0.052). However, using PK parameters at the third infusion, forecasted IFX concentrations above 10 µg/mL immediately before the fourth infusion were significantly associated with a higher rate (HR=1.6 95 %CI: 1.1 to 2.1 p<0.01) and shorter time to remission (148±18 days vs 200±13 days p<0.01). In the presence of IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL at the third infusion, there was a significant 2.5-fold higher likelihood of sustained clinical & biochemical remission status during maintenance as compared to IFX concentrations below 15 µg/mL (p<0.01). Forecasted IFX level above 10 µg/mL at fourth infusion associated with significantly 3.9-fold higher likelihood of clinical & biochemical remission as compared to forecasted IFX concentrations below 10 µg/mL (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data further support that optimized IFX concentrations during induction are associated with enhanced disease control in IBD.

Simulated cost-effectiveness of a novel precision-guided dosing strategy in adult patients with Crohn's disease initiating infliximab maintenance therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who lose response to biologics experience reduced quality of life (QoL) and costly hospitalizations. Precision-guided dosing (PGD) provides a comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that allows for biologic dosing to be personalized. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) PGD relative to two other dose intensification strategies (DIS). METHODS: We developed a hybrid (Markov and decision tree) model of patients with CD who had a clinical response to IFX induction. The analysis had a US payer perspective, a base case time horizon of 5 years, and a 4-week cycle length. There were three IFX dosing comparators: PGD; dose intensification based on symptoms, inflammatory markers, and trough IFX concentration (DIS1); and dose intensification based on symptoms alone (DIS2). Patients that failed IFX initiated ustekinumab, followed by vedolizumab, and conventional therapy. Transition probabilities for IFX were estimated from real-world clinical PK data and interventional clinical trial patient-level data. All other transition probabilities were derived from published randomized clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. Utility values were sourced from previous health technology assessments. Direct costs included biologic acquisition and infusion, surgeries and procedures, conventional therapy, and lab testing. The primary outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The robustness of results was assessed via one-way sensitivity, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: PGD was the cost-effective IFX dosing strategy with an ICER of 122,932 $ per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) relative to DIS1 and dominating DIS2. PGD had the lowest percentage (1.1%) of patients requiring a new biologic through 5 years (8.9% and 74.4% for DIS1 and DIS2, respectively). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of PGD was most sensitive to the time between IFX doses. PSA demonstrated that joint parameter uncertainty had moderate impact on some results. CONCLUSIONS: PGD provides clinical and QoL benefits by maintaining remission and avoiding IFX failure; it is the most cost-effective under conservative assumptions.

A Practical guide to selecting and using new Crohn's disease therapies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review details the three new agents, including two novel mechanisms of action, approved to treat Crohn's disease in recent years. We review efficacy, safety, prescribing information, and available data on positioning these new therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Risankizumab and upadacitinib are novel mechanisms of action approved to treat moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Risankizumab targets the cytokine interleukin-23. Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor approved for use in individuals who have previously failed or are intolerant to an anti-TNF agent. Subcutaneous infliximab provides a novel method of administering maintenance dosing of a longstanding and efficacious therapy. SUMMARY: Risankizumab has shown efficacy in both biologic naïve and biologic experienced populations. The SEQUENCE trial shows superiority of risankizumab over ustekinumab for disease response in patients who have previously failed an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent. Upadacitinib has shown good efficacy in clinical trials even in the setting of a mandated steroid taper during induction. Subcutaneous infliximab maintenance therapy appears noninferior to i.v. infliximab and shows good treatment persistence in real world transitions. Additional data is needed to better understand how to position these therapies.

Performance of Eight Infliximab Population Pharmacokinetic Models in a Cohort of Dutch Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Efficacy of infliximab in children with inflammatory bowel disease can be enhanced when serum concentrations are measured and further dosing is adjusted to achieve and maintain a target concentration. Use of a population pharmacokinetic model may help to predict an individual's infliximab dose requirement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of available infliximab population pharmacokinetic models in an independent cohort of Dutch children with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we used data of 70 children with inflammatory bowel disease (443 infliximab concentrations) to evaluate eight models that focused on infliximab pharmacokinetic models in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease, preferably aged ≤ 18 years. Predictive performance was evaluated with prior predictions (based solely on patient-specific covariates) and posterior predictions (based on covariates and infliximab trough concentrations). Model accuracy and precision were calculated with relative bias and relative root mean square error and we determined the classification accuracy at the trough concentration target of ≥ 5 mg/L. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic model by Fasanmade was identified to be most appropriate for the total dataset (relative bias before/after therapeutic drug monitoring: -20.7%/11.2% and relative root mean square error before/after therapeutic drug monitoring: 84.1%/51.6%), although differences between models were small and several were deemed suitable for clinical use. For the Fasanmade model, sensitivity and specificity for maximum posterior predictions for the next infliximab trough concentration to be ≥ 5 mg/L were respectively 83.5% and 80% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.870. CONCLUSIONS: In our paediatric cohort, various models provided acceptable predictive performance, with the Fasanmade model deemed most suitable for clinical use. Model-informed precision dosing can therefore be expected to help to maintain infliximab trough concentrations in the target range.

Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). AIMS: This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC. METHODS: Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90-18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94-15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63-14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.

Infliximab desensitization in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a safe therapeutic alternative.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to the administration of infliximab (IFX) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) patients are not rare and usually lead to drug discontinuation. We report data on safety and effectiveness of desensitization to IFX in patients with previous HSR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study. Patients for whom a desensitization protocol to IFX was realized after a previous HSR were included. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and IFX trough levels at both inclusion and six months after desensitization were collected. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence of HSR were evaluated. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2020, 27 patients (Crohn's Disease: 26 (96%) were included). Desensitization after HSR was performed after a median time of 10.4 months (2.9-33.1). Nineteen (70%) patients received immunosuppressants at time of desensitization. Eight (30%) patients presented HSR at first (n = 2), second (n = 4) or third (n = 2) IFX perfusion after desensitization. None led to intensive care unit transfer or death. Thirteen (48%) had clinical response at 6 months and 8 (29%) were still under IFX treatment two years after desensitization. IFX trough levels and ADA were available for 14 patients at time of desensitization. Most patients (12 out of 14) had ADA at a high level. At 6 months, among the 7 patients with long term response to IFX, 4 presented a decrease of ADA titers and 2 had a significant trough level of IFX. CONCLUSION: IFX desensitization in patients with IBD is a safe therapeutic alternative and represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics.What is already known? Hypersensitivity reactions to the administration of infliximab is frequent. Occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction, either immediate or delayed, usually leads to permanent drug discontinuation.What is new here? Infliximab desensitization is well tolerated with no hypersensitivity reaction recurrence in 70% of patients. Clinical success at 6 months was of 48% and around a third of patients remained under infliximab therapy two years after desensitization. Antidrug antibodies decreased and infliximab trough levels increased in these patients showing the impact of desensitization on immunogenicity.How can this study help patient care? Infliximab desensitization represents a potential option for patients refractory to multiple biologics who presented hypersensitivity reaction to the drug.

Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: impact on trough levels, day hospital visits, and medical expenses.

OBJECTIVE: Subcutaneous (SC) infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) have recently become available. We aimed to examine the impact of switching from intravenous (IV) to SC IFX and VDZ in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on costs, the day hospital burden, trough levels, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Our study comprised the cohort of IBD patients receiving IV IFX or VDZ at our hospital in 2022. We evaluated costs, day hospital visits, trough levels, biochemical markers, relapse rates, and self-report outcomes until Jun 30th 2023. RESULTS: Of 114 patients, 18 continued IV therapy, 80 were switched to SC therapy, and 16 were inductions. Eighty-eight (90%) remained in steroid-free remission with no difference between the IV or SC groups. The mean IFX trough level changed from 8.2 ± 4.5 µg/ml to 14.5 ± 5.9 µg/ml, p < 0.001, and the VDZ trough level from 14.7 ± 7.1 mg/ml to 26.5 ± 13.8 mg/ml, p < 0.001. The average yearly costs of infusions and injections per patient were 2 580 € and 7 482 € for IFX and 15 990 € and 13 101 € for VDZ. The annual reduction of day hospital visits was 6,9 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: IV and SC IFX and VDZ are equally effective in maintaining remission in IBD, but SC administration reduces day hospital visits and results in higher trough levels. SC VDZ is less and SC IFX more expensive than IV therapy. Further studies are needed to assess optimal dosing and separate trough levels for SC therapy.

Impact of proactive of infliximab monitoring using the Bayesian approach in the maintenance phase in patients with inflammatory bowel disease / Impacto de la monitorización proactiva de infliximab en fase de mantenimiento mediante estimación bayesiana en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Background and objectives: There is increasing evidence that proactive monitoring is useful in improving the control of inflammatory bowel disease, although it remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of proactive TDM based on the Bayesian approach to optimise the IFX dose compared with the standard of care dosing in patients with IBD. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients>18 years. Patients were classified into two groups according to the strategy used to optimise the dose of IFX: a standard therapy group (ST-group) with clinically based dose adjustment and therapeutic drug monitoring group (TDM-group), with estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters calculated by Bayesian prediction. Results: A total of 153 patients were included. Of these, 75 were in the TDM-group. Clinical response at week 52 was evaluated in 114 patients. The proportion of patients who achieved clinical remission was higher in the TDM than in the ST-group (80.7% vs 61.4%, respectively, p=0.023). A total of 28 patients (24.6%) met the parameters for the composite variable ‘poor clinical outcome’ at week 52. The proportion of patients who reached this outcome was lower in the TDM-group than in the ST-group (12.3% vs 36.8%, respectively, p=0.002). Conclusions: Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring using Bayesian approach is associated with higher secondary response and fewer long-term complications.(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: Cada vez hay más evidencia de que la monitorización proactiva es útil para mejorar el control de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII), aunque sigue siendo controvertida. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia de la monitorización de fármacos terapéuticos (TDM) proactiva basada en el enfoque bayesiano en comparación con el manejo estándar en pacientes con EII. Métodos: Cohorte observacional retrospectiva de pacientes con EEI > 18 años. Los pacientes se clasificaron en dos grupos de acuerdo con la estrategia utilizada para optimizar la dosis de infliximab (IFX): un grupo de terapia estándar (grupo-ST) con ajuste de dosis basado en la clínica y un grupo de monitorización terapéutica del fármaco (grupo-TDM), con estimación de parámetros farmacocinéticos calculados mediante estimación bayesiana. Resultados: Se incluyeron un total de 153 pacientes. De estos, 75 estaban en el grupo-TDM. La respuesta clínica en la semana 52 se evaluó en 114 pacientes. La proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron la remisión clínica fue mayor en el grupo-TDM que en el grupo-ST (80,7 vs. 61,4%, respectivamente, p = 0,023). Un total de 28 pacientes (24,6%) cumplieron los parámetros de la variable compuesta «resultado clínico deficiente» en la semana 52. La proporción de pacientes que alcanzaron este resultado fue menor en el grupo-TDM que en el grupo-ST (12,3 vs. 36,8%, respectivamente, p = 0,002). Conclusiones: La TDM proactiva mediante el enfoque bayesiano se asocia con una mayor respuesta secundaria y menos complicaciones a largo plazo.(AU)

Infliximab for anoperineal lesions in Crohn's disease: remission appears to be based on rapid combination therapy at high doses

Study Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare in real life the characteristics of treatment with infliximab according to the presence or absence of anoperineal involvement in Crohn's disease. Methods: We performed a single-center, prospective, non-interventional study, on patients with Crohn's disease in remission who had been treated with infliximab for at least 1 year. Patients with poor treatment compliance, on antibiotics, or those with a stoma were excluded. Results: We included 52 patients in this study: 34 with anoperineal lesions with or without luminal lesions, and 18 with luminal lesions only. Patients with anoperineal lesions were more likely to have undergone surgery (70.6% versus 38.9%, p = 0.027), had a shorter median time to infliximab treatment initiation (0.5 versus 5.5 years, p = 0.005), a higher mean dose of infliximab (6.6 versus 5.1 mg/kg, p = 0.015), and were more likely to receive combination treatments including infliximab (52.9% versus 11.1%, p = 0.008) than patients with luminal involvement only. Conclusions In our study, infliximab treatment was initiated more quickly, at higher doses, and more in combination therapy for anoperineal Crohn's disease than for luminal damage alone. Additional studies are required to confirm this finding and to assess the tolerance of this treatment throughout patient management. (AU)

The effect of infliximab dose escalation in inflammatory bowel disease patients with antibodies to infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab dose escalation (DE) can be used in inflammatory bowel disease patient; however, the long-term benefit remains unclear, especially in those with antibodies to infliximab (ATI). The aim was to assess the effect of DE in patients with ATI on drug level, clinical response and ATI status. METHODS: All patients undergoing infliximab DE (a reduction in dose interval between infusions <8 weeks ± an increase in dose up to 10 mg/kg) at a referral centre between April 2016 and August 2019 were included. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were DE: 51 were men, 50 had CD and 63 were receiving immunosuppression. A total of 87 people received DE for a median of 44 weeks (range 4-176). Five stopped infliximab after 1 dose of DE: 2 for loss of response and 3 for infusion reaction. In patients with ATI ≤10 vs. >10 AU/mL, DE significantly increased drug levels: median infliximab levels of 1.4 and 0.9 at baseline, respectively, to 3.2 and 3.5 at week 24. After DE, 21/35 ATI-positive patients had a fall in ATI ≤10 AU/mL. At week 24 following DE 62/92 patients were in clinical remission. Duration of clinical remission was shorter in those with ATI >10 AU/mL (median 24 weeks, range 0-88) than in those with transient/ATI ≤10 AU/mL (median 36 weeks, range 0-126, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of DE for selected patients receiving infliximab is associated with an increase in drug levels and reduced ATI positivity. This is associated with clinical remission in approximately 70% of patients at 6 months.

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pneumonia patient treated with two doses of infliximab within 2 weeks for acute severe ulcerative colitis: A case report.

RATIONALE: The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has caused severe acute respiratory syndrome, posing a significant challenge for patients receiving immunotherapy for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. As of January 2022, immunosuppressants such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNFα) and azathioprine are inadvisable for an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19). We continued infliximab as a second induction dose nine days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms in a patient with acute severe ulcerative colitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 34-year-old male with 6 to 8 times bloody diarrhea, fever, and cramping abdominal pain. Ulcerative colitis was diagnosed 6 months earlier and treated with mesalamine 80 mg/kg/day and azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day. The patient had never undergone surgery before. Sigmoidoscopy revealed multiple ulcerations and spontaneous bleeding, and the colon samples tested negative for cytomegalovirus and Clostridium difficile. However, intravenous corticosteroids did not induce remission. A nasopharyngeal swab tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. DIAGNOSIS: Acute severe ulcerative colitis and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: The second loading dose of infliximab was administered nine days after the diagnosis of COVID-19. OUTCOME: The patient completed infliximab induction at a dose of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with no complications. LESSONS: It is unclear whether anti-TNF-α treatment improves or deteriorates COVID-19 patient outcomes, and this case demonstrates that infliximab can be used safely. Current guidelines make a weak recommendation to avoid using anti-TNFα agents in the presence of acute COVID-19 infection. There is an urgent need for research on biologics therapy.

Lymphoma in Pediatric-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Infliximab Monotherapy: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are often treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) medications. Concomitant treatment of IBD with anti-TNFα agents and immunomodulators appears to be associated with an increased risk for lymphoma. METHODS: Patients who developed lymphoma while on monotherapy with an anti-TNFα agent were identified at three centers. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. RESULTS: Five adolescents and young adult patients with pediatric-onset IBD who were treated with infliximab (IFX) without exposure to thiopurines were subsequently diagnosed with lymphoma. Three of the five patients had bone involvement at presentation. Epstein-Barr virus was positive in 2 cases. Median time from diagnosis of IBD and exposure to IFX prior to diagnosis of lymphoma was 5 and 4.3 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This case series reports long-term follow-up for young patients with IBD who were treated with IFX monotherapy and developed lymphoma. Three of the five patients had bone involvement. In general, the risk of lymphoma following exposure to anti-TNFα medications alone remains low, but the incidence of primary bone lymphomas in IBD has not been reported. Studies examining longer exposure times may be needed to determine the true lymphoma risk in patients treated with IFX monotherapy.

Serum oncostatin M is a potential biomarker of disease activity and infliximab response in inflammatory bowel disease measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Although endoscopy is the gold standard to assess disease activity and infliximab efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the invasive, costly, and time-consuming procedure limits its routine applications. We aimed to investigate the clinical value of serum oncostatin M (OSM) as a surrogate biomarker. METHODS: Fifty healthy controls, 34 non-IBD patients, and 189 IBD patients who were pre-infliximab treatment (n = 122) or in infliximab maintenance (n = 67) were enrolled. A chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) was constructed to quantify serum OSM concentrations. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the performance of blood biomarkers for IBD management. RESULTS: The methodology of CLIA exhibited great analytical performance with a wide linear range of 31.25-25000 pg/mL, a low detection limit of 23.2 pg/mL, acceptable precision, and applicable accuracy. Patients with IBD (121.5 [43.3-249.4] pg/mL, p < 0.001) and non-IBD (72.4 [51.4-129.6] pg/mL, p = 0.005) had higher serum OSM levels than healthy controls (35.8 [23.2-56.4] pg/mL). In the analysis of clinical and endoscopic activity, serum OSM levels were elevated in moderate and severe patients compared to those in remission. IBD patients without mucosal healing had higher serum OSM levels than those with mucosal healing (AUC = 0.843). Besides, serum OSM levels were increased in clinical non-responders (287.3 [127.9-438] pg/mL) compared to responders (24.1 [23.2-53.4] pg/mL, p < 0.001), and showed great recognition ability with an AUC of 0.898. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed methodology of CLIA had great potential for use in the clinic. Elevated serum OSM expression was a promising biomarker of severe disease and infliximab non-response in IBD patients.

De-escalation from Dose-Intensified Anti-TNF Therapy Is Successful in the Majority of IBD Patients at 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate. AIMS: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success. METHODS: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission.