Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.938
Filter
1.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1222, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza epidemics have a substantial public health and economic burden, which can be alleviated through vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a 75% vaccination coverage rate (VCR) in: older adults (aged ≥ 65 years), individuals with chronic conditions, pregnant women, children aged 6-24 months and healthcare workers. However, no European country achieves this target in all risk groups. In this study, potential public health and economic benefits achieved by reaching 75% influenza VCR was estimated in risk groups across four European countries: France, Italy, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: A static epidemiological model was used to estimate the averted public health and economic burden of increasing the 2021/2022 season VCR to 75%, using the efficacy data of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine. For each country and risk group, the most recent data on population size, VCR, pre-pandemic influenza epidemiology, direct medical costs and absenteeism were identified through a systematic literature review, supplemented by manual searching. Outcomes were: averted influenza cases, general practitioner (GP) visits, hospitalisations, case fatalities, number of days of work lost, direct medical costs and absenteeism-related costs. RESULTS: As of the 2021/2022 season, the UK achieved the highest weighted VCR across risk groups (65%), followed by Spain (47%), France (44%) and Italy (44%). Based on modelling, the 2021/2022 VCR prevented an estimated 1.9 million influenza cases, avoiding 375,200 GP visits, 73,200 hospitalisations and 38,400 deaths. To achieve the WHO 75% VCR target, an additional 24 million at-risk individuals would need to be vaccinated, most of which being older adults and patients with chronic conditions. It was estimated that this could avoid a further 918,200 influenza cases, 332,000 GP visits, 16,300 hospitalisations and 6,300 deaths across the four countries, with older adults accounting for 52% of hospitalisations and 80% of deaths. An additional €84 million in direct medical costs and €79 million in absenteeism costs would be saved in total, with most economic benefits delivered in France. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults represent most vaccine-preventable influenza cases and deaths, followed by individuals with chronic conditions. Health authorities should prioritise vaccinating these populations for maximum public health and economic benefits.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Public Health , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/economics , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Aged , Female , Public Health/economics , Adult , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , France/epidemiology , Male , Seasons , Adolescent , Infant , Europe/epidemiology , Young Adult , Child , Pregnancy , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/economics
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 404, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the elderly is limited, and results are controversial. There are also few reports from China. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study design to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated visits among elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) across four influenza seasons in Ningbo, China, from 2018 to 19 to 2021-22. Influenza-positive cases and negative controls were randomly matched in a 1:1 ratio according to age, sex, hospital, and date of influenza testing. We used logistic regression models to compare vaccination odds ratios (ORs) in cases to controls. We calculated the VE as [100% × (1-adjusted OR)] and calculated the 95% confidence interval (CI) around the estimate. RESULTS: A total of 30,630 elderly patients tested for influenza with virus nucleic acid or antigen during the study period. After exclusions, we included 1 825 influenza-positive cases and 1 825 influenza-negative controls. Overall, the adjusted VE for influenza-related visits was 63.5% (95% CI, 56.3-69.5%), but varied by season. Influenza VE was 59.8% (95% CI, 51.5-66.7%) for influenza A and 89.6% (95% CI, 77.1-95.3%) for influenza B. The VE for ages 60-69 and 70-79 was 65.2% (95% CI, 55.4-72.9%) and 69.8% (95% CI, 58.7-77.9%), respectively, but only 45.4% (95% CI, 6.2-68.2%) for ages 80 and over. CONCLUSIONS: Standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine has shown good protection in the elderly in China. However, protection may not be satisfactory in people aged 80 years and older.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccine Efficacy , Vaccines, Inactivated , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Aged , Male , Female , China/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , East Asian People
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2347019, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807261

ABSTRACT

Influenza A viruses pose a significant threat to global health, impacting both humans and animals. Zoonotic transmission, particularly from swine and avian species, is the primary source of human influenza outbreaks. Notably, avian influenza viruses of the H5N1, H7N9, and H9N2 subtypes are of pandemic concern through their global spread and sporadic human infections. Preventing and controlling these viruses is critical due to their high threat level. Vaccination remains the most effective strategy for influenza prevention and control in humans, despite varying vaccine efficacy across strains. This review focuses specifically on pandemic preparedness for avian influenza viruses. We delve into vaccines tested in animal models and summarize clinical trials conducted on H5N1, H7N9, and H9N2 vaccines in humans.


Subject(s)
Birds , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza in Birds , Influenza, Human , Pandemics , Animals , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Vaccine Development , Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/immunology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Models, Animal , Vaccination , Pandemic Preparedness
6.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13284, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We report 2023/2024 season interim influenza vaccine effectiveness for three studies, namely, primary care in Great Britain, hospital settings in Scotland and hospital settings in England. METHODS: A test negative design was used to estimate vaccine effectiveness. RESULTS: Estimated vaccine effectiveness against all influenzas ranged from 63% (95% confidence interval 46 to 75%) to 65% (41 to 79%) among children aged 2-17, from 36% (20 to 49%) to 55% (43 to 65%) among adults 18-64 and from 40% (29 to 50%) to 55% (32 to 70%) among adults aged 65 and over. CONCLUSIONS: During a period of co-circulation of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) in the United Kingdom, evidence for effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in both children and adults was found.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Primary Health Care , Secondary Care , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Middle Aged , Young Adult , United Kingdom , Aged , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Male , Female , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Seasons , Vaccine Efficacy , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2352916, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744298

ABSTRACT

Healthcare providers (HCPs) are recommended for priority influenza vaccination due to their high risk of contracting influenza. HCPs greatly aid in targeted population immunization campaigns. Therefore, understanding the factors that influence HCPs' decisions to get vaccinated and to recommend influenza vaccination is essential. However, there currently needs to be more evidence on this topic in China. Qualitative interviews using a semi-structured interview method were conducted with 180 HCPs from urban community hospitals and town hospitals in four cities in Shandong Province during August 2023. The interview content was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify the variables impacting the vaccination and recommendation practices of HCPs, as well as their suggestions for improving vaccination services. The results will help support the future development of precise intervention measures as well as focused education and training.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Qualitative Research , Vaccination , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , China , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Female , Male , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Interviews as Topic , Immunization Programs , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology
9.
Ital J Pediatr ; 50(1): 97, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Italy, since the 2020-2021 flu season, the flu vaccine recommendation was extended to all children aged 6 months to 6 years and quadrivalent Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (qLAIV) was introduced. Since school-aged children are important carriers of annual influenza epidemics, a school-based influenza vaccination program may potentially increase vaccine uptake. Recent studies, conducted in the UK and the US, show that school-based vaccination can reach higher percentage of paediatric vaccination coverage compared to children vaccinated in other settings. METHODS: During 2022-2023 flu season in 9 preschools located in Milan healthcare personnel vaccinated children with qLAIV at the end of a school day. A Google Form questionnaire was administered to preschoolers' parents of all preschools within the Municipality of Milan. RESULTS: In the preschools engaged in the vaccination program, 233 out of 1939 children were vaccinated (12%). Among these, 61 (26.2%) had never been vaccinated for influenza before. Vaccination coverage was 11.5% for Italian children and 14.3% for children coming from an immigrant background. We collected 3659 questionnaire responses, divided according to study participation status (371 from preschools that participated in the vaccination program and 3288 from other preschools in Milan). 57% of the families who answered to the questionnaire vaccinated their children for flu. qLAIV accounted for 85.6% of vaccinations. We observed a statistically significant difference in the percentage of vaccinated children between those attending a school participating in the project (67.9%) and children attending other schools (56%) (p < 0.001). Vaccination was administered by family pediatricians (48.9%), in vaccination centers (34.8%), in vaccine hubs (11.3%), in schools (2.6%), by private pediatricians (1.6%) and in other settings (0.7%). Focusing on the responses from families whose children attend schools participating in the vaccination program, 21.8% stated that the vaccination was provided in school. CONCLUSION: According to our experience, in Italy, at the moment, only the cooperation between health providers and alternative settings, including schools, may expand flu vaccination coverage. In particular, schools are to be considered a place to inform and reach out to families, useful to increase vaccination coverage.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccines, Attenuated , Humans , Italy , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Child, Preschool , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Female , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Child , School Health Services , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Programs , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Seasons
10.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2346966, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741240

ABSTRACT

This research examines the low rate of co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines among seniors aged 65 and older in Korea, despite recommendations from authorities and academia worldwide. The study aimed to understand the influence of general characteristics and health beliefs on the vaccination choices of seniors, who were categorized into four groups based on their vaccination status: influenza only, COVID-19 only, both, or neither. A total of 400 participants, aged 65 and above, were selected through proportional stratified random sampling from five major Korean regions for a survey conducted between November 24th and December 15th, 2023. The results indicated no significant differences in general characteristics across these groups. However, regarding the health beliefs showed significant differences in perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy between the influenza-only and co-administration groups. Higher levels of perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy were associated with choosing co-administration. Contrary to previous studies focusing on safety concerns as a primary factor in vaccine hesitancy, this study highlights the role of individual health-related beliefs, particularly perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy, as critical in influencing the decision for co-administration among the elderly in Korea.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Humans , Aged , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Republic of Korea , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Aged, 80 and over , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Surveys and Questionnaires , Self Efficacy , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Decision Making
11.
Age Ageing ; 53(Supplement_2): ii70-ii79, 2024 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745493

ABSTRACT

This systematic review evaluated the impact of oral probiotics on the immune response to vaccination in older people. A literature search was performed in three electronic databases up to January 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in older people (age ≥ 60 years) investigating oral probiotics and vaccine response outcomes were included. Characteristics and outcome data of the included studies were extracted and analysed and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials. Ten RCTs involving 1,560 participants, reported in 9 papers, were included. Nine studies involved the seasonal influenza vaccine and one a COVID-19 vaccine. All studies used lactobacilli, some in combination with bifidobacteria. Studies reported outcomes including anti-vaccine antibody titres or concentrations, seroconversion and seroprotection. When comparing antibody titres, seroprotection rate and seroconversion rate between probiotic and placebo groups expressed as a response ratio, the weighted mean values were 1.29, 1.16 and 2.00, respectively. Meta-analysis showed that probiotics increase seroconversion rates to all three strains of the seasonal influenza vaccine: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.74 (1.31, 5.70; P = 0.007) for the H1N1 strain; 1.90 (1.04, 3.44; P = 0.04) for the H3N2 strain; 1.72 (1.05, 2.80; P = 0.03) for the B strain. There was a low level of heterogeneity in these findings. Several studies were at high risk of bias due to missing outcome data. Lactobacilli may improve the vaccine response, but further research is needed to be more certain of this.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Probiotics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Aged , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Administration, Oral , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Middle Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology
12.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249531, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696165

ABSTRACT

Importance: Pregnancy represents a window of opportunity for vaccination due to established maternal and fetal benefits of vaccination. Little is known about receipt of routinely recommended vaccines in pregnancy, specifically tetanus, diphtheria, plus acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza, among pregnant people living with HIV (PLHIV). Objective: To estimate prevalence of vaccination receipt among pregnant people with HIV (PLHIV) and identify demographic and clinical characteristics associated with vaccination. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study included women participating in Women's Health Study (WHS) of the Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities (SMARTT) Study of the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study. The network has been enrolling pregnant PLHIV at 22 US sites since 2007. Participants for this study enrolled between December 2017 and July 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022. Exposure: Data on vaccination in pregnancy were collected through medical record abstraction. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vaccination receipt was defined as Tdap vaccination received at less than 36 weeks' gestation and influenza vaccination at any gestational age, based on current guidelines. Log-binomial and modified Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equations were fit to identify factors associated with successful receipt of (1) Tdap, (2) influenza, and (3) both vaccinations. Results: A total of 310 pregnancies among 278 people participating in the WHS were included (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [6.1] years; 220 [71%] Black, 77 [25%] Hispanic, and 77 [25%] race and ethnicity other than Black; 64 [21%] with perinatally acquired HIV). Less than one-third of pregnancies were vaccinated as recommended (Tdap, 32.6% [95% CI, 27.4%-38.1%]; influenza, 31.6% [95% CI, 26.5%-37.1%]; both, 22.6% [95% CI, 18.0%-27.6%]). People living with perinatally acquired HIV, those who did not identify as Black, or those who were multiparous had adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) less than 1, while older PLHIV had aRRs greater than 1, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (perinatally acquired HIV: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; race other than Black: aRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.26-1.08; multiparous: aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-1.00; age 24-29 years: aRR, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.92-4.48). Conclusions and Relevance: In this diverse, multicenter cohort of pregnant PLHIV, receipt of recommended vaccinations was low. Identifying and addressing barriers to vaccination receipt is urgently needed for pregnant people with HIV.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines , HIV Infections , Influenza Vaccines , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Vaccination , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , HIV Infections/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Young Adult
13.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1213, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk factors of infant mortality in Africa and south Asian countries have been broadly discussed. However, infant morbidity is largely underestimated. We analyzed the data from a randomized vaccine trial in Bangladesh to identify and assess the effect of risk factors on infant morbidity. METHODS: Pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive either inactivated influenza vaccine or pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and the infants were randomly assigned to receive 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or Hib conjugate vaccine at week 6, 10 and 14. The data were collected from August 2004 through December 2005. Each pair of infant and mother were followed for 24 weeks after birth with weekly visits. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) for repeated measurements and Poisson regression models were used to identify the risk factors and evaluate their effect on the longitudinal incidence and total number of episodes of respiratory illness with fever (RIF), diarrhea disease, ear problem and pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 340 pregnant women were randomized with mean age of 25 years. The baseline mother and infant characteristics were similar between two treatment groups. Exclusive breastfeeding and higher paternal education level were common factors associated with lower infant morbidity of RIF (adjusted OR = 0.40 and 0.94 with p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively), diarrhea disease (adjusted OR = 0.39 and 0.95 with p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively), and ear problem (adjusted OR = 0.20 and 0.76 with p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Maternal influenza vaccine significantly reduced the incidence of RIF (adjusted OR = 0.54; p < 0.01) but not diarrhea disease or ear problem (p > 0.05). Female infants had lower incidence of diarrhea disease (adjusted OR = 0.67; p = 0.01) and ear problem (adjusted OR = 0.12; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal influenza vaccination, exclusive breastfeeding, female children, and higher paternal education level significantly reduced the infant morbidity within the 24 weeks after birth in Bangladesh.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Humans , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Infant, Newborn , Young Adult , Morbidity , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Male
14.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13295, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2022/23 influenza season in the United Kingdom saw the return of influenza to prepandemic levels following two seasons with low influenza activity. The early season was dominated by A(H3N2), with cocirculation of A(H1N1), reaching a peak late December 2022, while influenza B circulated at low levels during the latter part of the season. From September to March 2022/23, influenza vaccines were offered, free of charge, to all aged 2-13 (and 14-15 in Scotland and Wales), adults up to 49 years of age with clinical risk conditions and adults aged 50 and above across the mainland United Kingdom. METHODS: End-of-season adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates against sentinel primary-care attendance for influenza-like illness, where influenza infection was laboratory confirmed, were calculated using the test negative design, adjusting for potential confounders. METHODS: Results In the mainland United Kingdom, end-of-season VE against all laboratory-confirmed influenza for all those > 65 years of age, most of whom received adjuvanted quadrivalent vaccines, was 30% (95% CI: -6% to 54%). VE for those aged 18-64, who largely received cell-based vaccines, was 47% (95% CI: 37%-56%). Overall VE for 2-17 year olds, predominantly receiving live attenuated vaccines, was 66% (95% CI: 53%-76%). CONCLUSION: The paper provides evidence of moderate influenza VE in 2022/23.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza B virus , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Primary Health Care , Vaccine Efficacy , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Adult , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Aged , Young Adult , Child , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Seasons , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
15.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 165, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750446

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Performing cardiovascular and cancer screenings in target populations can reduce mortality. Visiting a General Practitioner (GP) once a year is related to an increased likelihood of preventive care. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of visiting a GP in the last year on the delivery of preventive services based on sex and household income. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using data collected from the European Health Interview Survey 2013-2015 of individuals aged 40-74 years from 29 European countries. The variables included: sociodemographic factors (age, sex, and household income (HHI) quintiles [HHI 1: lowest income, HHI 5: more affluent]), lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and preventive care services (cardiometabolic, influenza vaccination, and cancer screening). Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses and multilevel models (level 1: citizen, level 2: country) were performed. RESULTS: 242,212 subjects were included, 53.7% were female. The proportion of subjects who received any cardiometabolic screening (92.4%) was greater than cancer screening (colorectal cancer: 44.1%, gynaecologic cancer: 40.0%) and influenza vaccination. Individuals who visited a GP in the last year were more prone to receive preventive care services (cardiometabolic screening: adjusted OR (aOR): 7.78, 95% CI: 7.43-8.15; colorectal screening aOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.80-1.95; mammography aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.69-1.83 and Pap smear test: aOR: 1.89, 95% CI:1.85-1.94). Among those who visited a GP in the last year, the highest ratios of cardiometabolic screening and cancer screening benefited those who were more affluent. Women underwent more blood pressure measurements than men regardless of the HHI. Men were more likely to undergo influenza vaccination than women regardless of the HHI. The highest differences between countries were observed for influenza vaccination, with a median odds ratio (MOR) of 6.36 (under 65 years with comorbidities) and 4.30 (over 65 years with comorbidities), followed by colorectal cancer screening with an MOR of 2.26. CONCLUSIONS: Greater adherence to preventive services was linked to individuals who had visited a GP at least once in the past year. Disparities were evident among those with lower household incomes who visited a GP. The most significant variability among countries was observed in influenza vaccination and colorectal cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Preventive Health Services , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Europe/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors
16.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1360556, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706547

ABSTRACT

Background: Diabetes affects millions of people worldwide, making them more vulnerable to infections, including seasonal influenza. It is therefore particularly important for those suffering from diabetes to be vaccinated against influenza each year. However, influenza vaccination coverage remains low in this population. This review primarily aims to identify the determinants of influenza vaccination in people with diabetes (T1D or T2D). Secondly, it aims to assess main recommendations for influenza vaccination, vaccine effectiveness, vaccination coverage, and how education and pharmacists can encourage uptake of the vaccine in the diabetic population. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in January 2022 to systematically review evidence on influenza vaccination in people with diabetes using data from PubMed, Science Direct, and EM Premium with terms such as "Diabetes mellitus," "Immunization Programs," "Vaccination," and "Influenza Vaccines." Quality assessment and data extraction were independently conducted by two authors. Disagreements between the authors were resolved through discussion and consensus, and if necessary, by consulting a third author. Results: Of the 333 records identified, 55 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. Influenza vaccination was recommended for people ≥6 months. Despite effectiveness evidence showing a reduction in mortality and hospitalizations in people with diabetes vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated ones, very few studies reported a coverage rate ≥ 75%, which is WHO's target objective. Determinants such as advanced age, presence of comorbidities and healthcare givers' advice were associated with increased vaccination uptake. On the contrary, fear of adverse reactions and concerns about vaccine effectiveness were significant barriers. Finally, education and pharmacists' intervention played a key role in promoting vaccination and increasing vaccination uptake. Conclusion: Influenza vaccination coverage in people with diabetes remains low despite recommendations and evidence on vaccine effectiveness. Motivators and barriers as well as several socio-demographic and clinical factors have been identified to explain this trend. Efforts are now needed to increase the number of diabetics vaccinated against influenza, mainly through education and the involvement of healthcare givers.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccination Coverage , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10845, 2024 05 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736012

ABSTRACT

With growing recognition of the importance of community engagement in addressing public health challenges, its role in promoting healthy behaviors and preventing infectious diseases has gained attention. However, vaccination coverage remains a significant concern in many developing countries. While previous studies have linked community engagement to positive health outcomes, there is a gap in understanding its influence on individual vaccination choices, particularly in the context of developing countries. Utilizing data from the 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this study examines the impact of community engagement on COVID-19 and flu vaccination uptake among 7281 individuals. Community engagement, measured by community vaccination notifications, serves as the key independent variable. The study employs Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methods to analyze the relationship between community engagement and vaccination behavior. The analysis reveals a positive association between community engagement and vaccination rates. Specifically, individuals receiving notifications were more likely to get the COVID-19 vaccine compared to non-recipients (vaccination rates: 100% vs. 53.3%), and flu vaccination rates were also significantly higher among those notified (2.7% vs. 1.9%). Mechanism analysis suggests that individuals receiving community notifications are more aware of the benefits of vaccination, leading to higher vaccination rates among this group. This study underscores the effectiveness of community engagement strategies in promoting positive vaccination behavior among individuals in China. By enhancing awareness and trust in immunization, community engagement initiatives play a crucial role in shaping health behaviors and improving vaccination uptake. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating community engagement approaches into public health interventions to address vaccination challenges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Community Participation , Vaccination , Humans , China , Female , Male , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Young Adult , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2348124, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714332

ABSTRACT

South Korea's National Immunization Program administers the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) to manage seasonal influenza, with a particular focus on the elderly. After reviewing the safety and immune response triggered by the adjuvanted QIV (aQIV) in individuals aged 65 and older, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in Korea approved its use. However, the extensive impact of aQIV on public health is yet to be fully understood. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of replacing QIV with aQIV in South Korean adults aged 65 years and older. A dynamic transmission model, calibrated with national influenza data, was applied to compare the influence of aQIV and QIV on older adults and the broader population throughout a single influenza season. This study considered both the direct and indirect effects of vaccination on the elderly. We derived the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs incurred, validated through a probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 5,000 simulations. Findings suggest that transitioning to aQIV from QIV in the elderly would be cost-effective, particularly if aQIV's efficacy reaches or exceeds 56.1%. With an ICER of $29,267/QALY, considerably lower than the $34,998/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, aQIV presents as a cost-effective option. Thus, implementing aQIV with at least 56.1% efficacy is beneficial from both financial and public health perspectives in mitigating seasonal influenza in South Korea.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Republic of Korea , Aged , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/economics , Aged, 80 and over , Adjuvants, Immunologic/economics , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
19.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3404-3409, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Globally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and illness. Vaccine-preventable infections may increase acute coronary vascular disease events and the risk of complications. Low vaccine coverage has been reported among adults at high risk of complications from vaccine-preventable infections. There is a gap in research evidence around determinants of uptake of vaccines among adults with CVD. This study examined the uptake of influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccines and the determinants of uptake of the vaccines among cardiac patients. METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out among hospitalised cardiac patients through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate self-reported uptake of influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccines. Univariate and multivariate analyses of participants' social demographic and clinical characteristics were conducted to identify factors for receiving influenza vaccine. RESULTS: Low vaccination rates among 104 participants were found for influenza (45.2%), pneumococcal (13.5%) and zoster (5.8%) vaccines. The most common reason for not receiving influenza vaccine was concern about side effects. Lack of awareness about the pneumococcal and zoster vaccines was the main reason for the poor uptake of these vaccines. Australia-born participants were more likely to receive influenza vaccine than overseas-born participants. Working-age participants and, interestingly, people living with a current smoker were less likely to receive influenza vaccine. CONCLUSION: Influenza, pneumococcal and zoster vaccine uptake among cardiac patients was low. Encouraging physician recommendations for vaccination for cardiac patients under 65 years of age and addressing vaccination challenges among people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds and pharmacy, workplace, and hospital vaccination may help increase vaccination uptake among cardiac patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Herpes Zoster Vaccine , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Vaccination , Humans , Male , Female , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pneumococcal Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Aged , Prospective Studies , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/administration & dosage , Herpes Zoster Vaccine/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Australia/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over
20.
Vaccine ; 42(15): 3486-3492, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While safety of influenza vaccines is well-established, some studies have suggested potential associations between influenza vaccines and certain adverse events (AEs). This study examined the safety of the 2022-2023 influenza vaccines among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. METHODS: A self-controlled case series compared incidence rates of anaphylaxis, encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), and transverse myelitis following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations (i.e., any, high-dose or adjuvanted) in risk and control intervals among Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 65 years. We used conditional Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for event-dependent observation time and seasonality. Analyses also accounted for uncertainty from outcome misclassification where feasible. For AEs with any statistically significant associations, we stratified results by concomitant vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 12.7 million vaccine recipients, we observed 76 anaphylaxis, 276 encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, 134 GBS and 75 transverse myelitis cases. Only rates of anaphylaxis were elevated in risk compared to control intervals. With all adjustments, an elevated, but non-statistically significant, anaphylaxis rate was observed following any (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 0.96-6.03), high-dose (IRR: 2.31, 95% CI: 0.67-7.91), and adjuvanted (IRR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.71-15.08) influenza vaccination; anaphylaxis IRRs were 2.54 (95% CI: 0.49-13.05) and 1.64 (95% CI: 0.38-7.05) for persons with and without concomitant vaccination, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of encephalitis/encephalomyelitis, GBS, or transverse myelitis were not elevated following 2022-2023 seasonal influenza vaccinations among U.S. adults ≥ 65 years. There was an increased rate of anaphylaxis following influenza vaccination that may have been influenced by concomitant vaccination.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccination , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/epidemiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/chemically induced , Incidence , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Myelitis, Transverse/epidemiology , Myelitis, Transverse/etiology , Seasons , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...