Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34.529
Filter
1.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 35(1): 2350231, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754985

ABSTRACT

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of interferon (IFN) α-2a combined with phototherapy for early-stage MF.Methods: Thirteen patients with early-stage MF received subcutaneous injections of IFN α-2a at 3 million IU combined with phototherapy three times per week for 6 months. Treatment efficacy was measured by changes in body surface area (BSA) score and modified severity-weighted assessment tool (mSWAT) score at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Histopathologic examinations of skin lesions were performed before and after treatment.Results: After 3 months of treatment, all 13 patients achieved a partial response, and BSA and mSWAT scores were significantly lower than those at baseline (p < 0.001). After 6 months, BSA and mSWAT scores were significantly lower than those at baseline (p < 0.001) and after 3 months (p < 0.05). Eleven patients achieved complete remission and two patients achieved a partial response (overall response rate, 100%). Histopathologic examination showed a significant decrease in the number of atypical lymphocytes in both epidermis and dermis. No severe adverse effects occurred.Conclusion: IFN α-2a in combination with phototherapy may be an effective and safe alternative modality for early-stage MF.


Subject(s)
Interferon alpha-2 , Interferon-alpha , Mycosis Fungoides , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Mycosis Fungoides/therapy , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Prospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Interferon alpha-2/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interferon-alpha/administration & dosage , Interferon-alpha/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Phototherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasm Staging , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects
3.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(5): e13796, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712716

ABSTRACT

Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal solution could offer a non-invasive and user-friendly alternative. This two-part clinical study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dose proportionality of a novel apomorphine hydrochloride oromucosal solution, as well as its relative bioavailability to subcutaneous apomorphine injection and apomorphine sublingual film. In part A of the study, 12 patients with PD received 2 mg oromucosal apomorphine (4% weight/volume) and 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 4 and 8 mg oromucosal apomorphine. In part B of the study, 13 patients with PD received 7 mg oromucosal apomorphine (7% weight/volume) and 30 mg sublingual apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine. Washout between dose administrations in both study parts was at least 2 days. Safety, tolerability, and PK were assessed pre- and post-dose. Both study parts showed that oromucosal apomorphine was generally well-tolerated. Observed side effects were typical for apomorphine administration and included asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, yawning, fatigue, and somnolence. Oromucosal apomorphine exposure increased with dose, although less than dose proportional. The mean (SD) maximum exposure reached with 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine was 753.0 (298.6) ng*min/mL (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) and 8.0 (3.3) ng/mL (maximum plasma concentration). This was comparable to exposure reached after 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine and approximately half of the exposure observed with 30 mg sublingual apomorphine. In summary, clinically relevant plasma concentrations could be reached in PD patients without tolerability issues.


Subject(s)
Apomorphine , Parkinson Disease , Humans , Apomorphine/administration & dosage , Apomorphine/pharmacokinetics , Apomorphine/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Aged , Administration, Sublingual , Injections, Subcutaneous , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Administration, Oral , Biological Availability , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiparkinson Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies
4.
AAPS J ; 26(3): 60, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730115

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous (SC) administration of therapeutic proteins is perceived to pose higher risk of immunogenicity when compared with intravenous (IV) route of administration (RoA). However, systematic evaluations of clinical data to support this claim are lacking. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the immunogenicity of the same therapeutic protein by IV and SC RoA. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) data and controlling variables for 7 therapeutic proteins administered by both IV and SC routes across 48 treatment groups were analyzed. RoA was the primary independent variable of interest while therapeutic protein, patient population, adjusted dose, and number of ADA samples were controlling variables. Analysis of variance was used to compare the ADA incidence between IV and SC RoA, while accounting for controlling variables and potential interactions. Subsequently, 10 additional therapeutic proteins with ADA data published for both IV and SC administration were added to the above 7 therapeutic proteins and were evaluated for ADA incidence. RoA had no statistically significant effect on ADA incidence for the initial dataset of 7 therapeutic proteins (p = 0.55). The only variable with a significant effect on ADA incidence was the therapeutic protein. None of the other controlling variables, including their interactions with RoA, was significant. When all data from the 17 therapeutic proteins were pooled, there was no statistically significant effect of RoA on ADA incidence (p = 0.81). In conclusion, there is no significant difference in ADA incidence between the IV and SC RoA, based on analysis of clinical ADA data from 17 therapeutic proteins.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intravenous , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Antibodies/administration & dosage , Antibodies/immunology , Proteins/administration & dosage , Proteins/immunology
5.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(8): 3275-3286, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708486

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare two routes of administration and different dosages of streptozotocin (STZ) for the pharmacological induction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant CD1 females. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 35 female CD1 mice were divided into 5 groups (n = 7). Diabetes mellitus (DM) was induced with STZ by two routes and two doses: 1) Control Group without administration of STZ (CL), 2) Intraperitoneal Group with 200 mg of STZ/Kg of weight (IP200), 3) Intraperitoneal Group with 230 mg of STZ/Kg of weight (IP230), 4) Subcutaneous Group with 200 mg of STZ/Kg of weight (SC200) and 5) Subcutaneous Group with 230 mg of STZ/Kg of weight (SC230). Body weight, food and water intake, glycemia, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR), survival, and birth rate were identified. RESULTS: The SC230 group turned out to be the most effective dose and route for the induction of GDM in pregnant females. This scheme managed to reproduce sustained hyperglycemia with high HOMA-IR, the presence of polyphagia, polydipsia, and weight loss. In addition, the birth rate and survival were high compared to the other doses and routes of administration. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of a single dose of 230 mg/kg of weight by subcutaneous route supposes advantages compared to previously used models since it decreases the physiological stress due to manipulation and the costs since it does not require repeated doses or adjuvants such as high lipid diets to potentiate the diabetogenic effect of STZ. Graphical Abstract: https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Graphical-abstract-12.jpg.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental , Diabetes, Gestational , Streptozocin , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Mice , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/chemically induced , Streptozocin/administration & dosage , Injections, Subcutaneous , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Insulin Resistance , Body Weight/drug effects
6.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(5): e13832, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769747

ABSTRACT

Olamkicept selectively inhibits the cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) trans-signaling pathway without blocking the classic pathway and is a promising immunoregulatory therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These first-in-human, randomized, placebo-controlled, single- (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) trials evaluated olamkicept safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic characteristics. Doses tested in the SAD trial included seven single intravenous doses (0.75, 7.5, 75, 150, 300, 600, and 750 mg) and one subcutaneous (SC) dose (60 mg) given to healthy subjects (N = 64), and three intravenous doses (75 mg, 300 mg, and 750 mg) given to patients with Crohn's disease (CD; N = 24). Doses tested in the MAD trial included multiple intravenous doses (75, 300, and 600 mg once weekly for 4 weeks) given to healthy subjects (N = 24). No severe or serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, and myalgia in the SAD trial, and diarrhea, headache, and cough in the MAD trial. Infusion-related reactions occurred in one and two subjects in the SAD and MAD trial, respectively, leading to treatment discontinuation in the MAD trial. Olamkicept showed dose-independent pharmacokinetics after single and multiple administrations, and there was no major difference in systemic exposure between healthy subjects and patients with CD. Complete target engagement (inhibition of phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3) was achieved in blood around or above olamkicept serum concentrations of 1-5 µg/mL. Overall, these results suggest that olamkicept is safe and well-tolerated in healthy subjects and patients with CD after single intravenous/SC and multiple intravenous administrations.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Crohn Disease/immunology , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Double-Blind Method , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Injections, Subcutaneous , Drug Administration Schedule , Interleukin-6/blood , Healthy Volunteers , Adolescent
7.
MAbs ; 16(1): 2352887, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745390

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous injections are an increasingly prevalent route of administration for delivering biological therapies including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Compared with intravenous delivery, subcutaneous injections reduce administration costs, shorten the administration time, and are strongly preferred from a patient experience point of view. An understanding of the absorption process of a mAb from the injection site to the systemic circulation is critical to the process of subcutaneous mAb formulation development. In this study, we built a model to predict the absorption rate constant (ka), which denotes how fast a mAb is absorbed from the site of administration. Once trained, our model (enabled by the XGBoost algorithm in machine learning) can predict the ka of a mAb following a subcutaneous injection using in silico molecular properties alone (generated from the primary sequence). Our model does not need clinically observed plasma concentration-time data; this is a novel capability not previously achieved in predictive pharmacokinetic models. The model also showed improved performance when benchmarked against a recently reported mechanistic model that relied on clinical data to predict subcutaneous absorption of mAbs. We further interpreted the model to understand which molecular properties affect the absorption rate and showed that our findings are consistent with previous studies evaluating subcutaneous absorption through direct experimentation. Taken altogether, this study reports the development, validation, benchmarking, and interpretation of a model that can predict the clinical ka of a mAb using its primary sequence as the only input.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Machine Learning , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Subcutaneous Absorption , Models, Biological
8.
Viral Immunol ; 37(4): 216-219, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717823

ABSTRACT

In May 2022, mpox began to spread worldwide, posing a serious threat to human public health. Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavaria Nordic (MVA-BN) is a live attenuated orthopoxvirus vaccine that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the vaccine of choice for the prevention of mpox. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of all currently published literature on the efficacy and safety of the MVA-BN vaccine in the real world, showing that the MVA-BN vaccine is effective and safe, with efficacy of up to 75% with a single dose and up to 80% with a two-dose vaccine. Meanwhile, we found that subcutaneous injection has lower local and systemic adverse events than intradermal injection, regardless of single- or two-dose vaccination, and subcutaneous injection is better tolerated in children, the elderly, or people with underlying medical conditions. These results have important reference value for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Vaccine Efficacy , Vaccines, Attenuated , Humans , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Poxviridae Infections/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Vaccinia virus/genetics , Vaccination , Injections, Subcutaneous , Injections, Intradermal , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Orthopoxvirus/immunology , Orthopoxvirus/genetics , Child
9.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 35(1): 2324833, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, previously demonstrated clinical efficacy in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials that included adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD): ADvocate1, ADvocate2, and ADhere. AIM: This subset analysis evaluated 16-week physician- and patient-reported outcomes of lebrikizumab in the adolescent patients enrolled in these three trials. METHODS: Eligible adolescents (≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40kg) were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous lebrikizumab (500 mg loading doses at baseline and Week 2 followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo as monotherapy in ADvocate1&2, and in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in the ADhere study. Week 16 analyses included clinical efficacy outcomes (IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement, EASI 75, EASI 90), patient-reported Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement and Sleep-Loss Scale ≥2-point improvement. RESULTS: Pooled ADvocate1&2 16-week results in lebrikizumab (N = 67) vs placebo (N = 35) were: IGA (0,1) 46.6% vs 14.3% (p < 0.01), EASI 75 62.0% vs 17.3% (p < 0.001), EASI 90 40.7% vs 11.5% (p < 0.01), Pruritus NRS 48.9% vs 13.1% (p < 0.01), and Sleep-Loss Scale 26.9% vs 6.9% (p = 0.137). Corresponding results for ADhere, (lebrikizumab + TCS, N = 32; placebo + TCS, N = 14), were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: Lebrikizumab treatment demonstrated efficacy in improving the signs and symptoms of AD in adolescent patients, consistent with the ADvocate and ADhere overall population results.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Adolescent , Male , Female , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Child , Injections, Subcutaneous , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
10.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(3): 40-46, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy for most common rheumatological diseases, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in controlled clinical trials is well-studied. This study evaluated subcutaneous (SC) golimumab in Indian patients with active spondyloarthritis (SpA) of AS or PsA in a real-world setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, prospective, non-comparative, interventional, 24-week study was performed in patients (age ≥18 years) with active SpA of AS or PsA (NCT03733925). Golimumab 50 mg was given subcutaneously to the patients every 4 weeks. Safety was assessed. The proportion of patients with AS and PsA achieving ≥20% improvement in the Assessment of SpA International Society 20 (ASAS20) criteria and American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) responses, respectively, at weeks 14 and 24 were efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients enrolled (men: 78 [78.0%]; mean age: 36.7 [12.02] years), 94 (94.0%) patients completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events with golimumab were observed in 29/100 (29.0%) patients, and nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection (5.0% each) were the most common (≥5%). Deaths were not reported. At week 14, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.7; 86.1%) of patients with AS and 84.6% (95% CI: 69.5; 94.1%) of patients with PsA achieved ASAS20 and ACR20 responses, which were sustained at week 24 (ASAS20: 66.0% [95% CI: 50.7, 79.1%]; ACR20: 93.2% [95% CI: 81.3, 98.6%]), respectively. CONCLUSION: Golimumab (50 mg) administered subcutaneously was safe and effective in Indian patients with active SpA of AS or PsA during the 24-week study period with no new safety signals.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Arthritis, Psoriatic , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Humans , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Male , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Female , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , India , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Injections, Subcutaneous , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects
11.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 11(3): 537-548, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid-beta and remove amyloid plaques can slow cognitive and functional decline in early Alzheimer's disease. Gantenerumab is a subcutaneously administered fully-human anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody with highest affinity for aggregated amyloid-beta. Since the phase 3 GRADUATE trials did not meet the primary endpoint (change from baseline to Week 116 in Clinical Dementia Rating scale - Sum of Boxes), development of gantenerumab in sporadic Alzheimer's disease was stopped and all ongoing trials were terminated early due to sponsor decision. Subcutaneous administration at the clinic or at home by care partner would be an important option for other therapies in this class in order to increase flexibility and reduce overall burden. The insights obtained from the experience with gantenerumab home administration by care partner in the phase 2 GRADUATION trial will serve to guide the ongoing efforts with other anti-amyloid-beta antibodies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects on brain amyloid load of once weekly subcutaneous administration of gantenerumab and the safety and feasibility of home administration by care partners. DESIGN: Phase 2, open-label, single arm study. SETTING: Multicenter trial conducted in 33 sites in 8 countries from November 2020 to March 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 50 to 90 with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (mild cognitive impairment/mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease), and evidence of amyloid positron emission tomography positivity. INTERVENTION: Participants could receive up to 255 mg gantenerumab once-weekly, administered subcutaneously at site or at home by healthcare professionals or non-healthcare-professional care partners. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 52 and to Week 104 in brain amyloid load as measured by PET centiloid levels. The secondary endpoints were responses to the home administration questionnaire, plasma concentrations and safety. RESULTS: The overall number of participants enrolled was 192, with a mean (standard deviation) amyloid PET load at baseline of 101.80 (29.80) centiloids. At the time of early study termination by sponsor, 149 participants had valid Week 52 amyloid PET data (primary endpoint), and 12 participants had an early termination PET within the pre-defined time range of Week 104. The mean change in amyloid PET from baseline to Week 52 and Week 104 was -26.19 centiloids (range: -75.6-15.8; n=149) and -35.48 centiloids (range: -63.2--7.0; n=12), respectively. Responses to the home administration questionnaire at Week 52 (n=148) indicated that the majority of care partners (88-97%) considered administration of study drug at home easy (30.4%) or very easy (57.4%), and convenient (25.7%) or very convenient (70.9%). Care partners felt confident (31.1%) or very confident (62.2%) and satisfied (29.7%) or very satisfied (64.9%) with giving the injection at home. Responses by care partners at Week 36 (n=72), Week 76 (n=126) and Week 104 (n=29) and participant (patient) assessment of convenience and satisfaction at these time points were similar. There were no new safety findings associated with gantenerumab administered subcutaneously once weekly at 255 mg or safety issues associated with at-home injections by non-healthcare professional care partners. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly subcutaneous home administration of the anti-amyloid-beta antibody gantenerumab by non-healthcare-professional care partners to participants with early Alzheimer's disease was feasible, safe, well tolerated, and considered as a convenient option by both the care partners and participants with Alzheimer's disease. Although gantenerumab's development has been stopped due to lack of efficacy, this approach has the potential to reduce the frequency of hospital/outpatient clinic visits required for treatment with other anti-amyloid-ß antibodies and can increase flexibility of drug administration for people living with Alzheimer's disease and their families.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Aged , Female , Male , Caregivers , Positron-Emission Tomography , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Injections, Subcutaneous , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over
12.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 25(5): 93, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693316

ABSTRACT

Tolterodine tartrate (TOTA) is associated with adverse effect, high hepatic access, varied bioavailability, slight aqueous solubility, and short half-life after oral delivery. Hansen solubility parameters (HSP, HSPiP program), experimental solubility (T = 298.2 to 318.2 K and p = 0.1 MPa), computational (van't Hoff and Apelblat models), and thermodynamic models were used to the select solvent(s). HSPiP predicted PEG400 as the most suitable co-solvent based on HSP values (δd = 17.88, δp = 4.0, and δh = 8.8 of PEG400) and comparable to the drug (δd = 17.6, δp = 2.4, and δh = 4.6 of TOTA). The experimental mole fraction solubility of TOTA was maximum (xe = 0.0852) in PEG400 confirming the best fit of the prediction. The observed highest solubility was attributed to the δp and δh interacting forces. The activity coefficient (ϒi) was found to be increased with temperature. The higher values of r2 (linear regression coefficient) and low RMSD (root mean square deviation) indicated a good correlation between the generated "xe" data for crystalline TOTA and the explored models (modified Apelblat and van't Hoff models). TOTA solubility in "PEG400 + water mixture" was endothermic and entropy-driven. IR (immediate release product) formulation can be tailored using 60% PEG400 in buffer solution for 2 mg of TOTA in 0.25 mL (dosing volume). The isotonic binary solution was associated with a pH of 7.2 suitable for sub-Q delivery. The approach would be a promising alternative with ease of delivery to children and aged patients.


Subject(s)
Solubility , Solvents , Thermodynamics , Tolterodine Tartrate , Humans , Tolterodine Tartrate/administration & dosage , Tolterodine Tartrate/chemistry , Tolterodine Tartrate/pharmacokinetics , Solvents/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Biological Availability , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/methods , Injections, Subcutaneous , Drug Delivery Systems/methods
13.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302493, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Four-weekly intramuscular (IM) benzathine penicillin G (BPG) injections to prevent acute rheumatic fever (ARF) progression have remained unchanged since 1955. A Phase-I trial in healthy volunteers demonstrated the safety and tolerability of high-dose subcutaneous infusions of BPG which resulted in a much longer effective penicillin exposure, and fewer injections. Here we describe the experiences of young people living with ARF participating in a Phase-II trial of SubCutaneous Injections of BPG (SCIP). METHODOLOGY: Participants (n = 20) attended a clinic in Wellington, New Zealand (NZ). After a physical examination, participants received 2% lignocaine followed by 13.8mL to 20.7mL of BPG (Bicillin-LA®; determined by weight), into the abdominal subcutaneous tissue. A Kaupapa Maori consistent methodology was used to explore experiences of SCIP, through semi-structured interviews and observations taken during/after the injection, and on days 28 and 70. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Low levels of pain were reported on needle insertion, during and following the injection. Some participants experienced discomfort and bruising on days one and two post dose; however, the pain was reported to be less severe than their usual IM BPG. Participants were 'relieved' to only need injections quarterly and the majority (95%) reported a preference for SCIP over IM BPG. CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred SCIP over their usual regimen, reporting less pain and a preference for the longer time gap between treatments. Recommending SCIP as standard of care for most patients needing long-term prophylaxis has the potential to transform secondary prophylaxis of ARF/RHD in NZ and globally.


Subject(s)
Penicillin G Benzathine , Rheumatic Heart Disease , Humans , Penicillin G Benzathine/administration & dosage , Penicillin G Benzathine/therapeutic use , Male , Female , New Zealand , Injections, Subcutaneous , Rheumatic Heart Disease/prevention & control , Rheumatic Heart Disease/drug therapy , Adult , Adolescent , Young Adult , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/prevention & control , Qualitative Research , Rheumatic Fever/prevention & control , Rheumatic Fever/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
14.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 28(9): 3365-3374, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38766793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Obesity presents an enduring and multifaceted dilemma that impacts individuals, society, economies, and healthcare systems alike. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, including liraglutide and semaglutide, have received FDA approval for obesity treatment. This study aims to present a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the cost and clinical outcomes of semaglutide vs. liraglutide on weight loss in people with overweight and obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the cost and the clinical outcomes of adding weekly 2.4 mg SC semaglutide vs. daily 3.0 mg SC liraglutide or placebo to physical activity and diet control in overweight and obese patients. A clinical outcome of achieving ≥15% weight loss was chosen. A simple decision analysis model from a third-payer perspective was applied. Drug costs were based on the retail price of the USA market. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Results showed that 2.4 mg weekly semaglutide, when added to physical activity and diet control, was the most cost-effective choice in terms of ≥15% weight loss (ICER: $ 7,056/patient/68 weeks). The model was robust against the 50% increase in the unit cost of semaglutide and the 50% decrease in the unit cost of liraglutide, as well as the changes in probabilities by the corresponding 95% confidence intervals across the model. CONCLUSIONS: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that employing once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide emerges as a remarkably cost-effective option when contrasted with once-daily 3.0 mg liraglutide in patients with overweight and obesity when added to physical activity and diet control.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Glucagon-Like Peptides , Liraglutide , Obesity , Overweight , Humans , Glucagon-Like Peptides/economics , Glucagon-Like Peptides/administration & dosage , Glucagon-Like Peptides/therapeutic use , Liraglutide/administration & dosage , Liraglutide/economics , Liraglutide/therapeutic use , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/economics , Overweight/drug therapy , Overweight/economics , Injections, Subcutaneous , Decision Support Techniques , Weight Loss/drug effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Anti-Obesity Agents/economics , Anti-Obesity Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/economics , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
15.
Parasit Vectors ; 17(1): 211, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The health and productivity of dairy goats continue to be impacted by gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and lungworms (LW). Eprinomectin (EPN) is frequently selected for treatment because it is generally effective and does not require a milk withdrawal period. However, some factors, such as lactation, can have an impact on EPN pharmacokinetics and potentially its efficacy. To evaluate whether this can alter the efficacy of Eprecis® 2%, an eprinomectin injectable solution, a study was performed in lactating goats using the dose currently registered in cattle, sheep and goats (0.2 mg/kg). METHODS: This study was a blinded, randomized, controlled trial performed according to the VICH guidelines. Eighteen (18) worm-free lactating goats were included and experimentally challenged on day 28 with a mixed culture of infective gastrointestinal and lung nematode larvae (Haemonchus contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Dictyocaulus filaria). At D-1, fecal samples were collected to confirm patent infection in all animals. On D0, the goats were randomly allocated into two groups of nine goats; group 1 was treated with Eprecis® 2% at 0.2 mg/kg BW by subcutaneous injection, while group 2 remained untreated. Fecal samples for egg counts were collected from all animals on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 14. On D14, all goats were killed, and the abomasum, small intestine and lungs were removed, processed and subsampled to record the number and species of worms. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. After treatment, the arithmetic mean FEC decreased in the treated group and remained < 5 EPG until the end of the study, while the arithmetic mean FEC in the control group remained > 849.0 EPG. At D14, goats in the treated group had very limited or zero total worm counts, whereas all animals from the control group had a high worm burden. The measured efficacy was 100.0% against H. contortus and T. colubriformis, 99.9% against T. circumcincta and 98.0% against D. filaria. CONCLUSIONS: Eprinomectin (Eprecis®, 20 mg/ml), administered at the label dose (0.2 mg/kg), is highly effective against gastrointestinal nematodes and lungworms in lactating goats.


Subject(s)
Feces , Goat Diseases , Goats , Ivermectin , Lactation , Nematode Infections , Animals , Ivermectin/analogs & derivatives , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/pharmacokinetics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Goat Diseases/drug therapy , Goat Diseases/parasitology , Female , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Nematode Infections/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/parasitology , Feces/parasitology , Lactation/drug effects , Parasite Egg Count/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Anthelmintics/pharmacokinetics , Nematoda/drug effects , Gastrointestinal Diseases/veterinary , Gastrointestinal Diseases/parasitology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Lung/parasitology
16.
JAMA ; 331(18): 1534-1543, 2024 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587822

ABSTRACT

Importance: Lipoprotein(a) is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic stenosis, with no pharmacological treatments approved by regulatory authorities. Objectives: To assess the safety and tolerability of zerlasiran, a short interfering RNA targeting hepatic synthesis of apolipoprotein(a), and effects on serum concentrations of lipoprotein(a). Design, Setting, and Participants: Single- and multiple-dose study in healthy participants and patients with stable ASCVD, respectively, with lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations greater than 150 nmol/L, conducted at 7 research sites in the US, the Netherlands, UK, and Australia between November 18, 2020, and February 8, 2023, with last follow-up on August 23, 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive (1) a single subcutaneous dose of placebo (n = 8), zerlasiran 300 mg (n = 6) or 600 mg (n = 6); or (2) 2 doses of placebo (n = 9), zerlasiran 200 mg (n = 9) at a 4-week interval or 300 mg (n = 9) or 450 mg (n = 9) at an 8-week interval. Main Outcomes Measures: The primary outcome was safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes included serum levels of zerlasiran and effects on lipoprotein(a) serum concentrations. Results: Among 37 patients in the multiple-dose group (mean age, 56 [SD, 10.4] years; 15 [42%] women), 36 completed the trial. Among 14 participants with extended follow-up after single doses, 13 completed the trial. There were no serious adverse events. Median baseline lipoprotein(a) concentrations in the multiple-dose group were 288 (IQR, 199-352) nmol/L. Median changes in lipoprotein(a) concentration at 365 days after single doses were 14% (IQR, 13% to 15%) for the placebo group, -30% (IQR, -51% to -18%) for the 300 mg of zerlasiran group, and -29% (IQR, -39% to -7%) for the 600-mg dose group. After 2 doses, maximal median changes in lipoprotein(a) concentration were 19 (IQR, -17 to 28) nmol/L for the placebo group, -258 (IQR, -289 to -188) nmol/L for the 200 mg of zerlasiran group, -310 (IQR, -368 to -274) nmol/L for the 300-mg dose group, and -242 (IQR, -343 to -182) nmol/L for the 450-mg dose group, with maximal median percent change of 7% (IQR, -4% to 21%), -97% (IQR, -98% to -95%), -98% (IQR, -99% to -97%), and -99% (IQR, -99% to -98%), respectively, attenuating to 0.3% (IQR, -2% to 21%), -60% (IQR, -71% to -40%), -90% (IQR, -91% to -74%), and -89% (IQR, -91% to -76%) 201 days after administration. Conclusions: Zerlasiran was well tolerated and reduced lipoprotein(a) concentrations with infrequent administration. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04606602.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Lipoprotein(a) , RNA, Small Interfering , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Atherosclerosis/blood , Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Lipoprotein(a)/antagonists & inhibitors , Lipoprotein(a)/blood , RNA, Small Interfering/administration & dosage , RNA, Small Interfering/adverse effects , RNA, Small Interfering/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Internationality , Injections, Subcutaneous , Follow-Up Studies
17.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 209: 115322, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677443

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous (SC) drug delivery can be a safe, effective alternative to the traditional intravenous route of administration, potentially offering notable advantages for both patients and healthcare providers. The SC Drug Development & Delivery Consortium convened in 2018 to raise awareness of industry challenges to advance the development of patient-centric SC drug delivery strategies. The SC Consortium identified better understanding of patient preferences and perspectives as necessary to optimize SC product design attributes and help guide design decisions during SC product development. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of patient-centric factors for consideration in the SC drug delivery design and development process with the aim of establishing a foundation of existing knowledge for patient experiences related to SC drug delivery. This overview is informed by the outcomes of a multi-step survey of Consortium members and key pharmaceutical stakeholders. Framed in the context of the patient's treatment journey, the survey findings offer future perspectives to fill data gaps to advance patient-centric SC drug delivery.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Industry , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Patient Preference , Drug Design , Medication Adherence
18.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev ; 209: 115301, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570141

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous (SC) injections can be associated with local pain and discomfort that is subjective and may affect treatment adherence and overall patient experience. With innovations increasingly focused on finding ways to deliver higher doses and volumes (≥2 mL), there is a need to better understand the multiple intertwined factors that influence pain upon SC injection. As a priority for the SC Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, this manuscript provides a comprehensive review of known attributes from published literature that contribute to pain/discomfort upon SC injection from three perspectives: (1) device and delivery factors that cause physical pain, (2) formulation factors that trigger pain responses, and (3) human factors impacting pain perception. Leveraging the Consortium's collective expertise, we provide an assessment of the comparative and interdependent factors likely to impact SC injection pain. In addition, we offer expert insights and future perspectives to fill identified gaps in knowledge to help advance the development of patient-centric and well tolerated high-dose/high-volume SC drug delivery solutions.


Subject(s)
Pain , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Pain/drug therapy , Drug Delivery Systems
19.
J Diabetes ; 16(5): e13558, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664886

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using multiple daily injection therapy (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to compare outcomes of women treated with long-acting insulin or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study involved women with pregestational T1DM treated with MDI and CSII. Primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) before and during pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 121 studied women, the average age was 28.48 years, and the average body mass index was 21.29 kg/m2 at conception and 26.32 kg/m2 at delivery. Of the studied women, 78.51% had planned pregnancy. Women treated with MDI and CSII had comparable HbA1c before pregnancy or in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, women on CSII therapy had significantly lower HbA1c (6.07 ± 0.62 vs 6.20 ± 0.88%, p = .017), higher HbA1c on-target rate (71.43% vs 64.62%, p = .030), and greater decline of HbA1c from preconception to the third trimester (-0.65 vs -0.30%, p = .047). Fewer daily insulin requirements were observed in those used CSII compared with MDI-treated women (0.60 ± 0.22 vs 0.73 ± 0.25 U/kg/day, p = .004). Newborns born of mothers treated with the CSII method were more likely to have neonatal jaundice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.57) and neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.24-11.16), and women on CSII had lower scores in patient-reported quality of life (p = .045). In the MDI group, those receiving long-acting insulin had nonsignificant lower HbA1c and higher HbA1c on-target rate in the second and third trimesters, compared with those treated with NPH. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin pump users may achieve better glycemic control than multiple daily insulin injections, which did not substantially improve pregnancy outcome.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Glycated Hemoglobin , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Adult , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Injections, Subcutaneous , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Quality of Life , Glycemic Control/methods
20.
N Engl J Med ; 390(17): 1549-1559, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous administration of the monoclonal antibody L9LS protected adults against controlled Plasmodium falciparum infection in a phase 1 trial. Whether a monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously can protect children from P. falciparum infection in a region where this organism is endemic is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 trial in Mali to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous administration of L9LS in children 6 to 10 years of age over a 6-month malaria season. In part A of the trial, safety was assessed at three dose levels in adults, followed by assessment at two dose levels in children. In part B of the trial, children were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive 150 mg of L9LS, 300 mg of L9LS, or placebo. The primary efficacy end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the first P. falciparum infection, as detected on blood smear performed at least every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. A secondary efficacy end point was the first episode of clinical malaria, as assessed in a time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: No safety concerns were identified in the dose-escalation part of the trial (part A). In part B, 225 children underwent randomization, with 75 children assigned to each group. No safety concerns were identified in part B. P. falciparum infection occurred in 36 participants (48%) in the 150-mg group, in 30 (40%) in the 300-mg group, and in 61 (81%) in the placebo group. The efficacy of L9LS against P. falciparum infection, as compared with placebo, was 66% (adjusted confidence interval [95% CI], 45 to 79) with the 150-mg dose and 70% (adjusted 95% CI, 50 to 82) with the 300-mg dose (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Efficacy against clinical malaria was 67% (adjusted 95% CI, 39 to 82) with the 150-mg dose and 77% (adjusted 95% CI, 55 to 89) with the 300-mg dose (P<0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous administration of L9LS to children was protective against P. falciparum infection and clinical malaria over a period of 6 months. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05304611.).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Malaria, Falciparum , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Endemic Diseases/prevention & control , Injections, Subcutaneous , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Malaria, Falciparum/epidemiology , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Mali/epidemiology , Plasmodium falciparum , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Directly Observed Therapy , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...