Pharmacokinetic similarity of switching SAR341402 insulin aspart biosimilar and NovoLog insulin aspart versus continuous use of NovoLog in adults with type 1 diabetes: The GEMELLI X trial.

AIM: To assess whether multiple switches between SAR341402 biosimilar insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) and the insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp) leads to equivalent pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study randomized (1:1) 210 subjects with T1D treated with once-daily insulin glargine U100 as basal insulin to four 4-week periods of alternating multiple daily injections of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for the first 4 weeks, SAR-Asp in the last 4 weeks; switching group) versus 16 weeks of continuous NN-Asp (non-switching group). At week 16, a single dose (0.15 U/kg) of SAR-Asp in the switching group (n = 95) or NN-Asp in the non-switching group (n = 105) was given in the morning before breakfast. Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of SAR-Asp versus NN-Asp after the single dose at week 16. RESULTS: The extent of PK exposure was similar between the two treatments (SAR-Asp in the switching group and NN-Asp in the non-switching group) at week 16, with point estimates of treatment ratios close to 1. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC treatment ratios were contained within 0.8-1.25. For Cmax in the primary analysis set, the upper confidence limit was 1.32. This was because of the profiles of three participants with implausible high values. A prespecified sensitivity analysis excluding implausible values showed results contained within 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: PK exposure of SAR-Asp (switching group) and reference NN-Asp (non-switching group) were similar, supporting interchangeability between these two insulin aspart products.

Glargine insulin loaded lipid nanoparticles: Oral delivery of liquid and solid oral dosage forms.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The oral administration of insulin has so far been precluded by gastro-intestinal enzyme degradation and poor intestinal absorption. Preliminary evidence for peptide uptake by the gut has recently been obtained, by our research group, following the administration of nanostructured lipid-carrier suspensions loaded with glargine insulin in healthy animal models. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this experimental study, glargine insulin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers have been converted into solid oral dosage forms (tablets, capsules), that are more suitable for administration in humans and have prolonged shelf-life. The liquid and solid oral dosage forms were tested for glargine insulin uptake and glucose responsivity in healthy and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (6 animals in each group). A suitable composition gave redispersible solid oral dosage forms from glargine insulin-loaded carriers, using both spray-drying and freeze-drying. It was observed that the liquid and solid formulations had relevant hypoglycaemic effects in healthy rats, while only capsules were efficacious in diabetic rats; probably because of gut alterations in these animal models. Detected glargine insulinaemia was consistent with a glycaemic profile. CONCLUSION: The formulations under study showed their potential as oral glucose-lowering agents, particularly when used as capsules. However, further study is needed to produce a useful orally-active insulin preparation.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a new type of recombinant insulin Lisargine injection.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant insulin Lisargine is a new type of insulin. In this study, we aimed to compare its pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) with Lantus. METHODS: The PD test was performed by exploring the effect of single administration on blood glucose of normal rats and STZ-induced diabetic rats, and the effect of multiple administrations on blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats. Further PD tests include receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test. Four IU and 8 IU per dog Lisargine was used for PK test, insulin was measured and area under curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: With single injection, Lisargine 1.5 IU/kg had significant hypoglycemic effects at 1 and 2 h, similar to that of Lantus. Lisargine 5 IU/kg and 10 IU/kg lowered the blood glucose of STZ-induced diabetic rats at 1, 2, 4 & 6 h significantly. With multiple injections, Lantus lowered blood glucose at 2, 4 & 6 h, Lisargine 2.5 IU/kg, 5 IU/kg, and 10 IU/kg lowered blood glucose at 2 & 4 h significantly, compared with vehicle. There was no difference for receptor affinity test, receptor autophosphorylation test and adipocyte glucose uptake test between Lisargine and Lantus. The PK of Lisargine and Lantus of healthy Beagle dogs was very similar. CONCLUSIONS: This animal study demonstrated that PK and PD of Lisargine and Lantus were similar, suggesting the bioequivalence of these products.

In Silico Head-to-Head Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: Second-generation long-acting insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and degludec 100 U/mL (Deg-100) provide novel basal insulin therapies for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Both offer a flatter pharmacokinetic (PK) profile than the previous generation of long-acting insulins, thus improving glycemic control while reducing hypoglycemic events. This work describes an in silico head-to-head comparison of the two basal insulins on 24-h glucose profiles and was used to guide the design of a clinical trial. Materials and Methods: The Universities of Virginia (UVA)/Padova T1D simulator describes the intra-/interday variability of glucose-insulin dynamics and thus provides a robust bench-test for assessing glucose control for basal insulin therapies. A PK model describing subcutaneous absorption of Deg-100, in addition to the one already available for Gla-300, has been developed based on T1D clinical data and incorporated into the simulator. One hundred in silico T1D subjects received a basal insulin dose (Gla-300 or Deg-100) for 12 weeks (8 weeks uptitration, 4 weeks stable dosing) by morning or evening administration in a basal/bolus regimen. The virtual patients were uptitrated to their individual doses with two different titration rules. Results: The last 2-week simulated continuous glucose monitoring data were used to calculate various outcome metrics for both basal insulin treatments, with primary outcome being the percent time in glucose target (70-140 mg/dL). The simulations show no statistically significant difference for Gla-300 versus Deg-100 in the main endpoints. Conclusions: This work suggests comparable glucose control using either Gla-300 or Deg-100 and was used to guide the design of a clinical trial intended to compare second-generation long-acting insulin analogues.

In Silico Examination of Initiation of Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Toujeo Compared to Lantus Under 3 Dosing Titration Rules in Virtual Type 2 Diabetes Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits and clinical necessity of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D), healthcare providers are reluctant to initiate insulin, and patients are reluctant to start it for several reasons, one of these being the complexity of insulin treatment. Patients and their healthcare providers can benefit from titration algorithms (TAs) or rules that assist with the initiation and titration of insulin, performing the calculations that are needed to safely initiate and conservatively adjust. METHODS: The primary objective for this in silico study was to examine the effectiveness of 3 dose TAs (1-3) for optimization of basal insulin glargine (Gla-100 and Gla-300). In the simulations, 100 virtual subjects with T2D were included (50% men, age 62 ± 3 years, HbA1c 8.1% ± 2.9%, body weight 94 ± 16 kg). Subjects were studied under each TA (TA1 and TA2 fasting blood glucose [FBG] targets 90-130 mg/dL, TA3 FBG target 110-150 mg/dL). Initial dose of both insulins was based on 0.2 U/kg body weight. During 3 months, subjects reported their FBG to the LTHome web-based dose guidance system with a rules engine to safely guide long-acting insulin titration and maintenance. Subjects followed dose recommendations to reach designated FBG target ranges. RESULTS: All subjects reached stable doses under all TAs with both Gla-100 and Gla-300 insulin, and 93 or more of the 100 subjects, depending on the assigned TA, achieved the target FBG range within the 3-month simulation for all TAs. Mean FBG was lowered (Gla-100: 155 ± 40 to 118 ± 11 mg/dL with TA1 and TA2 and 132 ± 12 mg/dL for TA3; Gla-300: 125 ± 14 with TA1 and TA2 and 134 ± 15 mg/dL with TA3). Calculated HbA1c improved from 8.1% ± 2.9% to 7.1% ± 2.5% for TA1 and TA2 and 7.5% ± 2.5% for TA3, a reduction of 0.9% and 0.6% over 3 months for both insulins. Three subjects on Gla-100 and one subject on Gla-300 experienced mild hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: All TAs delivered safe dose recommendations with minimal hypoglycemia, leading to a stable glucose control in the majority of subjects.

Modeling Subcutaneous Absorption of Long-Acting Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Subcutaneous (sc) administration of long-acting insulin analogs is often employed in multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy of type 1 diabetes (T1D) to cover patient's basal insulin needs. Among these, insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are formulations indicated for once daily sc administration in MDI therapy of T1D. A few semi-mechanistic models of sc absorption of insulin glargine have been proposed in the literature, but were not quantitatively assessed on a large dataset. The aim of this paper is to propose a model of sc absorption of insulin glargine able to describe the data and provide precise model parameters estimates with a clear physiological interpretation. METHODS: Three candidate models were identified on a total of 47 and 77 insulin profiles of T1D subjects receiving a single or repeated sc administration of Gla-100 or Gla-300, respectively. Model comparison and selection were performed on the basis of their ability to describe the data and numerical identifiability. RESULTS: The most parsimonious model is linear two-compartment and accounts for the insulin distribution between the two compartments after sc administration through parameter k. Between the two formulations, we report a lower fraction of insulin in the first versus second compartment (k = 86% versus 94% in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p < 0.05), a lower dissolution rate from the first to the second compartment ([Formula: see text] versus 0.0008 min-1 in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p << 0.001), and a similar rate of insulin absorption from the second compartment to plasma ([Formula: see text] versus 0.0016 min-1 in Gla-100 versus Gla-300, p = NS), in accordance with the mechanisms of insulin glargine protraction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model is able to both accurately describe plasma insulin data after sc administration and precisely estimate physiologically plausible parameters. SIGNIFICANCE: The model can be incorporated in simulation platforms potentially usable for optimizing basal insulin treatment strategies.

[New generation of insulins: glargine U300. Summary of clinical evidence]. / Nueva generación de insulinas: glargina U300. Resumen de evidencia clínica.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease with increasing prevalence and still late diagnostic. This leads to an increase in the incidence of chronic complications, with signifi cantly increasing health costs. There is also a delay in the onset of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes for causes related to both patients and physicians. Despite advances in treatment, a low proportion of patients achieve adequate glycemic control. The high hypoglycemia prevalence, consequence of insulin, has led to the development of a new generation long-acting basal insulins to achieve a more stable and prolonged action profile, reducing the variability and risk of hypoglycemia. The EDITION program evaluated the efficacy and safety of glargine U300 compared to glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes at different stages of the disease. Gla-300 is a new formulation of insulin glargine which has a more stable and prolonged pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Gla-300 demonstrated efficacy and tolerability comparable to glargine U100, with a significant decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia, at night and in 24 hours, providing greater flexibility in the injection schedule, with a window of 6 hours. No increase in weight was observed compared to glargine U100. Bright study (2018) compared glargine U300 vs. degludec U100, demonstrating greater benefit in relation to the risk of hypoglycemia with Gla-300 during titration period. Gla-300 is a last-generation basal insulin, available to improve metabolic control, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia.

La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 tiene evolución crónica y progresiva, prevalencia creciente y aún es diagnosticada tardíamente. Esto conlleva mayor incidencia de complicaciones crónicas, con incremento de costos en salud. Existe retraso en el inicio de insulinoterapia por causas relacionadas tanto al paciente como al médico. A pesar de los avances en su tratamiento, una baja proporción de enfermos logra control glucémico adecuado. La alta prevalencia de hipoglucemia en pacientes insulino-tratados, impulsó el desarrollo de una nueva generación de insulinas basales de acción prolongada, mayor estabilidad con menor variabilidad y riesgo de hipoglucemias. El programa EDITION evaluó la eficacia y seguridad de glargina U300 vs. glargina U100 en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y 2, en distintas etapas de la enfermedad. Glargina U300 es una nueva formulación de insulina glargina con perfil farmacocinético y farmacodinámico más estable y prolongado que glargina U100. Glargina U300 demostró eficacia y tolerabilidad comparable a glargina U100, con descenso significativo del riesgo de hipoglucemias nocturnas y en 24 horas, aportando mayor flexibilidad en el horario de inyección, con una ventana de 6 horas. Además, no se observó mayor aumento de peso que con glargina U100. El estudio Bright (2018) comparó glargina U300 vs. degludec U100, demostrando mayor beneficio en relación al riesgo de hipoglucemia con Gla-300 durante el período de titulación. Gla-300 es una insulina basal de última generación, disponible para mejorar el control metabólico, con menor riesgo de hipoglucemia.

Lipid nanoparticles as vehicles for oral delivery of insulin and insulin analogs: preliminary ex vivo and in vivo studies.

AIMS: Subcutaneous administration of insulin in patients suffering from diabetes is associated with the distress of daily injections. Among alternative administration routes, the oral route seems to be the most advantageous for long-term administration, also because the peptide undergoes a hepatic first-pass effect, contributing to the inhibition of the hepatic glucose output. Unfortunately, insulin oral administration has so far been hampered by degradation by gastrointestinal enzymes and poor intestinal absorption. Loading in lipid nanoparticles should allow to overcome these limitations. METHODS: Entrapment of peptides into such nanoparticles is not easy, because of their high molecular weight, hydrophilicity and thermo-sensitivity. In this study, this objective was achieved by employing fatty acid coacervation method: solid lipid nanoparticles and newly engineered nanostructured lipid carriers were formulated. Insulin and insulin analog-glargine insulin-were entrapped in the lipid matrix through hydrophobic ion pairing. RESULTS: Bioactivity of lipid entrapped peptides was demonstrated through a suitable in vivo experiment. Ex vivo and in vivo studies were carried out by employing fluorescently labelled peptides. Gut tied up experiments showed the superiority of glargine insulin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers, which demonstrated significantly higher permeation (till 30% dose/mL) compared to free peptide. Approximately 6% absolute bioavailability in the bloodstream was estimated for the same formulation through in vivo pharmacokinetic studies in rats. Consequently, a discrete blood glucose responsivity was noted in healthy animals. CONCLUSIONS: Given the optimized ex vivo and in vivo intestinal uptake of glargine insulin from nanostructured lipid carriers, further studies will be carried out on healthy and diabetic rat models in order to establish a glargine insulin dose-glucose response relation.

Nueva generación de insulinas: glargina U300: Resumen de evidencia clínica / New generation of insulins: glargine U300. Summary of clinical evidence

La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 tiene evolución crónica y progresiva, prevalencia creciente y aún es diagnosticada tardíamente. Esto conlleva mayor incidencia de complicaciones crónicas, con incremento de costos en salud. Existe retraso en el inicio de insulinoterapia por causas relacionadas tanto al paciente como al médico. A pesar de los avances en su tratamiento, una baja proporción de enfermos logra control glucémico adecuado. La alta prevalencia de hipoglucemia en pacientes insulino-tratados, impulsó el desarrollo de una nueva generación de insulinas basales de acción prolongada, mayor estabilidad con menor variabilidad y riesgo de hipoglucemias. El programa EDITION evaluó la eficacia y seguridad de glargina U300 vs. glargina U100 en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y 2, en distintas etapas de la enfermedad. Glargina U300 es una nueva formulación de insulina glargina con perfil farmacocinético y farmacodinámico más estable y prolongado que glargina U100. Glargina U300 demostró eficacia y tolerabilidad comparable a glargina U100, con descenso significativo del riesgo de hipoglucemias nocturnas y en 24 horas, aportando mayor flexibilidad en el horario de inyección, con una ventana de 6 horas. Además, no se observó mayor aumento de peso que con glargina U100. El estudio Bright (2018) comparó glargina U300 vs. degludec U100, demostrando mayor beneficio en relación al riesgo de hipoglucemia con Gla-300 durante el período de titulación. Gla-300 es una insulina basal de última generación, disponible para mejorar el control metabólico, con menor riesgo de hipoglucemia.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease with increasing prevalence and still late diagnostic. This leads to an increase in the incidence of chronic complications, with signifi cantly increasing health costs. There is also a delay in the onset of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes for causes related to both patients and physicians. Despite advances in treatment, a low proportion of patients achieve adequate glycemic control. The high hypoglycemia prevalence, consequence of insulin, has led to the development of a new generation long-acting basal insulins to achieve a more stable and prolonged action profile, reducing the variability and risk of hypoglycemia. The EDITION program evaluated the efficacy and safety of glargine U300 compared to glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes at different stages of the disease. Gla-300 is a new formulation of insulin glargine which has a more stable and prolonged pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Gla-300 demonstrated efficacy and tolerability comparable to glargine U100, with a significant decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia, at night and in 24 hours, providing greater flexibility in the injection schedule, with a window of 6 hours. No increase in weight was observed compared to glargine U100. Bright study (2018) compared glargine U300 vs. degludec U100, demonstrating greater benefit in relation to the risk of hypoglycemia with Gla-300 during titration period. Gla-300 is a last-generation basal insulin, available to improve metabolic control, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia.

Comparison of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in healthy cats.

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (IGla-U300) and insulin degludec (IDeg) are synthetic insulin analogs designed as basal insulin formulations. In people, IGla-U300 is more predictable and longer acting compared with glargine 100 U/mL. The duration of action of IDeg in people is > 42 h, allowing flexibility in daily administration. We hypothesized that IDeg would have longer duration of action compared with IGla-U300 in healthy purpose-bred cats. Seven cats received 0.4 U/kg (subcutaneous) of IDeg and IGla-U300 on two different days, >1 wk apart. Exogenous insulin was measured and pharmacodynamic parameters were derived from glucose infusion rates during isoglycemic clamps and suppression of endogenous insulin. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and normally distributed parameters were compared using paired t-tests. There was no difference between IDeg and IGla-U300 in onset, peak action, or total metabolic effect. On average, time to peak action (TPEAK) of IGla-U300 was 145 ± 114 min (95% confidence interval [CI] = 25-264) longer than TPEAK of IDeg (P = 0.03) and duration of action (TDUR) of IGla-U300 was 250 ± 173 min (95% CI = 68-432) longer than TDUR of IDeg (P = 0.02). The "flatness" of the time-action profile (as represented by the quotient of peak action/TDUR) was significantly greater for IGla-U300 compared with IDeg (P = 0.04). Overall, insulin concentration measurements concurred with findings from isoglycemic clamps. Based on these data, IDeg is not suitable for once-daily administration in cats. The efficacy of once-daily IGla-U300 in diabetic cats should be further investigated.

Effect of Injection Site Cooling and Warming on Insulin Glargine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), closed-loop systems provide excellent overnight fasting blood glucose control by adjusting the insulin infusion rate based on corresponding changes in sensor glucose levels. In patients on multiple daily insulin (MDI) injections, such control in overnight glucose levels has not been possible due to the inability to alter the absorption rate of long-acting insulin after injection. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that increases/decreases of fasting glucose levels could be achieved by cooling/warming the skin around the injection site, which would result in lower/higher Glargine absorption rates from its subcutaneous depot. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with T1D (4 females; age 39.6 ± 16.7 years, HbA1c 7.8 ± 1.1%, BMI 25.4 ± 2.8 kg/m2) on MDI therapy underwent fasting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies that started at ~8 am and lasted 240 min on 3 separate days in random order: a control day without warming or cooling of the injection site and two experimental days, one day with injection site warming and the other with cooling. RESULTS: Cooling the skin around the glargine injection site reduced insulin concentrations by >40% (P < .01 versus the warming study, P = .21 versus the control study), accompanied by a 55 mg/dL increase in serum glucose (P < .01 versus the control study). Conversely, skin warming prevented the fall in serum insulin (P = .2 versus the control study; P < .01 versus the cooling study), resulting in a 40 mg/dL reduction in serum glucose (P < .001 versus the cooling study, P = .11 versus the control study). CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study has shown that cooling and warming the skin around the injection site provides a means to decrease and increase the rate of absorption and action of insulin glargine from its subcutaneous depot.

Incorporating Long-Acting Insulin Glargine Into the UVA/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator for In Silico Testing of MDI Therapies.

OBJECTIVE: Glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are long-acting insulin analogs providing basal insulin supply in multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Both insulins require extensive testing to arrive at the optimal dosing regimen, e.g., timing and amount. Here we aim at a simulation tool for evaluating benefits/risks of different dosing schemes and up-titration rules for both Gla-100 and Gla-300 before clinical testing. METHODS: A new pharmacokinetic (PK) model of both Gla-100 and Gla-300 was incorporated into the FDA-accepted University of Virginia/Padova T1D simulator: Specifically, a joint parameter distribution, built from PK parameter estimates, was used to generate individual PK parametrizations for each in silico subject. A virtual trial comparing Gla-100 vs. Gla-300 was performed and assessed against a clinical study to validate the glargine simulator. RESULTS: Like in vivo, in silico both insulins performed similarly with respect to glucose control: percent time of glucose between [80-140] mg/dL with Gla-100 vs. Gla-300 (primary endpoint) were 41.5 ± 1.1% vs. 39.0 ± 1.2% (P = 0.11) in silico, 31.0 ± 1.6% vs. 31.8 ± 1.5% (P = 0.73) in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The glargine simulator reproduced the main findings of the clinical trial, proving its validity for testing MDI therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: In silico testing of MDI therapies can help designing clinical trials. Due to the more standardized settings in silico (e.g., standardized meals and strict adherence to titration rule), any potential treatment effect is reaching statistical significance in simulation vs. clinical trial.

Clinical relevance of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec (100, 200 U/mL) and insulin glargine (100, 300 U/mL) - a review of evidence and clinical interpretation.

AIM: Second-generation basal insulin analogues (e.g. insulin degludec, insulin glargine 300 U/mL), were designed to further extend the duration of insulin action and reduce within-day and day-to-day variability, and consequently hypoglycaemia risk, versus earlier long-acting basal insulins. This review examines the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of insulin degludec (100, 200 U/mL) and insulin glargine (100, 300 U/mL), and their influence on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic publications comparing insulin degludec and insulin glargine were reviewed. RESULTS: Both insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL have more prolonged and stable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles than the earlier basal insulin analogue, insulin glargine 100 U/mL. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg, morning) showed a more stable pharmacodynamic profile (20% lower within-day variability [P = 0.047]) and more even 24-h distribution (over each 6-h quartile) than insulin degludec 100 U/mL, whereas the supratherapeutic 0.6 U/kg dose demonstrated a similar, albeit non-significant, trend. In contrast, a second clamp study indicated lower day-to-day variability in the 24-h glucose-lowering effect (variance ratio 3.70, P < 0.0001), and more even dosing over each 6-h quartile, with insulin degludec 200 U/mL versus insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg, evening). Methodological differences and differences in bioequivalence that may explain these discrepancies are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with earlier insulin analogues, second-generation basal insulins have improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles that translate into clinical benefits, primarily reduced nocturnal-hypoglycaemia risk. Additional head-to-head comparisons of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL at bioequivalent doses, utilising continuous glucose monitoring and/or real-world evidence, are required to elucidate the differences in their pharmacological and clinical profiles.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Modulation of Hepatic Glucose Production With Insulin Glargine U300 and Glargine U100 at Steady State With Individualized Clinical Doses in Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and endogenous (hepatic) glucose production (EGP) of clinical doses of glargine U300 (Gla-300) and glargine U100 (Gla-100) under steady-state (SS) conditions in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: T1DM subjects (N = 18, age 40 ± 12 years, T1DM duration 26 ± 12 years, BMI 23.4 ± 2 kg/m2, A1C 7.19 ± 0.52% [55 ± 5.7 mmol · mol-1-1]) were studied after 3 months of Gla-300 or Gla-100 (evening dosing) titrated to fasting euglycemia (random, crossover) with the euglycemic clamp using individualized doses (Gla-300 0.35 ± 0.08, Gla-100 0.28 ± 0.07 units · kg-1). RESULTS: Plasma free insulin concentrations (free immunoreactive insulin area under the curve) were equivalent over 24 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 (point estimate 1.11 [90% CI 1.03; 1.20]) but were reduced in the first 6 h (0.91 [90% CI 0.86; 0.97]) and higher in the last 12 h postdosing (1.38 [90% CI 1.21; 1.56]). Gla-300 and Gla-100 both maintained 24 h euglycemia (0.99 [90% CI 0.98; 1.0]). The glucose infusion rate was equivalent over 24 h (1.03 [90% CI 0.88; 1.21]) but was lower in first (0.77 [90% CI 0.62; 0.95]) and higher (1.53 [90% CI 1.23; 1.92]) in the second 12 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100. EGP was less suppressed during 0-6 h but more during 18-24 h with Gla-300. PK and PD within-day variability (fluctuation) was 50% and 17% lower with Gla-300. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized, clinical doses of Gla-300 and Gla-100 resulted in a similar euglycemic potential under SS conditions. However, Gla-300 exhibited a more stable profile, with lower variability and more physiological modulation of EGP compared with Gla-100.

Insulin depot absorption modeling and pharmacokinetic simulation with insulin glargine 300 U/mL
.

OBJECTIVE: Mathematical models of insulin absorption have been used to predict plasma insulin concentrations after administration, but few are specifically applicable to insulin glargine, which precipitates subcutaneously after injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The formation and redissolution of subcutaneous depots of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are modeled. Surface-area-dependent redissolution is introduced to established diffusion and absorption pathways, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles are simulated and subsequently validated using experimental data from euglycemic glucose clamp studies. Simulations are used to predict the PK effect of adapting the timing of once-daily insulin injections and of switching from one insulin product to the other. -Results: Simulated PK profiles resemble those previously observed in clinical trials, with Gla-300 providing more gradual and prolonged release of Gla-300 vs. Gla-100, owing to a more compact depot. The predicted PK profile of Gla-300 shows less fluctuation in plasma insulin concentrations than that of Gla-100, and may be better suited to adapting the timing of daily injections to account for variation in daily activities. Simulating a switch from one insulin glargine product to the other results in temporary alteration of previous steady state, but this is regained within ~ 3 days. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that PK differences between Gla-300 and Gla-100 are a product of the more compact Gla-300 depot and its smaller surface area. The model employed also allowed estimation of insulin glargine concentrations when varying the time interval between injections as well as when switching from one insulin glargine product to the other.
.

Experience after switching from insulin glargine U100 to glargine U300 in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. A study after one year of treatment in real life. / Experiencia tras el cambio de insulina glargina U100 a glargina U300 en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1. Estudio tras un año de tratamiento en vida real.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) does not always achieve metabolic control because, among other things, the ocurrence of hypoglycemic events associated to insulin use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive real life study of 247 T1DM patients, 55.5% male, aged 46.53 ± 16.23 years, and with a mean diabetes duration of 21.89 ± 11.99 years, who were switched from basal insulin glargine U100 to glargine U300. The primary endpoints were changes in Hba1c and number of hypoglycemic events, while secondary endpoints included changes in weight and insulin dose after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: After one year, no changes were seen in HbA1c, but the proportion of patients with HbA1c values <7.5% increased at 6 months (33.5 vs. 40.5%; P<0.05) and remained stable during one year of follow-up. Hypoglycemic events significantly decreased after one year of treatment in patients with previous hypoglycemic events. No changes were seen in body weight. Total insulin dose (U/kg) increased 7.24% at 6 months of treatment and by 8.69% at one year, mainly due to basal insulin. No changes were seen between the doses given at 6 and 12 months. These changes were similar in the different metabolic control groups and in patients with or without hypoglycemia. This increase was not related with prior basal insulin dose, baseline HbA1c level, number of hypoglycemic events or baseline weight. DISCUSSION: Glargine U300 is a good basal insulin alternative to treat T1DM, improving metabolic control in patients with HbA1c levels >7,5 and decreasing hypoglycemic events in patients with history of hypoglycemia without increasing body weight.

Comparison of the dose-response pharmacodynamic profiles of detemir and glargine in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes: A single-blind, randomised cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite their widespread use in this population, data on the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the insulin analogs detemir and glargine in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes are lacking. METHODS: The primary objective of the study was to compare the PD properties of two different doses of the basal insulin analogs detemir and glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and a BMI > 35 kg/m2. PD data were derived from euglycemic clamp studies over 30 hours and each subject was studied for four times after the subcutaneous injection of a lower (0.8 U/kg body weight) and higher (1.6 U/kg body weight) dose of both detemir and glargine using a single-blind, randomised cross-over design. RESULTS: Six male and four female patients with type 2 diabetes and a mean BMI of 43.2±5.1 kg/m2 (mean age 55.7±2 years, mean HbA1c 7.2±0.3%) completed the study. The total GIRAUC0-30 (mean difference 1224 mg/kg, 95%CI 810-1637, p = 0.00001), GIRAUC0-24 (mean difference 1040 mg/kg, 95%CI 657-1423; p = 0.00001), GIRAUC24-30 (mean difference 181 mg/kg, 95%CI 64-298; p = 0.004), GIRmax (mean difference 0.93 mg/kg/min, 95%CI 0.22-1.64, p = 0.01) and time to GIRmax (+1.9 hours, 95%CI 0.5-3.2; p = 0.009) were higher after the higher doses of both insulins, without significant differences between detemir and glargine. However, during the last 6 hours of the clamp the GIRAUC24-30 was significantly increased with glargine (mean difference 122 mg/kg, 95%CI 6-237, p = 0.043), reflecting a more pronounced late glucose lowering effect. CONCLUSIONS: A clear dose-response relationship can be demonstrated for both insulin analogs, even at very high doses in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared to detemir, glargine has a more pronounced late glucose lowering effect 24-30 h after its injection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN57547229.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in healthy dogs.

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin detemir are synthetic long-acting insulin analogs associated with minimal day-to-day variability or episodes of hypoglycemia in people. Here, 8 healthy purpose-bred dogs each received 2.4 nmol/kg subcutaneous injections of insulin detemir (0.1 U/kg) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg) on 2 different days, >1 wk apart, in random order. Blood glucose (BG) was measured every 5 min, and glucose was administered intravenously at a variable rate with the goal of maintaining BG within 10% of baseline BG ("isoglycemic clamp"). Endogenous and exogenous insulin were measured for up to 24 h after insulin injection. The effect of exogenous insulin was defined by glucose infusion rate or a decline in endogenous insulin. Isoglycemic clamps were generated in all 8 dogs after detemir but only in 4 dogs after glargine. Median time to onset of action was delayed with glargine compared to detemir (4.0 h [3.3-5.8 h] vs 0.6 h [0.6-1.2 h], P = 0.002). There was no difference in time to peak (median [range] = 6.3 h [5.0-21.3 h] vs 4.3 h [2.9-7.4 h], P = 0.15) or duration of action (16.3 h [6.1-20.1 h] vs 10.8 h [8.8-14.8 h], P = 0.21) between glargine and detemir, respectively. Glargine demonstrated a peakless time-action profile in 4/8 dogs. The total metabolic effect and peak action of detemir was significantly greater than glargine. Significant concentrations of glargine were detected in all but 1 dog following administration. Glargine might be better suited than detemir as a once-daily insulin formulation in some dogs based on its long duration of action and peakless time-action profile. Day-to-day variability in insulin action should be further assessed for both formulations.

Use of Insulin Glargine in the Management of Neonatal Hyperglycemia in an ELBW Infant.

Neonatal hyperglycemia is common in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants because of physiologic stress, exogenous glucose infusion, and postnatal corticosteroid therapy for hypotension, adrenal insufficiency, and pulmonary immaturity. The use of long-acting insulin glargine has been described in the treatment of transient neonatal diabetes in the premature infant, but in these reports is a lack of regard to its use in the treatment of iatrogenic neonatal hyperglycemia. We present the case of an ELBW infant with significant hyperglycemia that was refractory to usual treatment but demonstrated a favorable response to long-acting subcutaneous insulin glargine. The pharmacokinetics on regular insulin and long-acting insulin are different. Regular insulin is broken down into biologically active monomers after subcutaneous injection, and long-acting insulin forms microprecipitates and is gradually released to the body at a neutral physiologic pH after subcutaneous injection. Pharmacokinetics of both regular insulin and long-acting insulin are not clear in ELBW infants. However, with further research on long-acting insulin, it can be used safely to achieve consistent euglycemia with once-daily administration in neonatal hyperglycemia.

Comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine (Glaritus®) and Lantus® in healthy subjects: a double-blind, randomized clamp study.

AIMS: The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of an insulin glargine formulation, Glaritus® (test) with the innovator's formulation Lantus® (reference) using the euglycemic clamp technique in a single-dose, double-blind, randomized, two sequences, four-period replicate crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 40). METHODS: Subjects received subcutaneous administration of the insulin glargine (0.4 IU/kg) formulation at two occasions for test and reference and a 20% glucose solution was infused at variable rate to maintain euglycemia for 24 h. RESULTS: Both PK [area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC0-24 h) and maximum insulin concentration (Cmax)] and PD endpoints [area under glucose infusion rate time curve (AUCGIR0-24) and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax)] demonstrated bioequivalence of Glaritus to Lantus with the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio of test to reference entirely contained within 0.80-1.25. Both formulations showed equivalent geometric least-square mean LSM value (0.08 nmol/L) for Cmax. The geometric LSM AUC0-24 h value for Glaritus® (1.09 h nmol/L) was comparable to Lantus (1.05 h nmol/L). Median Tmax values were also identical (12 h for both), and median t1/2 values were also equal (18 h for both). For GIRTmax, the difference between the means for the two was not statistically significant. No AEs related to study formulations were reported, and both products were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The test product (Glaritus) was found to be bioequivalent to the reference product (Lantus). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2015/06/005890; http://www.ctri.nic.in/ .